DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Notes Negotiated Rulemaking – Docket No. 13-0107-2101 Meeting Date: March 25, 2101 Agency Attendees Paul Kline, Deputy Director Kathleen Trever, Deputy Attorney General Owen Moroney, Deputy Attorney General Martha Wackenhut, Assistant Chief, Wildlife Bureau Michael Pearson, Chief, Administration Bureau Jeff Knetter, Upland Game and Migratory Bird Program Coordinator IDFG Administrative Staff (for recording and logistical support) Public Participants Two members of the public indicated interest in attending the meeting. However, no members of the public attended. Notes Documents: • Administrative Bulletin Notice • Rulemaking process review (Powerpoint) • Draft rule text (draft with agency notes distributed March 23 to those identifying interest). IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN March 3, 2021 – Vol. 21-3 Office of the Governor Division of Financial Management Office of the Administrative Rules Coordinator All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America The Idaho Administrative Bulletin is published monthly by the Office of the Administrative Rules Coordinator, Division of Financial Management, Office of the Governor, pursuant to Title 67, Chapter 52, Idaho Code. Brad Little, Governor Alex Adams, Administrator, Division of Financial Management Colby Cameron, Bureau Chief for Regulatory & Legislative Affairs Bradley Hunt, Administrative Rules Coordinator Jason Shaw, Administrative Rules/Publishing Specialist Idaho Administrative Bulletin Page 1 March 3, 2021 – Vol. 21-3 IDAPA 13 – DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 13.01.07 – RULES GOVERNING THE TAKING OF UPLAND GAME ANIMALS DOCKET NO. 13-0107-2101 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PROMULGATE RULES – ZERO-BASED REGULATION NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: In compliance with Section 67-5220, Idaho Code, notice is hereby given that this agency intends to repeal and promulgate rules and desires public comment prior to initiating formal rulemaking procedures. This negotiated rulemaking action is authorized pursuant to Sections 36-103, 36-104, and 36-110, Idaho Code. This negotiated rulemaking action is consistent with Executive Order 2020-01: Zero-Based Regulation, which directs agencies to review all administrative rules over the five year period of 2021-2025 (completing review no later than sine die 2026). MEETING SCHEDULE: A negotiated rulemaking meeting has been scheduled. Additional meeting dates will be posted on the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) website at https://idfg.idaho.gov/about/rulemaking. *PUBLIC MEETING* Thursday, March 25, 2021 @ 6:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) In Person: 15950 N. Gate Boulevard Nampa, Idaho 83687 To sign up for attendance via telephone/videoconference, contact Paul Kline (phone number and email below) by March 23, 2021 METHOD OF PARTICIPATION: Those interested in participating in the negotiated rulemaking process must either attend the above-scheduled meeting or identify themselves to the Department via the below phone number, email, or mailing address in advance of the above-scheduled meeting. Upon conclusion of negotiated rulemaking, any unresolved issues, all key issues considered, and conclusions reached during the negotiated rulemaking will be addressed in a written summary. The summary will be made available on the agency website and to interested persons who contact the agency. Should a reasonable number of persons respond to this notice, additional negotiated meetings may be scheduled and all scheduled meetings will be posted and made accessible on the agency website at the address listed below. A lack of a sufficient number of responses to this notice of intent may result in the discontinuation of further informal proceedings. In any event, the agency has sole discretion in determining the feasibility of scheduling and conducting informal negotiated rulemaking and may proceed directly to formal rulemaking if proceeding with negotiated rulemaking is deemed infeasible. DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The following is a statement in nontechnical language of the substance and purpose of the intended negotiated rulemaking and the principal issues involved: This rulemaking concerns the review of current IDAPA 13.01.07, “Rules Governing the Taking of Upland Game Animals,” in compliance with Executive Order 2020-01. The agency has identified the current chapter contains administrative rules that are duplicated in multiple chapters of IDAPA 13. The agency is thus considering repeal of IDAPA 13, Title 01, Chapter 07, specific to the taking of upland game animals and re-codifying this chapter to include rules that apply to taking of wildlife or of game animals in general, including game management unit descriptions, identification of areas closed in general to the taking of wildlife (excluding fish), requirements for reasonable efforts to retrieve, and the use of the Commission’s proclamation authority for establishing seasons and limits for wildlife (including fish). The agency plans to address methods of take and shooting hours specific to taking of upland game animals in its repeal and recodification of rules for the taking of game birds, as provided in Docket No. 13-0109-2101, included in this bulletin. Idaho Administrative Bulletin Page 21 March 3, 2021 – Vol. 21-3 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Docket No. 13-0107-2101 Rules Governing the Taking of Upland Game Animals Negotiated Rulemaking The Department has identified the following areas as topics for the rulemaking (current IDAPA sections referenced in parentheses), with potential changes to current rule language noted below: • Consolidating rule sections regarding the establishment of seasons and limits by proclamation for the landowner appreciation program (IDAPA 13.01.04.401); upland game animals (IDAPA 13.01.07.400), big game animals (including controlled hunt areas) (IDAPA 13.01.08.700), game birds (13.01.09.600); fishing (including exceptions and regional rule waters) (IDAPA 13.01.11.300); falconry (IDAPA 13.01.14.500); and trapping (13.01.15.750). • Consolidating game management unit and zone descriptions (IDAPA 13.01.08.600-650): * Update road and geographic references, such as Forest Service Road numbers; remove obsolete references. * Evaluate inclusion of Clearwater River islands in Unit 8 instead of Unit 8A. * Change reference in Unit 17 from Mink Creek to Three Links Creek. * Add reference to Murray Saddle for Clarity in Unit 33 description. * Evaluate change in Unit 38-39 boundary to align with expansion of Boise city limits (clarifying current references, which use “to Boise”). * Evaluate change/clarification in Unit 39-43 boundary using Lake Creek and James Creek Roads. * Evaluate change to Unit 40, 41, and 42 boundaries to use Mud Flat and Juniper Mountain Roads. * Evaluate change in Unit 41-46 boundary to move the Diamond A portion from Unit 41 to Unit 46 (corresponding to access from Magic Valley and better alignment with controlled hunt areas). * Change description of Unit 42-43 boundary description to eliminate stray line up Iron Mountain. * Evaluate change of easternmost Unit 45-46 boundary to I-84. * Evaluate change in Unit 49-50 boundary from Copper Creek to the watershed divide. * Evaluate changes in boundaries among Units 53-56-57 among I-86, Yale Road and state Highway 81 (move existing boundaries of Units 56 and 57 north to Interstates I-84/I-86 respectively). * Evaluate change in Unit 60-60A boundary to use Split Butte, Crooked, and Sand Creek Roads. • Consolidating closures applicable to taking of all wildlife (excluding fish) (IDAPA 13.01.07.200; 13.01.08.500; 13.01.09.400; 13.01.16.650; 13.01.17.505): * Potential consolidation of references for closures at individual national parks and monuments into a single reference (with exceptions noted). * Potential consolidation of reference to all state parks (with exception areas noted). • Consolidating provisions related to requirements to make reasonable efforts to retrieve and reduce to possession wounded upland game animals (IDAPA 13.01.07.300); big game animals (IDAPA 13.01.08.400 and 13.01.17.400.03); game birds (IDAPA 13.01.09.450); and furbearing animals (IDAPA 13.01.16.300). ASSISTANCE ON TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, MEETING ACCOMMODATIONS, SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS, OBTAINING DRAFT COPIES: For assistance on technical questions concerning this negotiated rulemaking, requests for special meeting accommodations or accessibility, or to obtain a preliminary draft copy of the rule text (if available), contact Paul Kline at (208) 334-3771. Materials pertaining to the negotiated rulemaking, including any available preliminary rule drafts, can be found on the agency web site at the following web address: https://idfg.idaho.gov/. DATED this 9th day of February, 2021. Paul Kline, Deputy Director Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 S. Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Phone: (208) 334-3771 Fax: (208) 334-4885 Email: [email protected] Idaho Administrative Bulletin Page 22 March 3, 2021 – Vol. 21-3 STATE AGENCY RULEMAKING • Legislation may authorize state agency to adopt administrative rules “to facilitate implementation” of laws Statutes: Idaho Code—(Fish & Game is Title 36) ----------------------------------------------------- • Rulemaking allows more detailed scientific, economic, industry expertise and public to develop requirements (substance or procedure) Idaho Administrative Code: (Fish & Game Commission Rules is IDAPA 13) 1 Rulemaking Process Internal • Initiates rulemaking Memo • 21 day comment period Notice of Intent to Promulgate • Public input process called “negotiated rulemaking” Rules • Fish and Game has robust process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • ITD Board Sets Wish List for Potential Stimulus
    ITD board sets wish list for potential stimulus The priorities include six road projects that wouldn't otherwise be done. None are in the Valley. Idaho Statesman, January 8, 2009 By: Cynthia Sewell Idaho transportation leaders want to spend $94 million on six otherwise unfunded road projects if President-elect Barack Obama and the new Congress pass a stimulus package dedicated to infrastructure. The windfall could create between 2,000 and 4,000 Idaho jobs, officials said. None of the six roads are in the Treasure Valley, but the region's section of Interstate 84 has been getting - and is expecting to keep getting - most of the borrowed federal dollars from the Connecting Idaho project. The stimulus projects officials have identified would upgrade treacherous Idaho 95 in North Idaho and jump-start road projects in Pocatello, Twin Falls and East Idaho. The Idaho Transportation Department board picked these projects during a special meeting Wednesday, and officials say they could be under construction by June. Several versions of possible stimulus bills are circulating in Washington, and details are still sketchy. ITD expects Idaho could receive about $100 million for roads. Agency staff had identified $817 million in projects that could be ready for construction within 180 days. The six board members disagreed on two points on how best to spend the $100 million: Whether to put the money toward new projects or use it to repair the state's existing roads. Whether to divide the money equally around the state or give it to the areas with the most need. Jim Coleman, who represents North Idaho, argued that the state should use one-time money to finance key projects it is unlikely to be able to afford under current revenue sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4: County Profile
    SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE Broome County profile information is presented in the plan and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile provides general information for Broome County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within the County. GENERAL INFORMATION Broome County is a rural community located within the south-central part or “Southern Tier” of New York State. The Southern Tier is a geographical term that refers to the counties of New York State that lie west of the Catskill Mountains, along the northern border of Pennsylvania. Broome County lies directly west of Delaware County, 137 miles southwest of Albany and approximately 177 miles northwest of New York City. Broome County occupies approximately 715 square miles and has a population of approximately 199,031 (U.S. Census, 2011). Broome County is one of the 62 counties in New York State and is comprised of one city, sixteen towns, seven villages and many hamlets. The City of Binghamton is the County seat and is located at the confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. The City of Binghamton is part of the “Triple Cities,” which also includes the Villages of Endicott and Johnson City. With two Interstates and a major state route intersecting in the City of Binghamton, the area is the crossroads of the Southern Tier.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Memorandum Representative Photo
    4101 Yellowstone AvenueCAPIT |AL Chubbuck, MARKETS NET Idaho LEASE PROPERTY 83202 GROUP OFFERING MEMORANDUM REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO TABLE OF CONTENTS Primary Contact DON ZEBE Executive Summary.....................................3 Senior Vice President +1 208 403 1973 [email protected] Property Description....................................8 CBC Advisors 2043 East Center Street Market Overview.......................................10 Pocatello, ID 83201 THE OFFERING CBC Advisors is pleased to extend the opportunity Founded in 1972, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is the largest privately-owned arts-and- to acquire fee simple interest in a 55,000-square crafts retailer with more than 800 stores across the nation. Hobby Lobby offers more foot Hobby Lobby. The lease has a below market than 70,000 arts, crafts, hobbies, home decor, Holiday, and seasonal products. The rent, three 5-year renewal options, and strong company has had strong growth with 63 new stores, which includes 12 relocated rental increases throughout. The asset is located stores during 2017. Hobby Lobby plans to continue its expansion by adding 60 new in Chubbuck, Idaho (Bannock County), which locations and hiring 2,500 new employees in 2018. The Hobby Lobby is included in is in the southeastern portion of Idaho, at the Forbes’ annual list of America’s largest private companies and had December 2016 convergence of Interstate 15 and 86. sales exceeding $4.3 billion. Hobby Lobby is ideally situated as an anchor on the south end of Pine Ridge Mall. Pine Ridge Mall is a 646,000-square foot enclosed mall also anchored by C-A-L Ranch, JCPenney, Herberger’s, and Shopko. Since acquisition in 2013, ownership has invested approximately $28 million in improvements and additions to the mall.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Plain Aquifer Wells Project, Falls Irrigation District
    Finding of No Significant Impact Snake River Plain Aquifer Wells Project Falls Irrigation District, Minidoka Project, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI 18-4 Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to comply with Council of Environmental Quality regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation’s consultation and coordination activities, mitigation and Reclamation’s finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses of the potential environmental impacts of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The project area is located in southeast Idaho near of the City of American Falls in Power County (see EA Figure 1-1), along the southeastern edge of the Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer (ESPA). American Falls is nestled between the edge of the American Falls Reservoir (AMF) and U.S. Interstate 86, approximately 22 miles southwest of Pocatello, Idaho. Falls Irrigation District (FID) operates and maintains Reclamation’s American Falls Division of the Minidoka Project. FID is a contracted space holder at AMF and Palisades Reservoir, which allows it to meet irrigation demand in FID’s 12,620-acre service area. The United States holds natural-flow surface water rights as well as ground water rights for the benefit of FID. AMF has experienced low late-season water levels due to drought, downstream deliveries of water to enhance fisheries, decline in reach gains entering AMF due to groundwater pumping, and increased late season demand by users drawing from AMF.
    [Show full text]
  • I‐80 Tolling Impact Study
    I‐80 Tolling Impact Study Tracy C. Miller, Associate Professor of Economics, Grove City College 10/2/2009 1 INTRODUCTION0B The proposal to implement tolls on Interstate 80 was borne out of legislation commonly known as Act 44. Residents of the Interstate 80 corridor and of the Northern Tier have testified during numerous public events that the plan will impose high costs on businesses and households located within the Interstate 80 corridor. Economic logic implies that it will have a negative impact on some residents of other parts of the state as well. Proponents argue in favor of tolls on 80 because they claim that most of the costs will be borne by drivers of vehicles from other states. This report begins with an economic model of the impact of tolls on businesses and consumers. It identifies some of the major Pennsylvania industries that are likely to be affected by tolls and highlights the costs to people who work in those industries, workers who commute along 80, and consumers. Using information on industry location and goods shipments, it compares the effect of tolling 80 on different regions of the state. It also explores some of the indirect impacts of tolls. These include costs to state and local governments resulting from possible business closings, unemployment, and declining property values as well as the impact on highway safety of more cars and trucks traveling on secondary roads to avoid tolls on 80. This report also discusses the income distributional effects of tolls by comparing income and unemployment rates of the counties that will bear most of the costs of tolls with income and unemployment in the rest of the state and the Pittsburgh and Philadelphia metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVDA-CEDS-2017-2018-Final.Pdf
    2014 -2019 Region IV Development Association Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Proudly serving South-central Idaho: Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding, Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka, and Twin Falls Counties Table of Contents Chapter 1 Building the Pathways ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 Chapter 2 The Region’s Pathways ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2-1 • Dynamic Economies, Empowered People, Vital Communities • Objectives and Strategies ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-2 o Education --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-2 o Healthy Communities ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-2 o Transportation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-3 o Entrepreneurship/Economic Empowerment------------------------------------------------------- 2-3 • Progress on specific Pathways ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-4 Chapter 3 Technical Report – where are we today? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-1 • Background --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-1 o Economy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-2 o Industrial Clusters ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Rural and Urban America PART3OF a SERIES
    August 2010 Transportation Reboot: Restarting America’s Most Essential Operating System The Case for Capacity: To Unlock Gridlock, Generate Jobs, Deliver Freight, and Connect Communities Connecting Rural and Urban America http://ExpandingCapacity.transportation.org PART3OF A SERIES AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS Acknowledgements Much of the material cited in this report, including the estimates of capacity increases required, is drawn from research published in May 2007 by the Transportation Research Board’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). The report, Future Options for the Interstate and Defense Highway System, can be accessed at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/trbnet/ acl/NCHRP_20-24_52Task10_NCHRPFinal.pdf. The objective of the research project was to develop a potential vision for the future of the U.S. Interstate Highway System. The report was prepared by a study team led by David Gehr and Steve Lockwood of PB Consult, Gary Maring of Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Kevin E. Heanue, and Alan E. Pisarski. The research was sponsored by AASHTO and the Federal Highway Administration, and was guided by a panel chaired by Harold E. Linnenkohl, Georgia DOT (retired); and included Allen D. Biehler, P.E., Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT; John F. Conrad, P.E., Washington State DOT; Dr. David J. Forkenbrock, University of Iowa; Dr. Clay McShane, Northeastern University; Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas DOT; Thomas E. Norton, Colorado DOT (formerly); Kenneth Orski, Urban Mobility Corporation; Dr. Bruce E. Seely, Michigan Technological University; MG David A. Sprynczynatyk, North Dakota Army National Guard; and LTG Kenneth R. Wykle, National Defense Transportation Association. The analysis period considered in the Future Options report was the 30 years from 2005 to 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 110/Tuesday, June 9, 1998/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 1998 / Notices 31549 Information on Services for Individuals designations that: (1) specify highway on the Internet at: With Disabilities routes over which hazardous materials http://www.fhwa.dot.gov. For information on facilities or (HM) may, or may not, be transported Section 5112(c) of title 49, United services for individuals with disabilities within their jurisdictions; and/or (2) States Code, requires the Secretary of or to request special assistance at the impose limitations or requirements with Transportation, in coordination with the meeting, contact Mr. Payne as soon as respect to highway routing of HM. States, to update and publish possible. States and Indian Tribes are also periodically a list of current effective required to furnish updated HM route hazardous materials highway routing Dated: June 4, 1998. information to the FHWA. designations. In addition, 49 CFR Joseph J. Angelo, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 397.73(b) requires each State or Indian Director of Standards, Marine Safety and Tribe to furnish information on any new Mr. Kenneth Rodgers, Safety and Environmental Protection. or changed HM routing designations to Hazardous Materials Division (HSA±10), [FR Doc. 98±15425 Filed 6±8±98; 8:45 am] the FHWA within 60 days after Office of Motor Carrier Safety, (202) BILLING CODE 4910±15±M establishment. The FHWA maintains a 366±4016; or Mr. Raymond W. Cuprill, listing of all current State routing Office of the Chief Counsel, Motor designations and restrictions. In Carrier Law Division (HCC±20), (202) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION addition, the FHWA has designated a 366±0834, Federal Highway point of contact in each FHWA Division Administration, 400 Seventh Street, Federal Highway Administration Office to provide local coordination SW., Washington, DC, 20590±0001.
    [Show full text]
  • G2. US Route 6 to NY Route 211
    G2. US Route 6 to NY Route 211 Feature: Southern Shawangunk Ridge Distance: 9.10 miles USGS Map Quads: Otisville Trail Conference Maps: none General Description This section is a mixed bag of ridgetop hiking, abandoned rail beds, an active rail line, and woods roads. This section begins with the trail passing through the Hathorn Lake (Hawthorne Lake on some maps) development to a dead end, where it heads north along the ridge. After a short distance it then de- scends to the active Conrail Port Jervis line, which it follows north for a half a mile. There is one good view across Shin Hollow in this section. Where Shin Hollow Road crosses the Port Jervis line, the trail leaves the rail bed and fol- lows an abandoned section of Shin Hollow Road, which is a nice woods walk- ing section. After about a half a mile, the trail leaves Shin Hollow Road and begins a gradual descent to Guymard Turnpike, paralleling the Conrail Port Jervis line in the woods. After crossing Guymard Turnpike at a bridge over the railroad, the trail descends to the abandoned Erie Port Jervis line. It continues north on the rail bed, which it follows to NY Route 211, where this section ends. (Note: The map in this book still shows the old route.) Access Take the New York State Thruway to Exit 16 (Harriman). Take NY Route 17/future Interstate 86 west to Interstate 84 in Middletown. Take Interstate 84 west to exit 2, Mountain Road. Turn left on Mountain Road and continue a short distance to US Route 6.
    [Show full text]