Folkeundersøgelse for Brystkræft, Mammografiscreening

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Folkeundersøgelse for Brystkræft, Mammografiscreening REGION HOVEDSTADEN Forretningsudvalgets møde den 11. december 2007 Sag nr. 11 Emne: Brystkræftscreening i Region Hovedstaden - invitationsbrev til målgruppen 3 bilag Folkeundersøgelse for brystkræft I Region Hovedstaden tilbyder vi alle kvinder mellem 50 og 69 år at blive undersøgt for brystkræft med to års mellemrum ved en såkaldt mammografiundersøgelse. Det er naturligvis helt frivilligt, om du vil deltage, men vi har reserveret en tid til dig ____dag den _________ klokken_____ På: Mammografiscreeningsklinikken, Bispebjerg Hospital Bispebjerg Bakke 23, indgang 63, 1.sal Hvis du ønsker en anden tid, kan du ringe til os. Undersøgelsen tager i alt omkring 20 minutter. Fordele og ulemper: At blive undersøgt for kræft, selvom man ikke på forhånd har en mistanke om, at der er noget galt, kan både have fordele og ulemper. På bagsiden af brevet kan du læse mere om dette. Hvis du ikke vil undersøges: Hvis du ikke vil gøre brug af tilbuddet, vil det være en stor hjælp for tilrettelæggelsen af vores arbejde, at du ringer eller mailer og melder fra. Et andet undersøgelsessted: Det er muligt at få foretaget undersøgelsen et andet sted, hvis det er mere bekvemt for dig. I Region Hovedstaden foretager vi brystkræftundersøgelser på Bornholms Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Hillerød Hospital og Hvidovre Hospital. Når du kommer til undersøgelsen, vil vi gerne have, at du: - har udfyldt det vedlagte spørgeskema. Lægerne har brug for spørgeskemaet, når de skal vurdere din undersøgelse - Medbringer røntgenbilleder, hvis du tidligere har fået foretaget en brystkræftundersøgelse på en privatklinik. Indopereret brystprotese: Hvis du har fået indopereret en brystprotese er det en god ide, at du kontakter os telefonisk inden undersøgelsen. Protesen kan i visse tilfælde være en teknisk hindring for undersøgelse af brystet. Hvornår får du svar: Vi sender dig et brev, når vores speciallæger har vurderet billederne. Der går højest 10 arbejdsdage, så har du svaret. Sådan får du kontakt med os: Sekretariatet for Mammografiscreening i Region Hovedstaden træffes på telefon 56 90 90 65 / e-mail til [email protected] mandag til torsdag klokken 8.00 – 15.00 og fredag klokken 8.00 – 13.00. Med venlig hilsen Ilse Vejborg Screeningschef Fordele og ulemper En rutineundersøgelse for kræft i brystet har både ulemper og fordele. Nedenfor kan du læse om det - og på den baggrund kan du veje fordele og ulemper op mod hinanden og selv vælge, om du vil tage imod tilbuddet eller ej. Fordele: Bedre overlevelse: Formålet med at screene – altså undersøge for kræft uden en konkret mistanke om, at der er noget galt hos den enkelte – er at finde kræft så tidligt, at den ikke har spredt sig til andre organer. Dermed forbedres chancen for overlevelse. Tidlig opsporing: Ved mammografi er det muligt at finde en kræftknude på 1 cm eller mindre. Det vil sige før, man kan føle den med hånden. Skånsom behandling: Når sygdommen opdages tidligt og behandles i et tidligt stadium, er der større mulighed for at tilbyde en operation, hvor brystet kan bevares. Mindre efterbehandling: Kemo- eller antihormonbehandling er ofte unødvendig, når man starter behandlingen på et tidligt stadium. Ulemper: Overbehandling: Nogle af de forstadier til brystkræft, som man finder og opererer bort, ville aldrig have udviklet sig til brystkræft, selvom man ikke havde opdaget det. Man kan nemlig ikke udpege de forstadier til brystkræft, der med sikkerhed vil udvikle sig til kræft på længere sigt. Der er usikkerhed om, hvor ofte der sker overbehandling. Falsk alarm: Hvis røntgenbilledet viser nogle forandringer, bliver kvinden indkaldt til en ny undersøgelse. I en del tilfælde viser det sig, at forandringerne er godartede – og at det altså var falsk alarm. Falsk tryghed: Ikke alle kræftknuder kan opdages på et røntgenbillede. Søg læge, hvis du selv finder en knude i brystet. Også selvom du for nylig har været til en rutineundersøgelse og har fået røntgenfotograferet brysterne. Ubehag ved undersøgelsen: Brystet bliver klemt mellem to plader, mens der tages et røntgenbillede. Det varer kun et øjeblik, men nogle kvinder synes, det er ubehageligt. Uroen mens man venter: Selve undersøgelsen og den efterfølgende ventetid kan medføre frygt og uro. Det er forskelligt fra kvinde til kvinde, hvor meget uroen fylder. Du må afveje, om selve undersøgelsen og ventetiden på et svar vil gøre dig så urolig, at du ikke vil acceptere det – eller om svaret tværtimod vil give dig større ro og sikkerhed. Hvis du vil vide mere: Du kan læse mere om brystkræftundersøgelsen i den vedlagte pjece fra Sundhedsstyrelsen. År 2007 Du bedes venligst medbringe det udfyldte spørgeskema. Skemaet 4. Føler du en knude i brystet? bedes besvaret, også selvom du tidligere har udfyldt et skema, Hvis ja - angiv hvor på tegning: da det har betydning for lægernes vurdering af undersøgelsen. Navn: CPR-nr.: Hvor længe har du følt knuden? Er den undersøgt? 1. Får du/har du fået hormontilskud? Hvis ja - fra hvornår? 5. Er du opereret for godartede forandringer eller kosmetisk Får du fortsat hormontilskud? opereret i brysterne? Præparatets navn: Hvis ja - i hvilket bryst? Bruger du Melbrosia, Gelé Royale eller Cimicifuga? Hvornår? 2. Har du fået foretaget mammografier udover 6. Er du opereret for brystkræft? folkeundersøgelsen? Hvis ja - i hvilket bryst? Hvis ja - hvornår? Hvornår? Hvor? På hvilket sygehus? Medbring venligst røntgenbillederne 7. Ønsker du også svar til egen læge? ________________________________________ 3. Er der/har der været brystkræft i den nærmeste familie? Hvis ja – hvem? Revideret den 21.12.2006 IV/ef Praktiske oplysninger RRegionens Logo [Her indsættes lokale/regionale informationer] Mammografi – screening SpørgSmål og information for brystkræft Hvis du har spørgsmål vedr. mammografi, kan du www. cochrane.dk • Hjemmeside for det Nordiske spørge din praktiserende læge eller søge oplysninger Cochrane Center på følgende hjemmesider: www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk • Engelsk hjemmeside www.sundhed.dk • Det offentlige sundhedssystem for National Health Service Screening Programmes www.sst.dk • Sundhedsstyrelsen www.cancercode.org/index.thml • EU’s anbefalinger www.cancer.dk • Kræftens Bekæmpelse vedr. screening og begrundelser herfor. invitation til mammografi Tilbud om undersøgelse regionen inviterer dig hermed til en gratis røntgenundersøgelse af brystet, Du har mulighed for at få en røntgenundersøgelse (en mammografi ), også kaldet mammografi . Dette tilbud gives til alle kvinder mellem 50 og der kan vise, om du har forandringer i brystet. forandringerne kan være 69 år hvert andet år. formålet med undersøgelsen er at fi nde de kvinder, vandcyster, godartede knuder og små forkalkninger. De kan også være der har tidlige stadier af brystkræft, for at kunne tilbyde tidlig behandling. egentlige kræftknuder eller tidlige stadier af kræftknuder, der er så små, at du endnu ikke kan føle dem med hånden. [Her indsættes lokale/regionale informationer] Du kan få mere at vide om mammografi undersøgelsen ved at læse denne pjece. På bagsiden er der oplysninger om, hvor undersøgelsen foregår, og hvor du kan få yderligere oplysninger. Hvis du ikke ønsker information eller undersøgelse, kan du kontakte screeningsklinikken og framelde dig ordningen, se pjecens bagside. Herefter vil du hverken modtage rykkerskrivelser eller fl ere invitationer. Du kan til enhver tid tilmelde dig igen. Tilbudet om mammografi til alle kvinder mellem 50 og 69 år hvert andet år gives på baggrund af erfaringer fra udlandet, der viser, at den samlede dødelighed af brystkræft falder, når man indfører mammografi screening. sundhedsstyrelsen anbefaler screening efter en samlet afvejning af undersøgelsens fordele og ulemper. ‘screening’ betyder her undersøgelse af en befolkningsgruppe for at opspore brystkræft i et tidligt stadium. Manuskript: Sundhedsstyrelsen/Komiteen for Sundhedsoplysning. Illustrationer: Polfoto 1 Uroen mens man venter Fordele og ulemper Selve undersøgelsen og venten på svar kan medføre frygt og uro. Det er Mammografi kan have både fordele og ulemper, som kun du selv kan veje forskelligt fra kvinde til kvinde, om uroen får en dominerende plads, eller op mod hinanden: om den føles overkommelig. Fordele Du må afveje, om selve undersøgelsen og venten på svar vil gøre dig urolig • Bedre overlevelse: Formålet med at screene er at finde kræft så tidligt, i en grad, du ikke vil acceptere, eller om svaret tværtimod vil give dig større at den ikke har spredt sig til andre organer – og dermed forbedre ro og sikkerhed. chancen for overlevelse. tal med andre om det, hvis bekymringen om brystkræft fylder • Tidlig opsporing: Ved mammografi er det muligt at finde en kræftknude uforholdsmæssigt meget eller varer længe. på 1 cm eller mindre. Dvs. før man kan føle den med hånden. • Skånsom behandling: Når sygdommen opspores og behandles i et tidligt stadium, er der større mulighed for en brystbevarende operation. • Mindre efterbehandling: Kemo- eller antihormonbehandling er ofte unødvendig ved behandling af tidlige stadier. Ulemper • Overbehandling: Man kan ikke udpege de forstadier til brystkræft, der med sikkerhed vil udvikle sig. Nogle af de forstadier, som man finder og opererer bort, ville aldrig have udviklet sig til brystkræft, selv om man undlod operation. Der er endnu usikkerhed om, hvor ofte der sker overbehandling. • Falsk alarm: Hvis røntgenbilledet viser nogle forandringer, bliver kvinden indkaldt til en ny undersøgelse. I en del tilfælde viser det sig, at forandringerne er godartede – og at det altså var falsk alarm.. • Falsk tryghed:
Recommended publications
  • ADDRESSING the METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE in BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix
    ADDRESSING THE METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE IN BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix. Case studies of five metropolitan areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich Case Studies of Five Metropolitan Areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich is part of the study Addressing Metropolitan Challenges in Barcelona Metropolitan Area, which was drafted by the Metropolitan Research Institute of Budapest for the Barcelona Metropolitan Area (AMB). The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone, and the AMB cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. © Àrea Metropolitana de Barcelona June 2018 Table of contents Amsterdam . 29 Copenhagen ....................................................... 36 Greater Manchester ................................................ 42 Stuttgart .......................................................... 52 Zürich ............................................................. 60 Addressing the Metropolitan Challenge in AMB. Case Studies AMSTERDAM (Netherlands) 1. National level framework 1.1. Formal government system The Netherlands is a constitutional monarchy with that is, only binding to the administrative unit which a representative parliamentary democracy and a has developed them (OECD 2017a:21). Aside from decentralised unitary state, characterised by a strong establishing the general legal framework and setting a political tradition of broad consensus seeking in policy strategic course, the state defined
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic and Mobility Plan for the Capital Region of Denmark a Better Framework for a Coherent Everyday Life
    Traffic and Mobility Plan for the Capital Region of Denmark A better framework for a coherent everyday life This Traffic and Mobility Plan focuses on enhancing mobility for all citizens and commuters travelling in the Capital Region of Denmark at times when congestion is worst and pressure on the region’s infrastructure is highest. The plan provides an overview and an understanding of the transport challenges in the capital region. Through analysis and debate with key players the plan identifies strategic development themes and initiatives to address increasing congestion and create a coherent transport system. The plan's initiatives will help create the conditions for a more streamlined experience of public transport by reducing time wasted in the transport system and by contributing to a green transition of public transport. 20% more trips in 2035 Due to significant population growth in the capital region the transport network should be able to handle 20% more trips in 2035 which puts pressure on the entire transport system. Forecasts predict that car drivers in the capital region will waste 33.4 million hours in 2035 due to congestion and it is not possible to resolve this solely by expanding the road network. A holistic approach The needs for mobility and options available vary over the region’s different geographical areas and given high commuting rates – both within and to and from surrounding regions – there must be more options available to ensure effective mobility across the entire region. This calls for a holistic and cross-cutting approach to traffic planning based on people’s individual travel needs and the possibility to choose and combine freely between different modes of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Conditions for the Danish Travelcard Rejsekort
    Terms and conditions for the Danish travelcard Rejsekort Version 6.5 UK Effective from 27 September 2016 1 CONTENTS Rejsekort terms and conditions ...................................................................................................... 4 1. About Rejsekort and Pendlerkort ...................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is a Rejsekort ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 What is a Pendlerkort...................................................................................................... 5 1.3 How to use a Rejsekort and a Pendler kort ......................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Rejsekort ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Pendlerkort .................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Card issuer ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Prices and fees ............................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Card types and validity .................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Customer Types .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tetra Smoothes Efficient Operations for Movia's Transportation Routes In
    CASE STUDY TETRA takes control of transport - by sea, by land Greater Copenhagen and Sealand Region – Denmark. Customer Profile Denmark’s capital, Copenhagen, houses the Royal Family, the Company Danish Parliament, and a number of government and financial Movia Public Transport institutions, as well as international organisations and company Industry Name headquarters. In recent years, economic activity levels have Transportation increased significantly and, with the opening of a rail & road Product Name • Dimetra IP TETRA system bridge between Copenhagen and Malmö (Sweden), the city • MTM700s with Vehicle has become a gateway to Scandinavia and the Baltic Area. Integrated Units Furthermore, the Copenhagen Airport serves as the main airport • MTH800 Hand-portables in northern Europe/Scandinavia. Solution Features • Dimetra IP provides high performance The city boasts a well-developed public transport network in terms • Highly resilient network solution of local trains, metro lines and buses. But increasing traffic levels in • Fast, reliable call set up recent years have led to congestion, which has renewed the focus • GPS Location Service on improving both traffic controls and public transport. Benefits • Voice & text radio communications Regional restructuring creates new communication challenges for Denmark’s largest • Centralised traffic monitoring transport authority. & control Movia Public Transport was formed in 2007, with the merger of HUR Trafik and two local county • Improved business efficiency transit agencies – VT and STS. This was in response to major municipal restructuring undertaken & SLAs by the Danish Government some five years earlier. • Increased passenger satisfaction Today, Movia is Denmark’s largest public transport agency, serving approximately 220 million passengers a year. It covers a population of some 2.4 million in Denmark’s Capital Region (with the exception of Bornholm), including Greater Copenhagen and the rest of the Sealand Region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scandinavian Way to Better Public Transport
    THE SCANDINAVIAN WAY TO BETTER PUBLIC TRANSPORT HOW INNOVATION, DEVOLUTION AND Wellington House, T 0113 251 7204 40-50 Wellington Street, E [email protected] FRANCHISING IS GETTING RESULTS Leeds LS1 2DE www.urbantransportgroup.org FOR PASSENGERS AND CITIES INTRODUCTION CONTENTS This report has been prepared by the Transport Introduction .....................................................................................................2 Research Institute at Edinburgh Napier University Report overview and summary ................................................................... 4 in collaboration with colleagues in Norway, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. Denmark ..........................................................................................................12 The main objective of the report, commissioned by Norway ............................................................................................................ 30 the Urban Transport Group (UTG), is to review the experiences Sweden ........................................................................................................... 50 of franchising public transport services in these countries, References ..................................................................................................... 70 to understand why franchising has been chosen by these countries as a way of organising local and regional public transport services, and to present information on the impacts of this choice. Furthermore, in so doing, much information
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen and Its Region
    TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 9 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORT POLICY PROCESSES COPENHAGEN AND ITS REGION CREATE PROJECT Congestion Reduction in Europe, Advancing Transport Efficiency TECHNICAL NOTE PREPARED BY: Charlotte Halpern & Caterina Orlandi Sciences Po, Centre d’études européennes et de politique comparée (CEE), CNRS, Paris, France CREATE has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 636573 Comparative Analysis of Transport Policy Processes - Copenhagen and its region 1 // 9 THE CREATE PROJECT IN BRIEF Transport and mobility issues have increased in relevance on political agendas in parallel with the growing share of EU population living in cities, urban sprawl and climate change. In view of the negative effects of car use, there is a renewed interest about the role that transport should play in the sustainable city. The CREATE project explores the Transport Policy Evolution Cycle. This model is a useful starting point for understanding how this evolution took place, and the lessons that we can learn for the future. Within the CREATE project, the study coordinated by the Sciences Po, CEE team (WP4) explores the historical evolution of transport policies and processes – from ‘car-oriented’ to ‘planning for city life’ – in five European cities (Berlin, Copenhagen, London, Paris, Vienna). Paying attention to case-specific contextual factors, policy instruments and programmes and involved stakeholders, this comparative analysis unveils the processes and the main drivers for change. This technical note concerns Copenhagen and its region. DID YOU KNOW? COPENHAGEN'S TRANSPORT SUMMARY FINDINGS NETWORK IS: ROADS Copenhagen is considered to be a ‘gold standard’ example ROAD NETWORK 1.020 km of the liveable city.
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen Airport P.O
    KITE Deliverable No. 1: Central Issues in Passenger Intermodality Page 106|168 COPENHAGEN AIRPORT P.O. Box 74 Lufthavnsboulevarden 6 DK-2770 Kastrup Denmark Technical features Available modes: Aircraft, metro, interurban/urban train, international/interurban/urban bus, taxi, private car Location: about 8 km south of Copenhagen City Centre in Kastrup Developed area: 11.8 km² Passengers per year: 21.4 million (2007) Take-offs and landings per year: 257 591 (2007) Number of runways: 3 Number of airlines: 58 Long-distance trains per year: N/A Regional Trains per year: N/A (Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org, by Thierry Caro, 06/2008) Long-distance buses per year: N/A Regional buses per year: N/A Number of local public transport lines: approx. 7 Number of parking spaces: 11 700 Number of direct road exits: 3 General Information Copenhagen Airport with about 21.4 Mio. passengers in 2007 is located about 8 kilometres south of the city centre of Copenhagen in Kastrup, a town on the island of Amager. Therefore the formal name is still Copenhagen Airport, Kastrup. Founded in 1925, Copenhagen Airport was one of the first civil airports in the world. Copenhagen Airport is the main airport of Scandinavia. Direct available connections to a total of 132 destinations worldwide (19 Intercontinental, 84 European, 22 Nordic and 7 Domestic) underline the function as a transfer airport for air traffic between other parts of the world and many national and regional airports in Scandinavia and the area south of the Baltic Sea. After the end of World War II Copenhagen Airport was ready for tremendous growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Barometer
    2014 Barometer The barometer is produced by CRTM Madrid Foreword It is a great privilege to present you the EMTA Barometer 2014, that celebrates its tenth edition. Since 2004 this Barometer has been shaped into an easy accessible overview of key figures, performances and mobility indicators of EMTA’s transport authorities in 24 larger cities and metropolitan areas in Europe and one valued partner (Montreal, Canada). For over more than a decade the EMTA Barometer is meticulously produced by Madrid’s Regional Public Transport Authority (CRTM) into a trusted observatory of performance to the composition of this leaflet. Adding value to this 2014 Barometer are new features such as the key missions and policy objectives of EMTA-members and the mapping of the core of the transport area set off against the actual inner city perimeters. It provides an impression of each authority’s administrative area set off against the actual city limits. EMTA members have outdone themselves to collect harmonised data on supply and demand on 2014 in compliance with the indicators defined. An exhaustive collation of unified data of the network in term of demand, supply and costs and revenues may sometimes be constraint by regulations aimed at protecting sensitive business data from stakeholders and their businesses, to avoid business development data to be unduly compromised. Nevertheless, authorities showed perseverance to acquire the scaled indicators to the best of their abilities, making this edition a fine tool to monitor basic figures and review the comparative progress of mobility in their areas. To compare authorities on a consistent range of key indicators is often a demanding exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen Metro Enjoys a Staggering 400% Increase in Ticket Control Efficiency with Zebra Enterprise Devices
    SUCCESS STORY METROSELSKABET Copenhagen Metro Enjoys A Staggering 400% Increase In Ticket Control Efficiency With Zebra Enterprise Devices Metroselskabet is responsible for the 24/7 operation and infrastructure of the Copenhagen Metro and the Copenhagen Light Rail system. It is a partnership, owned jointly by the City of Copenhagen (50%), the Danish Government (41.7%) and the City of Frederiksberg (8.3%). The 20.4-kilometre system opened between 2002 and 2007 and currently has two lines, M1 and M2, and 22 stations, of which 9 are underground. The driverless metro SUMMARY serves the capital and the municipalities of Frederiksberg and Tårnby; trains Customer run every 3 minutes at peak times and carry over 60 million passengers every year. A further two lines are opening in the near future. The driverless light metro supplements the larger S-train rapid transit system and is Metroselskabet I/S integrated with DSB local trains and Movia buses. Partners Challenge Diebold Nixdorf A/S A key aim for Metroselskabet is to maintain fluid passenger movement. As such, the metro does not have ticket barriers, just a check-in and check-out Globeteam A/S booth for users to activate and register their cards or e-tickets; guards then conduct regular ticket controls on the trains or platforms, to check users Industry have actually registered their tickets for that journey. T&L Challenge When Metroselskabet updated its ticket system to an e-ticketing system Metroselskabet needed a reliable, future- proof Enterprise device for speedy ticket to include Mifare Rejsekorts (similar to London’s Oyster cards), it needed checking by guards on Copenhagen’s metro mobile devices to scan the tickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Documents For
    Contract documents for A17 - Invitation to tender for regular bus services in Movia Trafikselskabet Movia Contracts February 2018 A17 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 6 Table of contents 1. General Conditions of Contract ...................................................................................... 10 1.1 Questions ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Prequalification .............................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 Request for prequalification .................................................................................... 11 1.2.1.1 Completion of eESPD ....................................................................................... 12 1.2.2 Grounds for exclusion ............................................................................................. 13 1.2.3 Suitability ................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.4 Selection.................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.5 Documentation for suitability and fulfilment of selection criteria ............................. 13 1.3 Submission of tenders ................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Tenderers ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOLL Presentation
    Funded by the Government The Danish Ministry of Energy, Utilities and Climate The Capital Region of Denmark - Vækstforum hovedstaden Region Zealand Consortium Partners Albertslund Municipality Gate 21 DTU Photonics DOLL a Photonics GreenLab 42 Municipalities 5 Universities +40 Companies & Utility providers Digitalization a new Basic Conditions 1:1 DOLL Living Lab DOLL a Photonics GreenLab Albertslund – en del af Greater Copenhagen Albertslund – en del af Greater Copenhagen Albertslund – en del af Greater Copenhagen Largest facility in Europe • Location: A suburb to Copenhagen, industrial/commercial area, 10.000 employees • Area: 1,5 km2, 12 kilometres of road and bicycle lanes, our sandbox environment • Zones: 49 zones with Lighting and smart city-technology • IoT-infrastructure: 5 types of digital networks • Sensor network: For waste, parking, air quality, noise, temp., etc. • Intelligent lighting network: 435 connected light points, IP-address, real time control • Intelligent lighting solutions: 80 different lighting lumieres • Management systems: 20+ systems • Data platforms: 1 DOLL a Photonics GreenLab 50+ Partner Companies in DOLL Living Lab 50+ Gate 21 Partners Delux Denmark Philips Danmark TDC Paradox Riegens Alfred Priess LITE Big Belly Swarco Danmark Citelum Amplex Joca Focus Lighting Dong Energy Schreder Sensity Thorn Lighting EnergiMidt Force Technology TviLight X-Light SEAS NVE Ewo Wastecontrol Fagerhult Zumtobel Group Lightwell Exlumi Osram Danintra LED-mark ITS CommuniThings Byteblocs Rosa Smart Bin NordSense Schneider Kuben
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Accessibility of Public Transport Information for the Blind
    Improving Accessibility of Public Transport Information for the Blind An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science on April 30, 2018. Submitted by ● Caroline Flynn ● Jacob Komissar ● Jaclyn Panneton ● Alyssa Paul Submitted to ● Advisors o Professor Holly Ault o Professor Constance Clark o Worcester Polytechnic Institute ● Sponsor o John Heilbrunn o Jesper Holten o Danish Association of the Blind This report represents the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. Abstract Information that sighted commuters take for granted in Copenhagen’s public transportation network is often inaccessible to people who are blind or partially sighted. We identified potential improvements to the accessibility of transit information to recommend to the Danish Association of the Blind. We determined the main challenges blind and partially sighted people face when accessing transit information; observed the current accessibility of the system; and evaluated accessible solutions to identify the best potential improvements. Based on our findings, we recommend expanded use of audio announcements, stricter regulation for bus operators, increasing the accessibility of mobile phone applications, and the implementation of beacon technology in the bus system. ii Executive Summary Introduction The United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) affirms that all people have a right to participate in society; but people who are blind or partially sighted often face obstacles that obstruct that right (American Foundation for the Blind, n.d.; Blind find difficulties accessing public transport, 1999; Demmitt, 2014).
    [Show full text]