DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M The influence of political structures and local community engagement on placemaking in train stations A case study of Glostrup Multifunctional Station Sustainable Cities Thesis Aalborg University of Copenhagen Mohammad Ghannam Study No. 2094407 Date: October 2th, 2019 Abstract Traditionally the development of a train station focuses on transportation manners for commuters. The challenge in modern train stations is the quality of the public space, which adds value to citizens through sustainable measures. It is crucial to strengthen participation for better development of train stations. There is a lack of involvement, and throughout the thesis, it is demonstrated that the argument is two- folded. The first one is local, about local development, inclusion, and achieving locally sustainable objectives. The other is about the system level. In order to handle the urbanization, new ways of governing are fundamental to achieve an optimal train station that comprehends all aspects of the transportation system. In a paradigm of transport where time-travel is at the center, there is not enough focus on the quality of the trip as a whole for people. The quality of the space is affected by the existing infrastructure that puts some limitations on the recreation of the place. Other challenging aspects of urban spaces, at the stations, are better transport modes, energy-efficiency, pollution reduction and policy framework. The focus on train stations is relevant for the development of sustainable cities since it offers quality of life, efficient connectivity, optimal and innovative use of public spaces and reduction of human footprint. The purpose of this thesis is to explore the influence of the political structure and the local community concerning strengthening placemaking in train stations. The paper seeks to examine the complexities of stakeholders’ involvement to govern the process to achieve the concept of placemaking. The theoretical framework focuses on the governance approach used in the Glostrup project, which shows that there is a need for a proactive strategy that strengthens the public space on stations. Through interviews with key stakeholders related to Glostrup station’s development, their fluctuating involvement in the process illustrates the upcoming barriers of engaging the local community to contribute to the municipality's plans and strategy. In conclusion, the political framework put forward by the City Council is pivotal for the development of the train station to manage sustainable objectives and strengthen the quality of the public space. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of including key actors’ interests through co-finance and public-private partnerships. I Acknowledgement I am thankful for all the support I received in the last semester. I want to express the greatest appreciation to my supervisor, associate professor, Andres Felipe Valderrama Pineda from Aalborg University in Copenhagen for his solid constructive suggestions. Furthermore, I would like to offer a special thanks to the urban planner Rasmus Hansen from Glostrup Municipality and City Council member Piet Papegeorge for giving comprehensive inside knowledge. Additionally, express gratitude to Jimi Okstoft, Emma Liisberg and Søren Ipsen for accepting to be interviewed in order for giving me knowledge on the subject. Lastly, I would like to thank all the people that participated in the survey. II Table of Content Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... I Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................... II List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... V List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... VI 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem analyses............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Research question ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Case study ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Description of the station and surroundings (Original thesis) ................................................. 9 1.4 29 principles (Original thesis) ....................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Delimitation .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.0 Theory ............................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Litterateur review .......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Concept of placemaking................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Governance ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.4.1 Urban governance .................................................................................................................. 18 2.4.2 The concept of Good Governance ......................................................................................... 19 2.4.3 From governance to New Public Governance ....................................................................... 20 2.4.4 Governance and placemaking ................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Co-creation and Public Participation ............................................................................................ 22 2.5.1 Public participation ................................................................................................................ 24 2.6 Combination of Theoretical approaches excerpt .......................................................................... 28 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3.1 Research design............................................................................................................................. 30 3.2 Qualitative research ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.3 Stakeholder analysis ...................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.1 Stakeholders analysis of Glostrup Station ................................................................................. 33 3.4 Qualitative interviews ................................................................................................................... 35 3.5 Survey ........................................................................................................................................... 36 3.6 Document analysis ........................................................................................................................ 37 4 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................ 40 III 4.1 Stakeholder analysis ...................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Governance and Decision-making process ................................................................................... 47 4.2.1 The process ................................................................................................................................ 49 4.2.2 The governance structure - Place-sensitive project ............................................................... 56 4.3 Type of co-creation ....................................................................................................................... 59 4.4 Guidelines for the vision from Gehl Architects ............................................................................ 59 4.4.1 Public hearing period ............................................................................................................. 60 4.5 Gate 21 project .............................................................................................................................. 61 4.6 The influence on placemaking ...................................................................................................... 63 4.6.1 Sense of community ............................................................................................................... 64 4.6.2 Sense of place........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basisprojekt 3
    Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Basisprojekt 3 3. semester - E20 Eksamensgruppe nr. og HOLD: V2024809828 Projekttitel: Unge, bæredygtighed og offentligt transport i Storkøbenhavn Gruppens medlemmer: Axel Østergaard Penny 68922 Hamza Yalmaz Mahmood 68898 Matilde Kirkegaard Nielsen 69229 Mathias Jarlbæk Mathias mod 68838 Amir Mohamad Issa 68879 Martine Ulvedal Wrona 68850 Vejleder: Kim Sandholt Dato: 06/01-2021 Side 1 af 76 Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Abstract This project incorporates the dimensions “Subjectivity, Technology and Society”, “Design & Construction”, and “Scientific Theory”. The assignment is focused on the sustainable and environmentally friendly aspects of public transport systems. The report goes on to explore how green and sustainable public transport truly is, and how we can make people between the ages of 18 to 29 play a bigger part in slowing down the global CO₂ emissions by choosing public transportation. In this project we have conducted two interviews to gather knowledge on the danish youth, in terms of their use of public transportation. We have come to learn that the youth disregard the environmental benefits that public transport has to offer due to prioritizing convenience and simplicity. Therefore we designed an explainer video with the purpose of making public transport seem appealing for the youth, based on their opinions. Side 2 af 76 Penny (68922), Mahmood (68898), Basis Projekt 3 Nielsen (69229), Kornmod (68838), 06/01-2021 Issa (68879), Wrona (68850) Gruppenr: V2024809828 Indholdsfortegnelse Abstract 2 Indholdsfortegnelse 3 Indledning 5 Problemfelt 5 Problemformuleringen 6 Arbejdsspørgsmål 6 Offentlig transport i dagens Danmark 7 Afgrænsning 8 Semesterbindingen 9 Teori 9 Postfænomenologi og Fænomenologi 9 Kampagneteori 11 Målgruppe 11 Effekthierarki 13 Grundmodel vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    Hovedstadens I Letbane Hovedstadens S Letbane I/S Annual Report Annual Report Hovedstadens Letbane I/S Metrovej DK- Copenhagen S CVR number: T + E [email protected] Read more about the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail at dinletbane.dk Cover visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Layout, e-Types Printing, GraphicUnit ApS ISBN number: ---- EMÆR AN KE V T S Tryksag 5041 0473 Annual Report 2019 Contents Foreword 05 2019 In Brief 06 Directors’ Report 08 Results and Expectations 08 Status of the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail 16 Design 22 Communication 23 Safety on the Right Track 25 Corporate Management 26 Compliance and CSR Report 27 Annual Accounts 35 Accounting Policies 36 Accounts 39 Management Endorsement 59 Independent Auditors’ Report 60 Appendix to the Directors’ Report 65 Long-Term Budget 66 3 The Light Rail will run under the viaduct at Buddingevej before continuing up to Lyngby Station. Visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Annual Report 2019 Foreword The Greater Copenhagen Light Rail will be 2019 was the year in which the Light Rail In May, the design of the coming Light Rail part of the public transport network that construction activities got underway and trains was decided on. The trains will be will enable residents, commuters and busi- the project became visible in several places green and will thereby have their own iden- nesspeople to get around in an easy, fast and along Ring 3. The major preparatory works tity in relation to the other modes of trans- more environmentally friendly way. When it at Lyngby Station, Buddinge Station and the port in the Greater Copenhagen area, while goes into operation, the Light Rail will run Control and Maintenance Centre in Glostrup also making it easy to spot the Light Rail in on electricity, which is one of the most en- picked up speed and utility line owners began the cityscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Projektoversigt – Region Hovedstaden Indhold
    Projektoversigt – Region Hovedstaden Indhold Kollektiv transport ............................................................................................ 3 Anlæg af Øresundsperroner på Ny Ellebjerg Station ............................. 3 Anlæg af fjern- og regionaltogsperroner på Glostrup Station .............. 4 Udvidelse af Københavns Lufthavn Station ............................................ 5 Anlæg af vendespor ved Københavns Lufthavn Station ....................... 6 Anlæg af overhalingsspor til godstog ved Kalvebod .............................. 7 Flytning af Herlev Station .......................................................................... 8 Ombygning af Nordhavn Station .............................................................. 9 Anlæg af vendespor til S-tog ved Carlsberg Station ............................. 10 Metrodrift på S-banen ............................................................................... 11 Hastighedsopgraderinger på S-banen ..................................................... 12 Forenkling af Københavns Hovedbanegård ......................................... 13 Opgradering af Hillerød Station .............................................................. 14 Forskønnelse af Nørreport Station ......................................................... 15 VVM-undersøgelse og anlæg af metro til Lynetteholm og Nordøstamager .......................................................................................... 16 Analyse af metrodrift på Kystbanen ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DSB S-Tog A/S
    AFGØRELSE FRA ANKENÆVNET FOR BUS, TOG OG METRO Journalnummer: 2012-0102 Klageren: XX 5700 Svendborg Indklagede: DSB S-tog A/S Klagen vedrører: Refusion af taxaregning på 182 kr. grundet forsinkelse. Ankenævnets sammensætning: Nævnsformand, landsdommer Tine Vuust Ingrid Dissing (2 stemmer) Lise Bjørg Pedersen Torben Steenberg SAGSFREMSTILLING: Klageren reklameret til indklagede: 8. marts 2012. Klagegebyr modtaget i ankenævnet: 16. marts 2012. Sagens omstændigheder: Klageren skulle den 5. marts 2012 rejse fra Glostrup til Svendborg. Grundet hærværk blev klage- rens S-tog mellem Glostrup station og Høje Taastrup station aflyst, og det efterfølgende tog med planlagt ankomst 20 minutter efter, blev 10 minutter forsinket. Ifølge klageren var hun nødt til at tage en taxa fra Glostrup station til Høje Taastrup station for at nå sine videre forbindelser, herunder den sidste forbindelse fra Nyborg til Svendborg. Taxaturen blev påbegyndt klokken 20:58 og afsluttet klokken 21:09 og beløb sig til 182 kr., som klageren den 8. marts 2012 søgte refunderet hos DSB S-tog. DSB S-tog afviste den 9. marts 2012 klagerens krav. DSB S-tog henviste til deres forretningsbetin- gelser, hvoraf det fremgår, at der kun ydes erstatning for alternativ befordring til den DSB-station, som passageren har billet til og kun i de tilfælde, hvor passageren enten ikke kunne opnå forbin- delse til dagens sidste tog, eller hvis ventetiden fra togankomsten til næste togforbindelse var me- re end én time. DSB S-tog anførte desuden, at der skal gives forhåndstilsagn fra DSB, førend der kan tages en taxa, som senere kan refunderes af DSB S-tog, samt at hvis en forsinkelse er på me- re end 30 minutter, kan passagerens kompenseres i forhold til DSB Rejsetidsgaranti Basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyse Af Mulighederne for Automatisk S-Banedrift
    Analyse af mulighederne for automatisk S-banedrift Indhold 1. Sammenfatning ....................................................................................... 5 2. Indledning ............................................................................................... 8 2.1. Baggrund og formål ......................................................................... 8 2.2. Udvikling og tendenser .................................................................. 10 2.3. Metode og analysens opbygning ..................................................... 11 2.4. Forudsætninger for OTM-trafikmodelberegningerne .................... 11 2.5. Øvrige forudsætninger ................................................................... 12 3. Beskrivelse af scenarier ......................................................................... 15 3.1. Basis 2025 ...................................................................................... 16 3.2. Klassisk med Signalprogram (scenarie 0) ...................................... 17 3.3. Klassisk med udvidet kørselsomfang (scenarie 1) ......................... 18 3.4. Klassisk med parvis sammenbinding på fingrene (scenarie 2) ..... 19 3.5. Metro-style (scenarie 3) ................................................................. 21 3.6. Metro-style med shuttle tog på Frederikssunds-fingeren (scenarie 4) .................................................................................... 23 3.7. Metro-style med shuttle tog på Høje Taastrup-fingeren (scenarie 5) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • At the Intersection of Research and Innovation
    Get Updated on the Largest Nordic Research and Development Project on Healthcare Technology AT THE INTERSECTION OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION Publisher: Patient@home Issue: 2000 Editor: Anders Lyck Fogh-Schultz, Layout: kreativgrafisk.dk Danish Technological Institute Print: Jørn Thomsen Elbo Photo: Emil Ryge 2 patient@home CONTENTS Foreword . 4 Grant Givers . 5 Patient@home Facts . 6 Monitoring . 8 Cases: Hospital Home ............................................... 10 Innovative Technology Used for Treatment of Wounds............. 12 Spiromagic .................................................. 13 Care in Own Home . 14 Cases: Exoskeleton for the Arm and Shoulder Region ................... 16 Detection and Identification of Body Fluid ....................... 18 Operating System for People with Reduced Cognitive Functions .... 19 Rehabilitative training . 20 Cases: Development of ReHApp ...................................... 22 Rehabilitation with Industrial Robots - Universal RoboTrainer ...... 24 Game Technology for Rehabilitation............................. 26 Patient@home Makes a Midway Evaluation . 28 Information and Knowledge Management . 32 Cases: Acquire-ICD ................................................. 34 Identification of High-Risk Patients............................. 36 DiabeticLink Denmark ........................................ 37 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) . 38 Cases: Adaptive Software Platform for Telemedicine .................... 40 Fast-Track . 42 Cases: Google Glass-testing at OUH
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Poulsen Sustainabillity 20
    Sustainability Report 2020 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 2 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 3 1. A year like no other 4 2. Louis Poulsen at a glance 8 3. Sustainability at Louis Poulsen 13 4. Sustainability in our solutions 26 5. Sustainable operations 40 5.1. Addressing our impact on the climate and the environment 43 5.2. Passionate employees are our most valuable asset 52 6. About this report 63 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 4 1. A year like no other Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 5 1. A year like no other 2020 was a year defined by the global company, we developed and implemented proud to announce that our own produc- This Sustainability Report constitutes we gain throughout the process, we will COVID-19 pandemic, and from the very our Diversity Policy in 2020 to ensure tion facilities in Vejen, Denmark, are now our second annual Communication bring to the next chapter of the evolution beginning, protecting the health and diversity and equal opportunities for solely using renewable electricity as a on Progress to be submitted to the of Louis Poulsen, as we develop new wellbeing of our employees was our main everyone at Louis Poulsen. first step towards our ambitious target of UN Global Compact. We will continue products, new offerings and welcome priority – and it still is. our domestic operations being carbon to support and contribute to the new partnerships in the future. There is Sustainability as a strategic neutral by 2023. development of the principles of the no doubt that all the valuable knowledge With employees all over the world – from target area UN Global Compact and report on we are acquiring will impact and continue LA in the west to Tokyo in the east – we At Louis Poulsen, we know that a We have also been piloting new ways progress annually.
    [Show full text]
  • FREMTIDENS STATIONER OG NYE MOBILITETSLØSNINGER PROJEKTTITEL Fremtidens Stationer Og Mobilitetsløsninger I 2050 Opsamling På Workshop D
    MINIKONFERENCE OM FREMTIDENS STATIONER OG NYE MOBILITETSLØSNINGER PROJEKTTITEL Fremtidens stationer og mobilitetsløsninger i 2050 Opsamling på workshop d. 27. maj 2019 UDARBEJDET AF: Region Hovedstaden med støtte af: Aalborg Universitet KONSULENTBISTAND OPSAMLING - Minikonferencen om fremtidens stationer og nye mobilitetsløsninger OM MINIKONFERENCEN Interreg-projektet “Et sammenhængende transportsystem i Greater Copenhagen” var d. 27. maj 2019 vært ved en minikonference om fremtidens stationer og mobilitetsløsninger. Der var i alt knap 50 deltagere fra kommuner, regioner, trafikselskaber samt øvrige organisationer fra begge sider af Øresund. Minikonferencen havde to formål: • At præsentere en række aktuelle projekter og initiativer relateret til stationsforbedringer samt nytænke og udvikle den kollektive transport i de tyndere befolkede områder. • At skabe bro til workshoppen "Fremtidens stationer og nye mobilitetsløsninger i 2050", som blev afholdt 2. maj 2019, og hvor der blev arbejdet med at identificere vigtige initiativer og hændelser i relation til fremtidens mobilitetsløsninger i 2050. Konferencen omfattede dels en række faglige indlæg, dels et workshoparbejde, hvor der blev arbejdet videre med at kvalificere og identificere tidshorisonten for de initiativer og hændelser, som var blevet kortlagt i den tidligere workshop. Gruppearbejdet på minikonferencen ar således et bidrag til en backcasting af ønskelige/nødvendige initiativer fra 2050 til dagens situation. TRE OPLÆG OM STATIONER OG BYUDVIKLING Interreg-projektet Fremtidens Intelligente Mobilitet (FIMO) er knyttet til projektet om et sammenhængende transportsystem i Greater Copenhagen. I regi af FIMO arbejdes bl.a. med udvikling af tre konkret stationsområder: Lund Station, Glostrup Station og Køge Nord Station. På minikonference blev de danske cases præsenteret. Der var yderligere et oplæg om Jernhusen, som er en svenske måde at organisere sig omkring stationsomdannelser.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Udg. Dette Indeks Rummer Personer, Steder Og Begivenheder Fra De Femten Optrykte Bind Information 1943-45. Information Fung
    1. udg. Dette indeks rummer personer, steder og begivenheder fra de femten optrykte bind Information 1943-45. Information fungerede i årene 1943-45 som den illegale presses nyhedsbureau og rummer et hav af oplysninger. Søg: Søgefunktionen i indekset er enkel: Brug pdf-formatets sædvanlige søgefunktion (CTRL f) og søg på et navn, et sted osv. Brug bindnummer og sidetal til at finde det relevante sted i de trykte bind af Information. Bindene af Information er nummereret med romertal I-XV. Indekset muliggør en samlet søgning i de 15 bind. Alternativt kan man blot pdf-søge direkte i de enkelte bind. Vær opmærksom på, personer i indekset er ordnet efter første efternavn – dvs. John Christmas Møller står under Christmas Møller, John. Ved alle navne og steder er Aa fastholdt. Vær også opmærksom på, at Information ikke kun rummer mange oplysninger, men også mange fejl. Der er ikke redigeret i indeks, og fx er enkelte personer omtalt som stikker, nazist osv., fordi de omtales som sådan i Information. Det betyder ikke, at det er dokumenteret, at disse personer var stikkere. I enkelte tilfælde er der med hård parentes gjort opmærksom på fejl. Enkelte hyppige ord og begreber er udeladt (fx Danmark). Baggrund: De 472 illegale numre af Information (samt særnumre og numre udsendt efter den tyske kapitulation sideløbende med udgivelsen af det legale Information) blev udgivet i 15 bind i 1976-78 under redaktion af Jørgen Barfod, Frihedsmuseet, forlægger Jens Nordlunde, Informations redaktør Børge Outze, rektor Palle Schmidt, Esbjerg og antikvarboghandler Lars Zachariassen. Redaktionens bestræbelser på at forsyne bindene med et fælles indeks strandede.
    [Show full text]
  • Course in Powder Technology Analytical Methods for Powder
    Course in Powder Technology Analytical Methods for Powder Handling and Processing Hotel Scandic Glostrup, Copenhagen November 5-6, 2012 The course is for all with a professional interest in powder production as well as powder product quality and analytics. - 1 full day course on particle size, powder measurements techniques, dust formation, product properties and more. - 1 full day with invited presentations from equipment suppliers with time for networking, lab. scale demos and dis- cussion. Language: English Program (5th of Nov.) Program (6th of Nov.) Particle size, shape and distributions Online measurement of moisture, fat and protein Peter Dybdahl Hede, Seydlitz United Consultants ApS content in powder Kenneth Rasmussen, Insatech A/S Particle size measurements (simple, at-line and Measurement of dust in powder online), particle density and measurement thereof Margit Huesmann, Heubach GmbH Peter Dybdahl Hede, Seydlitz United Consultants ApS Online measurement of dust content in air Particle flow properties Kristian Nielsen, Insatech A/S Anders Hallström, AH Process ApS Dynamic image analysis of powders in free fall Gert Beckman/Bjarne Rasmussen, Retsch Technology Particle sampling GmbH & SkanLab A/S Christer Rosén, CHR Food & Health Powder rheology measurement techniques Measuring dust in powder and in process air Mats Larsson, Malvern Anders Hallström, AH Process ApS Particle size measurement with laser diffraction Andrew Lake, Malvern Analysis of various powder properties (wettability, solubility, etc.) and powder composition (moisture, Lab-scale spray drying with Büchi solutions fat, etc.) Mette Kurir Bursell, Holm-Halby Christer Rosén, CHR Food & Health Dynamic image analysis of powders in dispersion Gert Beckman/Bjarne Rasmussen, Retsch Technology GmbH & SkanLab A/S Understanding and Measuring Powder Flow Proper- ties and Powder Behaviour Tim Freeman, Freeman Technology Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring 3 Letbane I/S Annual Report 2014 Contents Ring 3 Letbane I/S
    Ring 3 Letbane I/S Annual Report 2014 Contents Ring 3 Letbane I/S Herlev Annual Report 2014 Contents Contents 1.0 Welcome 4 2.0 Directors' Report 8 2.1 Result for the Year 10 2.2 Company Management 14 2.3 Social Responsibility 16 2.4 Construction of a light railway in Ring 3 18 3.0 Annual Accounts 22 3.1 Accounting Policies 24 3.2 Profit and Loss Account 27 3.3 Balance Sheet 28 3.4 Cash Flow Statement 30 3.5 Notes 31 4.0 Board of Directors of Ring 3 Letbane I/S 38 4.1 Board of Directors of Ring 3 Letbane I/S 40 5.0 Endorsements 42 5.1 Management Endorsement 44 5.2 The Independent Auditors' Report 45 6.0 Appendix to the Directors' Report 46 6.1 Long-Term Budget 48 The English text in this document is an unofficial translation of the Danish original. In the event of any inconsistencies, the Danish version shall apply. 3 Welcome Ring 3 Letbane I/S 1.0 Welcome Dear reader, 2014 was a decisive year for the coming The light railway from Lyngby to Ishøj light railway in Greater Copenhagen. The will intersect the S-train network, with Folketing (Parliament) adopted the Act departures every five minutes in daytime on a Light Railway, and the preparatory hours, ensuring passengers a faster and work commenced. The company that simpler journey across the various areas is to undertake the engineering design, of the capital. The municipalities along construction and operation of the light the light railway will have new opportu- railway was established, and the Board nities to develop urban quarters, attract of Directors began the work of setting new employers and create new commu- the framework for the coming light rail- nal and social facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Erhvervsstyrelsen E-Mail: [email protected]
    Erhvervsstyrelsen E-mail: [email protected] Åbenrå 34 DK-1124 København K (+45) 3085 9000 [email protected] www.arkitektforeningen.dk CVR 62 57 23 10 Høring af forslag til Fingerplan 2019 Dato 19. marts 2019 Arkitektforeningen takker for det tilsendte materiale og for mulighe- den for at afgive høringssvar til høring af forslag til Fingerplan 2019. Generelle bemærkninger Hovedstadsregionen står over for en række udfordringer i fremtiden med en markant øget tilflytning, trængsel på vejene og klimaforan- dringerne, som bliver mere og mere mærkbare. Det centrale styrings- instrument til at løse disse udfordringer er gennem den fysiske plan- lægning, og med Fingerplanen har man et stærkt og formaliseret red- skab til at bruge den fysiske planlægning proaktivt i en regional skala. Det gælder både i forhold til erhvervsudviklingen, bosætningsmøn- stre, transportmønstre og livskvaliteten for alle borgere i hovedstads- regionen. Det er derfor vigtigt, at Fingerplanen, og derved rammerne for den fysiske planlægning og udvikling i Hovedstadsområdet, lø- bende revideres og tilpasses, samtidig med, at de oprindelige og sty- rende principper og grundtanker for Fingerplanen fastholdes. Fingerplanen skal sikre en afbalanceret vækst og udvikling i hele ho- vedstadsområdet og bidrage til at hindre segregering mellem byfing- rene og mellem center og periferi ved hjælp af en overordnet koordi- nering af byomdannelse, byvækst, brug af ledige arealer og hoved- stadsregionens infrastruktur. Dette fordrer en vision for hele hoved- stadsområdet, prioritering og mål for den overordnede planlægning, da et tyndt lag af ukoordinerede initiativer spredt over hele hoved- stadsregionen resulterer i spredt fægtning og ikke får den samlede til- sigtede effekt, i planfaglig forstand.
    [Show full text]