DOCSLIB.ORG

Contract Documents For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contract Documents For Contract documents for A16 - Invitation to tender for regular bus services in Movia Trafikselskabet Movia Contracts July 2017 A16 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 6 Table of Contents 1. Contract Conditions ........................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Questions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Prequalification .............................................................................................................. 10 1.2.1 Prequalification application ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Grounds for exclusion ............................................................................................. 11 1.2.3 Suitability ................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.4 Selection.................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.5 Documentation for suitability and fulfilment of selection criteria ............................. 12 1.3 Submission of tenders ................................................................................................... 12 1.3.1 Negotiation phases ................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Tenderers ................................................................................................................ 13 1.3.3 Requirements and terms ......................................................................................... 13 1.3.4 Submission of tenders in general ............................................................................ 13 1.3.5 Combinatorics ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3.6 Options .................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.7 Content of the tender .............................................................................................. 15 1.3.8 Deadline for submission of tenders ......................................................................... 18 1.4 Evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 19 1.4.1 Sub-criteria .............................................................................................................. 19 1.4.2 Final evaluation ....................................................................................................... 30 1.5 Conclusion of the contract ............................................................................................. 31 1.6 Right of access to documents and publication .............................................................. 32 2. Scope of tender ................................................................................................................. 32 2.1 Material changes to current timetables ......................................................................... 34 2.2 Vehicle schedules for payment ..................................................................................... 34 2.2.1 Changes to vehicle schedules for payment ............................................................ 34 2.2.2 Timetable changes .................................................................................................. 35 2.2.3 Timetable boards .................................................................................................... 35 2.3 Timetable hours and stops ............................................................................................ 36 2.3.1 Calculation of timetable hours and extra time ......................................................... 36 2.3.2 Definition of stop ..................................................................................................... 36 2.3.3 Minimum stopping time at final destination ............................................................. 37 Trafikselskabet Movia July 2017 A16 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 6 2.4 Calculation of factors for adjustment of costs related to timetable hours ..................... 37 2.4.1 Changes in stopping time(CF1) .............................................................................. 37 2.4.2 Changed day-time and night-time distribution (CF2) .............................................. 38 2.4.3 Adjustment of costs related to timetable hours ....................................................... 39 2.4.4 Illustration of principles............................................................................................ 39 2.5 Empty running ............................................................................................................... 40 2.6 Changes in routes, additional and relief services and other matters ............................ 41 2.7 Tender units ................................................................................................................... 43 2.7.1 Tender unit 1. Runs 342 and 840 ........................................................................... 43 2.7.2 Tender unit 2. Vehicle schedule 116 ....................................................................... 47 2.7.3 Tender unit 3. Vehicle schedule 123 ....................................................................... 50 2.7.4 Tender unit 4. Vehicle schedule 215 ....................................................................... 52 2.7.5 Tender unit 5. Vehicle schedule 216 ....................................................................... 55 2.7.6 Tender unit 6. Vehicle schedule 217 ....................................................................... 57 2.7.7 Tender unit 7. Vehicle schedule 220 ....................................................................... 59 2.7.8 Tender unit 8. Vehicle schedule 246 ....................................................................... 61 2.7.9 Tender unit 9. Vehicle schedules 201A, 202A, 203, 206, 209 and 212 .................. 63 3. Bus equipment .................................................................................................................. 69 3.1 In general ....................................................................................................................... 69 3.2 Buses brought into service ............................................................................................ 69 3.3 Fitting out, safety, etc. ................................................................................................... 71 3.3.1 Regulatory requirements ......................................................................................... 71 3.3.2 Length ..................................................................................................................... 71 3.3.3 Bus type .................................................................................................................. 71 3.3.4 Doors ....................................................................................................................... 72 3.3.5 Entry and exit .......................................................................................................... 73 3.3.6 Seating and standing capacity ................................................................................ 74 3.3.7 Seats ....................................................................................................................... 74 3.3.8 Flexi area: Pram and wheelchair area .................................................................... 75 3.3.9 Gangway and floor areas ........................................................................................ 77 3.3.10 Hand rails and bus stop buttons ........................................................................... 77 3.3.11 Indoor climate and window panes ......................................................................... 78 3.3.12 Interior lighting ....................................................................................................... 80 Trafikselskabet Movia July 2017 A16 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 6 3.3.13 Video surveillance system..................................................................................... 80 3.3.14 Fitting out the driver's seating area ....................................................................... 80 3.3.15 Safety .................................................................................................................... 80 3.3.16 Other requirements ............................................................................................... 81 3.3.17 Destination and bus route signs ............................................................................ 82 3.3.18 Comfort measures ................................................................................................. 83 3.4 Upgrading of equipment, etc. ........................................................................................ 84 3.5 Cleaning ........................................................................................................................ 84 3.6 Design ........................................................................................................................... 85 3.6.1 Destination signs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fra Københavns Vestegn Otte Landsbyer
    Fra Københavns vestegn otte landsbyer Landskabet vest for København er præ- Oprindelig var egnen dækket af skov, men get af landbrug, store moseområder og allerede i oldtiden blev skoven ryddet for mange små vandløb. På bakkedragene at skabe plads for det landbrug, der i de 56 ligger en række velbevarede landsbyer, følgende årtusinder kom til at sætte sit der i dag stadig er omkranset af marker præg på egnen. Det var den gode jord, eller af nyere bebyggelse. I fl ere af lands- fede enge ved de mange ådale, mosernes byerne kan der endnu opleves en næsten tørv og fra middelalderen også nærheden ”Morten Korchsk” stemning med kirken og til det københavnske marked, der udvikle- gadekæret, der er omgivet af gamle gårde de Vestegnen til hovedstadens spisekam- og huse. mer og leverandør af tørv. Landskab plads til skov, der kunne give brænde. Et resultat Da isen for 15.000 år siden trak sig tilbage efter- af manglen på træ blev, at udnyttelsen af moser- lod den Københavns vestegn som et svagt kupe- nes tørv fi k stigende betydning. I dette svagt ku- ret landskab, der var så fl adt, at åerne ikke kunne perede landskab, gennemskåret af ådale og mose- lede alt vandet bort. Mange dale og lavninger områder fi ndes i dag velbevarede landsbyer omgi- blev oversvømmet af vand, og der opstod et sy- vet af en frugtbar lerjord, som stadig danner stem af lavvandede søer. På bunden af søerne op- grundlag for en betydelig landbrugsproduktion. hobede der sig et dyndlag, der efterhånden som planterne fi k rodfæste udviklede sig til moser Landsbyer med et betydeligt tørvelag.
    [Show full text]
  • Basisprojekt 3
    Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Basisprojekt 3 3. semester - E20 Eksamensgruppe nr. og HOLD: V2024809828 Projekttitel: Unge, bæredygtighed og offentligt transport i Storkøbenhavn Gruppens medlemmer: Axel Østergaard Penny 68922 Hamza Yalmaz Mahmood 68898 Matilde Kirkegaard Nielsen 69229 Mathias Jarlbæk Mathias mod 68838 Amir Mohamad Issa 68879 Martine Ulvedal Wrona 68850 Vejleder: Kim Sandholt Dato: 06/01-2021 Side 1 af 76 Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Abstract This project incorporates the dimensions “Subjectivity, Technology and Society”, “Design & Construction”, and “Scientific Theory”. The assignment is focused on the sustainable and environmentally friendly aspects of public transport systems. The report goes on to explore how green and sustainable public transport truly is, and how we can make people between the ages of 18 to 29 play a bigger part in slowing down the global CO₂ emissions by choosing public transportation. In this project we have conducted two interviews to gather knowledge on the danish youth, in terms of their use of public transportation. We have come to learn that the youth disregard the environmental benefits that public transport has to offer due to prioritizing convenience and simplicity. Therefore we designed an explainer video with the purpose of making public transport seem appealing for the youth, based on their opinions. Side 2 af 76 Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Indholdsfortegnelse Abstract 2 Indholdsfortegnelse 3 Indledning 5 Problemfelt 5 Problemformuleringen 6 Arbejdsspørgsmål 6 Offentlig transport i dagens Danmark 7 Afgrænsning 8 Semesterbindingen 9 Teori 9 Postfænomenologi og Fænomenologi 9 Kampagneteori 11 Målgruppe 11 Effekthierarki 13 Grundmodel vs.
    [Show full text]
  • ADDRESSING the METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE in BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix
    ADDRESSING THE METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE IN BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix. Case studies of five metropolitan areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich Case Studies of Five Metropolitan Areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich is part of the study Addressing Metropolitan Challenges in Barcelona Metropolitan Area, which was drafted by the Metropolitan Research Institute of Budapest for the Barcelona Metropolitan Area (AMB). The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone, and the AMB cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. © Àrea Metropolitana de Barcelona June 2018 Table of contents Amsterdam . 29 Copenhagen ....................................................... 36 Greater Manchester ................................................ 42 Stuttgart .......................................................... 52 Zürich ............................................................. 60 Addressing the Metropolitan Challenge in AMB. Case Studies AMSTERDAM (Netherlands) 1. National level framework 1.1. Formal government system The Netherlands is a constitutional monarchy with that is, only binding to the administrative unit which a representative parliamentary democracy and a has developed them (OECD 2017a:21). Aside from decentralised unitary state, characterised by a strong establishing the general legal framework and setting a political tradition of broad consensus seeking in policy strategic course, the state defined
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic and Mobility Plan for the Capital Region of Denmark a Better Framework for a Coherent Everyday Life
    Traffic and Mobility Plan for the Capital Region of Denmark A better framework for a coherent everyday life This Traffic and Mobility Plan focuses on enhancing mobility for all citizens and commuters travelling in the Capital Region of Denmark at times when congestion is worst and pressure on the region’s infrastructure is highest. The plan provides an overview and an understanding of the transport challenges in the capital region. Through analysis and debate with key players the plan identifies strategic development themes and initiatives to address increasing congestion and create a coherent transport system. The plan's initiatives will help create the conditions for a more streamlined experience of public transport by reducing time wasted in the transport system and by contributing to a green transition of public transport. 20% more trips in 2035 Due to significant population growth in the capital region the transport network should be able to handle 20% more trips in 2035 which puts pressure on the entire transport system. Forecasts predict that car drivers in the capital region will waste 33.4 million hours in 2035 due to congestion and it is not possible to resolve this solely by expanding the road network. A holistic approach The needs for mobility and options available vary over the region’s different geographical areas and given high commuting rates – both within and to and from surrounding regions – there must be more options available to ensure effective mobility across the entire region. This calls for a holistic and cross-cutting approach to traffic planning based on people’s individual travel needs and the possibility to choose and combine freely between different modes of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Conditions for the Danish Travelcard Rejsekort
    Terms and conditions for the Danish travelcard Rejsekort Version 6.5 UK Effective from 27 September 2016 1 CONTENTS Rejsekort terms and conditions ...................................................................................................... 4 1. About Rejsekort and Pendlerkort ...................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is a Rejsekort ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 What is a Pendlerkort...................................................................................................... 5 1.3 How to use a Rejsekort and a Pendler kort ......................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Rejsekort ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Pendlerkort .................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Card issuer ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Prices and fees ............................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Card types and validity .................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Customer Types .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Projektoversigt – Region Hovedstaden Indhold
    Projektoversigt – Region Hovedstaden Indhold Kollektiv transport ............................................................................................ 3 Anlæg af Øresundsperroner på Ny Ellebjerg Station ............................. 3 Anlæg af fjern- og regionaltogsperroner på Glostrup Station .............. 4 Udvidelse af Københavns Lufthavn Station ............................................ 5 Anlæg af vendespor ved Københavns Lufthavn Station ....................... 6 Anlæg af overhalingsspor til godstog ved Kalvebod .............................. 7 Flytning af Herlev Station .......................................................................... 8 Ombygning af Nordhavn Station .............................................................. 9 Anlæg af vendespor til S-tog ved Carlsberg Station ............................. 10 Metrodrift på S-banen ............................................................................... 11 Hastighedsopgraderinger på S-banen ..................................................... 12 Forenkling af Københavns Hovedbanegård ......................................... 13 Opgradering af Hillerød Station .............................................................. 14 Forskønnelse af Nørreport Station ......................................................... 15 VVM-undersøgelse og anlæg af metro til Lynetteholm og Nordøstamager .......................................................................................... 16 Analyse af metrodrift på Kystbanen ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forslag Til Kommuneplan 2017 for Furesø Kommune Hovedstruktur
    Forslag til kommuneplan 2017 for Furesø Kommune kan ses på kommunens hjemmeside www.furesoe.dk/kommuneplan 2017. Forslag til kommuneplan 2017 Furesø Kommune, juni 2017 for Furesø Kommune Hovedstruktur Furesø Kommune Stiager 2 3500 Værløse www.furesoe.dk Fotos: Alf Blume, Bodil Hammer, Dorthe Bendtsen, Jørgen Overgaard, Niels Plum, Mikkel Arnfred, Kim Ton- ning, Preben Bitsch, Signe Fiig, Søren Svendsen, Tenna Hansen, Thomas Halvor Jensen, Coloubox, Ideas4you, Furesø Kommune, Furesø Løbeklub, Furesø Museum, Naturpark Mølleåen og Vestforbrænding. Tryk: Cool Gray A/S Kom og vær med – sæt dit aftryk på Furesø Kommune I år er det 10 år siden, de to kommuner Farum og Værløse blev sammenlagt til Furesø Kommune. Vi vil være en attraktiv, grøn bosætningskommune, og vi har netop rundet de 42.000 indbyggere. En landsdækkende undersøgelse har i foråret 2017 vist, at Furesø er den kommune i landet, flest borgere vil anbefale andre at flytte til. Vi har altså grund til at forvente, at vi bliver flere i de kom- mende år. Nye borgere giver mulighed for at udvikle kommunen og dens tilbud. Men i Furesø vil vi ikke have vækst for vækstens skyld – vi vil have bæredygtig vækst i dialog med borgere og virksomheder. Bæredygtig vækst handler om at bevare og beskytte de kultur- og naturværdier, vi har, samtidig med at vi udvikler med omtanke. I Furesø har vi nogle af hovedstadsområdets flotteste natur- områder. Dem skal vi bevare og beskytte, så også kommende generationer kan få glæde af dem. Samtidig skal vi give mulighed for at benytte dem, så flere får adgang til naturen, samtidig med, at landbrug og fødevareerhverv kan drives og trives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M
    The influence of political structures and local community engagement on placemaking in train stations A case study of Glostrup Multifunctional Station Sustainable Cities Thesis Aalborg University of Copenhagen Mohammad Ghannam Study No. 2094407 Date: October 2th, 2019 Abstract Traditionally the development of a train station focuses on transportation manners for commuters. The challenge in modern train stations is the quality of the public space, which adds value to citizens through sustainable measures. It is crucial to strengthen participation for better development of train stations. There is a lack of involvement, and throughout the thesis, it is demonstrated that the argument is two- folded. The first one is local, about local development, inclusion, and achieving locally sustainable objectives. The other is about the system level. In order to handle the urbanization, new ways of governing are fundamental to achieve an optimal train station that comprehends all aspects of the transportation system. In a paradigm of transport where time-travel is at the center, there is not enough focus on the quality of the trip as a whole for people. The quality of the space is affected by the existing infrastructure that puts some limitations on the recreation of the place. Other challenging aspects of urban spaces, at the stations, are better transport modes, energy-efficiency, pollution reduction and policy framework. The focus on train stations is relevant for the development of sustainable cities since it offers quality of life, efficient connectivity, optimal and innovative use of public spaces and reduction of human footprint. The purpose of this thesis is to explore the influence of the political structure and the local community concerning strengthening placemaking in train stations.
    [Show full text]
  • DSB S-Tog A/S
    AFGØRELSE FRA ANKENÆVNET FOR BUS, TOG OG METRO Journalnummer: 2012-0102 Klageren: XX 5700 Svendborg Indklagede: DSB S-tog A/S Klagen vedrører: Refusion af taxaregning på 182 kr. grundet forsinkelse. Ankenævnets sammensætning: Nævnsformand, landsdommer Tine Vuust Ingrid Dissing (2 stemmer) Lise Bjørg Pedersen Torben Steenberg SAGSFREMSTILLING: Klageren reklameret til indklagede: 8. marts 2012. Klagegebyr modtaget i ankenævnet: 16. marts 2012. Sagens omstændigheder: Klageren skulle den 5. marts 2012 rejse fra Glostrup til Svendborg. Grundet hærværk blev klage- rens S-tog mellem Glostrup station og Høje Taastrup station aflyst, og det efterfølgende tog med planlagt ankomst 20 minutter efter, blev 10 minutter forsinket. Ifølge klageren var hun nødt til at tage en taxa fra Glostrup station til Høje Taastrup station for at nå sine videre forbindelser, herunder den sidste forbindelse fra Nyborg til Svendborg. Taxaturen blev påbegyndt klokken 20:58 og afsluttet klokken 21:09 og beløb sig til 182 kr., som klageren den 8. marts 2012 søgte refunderet hos DSB S-tog. DSB S-tog afviste den 9. marts 2012 klagerens krav. DSB S-tog henviste til deres forretningsbetin- gelser, hvoraf det fremgår, at der kun ydes erstatning for alternativ befordring til den DSB-station, som passageren har billet til og kun i de tilfælde, hvor passageren enten ikke kunne opnå forbin- delse til dagens sidste tog, eller hvis ventetiden fra togankomsten til næste togforbindelse var me- re end én time. DSB S-tog anførte desuden, at der skal gives forhåndstilsagn fra DSB, førend der kan tages en taxa, som senere kan refunderes af DSB S-tog, samt at hvis en forsinkelse er på me- re end 30 minutter, kan passagerens kompenseres i forhold til DSB Rejsetidsgaranti Basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyse Af Mulighederne for Automatisk S-Banedrift
    Analyse af mulighederne for automatisk S-banedrift Indhold 1. Sammenfatning ....................................................................................... 5 2. Indledning ............................................................................................... 8 2.1. Baggrund og formål ......................................................................... 8 2.2. Udvikling og tendenser .................................................................. 10 2.3. Metode og analysens opbygning ..................................................... 11 2.4. Forudsætninger for OTM-trafikmodelberegningerne .................... 11 2.5. Øvrige forudsætninger ................................................................... 12 3. Beskrivelse af scenarier ......................................................................... 15 3.1. Basis 2025 ...................................................................................... 16 3.2. Klassisk med Signalprogram (scenarie 0) ...................................... 17 3.3. Klassisk med udvidet kørselsomfang (scenarie 1) ......................... 18 3.4. Klassisk med parvis sammenbinding på fingrene (scenarie 2) ..... 19 3.5. Metro-style (scenarie 3) ................................................................. 21 3.6. Metro-style med shuttle tog på Frederikssunds-fingeren (scenarie 4) .................................................................................... 23 3.7. Metro-style med shuttle tog på Høje Taastrup-fingeren (scenarie 5) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tetra Smoothes Efficient Operations for Movia's Transportation Routes In
    CASE STUDY TETRA takes control of transport - by sea, by land Greater Copenhagen and Sealand Region – Denmark. Customer Profile Denmark’s capital, Copenhagen, houses the Royal Family, the Company Danish Parliament, and a number of government and financial Movia Public Transport institutions, as well as international organisations and company Industry Name headquarters. In recent years, economic activity levels have Transportation increased significantly and, with the opening of a rail & road Product Name • Dimetra IP TETRA system bridge between Copenhagen and Malmö (Sweden), the city • MTM700s with Vehicle has become a gateway to Scandinavia and the Baltic Area. Integrated Units Furthermore, the Copenhagen Airport serves as the main airport • MTH800 Hand-portables in northern Europe/Scandinavia. Solution Features • Dimetra IP provides high performance The city boasts a well-developed public transport network in terms • Highly resilient network solution of local trains, metro lines and buses. But increasing traffic levels in • Fast, reliable call set up recent years have led to congestion, which has renewed the focus • GPS Location Service on improving both traffic controls and public transport. Benefits • Voice & text radio communications Regional restructuring creates new communication challenges for Denmark’s largest • Centralised traffic monitoring transport authority. & control Movia Public Transport was formed in 2007, with the merger of HUR Trafik and two local county • Improved business efficiency transit agencies – VT and STS. This was in response to major municipal restructuring undertaken & SLAs by the Danish Government some five years earlier. • Increased passenger satisfaction Today, Movia is Denmark’s largest public transport agency, serving approximately 220 million passengers a year. It covers a population of some 2.4 million in Denmark’s Capital Region (with the exception of Bornholm), including Greater Copenhagen and the rest of the Sealand Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Årsskrift 2015 Ledøje-Smørum Historisk Forening Og Arkiv
    Dette værk er downloadet fra Slægtsforskernes Bibliotek Slægtsforskernes Bibliotek drives af foreningen Danske Slægtsforskere. Det er et special-bibliotek med værker, der er en del af vores fælles kulturarv, blandt andet omfattende slægts-, lokal- og personalhistorie. Slægtsforskernes Bibliotek: http://bibliotek.dis-danmark.dk Foreningen Danske Slægtsforskere: www.slaegtogdata.dk Bemærk, at biblioteket indeholder værker både med og uden ophavsret. Når det drejer sig om ældre værker, hvor ophavsretten er udløbet, kan du frit downloade og anvende PDF-filen. Drejer det sig om værker, som er omfattet af ophavsret, skal du være opmærksom på, at PDF-filen kun er til rent personlig brug. ISSN 0905 8834 Årsskrift 2015 Ledøje-Smørum Historisk Forening og Arkiv Tegninger af Kjeld Johansen og Nya Sebulonsen Årsskrift 2015 Ledøje-Smørum Historisk Forening og Arkiv 1 Foreningens bestyrelse Indhold Formand Anni Agerskov 4465 4720 Forord ........................................................................ 3 Næstformand Ens dåbskander i Ledøje Kirke og sekretær Inga Nielsen 2218 3696 og på De Dansk Vestindiske Øer .............................. 4 Kasserer Niels Henrik Rank 2027 4070 Ledøje Mark – fra nøjsomhed til bynær oase ........... 6 Hans Bindslev 5377 5455 Hans Jacobsen, Porsebakken, fortæller ..................... 9 Finn Sølvbjerg Hansen 4465 9927 Margrethelund - et minisamfund ............................ 12 Line Ludvigsen 4465 3547 Min tilknytning til Ledøje-Smørum ....................... 22 Bent Thygesen 4497 5054 Fritz Herrmann på Hede Enge ................................ 27 Suppleant Finn Larsen 4465 2887 Mine barndomsminder i Ledøje under besættelsen 32 Hannah Rank 2465 6727 Ny i Danmark. Fra Odessa til Smørum................... 37 Revisorer Ebbe Engmark 4465 2829 Ny kunst til Smørum Kirkegård.............................. 45 Svend Waltenburg 4466 0251 Nye genstande fra 2014 ............................................47 Suppleant Birgit Kragh Larsen 4465 9291 Med Historisk Forening i Istanbul 2015 ................
    [Show full text]