Sold Vol 27 No 10
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United -
African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission August 1996 Contents Executive Summary ANC Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 1. PREFACE 2. INTRODUCTION 3. THE HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT 3.1 The prehistory of colonialism, dispossession and segregation 3.2 The history of the ANC to 1960 3.3 Just struggle in the international context 3.4 Apartheid and human rights 3.5 Apartheid human rights violations in an international context 4. THE NATIONAL PARTY, APARTHEID AND THE ANATOMY OF REPRESSION, 1948-1994 4.1 The post-1948 legislative programme of apartheid 4.2 The repressive apartheid security state, 1960-1974 4.3 The institutional violence and social consequences of apartheid 4.4 Judiciary and other forms of repression 4.5 Forced removals and forced incorporation 4.6 Mass repression by the regime in response to mass protests against apartheid 4.7 The height of apartheid repression 4.8 Apartheid and the destabilisation of Southern African countries in the 1980s 4.9 Covert action and state sanctioned gross violations of human rights in the negotiations era of the 1990s 5. PHASES OF STRUGGLE AND ANC POLICY FOUNDATIONS, 1960-1994 5.1 New forms of struggle after Sharpeville and the banning of opposition groups (1960-1969) 5.2 A changing scenario and new challenges (1969-1979) 5.3 Towards "People's War" and "People's Power" (1979-1990) 5.4 The ANC and internal revolt: The role of the Mass Democratic Movement in the 1980s 6. DID THE ANC PERPETRATE ANY GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS? 6.1 The approach, standards and conduct of the ANC in relation to human rights 6.2 Armed operations and civilian casualties 6.3 Excesses in relation to state agents 6.4 ANC members who died in exile 6.5 The Mass Democratic Movement and excesses in the mass revolt of the 1980s 7. -
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 .................................................... -
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South
VOLUME FIVE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 Analysis of Gross Violations of Findings and Conclusions ........................ 196 Human Rights.................................................... 1 Appendix 1: Coding Frame for Gross Violations of Human Rights................................. 15 Appendix 2: Human Rights Violations Hearings.................................................................... 24 Chapter 7 Causes, Motives and Perspectives of Perpetrators................................................. 259 Chapter 2 Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights.................................................... 26 Chapter 8 Recommendations ......................................... 304 Chapter 3 Interim Report of the Amnesty Chapter 9 Committee ........................................................... 108 Reconciliation ................................................... 350 Appendix: Amnesties granted............................ 119 Minority Position submitted by Chapter 4 Commissioner -
The Former South African Government & Its Security
Vo l u m e SIX • S e c t i o n THREE • C h ap t e r ONE The Intersection between the Work of the Human Rights Violations Committee and the Amnesty Committee THE FORMER SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT & ITS SECURITY FORCES Vo l u m e SIX S e c t i o n THREE C h ap t e r O N E The Former South African G o v e rnment and its Security F o rc e s PA RT ONE: OVERVIEW OF AMNESTY APPLICATIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY FORCES: 1 9 6 0 – 1 9 9 4 ■ INTRODUCTION 1. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (the Commission) found the state – and in particular its security agencies and affiliated policy and strategy formulation committees and councils – to be the primary perpetrators of gross violations of human rights committed during the thirty-four years it was mandated to investigate. 1 2 . Some 50 per cent of all amnesty applications received from members of the security forces related to incidents that occurred between 1985 and 1989. No applications were received in respect of incidents that occurred in the first decade of the Commission’s mandate and few applications were received for the pre-1985 and post-1990 periods. Despite this, evidence received by the Commission shows that the security forces were responsible for the commission of gross human rights violations during both of these periods. 3. Most of the applications were received from members of the Security Branch, both from Security Branch headquarters and from the nineteen regional Security Branch divisions. -
South Africa Survey
file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM SOUTH AFRICA SURVEY 1995/96 ELIZABETH SIDIROPOULOS ANTHEA JEFFERY SHAUN MACKAY RORY GALLOCHER HERMA FORGEY CHERYL CHIPPS Research staff South African Institute of Race Relations SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS JOHANNESBURG 1996 Published by the South African Institute of Race Relations Auden House, 68 De Korte Street Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa Copyright South African Institute of Race Relations 1996 ISSN 0258-7246 PD 3/96 ISBN 0-86982-449-X Members of the media are free to reprint or report information, either in whole or in part, contained in file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post...0Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM (1 of 1167)25/11/2004 15:31:34 PM file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201995-96.HTM this publication on the strict understanding that the South African Institute of Race Relations in acknowledged. Otherwise no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronical, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION This Survey brings in some new features. One of the most important is the ’human rights review’ contained in the chapter on Government, the Constitution, and Human Rights. Each of the main rights in the bill of rights is highlighted. We then summarise any recent legislation relevant to that particular right. Next we report any court decisions giving effect to the right in question: for example, the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty. -
Annual Report
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report “Together we move South Africa forward” DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report “Together we move South Africa forward” DoD AR 2014_15 cover.indd 3 2015/09/19 02:20:05 PM DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Annual Report FY2015/16 Vote 19 “Together we move South Africa forward” The Department of Defence Annual Report is available on the DOD website (www.dod.mil.za) Annual Report Enquiries: Head of Communication: Mr S. Dlamini Tel: +27 12 355 6365 Fax: +27 12 355 0118 E-mail: [email protected] RP: 195/2016 ISBN: 978-0-621-44675-3 ii Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 defence Department: Defence REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FY2015/16 Ms N.N. Mapisa-Nqakula, MP Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Dear Minister THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FY2015/16 I have the honour of submitting to you, in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999), the Department of Defence Annual Report for the reporting period 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. (DR S.M. GULUBE) SECRETARY FOR DEFENCE: DIRECTOR-GENERAL Department of Defence – Annual Report – 2015/16 iii defence Department: Defence REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACY 7RWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHI,FRQ¿UPWKHIROORZLQJ y All information and amounts disclosed throughout the Annual Report are consistent. y The Annual Report is complete, accurate and is free from any omissions. y The Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines on the Annual Report as issued by National Treasury. -
Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector: the Case of the South African National Defence Force
COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=Research%20Output (Accessed: Date). Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector: The Case of the South African National Defence Force by Mafole Paul Mokalobe 201464081 Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor Litterarum et Philosophiae in Politics and International Relations in the Department of Politics and International Relations of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Johannesburg supervised by Professor Cheryl Hendricks 15 August 2018 Abstract Soon after democracy, South Africa embarked on elaborate process to transform its defence force. This was intentional. During apartheid, the South African Defence Force (SADF) was entwined in the National Party’s politics, blurring the line between politics and the military. After 1994, the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) and Department of Defence were established, bringing much needed changes in this regard.