DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report “Together we move South Africa forward” DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report “Together we move South Africa forward” DoD AR 2014_15 cover.indd 3 2015/09/19 02:20:05 PM DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report FY2015/16 Vote 19 “Together we move South Africa forward” The Department of Defence Annual Report is available on the DOD website (www.dod.mil.za) Annual Report Enquiries: Head of Communication: Mr S. Dlamini Tel: +27 12 355 6365 Fax: +27 12 355 0118 E-mail: [email protected] RP: 195/2016 ISBN: 978-0-621-44675-3 ii Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 defence Department: Defence REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FY2015/16 Ms N.N. Mapisa-Nqakula, MP Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Dear Minister THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FY2015/16 I have the honour of submitting to you, in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999), the Department of Defence Annual Report for the reporting period 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. (DR S.M. GULUBE) SECRETARY FOR DEFENCE: DIRECTOR-GENERAL Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 iii defence Department: Defence REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACY 7RWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHI,FRQ¿UPWKHIROORZLQJ y All information and amounts disclosed throughout the Annual Report are consistent. y The Annual Report is complete, accurate and is free from any omissions. y The Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines on the Annual Report as issued by National Treasury. y 7KH$QQXDO)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWVKDYHEHHQSUHSDUHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHPRGL¿HGFDVKVWDQGDUGDQG the relevant frameworks and guidelines issued by the National Treasury. y 7KH$FFRXQWLQJ2I¿FHULVUHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRIWKH$QQXDO)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWVDQGIRUWKH judgements made in this information. y 7KH$FFRXQWLQJ2I¿FHULVUHVSRQVLEOHIRUHVWDEOLVKLQJDQGLPSOHPHQWLQJDV\VWHPRILQWHUQDOFRQWUROWKDW has been designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the performance information, the human resources information and the Annual Financial Statements. y The external auditors are engaged to express an independent opinion on the Annual Financial Statements. y ,QP\RSLQLRQWKH$QQXDO5HSRUWIDLUO\UHÀHFWVWKHRSHUDWLRQVWKHSHUIRUPDQFHLQIRUPDWLRQWKHKXPDQ UHVRXUFHVLQIRUPDWLRQDQGWKH¿QDQFLDODIIDLUVRIWKHGHSDUWPHQWIRUWKH¿QDQFLDO\HDU )< ZKLFKHQGHGRQ 31 March 2016. Yours faithfully (DR S.M. GULUBE) SECRETARY FOR DEFENCE: DIRECTOR-GENERAL iv Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 1 Department of Defence General Information ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations/Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword by the Minister ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Strategic Statement by the Head of the Department ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction by the Chief of the South African National Defence Force .................................................................................................................. 10 Strategic Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Constitutional and Legislative Mandates ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Organisational Structure .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Information on the Ministry ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 PART B: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 23 Financial Performance Information ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 The Defence Vote ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Capital Investment, Maintenance and Asset Management Plan ...................................................................................................................... 28 Non-Financial Performance Information ............................................................................................................................................................. 35 Auditor-General’s Report on Predetermined Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 35 Strategic Outcome-Oriented Goals .................................................................................................................................................................. 35 Overview of Departmental Performance .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 Performance Information by Programme ......................................................................................................................................................... 45 PART C: GOVERNANCE ..................................................................................................................................... 97 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 99 Management Performance Assessment Tool .......................................................................................................................................................... 99 Risk Management .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102 Corruption and Fraud Prevention ............................................................................................................................................................................ 107 Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 v Code of Conduct ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108 Health, Safety and Environmental Issues ................................................................................................................................................................ 109 Portfolio Committees ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 110 SCOPA Resolutions ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 110 Internal Audit and Audit Committees ....................................................................................................................................................................... 113 Audit Committee Report .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 115 PART D: HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................... 119 Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 121 Human Resources Oversight Statistics ................................................................................................................................................................... 122 APPENDIX A: PUBLIC OPINION ...................................................................................................................... 153 PART E: FINANCIAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 161 5HSRUWE\WKH$FFRXQWLQJ2I¿FHU'U60*XOXEHIRUWKHSHULRG$SULOWR0DUFK ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Sa Navy Perspective: the Impact of Piracy on Maritime Security
    SA NAVY PERSPECTIVE: THE IMPACT OF PIRACY ON MARITIME SECURITY Rear Admiral Sagaren Pillay Chief Director Maritime Strategy South African Navy 1 GEOSTRATEGIC ORIENTATION International effort to counter piracy REC initiatives Somalia Gulf of Guinea EU – RSA EU – RSA CRIMARIO SEACOP ACIRC BRAZIL A SF MSS FRANCE SADC SF OP PHAKISA Def Review EU – RSA Marsec IBSAMAR DEFCOM NSS IORA OXIDE Marsec Staff Talks ATLASUR BRICS GOODHOPE Marsec FLOs ATLANTIC TIDINGS IBSA Marsec 2 "The sea is a vital national interest and that is why we maintain the Navy. As a nation we believe in the freedom of the seas. That is a matter of national strategic interest. We are a maritime nation trading all over the world. We accept our obligation to combine with other maritime nations to uphold the freedom of the seas and to protect our national interests through naval power.” 3 Mandate DoD Priorities SA Maritime Zones Additional Responsibilities Geostrategic Orientation Piracy Figures SANDF counter piracy Maritime Security Operations Command & Control Conclusions 4 CONSTITUTION DEFENCE ACT WP & DR MINISTERIAL/SECDEF/CSANDF GUIDELINES MILITARY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES MILITARY/ NAVY MISSIONS NAVY CAPABILITIES 5 GEOSTRATEGIC ORIENTATION International effort to counter piracy REC initiatives Somalia Gulf of Guinea EU – RSA EU – RSA CRIMARIO SEACOP ACIRC BRAZIL A SF MSS FRANCE SADC SF OP PHAKISA Def Review EU – RSA Marsec IBSAMAR DEFCOM NSS IORA OXIDE Marsec Staff Talks ATLASUR BRICS GOODHOPE Marsec FLOs ATLANTIC TIDINGS IBSA 6 Marsec 6 Defence Trade & Finance &
    [Show full text]
  • Sas Drakensberg's First 25 Years: the Life and Times of the Sa Navy's
    116 SAS DRAKENSBERG’S FIRST 25 YEARS: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE SA NAVY’S FOREMOST GREY DIPLOMAT, 1987–2012 André Wessels University of the Free State1 Abstract The South African Navy (SAN)’s first (and thus far only) purpose-built combat support ship, SAS Drakensberg, was commissioned on 11 November 1987. In this study, the ship’s first 25 years of service (1987–2012) to the SAN (and the people of South Africa) was analysed, with special reference to her role as a grey diplomat (i.e. the flag-showing cruises she undertook and her concomitant role in strengthening diplomatic and other ties with many countries). The Drakensberg’s other peace-time roles were also be reviewed, including – – humanitarian and related relief expeditions; – her role during exercises with other SAN warships as well as ships and submarines from other navies, both in South African waters and across the globe; – her role as a training ship; – ceremonial duties; and – lately also in anti-piracy patrols. Throughout the study, the Drakensberg’s activities were evaluated against the background of the changing political and other developments in South Africa, as well as internationally. In the article, it will be indicated how and why a ship that was conceived, designed and built in the apartheid era, in due course became the most prominent, most visible and most successful warship that thus far has been in SAN service. Introduction Scientia Militaria, South African November 11, 2012 marked the 25th Journal of Military Studies, Vol 41, Nr 2, 2013, pp. 116-141. anniversary of the South African Navy doi : 10.5787/41-2-1071 (SAN)’s only surviving combat support ship, SAS Drakensberg.
    [Show full text]
  • African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
    African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission August 1996 Contents Executive Summary ANC Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 1. PREFACE 2. INTRODUCTION 3. THE HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT 3.1 The prehistory of colonialism, dispossession and segregation 3.2 The history of the ANC to 1960 3.3 Just struggle in the international context 3.4 Apartheid and human rights 3.5 Apartheid human rights violations in an international context 4. THE NATIONAL PARTY, APARTHEID AND THE ANATOMY OF REPRESSION, 1948-1994 4.1 The post-1948 legislative programme of apartheid 4.2 The repressive apartheid security state, 1960-1974 4.3 The institutional violence and social consequences of apartheid 4.4 Judiciary and other forms of repression 4.5 Forced removals and forced incorporation 4.6 Mass repression by the regime in response to mass protests against apartheid 4.7 The height of apartheid repression 4.8 Apartheid and the destabilisation of Southern African countries in the 1980s 4.9 Covert action and state sanctioned gross violations of human rights in the negotiations era of the 1990s 5. PHASES OF STRUGGLE AND ANC POLICY FOUNDATIONS, 1960-1994 5.1 New forms of struggle after Sharpeville and the banning of opposition groups (1960-1969) 5.2 A changing scenario and new challenges (1969-1979) 5.3 Towards "People's War" and "People's Power" (1979-1990) 5.4 The ANC and internal revolt: The role of the Mass Democratic Movement in the 1980s 6. DID THE ANC PERPETRATE ANY GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS? 6.1 The approach, standards and conduct of the ANC in relation to human rights 6.2 Armed operations and civilian casualties 6.3 Excesses in relation to state agents 6.4 ANC members who died in exile 6.5 The Mass Democratic Movement and excesses in the mass revolt of the 1980s 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 40-1
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 40-1 30 September 2018 Protection Vessels International: Weekly Maritime Security Report in Piracy and Security News 20/09/2018 West Africa Guinea: Armed pirates board merchant vessel at Conakry anchorage - 17 September At least four armed pirates boarded an anchored merchant vessel via the anchor chain at 0300 hrs local time at an anchorage at the Port Autonome de Conakry. The master raised the alarm, locked the accommodation and crew mustered in the citadel. The robbers opened fire at the bridge windows and gained access to accommodation before ransacking crew cabins and escaping with their personal belongings. All crew were reported as safe. PGI Analysis: Violent crime is periodically reported at Conakry port and the attack comes days after a robbery and kidnap attempt targeting a vessel at Conakry anchorage on 8 September. Criminals are often undeterred by basic security measures and vessels are advised to take additional precautions in Guinean waters. Robbers typically target a crew’s personal belongings, although cargo thefts are occasionally reported. Select Maritime News Cameroon: Navy seizes weapons, mercenaries heading to Anglophone region - 13 September The navy reportedly seized three Nigerian vessels with weapons and mercenaries on board intended to support separatists in the Anglophone regions, Jeune Afrique reported. The seizure occurred on 6-7 September. The navy seized an unspecified number of Kalashnikov-style rifles, 12-gauge shotguns and ammunition. A navy spokesperson said the mercenaries planned a “large-scale” attack on 15 September. The incident marks the first reported seizure of weapons intended for the Anglophone conflict at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Navy 25 May 2009
    [For webpage] THE SOUTH AFRICAN NAVY AND ITS PREDECESSORS, 1910-2009: A CENTURY OF INTERACTION WITH COMMONWEALTH NAVIES Paper delivered at the 2009 “King-Hall” Naval History Conference on 30 July 2009 in Canberra, Australia by PROF. ANDRÉ WESSELS, M.A., D.Phil. (Department of History, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa – [email protected])1 1. INTRODUCTION Compared with major Commonwealth navies like the Royal Navy (RN) and the navies of Australia, Canada, India and Pakistan, the South African Navy (SAN) is very small. Yet its history dates back to at least 1922; and even before that, South Africans served in the RN in World War I. Proceeding from the assumption that the SAN and its predecessors played a vital role in safeguarding the strategic Cape sea-route in the interest of the Commonwealth, as well as of the Western World, the aim of this paper is to provide a brief review of the chequered history of the SAN and its predecessors, with the emphasis on interaction with Commonwealth navies. Questions that will be addressed include the following: Why did South Africa only receive its first naval force in 1922, i.e. twelve years after the establishment of the Union of South Africa? What role did South Africa’s naval forces play during World War II? To what extent was contact with Commonwealth navies limited to the RN, and why? What were the implications of the so-called “war years” (1966-1989) for the 1 The presentation of this paper at the 2009 “King-Hall” Naval History Conference was made possible by the fact that I was appointed as a Visiting Fellow in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS), University College, University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy (UNSW@ADFA), Canberra, and my trip to Australia and back to South Africa, as well as my stay in Canberra, was consequently sponsored by the UNSW@ADFA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Haul: the Evolution and Development of an Independent South African Navy Allan Du Toit
    The Long Haul: The Evolution and Development of an Independent South African Navy Allan du Toit Peu de temps après la création de l’Union de l’Afrique du Sud en 1910, une division sud-africaine de la Réserve volontaire de la marine royale a été instituée, ses membres servant dans tous les théâtres de la Première Guerre mondiale. Un petit service naval a été constitué en 1922, mais a pratiquement disparu dans les années 1930 en raison de la rigueur financière. Le déclenchement de la Seconde Guerre mondiale a relancé le service et pendant la guerre froide, la marine sud-africaine a connu une période de croissance importante, car elle a pris de plus en plus de responsabilités en matière de la protection vitale de la voie maritime du Cap. Cependant, la politique d’apartheid de l’Afrique du Sud, a rapidement conduit à l’isolement de plus en plus marqué de la marine sud-africaine, qui, tout en protégeant son propre existence, a perdu sa capacité en haute mer au milieu des années 1980. Tout cela a changé dès l’arrivée de gouvernement démocratique en 1994. L’Afrique du Sud a rétabli, une fois de plus, une flotte équilibrée, en assumant un rôle de plus en plus prépondérant en Afrique subsaharienne. Modern South Africa, with its important geostrategic position and reliance on maritime trade, owes its existence to the sea. The Cape was discovered by seaborne explorers, the first permanent European settlement established by the Dutch East India Company in 1652 had as its purpose the support of ships, and the sub-continent’s only contact with the rest of the world for the next three centuries was by sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The South African Navy and Its Predecessors, 1910–2010: a Century of Interaction with Commonwealth Navies
    Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 38, Nr 2, 2010. doi: 10.5787/38-2-92 109 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NAVY AND ITS PREDECESSORS, 1910–2010: A CENTURY OF INTERACTION WITH COMMONWEALTH NAVIES Professor André Wessels1 Department of History, University of the Free State Abstract In this article, the history of the South African Navy (SAN) and its predecessors is reviewed, as well as the interaction with other Commonwealth navies during the years 1910 to 2010. Although the Union Defence Forces were established in 1912, the Union only acquired its first naval force in 1922, when the South African Naval Service (SANS) was formed. In the meantime, the country’s naval defence was conducted by the Royal Navy (RN). During World War I, 164 members of the South African Division of the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve served in the RN. The SANS’s three small ships were withdrawn from service in 1933 to 1934, and when World War II broke out, the country’s naval forces had to be built up from scratch – but soon played an important role in patrolling the Cape sea route (and also saw action in the Mediterranean). After the war, South Africa’s naval forces were rationalised, but – in the context of the Cold War and the Soviet threat to the Cape sea route – the SAN then gradually grew in size and importance, albeit that it was (and today still is) small in comparison to major Commonwealth navies. In 1957, the SAN acquired the RN’s Simon’s Town Naval Base. Many exercises were held with the RN and other navies, but gradually South Africa became more isolated internationally because of the National Party government’s racially-based policy of apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South
    VOLUME FIVE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 Analysis of Gross Violations of Findings and Conclusions ........................ 196 Human Rights.................................................... 1 Appendix 1: Coding Frame for Gross Violations of Human Rights................................. 15 Appendix 2: Human Rights Violations Hearings.................................................................... 24 Chapter 7 Causes, Motives and Perspectives of Perpetrators................................................. 259 Chapter 2 Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights.................................................... 26 Chapter 8 Recommendations ......................................... 304 Chapter 3 Interim Report of the Amnesty Chapter 9 Committee ........................................................... 108 Reconciliation ................................................... 350 Appendix: Amnesties granted............................ 119 Minority Position submitted by Chapter 4 Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • The Former South African Government & Its Security
    Vo l u m e SIX • S e c t i o n THREE • C h ap t e r ONE The Intersection between the Work of the Human Rights Violations Committee and the Amnesty Committee THE FORMER SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT & ITS SECURITY FORCES Vo l u m e SIX S e c t i o n THREE C h ap t e r O N E The Former South African G o v e rnment and its Security F o rc e s PA RT ONE: OVERVIEW OF AMNESTY APPLICATIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY FORCES: 1 9 6 0 – 1 9 9 4 ■ INTRODUCTION 1. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (the Commission) found the state – and in particular its security agencies and affiliated policy and strategy formulation committees and councils – to be the primary perpetrators of gross violations of human rights committed during the thirty-four years it was mandated to investigate. 1 2 . Some 50 per cent of all amnesty applications received from members of the security forces related to incidents that occurred between 1985 and 1989. No applications were received in respect of incidents that occurred in the first decade of the Commission’s mandate and few applications were received for the pre-1985 and post-1990 periods. Despite this, evidence received by the Commission shows that the security forces were responsible for the commission of gross human rights violations during both of these periods. 3. Most of the applications were received from members of the Security Branch, both from Security Branch headquarters and from the nineteen regional Security Branch divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Survey
    file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM SOUTH AFRICA SURVEY 1995/96 ELIZABETH SIDIROPOULOS ANTHEA JEFFERY SHAUN MACKAY RORY GALLOCHER HERMA FORGEY CHERYL CHIPPS Research staff South African Institute of Race Relations SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS JOHANNESBURG 1996 Published by the South African Institute of Race Relations Auden House, 68 De Korte Street Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa Copyright South African Institute of Race Relations 1996 ISSN 0258-7246 PD 3/96 ISBN 0-86982-449-X Members of the media are free to reprint or report information, either in whole or in part, contained in file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post...0Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM (1 of 1167)25/11/2004 15:31:34 PM file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM this publication on the strict understanding that the South African Institute of Race Relations in acknowledged. Otherwise no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronical, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION This Survey brings in some new features. One of the most important is the ’human rights review’ contained in the chapter on Government, the Constitution, and Human Rights. Each of the main rights in the bill of rights is highlighted. We then summarise any recent legislation relevant to that particular right. Next we report any court decisions giving effect to the right in question: for example, the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty.
    [Show full text]