DOCSLIB.ORG

Sc Institute Giprostroymost - Saint-Petersburg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sc Institute Giprostroymost - Saint-Petersburg SC INSTITUTE GIPROSTROYMOST - SAINT-PETERSBURG 1 The cities where structures have been constructed on SC ‘Institute Giprostroymost-Saint-Petersburg’ projects Murmansk Kaliningrad Riga St. Petersburg Petrozavodsk Kirishi Arkhangel'sk Velikiy Novgorod Cherepovets Ivanov Bor Smolensk Tver' Vologda Moscow Kotlas Nizhniy Novgorod Nadym Perm Khanty-Mansiysk Kerch Samara Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy Kamensk-Ural'skiy Adler Ufa Volgograd Magnitogorsk Astrakhan' Novosibirsk Astana Abakan Ussuriysk Ashgabat Vladivostok Nakhodka ABOUT US 1945 – The company was created from the Design Group of ‘Mostotrest №6’ in USSR in Leningrad 1968 – Design Group was transformed into ‘Leningrad Special Design Department Bureau of Glavmoststroy’ 1986 – ‘Leningrad Special Design Department Bureau of Glavmoststroy’ became Government Company ≪Institute Giprostroymost’ 1994 – Government Company ‘Institute Giprostroymost’. was transformed to Joint Stock Company ≪Institute Giprostroymost’. 2000 – Was formed Joint Stock Company ‘Institute Giprostroymost –Saint-Petersburg’ 2004 – JSC ‘Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg’ was transformed to Stock Company ‘Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg’ Two our main buildings are located in city SC “Institute Giprostroymost - Saint-Petersburg” is the best Design Company in Russian Federation. Institute center not far from Saint Peter & Paul Fortress, has vast experience in the realm of bridge crossings and complicated transportation facilities in different region of in the heart of Saint-Petersburg. The company Russia from Kaliningrad to Vladivostok. Over the years, the Institute has designed more 700 objects of transport has branches in Moscow, Perm, Vladivostok, infrastructure in different regions of Russia, as well as Vietnam, Finland, Latvia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan. Simferopol, Riga (Latvia). Kaliningrad Riga Saint-Petersburg Moscow Simferopol Perm Vladivostok 3 OUR EXPERTISE Design highway bridges underground structures railway bridges embankments and mooring berths combined bridges retaining walls highways reinforced mounds streets and road interchanges buildings and structures of different heights viaducts and flyovers sophisticated floors of buildings and structures transport tunnels foundations in complex environment General Design Development of construction technology of bridge and transport structures Development of projects for special auxiliary construction and devices (SAC&D) Development of method statements (MS) Development of construction method statements (CMS) Development of projects for renovation and repair of bridge and transport structures Design of monitoring systems for complex engineering structures Sophisticated engineering analysis Aerodynamic analysis Development of technical and economic feasibility study Financial estimates Preparation of tender documentation Engineering supervision Protection of intellectual property articles Design of technological solutions for objects of nuclear power engineering and industry and its complexes Development of justification of radiation and nuclear protection 4 СOMPANY RESOURCE Specialists of our company have been awarded by Honorary Letters and Commendations from Governor of Saint-Petersburg, Governor of Primorskiy Territory and from Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Regional Development of Russian Federation. Five specialists of our company are the Honorary Constructors. 1 Total staff 469 Totally 263 certified experts of SC ‘Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg’ are being involved in our creative 2 Higher education 441 scope of works in the area of bridge and tunnels design 3 Candidates of science 3 (including PhD & Doctors). № Index number 1 Design specialists 263 2 Project Managers 67 3 technicians 23 4 IT specialists 8 5 Cost estimate design specialists 12 6 Architects 5 7 Analytical assessment specialists 8 8 Technical Department 16 9 Administrative staff 35 10 field personnel 32 11 Administrative staff 70 6 KEY PERSONS OF COMPANY YURI LIPKIN IGOR KOLYUSHEV Chairman of Board of Directors and Financial Director. Technical Director PhD IABSE & FIB member Education: Education: Construction Engineer ‘Bridges & Tunnels’ Graduate 1959 Construction Engineer ‘Bridges & Tunnels’ Graduate the Petersburg State Transport University. 1980 the Petersburg State Transport University. From 1974 up to 2006 General Director of SC ‘Institute Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg’. From 1985 up to 1990 Engineer of Institute From 2006 Chairman of Board of Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg. Directors and Financial Director From 1990 up to 1997 Project Manager of Institute Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg. From 2006-2014 General Director SC”Institute Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg” ILYA RUTMAN From 2014 - Technical Director General Director Education: Construction Engineer ‘Bridges & Tunnels’ Graduate OLEG SKORIK 1987 the Petersburg State Transport University Experience in construction since 1987 Design Director From 2014 - General Director Education: Construction Engineer ‘Bridges & Tunnels’ Graduate 1997 the Petersburg State Transport University. SERGEY GILBURD From 1994 Engineer of Institute Chief Designer Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg Education: From 1997 up to 2001 Project Manager Construction Engineer ‘Bridges & Tunnels’ Graduate From 2008 Managing Director of SC ‘Institute 1985 the Petersburg State Transport University Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg’ From 1993 Project Manager of SC ‘Institute From 2012 – Design Director Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg’ From 2005 Technical Director of SC ‘Institute Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg’ 7 Staff Training & Skill Improvement Tradition of our enterprise is the good relationship with the Petersburg State Transport University. Outnumber engineers of our Company as well as our management - those who graduate the Petersburg State Transport University. Among them General Director ILYA RUTMAN, Chairman of Board of Directors Yuri Lipkin, Technical Director Igor Kolyushev, Chief Designer Sergey Gilburd, Design Director Oleg Skorik, etc. Chairman of Board of Directors Yuri Lipkin as well is the Chairman of Board of Examination in the Petersburg State Transport University. Dozen our designers as well are tutors at this University – the oldest enterprise in Russian Federation. Vladimir Slivker PhD teaches at St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Lectures and seminars are being conducted within several institutes as well as the Petersburg State Transport University on faculty ‘Bridges & Tunnels’. Courses relating production procedure safety measures are being conducted permanently in Rostehnadzor. New Design and Technology SC ‘Institute Giprostroymost Saint-Petersburg’ is the Design Company being implemented modern technology and methodology in bridge design field. Prestressed and composite structures plus stay cable systems are widely applied in our approach to challenging tasks. Our experience means more than 300 innovations. About 200 innovations were implemented in bridge construction field For the purpose of fulfillment of sophisticated tasks up-to-date technique such as comfortable software and hardware made by GTSTRUDL, STRUCTURE CAD & Midas, LUSAS BRIDGE , XSTEEL TEKLA are available. Our archive allows us to accomplish various tasks and processes in time and cost effective way.Our Analytical Department is being conducted several home softwares. For instance GeomyX & ExpConv to be implemented for cross-section calculations and sophisticated multi level modeling. 8 WORK WITH FOREIGN COMPANIES logotype Companies names Scope of works VSL International Ltd Soletanche Freyssinet Group FIP INDUSTRIALE S.r.l. VINCI Design of load bearing COWI GROUP structural elements DYWIDAG-Systems International Skonto Būve, analysis of structures Tiltprojekts, Tilts technical supervision with design Setec international technology and equipment delivery MAURER AG LNK Group WSP LAP FORCE Technology 9 BRIDGES, ROADS, FLYOVERS Twin bridge crossing the Neva River on ring road around Saint-Petersburg, on site Bolshoy Obuhovskiy Cable-Stayed between Priozerskoe motorway and up to Highway ‘Russia’. Bolshoy Obuhovskiy Cable-Stayed Bridge is the only one not fixed bridges over the Neva River, bridge over the Neva river, connecting Prospect Obuhovskoy Oborony with Oktyabrskaya Embankment. Saint-Petersburg, Russia Project description: Bridge diagram: 2 х 66+174+382+174+2х66 m deck width is 25 m with a height of 2.5 m deck structure composed of two longitudinal boxed girders with bracing deck clearance is 30 m elevation 1 2 194000 2х66000=132000 174000 382000 174000 2х66000=132000 126.00 4 04 86 3 2892 cross-section 24000 1205 5695 5100 2480 2445 3431 929 2715 00 25 15 24 2931 2480 2420 3484 Work on the Project: concept of bridge crossing design of structures design of construction technology design of SAC&D construction management project structural monitoring of construction and service periods technical supervision 10 11 Viaduct Alexandrovskaya ferma, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Project description: Overpass over RR stations Saint-Petersburg - Sortirovochniy - Moskovskiy Prospekt along Alexandrovskaya Ferma. Structure of overpass fulfilled as a continuous steel span of box section with orthotropic slab, steel structure of middle span and back spans out of reinforced concrete. Viaduct has curved form with radius of 400 m. Cable-stayed trusses are within plane along overpass axis. elevation 424700 51200 70000 182300 70000 51200 123 4 pylon 3672 1 2 34 1 780 780 1 cross-section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025
    Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025 Challenges and Opportunities The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) enters into its third decade with commitments for a renewed and deepened engagement between Asia and Europe. After 20 years, and with tremendous global and regional changes behind it, there is a consensus that ASEM must bring out a new road map of Asia–Europe connectivity and cooperation. It is commonly understood that improved connectivity and increased cooperation between Europe and Asia require plans that are both sustainable and that can be upscaled. Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities, a joint work of ERIA and the Government of Mongolia for the 11th ASEM Summit 2016 in Ulaanbaatar, provides the ideas for an ASEM connectivity road map for the next decade which can give ASEM a unity of purpose comparable to, if not more advanced than, the integration and cooperation efforts in other regional groups. ASEM has the platform to create a connectivity blueprint for Asia and Europe. This ASEM Connectivity Vision Document provides the template for this blueprint. About ERIA The Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) was established at the Third East Asia Summit (EAS) in Singapore on 21 November 2007. It is an international organisation providing research and policy support to the East Asia region, and the ASEAN and EAS summit process. The 16 member countries of EAS—Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam, Australia, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and New Zealand—are members of ERIA. Anita Prakash is the Director General of Policy Department at ERIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fortifications on the Coast of the Pacific Ocean
    Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 10, Number 10 The European fortifications on the coast of the Pacific Ocean Nikolay Kasyanov, Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Moscow, Russia Abstract. In the Russian Empire during XIX and early XX centuries, fortresses were built and strengthened along the frontiers. We studied the architecture of the Far Eastern Russian cities-fortresses using as examples Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Port Arthur (now Luishun) and mainly Vladivostok. Coastal fortresses significantly influenced the urban development of the Far Eastern cities. The architectural peculiarity of the fortress architecture at that period was associated with the transition from the brick and stone fortifications to the complex systems of monolithic reinforced concrete. In 1860, a military post with the expressive and geopolitically ambitious name "Vladivostok" ("Possess the East") was established. By the beginning of the XX century, Vladivostok became a rapidly growing city of the European culture and one of the most powerful marine fortresses in the world. The Vladivostok Fortress was an innovative project in early XX century and has distinctive features of the modern style (Art Nouveau), partly of the Russian and classical style in architecture, as well as an organic unity with the surrounding landscape. Plastic architectural masses with their non-linear shape are typical of the fortifications of Vladivostok. Vast and branching internal communication spaces link fort buildings, scattered on the surface and remote from each other. Huge, monumental forts located on the tops of mountains and fitted perfectly in the landscape are successful examples of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Region with Special Needs the Russian Far East in Moscow’S Policy
    65 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’s pOLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer NUMBER 65 WARSAW JUNE 2017 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’S POLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Halina Kowalczyk, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOgrAPH ON COVER Mikhail Varentsov, Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-06-7 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUctiON /7 I. THE SPEciAL CHARActERISticS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AND THE EVOLUtiON OF THE CONCEPT FOR itS DEVELOPMENT /8 1. General characteristics of the Russian Far East /8 2. The Russian Far East: foreign trade /12 3. The evolution of the Russian Far East development concept /15 3.1. The Soviet period /15 3.2. The 1990s /16 3.3. The rule of Vladimir Putin /16 3.4. The Territories of Advanced Development /20 II. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT: ‘THE FLYWHEELS’ OF THE FAR EAST’S DEVELOPMENT /26 1. The energy sector /26 1.1. The resource potential /26 1.2. The infrastructure /30 2. Transport /33 2.1. Railroad transport /33 2.2. Maritime transport /34 2.3. Road transport /35 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2019, № 3 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
    БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2019, № 3 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014–2017 годах именовался «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока» (Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves), ISSN 2227-149X. Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и Дальневосточный морской заповедник — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, д-р биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, д-р биол. наук, проф., Национальный научный центр морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского ДВО РАН (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии, и. о. зав редакцией — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, Дальне- восточный морской заповедник — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачева Анна Вениаминовна, д-р биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, канд. биол. наук, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал, Уссурийск; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, д-р ист. наук, проф., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, д-р биол. наук, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Прозорова Лариса Аркадьевна, канд. биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, д-р геогр. наук, проф., Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, д-р биол.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoplankton in the Coastal Waters of Russky Island, Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan Olga G
    Botanica Pacifica. A journal of plant science and conservation. 2019. 8(1): 133–141 DOI: 10.17581/bp.2019.08112 Phytoplankton in the Coastal Waters of Russky Island, Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan Olga G. Shevchenko1,2*, Anna A. Ponomareva1, Maria A. Shulgina1 & Tatiana Yu. Orlova1 Olga G. Shevchenko1,2* ABSTRACT e-mail: [email protected] The article presents an annotated list of microalgal species in the coastal waters Anna A. Ponomareva1 off Russky Island (Sea of Japan) based on original and literature data. A total of e-mail: [email protected] 254 taxa of microalgae from ten classes are identified. Descriptions and photo- Maria A. Shulgina1 graphic illustrations are provided for the diatom species of the genus Skeletonema e-mail: [email protected] and prymnesiophyta Pseudohaptolina sorokinii, which are rare in the seas of Russia. Information on 20 species of potentially toxic microalgae observed in the study Tatiana Yu. Orlova1 area is also provided. e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: marine, phytoplankton, flora, ecology, Russky Island, Sea of Japan РЕЗЮМЕ 1 National Scientific Center of Marine Biology FEB RAS, Vladivostok, Russia Шевченко О.Г., Пономарева А.А., Шульгина М.А., Орлова Т.Ю. Фи- 2 топланктон прибрежных вод острова Русский, залив Петра Великого, Far Eastern State Technical Fisheries Японское море. В работе представлен аннотированный список микрово- University, Vladivostok, Russia дорослей прибрежных вод острова Русский (Японское море), составленный на основе оригинальных сведений и данных литературы. Обнаружено 254 таксона микроводорослей, относящихся 10 классам. Приведены описания * corresponding author и даны фототаблицы редких для морей России видов диатомовых рода Skeletonema и примнезиофитовой водоросли Pseudohaptolina sorokinii.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    GAZPROM IN EASTERN RUSSIA PRESS CONFERENCE JUNE 18, 2012 Far East Section of Unified Gas Supply System General Development Scheme Yakutsk Yakutsk Sakhalin center Оkha center Komsomolsk- Yuzhno- on-Amur Tynda Sakhalinsk Skovorodino Khabarovsk Sovgavan Blagoveshchensk Chita Zabaikalsk Nakhodka Ulan-Ude Vladivostok MONGOLIA CHINA Ulaanbaatar JAPAN Tokyo DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA Pyongyang REPUBLIC OF KOREA Seoul Beijing Gas production centers Existing gas pipelines LNG/CNG plant and export terminal Gas pipelines being designed and under construction Projected gas processing plants 2 Kamchatka Territory Gas Supply Project Commissioned in September 2010 Gas pipeline length – 392 km BERING SEA Gas pipeline diameter – 530 mm Pressure – 6.37 MPa Annual throughput – 750 million m3/yr First gas supplied to consumers in 2010 Kamchatka Peninsula Zapadno- Kamchatsky licensed block Kshukskoye Nizhne- Kvakchikskoye Sobolevo Yelizovo AGDS Severnye Koryaki AGDS SEA OF Yuzhnye Koryaki AGDS Razdolny AGDS Nachinki AGDS AGDS 2 OKHOTSK Kavalerovskoye AGDS AGDS 1 Apacha AGDS Petropavlovsk- Kamchatsky PACIFIC OCEAN 3 Zapadno-Kamchatsky Licensed Block Hydrocarbon resources of Zapadno-Kamchatsky licensed block 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,621.4 1,200 1,000 Kamchatka 800 Territory 600 400 523.3 200 0 Gas, billion m3 Oil, million t Sredne-Kunzhinskoye field Kshukskoye field Nizhne-Kvakchikskoye field Severo-Kolpakovskoye field Hydrocarbon traps Gas and condensate fields Zapadno-Kamchatsky licensed block 4 First Startup Complex of Sakhalin – Khabarovsk – Vladivostok
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Century
    Make an impact. Public Diplomacy education at USC: Two-year Master of Public Diplomacy (M.P.D.) One-year Professional Master of Public Diplomacy Mid-career Summer Institute in Public Diplomacy for professional diplomats Home of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School, online at www.uscpublicdiplomacy.com • Home of the nation’s first master’s degree program in public diplomacy • Combines the strengths of USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism and Dornsife College’s School of International Relations • Center on Public Diplomacy recognized by the U.S. State Department as “the world’s premier research facility” in the field • Strong institutional relationships with embassies, government agencies and nongovernmental organizations around the world • Innovative perspective informed by Los Angeles’ role as international media capital and key position on Pacific Rim • Energetic and international student body annenberg.usc.edu The University of Southern California admits students of any race, color, and national or ethnic origin. EDITORIAL POLICY Public Diplomacy Magazine (PD Magazine) seeks con- tributions for each themed issue based on a structured solicita- tion system. Submissions must be invited by the editorial board. Unsolicited articles will not be considered or returned. Authors interested in con- tributing to PD Magazine should contact the editorial board about their proposals. Articles submitted to PD Magazine are reviewed by the editorial board, which is composed entirely of graduate students enrolled in the Mas- ter's of Public Diplomacy program at the University of Southern California. Articles are evaluated based on relevance, originality, prose and ar- gumentation. The editor-in-chief, in consultation with the editorial board, holds final authority for accepting or refusing submissions for publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Storm Water Treatment Facilities for Shipyards
    IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Establishment of Storm Water Treatment Facilities for Shipyards To cite this article: L Yakimenko and N Ivanenko 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 459 042056 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.35.234 on 29/09/2021 at 20:57 International science and technology conference "EarthScience" IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 459 (2020) 042056 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/459/4/042056 Establishment of Storm Water Treatment Facilities for Shipyards L Yakimenko1, N Ivanenko1 1Department of tourism and ecology, Vladivostok state university of economics and service, 41, Gogolya St., Vladivostok 690014, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The article demonstrates high level of pollution in the waters and sediments of Ulysses Bay. The pollution can be traced through the sea life vital activity indicators. One of the causes of the negative effects on the bay ecosystem from human use is the lack of storm water treatment by shipyards which operate in the coastal zone and in the waters of Ulysses Bay in Vladivostok (Peter the Great Bay, the Sea of Japan). In this article it has been shown that the organoleptic and chemical indicators for the storm water discharged without treatment into the bay used for fishing activities do not comply to the requirements for storm water quality. The article suggests the design for the storm water treatment facility to be used at the shipyard which was used for the research. The use of the suggested facility – the combined facility for oil and sand interception – would ensure that the amount of pollutants discharged into Ulysses Bay are compliant to the maximum allowable concentration (MAC).
    [Show full text]
  • General Design
    sc Institute Giprostroymost - Saint-Petersburg GENERAL DESIGN Our Company was born in Leningrad (USSR) back in 1945 from the Design Group 'Mostostroy 6' 1968 – 1985 Design Group was transformed into 'Leningrad Special Design Department Bureau of Glavmostostroy'. By this time we had already 400 bridges in service within Leningrad Region, Murmansk Region, Arkhangelsk Region, Novgorod Region and Pskov Region. 1986 – 1999 Back in 1986 we were 'Leningrad Special Design Department Bureau of Glavmostostroy' and further became Government Com- pany 'Institute Giprostroymost'. In 1994 'Institute Giprostroymost' was transformed into Joint Stock Company 'Institute Giprostroymost' and later into Leningrad (Saint-Petersburg) Department. By this period we developed more than 200 projects in Russian Federation, being carried out the design and construction supervision of Hien Liong Bridge, Vietnam, as well as six small bridges in Finland, design completion of Mos- cow Ring Road plus Third Moscow Ring Road, Volokolamskoe Road Interchange, Moscow City. 2000 – 2006 In 2000 was formed Joint Stock Company 'Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg'. In 2004 JSC 'Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg' was transformed into Stock Company “Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg'. From 2001 till 2006 our Enterprise accomplished the design and technical supervision of Bolshoy Obukhovsky Cable-Stayed Bridge over the Neva River on Saint-Petersburg Ring Road, Extradosed South Bridge over the Daugava River in Riga (Latvia), Arch Cable-Stayed Bridge over the Ishim River, Astana (Kazakhstan). 2007 – 2012 From 2007 till 2012 we were the General Designer of the bridge over Novaya Pregolya and Staraya Pregolya Rivers, Kaliningrad and participated in reconstruction of Berlinsky Bridge on Kaliningrad Bypass. SC 'Institute Giprostroymost – Saint-Petersburg' was the General Designer of Cable-Stayed Bridge over the Golden Horn Bay and one of the three designers of the Cable-Stayed Bridge to Russky Island across Eastern Bosphorus Strait, Vladivostok with huge main span of 1,104m long.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and North East Asia - in Times of Globalization
    1. General introduction Focus throughout this text will be on the development in the group of five North East Asian (NEA) countries, Russia, Japan, China, South Korea and North Korea1. The time frame covered will mostly be the years since the late 1990s and with a focus on the development in the years 2003 – 2004. A time period that will initially be used to exemplify a large number of geographic and economic processes that take place in countries generally. It is here shown and explained in a NEA setting. In the background, to all that is being covered, are processes related to the so-called economic “globalization”, along with the Achilles’ heels of this process, trade, energy, and transport. 1.1. A changing world economy As a result of the increasingly global setting of the world economy, with its increased interdependence in-between countries, it is becoming ever more difficult, if not impossible, to really control the economic development for politicians and multilateral organizations. This could, depending upon once personal point of departure, be looked upon as a positive, but also a negative effect. The increased mobility of money is just one such example. This has lead to that short-term speculation, in assets, but more dramatically, in the valuation of currencies, that leads to devastating effects on the economies of entire nations. This was demonstrated on a global scale with the breakout of the so-called “Asian Crises” in 1997. With capital owners having the upper hand in the process, it has become increasingly difficult, not only for companies but also for nations, to try to pursue a development agenda that is anything else than mainstream.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Evraz Annual Report 2009 Main.Indd
    Annual Report and Accounts 2009 Bridging the Infrastructure Gap Contents I. Company Overview 4 VI. Corporate Governance 56 Who We Are 6 Introduction 58 Key Events 7 The Board of Directors and Senior Corporate Structure 8 Management 59 Major Assets 9 The Board (Elected on 17 May 2010) 60 Operations Map 10 Senior Management (As of 31 May 2010) 64 Production by Region 12 Role of the Board 70 Key Performance Indicators 2005–2009 14 Board and Management Remuneration 72 Board Committee Reports 74 II. Messages 16 Risk Management 77 Chairman’s Statement 18 Internal Control 80 81 Chief Executive’s Report 20 Shareholder Information III. Economic and Industry VII. Management Report 86 Overview 22 and Financial Statements Global Macroeconomic Environment 24 Management Report 88 Steel Industry 26 Responsibility Statement of the Directors Iron Ore Market 27 in Respect of the Annual Report and Coking Coal Market 28 the Financial Statements 89 Vanadium Market 29 Selected Consolidated Financial Information 90 Management’s Discussion and Analysis IV. Business Overview 30 of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 93 Our Strategy 32 Consolidated Financial Statements Our Business 34 for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 126 Steel 35 Contents 127 Steel: Russia 35 Independent Auditors’ Report in Respect Steel: Ukraine 37 of Consolidated Financial Statements Steel: North America, Western Europe and for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 129 South Africa 38 Consolidated Financial Statements Mining 41 for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 130 Mining: Coal 41 Parent Company Financial Statements Mining: Iron Ore 42 of Evraz Group S.A. for the Year Ended Vanadium 43 31 December 2009 234 Outlook for 2010 44 Contents 235 Key Investment Projects 2010 45 Responsibility Statement of the Directors 236 Independent Auditors’ Report 237 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 3 4 Minakir.Pdf
    Pavel&MINAKIR& Economic&Research&Ins6tute&FEBRAS,&Khabarovsk& CROSSABORDER&&INFRASTRUCTURE& DEVELOPMENT&& The&20th&Northeast&Asia&Economic&Forum,& Honolulu,&USA& August&7A9,&2011& APEC&–&2012&& • The&next&APEC&summit&will&be&held&in&2012,&in& Vladivostok.& The& main& objec6ve& of& Russia& in& this& summit& is& demonstra6on& of& its& real&status&of&the&"Pacific&economic&powers."& • This& status& implies& the& demonstra6on& of& an& important& role& of& Russia& in& three& major& segments:& A&Mutual&trade& A&Exchange&of&capitals,&technologies&and&people& A&Infrastructure& Russia's'exports'in'2010,%' 7.5' 12.9' 8.1' 3.7' 6.0' 16.0' 4.4' 3.7' Germany' Italy' Netherlands' Poland' France' Turkey' USA' NorthLEastern'Asia' Total&exports&A&U.S.&$&336.9&billion.& China&A&6%,&Japan&A&3.8%,&South&Korea&A&3.1%& Russian&Far&East&Foreign&Trade,&$bln.& 25' 20' 15' Export' Import' 10' Turnover' 5' 0' 2000' 2008' 2010' Russian&Far&East&Foreign&Trade&Direc6ons& Exports' Imports' • '' 6177.7' 764,9' Japan' 5351.9' 885,9' South'Korea' 3033.1' 3910,8' China' 545.8' 809,9' European'Union' 35.2' 635,1' NAFTA'countries' 493.2' 145,0' ASEAN'countries' 57.0' 18,7' CIS'Countries' 202.5' 428,6' Other' Foreign&Investments&to&Russia,&$bln.& 23.8' 45.8' 15.5' 10.7' 8.3' 10.7' Netherland& Luxemburg& China& Germany& Great&Britain& Others& Direct&Investments&–&13.8$bln.,&PoraolioA1.1&$bln.,&Loans&and&Others&–&99.8&$bln.&& Russian&Far&East&Foreign&Investments,&%& 30.1' 39.8' 12.3' 17.8' Nitherland& Luxemburg& NEA&& Others& Investments&totally&–&7.3&$&bln.;&Japan&–&11.1&%,&China&–&0.63%,&ROK&–&0.58&%&
    [Show full text]