DOCSLIB.ORG

Zzmcbooklet2ndedenwebedition.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Game design and rules: Karol Madaj Text: prof. dr hab. Michał Polak Symbol selection and editing: dr Tomasz Ginter, prof. dr hab. Michał Polak Biographies: dr hab. Marek Gałęzowski (MG), dr Barbara Męczykowska (BM), Karol Litwin (KL) Reviewer: ppłk. dr Krzysztof Gaj Editing: Piotr Chojnacki, Anna Zawadzka, Magdalena Baj, Zofia Krzywicka-Vauthier Translation: Anna Brojer, Jason Franzen, Andrzej Lipson, dr Łukasz Michalski, Jerzy Giebułtowski, Russ Williams Graphic design and typesetting: Tomasz Ginter, Łukasz M. Pogoda Illustrations: Tomasz Ginter, The Institute of National This game teaches recognition of historical symbols. Remembrance Archives, Polish Army Museum, Each pair of cards always has one symbol in common. Imperial War Museum, Fundacja Niepodległości, The goal is to find it and name it as quickly as possible. Wikipedia Commons and private collections Maps: Tomasz Ginter Game components Printed by: Trefl This game reimplements “ZnajZnak” published in 2012 132 playing cards Text based on: ZnajZnak – Monte Cassino Pomnik 3 Dywizji Strzelców The 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division Karpackich Monument Polski Cmentarz Wojenny Polish War Cemetery na Monte Cassino at Monte Cassino Maps based on: Matthew Parker, Monte Cassino: the story of Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) the hardest-fought battle of World War Two Plut. Emil Czech Corporal Emil Czech Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) Gen. por. Wilhelm Schmalz (1901–1983) Lt. Gen. Wilhelm Schmalz (1901–1983) © Instytut Pamięci Narodowej – Flaga Wielkiej Brytanii (Union Jack) Flag of Great Britain (Union Jack) Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Pułk 4 Pancerny „Skorpion” 4th Armored Regiment “Scorpion” Legia Zasługi Legion of Merit Narodowi Polskiemu, 2019 Czołg M3A3 Stuart M3A3 Stuart Tank Sowiecki pociąg deportacyjny Soviet deportation train 2 Grupa Artylerii 2nd Artillery Group National Education Office C 65 ul. Wołoska 7, 02-675 Warszawa, Poland front (symbols) back (descriptions) PDF: ISBN 978-83-8098-615-2 l Second extended edition 1 How to read the cards? Whoever first finds the common symbol says its 3 name aloud, then moves their own card to the top Example card (back) of the stack in the center. If the player does not know the symbol’s name, then they must spend valuable Small Symbol definitions seconds to turn the card over and read aloud the symbols symbol’s name (printed on the back). Pomnik 3 Dywizji Strzelców The 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division Karpackich Monument Polski Cmentarz Wojenny Polish War Cemetery na Monte Cassino at Monte Cassino Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) The game ends when someone has moved their last Plut. Emil Czech Corporal Emil Czech card to the center stack. Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) 4 Letter of the Gen. por. Wilhelm Schmalz (1901–1983) Lt. Gen. Wilhelm Schmalz (1901–1983) card set Flaga Wielkiej Brytanii (Union Jack) Flag of Great Britain (Union Jack) Pułk 4 Pancerny „Skorpion” 4th Armored Regiment “Scorpion” (here: set C) Legia Zasługi Legion of Merit Czołg M3A3 Stuart M3A3 Stuart Tank Pomnik 3 Dywizji Strzelców The 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division Karpackich Sowiecki pociąg deportacyjnyMonumentSoviet deportation train Symbol 2 Grupa Artylerii 2nd Artillery Group Polski Cmentarz Wojenny Polish War Cemetery 65 na Monte Cassino Cat Monte Cassino Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) Gen. Kazimierz Sosnkowski (1885–1969) Plut. Emil Czech Corporal Emil Czech Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) Gen. Alphonse Juin (1888–1967) Name ofGen. the por. symbol Wilhelm Schmalz (Polish) (1901–1983) NameLt. Gen. Wilhelm of the Schmalz symbol (1901–1983) (English) Flaga Wielkiej Brytanii (Union Jack) Flag of Great Britain (Union Jack) Warm-upPułk 4 Pancerny (2–8 „Skorpion” players) 4th Armored Regiment “Scorpion” Legia Zasługi Legion of Merit Deal the cards equally among the players. 1 EachCzołg M3A3 player Stuart stacks their ownM3A3 cardsStuart Tank face up. Sowiecki pociąg deportacyjny Soviet deportation train The2 Grupa youngest Artylerii player puts 2thend Artillery card Group from the top of 2 their stack into the center of the playing area. From65 now on,C all players simultaneously search for the common symbol which appears both on the top card of their own stack card and the stack in the center. 2 3 Duel (from 1 to 13 pairs of players) Whoever finds it first says “Stop!”, points to the common 3 symbol, and says its name. Players sit together in pairs to play. Each player is dealt five cards and holds them in their hand, in a face-up stack. 1 STOP! “Christmas tree” Each player in a pair simultaneously puts the card from the 2 bottom of their stack onto the table. Both players look for the After naming the symbol (or saying “I don’t know”), common symbol appearing on both cards. 4 the player turns their card over and reads aloud the symbol’s name (printed on the back). 3 Dywizja Strzelców Karpackich 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division Flaga Stanów Zjednoczonych Flag of the United States of America 3 Dywizja Strzelców Karpackich 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division 13 Wileński Batalion Strzelców „Rysie” 13th Wilno “Lynx” Ri e Batalion Flaga Stanów Zjednoczonych Flag of the United States of America 13 Wileński Batalion Strzelców „Rysie” 13th Wilno “Lynx” Ri e Batalion Wzgórze Monte Calvario, 593Wzgórze Monte Calvario, Monte 593 Calvario, Monte Calvario, Hill Hill 593 593 Naszywka rozpoznawcza Patch of the Polish 2 Brygady Pancernej 2nd Armored Brigade Naszywka rozpoznawcza Patch of theth Polish 2 Brygady Pancernej Pułk 4 Pancerny „Skorpion”2nd Armored 4 Armored Brigade Regiment “Scorpion” Krzyż św. Benedykta Saint Benedict’s Cross Pułk 4 Pancerny „Skorpion” 15 Wileński Batalion4th Strzelców Armored „Wilki” 15th WilnoRegiment “Wolves” Ri e Battalion “Scorpion” Sztandar 5 Kresowej Dywizji Piechoty 5th Kresovian Infantry Division banner 16 Lwowski Batalion Strzelców 16th Lviv Ri e Batalion Krzyż św. Benedykta Saint Benedict’s Cross Czołg M4A2 Sherman III M4A2 Sherman III tank Flaga Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej Flag of the Republic of Poland 15 Wileński Batalion Strzelców „Wilki” 15Jth Wilno “Wolves” Ri e Battalion4 4 Sztandar 5 Kresowej Dywizji Piechoty 5th Kresovian Infantry5 Division banner 16 Lwowski Batalion Strzelców 16th Lviv Ri e Batalion Czołg M4A2 Sherman III M4A2 Sherman III tank Flaga Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej Flag of the Republic of Poland J 4 If the player did not correctly name the symbol (or said Multiplayer variant (3–8 players) 5 “I don’t know”), then they take their card from the table and put it on top of their stack, face up. Then they put the card from the Deal five cards to each player. Each player holds their cards bottom of their stack onto the table, and the game continues. 1 in their hand, in a face-up stack. Players should all sit so that each player can clearly see the cards of the player on their WRONG! left. Each player covers their stack with their second hand. At the “start” command, all players uncover their own 2 stacks and search for the common symbol on their own stack and on the stack of the player on their left. If the player correctly named the symbol, then they give their card 6 to the opponent, who puts it on top of their own stack, face up. Then the player who correctly named the symbol puts the card from the bottom of their stack onto the table, and the game continues. “3rd Carpathian Rifle Division” RIGHT! The game ends when one player has no cards left in their 7 hand and is the first to find the common symbol on the two cards on the table. As an exception to the normal rule, the player does not have to name this last symbol. 7 Whoever first finds the common symbol says “stop”, If the player did not correctly name the symbol 3 points to the symbol, and says its name. During this time, all 5 (or said “I don’t know”), then they move their other players except these two cover their own stacks. card from the top of their stack to the bottom, say “start”, and the game continues. STOP! “Bugler” WRONG! After naming the symbol (or saying “I don’t 4 know”), the player turns their card over and reads aloud the symbol’s name (printed on the back). Odznaka bojowa Strzelca Spadochrono- Luftwa e paratrooper wego (Fallschirmjäger) Luftwa e (Fallschirmjäger) combat badge Flaga Indii Brytyjskich (1880–1947) Star of India (1880–1947) Żołnierz niemiecki German soldier Plut. Emil Czech Corporal Emil Czech 3 Dywizja Strzelców Karpackich 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division 15 Grupa Armii 15th Army Group Hinduska 4 Dywizja Piechoty Indian 4th Infantry Division Jan Gazur (1925–2011) Jan Gazur (1925–2011) Francuski Korpus Ekspedycyjny French Expeditionary Corps in Italy Odznaka bojowa Strzelcawe Włoszech Spadochrono- Luftwa e paratrooper wego (Fallschirmjäger)Czerwone Luftwa maki e (Fallschirmjäger)Red poppies combat badge Polskie Siły Zbrojne na Zachodzie Polish Armed Forces in the West Flaga Indii Brytyjskich (1880–1947) Star of India (1880–1947) 1 batalion 9 Pułku Gurkhów 1st Battalion, 9th Gurkha Regiment 58 Żołnierz niemiecki KGerman soldier Plut. Emil Czech Corporal Emil Czech 3 Dywizja Strzelców Karpackich 3rd Carpathian Ri e Division 9 15 Grupa Armii 15th Army Group Hinduska 4 Dywizja Piechoty Indian 4th Infantry Division Jan Gazur (1925–2011) Jan Gazur (1925–2011) Francuski Korpus Ekspedycyjny we Włoszech French Expeditionary Corps in Italy Czerwone maki Red poppies Polskie Siły Zbrojne na Zachodzie Polish Armed Forces in the West 1 batalion 9 Pułku Gurkhów 1st Battalion, 9th Gurkha Regiment K 58 If the player correctly named the symbol, then they The game ends when someone names the common 6 give their card from the top of their stack to the player 7 symbol on their last card. As an exception to the normal on their left, who puts it on the bottom of their own rule, the player does not have to name this last symbol.
Recommended publications
  • Central and Southern Italy Campania, Molise, Abruzzo, Marche, Umbria and Lazio Garigliano

    Central and Southern Italy Campania, Molise, Abruzzo, Marche, Umbria and Lazio Garigliano

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY DIRECTORATE D - Nuclear Safety and Fuel Cycle Radiation Protection Main Conclusions of the Commission’s Article 35 verification NATIONAL MONITORING NETWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY Central and Southern Italy Campania, Molise, Abruzzo, Marche, Umbria and Lazio DISCHARGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Garigliano NPP Date: 12 to 17 September 2011 Verification team: Mr C. Gitzinger (team leader) Mr E. Henrich Mr. E. Hrnecek Mr. A. Ryan Reference: IT-11/06 INTRODUCTION Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty requires that each Member State shall establish facilities necessary to carry out continuous monitoring of the levels of radioactivity in air, water and soil and to ensure compliance with the basic safety standards (1). Article 35 also gives the European Commission (EC) the right of access to such facilities in order that it may verify their operation and efficiency. For the EC, the Directorate-General for Energy (DG ENER) and in particular its Radiation Protection Unit (at the time of the visit ENER.D.4, now ENER.D.3) is responsible for undertaking these verifications. The main purpose of verifications performed under Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty is to provide an independent assessment of the adequacy of monitoring facilities for: - Liquid and airborne discharges of radioactivity into the environment by a site (and control thereof). - Levels of environmental radioactivity at the site perimeter and in the marine, terrestrial and aquatic environment around the site, for all relevant pathways. - Levels of environmental radioactivity on the territory of the Member State. Taking into account previous bilateral protocols, a Commission Communication has been published in the Official Journal on 4 July 2006 with a view to define some practical arrangements for the conduct of Article 35 verification visits in Member States.
  • 6Th South African Armoured Division

    6Th South African Armoured Division

    6TH SOUTH AFRICAN ARMOURED DIVISION By J.C. von Winterbach, Scott Sutherland, Mike Bersiks, Rex Barret and Barry Cooper. Beginning The idea of a South African Armoured Division was born out of the chaos of the Western Desert Campaign, the Of- ficers in the 1st and 2nd South African Infantry Divisions felt the need for their own armour instead of depending on other Commonwealth Armoured Units. The formation of two strong Armoured Divisions was first discussed between Lt. Gen. G. E. Brink and rimeP Minister (Field Marshal) J.C. Smuts in April 1941. At that point time, South Africa was struggling to maintain the manpo- wer needed to sustain the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions in the field due to the political divisions in the Country. The 3rd South African Infantry Division was based in South Africa and provided the pool from which reinforcements were drawn to supplement the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions. A re-organisation committee met for the first time in May 1942 to discuss the armour option, it was decided to send three Infantry Battalions for armour training in August 1942, but the plan was rudely interrupted when Rommel launched his attack on the Gazala line in late May 1942. Nine days after the final El Alamein offensive the South African Divisions were pulling back to regroup. The plan was for the 1st Infantry Division that was withdrawn to Quassasin and that its 1st Brigade would return to South Africa to regroup with the 7th Infantry Brigade in Madagascar to form the 1st South African Armoured Division and the 1st Infantry Divisions 2nd and 3rd Brigades would remain in Egypt to form the 6th South African Armoured Division, which would replace the 2nd Infantry Division that had been captured at Tobruk in June 1942.
  • Cry Havoc Règles Fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 Guiscarduiscard

    Cry Havoc Règles Fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 Guiscarduiscard

    maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 Guiscarduiscard HISTORY & SCENARIOS maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page2 © Buxeria & Historic’One éditions - 2014 - v1.1 maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 History Normans in Southern Italy and Sicily in the 11th Century 1 - The historical context 1.1 - Southern Italy and Sicily at the beginning of the 11th Century Byzantium had conquered Southern Italy and Sicily in the first half of the 6th century. But by the end of that century, Lombards coming from Northern Italy had conquered most of the peninsula, with Byzantium retaining only Calabria and Sicily. From the middle of the 9th century, the Aghlabid Dynasty of Ifrîquya (the original name of Eastern Maghreb) raided Sicily to take possession of the island. A new Byzantine offensive at the end of the century took back most of the lost territories in Apulia and Calabria and established Bari as the new provincial capital. Lombard territories further north were broken down between three cities led by princes: Capua, Salerno, and Benevento. Further east, Italian duchies of Naples, Amalfi, and Gaeta tried to keep their autonomy through successive alliances with the various regional powers to try and maintain their commercial interests. Ethnic struggles in Sicily between Arabs and Berbers on the one side, and various dynasties on the other side, led to power fragmentation: The island is divided between four rival military factions at the beginning of the 11th century. Beyond its natural boundaries, Southern Italy had to cope with two external powers which were looking to expel Byzantium from what they considered was part of their area of influence: the Papacy and the Holy Roman Empire.
  • 'Truth': Representations of Intercultural 'Translations'

    'Truth': Representations of Intercultural 'Translations'

    eScholarship California Italian Studies Title Sleights of Hand: Black Skin and Curzio Malaparte's La pelle Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xr9d2gm Journal California Italian Studies, 3(1) Author Escolar, Marisa Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/C331012084 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Sleights of Hand: Black Fingers and Curzio Malaparte’s La pelle Marisa Escolar La pelle [1949], written towards the end of Curzio Malaparte’s rather colorful political career,1 has long been used as a litmus test for its author, helping critics confirm their belief in a range of divergent and often contradictory interpretations. At one end of the spectrum is the view that he was an unscrupulous “chameleon” who distorted the reality of the Allies’ Liberation of Italy to suit his own interests.2 At the other is the claim that he was a true artist whose representations of the horrors of war absorb historical details into what is a consummately literary work.3 In other words, La pelle has been read either as a vulgar deformation or a poetic transcendence of the historical moment it purports to represent.4 And yet Malaparte’s narrative of the myriad social transformations following the Armistice actually combines concrete historical events (the Allies’ arrival in Naples and in Rome, the eruption of Vesuvius on March 22, 1944, and the battle of 1 Malaparte, born Kurt Erich Suckert, joined the Partito Nazionale Fascista in September 1922 and resigned in January, 1931 just before moving to France. Upon his return to Italy in October 1931, he was expelled from the party (despite having already left it) and sentenced to political exile on Lipari for five years of which he served less than two (Martellini Opere scelte xcii-xciv).
  • M1:Litlqry Law Review

    M1:Litlqry Law Review

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET 27-1 00-22 M1:LITLQRY LAW REVIEW GOVER?;\IEST C.41 SED IIEL.4TS I\ THE PERFORhIANCE OF FEDERXI, COSTRICT.5 THE I>IPr\CT OF THE COSTRACT CLAL‘S E 5 Ifajor Robert B. Clarke PL-BLIC POLICt- .4TD PHIV.ITE PEACE-THE FINALITY OF .4 JLDICI 4L DETER>IIS.ITION Caprain .li’attheu B. O’Donnell, Jr. THE DEVIL‘S ARTICLE Wing Commander D. R. .i’zchols IIILTT>iRY LA%- 13 SP.4IN Brigadier General Eduardo De IVO Louis THE IAK OF THE SF-4: A P.4RALLEL FOR SPACE LAW Captain lack H. Pilltanas FIVE -YE A R C KvIL LXT I V E IN DES PREFACE The Military Law Review is designed to provide a medium for those interested in the field of military law to share the product of their experience and research with their fellow lawyers. Articles should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to those articles having lasting value as reference material for the military lawyer. The Militury Law Review does not purport to promulgate De- partment of the Army policy or to be in any sense directory. The opinions reflected in each article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Judge Advocate General or the Department of the Army. Articles, comments, and notes should be submitted in duplicate, triple spaced, to the Editor, Military Law Review, The Judge Ad- vocate General’s School, U. s. Army, Charlottesville, Virginia. Footnotes should be triple spaced, set out on pages separate from the text and follow the manner of citation in the Harvurd Blue Book.
  • Catholic Poles in the USSR During the Second World War*

    Catholic Poles in the USSR During the Second World War*

    Religion, State and Society, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1994 Catholic Poles in the USSR during the Second World War* J6ZEFGULA The first of September 1939 was a tragic day in the history of Poland: the German army invaded the country from the west. Within a short time, on 17 September, a second invasion took place: in close cooperation with the Germans, the Soviet army invaded from the east, and some 1,500,000 Poles were subsequently deported to prisons, concentration camps and exile in the Soviet Union. In the Soviet Union, all forms of religious life were systematically suppressed. Those who openly professed their religious faith qualified for prison and death. Thus the Poles, the vast majority of whom were religious believers, were an endangered species in Russia. Ironically, it was the Germap. invasion of Russia in June 1941 which helped to relax for a year the deadly yoke of this oppression. At the time of this invasion, over 100,000 of the exiled Poles enjoyed, one may say, a degree of religious freedom. Their camps became oases of religious life unique in the country; and they are the subject of this article. Introduction: the Historical Context The written history of Poland from the tenth century onwards shows a strong link between church and state. The adoption of Christianity from Rome is seen now not only as a result of the zealous work of missionaries but also as a calculated political decision by the reigning prince. By accepting the influence of Rome, the Polish Kingdom was 'westernised' and under the leadership of the Piast family incorporated into a Christian Europe.
  • Kiwi Unit Manual 2012

    Kiwi Unit Manual 2012

    RE-ENACTMENT MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY TRAINING 2nd N.Z.E.F. 1939-1945 N.Z. SECTION W.W.2 Historical Re-enactment Society 2O12 1 CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION 3. STANDING ORDERS 4. TRAINING SCHEDULE 6. STANDING ORDERS OF DRESS AND ARMS 7. UNIFORM AND INSIGNIA 8. SECTION UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS 9. SERVICE DRESS AND KHAKI DRILL 10. BATTLE DRESS UNIFORM 11. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 12. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 13. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES 14. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES (PACIFIC) 15. QUARTERMASTERS STORES 16. INSIGNIA 17. RANK 18. COLOUR INSIGNIA 19. FREYBURG AND THE DIVISION 20. COMMAND ORGANISATION 21. BRIGADE LAYOUT 22. COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO BY CLIFF TUCKEY/ KEVIN CARBERRY 23. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 24. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 25. SMALL UNIT TACTICS 26. BATTLE TECHNIQUES 27. CASUALTY EVACUATION 28. CASUALTY EVACUATION 29. MILITARY PROTOCOL 30. FOOT DRILL 31. ARMS DRILL 32. ARMS DRILL (BAYONETS) 33. S.M.L.E. RIFLE 34. BREN GUN, THOMPSON SMG, VICKERS 35. BAYONET, REVOLVERS, STEN GUN, BROWNING MMG 36. ORDANANCE AND SUPPORT WEAPONS 37. ARTILLERY 38. VEHICLES 39. BREN CARRIERS 40. 37 PAT WEBBING 41. 37 PAT WEBBING 42. EXTRA KIT 43. RATIONS AND SMALL PACK 44. NEW ZEALANDS WAR EFFORT- CHARTS AND TABLES 45. GETTING IT RIGHT –SOME COMMON CONFUSIONS 46. CARING FOR KIT 47. GLOSSARY 48. GLOSSARY 49. BIBLOGRAPHY 50. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 2 WORLD WAR II HISTORICAL RE-ENACTMENT SOCIETY NEW ZEALAND TRAINING & REFERENCE MANUAL AN INTRODUCTION. At first glance the New Zealand soldier in the Second World War resembled any Commonwealth soldier. From a distance of 20 yards they looked no different from Australian, Canadian, or British troops unless they happened to be wearing their 'lemon squeezers'.
  • Alex Kershaw

    Alex Kershaw

    The 75th Anniversary of the WWII Italian Campaign • 1943 - 2018 The Liberator Malta, Sicily & Italy Aboard the Legendary Sea Cloud II OCTOBER 19 – 28, 2018 Extend your journey with our three-night post-tour in Rome & Florence Book early and save up to $2,000 per couple See page 43 for details. FEATURING AUTHOR & HISTORIAN ALEX KERSHAW Follow in the footsteps of US Army officer Felix Sparks, subject of Alex Kershaw’s best-selling book The Liberator, while seeing the best of Italy and visiting all of the key sites in the Italian campaign with the world's foremost experts in WWII history. Dear friend of the Museum and fellow traveler, t is my great delight to invite you to travel with me and my esteemed colleagues from The National WWII Museum on an epic voyage of liberation and wonder – Ifrom the ancient harbor of Valetta, Malta, to the shores of Italy, and all the way to the gates of Rome. I have written about many extraordinary warriors but none who gave more than Felix Sparks of the 45th “Thunderbird” Infantry Division. He experienced the full horrors of the key battles in Italy–a land of “mountains, mules, and mud,” but also of unforgettable beauty. Sparks fought from the very first day that Americans landed in Europe on July 10, 1943, to the end of the war. He earned promotions first as commander of an infantry company and then an entire battalion through Italy, France, and Germany, to the hell of Dachau. His was a truly awesome odyssey: from the beaches of Sicily to the ancient ruins at Paestum near Salerno; along the jagged, mountainous spine of Italy to the Liri Valley, overlooked by the Abbey of Monte Cassino; to the caves of Anzio where he lost his entire company in what his German foes believed was the most savage combat of the war–worse even than Stalingrad.
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55

    Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55

    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
  • 2Nd INFANTRY REGIMENT

    2Nd INFANTRY REGIMENT

    2nd INFANTRY REGIMENT 1110 pages (approximate) Boxes 1243-1244 The 2nd Infantry Regiment was a component part of the 5th Infantry Division. This Division was activated in 1939 but did not enter combat until it landed on Utah Beach, Normandy, three days after D-Day. For the remainder of the war in Europe the Division participated in numerous operations and engagements of the Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace and Central Europe campaigns. The records of the 2nd Infantry Regiment consist mostly of after action reports and journals which provide detailed accounts of the operations of the Regiment from July 1944 to May 1945. The records also contain correspondence on the early history of the Regiment prior to World War II and to its training activities in the United States prior to entering combat. Of particular importance is a file on the work of the Regiment while serving on occupation duty in Iceland in 1942. CONTAINER LIST Box No. Folder Title 1243 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories January 1943-June 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories, July-October 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Histories, July 1944- December 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, July-September 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, October-December 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, January-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Casualty List, 1944-1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Journal, 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Narrative History, October 1944-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment History Correspondence, 1934-1936 2nd Infantry
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial

    BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial

    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
  • Działania 1. Dywizji Pancernej Generała Maczka

    Działania 1. Dywizji Pancernej Generała Maczka

    Krzysztof Bąkała Smaki zwycięstwa – działania 1. Dywizji Pancernej generała Maczka Niepodległość i Pamięć 23/2 (54), 201-222 2016 ARTYKUŁY NIEPODLEGŁOŚĆ I PAMIĘĆ 2016, nr 2 (54) Krzysztof Bąkała Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie Smaki zwycięstwa – działania 1. Dywizji Pancernej generała Maczka Słowa kluczowe 1. Dywizja Pancerna, ,,Czarne Diabły”, Stanisław Maczek, Klemens Rud- nicki, Mont Ormel, ,,Maczuga”, Chambois, Falaise, Breda, Stalag VI C w Oberlangen, Wilhelmshaven, Haren n. rzeką Ems, Maczków, Emsland, 1. Samodzielna Brygada Spadochronowa. Streszczenie Artykuł omawia kilka wydarzeń z dziejów zwycięskiego szlaku bojowego 1. Dywi- zji Pancernej, nazwanej od nazwiska dowódcy dywizją generała Maczka. Poprzez nie, autor stara się zwrócić uwagę na emocje żołnierzy i ich zróżnicowanie, w zależ- ności od wymiaru osiąganych zwycięstw. Przypomina mordercze walki o wzgórza Mont Ormel, dalej wyzwolenie mieszkańców Bredy z jednoczesną, rzadko w bojo- wych warunkach stosowaną, troską o zachowanie bezcennych zabytków architek- tonicznych miasta, następnie uwolnienie 1728 kobiet, żołnierzy AK – uczestniczek powstania warszawskiego, z jenieckiego obozu Stalag VI C w Oberlangen, wresz- cie kapitulację wojsk hitlerowskich w udekorowanym biało-czerwonymi flagami Wilhelmshafen, będącym dumą niemieckiej marynarki. Po trudnym, ponaddwulet- nim zarządzaniu polską strefą okupacyjną w niemieckiej Fryzji i księstwie Olden- burgskim – tzw. ,,Emslandzie” została ujawniona informacja o jałtańskiej zdradzie, z czym wiązało się cofnięcie uznania dla Rządu Polskiego na Wychodźstwie. Arty- kuł kończy refleksja przyrównująca te emocje do innych, znanych z wcześniejszych kart historii Polski. 201 Krzysztof Bąkała Koniec II wojny światowej zastał poszczególne formacje bojowe sprzymierzonych w różnych rejonach Europy. Przez szereg lat w prze- strzeni symbolicznej, dotyczącej kontekstu finału polskiego czynu zbrojnego w II wojnie światowej, utrwaliła się Brama Brandenburska i stojący w jej pobliżu czołg T-34/85.