DOCSLIB.ORG

01 Evraz Annual Report 2009 Main.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
01 Evraz Annual Report 2009 Main.Indd Annual Report and Accounts 2009 Bridging the Infrastructure Gap Contents I. Company Overview 4 VI. Corporate Governance 56 Who We Are 6 Introduction 58 Key Events 7 The Board of Directors and Senior Corporate Structure 8 Management 59 Major Assets 9 The Board (Elected on 17 May 2010) 60 Operations Map 10 Senior Management (As of 31 May 2010) 64 Production by Region 12 Role of the Board 70 Key Performance Indicators 2005–2009 14 Board and Management Remuneration 72 Board Committee Reports 74 II. Messages 16 Risk Management 77 Chairman’s Statement 18 Internal Control 80 81 Chief Executive’s Report 20 Shareholder Information III. Economic and Industry VII. Management Report 86 Overview 22 and Financial Statements Global Macroeconomic Environment 24 Management Report 88 Steel Industry 26 Responsibility Statement of the Directors Iron Ore Market 27 in Respect of the Annual Report and Coking Coal Market 28 the Financial Statements 89 Vanadium Market 29 Selected Consolidated Financial Information 90 Management’s Discussion and Analysis IV. Business Overview 30 of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 93 Our Strategy 32 Consolidated Financial Statements Our Business 34 for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 126 Steel 35 Contents 127 Steel: Russia 35 Independent Auditors’ Report in Respect Steel: Ukraine 37 of Consolidated Financial Statements Steel: North America, Western Europe and for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 129 South Africa 38 Consolidated Financial Statements Mining 41 for the Year Ended 31 December 2009 130 Mining: Coal 41 Parent Company Financial Statements Mining: Iron Ore 42 of Evraz Group S.A. for the Year Ended Vanadium 43 31 December 2009 234 Outlook for 2010 44 Contents 235 Key Investment Projects 2010 45 Responsibility Statement of the Directors 236 Independent Auditors’ Report 237 V. Corporate Responsibility 46 Parent Company Financial Statements 238 Introduction 48 Abbreviations and Acronyms 257 Economic Prosperity 49 Glossary of Selected Terms 258 Health and Safety 51 Environment 53 Our People 54 I. Company Overview The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 revealed plans to spend US$27.5 billion on highway and bridge construction projects. Evraz’s North American division is one of the world’s largest producers of infrastructure plate which is used for the construction of roads and bridges. Evraz supplied the steel used to build the infrastructure for the APEC -2012 summit to be staged on Russky Island, off the coast of Vladivostok, in the Far East of Russia. The rebars, channels and sheet piles will be utilised in various projects including runway reconstruction at Vladivostok International Airport and the construction of a bridge from Vladivostok to Russky Island across the Eastern Bosphorus strait. Annual Report & Accounts 2009 Evraz Group S.A. Who We Are Evraz Group is a vertically-integrated steel, mining and Evraz’s strategy is focused on achieving ongoing vanadium business and, based on 2009 crude steel improvements in operating effi ciency, cost control production volumes, is ranked the 14th largest steel and synergies derived from asset consolidation, while company in the world. maintaining the Company’s prime positions in the railway and construction steel products markets in Russia and the CIS, the fl at products markets in Europe and the US Our Business and the global vanadium market. Evraz is a global industrial enterprise that spans four continents and employs approximately 110,000 people. The consistent implementation of these strategic objectives During 2009, Evraz produced 15.3 million tonnes of crude continued throughout 2009. steel and sold 14.3 million tonnes of steel products. Self- coverage in relation to the Company’s iron ore and coking coal requirements amounted to 96% and 74% respectively. Our Story Originally founded in 1992 as a small metal trading Our principal activities include the manufacture and sale of company in Russia, Evraz has developed into a steel and steel products, iron ore mining and enrichment, multinational corporation through progressively extending coal production and processing, the manufacture and sale its steel and mining operations around the globe. of vanadium products, trading and logistics. We believe our greatest responsibility to our shareholders, As a leading supplier to major industrial sectors, Evraz our employees, our customers, the communities that we operates in all infrastructure-related steel markets. Evraz is operate within and other relevant constituencies is to the world’s largest producer of rails and one of the leading deliver maximum value while aligning our activities to a producers of construction steel. framework of sustainability that is integral to the ongoing development of our business. Our Vision Evraz remains focused on its primary objective of sustaining the Company’s position as one of the most cost-effi cient integrated steel producing and mining enterprises in the world. 6 Annual Report & Accounts 2009 I Evraz Group S.A. Key Events 2009 January An Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting approved sales of the Company’s steel products to domestic the modifi cation of the method of payment of the 2008 customers. interim dividend. As a result, 9,755,347 new shares were issued in favour of those shareholders who supported the November Evraz exercised control over Vanady-Tula. As 2008 partial scrip interim dividend payment. of 31 December 2009, the Company’s nominal ownership interest in Vanady-Tula was 84.84% February Evraz sold 49% of NS Group to TMK for US$508 million, thereby completing the transfer of IPSCO’s November-December Lenders under syndicated loan former US tubular and pipe businesses. facilities and holders of Evraz notes due 2013, 2015 and 2018 approved amendments of debt covenants, allowing April Highveld agreed to sell 26% of Mapochs Mine to local appropriate headroom and fl exibility to progress Evraz’s partners in accordance with the South African Government’s current strategy. Black Economic Empowerment programme and South African legislation in respect of the mining industry. December Evraz repaid to “Vnesheconombank” (“VEB”) the US$800 million loan granted in December 2008. May The Annual General Meeting of shareholders approved the proposal not to pay a fi nal dividend for 2008. Evraz secured a US$225 million four-year committed Dividend payments will only resume upon sustainable revolving credit facility in respect of Evraz Inc. NA., its market recovery and progress in deleveraging. wholly-owned US subsidiary. June Evraz’s steelmaking capacity utilisation in Russia was 2010 restored to 100% following the resumption of operations March Evraz won the licence to develop the Mezhegey at Blast Furnace No. 3, idled in October 2008, at the Zapsib coking coal deposit (estimated category A+B+C1 reserves steel mill, Novokuznetsk, Russia. of 213.5 million tonnes of hard coking coal) in the Republic of Tyva, Russia. July Evraz raised US$965 million through the issue of US$650 million 7.25% convertible bonds due 2014 and Evraz’s subsidiary, OOO EvrazHolding Finance, US$315 million of new equity. The conversion price for the announced the issue of a 15 billion Rouble-denominated bonds is US$21.12 per GDR, while the issue price of the bond (approx. US$506 million) at an annual rate of new equity was US$16.50 per GDR. 9.25% due in 2013. August Evraz announced the lapse of the option to raise its April Evraz sold the Koksovaya coal mine, a subsidiary stake in Delong Holdings Ltd., the Singapore-listed Chinese of Evraz’s Yuzhkuzbassugol, to the Raspadskaya coal steel manufacturer, from the current 15% to 51%. company in order to derive maximum synergies from the future development of the coal fi eld. September Evraz Inc. NA received a signifi cant Large Diameter Pipe order from TransCanada Corporation in relation May At the Company’s AGM, shareholders approved the to the Keystone Gulf Coast Expansion Project (Keystone XL). Board’s proposal not to pay a dividend in respect of 2009. The number of directors was reduced from ten to nine. October Evraz’s subsidiary, OOO Sibmetinvest, launched a Details of the Board’s composition can be found in the 20 billion Rouble (approx. US$680 million) fi ve-year bond Corporate Governance section. issue at an annual rate of 13.5%. Evraz fully repaid a US$1,007 million loan to VEB utilising Evraz acquired Carbofer Metall, one of the largest a US$950 million loan from Gazprombank which will steel distributors in Russia, in order to increase direct mature in 2015. 7 Annual Report & Accounts 2009 Evraz Group S.A. Corporate Structure Key subsidiaries and jointly STEEL IRON ORE COAL VANADIUM SALES, SERVICES controlled AND LOGISTICS entities as of 31 December 2009 COKE a e North Evraz Inc. NA* 100% Stratcor* 72.84% America Evraz Inc. NA b Canada* 100% Europe NTMK 100% KGOK 100% Dneprokoks 98.65% Nikom 100% TC EvrazHolding 100% f Palini e Bertoli 100% VGOK 100% Bagleykoks 94.37% Evraztrans 76% Vítkovice*100% Sukha Balka 99.42% DKHZ 93.86% East Metals 100% DMZ 96.03% EvrazMetall 100% g Asia Zapsib 100% Evrazruda 100% Yuzhkuzbassugol Vanady-Tula 84.84% Nakhodka Sea Port 100% 100% NKMK 100% d Raspadskaya 40% EvrazEK 100% Sinano 100% MEF 100% c Africa Highveld* 85.12% * Interests in Canadian plate and pipe d 40% interest in subsidiaries marked business, comprises Raspadskaya is held by its with an asterisk (*) are a steelmaking and management, while 20% held directly by Evraz rolling mill in Regina is free fl oat. Group S.A., the parent (Saskatchewan), tubular company operations in Regina, e Strategic Minerals Calgary and Red Deer Corporation comprises a Evraz Inc. NA (Alberta), a cut-to-length two divisions: Stratcor, Hot headquartered in processing centre in Surrey Springs (Arkansas, USA) Portland (Oregon, (British Columbia) and a and Vametco Alloys, Brits USA) incorporates steel sales offi ce in Calgary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • We Want to Help the World Reach Net Zero and Improve People's Lives
    BP Sustainability Report 2019 Our purpose is reimagining energy for people and our planet. We want to help the world reach net zero and improve people’s lives. We will aim to dramatically reduce carbon in our operations and production and grow new low carbon businesses, products and services. We will advocate for fundamental and rapid progress towards Paris and strive to be a leader in transparency. We know we don’t have all the answers and will listen to and work with others. We want to be an energy company with purpose; one that is trusted by society, valued by shareholders and motivating for everyone who works at BP. We believe we have the experience and expertise, the relationships and the reach, the skill and the will, to do this. Introduction Message from Bernard Looney 2 Our ambition 4 2019 at a glance Energy in context 8 Sustainability at BP UN Sustainable Development Goals 11 Sustainability at BP 11 Key sustainability issues 14 Our focus areas Climate change and the energy transition 16 Our role in the energy transition 18 Our ‘reduce, improve, create’ framework 20 Accrediting our lower carbon activities 22 Reducing emissions in our operations 23 Improving our products 26 Creating low carbon businesses 30 Safety 36 Process safety 38 Personal safety 39 Safety performance 41 Our value to society 42 Creating social value 44 Social investment 45 Local workers and suppliers 46 Human rights 47 Community engagement 48 Our impact on communities 49 Labour rights 50 Doing business responsibly Environment 54 People 60 Business ethics 68 Navigating our reports Governance Our quick read Human rights governance 74 provides a summary of the Executive oversight of sustainability 74 Sustainability Report, including key Managing risks 75 highlights and performance in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Factsheet
    FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance European Metals Holdings EMH Industrial Metals and Mining — GBP 0.69 at close 14 May 2021 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 1.1 450 900 1D WTD MTD YTD 1 Absolute 0.0 -6.8 -4.2 7.8 400 800 Rel.Sector 1.2 -2.9 -7.5 -20.3 0.9 700 Rel.Market -1.1 -5.5 -4.8 -1.3 350 0.8 600 300 0.7 VALUATION 500 0.6 250 400 Trailing Relative Price Relative 0.5 Price Relative 200 300 PE -ve 0.4 Absolute Price (local currency) (local Price Absolute 150 EV/EBITDA -ve 200 0.3 PB 12.3 100 0.2 100 PCF -ve 0.1 50 0 Div Yield 0.0 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 Price/Sales +ve Absolute Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Net Debt/Equity 0.0 100 90 90 Div Payout 0.0 90 80 80 ROE -ve 80 70 70 70 Index) Share Share Sector) Share - - 60 60 60 DESCRIPTION 50 50 50 40 40 40 The Company is focusing in tin mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • H-1B Petition Approvals for Initial Benefits by Employers FY07
    NUMBER OF H-1B PETITIONS APPROVED BY USCIS FOR INITIAL BENEFICIARIES FY 2007 Approved Employer Petitions INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED 4,559 WIPRO LIMITED 2,567 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES LTD 1,396 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS US CORP 962 MICROSOFT CORP 959 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 797 PATNI COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 477 US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES LLC 416 I-FLEX SOLUTIONS INC 374 INTEL CORPORATION 369 ACCENTURE LLP 331 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 324 ERNST & YOUNG LLP 302 LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED 292 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 283 GOOGLE INC 248 MPHASIS CORPORATION 248 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO 246 AMERICAN UNIT INC 245 JSMN INTERNATIONAL INC 245 OBJECTWIN TECHNOLOGY INC 243 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 242 PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHS 238 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 236 MOTOROLA INC 234 MARLABS INC 229 KPMG LLP 227 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO 224 TECH MAHINDRA AMERICAS INC 217 VERINON TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LTD 213 THE JOHNS HOPKINS MED INSTS OIS 205 YASH TECHNOLOGIES INC 202 ADVANSOFT INTERNATIONAL INC 201 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 199 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 196 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 192 POLARIS SOFTWARE LAB INDIA LTD 191 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 191 EVEREST BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC 190 IBM CORPORATION 184 APEX TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 174 NEW YORK CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 171 SOFTWARE RESEARCH GROUP INC 167 EVEREST CONSULTING GROUP INC 165 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 163 GSS AMERICA INC 160 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 158 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 151 MASCON GLOBAL CONSULTING INC 150 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 149 THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 147 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 146 COLUMBIA
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025
    Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025 Challenges and Opportunities The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) enters into its third decade with commitments for a renewed and deepened engagement between Asia and Europe. After 20 years, and with tremendous global and regional changes behind it, there is a consensus that ASEM must bring out a new road map of Asia–Europe connectivity and cooperation. It is commonly understood that improved connectivity and increased cooperation between Europe and Asia require plans that are both sustainable and that can be upscaled. Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities, a joint work of ERIA and the Government of Mongolia for the 11th ASEM Summit 2016 in Ulaanbaatar, provides the ideas for an ASEM connectivity road map for the next decade which can give ASEM a unity of purpose comparable to, if not more advanced than, the integration and cooperation efforts in other regional groups. ASEM has the platform to create a connectivity blueprint for Asia and Europe. This ASEM Connectivity Vision Document provides the template for this blueprint. About ERIA The Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) was established at the Third East Asia Summit (EAS) in Singapore on 21 November 2007. It is an international organisation providing research and policy support to the East Asia region, and the ASEAN and EAS summit process. The 16 member countries of EAS—Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam, Australia, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and New Zealand—are members of ERIA. Anita Prakash is the Director General of Policy Department at ERIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fortifications on the Coast of the Pacific Ocean
    Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 10, Number 10 The European fortifications on the coast of the Pacific Ocean Nikolay Kasyanov, Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Moscow, Russia Abstract. In the Russian Empire during XIX and early XX centuries, fortresses were built and strengthened along the frontiers. We studied the architecture of the Far Eastern Russian cities-fortresses using as examples Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Port Arthur (now Luishun) and mainly Vladivostok. Coastal fortresses significantly influenced the urban development of the Far Eastern cities. The architectural peculiarity of the fortress architecture at that period was associated with the transition from the brick and stone fortifications to the complex systems of monolithic reinforced concrete. In 1860, a military post with the expressive and geopolitically ambitious name "Vladivostok" ("Possess the East") was established. By the beginning of the XX century, Vladivostok became a rapidly growing city of the European culture and one of the most powerful marine fortresses in the world. The Vladivostok Fortress was an innovative project in early XX century and has distinctive features of the modern style (Art Nouveau), partly of the Russian and classical style in architecture, as well as an organic unity with the surrounding landscape. Plastic architectural masses with their non-linear shape are typical of the fortifications of Vladivostok. Vast and branching internal communication spaces link fort buildings, scattered on the surface and remote from each other. Huge, monumental forts located on the tops of mountains and fitted perfectly in the landscape are successful examples of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Region with Special Needs the Russian Far East in Moscow’S Policy
    65 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’s pOLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer NUMBER 65 WARSAW JUNE 2017 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’S POLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Halina Kowalczyk, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOgrAPH ON COVER Mikhail Varentsov, Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-06-7 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUctiON /7 I. THE SPEciAL CHARActERISticS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AND THE EVOLUtiON OF THE CONCEPT FOR itS DEVELOPMENT /8 1. General characteristics of the Russian Far East /8 2. The Russian Far East: foreign trade /12 3. The evolution of the Russian Far East development concept /15 3.1. The Soviet period /15 3.2. The 1990s /16 3.3. The rule of Vladimir Putin /16 3.4. The Territories of Advanced Development /20 II. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT: ‘THE FLYWHEELS’ OF THE FAR EAST’S DEVELOPMENT /26 1. The energy sector /26 1.1. The resource potential /26 1.2. The infrastructure /30 2. Transport /33 2.1. Railroad transport /33 2.2. Maritime transport /34 2.3. Road transport /35 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Ftse4good UK 50
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE4Good UK 50 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.81 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 5.08 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.67 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 2.56 UNITED Halma 0.74 UNITED Rio Tinto 4.68 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.36 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 6.17 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 4.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.56 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.64 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 3.75 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 8.25 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.47 UNITED Schroders 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1.15 UNITED Intertek Group 0.65 UNITED Segro 0.95 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Barclays 2.1 UNITED Legal & General Group 1.1 UNITED Smith & Nephew 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.2 UNITED Lloyds Banking Group 2.39 UNITED Smurfit Kappa Group 0.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BT Group 1.23 UNITED London Stock Exchange Group 2.09 UNITED Spirax-Sarco Engineering 0.72 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.6 UNITED Mondi 0.67 UNITED SSE 1.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Coca-Cola HBC AG 0.37 UNITED National Grid 2.37 UNITED Standard Chartered 0.85 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Compass Group 1.96 UNITED Natwest Group 0.77 UNITED Tesco 1.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM CRH 2.08 UNITED Next 0.72 UNITED Unilever 7.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Organizations
    PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS Company Name Company Name Company Name Company Name Company Name ABB City and County of Denver Hewlett Packard Enterprise Nextworld Shell ABS Cobham Semiconductor Solutions Hitachi Consulting NLMK Shimmick Construction Advanced Micro Devices Coeur Mining Holland & Hart LLP Noble Energy Sierra Nevada Corporation AECOM CollegeDrive Test Prep and Tutoring HollyFrontier Northrop Grumman Corporation SM Energy Aera Energy LLC Collimare LLC HomeAdvisor Northwestern Mutual Solar Turbines, Inc Colorado Department of Transporta- Alarm.com Hunting Titan Nucor Steel Southwestern Energy tion Alight, Inc. Colorado Law Illinois Institute of Technology Oasis Petroleum Spectranetics Allegion Colorado Lighting, Inc IM Flash Occidental Petroleum Corporation Stanley Consultants, Inc. AMERICAN Cast Iron Pipe Company CO School of Mines Graduate Studies IMERYS Olin Corporation Statoil Ames Construction Computronix, Inc. IMI Precision Engineering Olsson Associates Stillwater Mining Company Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Condon - Johnson & Associates, Inc. Intelligent Software Solutions OppenheimerFunds Summit Materials Andeavor Connexta J.R. Butler, Inc. ORAU - Maryland Office SUNDT Apache Corp. ConocoPhillips Jacobs Orbital ATK TEAM-UP: Teacher Education Alliance Apex Engineers, Inc. Covenant Testing Technologies, LLC. Johns Manville Orica Tenaris Applied Control Equipment, LLLP Credera Jviation, Inc. OSIsoft Texas Instruments Arcadis, Inc. CTL Thompson, Inc. Kahuna Ventures LLC Parsons The RMH Group Inc. ArcelorMittal Daily Thermetrics Kansas Department of Transportation Pathfinder Systems Inc The Trade Desk Arch Coal, Inc. Dal-Tile Corp. Keane Group PDC Energy The Vertex Companies, Inc. ARCO/Murray National Construction Davidson Technologies Inc. Kenzan Peabody Energy Tierra Group International, Ltd. Arista Networks DENSO International America, Inc. Kiewit Peace Corps TimkenSteel Corporation APS- Palo Verde Generating Station DPS - Denver Teacher Residency Kimley-Horn Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Traylor Bros., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Strategy – a Five Year Plan for Promoting Economic Growth and Job Creation, and Recommend Adoption by City Council
    PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Portland, Oregon RESOLUTION NO. 6714 ENDORSE THE CITY OF PORTLAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY – A FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR PROMOTING ECONOMIC GROWTH AND JOB CREATION, AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the City of Portland’s (the “City’s”) existing economic development strategy was completed in 2002; WHEREAS, since that time, many of the local, national and international circumstances and conditions that drive Portland’s economy have changed; WHEREAS, the Mayor called for the creation of a new five year economic development strategy (the “Strategy”) for the City; WHEREAS, the Portland Development Commission (“PDC”) led the drafting of the Strategy; WHEREAS, the process to develop and create the Strategy included meetings with stakeholder groups throughout the City and the region to provide input and recommendations on the Strategy and its goals and action items; WHEREAS, the Strategy sets the goal for the City to be the most sustainable economy in the United States; WHEREAS, the City has a unique competitive position to meet this goal due to an existing concentration of firms in clean technology and sustainable industries; years of recognized leadership in all facets of sustainable living – green building, transit, land use, recycling, and bicycle use; and a supportive state and local policy environment; WHEREAS, the Strategy will guide Portland’s economic growth over the next five years and direct the investment necessary to achieve the objectives of the sustainable economy with an equal focus
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule F - Creditors Holding Unsecured Nonpriority Claims
    B6F (Official Form 6F) (12/07) In re Aleris International, Inc. , Case No. 09-10478 (BLS) Debtor (if known) SCHEDULE F - CREDITORS HOLDING UNSECURED NONPRIORITY CLAIMS State the name, mailing address, including zip code, and last four digits of any account number, of all entities holding unsecured claims without priority against the debtor or the property of the debtor, as of the date of filing of the petition. The complete account number of any account the debtor has with the creditor is useful to the trustee and the creditor and may be provided if the debtor chooses to do so. If a minor child is a creditor, state the child’s initials and the name and address of the child’s parent or guardian, such as “A.B., a minor child by John Doe, guardian.” Do not disclose the child’s name. See 11 U.S.C. § 112. and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(m). Do not include claims listed in Schedules D and E. If all creditors will not fit on this page, use the continuation sheet provided. If any entity other than a spouse in a joint case may be jointly liable on a claim, place an "X" in the column labeled "Codebtor," include the entity on the appropriate schedule of creditors, and complete Schedule H - Codebtors. If a joint petition is filed, state whether the husband, wife, both of them, or the marital community may be liable on each claim by placing an "H," "W," "J," or "C" in the column labeled "Husband, Wife, Joint, or Community." If the claim is contingent, place an "X" in the column labeled "Contingent." If the claim is unliquidated, place an "X" in the column labeled "Unliquidated." If the claim is disputed, place an "X" in the column labeled "Disputed." (You may need to place an "X" in more than one of these three columns.) Report the total of all claims listed on this schedule in the box labeled "Total" on the last sheet of the completed schedule.
    [Show full text]