DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NPS Form 10-900 I ' RECEIVED 2280 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property____________________________________________________ historic name Kalepolepo Fishpond (Ko'ieHe Fishpond. Ka'onohilu Kal Fishpond)_____ other names/site number State Inventory 50-50-09-1288: Bishop Museum 50-Ma-C3-l_____ 2. Location street & number Kihei Road at Kalepnlepo County Park D not for publication city or town _____Kihei__________________________________ _ D vicinity state Hawal!i code HI county Maui code 009 zip code 9fi7S3 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this IE1 nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property SI meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide H locally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) /\£&3v^K. CJ^^^^-0 11/1/96 Signature of certifying official/Titleicial/Title / \ Date State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property EH meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Date of Action jntered in the National Register. D See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register EH See continuation sheet. EH determined not eligible for the National Register. I I removed from the National Register. D other, (explain:) _________ Kalepolepo Fishpond Maui County, Hawafi Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) D private D building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-local D district buildings [X public-State [Xsite D public-Federal D structure sites D object structures objects Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) SUBSISTENCE / fishing (aquaculture) SUBSISTENCE / fishing RECREATION AND CULTURE 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) OTHER / Traditional Hawaiian foundation _________ walls STONE_____ roof other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) o Fishpond Maui County. Hawaifi Name orProperty County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) ETHNIC HERITAGE: Pacific Islander Jp A Property is associated with events that have made SOCIAL HISTORY________________ a significant contribution to the broad patterns of ARCHAEOLOGY: Prehistoric.Historic Aboriginal our history. INDUSTRY: Traditional aquaculture____ IX] B Property is associated with the lives of persons MARITIME HISTORY significant in our past. 53 C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1500-1880 S D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Hewahewa, David Malo D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. HAWAIIAN D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibilography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 Kl State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National D Local government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: # ______________ D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # _____________ Maul County, Hawafi Name or Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property UTM References old Hawaiian Datum, Glarke 1866 Spheroid (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 2298199 2 2 9 8 3 9 8 3 P^J ^*A£Z i i Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2 lo. 7 6i4 2i5i2 2i 2 9i 81 li 3i 9 4 IP 4 I |7 |6 ,4 |1 ,5 ,8 | |2 ,2 |9 ,8 |3 ,5 ,1 EU See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Theresa K. Donham / Mam Island organization State Historic Preservation Division date April 2, 1996 street & number 130 Mahalani Street_________ telephone (808) 243-5169 city or town Wailuku state Hawai'i zip code 96793 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner____________________________________________ (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name____State of Hawaii (Division of Land Management)_________________ street & number 54 South High Street __ telephone (808) 984-8113 city or town Wailuku_____________ state Hawai'i zip code 96793 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NFS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-001 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Number 7 Page *- Kalepolepo Fishpond Description Setting - Kalepolepo Fishpond (also named Ka'ono'ulu Kai and Ko'ie'ie) is located along the shoreline of Ka'ono'ulu Ahupua'a, within the traditional district of Kula, Island of Maui. The ahupua'a of Ka'ono'ulu is one of six major Kula land divisions which extend from the Ocean to the upper reaches of Haleakala. Ka'ono'ulu is situated near the center of the Kula District, with Pulehunui and Waiakoa to the north and Waiohuli, Keokea and Kama'ole to the south. Ka'ono'ulu is approximately .4 mile wide at the shoreline, and .7 mile wide at Kalepamoa (9,000 ft
Recommended publications
  • The Hawaiian Military Transformation from 1770 to 1796

    The Hawaiian Military Transformation from 1770 to 1796

    4 The Hawaiian Military Transformation from 1770 to 1796 In How Chiefs Became Kings, Patrick Kirch argues that the Hawaiian polities witnessed by James Cook were archaic states characterised by: the development of class stratification, land alienation from commoners and a territorial system of administrative control, a monopoly of force and endemic conquest warfare, and, most important, divine kingship legitimated by state cults with a formal priesthood.1 The previous chapter questioned the degree to which chiefly authority relied on the consent of the majority based on the belief in the sacred status of chiefs as opposed to secular coercion to enforce compliance. This chapter questions the nature of the monopoly of coercion that Kirch and most commentators ascribed to chiefs. It is argued that military competition forced changes in the composition and tactics of chiefly armies that threatened to undermine the basis of chiefly authority. Mass formations operating in drilled unison came to increasingly figure alongside individual warriors and chiefs’ martial prowess as decisive factors in battle. Gaining military advantage against chiefly rivals came at the price of increasing reliance on lesser ranked members of ones’ own communities. This altered military relationship in turn influenced political and social relations in ways that favoured rule based more on the consent and cooperation of the ruled than the threat of coercion against them for noncompliance. As armies became larger and stayed in the field 1 Kirch (2010), p. 27. 109 TRANSFORMING Hawai‘I longer, the logistics of adequate and predictable agricultural production and supply became increasingly important and the outcome of battles came to be less decisive.
  • The Dread Taboo, Human Sacrifice, and Pearl Harbor

    The Dread Taboo, Human Sacrifice, and Pearl Harbor

    The Dread Taboo, Human Sacrifice, and Pearl Harbor RDKHennan The word taboo, or tabu, is well known to everyone, but it is especially interesting that it is one of but two or possibly three words from the Polynesian language to have been adopted by the English-speaking world. While the original meaning of the taboo was "Sacred" or "Set apart," usage has given it a decidedly secular meaning, and it has become a part of everyday speech all over the world. In the Hawaiian lan­ guage the word is "kapu," and in Honolulu we often see a sign on a newly planted lawn or in a park that reads, not, "Keep off the Grass," but, "Kapu." And to understand the history and character of the Hawaiian people, and be able to interpret many things in our modern life in these islands, one must have some knowledge of the story of the taboo in Hawaii. ANTOINETTE WITHINGTON, "The Dread Taboo," in Hawaiian Tapestry Captain Cook's arrival in the Hawaiian Islands signaled more than just the arrival of western geographical and scientific order; it was the arrival of British social and political order, of British law and order as well. From Cook onward, westerners coming to the islands used their own social­ civil codes as a basis to judge, interpret, describe, and almost uniformly condemn Hawaiian social and civil codes. With this condemnation, west­ erners justified the imposition of their own order on the Hawaiians, lead­ ing to a justification of colonialism and the loss of land and power for the indigenous peoples.
  • Visibility Analysis of Oahu Heiau

    Visibility Analysis of Oahu Heiau

    Visibility Analysis of Oahu Heiau A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY May 2012 By Kepa Lyman Thesis Committee: Matthew McGranaghan, Chair Hong Jiang William Chapman Keywords: heiau, intervisibility, viewshed analysis Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... IV INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER OUTLINE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER I. HAWAIIAN HEIAU ............................................................................................................ 8 HEIAU AS SYMBOL ..................................................................................................................................... 8 HEIAU AS FORTRESS ................................................................................................................................. 12 TYPES ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Ad E& MAY 2 6 1967

    Ad E& MAY 2 6 1967

    FEBRUARY, 1966 254 &Ad e& MAY 2 6 1967 Amstrong, Richard,presents census report 145; Minister of Public Abbott, Dr. Agatin 173 Instruction 22k; 227, 233, 235, 236, Abortion 205 23 7 About A Remarkable Stranger, Story 7 Arnlstrong, Mrs. Richard 227 Adms, Capt . Alexander, loyal supporter Armstrong, Sam, son of Richard 224 of Kamehameha I 95; 96, 136 Ashford, Volney ,threatens Kalakaua 44 Adans, E.P., auctioneer 84 Ashford and Ashford 26 Adams, Romanzo, 59, 62, 110, 111, ll3, Asiatic cholera 113 Ilk, 144, 146, 148, 149, 204, 26 ---Askold, Russian corvette 105, 109 Adams Gardens 95 Astor, John Jacob 194, 195 Adams Lane 95 Astoria, fur trading post 195, 196 Adobe, use of 130 Atherton, F.C, 142 ---mc-Advertiser 84, 85 Attorney General file 38 Agriculture, Dept. of 61 Auction of Court House on Queen Street kguiar, Ernest Fa 156 85 Aiu, Maiki 173 Auhea, Chiefess-Premier 132, 133 illmeda, Mrs. Frank 169, 172 Auld, Andrew 223 Alapai-nui, Chief of Hawaii 126 Austin, James We 29 klapai Street 233 Automobile, first in islands 47 Alapa Regiment 171 ---Albert, barkentine 211 kle,xander, Xary 7 Alexander, W.D., disputes Adams 1 claim Bailey, Edward 169; oil paintings by 2s originator of flag 96 170: 171 Alexander, Rev. W.P., estimates birth mile: House, Wailuku 169, 170, 171 and death rates 110; 203 Bailey paintings 170, 171 Alexander Liholiho SEE: Kamehameha IV Baker, Ray Jerome ,photographer 80, 87, 7 rn Aliiolani Hale 1, 41 opens 84 1 (J- Allen, E.H., U.S. Consul 223, 228 Baker, T.J.
  • Environmental Assessment NOS Kihei Facility Project

    Environmental Assessment NOS Kihei Facility Project

    Environmental Assessment NOS Kīhei Facility Project Final Report October 5, 2004 Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Marine Sanctuary Program Prepared By: Under Contract To: Sustainable Resources Group Int’l, Inc. Architects Pacific, Inc. 1916 Young Street, Suite 101 938-C Kapahulu Avenue Honolulu, HI 96826 Honolulu, HI 96816 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Title 42 U.S. Code [USC] Section 4321 et seq.) and National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6, the Department of Commerce (DOC) NOAA has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed construction of a multi-purpose building and connected actions at the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary (HIHWNMS) Headquarters office in Kīhei, Maui, Hawai‘i. The HIHWNMS office is located on 0.457 hectares [1.13 acres] and presently contains four buildings on- site. NOAA has determined that in order for the HIHWNMS to continue to meet its present and future programmatic needs, facility improvements including a multi-purpose building that will provide office, teaching, meeting, and storage space are necessary. The Proposed Action involves demolition and removal of two antiquated storage buildings, construction of a new multi-purpose building, installation of a new parking lot, site landscaping including creation of an outdoor courtyard, and the installation of service utilities (see Section 2). The need for the Proposed Action was investigated following recommendations developed during the planning stage referred to as PHASE ONE – PLANNING of the Project Development, Approval, and Management (PDAM) process carried out by NOAA. As part of PHASE TWO – SCOPING of the PDAM process, NOAA is conducting an Environmental Assessment (EA).
  • Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui

    Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui

    On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui By Alexander Underhill Baer A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Patrick V. Kirch Professor Kent G. Lightfoot Professor Anthony R. Byrne Spring 2015 On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui Copyright © 2015 By Alexander Underhill Baer Table of Contents List of Figures iv List of Tables viii Acknowledgements x CHAPTER I: OPENING THE WATERS OF KAUPŌ Introduction 1 Kaupō’s Natural and Historical Settings 3 Geography and Environment 4 Regional Ethnohistory 5 Plan of the Dissertation 7 CHAPTER 2: UNDERSTANDING KAUPŌ: THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF POWER AND PRODUCTION Introduction 9 Last of the Primary States 10 Of Chiefdoms and States 12 Us Versus Them: Evolutionism Prior to 1960 14 The Evolution Revolution: Evolutionism and the New Archaeology 18 Evolution Evolves: Divergent Approaches from the 1990s Through Today 28 Agriculture and Production in the Development of Social Complexity 32 Lay of the Landscape 36 CHAPTER 3: MAPPING HISTORY: KAUPŌ IN MAPS AND THE MAHELE Introduction 39 Social and Spatial Organization in Polynesia 40 Breaking with the Past: New Forms of Social Organization and Land Distribution 42 The Great Mahele 47 Historic Maps of Hawaiʻi and Kaupō 51 Kalama Map, 1838 55 Hawaiian Government Surveys and Maps 61 Post-Mapping: Kaupō Land
  • Heiau and Noted Places of the Makena–Keone'ö'io Region

    Heiau and Noted Places of the Makena–Keone'ö'io Region

    HEIAU AND NOTED PLACES OF THE MAKENA–KEONE‘Ö‘IO REGION OF HONUA‘ULA DESCRIBED IN HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS (1870S-1930S) This section of the study presents readers with verbatim accounts of heiau and other cultural properties as described by researchers in the region of Honua‘ula—with emphasis on the ahupua‘a of Ka‘eo—since 1916. Detailed research was conducted in collections of the Bishop Museum, Maui Historical Society, Mission Children’s Society Library-Hawaiian Historical Society, and Hawaii State Archives as a part of this study. While a significant collection of references to traditional-cultural properties and historical sites was found, only limited and inconclusive documentation pertaining to the “Kalani Heiau” (Site 196) on the Garcia family property was located. Except for documentation associated with two kuleana awarded during the Mähele of 1848, no other information pertaining to sites on the property was located in the historical accounts. In regards to the “Kalani Heiau,” the earliest reference to a heiau of that name was made in 1916, though the site was not visited, or the specific location given. It was not until 1929, that a specific location for “Kalani Heiau” was recorded by W. Walker (Walker, ms. 1930-31), who conducted an archaeological survey on Maui, for the Bishop Museum. The location of Walker’s “Site No. 196” coincides with that of the “Kalani Heiau” on the Garcia property, but it also coincides with the area claimed by Mähele Awardee, Maaweiki (Helu 3676)—a portion of the claim was awarded as a house lot for Maaweiki. While only limited information of the heiau, and other sites on the property could be located, it is clear that Site No.
  • A Brief History of the Hawaiian People

    A Brief History of the Hawaiian People

    0 A BRIEF HISTORY OP 'Ill& HAWAIIAN PEOPLE ff W. D. ALEXANDER PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM NEW YORK,: . CINCINNATI•:• CHICAGO AMERICAN BOOK C.OMPANY Digitized by Google ' .. HARVARD COLLEGELIBRAllY BEQUESTOF RCLANOBUr.ll,' , ,E DIXOII f,'.AY 19, 1936 0oPYBIGRT, 1891, BY AlilBIOAN BooK Co)[PA.NY. W. P. 2 1 Digit zed by Google \ PREFACE AT the request of the Board of Education, I have .fi. endeavored to write a simple and concise history of the Hawaiian people, which, it is hoped, may be useful to the teachers and higher classes in our schools. As there is, however, no book in existence that covers the whole ground, and as the earlier histories are entirely out of print, it has been deemed best to prepare not merely a school-book, but a history for the benefit of the general public. This book has been written in the intervals of a labo­ rious occupation, from the stand-point of a patriotic Hawaiian, for the young people of this country rather than for foreign readers. This fact will account for its local coloring, and for the prominence given to certain topics of local interest. Especial pains have been taken to supply the want of a correct account of the ancient civil polity and religion of the Hawaiian race. This history is not merely a compilation. It is based upon a careful study of the original authorities, the writer having had the use of the principal existing collections of Hawaiian manuscripts, and having examined the early archives of the government, as well as nearly all the existing materials in print.
  • Pahua Heiau, Maunalua, O‘Ahu

    Pahua Heiau, Maunalua, O‘Ahu

    Ke Kula Wela La o Pahua The Cultural and Historical Significance of Pahua Heiau, Maunalua, O‘ahu Research Division Land, Culture, and History May 2014 Holly Coleman, M.A. Research Analyst Front and Back Cover: Pahua Heiau, Maunalua, O‘ahu. Source: OHA, 2014. 2 Executive Summary OHA received its first landholding, Pahua Heiau, in 1988. Pahua sits on a small 1.15 acre parcel of land located in southeastern O‘ahu in a residential neighbor- hood of Maunalua (which is now known as Hawai‘i Kai). This report seeks to explore the cultural and historical narratives of Pahua Heiau. It is hoped that this effort will renew a modern, collective understanding of Pahua as a wahi pana (storied place) and will guide stewardship practices within OHA. Pahua remains a vital cultural and historical resource for Native Hawaiians and the broader community. The goal of this report is to make important ‘ike ‘äina (intimate and nuanced knowledge about a place) about Pahua Heiau more readily available to the public, and will hopefully inform future decisions about the site. OHA seeks to steward Pahua in a way that fulfills OHA’s kuleana to Native Ha- waiians, honors Pahua as a wahi pana (storied, noted, legendary place), and ac- tively involves the community in care of the site. In particular, Pahua represents an important opportunity to develop and implement strategies that are rooted in traditional Native Hawaiian cultural practices and informed by Native Hawaiian epistemologies in ways that cultivate meaningful, impactful, and long–term stew- ardship. Executive
  • Approved 06/02/05 CULTURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION

    Approved 06/02/05 CULTURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION

    Approved 06/02/05 CULTURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MARCH 18, 2005 A. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Cultural Resources Commission (Commission) was called to order by Chair Lori Sablas at 9:05 a.m., Thursday, March 18, 2005, Waiola Church, Waiola Keopuolani Meeting Hall, 537 Wainee Street, Lahaina, Maui, Hawai`i. A quorum of the Commission was present. (See Record of Attendance.) Ms. Lori Sablas: Aloha kakahiaka. Aloha. Good morning everyone. If you could get seated, we’d like to -- well, those -- hey, the mayor of Lahaina is here. So all those who are there wanting to sign, you’re welcome to come up and sign for agenda items today. So let’s get started. Aloha again. It’s wonderful for us, as the Cultural Resources Commission, to be here and having our meeting here and it’s wonderful to see the wonderful turnout that we have. Thank you community members for coming to this meeting. So I would like to call the meeting to order at this time. Okay, first order of business, as most meetings like this, we’d like to open it up to public testimony. Those of you who are familiar with the agenda items that we have, it is now your time, if you have time constraints, to come up and to speak on any item on the agenda. If you don’t have time constraints and willing to wait as it comes up in the agenda, you’re also welcome to do that. But I’d like to open this meeting with public testimony for those members in the community who are on time constraints and would like to address any time on the agenda at this time.
  • Table 4. Hawaiian Newspaper Sources

    Table 4. Hawaiian Newspaper Sources

    OCS Study BOEM 2017-022 A ‘Ikena I Kai (Seaward Viewsheds): Inventory of Terrestrial Properties for Assessment of Marine Viewsheds on the Main Eight Hawaiian Islands U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region August 18, 2017 Cover image: Viewshed among the Hawaiian Islands. (Trisha Kehaulani Watson © 2014 All rights reserved) OCS Study BOEM 2017-022 Nā ‘Ikena I Kai (Seaward Viewsheds): Inventory of Terrestrial Properties for Assessment of Marine Viewsheds on the Eight Main Hawaiian Islands Authors T. Watson K. Ho‘omanawanui R. Thurman B. Thao K. Boyne Prepared under BOEM Interagency Agreement M13PG00018 By Honua Consulting 4348 Wai‘alae Avenue #254 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96816 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region August 18, 2016 DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, through Interagency Agreement Number M13PG00018 with the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. This report has been technically reviewed by the ONMS and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program Information System website and search on OCS Study BOEM 2017-022.
  • Kekuaokalani: an Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm

    Kekuaokalani: an Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Undergraduate Honors Theses 2018-12-07 Kekuaokalani: An Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm Alex Oldroyd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Oldroyd, Alex, "Kekuaokalani: An Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm" (2018). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 54. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/54 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Honors Thesis KEKUAOKALANI: AN HISTORAL FICTION EXPLORATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ICONOCLASM by Alexander Keone Kapuni Oldroyd Submitted to Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements for University Honors English Department Brigham Young University December 2018 Advisor: John Bennion, Honors Coordinator: John Talbot ABSTRACT KEKUAOKALANI: AN HISTORAL FICTION EXPLORATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ICONOCLASM Alexander K. K. Oldroyd English Department Bachelor of Arts This thesis offers an exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm of 1819 through the lens of an historical fiction novella. The thesis consists of two parts: a critical introduction outlining the theoretical background and writing process and the novella itself. 1819 was a year of incredible change on Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha, the Great Uniter and first monarch of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi, had recently died, thousands of the indigenous population were dying, and foreign powers were arriving with increasing frequency, bringing with them change that could not be undone.