From Urbicide to Socialist Metropole. Swiss Journalists' Views of Warsaw

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Urbicide to Socialist Metropole. Swiss Journalists' Views of Warsaw Matthieu Gillabert FROM URBICIDE TO SOCIALIST METROPOLE. SWISS JOURNALISTS’ VIEWS OF WARSAW AFTER THE SECOND WORLD WAR (1945-1960)1 During the Second World War, Warsaw suffered immense destruction, both human and material. Proportionally, the city suffered most from the conflict2. Therefore, making this trauma visible became a crucial issue in Poland, in po- litical, media, economic, and cultural terms. For Swiss journalists as well as for their readers, this situation was very different from Switzerland’s reality during the conflict. Although this country had been affected by the war, it was largely spared violence and destruction. The communist takeover in Poland further widened the distance. The analysis of how Swiss journalists who vis- ited Warsaw in the first decade after the conclusion of the war tried to bridge this gap is at the heart of this contribution. It focuses not only on the confron- tation between two opposed experiences but also on the ways journalists ob- tained information that was subsequently disseminated in Switzerland. This article on foreign journalists in post-war Poland is part of a history of for- eigners’ travels to dictatorships. Several historical studies have focused on trips 1 The author expresses his gratitude to the Muzeum Warszawy staff and to the colleagues from The Uni- versity of Warsaw Historical Institute for organizing the conference “Foreigners in Warsaw. 1945-2018” (6-7 December 2018), where he presented this paper. He thanks also Audrey Bonvin and Sabine Widmer for their proofreading. 2 The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover From Disaster, eds L.J. Vale, T.J. Campanella, New York 2005, p. 10. 233 Matthieu Gillabert to the USSR during the interwar period3 and more recently to Nazi Germany and to Fascist Italy4. These studies often highlight the control exercised by official in- stitutions over these travels (cultural diplomacy and propaganda, police surveil- lance, etc.) and the representations imported by travelers. Research on travels to the capitals of People’s Democracies still remains very limited. As these cities were deemed closed to cultural exchanges, this foreign presence was frequently hidden. In his monograph comparing the representations of Warsaw and Bucha- rest, Błażej Brzostek analyzed some articles of travelers during the 19th and the 20th centuries. In particular, he showed how Warsaw, a colorful capital, became an exception among the Eastern Bloc capitals in the 1950s5. For Jerzy Kochanows- ki, Warsaw continued to be, if not cosmopolitan like in the interwar period, at least international: first as an exotic capital for refugees from the West and after 1956 as a “promises land” attracting citizens from the socialist countries6. In the post-1956 period, Russian students were shocked by the liberalism they met in the Polish capital, especially in the local student clubs7. The presence of foreign journalists is also a question of truth and legiti- mation. While these journalists played the role of objective observers, guar- antors of the truth, they legitimized the discourse of the inviting authorities. However, to strike a balance, they needed a freedom that could lead them to a heterodox discourse8. It was a subtle game between the ethics of the journal- ists and the political conditions of producing their articles. By focusing on Swiss journalists traveling to Warsaw, this article first aims to understand the local production context of the articles they published in Switzerland. In the Cold War context, information on the situation behind the Iron Curtain was always subject to some control. This control was not only exerted by the authorities of the People’s Republic of Poland, but also on the Swiss side, by governmental organizations or editorial boards9. Despite Swit- zerland’s official policy of neutrality, its elites were joined in strong anticom- munism, which created distrust of the journalists who visited the countries of the Eastern Bloc. To cross the Iron Curtain was already considered subver- sive, at least until the so-called political “thaw”. Second, this foreign perspective on Warsaw from the postwar period un- til the turn of the 1960s aims to demonstrate how different representations of this city were produced through interviews with inhabitants, guided tours, supervision by the Polish government and Swiss humanitarian organiza- 3 R. Mazuy, Croire plutôt que voir?: voyages en Russie soviétique (1919–1939), Paris 2002. 4 F. Sallée, Sur les chemins de terre brune: voyages dans l’Allemagne nazie, 1933-1939, Paris 2017. 5 B. Brzostek, Paryże innej Europy: Warszawa i Bukareszt, XIX i XX wiek, Warszawa 2015. 6 J. Kochanowski, „Foreign Residents in Warsaw, 1945–1956”, Acta Poloniae Historica 2014, 110, p. 111-133. 7 P. Babiracki, “Two Stairways to Socialism: Soviet Youth Activists in Polish Spaces, 1957-1964”, in: Socialist Internationalism in the Cold War. Exploring the Second World, eds. P. Babiracki, J. Austin, MacMillan, 2017, pp. 79-105. 8 N. Domeier, J. Happel, “Journalismus und Politik. Einleitende Überlegungen zur Tätigkeit von Auslandskor- respondenten 1900-1970”, in: Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, Bd. 62, No. 5 (2014), pp. 389-397. 9 M. Gillabert, Dans les coulisses de la diplomatie culturelle suisse : objectifs, réseaux et réalisations (1938- 1984), Neuchâtel, Alphil, 2013. 234 From urbicide to socialist metropole. Swiss journalists’ views... tions in Poland. These reports show a common perception of the city, giving Warsaw a new identity. Lynch wrote that the perception of a city corresponds to a system of representations which is based on the uniqueness, the urban structure as well as emotional and cognitive perceptions10. How did Swiss journalists perceive the image of Warsaw after the War? Moreover, I would like to add a second level of analysis by underlining that representations of otherness always hide representations and discourses about oneself. The historian Robert Frank emphasized that representations based on previous stereotypes reflect – by oppositions, analogies, allusions – a subject’s concerns about himself and his background11. This article addresses these questions during three successive phases af- ter World War II. It starts by focusing on the first journalists who visited the ruins of the Polish capital in the aftermath of the war. In the second part, the analysis of reports and articles written on the occasion of the 5th World Festi- val of Youth and Students shows that this event was a turning point in the rep- resentations of Warsaw in foreign media. Finally, the article focuses on self- representations in the texts about Warsaw written by Swiss journalists after 1956. The political and urbanistic changes in the Polish capital contrasted with the feeling of stagnation in Switzerland shared by some non-conformist jour- nalists. Through these different reports, Swiss journalists consistently made a clear distinction between the communist regime and the Polish people. This could be explained by the radical changes experienced in Poland where the new government appears to the Swiss journalist as an import product from the USSR and by the fact that Polishness was never considered urban. How to report destruction? The after-war period was indeed marked by an important change from the former system of depicting Warsaw. From the beginning of the 20th century until the end of the Second World War, there had only been a few publications about Warsaw in Switzerland. These articles highlighted the city’s cosmopoli- tanism, its exoticism (especially with regard to its poor East-European Jewish neighborhoods) and its position at the European periphery, as a last outpost before the Soviet Union or Asia. Edmont Privat was one of the most prolific Swiss authors writing about the Polish capital12. This Esperantist scholar was supportive of the Polish state 10 K. Lynch, The Image of the City, Cambridge 1973. See also: “M. Certeau de et la lecture du paysage urbain: M. Certeau de, Marches dans la ville”, in: L’invention du quotidien. I Arts de faire, Paris 1994, pp. 139-163. 11 R. Frank, „Images et imaginaire dans les relations internationales depuis 1938”, Cahiers de l’IHTP 1994, (28), pp. 5-11. 12 P. Bednarz, „Szwajcarscy korespondenci wojenni w Królestwie Polskim 1914–1915”, in: Ważna obecność. Przedstawiciele państw i narodów europejskich wśród mieszkańców międzyrzecza Bugu i Pilicy w XVII-XIX wieku, eds. A. Górak, K. Latawiec, Radom 2006, pp. 277-291; P. Bednarz, “Warszawa u schyłku zaboru rosyjskiego w oczach szwajcarskiego korespondenta”, Le Temps (April 1915), Annales Universitatis Ma- riae Curie-Skłodowska - Sectio F,1998, 52/53, pp. 271-288. 235 Matthieu Gillabert before independence. During his journey, he was impressed by the multicul- turalism of the capital where inhabitants could practice a kind of ethnography toward different ethnic groups13. For Privat, “Polishness” could be found in the countryside. Indeed, Swiss authors did not consider cosmopolitan War- saw to be representative of Polish culture. This “Warsaw, the capital of Poland, this future dreamland, seems to be destined, in a not too distant future, to au- tomatically supplant Berlin in many ways.”14 These images were based on the rapid industrialization of this area and on the rise in 1918 to the status of an independent country capital city. In the Swiss liberal and anticommunist press during the interwar period, Warsaw also appeared as the last western city before the communist world. For Pierre Frederix, the French journalist who wrote in the Journal de Genève, “The Poniatowski Bridge is, at the East of Europe, the last point from where we can see the West”15. Warsaw was located on the border of the Western civiliza- tion, while travel guides and novelists like Alfred Döblin were highlighting its exotic and strange character. Swiss writer Robert de Traz wrote: “as my first day ‘flânerie’ brought me over the Vistula, where church bells were tolling at dusk, I thought I saw as far as the eye could see the steppe mixing Europe and Asia.”16 In 1945, this perception – urban dynamism, ethnic mix, peripheral situ- ation – was completely disrupted by urbicide.
Recommended publications
  • They Fought for Independent Poland
    2019 Special edition PISMO CODZIENNE Independence Day, November 11, 2019 FREE AGAIN! THEY FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND Dear Readers, The day of November 11 – the National Independence Day – is not accidentally associated with the Polish military uni- form, its symbolism and traditions. Polish soldiers on almost all World War I fronts “threw on the pyre their lives’ fate.” When the Polish occupiers were drown- ing in disasters and revolutions, white- and-red flags were fluttering on Polish streets to mark Poland’s independence. The Republic of Poland was back on the map of Europe, although this was only the beginning of the battle for its bor- ders. Józef Piłsudski in his first order to the united Polish Army shared his feeling of joy with his soldiers: “I’m taking com- mand of you, Soldiers, at the time when the heart of every Pole is beating stron- O God! Thou who from on high ger and faster, when the children of our land have seen the sun of freedom in all its Hurls thine arrows at the defenders of the nation, glory.” He never promised them any bat- We beseech Thee, through this heap of bones! tle laurels or well-merited rest, though. On the contrary – he appealed to them Let the sun shine on us, at least in death! for even greater effort in their service May the daylight shine forth from heaven’s bright portals! for Poland. And they never let him down Let us be seen - as we die! when in 1920 Poland had to defend not only its own sovereignty, but also entire Europe against flooding bolshevism.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw in Short
    WarsaW TourisT informaTion ph. (+48 22) 94 31, 474 11 42 Tourist information offices: Museums royal route 39 Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street Warsaw Central railway station Shops 54 Jerozolimskie Avenue – Main Hall Warsaw frederic Chopin airport Events 1 ˚wirki i Wigury Street – Arrival Hall Terminal 2 old Town market square Hotels 19, 21/21a Old Town Market Square (opening previewed for the second half of 2008) Praga District Restaurants 30 Okrzei Street Warsaw Editor: Tourist Routes Warsaw Tourist Office Translation: English Language Consultancy Zygmunt Nowak-Soliƒski Practical Information Cartographic Design: Tomasz Nowacki, Warsaw Uniwersity Cartographic Cathedral Photos: archives of Warsaw Tourist Office, Promotion Department of the City of Warsaw, Warsaw museums, W. Hansen, W. Kryƒski, A. Ksià˝ek, K. Naperty, W. Panów, Z. Panów, A. Witkowska, A. Czarnecka, P. Czernecki, P. Dudek, E. Gampel, P. Jab∏oƒski, K. Janiak, Warsaw A. Karpowicz, P. Multan, B. Skierkowski, P. Szaniawski Edition XVI, Warszawa, August 2008 Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport Free copy 1. ˚wirki i Wigury St., 00-906 Warszawa Airport Information, ph. (+48 22) 650 42 20 isBn: 83-89403-03-X www.lotnisko-chopina.pl, www.chopin-airport.pl Contents TourisT informaTion 2 PraCTiCal informaTion 4 fall in love wiTh warsaw 18 warsaw’s hisTory 21 rouTe no 1: 24 The Royal Route: Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street – Nowy Âwiat Street – Royal ¸azienki modern warsaw 65 Park-Palace Complex – Wilanów Park-Palace Complex warsaw neighborhood 66 rouTe no 2: 36 CulTural AttraCTions 74 The Old
    [Show full text]
  • Controversies Around the System, Organisation and Curriculum Structure of Secondary School Education in Poland, in the Years 1944–1948
    Justyna Gulczyńska DOI: 10.14746/bhw.2018.38.37 Department of Educational Studies Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Controversies Around the System, Organisation and Curriculum Structure of Secondary School Education in Poland, in the Years 1944–1948 Abstract A new form of government of the Polish state was combined with its rather intensive influence on the character of the educational system, including general secondary schools. That time is distin­ guished by numerous controversies, which then appeared in various social circles, political parties, and referred to the constitutional and organizational structure as well as the program structure of this school level. In the first years the controversies were more of an evolutionary concepts for the Polish route to socialism were still possible. After 1948 there was no more room for discussion; the decisions about this sphere were also made by one group – the people related to the communist par­ ty (Pol. abbr. PZPR). Already right after the cessation of war activities, the tendencies leading to the centralization of ed­ ucation management were noticeable, and consequently, ever more intense influence of the govern­ ment of the working classes (lub the people’s government) on the functioning of schools, but, above all, on the teaching content. The process of centralization was linked with the so-called democratiza­ tion process of school i.e., the question, of which the ruling communists made their priority. A con­ sequence of democratization of the general secondary school and rendering it a tool for the manu­ facture of future citizens – devoted to and subjected to the government of the working classes – was the aspiration for closing private general secondary school, and also the expulsion of religion from school.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno Kamiński
    Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 14 June 2016 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Pavel Kolář (EUI) - Supervisor Prof. Alexander Etkind (EUI) Prof. Anita Prażmowska (London School Of Economics) Prof. Dariusz Stola (University of Warsaw and Polish Academy of Science) © Bruno Kamiński, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I <Bruno Kamiński> certify that I am the author of the work < Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956)> I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Regionalism — Present Challenges and Threats
    Barometr regionalny tom 11 nr 2 Polish Regionalism — Present Challenges and Threats Wojciech Orłowski University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska in Lublin, Poland University of Management and Administration in Zamość, Poland Abstract After the accession of Poland to the European Union our country started to be defined as a decentral- ized state with a regional structure. The aim of this paper is to compare Polish legal solutions to the Italian and Spanish solutions regarded as classic models of regionalism. The effect of the analysis is the conclusion that the biggest obstacle for the development of regionalism in Poland is the lack of proper legal regulations including constitutional regulations. It is responsible for the fact that Polish voivodeships do not have guarantees of territorial integrity. Theoretically there is even a possibility to replace them with other units of territorial division. Other restrictions for regional development are: insufficient level of financing and the lack of formed social ties in newly formed voivodships. Due to these factors voivodships do not play their own political role. The situation could be changed as a result of an enlargement of regional competences and granting voivodships limited autonomy similarly to the situation in Italy and Spain. Introduction In foreign literature, and even in works being official documents of the European Union there is a description of Poland equally with Italy and Spain as a state with a decentralized regional struc- ture . There are opinions that the experience of some of the countries preparing for EU accession further confirms the link between European integration and the restructuring of sub-national tiers of government .
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Government-In-Exile
    Polish government-in-exile Polish government-in-exile Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) Polish government-in-exile Signing the Sikorski–Mayski Agreement. Władysław Sikorski on the le, Ivan Mayski on the right. Winston Churchill in the middle. Source: 1941, Wikimedia Commons, licencja: CC 0. Link to the lesson You will learn to indicate why the Polish government was interned in Romania; to describe how the Polish government ended up in France and England; to list the key decisions and events related to the Polish authorities in exile; to characterize the significance of the Sikorski–Mayski agreement; to explain why the Polish government‐in‐exile lost the support of the Allied powers after the war. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu On the night of 17 September 1939, the government and the commander‐in‐chief left Poland and headed for Romania. They wanted to reach France. However, as a result of pressure from various groups and authorities, the Third Reich in particular, they were interned in Romania. President Ignacy Mościcki exercised his right and appointed a successor, Władysław Raczkiewicz. The new government, with Władysław Sikorski as the prime minister, based in Paris and then Angers, set as its primary goal to side with France and England in actively opposing Germany. They started forming Polish armed units, which were supposed to join the Allied forces and restore full sovereignty of Poland within its pre‐war borders. After France had been defeated, the mission continued in Great Britain. The situation changed in the summer of 1941, when the Third Reich attacked the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem. Tom 11, Nr 1/2019
    „Krytyka Prawa”, tom 11, nr 1/2019, s. 215–237, ISSN 2080-1084, e-ISSN 2450-7938, Copyright by Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego MARIA KRUK1 100 Years of Statehood of Czechoslovakia and Poland. Similarities and Differences2 Abstract 100 years of constitutionalism of two neighbouring European states – Czechoslo- vakia, later becoming the Czech Republic, and Poland – encourage a reflection on the paths of development of their respective constitutions, on the historical stages and successive political transformations, not just in the context of individual con- stitutionalisms of each of those states but with an emphasis on the similarities and differences in this domain. And this is what this study focuses on. Starting from the common fate of rebirth of both states after WWI through the inter-war efforts to establish democratic constitutional systems and the obstacles found on the way, followed by the post-WWII period of real socialism ending with the era of trans- formations and stabilisation as democratic states of law. The text explores all the similarities found in both general aspects – like the references to the European tra- dition of parliamentary governance – and in certain specific solutions – like the dif- ferences in the concept of the two-chamber parliament. But there are also situations occurring in only one of the states, e.g. the federalisation of Czechoslovakia, the emergence of two separate states of the Czechs and Slovaks, or the differences in the course and sequence of events of democratic transformations in each of the states in the 1980s, which brings us to the conclusion that despite all the possible diffe- rences, the two constitutional systems have actually been very similar to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • A Foreign Student's Guide to Warsaw
    A FOREIGN STUDENT’S GUIDE TO WARSAW Welcome to Warsaw! I am delighted that you chose the Capital of Poland as the place for living and studying for the next few months or even years. This City has been home to many great Poles, such as Fryderyk Chopin, Maria Skłodowska-Curie and Irena Sendlerowa. Warsaw is a place where the big-city bustle and opportu- nity meshes with a homely atmosphere. This is a dynamically developing metropolis and has for years been ranked among top destinations for living and investing. Warsaw is also one of the cleanest and safest European capitals. Each year, the quality of life among Warsaw’s residents is growing as the City develops its infrastructure to make living here more and more comfortable. We have the largest scientific re- sources and the most advanced research facilities in Poland. Having creative and involved residents, Warsaw is an open, friendly and diverse city. Just like you, many people have come here to make their dreams come true. Together with those who were born here, you will be part of Warsaw now. In order to make it easier for you to make yourself at home here, we prepared this publication in cooperation with other students. It will provide you with information and advice we believe you might find useful in your everyday life here in Warsaw. Feel invited to creatively explore the City and become involved in its development! Mayor of Warsaw Rafał Trzaskowski This guide was inspired by foreign students of more than 70 universities in Warsaw. It includes information and tips to assist students who are starting their educational adventure in Warsaw in their everyday life here.
    [Show full text]
  • “What Sort of Communists Are You?” the Struggle Between Nationalism and Ideology in Poland Between 1944 and 1956
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2017 “What sort of communists are you?” The struggle between nationalism and ideology in Poland between 1944 and 1956 Jan Ryszard Kozdra Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the European History Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kozdra, J. R. (2017). “What sort of communists are you?” The struggle between nationalism and ideology in Poland between 1944 and 1956. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1955 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1955 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • The Density Dividend: Solutions for Growing and Shrinking Cities
    The Density Dividend: solutions for growing and shrinking cities Appendix Case study: Warsaw Authors: Prof Greg Clark Senior Fellow, ULI Europe Dr Tim Moonen Director of Intelligence at The Business of Cities Ltd ii The Density Dividend: solutions for growing and shrinking cities About ULI The Urban Land Institute (ULI) is a non-profit research • Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real and education organisation supported by its members. estate and land use policy to exchange best practices Founded in Chicago in 1936, the Institute now has over and serve community needs; 35,000 members in 75 countries worldwide, representing • Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s the entire spectrum of land use and real estate development membership through mentoring, dialogue, and disciplines, working in private enterprise and public problem solving; service. • Exploring issues of urbanisation, conservation, regeneration, land use, capital formation, and ULI has been active in Europe since the early 1990s and sustainable development; today has over 2,200 members across 27 countries. It has • Advancing land use policies and design practices that a particularly strong presence in the major European real respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural estate markets of the UK, Germany, France and the environments; Netherlands but is also active in emerging markets such • Sharing knowledge through education, applied as Turkey and Poland. research, publishing, and electronic media; and • Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice ULI’s mission is to provide leadership in the responsible and advisory efforts that address current and future use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE for STUDENTS Keep Calm and Read the Handbook
    GUIDE FOR STUDENTS Keep calm and read the handbook VISTULA GROUP OF UNIVERSITIES Read more at: Practical knowledge. Business approach. Global possibilities. www.vistula.edu.pl CONTENTS YOUR FIRST STEPS IN WARSAW 1. RESIDENCE PERMIT 2. MONEY 3. ACCOMMODATION 4. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, CITY BIKES, AND TAXIES 5. GET CONNECTED - MOBILE & INTERNET 6. SHOPPING • Groceries • City Malls 7. WARSAW ATTRACTIONS YOUR FIRST STEPS AT THE UNIVERSITY 1. HELPFUL INFORMATION • Wi-Fi • Student ID • Mentoring Programme • Bank holidays • Organization of the Academic Year 2. RESOURCES AND TOOLS: WHERE TO LOOK FOR INFORMATION • Intranet • Timetable • Moodle • USOS • Library 3. SCIENTIFIC AND LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE • TOEIC • TELL ME MORE • Educational materials 4. OFFICES AT THE UNIVERSITY: WHERE TO LOOK FOR HELP • Dean’s Office • Finance Office • International Office • Erasmus + Programme • Career Office • Ombudsman • Scholarships Office • Student Council • Student Activities Department 5. DEVELOP YOUR PASSIONS AND INTERESTS 6. UNIVERSITY AUTHORITIES: WE ARE HERE FOR YOU! 7. MOST USEFUL POLISH PHRASES WELCOME AT THE VISTULA GROUP OF UNIVERSITIES! It is a great pleasure to welcome you at the Vistula Group of Universities, the leader of internationalization among all Polish universities. Here Students from over 70 different countries help us create a perfect environment for teaching global entrepreneurial mindset. You probably have many questions about moving into a new country and starting your education in a new environment. This handbook has been made to answer most common questions considering first steps at the University and your stay in Poland. We understand your need for support, therefore University staff and Students will always be ready to help you. What is more, Vistula has exceptional Mentoring Program – be sure to check it.
    [Show full text]
  • May Coup D'état and Its Consequences
    May Coup d'État and its consequences May Coup d'État and its consequences Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) Bibliografia: Maria Dąbrowska, Dzienniki 1914-1965, Warszawa 2009. May Coup d'État and its consequences Ignacy Mościcki arrives at the swear-in ceremony at the Castle. Next to him: Józef Piłsudski and Kazimierz Bartel. Warsaw, June 4, 1926 Source: Leon Jarumski, 1926, domena publiczna. Link to the lesson You will learn what were the causes of J. Piłsudski’s May Coup d'État; what were the documents and photographs from this period and you will be able to characterize the course of the Coup; what were the consequences of the Coup. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu Due to the growing political crisis of the Second Polish Republic, marshal Józef Piłsudski decided to take over the power. On May 12th, 1926, Piłsudski took command of the troops gathered in Rembertów and set out for the capital. He met with president Stanisław Wojciechowski on the Poniatowski bridge. Wojciechowski probably decided not to violate the constitution and not to give in to Piłsudski’s demands to dissolve the government and hand over the power to him. On May 12th, the fights between forces faithful to the government and Józef Piłsudski’s troops began. After three days of fighting, Piłsudski’s forces won and the government resigned. On May 31st, 1926, the parliament approved members of the new cabinet, thereby sanctioning the May Coup d'État. Piłsudski, however, declined to become president, and Ignacy Mościcki was elected for the office. Exercise 1 Tell who was the head of the government overthrown by Piłsudski.
    [Show full text]