The EARLIER RENAISSANCE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3/s CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924082459706 ^cxiotig of lEuropean literature EDITED BY PROFESSOR SAINTSBURY THE EAELIEE EENAISSANCE PERIODS OF EUROPEAN LITERATURE. Edited by Professor SAINTSBURY. A COMPLETE AND CONTINUOUS HISTORY OF TUB SUBJECT. In 12 Crown 8vo Volumes. "The criticism which alone can much help us for the future is a criticism which regards Europe as being, for inteUectital and spiritual purposes, one great confederation, bound to a joint action and working to a common result.'* —Matthew Arnold. I. The DARK AGES Professor W. P. Ker. II. The FLOURISHING OF ROMANCE AND THE RISE OP ALLEGORY . The Editor. [Heady. III. The FOURTEENTH CENTURY F. J. Snell. [Beady. IV. The TRANSITION PERIOD G. Gregory Smith. [Ready. V. The EARLIER RENAISSANCE . The Editor. [Beady. VI. The LATER RENAISSANCE David Hannay. [Ready. VII. The FIRST HALF OF 17th CENTURY . Professor H. J. C. Grierson. VIII. The AUGUSTAN AGES Oliver Elton. [Ready. IX. The MID-BIGHTBENTH CENTURY J. H. Millar. [Shortly. X. The ROMANTIC REVOLT Professor C. E. Vauqhan. XI. The ROMANTIC TRIUMPH T. S. Omokd. [Ready. XII. The LATER NINETEENTH CENTURY The Editor. CHARLES SORIBNER'S SONS, New York. THE EARLIER RENAISSANCE BY GEOEGE SAINTSBURY, M.A. PROFESSOR OF RHETORIC AND ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH NEW YORK CHAELES SCEIBNEE'S SONS 153-157 FIFTH AVENUE V ' •'/ 1901 ^s,*^ ,^ ^^(ttlo\ 731 ^AS:'- ^^\ PEE FACE. Of the difficulties, as regards delimitation of frontiers, in the designing and editing of a History of Euro- pean Literature by periods, none are more obvious beforehand, or more substantial in experience, than those connected with the all-important and interesting time of the Eenaissance. To that word in general, and to the signification commonly and generally at- tached to it, no serious objection need be taken, when the possible error of supposing any death, or even suspended animation, in the rich and vigorous litera- ture of the Middle Ages is once guarded against. The effect produced on literature by the revived study of the classics, direct from the originals, is a fact of which it is equally impossible to deny the reality or to contest the importance. But it is no less a fact, though a much more complicated one, that this in- fluence was exerted at different times in different 'countries, and in different manners at different times " VI PREFACE. in the same country. Thus, for instance, some, not without plausibility, have carried the Kenaissance in Italy as far back as Petrarch, if not even as far back as Dante—authors dealt with, and necessarily dealt with, not even in the volume preceding this, but in the volume preceding that.^ Still, one of those exercises of the communis soisus, which are generally right, has regarded the Renais- sance of Literature in Europe as not practically be- ginning till the fifteenth century was far advanced, nay, till the various but converging influences of the capture of Constantinople, the invention of printing, the discovery of America, and the final uprising against the ecclesiastical tyranny of Rome had been successively brought to bear. And without further argument on the point of right, we may say that for the purposes of this book " The Earlier Renaissance means the closing years of the fifteenth century and the first half of the sixteenth—the time when, the study of Greek having previously come to support and correct that of Latin in Italy, the full classical culture was transmitted from Italy herself to France and England, and so helped to install, in forms which cannot even to this day be said to have been wholly antiquated, the two greatest literatures of Europe. It is this process—the " Italianation," as the Eliza- bethans called it, of France and of England—which forms for History the central interest of the period, ^ See The Fourteenth Century. PREFACE. Vll and therefore of the volume. As regards Italy herself the interest is somewhat less—great as are some of the names that have to be mentioned as Italian. Such minority is almost necessarily implied in the mere fact of such influence itself, which is, in ac- cordance with a general law, never fully exerted abroad till the forces producing it have passed their first period of energy at home. Ariosto is great—his greatness has been, I think, of late years rather in- sufficiently acknowledged by critics. But it is only necessary to compare him, I do not say with Dante (for the First Three are not in comparison save as standards), but with such a far lower kind of genius as Boccaccio's, to see that the stationary state, if not exactly the age of decadence, has been reached. The poet of the Orlando is, indeed, as much greater in individual gift than Boccaccio as he is lesser than " Dante ; but he wants the wild freshness of morning," the relish of the quest, the closeness to nature and life. His luxuriant imagination turns at times and in parts to the lower, the secondary kinds of literature, to burlesque and grotesque. Compare him again with Spenser, his debtor certainly, though hardly his imi- tator, and the difierence of a falling and a rising tide of poetry will be easily seen. Of the other literatures German presents a problem engagingly interesting in character and most conveni- ently limited in extent—the problem of discovering why the triple influence of Greek and Latin and viii PKEFAOK. did for English Italian failed to do for her what it but different and for French; while the companion dealt with in problem of Spanish has been already Mr Hannay's volume.^ The rest require only very slight treatment. On the other hand, we have in this period, more than in most, the interest of certain general divisions, departments, or kinds of literature which are peculiar to none of the languages, but appear in all. The first of these is the New Drama ; the second, the Eevival of Criticism ; the third, that of Latin writing, which is really literature. This last we have here almost for the last time, and in a more considerable degree than in any volume of our history save that dealing with the Dark Ages, when most of the vernaculars were unborn. It may be questioned whether any man of our time, except Ariosto and Eabelais, has the literary value—intrinsic as distinguished from influential and symptomatic—of Erasmus, and Erasmus is nothing if not a Latinist. The allotment of the first and the longest chapter in the volume to this phenomenon may therefore not seem excessive. The bibliography of the subject is enormous—to give it in any detail would quite overload the notes. Almost every recent German writer seems addictus jurare in verba of L. Geiger, Senaissance und Humanismus in Italien und Deutschland. For Italy, the names of Gregorovius, Burckhardt. Villari, and ' See The Zater Senaissance. PEEFACE. IX many others need no mentioning, save to those who are not likely to take an interest in them. Por France, MM. Darmesteter and Hatzfeldt's Seizihme SUcle en France (Paris, 1878), though it takes the unpretentious form of a collection of extracts for students, with introductions and notes, is one of the very best pieces of literary-historical work that have been produced for many a year and decade. It so happens, however, that as regards great part of the subject we need not go beyond English for text-books of quite, exceptional excellence both in information and original power. To Eoscoe, who led the way some century ago with his still famous Zeo the Tenth and Lorenzo de' Medici, thete is doubtless due the credit not merely of having produced these capital works, but of having stimulated his country- men to follow in his steps. A little later the name of Hallam is to be mentioned with the usual and thoroughly deserved praise for width and co-ordina- tion of knowledge, and for the constant endeavour to maintain a judicial attitude; but also with the usual caution as to the defects of his qualities, shown in his absence of enthusiasm, his distrust of anything ab- normal or extravagant, and as to his necessary ignor- ance of much that is now easily accessible. Mr Symonds' well-known Renaissance in Italy, nearly half of which is devoted to our subject, is both peccant and virtuous in exactly opposite kinds: his fluency and exuberance of language contrasting with X PREFACE. Hallam's measured dignity as his cngowcmcnt and excess contrast with Hallam's rigid justice. But I am bound to say that the more I know of the subject, the better, with some important allowances, do I think of The Renaissance in Italy, With regard to France, Mr Arthur Tilley's most promising intro- ductory volume,^ now sixteen years old, has unfortu- nately never been followed up ; but as an Introduction it is excellent. As for German, Professor Herford's Literary Relations of England and Germany (Cam- bridge, 1886) is one of the most thorough of English literary monographs, and has a far wider bearing on the general subject tlian its title would necessarily indicate. Mr Fronde's Urasmm, with the usual de- fects which infuriate pedants against its author, has, in measure hardly afl'ected at all by age, that author's qualities of artistic-historic grasp, of vivid presentment, and of admirable style ; while Mr Seebohui's earlier 0,iford Reformers has stood the test of examination by more than a generation of specialists with almost unsurpassed success.