DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacred Space in Laudian England Graham Parry the Concept of Sacred Space Was Elaborated and Refined to an Unusual Degree In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacred Space in Laudian England Graham Parry the Concept of Sacred Space Was Elaborated and Refined to an Unusual Degree In SACRED SPACE IN LAUDIAN ENGLAND Graham Parry The concept of sacred space was elaborated and refined to an unusual degree in the decades before the Civil War, in the time of the Laudian ascendancy in the Church. With the rise of the High Church move- ment, associated in its early stages with bishops Lancelot Andrewes, Richard Neile and William Laud (who became Archbishop of Canter- bury in 1633), a pervasive change occurred in attitudes towards the places of worship throughout the country. In Elizabethan times, the parish church was regarded, broadly speaking, as a utilitarian place. It was where the people came together to worship God, where preaching and prayer took place regularly, where baptisms were performed, and where, several times a year, the sacrament of Holy Communion was administered. It was fitting that the church should be maintained in decent order, that is should be ‘well adorned, comely and clean kept’, as the ‘Homily for repairing and keeping clean, and comely adorning of Churches’ urged on the parishioners. But this same homily, first published in 1563, and reprinted throughout Elizabeth’s reign, gives several glimpses of the actual state of affairs prevailing in many places, where neglect and disarray were more common than decent order. ‘It is a sin and shame to see so many churches so ruinous, and so foully decayed, almost in every corner’. This widespread neglect was what caused this homily to be issued, to counteract the broad indifference to the condition of the fabric and the role of the church as the house of worship. ‘Do ye your parts, good people, to keep your churches comely and clean; suffer them not to be defiled with rain and weather, with dung of doves and owls, stares and choughs, and other filthiness, as it is foul and lamentable to behold in many places of this country. It is the house of prayer, not the house of talking, of walking, of brawl- ing, of minstrelsy, of hawks, of dogs’.1 The picture here painted of neglect and casual behaviour proba- bly presents an exaggerated scene in order to emphasise the need for 1 Certain Sermons or Homilies appointed to be read in Churches, Oxford, 1840, 244–45. 124 graham parry improvement, but there must be some truth in it. Improvement began to take a purposeful hold in the later 1610s, as a more decorous form of worship began to spread through the ecclesiastical system, promoted particularly by the prelates mentioned at the beginning of this chapter. The most significant figure for our theme was Lancelot Andrewes, for it was his example that set the tone for a more reverential mode of worship and a more elevated respect for the setting of the services of the Church. Widely admired by contemporaries for his piety as well as his learning, and for his authority in spiritual matters, he would have been a prime candidate for sainthood, had the Church of Eng- land ever decided to create its own Protestant saints. His explorations in the records of the early Church and in the writings of the Church Fathers, allied to his own natural temperament, led him to aspire to an exceptional holiness of life, and gave him a heightened reverence for the places dedicated to the service of God. Andrewes’s sensitive attitudes towards the church, the reverence that it merited, and the solemn conduct of services were reinforced by the writings of Richard Hooker, particularly the fifth book of The Lawes of Ecclesiastical Polity. There Hooker had defended the use of ceremonies in worship and fine furnishings in churches against the hostility of the Puritan movement in late Elizabethan England. Puritan zeal reached such a height that the very need for churches was called into question, as Hooker reminded his readers. They were part of the old supersti- tious and ritualistic world that should have been swept away by the Reformation. God could be worshipped anywhere by the sincere and contrite soul; the setting was of no consequence, and churches car- ried with them the lingering odour of popery. Hooker resolutely and eloquently defended the rites of the Church of England, and dilated on the benefits brought by traditional forms of worship, emphasising its continuity from Old Testament times, through the age of the early Church, and into the long centuries of the Catholic Church. ‘The very majesty and holyness of the place where God is worshipped, hath in regard of us great value, force and efficacy, for that it serveth as a sensible help to stir up devotion, and in that respect, no doubt, bet- tereth even our holiest and best actions in this kind’. He reminded his readers that sacred space was essential to right worship, and that space must be formally created and honoured by decorous furnishings and reverential behaviour. The custom of consecration, now fallen into disuse, should be revived, for ‘we know no reason wherefore Churches should be the worse, if at the first erecting of them, at the making of .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2018 "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A. Earle Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Earle, Nathaniel A., ""This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641" (2018). All Theses. 2950. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2950 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THIS COURT DOTH KEEP ALL ENGLAND IN QUIET" STAR CHAMBER AND PUBLIC EXPRESSION IN PREREVOLUTIONARY ENGLAND 1625–1641 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Nathaniel A. Earle August 2018 Accepted by: Dr. Caroline Dunn, Committee Chair Dr. Alan Grubb Dr. Lee Morrissey ABSTRACT The abrupt legislative destruction of the Court of Star Chamber in the summer of 1641 is generally understood as a reaction against the perceived abuses of prerogative government during the decade of Charles I’s personal rule. The conception of the court as an ‘extra-legal’ tribunal (or as a legitimate court that had exceeded its jurisdictional mandate) emerges from the constitutional debate about the limits of executive authority that played out over in Parliament, in the press, in the pulpit, in the courts, and on the battlefields of seventeenth-century England.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 – the Problems of the Church (C. 1580 • 1640)
    Chapter 7 – The Problems of the Church (c. 1580 • 1640) 1. Elizabethan times The first vicar to be appointed after the 1565 visitation had purged Oxford of all its Roman Catholic fellows and turned Christ Church into the most puritan college in the entire university was Alexander Horrocks.1 One side effect of the Elizabethan reforms was that they created a chronic temporary shortage of ministers who could preach, so all the colleges at both Oxford and Cambridge found it necessary to look outside their walls for incumbents. Horrocks was therefore a typical product of the time. He was a puritan but not apparently a University graduate. Horrocks soon realised that he would have to tread carefully. In the year of his arrival it was noted that someone unnamed had kept ‘monuments of superstition’, so that they would not fall victim to the iconoclasts2 and there is a tradition that the stone altar table in the North chapel is the one that graced the high altar in pre-Reformation times. The chapel also contained other elements that hinted at a residual Catholicism. As late as 1621 Roger Dodsworth noted two memorial windows there. In the east window were the figures of a man and woman kneeling. Behind the father were ten sons and behind the mother four daughters with the inscription ‘pray for William Scarbrough, armiger, and Alice, his wife and their children who have had this window made.’ John Scarbrough had been Dame Margaret Blaid’s chaplain and the family was influential in both Glusburn and Cowling. On the north side of the chapel was a window containing another family group with an inscription asking the viewer to pray for Peter Scott, (who held two thirds of the manor of Kildwick in the 1530s,) his parents, his wife and their sons and daughters.
    [Show full text]
  • By Patrick J. Mcgrath
    Andrew Marvell Newsletter | Vol. 5, No. 2 | Winter 2013 A RELIGIOUS HOUSE: MARVELL’S UPON APPLETON HOUSE, LAUDIANISM, AND EXODUS BY PATRICK J. MCGRATH In his recent edition of the poems of Andrew Marvell, Nigel Smith writes, “despite its length and its centrality in M.’s canon, Upon Appleton House has not occasioned the critical debate that surrounds M.’s most famous lyrics.”1 More and more, though, scholars are turning their attention to this complex and brilliant poem. Recent studies have focused on how Upon Appleton House (1651) responds to early modern politics, military theory, literary networks, and environmental issues.2 Scholarship on religion and Upon Appleton House has illuminated the poem’s engagement with anti-Catholic polemic, the Catholic history of the Fairfax family, and Protestant views of sacrilege.3 An account of how the poem responds to the religious upheavals of the 1630s and 40s, however, remains lacking. This essay provides such an account by showing how Upon Appleton House pursues a subtle and yet devastating critique of Archbishop William Laud (1573-1645) and the policies of High Church Anglicanism. In the end, it is the triumph over a Laudian anti-Christ that determines how Marvell depicts the controversial resignation of his patron, Thomas Fairfax, as commander- in-chief of the Parliamentary forces in 1650. Why, though, would Upon Appleton House make such extensive allusions to Laud and his innovations some six years after the Archbishop’s execution? The same question might be asked about the poem’s narration of Catholic monasticism over a century after the monasteries’ dissolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline1800 18001600
    TIMELINE1800 18001600 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 8000BCE Sharpened stone heads used as axes, spears and arrows. 7000BCE Walls in Jericho built. 6100BCE North Atlantic Ocean – Tsunami. 6000BCE Dry farming developed in Mesopotamian hills. - 4000BCE Tigris-Euphrates planes colonized. - 3000BCE Farming communities spread from south-east to northwest Europe. 5000BCE 4000BCE 3900BCE 3800BCE 3760BCE Dynastic conflicts in Upper and Lower Egypt. The first metal tools commonly used in agriculture (rakes, digging blades and ploughs) used as weapons by slaves and peasant ‘infantry’ – first mass usage of expendable foot soldiers. 3700BCE 3600BCE © PastSearch2012 - T i m e l i n e Page 1 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 3500BCE King Menes the Fighter is victorious in Nile conflicts, establishes ruling dynasties. Blast furnace used for smelting bronze used in Bohemia. Sumerian civilization developed in south-east of Tigris-Euphrates river area, Akkadian civilization developed in north-west area – continual warfare. 3400BCE 3300BCE 3200BCE 3100BCE 3000BCE Bronze Age begins in Greece and China. Egyptian military civilization developed. Composite re-curved bows being used. In Mesopotamia, helmets made of copper-arsenic bronze with padded linings. Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, first to use iron for weapons. Sage Kings in China refine use of bamboo weaponry. 2900BCE 2800BCE Sumer city-states unite for first time. 2700BCE Palestine invaded and occupied by Egyptian infantry and cavalry after Palestinian attacks on trade caravans in Sinai. 2600BCE 2500BCE Harrapan civilization developed in Indian valley. Copper, used for mace heads, found in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Sumerians make helmets, spearheads and axe blades from bronze.
    [Show full text]
  • Region and Religion
    Durham E-Theses Theatre, Catholic Communities, and Popular Entertainment in England's North-East, c.1600-1625 JAKOVAC, GASPER How to cite: JAKOVAC, GASPER (2018) Theatre, Catholic Communities, and Popular Entertainment in England's North-East, c.1600-1625 , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12668/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Theatre, Catholic Communities, and Popular Entertainment in England’s North-East, c.1600-1625 By Gašper Jakovac A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of English Studies Durham University 2018 Copyright / Declaration Declaration No material in this thesis has been previously submitted for a degree at this or any other university. Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author’s prior written consent, and information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Rule by David Howarth
    SKCM News June, 2002 THE MAGAZINE OF THE SOCIETY OF KING CHARLES THE MARTYR , AMERICAN REGION CHARLES I, ENGRAVING BY ROBERT VAN VOERST, 1636 SKCM News June, 2002 Mark A. Wuonola, Ph.D., Editor ISSN 1540-045X Table of Contents American Representative‘s Column 1 § 26 January 2002 Annual Mass & Meeting at The Church of the Transfiguration, New York City § Upcoming Annual Masses & Meetings: 1 February 2003 at Saint Paul‘s Church, K Street, Washington, D.C., 11 a.m.; 31 January 2004 at the Church of the Guardian Angels, Lantana, Florida § Celebrations of Saint Charles‘s Day, 2002 § New York Chapter Celebrates Canonisation of Saint Charles § New Goods Items § Articles in this Issue § The Anglican Society § Eikon Basilike Online § Bishop Grafton on King Charles § James R. Townsend, R.I.P. § Bismarck on King Charles (p. 35) ―The Case for Charles‖ – Sermon Preached at the XIX Annual Mass, 26 January 2002, at the Church of the Transfiguration, New York, by the Rev‘d Canon Prof. J. Robert Wright 7 King Charles I (1625-1649): England – Paper Delivered at the Church of the Advent, Boston, 30 January 2002, by Prof. William K. Tinkham 10 The Duty of Honouring the King – Sermon preached 30 January 1780 by Charles Ingliss, D.D. (Part 2, continued from December, 2001, issue) 17 The King and the Gentleman: Charles Stuart and Oliver Cromwell: 1599-1649 by Derek Wilson – reviewed by Lee Hopkins 25 Culture and Politics in Early Stuart England by Kevin Sharpe and Peter Lake (Eds.) – reviewed by Suzanne G. Bowles, Ph.D. 29 An Instance of the Fingerpost by Iain Pears – reviewed by James N.
    [Show full text]
  • 52Nd International Congress on Medieval Studies
    52nd International Congress on Medieval Studies May 11–14, 2017 Medieval Institute College of Arts and Sciences Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5432 wmich.edu/medieval 2017 i Table of Contents Welcome Letter iii Registration iv-v On-Campus Housing vi Off-Campus Accommodations vii Travel viii Driving and Parking ix Food x-xi Logistics and Amenities xii-xiii Varia xiv Mailings xv Hotel Shuttle Routes xvi Hotel Shuttle Schedules xvii Campus Shuttles xviii Motown the Musical xix Exhibits Hall xx Exhibitors xxi Guide to Acronyms xxii Plenary Lectures xxiii Mostly Medieval Theatre Festival xxiv-xxv Advance Notice—2018 Congress xxvi The Congress: How It Works xxvii Travel Awards xxviii Medieval Institute Research Centers xxix M.A. Program in Medieval Studies xxx Medieval Institute Affiliated Faculty xxxi Careers xxxii Loew Lectures in Medieval Studies xxxiii Medieval Institute Publications xxxiv-xxxv About Western Michigan University xxxvi The Otto Gründler Book Prize xxxvii Endowment and Gift Funds xxxviii 2017 Congress Schedule of Events 1–184 Index of Sponsoring Organizations 185–190 Index of Participants 191–211 Index of Honorees 212 Maps M-1 – M-9 List of Advertisers Advertising A-1 – A-42 ii Dear colleagues, It’s a rainy January evening as I write this year’s welcome to Kalamazoo, so it’s rather difficult to imagine the coming of spring. Yet I take heart—even though my office is cold—because I do know that spring will come and so too the International Congress on Medieval Studies. Some things do not change. Having said that, though, change is coming to the 52nd International Congress on Medieval Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Msdep1980 1 Ripon Index (148Kb)
    Handlist 47 APPENDIX III. PRINTED TEXTS CITED Ripon Chapter Acts Acts of Chapter of the Collegiate Church of SS. Peter and Wilfrid, Ripon AD 1452 to AD 1506; [edited by J T Fowler]. (Surtees Society volume 4). 1875 Memorials of Ripon Memorials of the Church of SS Peter and Wilfrid, Ripon; [edited by J T Fowler]. (Surtees Society, volumes 74, 78, 81, 115) 1882, 1884, 1888, 1908. INDEX Abbott, Christopher letter to, 4 September 1827 397.2 Act books 39-50 extracts from 448.2 Acts of Parliament see Parliament Adam (Sawley chapel) 356, p 57 Advocate General Opinion (1844) 21.1, 200.1 Affidavits of burials in woollen 113, 446 Affidavits of debt (Canon Fee Court) (1733-57) 327.1 (1758-1817) 335 Agarde, Arthur (1579) 370(5(f)) Aislabie, Mr. (1782) 381.2; William 389, p 90-91 Aismunderby, chapel of St John the Baptist 356, p 43-44 Easter dues (1661) 366.17 land 356, p 43-44; (1140) 370(5(b)) map of George Dawson's estates, 1619 366 property leases (1571-1636) 360.9 tenants (1461) 370(5(d)) (tithe) apportionments 400.1 tithes (1623) 366.4 Aismunderby, Lady Emma of 356, p 44 Alan 356,p29 Alan, canon 356, p 30 Alan, lord, of Aldfield 356, p 24 Alan, son of John Delat 356, p 8 Alben,Rogerof 356,p43-44 Aldbrough in Holderness tithes, 1795 425.1 Aldburgh tithes 356, p 5 Aldfield, chapel baptisms (1816-1838) 126-128 burials (1818-1839) 152-3 returns of register entries, 1839 157 chapel of St Laurence the Martyr 356, p 27-28 right of presentation to (1724-1744) 260.5 chantry chaplain 356 111 Handlist 47 pastoral supervision (3 November 1942) 278.12 Aldfield,LordAlanof
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Cathedral an Address
    DURHAM CATHEDRAL AN ADDRESS DELIVERED SEPTEMBER 24, I879. BY W I L L I A M G R E E NWELL, M.A.. D.C.L.. F.R.S.. F.S.A. THIRD EDITION. WITH PLAN AND ILLUSTRATIONS. Durham : ANDREWS & CO.. 64. SADDLER STREET. 1889. D U R H A M : THOS. CALDCLEUGH, PRINTER. 70. SADDLER STREET. TO THE MEMORY OF William of Saint Carilef THIS ATTEMPT TO ILLUSTRATE THE NOBLE CHURCH WHICH HIS GENIUS AND PIETY HAVE BEQUEATHED TO US IS DEDICATED. 53494 PREFACE. THE following account of the Cathedral Church of Durham was addressed to the members of the Berwickshire Naturalists' Club and the Durham and Northumberland Archaeological and Architectural Society, at a joint meeting of the Societies, held in the Cathedral, on September 24, 1879. This will explain the form under which it appears, and, it is to be hoped, excuse the colloquial and somewhat desultory way in which the subject is treated. It was not the intention of the author of the address, when it was given, that it should appear in any other form than that of an abstract in the Transactions of the Societies to which it was delivered. Several of his friends, however, have thought that printed in externa it might be of service as a Guide Book to the Cathedral, and supply what has been too long wanting in illustration of the Church of Durham. To this wish he has assented, but with some reluctance, feeling how inadequate is such a treatment of a subject so important. Some additional matter has been supplied in the notes which will help to make it more useful than it was in its original form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrest and Trial of Archbishop William Laud
    THE ARREST AND TRIAL OF ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM LAUD By NICHOLAS ROBERT CHARLES FORWARD A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern History School of Historical Studies College of Arts and law University of Birmingham March 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Archbishop William Laud was arrested on 18 December 1640, and specific treason charges were brought forward early in 1641. However he did not stand trial until 1644. This study aims to assess the charges; consider the reasons for the significant delay between the arrest and trial; review the law of treason pertaining at the time and how this was applied to Laud; analyse the condemnatory and often vindictive views of Laud within the public sphere as reflected in the pamphlets and newsbooks of the period; and assess in detail the trial itself. Along with Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, Laud was a principle counsellor to the king and a major hate figure for parliament who considered the two men responsible for leading the king astray during the period of the personal rule.
    [Show full text]
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1561-1642 77
    YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1561-1642 compiled by Claire Cross Borthwick List and Index 24 2000 © University of York 2000 ISBN 0-903857-92-8 ISSN 1361-3014 CONTENTS Introduction iii Abbreviations iv Alphabetical Register of Ordinands 1561-1642 1 Table of York Clergy Ordinations 1561-1642 77 Index 94 INTRODUCTION The Reformation changes of the Henrician period both greatly curtailed the number of candidates seeking ordination in the diocese of York and disrupted the registration of ordinations which in the later middle ages had been systematically recorded in the archiepiscopal registers. There are no records at all of ordinations in the diocese for the reigns of Edward VI or Mary I but soon after Elizabeth's accession from 6 July 1561 lists of ordinations reappear in the York archiepiscopal registers. Archbishop Thomas Young normally held two general ordination ceremonies each year: then, after his death in 1568, Richard Barnes, suffi agan bishop of Nottingham, introduced the practice of officiating at a number of very small special ordination ceremonies, a procedure which Archbishop Edmund Grindal and his Elizabethan successors all favoured, perhaps because it made the close examination of candidates much easier. No record remains of any ordinations conducted by Edwin Sandys, archbishop between 1576 and 1588. When the registration of ordinations begins again with Archbishop John Piers in 1589 they no longer appear in the archiepiscopal registers but solely in the Institution Act Books. The thirty-first of the Canons of 1604 ordained that following the precedent of the ancient fathers of the church sacred orders should only be conferred on the Sundays following the ember days and so put an end to the frequent special ordinations the archbishops had preferred.
    [Show full text]