DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Car Sharing Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Car Sharing Policy draft Car Share Policy 37 Public Submissions Received Date printed 1 April 2016 No. Name On Behalf Of Organisation Submission SourcePage Number 1 Richard Anderson Online 1 2 Elena Noyes Online 3 3 David Mitchell Online 5 4 Sue Stannard Online 7 5 Katriona Clarke Online 9 6 Rupert Snook Online 11 7 Darryl Peters Online 13 8 Terry Peters Online 15 9 Dave Bull Online 17 10 Frances Dando Online 19 11 Linda Pannekoek Online 21 12 Malcolm Menzies Online 23 13 Henrik Stovring MyCarYourRental.com Online 25 14 Karen Williams Email 27 15 Christine McCarthy Architectural Centre Email 29 16 Michelle Pawson Cycle Aware Wellington Email 31 17 Troy Luke Greater Wellington Regional Council Email 32 18 Rob Edward Online 34 19 Alex Campbell Hannah's Corner Body Corporate Online 36 20 Mark Beetham Online 38 21 sarah littlejohn NZPost Online 40 22 Robin Hickman Online 42 23 Graeme Ancell Online 44 24 Andrew Kissling Roam Car Sharing Mindkin Limited Online 46 25 Rebecca Zonneveld Evolve Youth Service Online 48 26 Oscar Ellison YourDrive Online 50 27 Alex Nairn Online 53 28 Maria Williams Online 55 29 Erik Zydervelt Mevo Ltd. Online 57 30 Liz Springford Online 60 31 James Burgess Online 62 32 Victoria Carter Cityhop Email 64 33 Victoria and Gavin Porter Email 75 34 Paul Young Generation Zero Email 77 35 Robert Murray Post 79 36 Georgia Beamish‐White Wellington Chamber of Commerce Email 81 37 Victoria Carter Email 85 1 Submitter Details First Name: Richard Last Name: Anderson Street: 6 Travancore Street Suburb: Island Bay City: Wellington Country: PostCode: 6023 Daytime Phone: 021 280 1504 Mobile: 021 280 1504 eMail: [email protected] Wishes to be heard: Yes I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered. Correspondence to: Submitter Agent Both Submission Your views on the draft Car Share Policy Question 1: Do you agree with the Council support car sharing by: providing on and off-street car parks for the exclusive use of authorised car share operators? Yes No fully subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that is providing the car parks at no charge)? Yes No partially subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that means the car share operator would pay a charge for exclusive use of the car park but not the full cost of making use of this space)? Yes No Question 2: If you would prefer to see a partial subsidy, what level of Council support do you favour? Please tick one, or specify another level of support. 75% 50% 1 1 25% Something else (please state) 0% Question 3: The draft policy sets no maximum number of car parks for car sharing if a provider is able to demonstrate demand beyond the initial allocation of two car parks. Do you agree that there should be no maximum or limit to the number of on or off-street car parks that could potentially be allocated to each car share provider? Yes No Question 4: If you favour limiting the number of car parks that could be allocated to each car share provider, what do you think that limit should be? Comments Question 5: Are there any other changes you would like to see made to the draft policy? Comments Question 6: Do you have any other comments on the draft policy? Comments Attached Documents File Draft Car Share Policy 2 2 Submitter Details First Name: Elena Last Name: Noyes Street: 2-17 Hall st Suburb: Newtown City: Newtown Country: New Zealand PostCode: 6021 Daytime Phone: 0220743043 Mobile: 0220743043 eMail: [email protected] Wishes to be heard: Yes I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered. Correspondence to: Submitter Agent Both Submission Your views on the draft Car Share Policy Question 1: Do you agree with the Council support car sharing by: providing on and off-street car parks for the exclusive use of authorised car share operators? Yes No fully subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that is providing the car parks at no charge)? Yes No partially subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that means the car share operator would pay a charge for exclusive use of the car park but not the full cost of making use of this space)? Yes No Question 2: If you would prefer to see a partial subsidy, what level of Council support do you favour? Please tick one, or specify another level of support. 75% 50% 3 2 25% Something else (please state) Question 3: The draft policy sets no maximum number of car parks for car sharing if a provider is able to demonstrate demand beyond the initial allocation of two car parks. Do you agree that there should be no maximum or limit to the number of on or off-street car parks that could potentially be allocated to each car share provider? Yes No Question 4: If you favour limiting the number of car parks that could be allocated to each car share provider, what do you think that limit should be? Comments Question 5: Are there any other changes you would like to see made to the draft policy? Comments Question 6: Do you have any other comments on the draft policy? Comments It's fantastic to see this initiative. I am a member of a car share arrangement and it has made a huge difference in my family. We can use the car when we need to, and do not need to worry about owning and maintaining (and parking) a car otherwise. Attached Documents File Draft Car Share Policy 4 3 Submitter Details First Name: David Last Name: Mitchell Street: Suburb: City: Country: PostCode: 6011 eMail: [email protected] Wishes to be heard: Yes I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered. Correspondence to: Submitter Agent Both Submission Your views on the draft Car Share Policy Question 1: Do you agree with the Council support car sharing by: providing on and off-street car parks for the exclusive use of authorised car share operators? Yes No fully subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that is providing the car parks at no charge)? Yes No partially subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that means the car share operator would pay a charge for exclusive use of the car park but not the full cost of making use of this space)? Yes No Question 2: If you would prefer to see a partial subsidy, what level of Council support do you favour? Please tick one, or specify another level of support. 75% 50% 25% 5 3 Something else (please state) 100% until it is proven to be successful. After that, a subsidy can be looked at. Question 3: The draft policy sets no maximum number of car parks for car sharing if a provider is able to demonstrate demand beyond the initial allocation of two car parks. Do you agree that there should be no maximum or limit to the number of on or off-street car parks that could potentially be allocated to each car share provider? Yes No Question 4: If you favour limiting the number of car parks that could be allocated to each car share provider, what do you think that limit should be? Comments Question 5: Are there any other changes you would like to see made to the draft policy? Comments Question 6: Do you have any other comments on the draft policy? Comments I think the Council needs to support this policy as much as possible, until it is proven to be successful. If it is, then funding arrangements can be changed. Alternatively, if it is not successful, the policy can be scrapped. Attached Documents File Draft Car Share Policy 6 4 Submitter Details First Name: Sue Last Name: Stannard Street: 9 Imlay Crescent Suburb: Ngaio City: Wellington Country: PostCode: 6035 eMail: [email protected] Wishes to be heard: Yes I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered. Correspondence to: Submitter Agent Both Submission Your views on the draft Car Share Policy Question 1: Do you agree with the Council support car sharing by: providing on and off-street car parks for the exclusive use of authorised car share operators? Yes No fully subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that is providing the car parks at no charge)? Yes No partially subsidising the exclusive use of on and off-street car parks (that means the car share operator would pay a charge for exclusive use of the car park but not the full cost of making use of this space)? Yes No Question 2: If you would prefer to see a partial subsidy, what level of Council support do you favour? Please tick one, or specify another level of support. 75% 50% 25% 7 4 Something else (please state) Question 3: The draft policy sets no maximum number of car parks for car sharing if a provider is able to demonstrate demand beyond the initial allocation of two car parks. Do you agree that there should be no maximum or limit to the number of on or off-street car parks that could potentially be allocated to each car share provider? Yes No Question 4: If you favour limiting the number of car parks that could be allocated to each car share provider, what do you think that limit should be? Comments I'm not sure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Research
    ISSN: 2634 - 8845 Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Research Research Article Open Access Car Sharing In a Compact City: Pinning Down the Benefits and Barriers Lucia Sobiecki and Ralph Chapman* 1Graduate Programme, Environmental Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand ABSTRACT New Zealand’s sprawling urban development and high levels of car dependency have resulted in significant environmental impacts, including increased carbon emissions and pollution. Car sharing can support sustainable transport patterns by offering an alternative to private vehicle ownership. Internationally, it has become increasingly popular but is still in the early stages of development in New Zealand. A survey of 356 Wellington residents and interviews with 13 car share stakeholders collected data on interest in car sharing and barriers facing the service in New Zealand’s capital. The results suggest that car sharing could become an important mobility option in Wellington and further policy support for car sharing could enable Wellington to take full advantage of its benefits. *Corresponding author Ralph Chapman, Graduate Programme, Environmental Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Centre for Sustainable Cities, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 31, 2020; Accepted: August 06, 2020; Published: August 12, 2020 Keywords: Car Sharing, Benefits, Barriers, Policy, Wellington, Most car sharing schemes are ‘round-trip’ as the user must return New Zealand the car to the same place it was accessed, and pay for the entire time from gaining access to the car, to returning it [10]. Some cities Introduction have also introduced ‘point-to-point’ or ‘free-floating’ car sharing, New Zealand is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, which enables users to pick up the car share vehicle from one car with 86 percent of New Zealanders living in cities and towns park and return it to a different car park.
    [Show full text]
  • THINK PIECE Autonomous Vehicles and Future Urban Environments
    THINK PIECE Autonomous vehicles and future urban environments: Exploring implications for wellbeing in an ageing society (Second Edition) Helen Fitt, Angela Curl, Rita Dionisio-McHugh, Amy Fletcher, Bob Frame, Annabel Ahuriri-Driscoll 14 May 2018 This Think Piece Think pieces have two purposes. One is to communicate the thoughts of the author or authors. The second is to prompt readers to think for themselves. This document has both of these purposes at heart. As people with expertise in a range of different areas, we seek to communicate our thoughts about autonomous vehicles, urban and built environments, and wellbeing in an ageing society. We also seek to trigger a wider debate about New Zealand’s future transport system and the policy decisions that could help to shape it. This Think Piece is an early output from a cross-disciplinary collaboration. Its production follows on from workshops and extensive discussion amongst members of the research team; it also draws on discussions with external stakeholders including policy makers, industry representatives, and social and care service providers. It is supported by the other reports listed below and draws extensively from them. We hope that this Think Piece will be the foundation of future work in which we will be able to explore the empirical and theoretical issues it raises in more depth. We also hope that the report will be useful to others with a range of priorities, projects, and perspectives. For now though, we invite you to join us in thinking about what the future might hold, what we would like it to hold, and how we move from here to there.
    [Show full text]
  • Live Well, Live Green
    Live Well, Live Green NOTICE: You Do NOT Have the Right to Reprint or Resell this Report! You Also MAY NOT Give Away, Sell or Share the Content Herein © Copyright. All rights reserved. Clare Delaney Page 2 Live Well, Live Green Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 6 The Purpose of This Book ........................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 1: Banish the Toxins! ................................................................................................................. 8 7 Home Health Products You Don’t Need ....................................................................................... 8 Household Products to Avoid........................................................................................................ 10 Heavenly Aromas! ......................................................................................................................... 13 Mosquitoes ................................................................................................................................... 14 Eco-friendly Eye Care .................................................................................................................... 18 Allergies ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Wonderful Lemons! .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Public's Readiness for Connected
    The New Zealand public’s readiness for connected- and autonomous-vehicles (including driverless), car and ridesharing schemes and the social impacts of these May 2020 NJ Starkey and SG Charlton ISBN 978-1-98-856162-2 (electronic) ISSN 1173-3764 (electronic) NZ Transport Agency Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand Telephone 64 4 894 5400; facsimile 64 4 894 6100 [email protected] www.nzta.govt.nz Starkey, NJ and SG Charlton (2020) The New Zealand public’s readiness for connected- and autonomous-vehicles (including driverless), car and ridesharing schemes and the social impacts of these. NZ Transport Agency research report 663. 159pp. The School of Psychology, University of Waikato, was contracted by the NZ Transport Agency in 2017 to carry out this research. This publication is copyright © NZ Transport Agency. This copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to copy, distribute and adapt this work, as long as you attribute the work to the NZ Transport Agency and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. While you are free to copy, distribute and adapt this work, we would appreciate you notifying us that you have done so. Notifications and enquiries about this work should be made to the Manager Research and Evaluation Programme Team, Research and Analytics Unit, NZ Transport Agency, at [email protected]. Keywords: attitudes, autonomous vehicles, carsharing, connected vehicles, mobility as a service, ridesharing An important note for the reader The NZ Transport Agency is a Crown entity established under the Land Transport Management Act 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Fast-Groмing Sharing Economy
    PLATFORMS IN AOTEAROA OUR FAST-GROWING SHARING ECONOMY Kevin Jenkins The Otago Farmers Market Photo: Liz Sinclair My favourite farmers’ market in Aotearoa is in Dunedin. Digital platforms Talk of ‘platforms’ – or the ‘sharing Over the warmer months it has the best fresh produce in economy’ – sometimes seems to be New Zealand: Central Otago apricots the size of peaches, old- ubiquitous. But how significant is this model, and what kinds of policy and school gooseberries, greengage plums. But the Otago Farmers regulatory issues is it raising? Market also offers a physical pun. It’s at Dunedin’s famous As Facebook, Amazon, Ali Baba, Tencent, Uber and so on have grown to Railway Station, and there on the station platform you’ll dominance over the last decade, these huge also find many artisan products, like seaweed condiments, digital marketplaces have become the face of the model. However, the repeated citing craft beer, and bread of every kind. A ‘platform’, according of just this small group of behemoths has obscured the true depth and breadth of the to Choudary and Parker, is ‘a business model that uses platform phenomenon, and also the pace technology to connect people, organisations and resources in of change. The model is expanding and innovating quickly, and much of this is at ecosystems to exchange goods, services and ideas’ (Choudary smaller, local scales. and Parker, 2016). Take a broad view of ‘technology’ and the With the focus on the big international players, it’s easy to overlook the fact that Otago Farmers Market is a platform on a platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Is Contagious 1960-2010
    SHARING IS CONTAGIOUS THIS INFOGRAPHIC CHARTS THE RISE OF COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION: THE RAPID EXPLOSION IN TRADITIONAL SHARING, BARTERING, LENDING, TRADING, RENTING, GIFTING, AND SWAPPING REDEFINED THROUGH TECHNOLOGY AND PEER COMMUNITIES. WWW.COLLABORATIVECONSUMPTION.COM 1960-2010 PEER-TO-PEER PRODUCT SHARING STARTS TO RELAYRIDES / WHIPCAR / MU DRIVE MY CAR RENTALS / WHEELS B-CYCLE / MELBOURNE BIKE SHARE THREDUP/ 99 DRESSES / OPENSPOT / PRIMOSPOT THING LOOP / SNAPGOODS YES-SECURE / IGRIN BECOME MAINSTREAM AND HYPER-LOCAL 2010 STICKY BITS / ITIZEN BLOCKCHALK ZIBIGO / RIDEPENGUIN / CAB CORNER NICE RIDE / BIXI (LONDON) / ECOBICI SHARE ZEN / CROWDRENT COZYBUG SWAPBOOKS SHARED EARTH / URBAN GARDEN SHARE NEIGHBORGOODS / TRADESCHOOL PAYPAL 2.0 / PEEPEX/ OURGOODS 1.96 BN ELINOR OSTROM WINS NOBEL PRIZE FOR ECONOMICS HOURCAR / WHIZZ CAR CARSHARE HFX / CONNECT HIRE THINGS / SMARTYRENTS / SWAPITBABY / SWAPSTER / SWAPCOVE / FIRST TO WIN WITH A THEORY IN THE EFFICIENCY OF COMMONS-BASED SOCIETIES 2009 FOURSQUARE U-CARSHARE / WECAR / CAR2GO BIXI / DUBLIN BIKES / VILLO WEAR TODAY, GONE TOMORROW REUSEITNETWORK TOYSWAP / THREDSWAP CRASHPADDER / ISTOPOVEROFFICE SHARE SOME SUGAR VENMO / TINY / QUIDS / KROONOS 1.8 BN ACCESS IS THE NEW OWNERSHIP GREAT FINANCIAL CRASH SHOCKS CONSUMER BEHAVIORS RENTALIC / BABYPLAYS / AIRBNB / LAUNCHPAD / SPAREGROUND / PRESIDENT OBAMA (MYBO.COM) PROVES THE POWER OF MASS COLLABORATION 2008 CONNECT / CITYWHEELS / MINT HZ BIKE / VEL'OH / BIKE ONE LUCKYDUCK / DRESSEDUP KASHLESS DIGNSWAP / SWAPACE LANDSHARE / ROOMORAMA WECOMMUNE /
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-11-16-Driven.Pdf
    Thursday,Th November 16, 20177 MIGHTY MUSTANG Unique Shelby GT500 Coupe up for sale P3 SEE MORE AT Ruben promoting road safety for 20 years P2 Award winning Te Awamutu hot rods P6 Your Local Vehicle Electrical Experts AFTER SALES SERVICE PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE AUTO ELECTRICAL EXIDE BATTERIES AUDIO•ALARMS DIAGNOSTICS AIR CONDITIONING AUTO ELECTRICAL 2 Te Awamutu Courier Thursday, November 16, 2017 Ruben road safety programme turns 20 AUTOMOTIVE DIRECTORY t’s been 20 years since Ruben the Road Safety IBear launched. His look might have changed, but the foundation road safety skills GLASS / PANEL / PAINT he teaches to Waikato children hasn’t. ALEXANDRA AUTO BODY FABRICATION LTD Waikato Regional Council 6 Hanning Road, Pirongia.............................................07 872 8044 or Kevin 021 144 9989 launched the programme in KIHIKIHI AUTO BODY REPAIRS Havelock Street, off Leslie Street, Kihikihi November, 1997 because e: [email protected]........................................................................... 07 871 4746 children aged 3-7 years were identified as being at highest NOVUS AUTO GLASS 53 Bond Road, Te Awamutu risk of injury in and around e: [email protected] w: novus.co.nz............................................... 07 870 1411 the region’s roads. TONY FABISH PANELWORKS Bond Road, Te Awamutu The programme’s 20th e: [email protected].......................................................................... 07 871 5069 birthday was celebrated in Taupo¯with the Mountview School community, tamariki AUTO SERVICING / REPAIRS from Te Ko¯hanga Reo Atawhai, as well as people A&H MOTORS 259 Rickit Road, Te Awamutu who work with Ruben to keep e: [email protected] w: facebook.com/AandhMotorsLtd .................. 07 871 6555 children safe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disruptive Mobility and the Future of Our Neighbourhoods
    The Disruptive Mobility and the Future of our Neighbourhoods Mohsen Mohammadzadeh University of Auckland Building Better Homes Towns and Cities National Science Challenge 11 Working Paper 18-03 November 2018 The Disruptive Mobility and the Future of our Neighbourhoods Title Working Paper 18-03 ISSN (online) 2624-0750 Author(s) Mohsen Mohammadzadeh Series Building Better Homes Towns and Cities working papers Series Editor Errol Haarhoff Author Contact Details Mohsen Mohammadzadeh School of Architecture and Planning, University of Auckland [email protected] Acknowledgements This work was funded by Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities National Science Challenge, Strategic Research Area – Shaping Places: Future Neighbourhoods. Recommended citation Mohammadzadeh, M. (2018). The Disruptive Mobility and the Future of our Neighbourhoods. Working Paper 18-03. Auckland, New Zealand: National Science Challenge 11: Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities. This report is available from: http://www.buildingbetter.nz/resources/publications.html. © 2018 Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities National Science Challenge and the authors. Short extracts, not exceeding two paragraphs, may be quoted provided clear attribution is given. Working Papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. This document has successfully completed formal and independent scrutiny for quality-assurance purposes. Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities National Science Challenge Private Bag 50 908 www.buildingbetter.nz Porirua 5240 [email protected] New Zealand Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities | Working Paper 18-03 2 Abstract This working paper provides a resource for urban designers, planners and policymakers in New Zealand concerning disruptive mobility and its potential impacts on our cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Or Owning Autonomous Vehicles? Comprehending the Role of Ideology in the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles in the Society of Automobility
    Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 9 (2021) 100294 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trip Sharing or owning autonomous vehicles? Comprehending the role of ideology in the adoption of autonomous vehicles in the society of automobility Mohsen Mohammadzadeh School of Architecture and Planning, the University of Auckland, School of Architecture and Planning, Office 617, Level 6, Building 421, 26 Symonds Street, CBD, Auckland, New Zealand ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This article investigates the role of hegemonic ideology and the symbolic meaning of Autonomous Vehicle (AV) The society of automobility ownership in the society of automobility. Emerging mobility technologies, including connected shared plat- Autonomous vehicles (AVs) forms and automation, are disrupting urban transportation. There is a pervasive expectation that the utilisation ‐ The ideology of car ownership of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs), by offering an efficient, flexible and affordable on‐demand mobility, Sharing mobility will eventually replace ubiquitous private car ownership. Researchers have mostly considered the transition of Reflexive Thematic Analysis car ownership to SAVs based on positivist‐empiricist approaches. The meaning of the car and its functions are not limited to the instrumental usage that facilitates mobility; instead, the car has other functions such as demonstrating the socio‐economic status of its owner and symbolising his/her subjective identity, which is embedded in the dominant ideology and its symbolic structure. Automobility is a component of hegemonic ide- ology and its symbolic system that has shaped our car‐dependent societies over the last century. The ideological and symbolic functions of car ownership have often been neglected when discussing AVs of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabrielle / TRAVEL for FREE / 1 Gabrielle / TRAVEL for FREE / 2
    Gabrielle / TRAVEL FOR FREE / 1 Gabrielle / TRAVEL FOR FREE / 2 Copyright & Disclaimer Copyright ©2017 by Gundi Gabrielle/HDC Enterprises LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law. Travel for Free While all attempts have been made to verify the information provided in this publication, neither the author, nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions, or contrary interpretations on the subject matter herein. This book is for entertainment purposes only. The views expressed are those of the author alone, and should not be taken as expert instruction or commands. The reader is responsible for his or her own actions. A few affiliate links are included throughout this book. All products recommended have been personally used and tested by the author. Reader or purchaser are advised to do their own research before making any purchase online. Adherence to all applicable laws and regulations, including international, federal, state, and local governing professional licensing, business practices, advertising, and all other aspects of doing business in the US, Canada, or any other jurisdiction is the sole responsibility of the reader or purchaser. Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility or liability whatsoever on the behalf of the purchaser or reader of these materials. Any perceived slight of any individual or organization is purely unintentional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharing Economy
    THE NEW SHARING IT’S TRUE THAT SHARING IS A SIMPLE CONCEPT AND A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF EVERYDAY LIFE. THANKS IN LARGE ECONOMY PART TO THE WEB, IT’S NOW AN INDUSTRY WITH SEEMINGLY A STUDY BY LATITUDE IN COLLABORATION WITH SHAREABLE MAGAZINE UNBOUNDED POTENTIAL. THE NEW SHARING ECONOMY IS ONE INSTALLMENT OF LATITUDE 42s an ongoing series of open innovation studies which Latitude, an international research consultancy, publishes in the spirit of knowledge-sharing and opportunity discovery. PHOTO BYD'ARCY NORMAN Technology is connecting individuals to information, other people, and physical things in ever-more efficient and intelligent ways. It’s changing how we consume, socialize, mobilize— ultimately, how we live and function together as a society. In a global economy where the means of production are becoming increasingly decentralized, where access is more practical than ownership, what do the successful businesses of the future need to know? — What’s changed about our psychology of sharing? — Is money the only, or even the most valuable, currency anymore? — How can Web, mobile and real-time technologies continue to fuel sharing? — What are the opportunity spaces for business owners & future sharing entrepreneurs? 01 THE NEW SHARING ECONOMY I LATITUDE 42 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS THE NEW DRIVERS OF SHARING — More than 3 in 5 participants made the connection between 75% of respondents predicted their sharing of physical objects and spaces sharing and sustainability, citing will increase in the next 5 years. “better for the environment” as one benefit of sharing.* TECHNOLOGY — Online sharing is a good predictor of offline sharing. Every study participant who shared information or media online also shared various things offline — making this group GLOBAL RECESSION — Over the past few years, the significantly more likely to share in the physical world than people who don’t share digitally.
    [Show full text]
  • Ufsc Centro Sócioeconômico Departamento De Economia
    1 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA – UFSC CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS MONAH IDALINA MOREIRA DA SILVA A ECONOMIA COLABORATIVO/COMPARTILHADA COMO INSTRUMENTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO FLORIANÓPOLIS- SC 2019 2 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS A ECONOMIA COLABORATIVA/COMPARTILHADA COMO INSTRUMENTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO Trabalho de conclusão de curso apresentado à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, como requisito para o recebimento do grau de Bacharel em Ciências Econômicas. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Armando de Melo FLORIANÓPOLIS – SC 2019 3 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS A Banca Examinadora resolveu atribuir a nota 9,0 ao aluno Monah Idalina Moreira da Silva na disciplina CNM 7107 – Monografia, pela apresentação deste trabalho. Banca Examinadora: ------------------------------------------------- Prof. Armando de Mello Lisboa -------------------------------------------------- Prof. Carmen Gelinski -------------------------------------------------- Prof. Jonatan Lautenschlage 4 Dedico esse trabalho a minha avó Iracema (in memorian), que me ensinou valores importantes para toda a vida e, que sempre será um grande exemplo de dignidade e caráter. 5 AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço: A minha mãe, por não ter medido esforços para me proporcionar tantas oportunidades, e apesar das dificuldades, sempre me apoiando ao longo de todos estes anos de estudo. Obrigada por demonstrar tanto amor, preocupação e dedicação incondicional, pelas palavras de carinho e de acalento, pela calma, ouvindo meus anseio e por estar sempre disposta a me ajudar, sempre torcendo pela minha felicidade acima de tudo. Sua simplicidade, fé e otimismo me fazem querer ser sempre uma pessoa melhor.
    [Show full text]