Greek Tragedy Rules II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greek Tragedy Rules II a GMT GAMEPLAYERS Series Game ? GREEK TRAGEDY ATATURK: The Greco-Turkish War, 1919-1922 UNARMED GOLIATH: The Italian Invasion of Greece, 1940-1941 Number of Players: Complexity: Moderate (4 out of 9) Learning Time: 30 minutes Playing Time: 3-8 hours Solitaire: High (7 of 9) a RICHARD H. BERG Game Design BNA Rules 1 ©Richard Berg, 1995 (1.0) INTRODUCTION A Greek Tragedy covers Greece’s two major wars after WWI: her attempt to seize the Ionian/western portion of Turkey, 1919-22 - the Ataturk game - and the woefully sorry invasion of Greece by Italy during WW II, Unarmed Goliath. In the Gameplayers series, the emphasis is on accessibility and playability, with as much historical flavor as we can muster. Given a choice between playability and historicity, we have tended to “err” on the side of the former. Each campaign has some of its own, specific rules; these are given in that campaign’s Scenario Book. Unless stated otherwise, the rules in this book apply top both campaigns. (2.0) COMPONENTS The game includes the following items: 2 22”x34” game maps ? sheet of combat counters (large) 1 sheet of informational markers (small) 1 Rules Book 2 Scenario Booklets 2 Charts & Tables Cards 1 ten-sided die (2.1) THE MAPS The gamemaps are overlayed with a grid of hexagons - hexes - which are used to regulate movement. The various types of terrain represented are discussed in the rules, below. The map of Greece is used for the Unarmed Goliath scenario; the map of Turkey for Ataturk. The two maps do link up; not that we provide any reason to do so. (2.2) THE COUNTERS The large, 5/8” Combat counters represent the mostly foot infantry units, with very few armored or motorized units. There are also smaller, 1/2” Support Units - Artillery and Air - and informational “markers” which are used to help keep the players on top of things. Most Combat units are printed on both sides; the reverse shows the unit in a “Reduced” state. Some units (usually with a combat strength of ‘1’) have no reverse side. The individual scenarios contain a larger list of units and their descriptions. Full Strength (Greek) Infantry Formation 5 [Unit ID: 5th Division] [Activation Indicator and Parent, xx [Unit Size: Division] the “B” Corps ] B X [Unit Type: Infantry] [Combat Strength Points] 5 7 8 [Movement Allowance] Cohesion BNA Rules 2 ©Richard Berg, 1995 Reduced Strength Formation 5 [Activation Indicator and Parent xx the “B” Corps ] B X Red [Unit Type: Infantry reduced] [Reduced Combat Strength Points] 3 6 8 [Movement Allowance] Reduced Cohesion The Activation Markers (5.1) indicate the Command to be activated. XXV Corps AM (2.3) THE DIE The game uses a ten-sided die. A ‘0’ is a “zero”, not a “ten”. (2.4) DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Awareness of the following terms will help as you read through the rules: AM = Abbreviation for Activation Marker, discussed in 5.1. Each Command has at least two AM. In this game, most AM are Corps level. Armor Points: Used as a Dieroll Modifier in Combat. There is very little (effective) armor in this game, and we have kept the use of Armor as simple as possible. CDR = Cohesion Dieroll, used to check whether a unit has “survived” Combat, or reacted adversely. Cohesion = A unit’s ability to withstand the rigors of combat, stated numerically. Combat Strength = A unit’s ability to engage in combat, rated numerically. Command = A group of combat units activated by play of an AM, and assigned to a specific Corps. DR = Alphabet soup for dieroll. A DRM is a dieroll modifier. Fully Activated = a unit that is capable of using all its abilities to the fullest. Units that have Limited Activation - usually those unable to trave an LOC - are restricted in what they can do. LOC = Line of Communication, a path of hexes that, when traced, enables a unit to be Fully Activated. Motorized = Units that move by wheel or track, as opposed to those on Foot. Most units in these games are Foot. PC = Port Capacity, the ability of ports to have resources - manpower and RP - flow through them. RP = Resource Points, the game’s currency. The equivalent of supply, command efficiency, planning, organizational structure, et al. BNA Rules 3 ©Richard Berg, 1995 ZOC = Zone of Control, or the ability of a unit to extend its presence into adjacent hexes. (2.5) THE SCALE The map scale is approximately 7.5 miles per hex. Each turn covers one month of real time. Units range from battalions all the way up to divisions. Very, very loosely, each Strength Point is the equivalent of 1500 men. Each Air unit represents about 20 planes. Artillery units, many of which are generic, are used to represent far more than just the number of guns involved. See the Artillery rules for more information. (2.6) QUESTIONS? xxxxxxx (3.0) SEQUENCE OF PLAY Each game-turn follows a set sequence. Within that sequence when individual units move is somewhat random, depending on when, or whether, their Activation Marker is drawn. A. Initiative Determination Phase. 1. Roll die to see who goes first. (4.0) 2. Check Weather B. Resource Allocation Phase. Players determine how many of their Available Resource Points they wish to use this turn. 1. Determine number of RP available for that turn (9.12) 2. Roll for Available Air Suport in Rain/Snow Weather 3. Place Arriving Reinforcements in Appropriate Box or Hex. (6.5) 4. Italian Corps Assignment (“Unarmed Goliath” only; 5.4) C. Marker Selection Phase. 1. Initiative Player chooses which Command (AM) will start the turn 2. Place all remaining Activation (and Random Event) Markers in The Pool D. Activation Phase (Applies only to units whose AMs are in Pool) 1. Draw Activation Marker from Pool. (Exception: C/2) 2. Activate Units for that AM by spending Resource Points (9.13) 3. Operations Sequence (to be fllowed strictly): a. Units Move b. Units engage in Combat c. Units that did neither ‘a’ nor ‘b’ may engage in Construction d. Refit (for units that did none of the above) (8.6) “D” is repeated until there are no AM left in the Pool. When that happens, go to: E. Isolation Phase. 1. Apply effects of Isolation 2. Determine changes in Isolation Status F. End Turn Phase. 1. Remove Air Interdiction markers 2. Proceed to next turn and top of Sequence, unless it was the last turn, in which case, determine Who Won. BNA Rules 4 ©Richard Berg, 1995 (4.0) THE INITIATIVE PHASE (4.1) DETERMINING INITIATIVE In the Initiative Determination Phase, each player rolls the die. High total has the Initiative for that turn. If there is a tie, No player has the Initiative, and all AMs go into The Pool. Play Note: Some scenarios either designater which player automatically has the Initiative, or gives one player a DRM for Initiative determination. The Player with the Initiative may (not must) pre-select (choose specifically) with which AM - and command - he wants to start that turn. (4.2) WEATHER Weather affects the Movement capabilities of units, as well as the ability of air support to function. (4.21) At the start of each game-turn the players determine the weather for the start of that turn by rolling the die, consulting the Weather Table for that scenario, cross-referencing that DR with the turn/month, and determining what the Weather is. (4.22) During the course of the turn, the Weather may change. See the indiviual scenario rules for how this occurs, as well as for the scenario-specific effects of weather. (4.23) Rain and Snow Weather provide negative DRM for any combat. (5.0) ACTIVATION (5.1) ACTIVATION MARKERS (AMs) Activation markers are used to determine which player may “go”, and what units he may then use in the Activation Phase. All Commands have two AM. Each Activation Marker (AM) represents a Command - usually a Corps, and all the units in that Corps - as indicated on the side of each combat counter, and also by specific colors. AM activate the units assigned to that corps, allowing them to undertake operations. (5.2) THE ACTIVATION PHASE (5.21) Combat units are assigned to a specific Corps. How corps are represented is covered in each scenario, and is often different for each side. All AMs are available if any units for that corps are either on the map (including the various boxes) or scheduled to enter as a reinforcement. (5.22) All available AM are placed in the AM Activation Pool - an opaque cup (or similar container) - for random selection during the Activation Phase. Exception: 4.1. (5.23) In the D/1 segment of the Activation Phase one of the players - it matters not which - draws, randomly and blindly, one AM from The Pool. That AM designates which Corps may activate its units, as well as any independent units under that AM. (5.24) Full Capacity Activation. When a Corps is activated by an AM, the units of that command that can trace a Line of Communications (LOC, as defined in the individual scenarios), at the instant of activation, which allows them to receive Resource Points (supply) may operate at Full Capacity: BNA Rules 5 ©Richard Berg, 1995 •• Move up to their printed Movement Allowance. •• Attack •• Undergo Construction, if they neither moved nor attacked •• Refit (for units that did none of the above) (5.25) Limited Activation. Units of an activated command that have not received Resource Points (see 9.2), operate under the following restrictions: 1.
Recommended publications
  • Evzones: the Historic Presidential Guard of Greece
    30 FRIDAY 15 JANUARY 2010 NEWS IN ENGLISH Ï Êüóìïò Evzones: The historic Presidential Guard of Greece The Evzones (Presidential In 1926 a panhellenic Guard) have a history that competition was an- nounced for a design stretches over more than a centu- for a Tomb of the Un- ry. The Presidential Guard was known Soldier. It was to founded on 12 December 1868 be built in front of the as a combatant and at the same main entrance of the Parliament building, time ceremonial force. Gradually facing Syntagma (Con- its role became solely ceremonial, stitution) Square. as can be seen by its changing names: the Palace Guard, the On 9 October 1926 the Ministry for the Flag Guard, the Guard of the Military with ordinance Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, number 219188 award- the Royal Guard and finally, ed the prize to the ar- since 1974 and the restoration of chitect Emmanuel Lazaridis. However the decision to erect democracy in Greece, the the tomb in the afore-mentioned place Presidential Guard. was delayed as it met with many objec- tions and differing opinions. A new com- he barracks where the Presiden- mittee was formed in June of 1928 and tial Guard is based has been in the Cabinet accepted its proposals. In Tthe same place since the force April 1929 work began and the monu- was founded. It is situated close to the ment was completed on March of 1932. present Presidential Man- Its inauguration took place at the time of sion (formerly the Palace) the National Holiday of the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th South African Armoured Division
    6TH SOUTH AFRICAN ARMOURED DIVISION By J.C. von Winterbach, Scott Sutherland, Mike Bersiks, Rex Barret and Barry Cooper. Beginning The idea of a South African Armoured Division was born out of the chaos of the Western Desert Campaign, the Of- ficers in the 1st and 2nd South African Infantry Divisions felt the need for their own armour instead of depending on other Commonwealth Armoured Units. The formation of two strong Armoured Divisions was first discussed between Lt. Gen. G. E. Brink and rimeP Minister (Field Marshal) J.C. Smuts in April 1941. At that point time, South Africa was struggling to maintain the manpo- wer needed to sustain the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions in the field due to the political divisions in the Country. The 3rd South African Infantry Division was based in South Africa and provided the pool from which reinforcements were drawn to supplement the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions. A re-organisation committee met for the first time in May 1942 to discuss the armour option, it was decided to send three Infantry Battalions for armour training in August 1942, but the plan was rudely interrupted when Rommel launched his attack on the Gazala line in late May 1942. Nine days after the final El Alamein offensive the South African Divisions were pulling back to regroup. The plan was for the 1st Infantry Division that was withdrawn to Quassasin and that its 1st Brigade would return to South Africa to regroup with the 7th Infantry Brigade in Madagascar to form the 1st South African Armoured Division and the 1st Infantry Divisions 2nd and 3rd Brigades would remain in Egypt to form the 6th South African Armoured Division, which would replace the 2nd Infantry Division that had been captured at Tobruk in June 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi Unit Manual 2012
    RE-ENACTMENT MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY TRAINING 2nd N.Z.E.F. 1939-1945 N.Z. SECTION W.W.2 Historical Re-enactment Society 2O12 1 CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION 3. STANDING ORDERS 4. TRAINING SCHEDULE 6. STANDING ORDERS OF DRESS AND ARMS 7. UNIFORM AND INSIGNIA 8. SECTION UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS 9. SERVICE DRESS AND KHAKI DRILL 10. BATTLE DRESS UNIFORM 11. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 12. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 13. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES 14. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES (PACIFIC) 15. QUARTERMASTERS STORES 16. INSIGNIA 17. RANK 18. COLOUR INSIGNIA 19. FREYBURG AND THE DIVISION 20. COMMAND ORGANISATION 21. BRIGADE LAYOUT 22. COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO BY CLIFF TUCKEY/ KEVIN CARBERRY 23. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 24. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 25. SMALL UNIT TACTICS 26. BATTLE TECHNIQUES 27. CASUALTY EVACUATION 28. CASUALTY EVACUATION 29. MILITARY PROTOCOL 30. FOOT DRILL 31. ARMS DRILL 32. ARMS DRILL (BAYONETS) 33. S.M.L.E. RIFLE 34. BREN GUN, THOMPSON SMG, VICKERS 35. BAYONET, REVOLVERS, STEN GUN, BROWNING MMG 36. ORDANANCE AND SUPPORT WEAPONS 37. ARTILLERY 38. VEHICLES 39. BREN CARRIERS 40. 37 PAT WEBBING 41. 37 PAT WEBBING 42. EXTRA KIT 43. RATIONS AND SMALL PACK 44. NEW ZEALANDS WAR EFFORT- CHARTS AND TABLES 45. GETTING IT RIGHT –SOME COMMON CONFUSIONS 46. CARING FOR KIT 47. GLOSSARY 48. GLOSSARY 49. BIBLOGRAPHY 50. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 2 WORLD WAR II HISTORICAL RE-ENACTMENT SOCIETY NEW ZEALAND TRAINING & REFERENCE MANUAL AN INTRODUCTION. At first glance the New Zealand soldier in the Second World War resembled any Commonwealth soldier. From a distance of 20 yards they looked no different from Australian, Canadian, or British troops unless they happened to be wearing their 'lemon squeezers'.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Entrepreneurship in the Shadow of the Greek Civil War (1946–1949)
    JPR Men of the Gun and Men of the State: Military Entrepreneurship in the Shadow of the Greek Civil War (1946–1949) Spyros Tsoutsoumpis Abstract: The article explores the intersection between paramilitarism, organized crime, and nation-building during the Greek Civil War. Nation-building has been described in terms of a centralized state extending its writ through a process of modernisation of institutions and monopolisation of violence. Accordingly, the presence and contribution of private actors has been a sign of and a contributive factor to state-weakness. This article demonstrates a more nuanced image wherein nation-building was characterised by pervasive accommodations between, and interlacing of, state and non-state violence. This approach problematises divisions between legal (state-sanctioned) and illegal (private) violence in the making of the modern nation state and sheds new light into the complex way in which the ‘men of the gun’ interacted with the ‘men of the state’ in this process, and how these alliances impacted the nation-building process at the local and national levels. Keywords: Greece, Civil War, Paramilitaries, Organized Crime, Nation-Building Introduction n March 1945, Theodoros Sarantis, the head of the army’s intelligence bureau (A2) in north-western Greece had a clandestine meeting with Zois Padazis, a brigand-chief who operated in this area. Sarantis asked Padazis’s help in ‘cleansing’ the border area from I‘unwanted’ elements: leftists, trade-unionists, and local Muslims. In exchange he promised to provide him with political cover for his illegal activities.1 This relationship that extended well into the 1950s was often contentious.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Barnes' Greek Archive, 1942–45
    Archived at the Flinders Academic Commons: http://dspace.flinders.edu.au/dspace/ This is the published version of the following article: Barnes, K 2019, 'Gorgopotamos and after: Tom Barnes' Greek archive 1942-45', Journal of Modern Greek Studies (Australia and New Zealand) — Special Issue, pp. 163-185. Reproduced with permission of the publisher. © 2019 the author. Gorgopotamos and After: Tom Barnes’ Gree Are, 42–45 Katherine Barnes Cecil dward (Tom) arnes took part in the famous sabotage operation of the Gorgopotamos Bridge in November 1942 as leader of the demolition party. Remaining in Greece after the attack, he rose to become one of two Area Commanders for the Allied Military Mission in Greece. The archive he left behind at his death in 1952 includes over 1000 photos, war diaries, letters and reports, mainly relating to his experiences in Greece. This study demonstrates how these eye-witness records illuminate important aspects of these critical years in modern Greek history including the Gorgopotamos operation itself and the trek across Greece which followed, the “Animals” operation which was conducted to convince Hitler that the Allied landings would take place in Greece and distract his attention from Sicily, surrender overtures from the German commander in pirus General Hubert von Lanz), and the so-called first two rounds of Civil War in 1943 and 1944. ntrodton When Captain later Lieutenant-Colonel) “Tom” arnes was parachuted into Greece in late 194 at the age of 35 as one of three engineers for a Special Operations xecutive (SO mission against the German and Italian occupying forces, he had with him several small notebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69 IX – BOEOTIA – A COLONY OF THE MINI AND THE FLEGI .....71 X – COLONIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 New Zealand Division (1943 Tunisia)]
    7 September 2020 [2 NEW ZEALAND DIVISION (1943 TUNISIA)] nd 2 New Zealand Infantry Division (1) Headquarters, 2nd New Zealand Infantry Division 2nd New Zealand Divisional Defence Platoon 2nd New Zealand Divisional Intelligence Section 2nd New Zealand Divisional Field Security Section 4th New Zealand Armoured Brigade (2) Headquarters, 4th New Zealand Armoured Brigade (4 Squadron, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Signals) 18th New Zealand Armoured Regiment (38th Light Aid Detachment) 19th New Zealand Armoured Regiment (39th Light Aid Detachment) 20th New Zealand Armoured Regiment (40th Light Aid Detachment) 22nd New Zealand Motor Battalion (3) New Zealand Divisional Forward Delivery Squadron 4th Armoured Brigade Band 5th New Zealand Infantry Brigade Headquarters, 5th New Zealand Armoured Brigade (‘K’ Section, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Signals) 21st New Zealand Infantry Battalion 23rd New Zealand Infantry Battalion 28th New Zealand (Maori) Infantry Battalion 5th Infantry Brigade Band © w w w . B r i t i s h M i l i t a r y H istory.co.uk Page 1 7 September 2020 [2 NEW ZEALAND DIVISION (1943 TUNISIA)] 6th New Zealand Infantry Brigade Headquarters, 6th New Zealand Infantry Brigade (‘L’ Section, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Signals) 24th New Zealand Infantry Battalion 25th New Zealand Infantry Battalion 26th New Zealand Infantry Battalion 6th Infantry Brigade Band Divisional Troops New Zealand Divisional Cavalry Regiment (4) (‘C’ Section, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Signals & 13th Light Aid Detachment) 27th New Zealand Machine Gun Battalion (5) Headquarters, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Artillery 4th Field Regiment, New Zealand Artillery (H.Q. 25th, 26th & 46th Field Batteries, New Zealand Artillery, ‘E’ Section, 2nd New Zealand Divisional Signals & 9th Light Aid Detachment) 5th Field Regiment, New Zealand Artillery (H.Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Greek Security Battalions, 1943-1944
    VOL. XV, Nos. 1 & 2 SPRING-SUMMER 1988 Publisher: LEANDROS PAPATHANASIOU Editorial Board: MARIOS L. EVRIVIADES ALEXANDROS KITROEFF PETER PAPPAS YIANNIS P. ROUBATIS Managing Eidtor: SUSAN ANASTASAKOS Advisory Board: MARGARET ALEXIOU KOSTIS MOSKOFF Harvard University Thessaloniki, Greece SPYROS I. ASDRACHAS Nlcos MOUZELIS University of Paris I London School of Economics LOUKAS AXELOS JAMES PETRAS Athens, Greece S.U.N.Y. at Binghamton HAGEN FLEISCHER OLE L. SMITH University of Crete University of Copenhagen ANGELIKI E. LAIOU STAVROS B. THOMADAKIS Harvard University Baruch College, C.U.N.Y. CONSTANTINE TSOUCALAS University of Athens The Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora is a quarterly review published by Pella Publishing Company, Inc., 337 West 36th Street, New York, NY 10018-6401, U.S.A., in March, June, September, and December. Copyright © 1988 by Pella Publishing Company. ISSN 0364-2976 NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS DAVID GILMORE is professor of anthropology at the State Uni- versity of New York at Stony Brook . MOLLY GREENE is a doc- toral candidate at Princeton University . CLIFFORD P. HACKETT is a former aide to U.S. Representative Benjamin Rosenthal and Senator Paul Sarbanes. He is currently administering an exchange program between the U.S. Congress and the European Parliament and is also executive director of the American Council for Jean Monnet Studies . JOHN LOUIS HONDROS is professor of history at the College of Wooster, Ohio ... ADAMANTIA POLLIS is professor of political science at the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Re- search . JOHN E. REXINE is Charles A. Dana Professor of the Classics and director of the division of the humanities at Colgate Uni- versity .
    [Show full text]
  • Notices 1 up to 14 / 2018
    ANNUAL NOTICES TO MARINERS VALID FROM 1ST JANUARY 2018 Notices 1up to 14 HELLENIC NAVY HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE 1 Responsibility for the publication of this issue is undertaken by the Safety of Navigation Division, Hellenic Navy Hydrographic Service. Annual notices to mariners provide important information, of permanent nature, about the Hellenic seas and the main routes of navigation in the Mediterranean Sea. The edition is annual due to the importance of the information it contains. Changes, corrections and inputs that have been done on the text of the Annual Notices to Mariners are marked with a black perpendicular line on the left margin of every page. Mariners are requested to report to Hellenic Navy Hydrographic Service upon discovering any navigational hazard or ascertain differences between the real situation and the elements provided on the nautical charts and publications. Contact details are as follows: Hellenic Navy Hydrographic Service, Post: Safety of Navigation Division, TGN 1040 ATHENS Phone: (+30) 210 65 51 772 (+30) 210 65 51 770 (+30) 210 65 51 806 Fax: (+30) 210 65 57 139 (+30) 210 65 17 811 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] You can also report to the nearest Port Authority. In the event of unlit or malfunctioning lights (Lighthouses, lights, lightbuoys) mariners should report as soon as possible to the Hellenic Navy Lighthouse Service at: Post: Hellenic Navy Lighthouse Service, 185 10 Piraeus Phone: (+30) 210 45 81 508 Fax: (+30) 210 45 81 410 e-mail: [email protected] The monthly Notices to Mariners issue and its traces, the Navwarn catalogue in force and the international and national NAVTEX broadcasts are available on the website of HNHS: www.hnhs.gr 2 INDEX Notice Subject Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • (Māori) Battalion Became a Source of Great Pride to Many New Zealanders
    Fact Sheet 1: New Zealand and the Second World War The Second World War was the world’s most destructive conflict. It took the lives of up to 50 million people. The 12,000 New Zealanders who died during the war might not seem like a large number by comparison, but at the time our population was under 2 million. On a per capita basis, this country’s losses were the highest in the Commonwealth – approximately one out of every 150 New Zealanders died on war service. Most New Zealanders accepted that our security depended on the survival of Britain and the outcome of the war in Europe. As a result, the majority of the 140,000 New Zealanders who served overseas were involved in the Mediterranean region, in Greece, Crete, North Africa and Italy. New Zealand forces also fought against the Japanese in the Pacific and took part in the post- war occupation of Japan. In each case, New Zealanders served as part of a larger Allied force, alongside British, Australian, American or other troops. Approximately 104,000 served in 2NZEF (the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force). The rest served in New Zealand or British naval and air forces. Back home, a further 100,000 New Zealanders enlisted in the Home Guard. In all, 67% of men aged between 18 and 45 served in the armed forces. The mobilisation of New Zealanders for the war effort did not just involve military personnel. New Zealand devoted a very high proportion of its resources to the war effort and in particular to ensuring that Britain was fed.
    [Show full text]