DOCSLIB.ORG

103 *ADITYA KUMAR PANDEY & *HARSHIT TIWARI It Is Very Evident

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
103 *ADITYA KUMAR PANDEY & *HARSHIT TIWARI It Is Very Evident SPACE TOURISM – EXPANDING THE HORIZON 1 *ADITYA KUMAR PANDEY & *HARSHIT TIWARI INTRODUCTION It is very evident that after the first successful operational flights the number of tourists willing to go in space will be more and proportionately the tickets for such space flights will also increase. Such increase in demand of interest of tourists will give a boost to the confidence of the commercial space flights to increase the facilities and design of their spacecrafts. Such increase in the market will create a competition among various commercial companies which will lead to enhancement and development of new technology as that is the basis on which they can claim better prices. The companies will focus on increased safety which is the key in commercial flights business. Enhanced performance and increase in the flight time will play a major role as this activity will attract more people and this is what tourists demand. BRIEF HISTORY OF SPACE TOURISM : While tracing history one thing which is evident is that travel has always been a charm for humans. To seek new places is not new for humans and this very habit of humans forms the basis for growth in tourism sector. Today earth became a small place to explore for humans and now humans are exploring outer space. So now the concept of Space tourists is no more a dream rather it is now *4 th Year, B.A.LL.B. (Hons.), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun. 103 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com reality. Since the 1960s, around 450 astronauts have gone into outer space but very few rich individuals have gone into space as tourists. Outer space exercises have grown after Sputnik 1 was launched, humans are on the verge of the next great ‘leap’ into space. In April 2001, Dennis Tito an US national spent six days in International Space Station (ISS) and for the first time any private individual has paid for space travel and for stay in hotel. His trip was confirmed after there was agreement between all ISS partners 2. However NASA was against his visit and said that sending an private individual on ISS would risk other persons. But later after the success of his journey, NASA itself became active in the concept of space tourists. In April 2002, Mark Shuttleworth, from South Africa became the world’s second space tourist to be launched onto the ISS. Then there was an U.S. based scientist and entrepreneur Gregory Olsen. A History was made in Space Tourism, when Fourth space tourist Anousheh Ansari became first female space tourist to enter in space and first astronaut of Iranian slide. 2 The partners in the ISS Project are the US, Russia, Japan, Canada, and 11 Member States of the European Space Agency (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom): see Art. 3(b) of the intergovernmental agreement that formalises the relationship between the ISS Partners, the Agreement concerning Co- operation on the Civil International Space Station, opened for signature 29 January 1998, TIAS No. 12927 (entered into force 27 March 2001) (‘ISS Agreement’). 104 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com WHAT IS SPACE TOURISM ? The term ‘space tourism’ means ‘any commercial activity offering customers direct or indirect experience with space travel’ 3. A space tourist means ‘someone who tours or travels into, to, or through space or to a celestial body for pleasure and/or recreation’ 4. Further it be classified into I. ORBITAL SPACE TOURISM In orbital spaceflight orbital velocity is to be obtained for the space vehicle so that it can fly along the curvature of the Earth. The velocity required to stay in an orbit is called orbital velocity and depends on the altitude of the orbit. For a circular orbit at an altitude of around 200 kilometers, the orbital velocity required is approximately 28 000 kilometers per hour 5. So this very need of high speed makes orbital space flight technically difficult and costly. Orbital public space travel is currently limited to one spacecraft, the Russian Soyuz vehicle. Two times in a year, Russia launches Soyuz on supply flights to the ISS as only two cosmonauts are required to fly the Soyuz, a third seat on each mission is for to probable space tourists. Although the Soyuz is currently the only option for orbital public space travel, other potential, future options exist: 3 Stephan Hobe and Jürgen Cloppenburg,‘ Towards a New Aerospace Convention? Selected Legal Issues of “Space Tourism ”, (2004) 47 Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space 377. 4 Zeldine Niamh O’Brien, ‘Liability for Injury, Loss or Damage to the Space Tourist’, (2004) 47 Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space 386. 5 The orbital altitude of the International Space Station is between 370 and 460 kilometres and its orbital velocity is approximately 27 500 Kilometres per hour: European Space Agency, ‘International Space Station: Final Configuration’ (Fact Sheet No 1, 3 November 2005), available at : <http://www.spaceflight.esa.int/users/downloads/factsheets/fs001_12_iss.pdf >. 105 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com GOVERNMENT SPACECRAFT /P ROGRAMS · Space Shuttle (U.S.) · Shenzhou (China) · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Responsive Access, Small Cargo, Affordable Launch (RASCAL) Program (U.S.) · NASA's 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Program (U.S.) COMMERCIAL SPACECRAFT · K-1 (Kistler Aerospace) · SA-1 (Space Access) · Starbooster (Starcraft Boosters, Inc.) · Neptune (Interorbital Systems SUB -ORBITAL TOURISM A suborbital flight is a trip to space that does not involve sending the vehicle on into orbit. If a spacecraft makes a ballistic trip to an altitude of 100 km (62 miles), basically flying in a wide arc from the ground and back down again, it is called a sub-orbital jump. Below is a partial list of some of the suborbital vehicles under development: SUBORBITAL VEHICLES (AND DEVELOPERS ) · Armadillo (Armadillo Aerospace) · Ascender (Bristol Spaceplanes) · Astroliner (Kelly Space and Technology) · Canadian Arrow (Canadian Arrow) · Cosmopolis XXI (Myasishchev Design Bureau) 106 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com · Millennium Express (Third Millennium Aerospace) · Pathfinder (Pioneer Rocketplane) · Proteus (Scaled Composites, LLC) · SC-1 and SC-2(Space Clipper International) · Space Cruiser (Vela Technology Development) · Starchaser (Starchaser Industries) · Xerus (XCOR) II. INTERCONTINENTAL ROCKET TRANSPORT Intercontinental rocket transport infers a travel through space with a specific end goal to reduce the travel time taken with one point on Earth then onto the next. This idea is alluring for the military and also business transportation space tourists. However, the technical complexity are substantial in terms of the required velocity and requirement for a robust thermal protection system for proper re-entry to the Earth’s atmosphere and this complexity can be best understood by taking the example of Concorde aircraft. PHASES IN SPACE TOURISM Like any type of business, the space tourism will grow upon its inception. With such onset a relatively insufficient and relatively exorbitant- priced ‘pioneering phase’, the prices will go down and range of activities will prosper as it matures PIONEERING PHASE Gordon Woodcock of Boeing proposed "space adventure travel", and it is suitable to depict the first phase. There will be less tourists - from hundreds per 107 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com year to thousands per year; high prices, $50,000 and up; and closer to "adventure travel" than to luxury hotel-style. MATURE PHASE There will be growth of tourists in this phase, thousands of passengers per year to hundreds of thousands per year. Low cost ticker and different airports will facilitate departure facilities. MASS PHASE There will be fall in the price of tickets and the range of tourists will be from hundreds of thousands to millions of passengers per year. LEGAL POSITION OF SPACE TOURISTS The five space treaties which reflect the international law of outer space i.e. Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies 6, Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space 7 , Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects 8, Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space 9, Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space 10 , and sets of principles, namely, Principles Governing the Use by States of Artificial Earth Satellites for 6 Opened for signature 27 January 1967, 610 UNTS 205 (entered into force 10 October 1967). 7 Opened for signature 22 April 1968, 672 UNTS 119 (entered into force 3 December 1968). 8 Opened for signature 29 March 1972, 961 UNTS 187 (entered into force 1 September 1972). 9 Opened for signature 14 January 1975, 1023 UNTS 15 (entered into force 15 September 1976). 10 GA Res 1962 (XVIII), UN GAOR, 18th sess, 1280th plen mtg, UN Doc A/RES/1962 (XVIII) (13 December 1963). 108 Published in Articles section of www.manupatra.com International Direct Television Broadcasting 11 ,Principles relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space 12 , Principles relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space 13 , and Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, Taking into Particular Account the Needs of Developing Countries 14 , make no mention regarding ‘tourists’, but they do consider space travel done by ‘astronauts’, including ‘personnel of a spacecraft’. The Outer Space Treaty considers and places astronauts as ‘envoys of mankind’ 15 , and obligates states for giving ‘all possible assistance’ to astronauts in case of an ‘accident, distress or emergency landing’ 16 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launch Vehicles a 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser
    Small Launch Vehicles A 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser An update to this survey will be presented at the 2016 Internaonal Astronau9cal Congress 1 Agenda Overview of Small Launch Vehicles Launch Method/Locations Launch Performance Projected Launch Costs Individual Rocket Details Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 2 Listing Criteria Have a maximum capability to LEO of 1000 kg (definition of LEO left to the LV provider). The effort must be for the development of an entire launch vehicle system (with the exception of carrier aircraft for air launch vehicles). Mentioned through a web site update, social media, traditional media, conference paper, press release, etc. sometime after 2010. Have a stated goal of completing a fully operational space launch (orbital) vehicle. Funded concept or feasibility studies by government agencies, patents for new launch methods, etc., do not qualify. Expect to be widely available commercially or to the U.S. Government No specific indication that the effort has been cancelled, closed, or otherwise disbanded. Correc&ons, addi&ons, and comments are welcomed and encouraged! Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 3 We did not … … Talk to the individual companies … Rely on any proprietary/confidential information … Verify accuracy of data found in public resources Ø Primarily relied on companies’ web sites Funding sources, when listed, are not implied to be the vehicles sole or even majority funding source. We do not make any value judgements on technical or financial credibility
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Newspace
    THE EMERGENCE OF NEWSPACE 1 THE IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF ENGINEERS IEEE Region 8 SYP Congress 2016 Regensburg, Germany 20 August 2016 Burton Dicht [email protected] 2 Discussion Items • Introduction – My Background and Why I’m Interested in Space • The History of Spaceflight 101 – Understanding How Governments Got Involved in Space • A New Space Age - Understanding the Factors that Created and Shaped NewSpace • Global Space Today and Tomorrow – What does the current Space Landscape Look Like and What About the Near Future? • Job Search Strategies and Resources 3 Some Background on Me and My Interest in Space 4 Apollo 11 – July 20, 1969 Astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the Moon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E96EPhqT-ds 5 My Perspective as a 10-Year Old Full Moon in July 6 How Did They Do That? 7 400,000 Engineers, Scientists and Technicians Made Apollo Possible 8 That Was My Inspiration: I Wanted to Learn How to Do That! High School Space Program – Edwards Air Force Base, Project SPARC 1977 California – 1983 Burt 9 My Engineering Career NASA Intern Facilities Design Kennedy Space Center Lead Engineer Configuration/Systems Integration Northrop Grumman Member of Technical Staff Payload Integration Rockwell STSD – Space Shuttle 10 A Fun Aerospace Career Landing of STS 26 at EAFB – Oct 1988 Arrival of Enterprise at JFK Airport - April 2012 Northrop – Flying with Lockheed friends Open House – EAFB - 1991 11 The History of Spaceflight 101 12 Spaceflight Timeline: The Beginning Sputnik, the first NASA is formed and Alan
    [Show full text]
  • Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Accessible Version GAO-17-609 August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Highlights of GAO-17-609, a report to congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. government spends over a The Department of Defense (DOD) could use several methods to set the sale billion dollars each year on launch prices of surplus intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) motors that could be activities as it strives to help develop a converted and used in vehicles for commercial launch if current rules prohibiting competitive market for space launches such sales were changed. One method would be to determine a breakeven and assure its access to space. Among price. Below this price, DOD would not recuperate its costs, and, above this others, one launch option is to use price, DOD would potentially save. GAO estimated that DOD could sell three vehicles derived from surplus ICBM Peacekeeper motors—the number required for one launch, or, a “motor set”—at motors such as those used on the Peacekeeper and Minuteman missiles. a breakeven price of about $8.36 million and two Minuteman II motors for about The Commercial Space Act of 1998 $3.96 million, as shown below. Other methods for determining motor prices, such prohibits the use of these motors for as fair market value as described in the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory commercial launches and limits their Board Handbook, resulted in stakeholder estimates ranging from $1.3 million per use in government launches in part to motor set to $11.2 million for a first stage Peacekeeper motor.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Traditional Flight Safety Systems and IVHM
    Non-Traditional Flight Safety Systems & Integrated Vehicle Health Management Systems Descriptions of Proposed & Existing Systems and Enabling Technologies & Verification Methods Final Report Produced for: The Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Section AST-300 Produced by: Michael Fudge Thomas Stagliano Sunny Tsiao ITT Industries, Advanced Engineering & Sciences Division 2560 Huntington Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22303 Contract DTFA01-01-D-03013 Delivery Order #3 August 26, 2003 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper describes present and future flight safety systems (FSS) and integrated vehicle health management (IVHM) systems relevant to reusable launch vehicle (RLV) design and operation. FSS design and implementation for RLVs in the launch-regime will be based mainly upon the evolving flight safety infrastructure presently utilized for expandable launch vehicles (ELV)s and the Space Shuttle. The evolution towards a more autonomous “space-based” range is the most significant issue within the RLV launch-phase flight safety paradigm, and the ability to confidently use Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers on both ELVs and RLVs to conduct real-time vehicle tracking and trajectory assessment is the key enabling technology towards this vision. Experiments utilizing sounding rockets to test this technology are currently ongoing. A flight safety paradigm for RLVs in the post-reentry phase of operations (atmospheric powered or gliding-flight ) is postulated in this paper; it is based upon current Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) flight safety practices and designs. The emphasis in this paper is placed upon flight safety for uncrewed RLVs; however, pertinent post-reentry flight safety issues and possible system operations for crewed RLVs are also addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Interorbital Systems Interorbital Systems: Mojave California
    NEPTUNE 30 Micro Satellite Launch Vehicle Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Interorbital Systems: Mojave California Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Liquid Rocket Engine Tests Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com IOS Areas of Specialization Orbital Launch Vehicles Sea Star TSAAHTO Micro Satellite Launch Vehicle (MSLV) Neptune TSAAHTO Manned Launch Vehicle Neptune TSAAHTO Cargo Launch Vehicle Orbital Spacecraft Crew Module Robotic Orbital Supply System (ROSS) Interplanetary Spacecraft Robotic InterPlanetary Prospector Excavator Retriever (RIPPER) Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com IOS Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Neptune 30 Modular System Modular = Simplicity = Reliability = Low Cost Booster Thrust = 4 X 10,000 lbs = 40,000 Lbs SL Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Neptune 30 Modular: New Launch Vehicle Paradigm Stripped-Down and Powerful! YES NO Ablatively-Cooled Liquid Rocket Engines Regen-Cooled Liquid Rocket Engines Blowdown Pressure-Feed Turbopumps and Gas Generators Storable, High-Density, Hypergolic Propellants Cryogenic Low Density Propellants Steering by Differential Throttling Gimbaled Steering Multiple Fixed Low-Thrust Rocket Engines Single Gimbaled Rocket Engine Low Chamber Pressure High Chamber Pressure Single Air Start of One Stage Multiple Air Starts of Many Stages Modular Construction Ullage Rockets Floating Ocean Launch Land Launch Common Propulsion Unit Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Nitric Acid: Von Braun’s Oxidizer of Choice Lutz
    [Show full text]
  • Space Alert Volume V, Issue 4 – October 2017
    Space Alert Volume V, Issue 4 – October 2017 ORF Quarterly on Space Affairs CONTENTS FROM THE MEDIA COMMENTARIES FROM THE MEDIA G39 successes later, PSLV launch fails The Proposed US Space Corps: A Turning WillISRO’s Resume Mars Satellite Mission Launches Successful, by December: India Point for Space Security? ISROMakes Chief History By Daniel Porras ISROISRO searches Inks Deal for with new Chinamakers for of Space rocket parts The US National Defense Authorization Act Isro'sIndia space Offers battery Outer to power Space govt's Expertise e-vehicle to calls for creation of “Space Corps”. With more driveBangladesh and more military resources being invested in U.S. Dismisses Space Weapons Treaty outer space, it is logical that the US would DARPA trying to launch smallsat experiment Proposal as “Fundamentally Flawed” want to consolidate their assets and streamline on an Indian rocket the chain of command. IndiaNASA needs Plans 75 new to satellites Send inSubmarine next 4 years: to Saturn’s Moon GLXP: Enabling Commercial Lunar Isro scientist Explorers OPINIONS ISRO is going AND to ANALYSISlaunch the Chandrayaan 2 By Vidya Sagar Reddy mission on a GSLV MKII in March 2018 Trai, Malaysian Telecom Regulator ink pact The Google Lunar X Prize deadline for Jeff Bezos calls for a dynamic, entrepreneurial completing the mission requirements is now NEW PUBLICATIONS set to end of March 2018. The competition has boom in space been narrowed to five teams to win the grand Plano man admits illegally smuggling U.S. prize of $20 million. The prize is set to open space technology to China, Russia the Moon for commercial exploration, services Russia and US will cooperate to build moon's and exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Dimensions
    Aerospace Dimensions CIVIL AIR PATROL United States Air Force Auxiliary Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Acknowledgments As always, there are many people to thank for their help with this project. Everybody on CAP Headquarters aerospace staff contributed. Thanks for your professional- ism and dedication to CAP and aerospace education. Judy Stone and Joan Emerson graciously supported the International Space Station and Astronomy sections and their expertise is greatly appreciated. I'd also like to espe- cially thank Peggy Greenlee for her wonderful graphic tal- ents and design work that added so much to the final product. I want to sincerely thank the X PRIZE Foundation, Analytical Graphics, Inc., and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for all of the support they give CAP and aerospace education. These organizations are leading the way into the future, a future that includes space. Thanks also go to Col Mike McNeely and CAP Col Drew Alexa for their expertise and dedication to CAP and to ensuring STK being properly included in this module. A special thanks goes to CAP C/COL Andrew Shepherd for dedicating his time and considerable talents to this proj- ect. Finally, I want to thank the leadership team at National Headquarters CAP for their vision and support. For this project that team consisted of Judy Rice, Deputy Director of Aerospace Education; Jim Mallett, Director, Leadership Development and Membership Services; and Colonel Al Allenback, Executive Director, CAP. Without their talents, understanding, and dedication to aerospace education this module could not have been produced. Jeff Montgomery Project Manager Introduction This module discusses current space information and is designed to be a supplement to the six modules of Aerospace Dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • MARYLAND Case Study: the X-Prize
    Case Study: The X-Prize • Overview of requirements • Underlying physics • Competitors U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design X-Prize Rules (synopsis) • Must be privately financed • Have to launch with three people (one crew, two passengers) [For flight test purposes, passengers may be replaced by ballast] • Must reach altitude of 100 km • Must return to launch site • Must make two flights within two weeks • Must be “substantially reusable” (no more than 10% of non-propellant mass replaced between flights) U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Minimum Vertical Trajectory - Losses 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 DeltaV losses (m/sec) 0 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 Sensed Acceleration (g's) Gravity Losses Drag Losses Total Losses U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Advent Launch Services • Sea launched, vertical rocket flight • Recovery? • Plans to scaling to commercial launch U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design ARCA (Romania) • Vertical rocket launch • Parachute recovery into water U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Armadillo Aerospace (Texas) • Vertical rocket launch (H2O2 monopropellant) • Parachute recovery onto land • Sponsored by John Carmack (”Doom”) U N I V E R S I T Y O F Case Study: The X-Prize MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Arrow (Canada) • Vertical rocket
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Space Economy
    Washington State Space Economy September 2018 PREPARED BY: BERK WITH SUPPORT FROM • City of Everett • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Redmond • • Port of Bremerton • Snohomish County • City of Seattle • Suquamish Tribe • Blue Origin • MEMBERSHIP Counties Normandy Park King County North Bend Kitsap County Orting Pierce County Pacific Snohomish County Port Orchard Cities and Tribes Poulsbo Algona Puyallup Arlington Puyallup Tribe of Indians Auburn Redmond Bainbridge Island Renton Beaux Arts Village Ruston Bellevue Sammamish Black Diamond SeaTac Bonney Lake Seattle Bothell Shoreline Bremerton Skykomish Buckley Snohomish Burien Snoqualmie Clyde Hill Stanwood Covington Steilacoom Darrington Sultan Des Moines Sumner DuPont Tacoma Duvall The Suquamish Tribe Eatonville Tukwila Edgewood University Place Edmonds Woodinville Enumclaw Woodway Everett Yarrow Point Federal Way Statutory Members Fife Port of Bremerton Fircrest Port of Everett Gig Harbor Port of Seattle Granite Falls Port of Tacoma Hunts Point Washington State Department of Transportation Issaquah Washington Transportation Commission Kenmore Associate Members Kent Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Kirkland Port of Edmonds Lake Forest Park Island County Lake Stevens Puget Sound Partnership Lakewood Snoqualmie Indian Tribe Lynnwood Thurston Regional Planning Council Maple Valley Tulalip Tribes Marysville University of Washington Medina Washington State University Mercer Island Transit Agencies Mill Creek Community Transit Milton Everett Transit Monroe Kitsap Transit Mountlake Terrace Metro (King County) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Pierce Transit Mukilteo Sound Transit psrc.org Newcastle Funding for this document provided in part by member jurisdictions, grants from U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation. PSRC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]