DOCSLIB.ORG

The Roman Danube: an Archaeological Survey Author(S): J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Roman Danube: an Archaeological Survey Author(S): J The Roman Danube: An Archaeological Survey Author(s): J. J. Wilkes Source: The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 95 (2005), pp. 124-225 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20066820 . Accessed: 05/05/2013 21:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Roman Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Sun, 5 May 2013 21:44:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SURVEY ARTICLE The Roman Danube: An Archaeological Survey J. J. WILKES Dis Manibus Andras M?csy Petar Petrovic Teofil Ivanov The purpose of this survey is to present in summary form the present state of knowledge of the Roman Danube in the light of recent research and archaeological discoveries. The river itself is the core, as it was for the Roman presence in Central and Eastern Europe from early in the first century A.D. to the last decades of the fourth century. In its long course from its confluence with the Inn at Passau, the point from which it assumes its dominant role, to its delta on the Black Sea, Europe's greatest river impinges on the terri ? tory of several modern states Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, and Bulgaria, to which can be added Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia, where the Roman presence was extended along the coast north of the delta as far as the Crimea. Within the Empire the limits of this survey are the southern boundaries of the middle and lower Danube basins, the eastern Alps, the Dinaric and the Balkan mountains. As a result, except for the passages of the major roads to the Danube, little attention is given to those areas south of these limits that belong more to the Mediterranean, Adriatic Dalmatia, Macedonia, and Thracia south of the Haemus (Stara planina). Within these limits lie the Roman provinces of Noricum, Dalmatia north of the watershed, Pannonia, Moesia, both later divided into Superior and Inferior, and Dacia beyond the Danube. Except for Dacia, bounded on the north and the east by the ring of the Carpathians, the river formed the northern limit of these provinces and for Dacia its southern boundary. The first section (i) reviews recent research and publication in archaeology, epigraphy, and frontier history. The descriptive sections (ii-vn) are supported by two topographical appendices. The first (Appendix A) lists the major routes between the Mediterranean and the Danube by seven regions: from north-east Italy by the Alpine passes (RI), by the Carnic and Tauern Alps (RII), and by the Julian Alps (RIII), from the Adriatic across the Dinaric ranges (RIV), from the south Adriatic and the Aegean by the Vardar-Morava corridor (RV), from the Strymon and Hebrus valleys across the Haemus range (RVI), and from the Black Sea coast (RVII). The second (Appendix B) lists places by Roman province along both banks of the river and along the coast of the Black Sea between the Inn and the Crimea, and in Dacia beyond the Danube. Whereas in the first appendix sites are identified by ancient names where these are recorded on itineraries, modern names are used for the no name. second, since many of the lesser sites have recorded ancient Wherever possible, annotation in the descriptive sections (n-vii) consists of references to places in these lists. In both appendices location references are given to the recently published Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World where these are available (B + map number + location square) and to the modern state in which they are situated. Here the outline map (Fig. i) indicates the line of the major roads and the principal places along these and along the Danube, by references to the appendices. A significant number of publications relating to the Danube region are not readily available in libraries and for this reason a more accessible secondary publication (e.g. L'Ann?e Epigraphique) is wherever possible cited. This survey, though inevitably far from comprehensive, seeks to report the significant advances in research and major discoveries in several countries that have experienced are to major political changes in the last twenty years. There signs everywhere encourage the hope that over the next twenty years our understanding of the Roman Danube will be much improved, compared with that which is presented here. JRS 95 (2005), pp. 124-225. ? World Copyright Reserved. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 2005 This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Sun, 5 May 2013 21:44:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE ROMAN DANUBE: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY 125 I RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION General accounts of the Roman Danube are available in the four relevant volumes of the second edition of the Cambridge Ancient History and in a recent French compilation on matter entire area the Roman is now the Roman provinces.1 In the of maps the of Danube covered in the Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World. This supersedes for most purposes the sheets of the Tabula Imperil Romani that now cover most of the area but the detailed gazetteers of the latter still retain great value.2 As regards the individual Roman provinces, most recent studies tend to be defined by the boundaries of modern states and regions rather than the ancient limits, often as part of multi-volume national histories. The chapters on individual provinces contributed to the monumental Aufstieg und Wiedergang der r?mischen Welt, though of varying scope and quality, still retain value.3 For Noricum the work of G. Alf?ldy published more than thirty years ago is yet to be superseded, but is now complemented by the richly illustrated work of Thomas Fischer. The Roman era in Austria is now fully described in a recent collective volume that forms part of a national history, and for the modern region of Carinthia there is an archaeo logical atlas edited by G. Piccottini.4 Several studies by Hungarian scholars have tended to embrace areas of Pannonia that lie within eastern Austria and in the northern districts of Slovenia, Croatia, and Serbia. The synthesis of A. M?csy published in 1974, following his survey contributed to the IXth supplement of Pauly-Wissowa twelve years earlier, remains of value. A compendium on the archaeology of Pannonia edited by two American-based scholars also retains value for some of the chapters contributed by leading Hungarian specialists.5 In Pannonia the Severan era dominates the historical and archaeological record, above all in the major frontier centres such as Carnuntum, Brigetio, and Aquincum. An account of this 'Great Age of Pannonia' by J. Fitz describes the prominence 1 Vol. X (1996), 545-85; XI (2001), 577-603; XII (2005), 210-66 (all by J. J. Wilkes); XIII (1998), 482-6 (by M. Todd); C. Lepelley (ed.), Rome et l'int?gration de l'Empire 44 av. J.-C.-260 apr. J.-C. Tome 2. Approaches r?gionales du Haut-empire romain (1998), 231-97 (by J. J. Wilkes). 2 R. J. A. Talbert (ed.), Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World (2000), Map 12 (H. Bender), 13 (A. Bursche and L. Pitts), 19 (Bender), 20 (P. Kos and M. Sasel Kos), 21 (J. J. Wilkes), 22 (A. G. Poulter), 23 (D. Braund), 49 (Wilkes), with a separate directory for each map. Tabula Imperil Romani K34 Naissus-Serdica Thessalonike (1976), X35 (1) Philippi, Greek territory only (1993), L32 Mediolanum-Aventicum-Brigantium (1966), L33 Tergeste (1961), L34 Aquincum-Sarmizegetusa-Sirmium (1968), L35 Romula-Durostorum-,Tomis (1969), M33 Castra Regina-Vindobona-Carnuntum (1986). For the course of the river the Handbook of the River Danube (Admiralty War Staff Intelligence Division, London, 1915; with supplement 1919) is still serviceable. On landscape changes in general see J. Chapman and P. Dolukhanov (eds), Landscapes in Flux: Central and Eastern Europe in Antiquity, Colloquia Pontica 3 (1997). 3 Ed. H. Temporini, // Prinzipat vol. 6 (1977): Noricum (G.Winkler), Pannonia (J. Fitz and A. M?csy), Dalmatia (J. J. Wilkes and M. Zaninovic), Moesia Superior (M. Mirkovic and N. Gudea), Dacia (N. Gudea, H. Daicoviciu, C. Daicoviciu and D. Protase); also vol. 7 (1979): Moesia Inferior and Thracia (B. Gerov and Chr. M. Danov). 4 G. Alf?ldy, Noricum (1974), with the author's recent reflections in Tyche 13 (1998), 1-18; T. Fischer, Noricum, Zabernsbildbande zur Arch?ologie, series Orbis Provinciarum (2002) (on which see E. Ruprechtsberger, JRA 17 (2004), 697-8); V. Gassner, S. Jilek, and S. Ladst?tter, Am Rande des Reiches: Die R?mer in ?sterreich (?sterreichische Geschichte 15 v. Chr.~378 n. Chr., ed. H. Wolfram) (2002) (on which see M. Buora, JRA 17 (2004), 689?96); G. Piccottini (ed.), Arch?ologischer Atlas von K?rnten (1989). Recent Festschrift volumes include impor tant items: A. Betz and E. Weber (eds), Aus ?sterreichs r?mischer Vergangenheit (1990) (for H. Vetters); Festschrift f?r H. Stiglitz (1996); Corolla Memoriae Walter Modrijan Dedicata (1997); Carinthia Romana und die r?mische Welt (for G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boundary Stone Between Aquileia and Emona
    Arheološki vestnik (Arh. vest.) 53, 2002, str. 373-382 373 The boundary stone between Aquileia and Emona Marjeta ŠAŠEL KOS Izvleček Abstract V strugi Ljubljanice pod Bevkami je bil poleti 2001 najden In the summer of 2001, a boundary stone between Aquileia mejnik med Akvilejo in Emono, izdelan iz nabrežinskega and Emona, made of Aurisina/Nabrežina limestone, was apnenca. Datacija mejnika je predklavdijska, najverjetneje discovered in the bed of the Ljubljanica River below Bevke, je iz avgustejske dobe. Sodeč po drugih znanih mejnikih sta some 13 km to the southwest of Ljubljana. It is most probably imeli na njem omenjeni mesti enakovreden pravni položaj dated to the Augustan period and is certainly pre-Claudian. in sta pripadali isti administrativni enoti. Mejnik torej dolazuje, According to other similar boundary stones, neither of the da Emona ni nikoli pripadala Iliriku oz. pozneje provinci two communities involved could be subordinate to the other Panoniji, temveč je bila v Italiji, pred tem pa v Cisalpinski and both belonged to the same administrative unit. This means Galiji. that both towns belonged to Italy and that Emona had never been part of Illyricum (or, later, of the province of Pannonia). THE SITE OF DISCOVERY or less in situ, almost at the meander which, had it existed in the Roman period, would have no doubt been a good In the early summer of 2001, a boundary stone was point of orientation in this part of the Ljubljana Marsh. discovered in the bed of the Ljubljanica River below Near the mentioned farmhouse there is a relatively Bevke (some 13 km to the southwest of Ljubljana), at important find-spot from the early Roman period the mouth of a supposed drainage ditch, some three (coins, a bronze statuette of Apollo,2 a medallion hundred metres east of the confluence of the with a Prima Porta Type portrait of Augustus,3 Ljubljanica River and the Borovniščica Stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Istoria Rom Anilor
    N. IORGA uan ISTORIA ROM ANILOR VOL. II OAMENII PAMANTULUI (PANA LA ANUL 1000) + BUCUR E T1 1936 CARTEA I-iu AMINTIREA IMPERIULLII CAPITOLUL I. Barb arii §i Imperiul In Apus, numai prin ultimul sfert al secolului al III-lea conditiile contactului cu barbarii au fost deosebit de sAlba- tece. In sfdram'a'trurile de marmuri linse de fldcdri, In obiectele mdrunte fdcute bucdti, In grAmezile de monede ascunse Jul- lian vedea grozdvia 1°1.1. O oarecare ruralisare pare a se pronunta si In Galia In- sdsi2. Se lucreazd pamantul ca la camp Induntrul zidurilor In secolul al IV-lea s. Un fenomen asAmAngtor se petrece Lot alunci In Belgia, uncle in cala Francilor germani se Ingrd- mddesc ruinele 4. Tabloul pe care ni-1 presintd istoricul modern al Galiei al unei provincii fundamental ruinate In care s'au fdcut in grabd sfortgoidesperate pentru a se Inldri mdcar cateva celdti capabile de a resista s. E aceiasi operd care se face tot atunci pe malul drept dundrean, care n'a fost pArdsit, al Scitiei Minore, la Ulmelum si la odatd strillucitoarea cetate a Is trienilor. Jullian observd ialtceva: Imperiul trece, de pe urma greseldor sale, prinfro lngrozitoare crisci care märzancei ora- .ele. Le vedem pustiindu-se, fdrä nicio amenintare strdind, In Nordul Italiei si pe Adriaticd 6 1 Jullian, Ilistoire de la Ganle, IV, p. 601. 2 Ibid., pp. 603-4. 3 Libanius,Orationes, XVIII. p.35. Semnalat de Jullian,o.c., VII, p. 26, nota 6. 4 Sclmermans, In Buitetin des commissions royales d'art et d'archéo- logie, XXIV (1890), p.189 si urm.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage for Sale!
    Heritage for sale! The role of museums in promoting metal detecting and looting in Romania Iulian Ganciu Iulian Ganciu Address: Langebrug 40, 2311TM, Leiden Email: [email protected] Mobile: +40755279259 2 Heritage for sale! The role of museums in promoting metal detecting and looting in Romania Iulian Ganciu: s1586262 Supervisor: Profesor J.C.A. Kolen and Professor I. Lilley Research Master’s Thesis Specialization: Archaeological Heritage Management in a Globalizing World Course code:ARCH 1046WTY University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, 13.06.2016, Final Version 3 How can we live without our lives? How will we know it's us without our past? John Steinbeck, Grapes of Wrath 4 Table of Content 1. Chapter: Introduction ....................................................................................... 9 1.1. Problem statement .................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Opinion of the author and research question ........................................................... 13 1.3. Methods of collecting data ........................................................................................ 14 1.4. Theoretical framework .............................................................................................. 15 1.5. Thesis structure ......................................................................................................... 16 2. Chapter: Analysis of crucial documents ........................................................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying in Obuda Excavations
    SURVEYING IN OBUDA EXCAVATIONS By F. NOEH Department of Surveying, Institute of Geodesy, Surveying and Photogrammetry, Technical University, Budapest Received: ~ovember 15, 1976 Presented by Prof, Dr. Lajos HO)IORODL Director Branches of industry and SCIence where geodesy and related knowledge find an application include archaeology and monuments preservation. There is, howeyer, a scarcity of publicatious on geodesy in archaeology. The more inter­ esting seems to be an account of geodesy aspects of archaeological excavations in Obuda, now a district of Budapest. The first professional archaeological excavation in Hungary was made exactly in 6buda, near the actual FI6rian ter, where in 1778 Istvan Sch6nvisner excavated ruins of a Roman bath known actually to have belonged to the Roman castrum in Aquincum. Half a century later, excayations were under­ taken in the area of the civil town Aquincum near the actual Aquincum museum, and auother half a century later, track construction of the Szentendre district railways detected a Roman aqueduct connecting these two spots, highlighting archaeological excavations. By the turn of the century, the search for Fe/z€regyhaza, mediaeval predecessor of 6buda, and for the tomb of con­ quering Arpad, and in general, investigation of mediaeval settlement structures came to the foreground; planned, wide-range archeological research in 6buda dates from the World War I years. Since then, archacologicai work was multi­ faceted, purposeful, but concentrated at given spots. Most sensational excava­ tions of this period are the amphitheatrum in N agyszombat-utca, the palace of Roman pro consuls in the Shipyard Island, the mosaic-decorated Villa Her­ culea in Meggyfa utca, and th~ Aquincum ruin field itself, illustrative of gran­ deur and life of the Roman civilian town of quondam.
    [Show full text]
  • Commagenorum
    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 Institute of Archaeology Belgrade, Serbia 24. LIMES CONGRESS Serbia 02-09 September 2018 Belgrade - Viminacium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER Institute of Archaeology Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade http://www.ai.ac.rs [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637-191 EDITOR IN CHIEF Miomir Korać Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade EDITORS Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade Nemanja Mrđić Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade GRAPHIC DESIGN Nemanja Mrđić PRINTED BY DigitalArt Beograd PRINTED IN 500 copies ISBN 979-86-6439-039-2 4 CONGRESS COMMITTEES Scientific committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology Miroslav Vujović, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Stefan Pop-Lazić, Institute of Archaeology Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology International Advisory Committee David Breeze, Durham University, Historic Scotland Rebecca Jones, Historic Environment Scotland Andreas Thiel, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Esslingen Nigel Mills, Heritage Consultant, Interpretation, Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development Sebastian Sommer, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Lydmil Vagalinski, National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Mirjana Sanader, Odsjek za arheologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Organization committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Necropolis in Šempeter: the History of Research
    The Roman Necropolis in Šempeter: The History of Research IRENA LAZAR Twelve kilometres west of Celje lies Šempeter, well-known for having the finest preserved Roman monuments in Slovenia. This fertile valley attracted people even in prehistoric times, since the Amber Route (con- necting the Baltic regions rich in amber with the northern Adriatic mar- ket) passed that way. Prehistoric burial mounds are known in Griže and Šešče, while the prehistoric settlement connected with them is found in Langer.1 Prehistoric graves of the Hallstatt period were also discovered in Šempeter in the eastern part of the Roman necropolis, lying beneath the Roman graves.2 During the Roman period members of the civic aristocracy of Celeia owned estates in the valley and erected their tombs in Šempeter. The Ro- man settlement (vicus) was probably situated close by, next to the main road, but little is known of it. Roman remains have been recovered from the surroundings of Šempeter – e. g., from Zgornje Grušovlje, Podlog, Dobrteša vas, Novi Klošter and Gotovlje – but none of these sites has been systematically investigated.3 Nearby, there is also Ločica pri Polzeli, where, at the end of the 2nd century AD, the second Italic legion was stationed.4 Along the valley ran the main Roman road Aquileia–Emona– Celeia–Poetovio, which was partly researched during the excavation of the eastern part of the Šempeter necropolis and by means of topographical surveys.5 In Šempeter itself, a few hundred metres west of the excavated necropolis (near the local railway station), modest late Roman graves and 1 Lojze Bolta, Najstarejša zgodovina Spodnje Savinjske doline, Savinjski zbornik 1, 1959, 103–113: 108.
    [Show full text]
  • Praetorium and the Emona–Siscia–Sirmium–Tauruno Road in the Ancient Geographical and Epigraphic Sources
    Arheološki vestnik 68, 2017, str. 337–348 337 Praetorium and the Emona–Siscia–Sirmium–Tauruno road in the ancient geographical and epigraphic sources Praetorium in cesta Emona–Siscia–Sirmium–Tauruno v antičnih geografskih in epigrafskih virih Florin-Gheorghe FODOREAN Izvleček V prispevku avtor navaja nekatere nove ugotovitve o rimski cesti in cestnih postajah ob cesti Siscia–Sirmium vzdolž reke Save, izpričani na Tabuli Peutingeriani in Antoninskem itinerariju. Rezultat primerjave razdalj med naselbinama, omenjenima v obeh itinerarijih, je poskus nove datacije obeh antičnih kartografskih virov. V diskusiji je izpostavljen problem toponima “Incero sed mansio augusti in pretorio est” na Antoninskem itinerariju, primerljiv s cestno postajo Ad Praetorium/Praetorium na Tabuli Peutingeriani. Po mnenju avtorja obstajajo trdni argumenti, da se traso vzdolž reke Save uvrsti med eno najzgodnejših cestnih povezav v Panoniji. Cesta je bila osnovana kot vojaška komunikacija, a je kmalu postala ena najpomembnejših povezav Italije z Balkanom. Brez dvoma je pomenila močno prometnico in cestne postaje vzdolž nje so v poznejšem obdobju ponujale potrebno oskrbo za javni transportni sistem. To se jasno izraža na Antoninovem itinerariju. Ključne besede: rimska doba, Tabula Peutingeriana, Antoninski itinerarij, Praetorium, cesta Emona–Siscia–Sirmium– Tauruno, antična geografija, rimski itinerariji Abstract Our contribution considers some data from the Peutinger map and the Antonine itinerary, regarding the mentioning of the Roman road and the stations along this road between the settlements Siscia and Sirmium, along the River Sava. To obtain new results regarding the dating of these two important ancient cartographic sources, I have compared the values of the distances between the settlements recorded in both these itineraries.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM/GEN ED COMMITTEE a Standing Committee of the Educational Advisory Council Agenda for January 6, 2021 This Meeting Will Be Via Zoom
    CURRICULUM/GEN ED COMMITTEE a standing committee of the Educational Advisory Council Agenda for January 6, 2021 This meeting will be via Zoom Informational Items from the Curriculum Office (These items do not require curriculum committee recommendation) Grading Option Changes NA Experimental Courses CADD 199H Advanced Fusion 360 MUS 299I Social Justice in Song AB 199A Basic Skills Lecture AB 199B Frame Analysis & Repair Lec AB 199C Panel Repair Lecture AB 199P Auto Paint III Lecture AMT 199C Aircraft Electricity 1 AMT 299A Aircraft Electricity 2 AMT 299C Aircraft Electricity 3 Course Inactivation NA Notes from Curriculum Office NA Directions for accessing CourseLeaf Log into MyPCC, open the electronic approval queue link. You can also copy and paste this link directly into the Course Management window. https://catalog-next.pcc.edu/courseleaf/approve/?role=Curriculum_Committee_Chair Code Title Status AD 101 Addiction Edited AD 102 Drug Use and Addiction Edited AD 103 Women and Addiction Edited AD 104 Multicultural Counseling Edited AD 105 Aging & Addiction Edited AD 106 Nicotine Cessation Edited AD 108 Adolescence and Addiction Edited AD 109 Criminality and Addiction Edited AD 154 Client Record Management and Addiction Edited AD 156 Professional Ethics and Issues in Addiction Counseling Edited AD 161 Motivational Interviewing and Addiction Edited AD 184 Men & Addiction Edited AD 202 Trauma and Recovery Edited APR 145 Safety for the Limited Building Maintenance Electrician Added APR 230 National Electrical Code Edited BA 100 Career Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraficeiscylptyral1
    MONVMENTELE EPIGRAFICEISCYLPTYRAL1 ALE -AryzEviNT NATIONAL DE ANTICHITATI DIN BVCVRETI PVBLICATE SVI3 AVSPICIILE ACADEMIEI ROMANE DE GR.G. TOCILESCV Membru al Academiei Romano, al Institutelor archeologice din Roma si Viena, al Sccietiltilor archeologice din Paris, Orleans, Bruxelles, Roma, Atena, Odesa gi Moscova, al Societatii geografice, numismaticei istorice din Bucuresti, al Societatii istorice din Moscova, al Societatii de etnograflesiantropologie din Paris, etc., Vice-preseclinte al Ateneului Roman, Prof..la Universitatea din Bucuresti, Director al Muzeului national de antichitati, etc. 1 PARTEA II COLECTIVNEA SCVLPTVRALA. A MVZEVLVI PA.N.A. IN ANVL 1881. IBUCURETI NOIJA TIPOGRAFIE PROFESIONALA DIM. C. IONESCIT io.-STRADA SELARE. Jo. r 1908 a ..NicoLAe BALCESCU" PARTEA II MONVMENTELE SCVLPTVRALI I RELIEFURI ANTICE N.. 1 Capul in relief al unui rege al Assyriei, (pate Aur- nasir-pal), sail al until resbornic assyrian. Relieful oblu neinfatiseza,intr'omarime superiors Desoriptinnea. naturel, capul until rege al Assyriel, pate al lul Aur- nasir- pal, sail al unui resboinic assyrian. Perul capulul este acoperit pang la frunte§icefa de o legatura fa'cuta in chip de tichie §i fixata cu o curea latti pe dupa, urechY. Barba cea lungs, ca ipletele lasate pe spate, sunt frisate in carliontl. Monumentul provine din ruinele anticuluY ora§ Niniveh,Proveninta unde a fost gasit de d. Cocio Cohen impreuna cu fragmentul din inscriptiunea analelor lul A§ur-nasir-pal, regale Assyriel, publicat inacesta opera sub nr. 97 (pag. 479)§i avand aceia§1 proveninta 1). Faptul acesta al unel proveninteco- 1) Proveninta dela Niniveh a ambelor monumente se atesti prin raportul nr. 13 din 12 Maiti 1869 adresat Ministerukil instructiunki publice de clitre con- servatorul Musgulul de AntichitAtI.
    [Show full text]
  • Dacia Superior West
    Durham E-Theses The evolution of roman frontier defence systems and fortications the lower danube provinces in the rst and second centuries AD Karavas, John How to cite: Karavas, John (2001) The evolution of roman frontier defence systems and fortications the lower danube provinces in the rst and second centuries AD, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3957/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE EVOLUTION OF ROMAN FRONTIER DEFENCE SYSTEMS AND FORTIFICATIONS IN THE LO\VER DANUBE PROVINCES IN THE FIRST AND SECOND CENTURIES AD Volume II JOHN KARA VAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Paradoxul Dacic
    17 PARADOXUL DACIC Andrei VARTIC scriitor, editor al revistei de studii carpato-dunărene „Dava International”. 1. Cei peste 1900 de ani care au trecut de la războiul daco- roman din vara anului 106 ar trebui să pună pe gânduri măcar lumea academică din spaţiul cultural românesc. Mai întâi fiindcă strategiile şi tacticele acelui adevărat război mondial sunt, cum arată evenimentele, de mare învăţătură. Apoi, fiindcă unele din tehnologiile dacice rămân neîntrecute până la ora actuală, cum ar fi fierul pur dacic, protejat uluitor contra ruginii, sau mortarele inteligente, fără calciu şi cu proprietăţi chimice active peste două mii ani de la producerea lor. Iar giganticele terase ale Sarmisegetuzei Regia (efortul construirii lor întrece pe cel al Marii Piramide de la Giza), sau troianul de la Cioclovina (lung de peste 2 km, înalt şi acum de peste 3 m şi lat de peste 8 m) lasă neputincioase în jos mâinile celor mai ingenioşi ingineri (troianul este construit într-o zonă de munte greu accesibilă) şi nu-şi găsesc încă alte motivări decât cele ale paradoxului. Aşa şi cetăţile dacilor, cu toate că au fost zidite pe vârfuri greu accesibile de munţi, nu căutau marginea prăpăstiei, ci o îndepărtau cu terase care le fac vulnerabile din punctul de vedere al artei militare [1]. Să amintim că şi piatra din care au fost construite zidurile cetăţilor dacice a fost prelucrată atât de frumos chiar în carieră încât volens-nonlens se pune întrebarea dacă rostul ei a fost anume acela de a fi pusă într-un zid de apărare. Şi prelucrarea rocilor vulcanice numite andezite este misterioasă, fiindcă în zona cetăţilor dacice ele au fost utilizate la construirea unor uriaşe sanctuare, de facto modele matematice perfect armonizate cu diverse ţinte cosmice (cum este Săgeata Soarelui de Andezit de la Sarmisegetusa Regia, orientată spre Polul Nord Ceresc) [2].
    [Show full text]