Trading Africa's Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trading Africa's Future Review of African Political Economy No.112:221-225 © ROAPE Publications Ltd., 2007 Trading Africa’s Future Graham Harrison & Colin Stoneman All models of trade are normative – not only do they say something about the way trade works, they say something about how the exchange of commodities should work. This is the case even when trade models are expressed in the scientific language of orthodox economics. This issue of ROAPE is published on the bicentennial of the abolition (in Britain at least) of the trade in African people to plantation owners across the Atlantic. For those who defended this ‘triangular trade’ that contributed centrally to industrialisation in northern Europe, the case was often made with reference to the imperatives of the market and the ‘efficiency’ of the slave plantation system. Perhaps this example, more than any other in the history of European empire and the predations it has imposed on other parts of the world, demonstrates how references to market exchange to justify regimes of accumulation can serve as powerful ideological devices. And, as the slave trade flourished in the late eighteenth century, the British abolitionist movement used the transnational social relations generated by the slave trade to argue that peoples in different parts of the world shared a common moral space defined by the fact that the consumption of ‘slave sugar’ in London was an act of complicity in what one can reasonably call a global crime against humanity. Indeed, transnational capitalist trade relations have proven to have generated a diverse range of progressive political mobilisations in Britain and beyond: the ‘free’ sugar of the early 1800s, the Fair Trade movement, the boycotting of sweatshop commodities, the Anti-Apartheid Movement’s boycotting of South African goods, and so on. Trade is politics: just as capitalism is based in the social relations of the workplace, relatedly, contemporary circuits of commodities are not a result of the timeless workings of the market mechanism (however imperfect) but are premised on those very same social relations. It is very clear that now more than ever, trade is managed by (and often within) transnational corporations in an increasingly detailed fashion, commodities are massively infused with symbolisms of liberal consumer power, and the regulation of trade is strongly (but neither transparently nor straightforwardly) influenced by international business. We can discern three broad political and theoretical approaches that aim to outline a general understanding of the market and its social functions: one liberal, one nationalist, and one broadly of the Left. The Left has long held an equivocal attitude to international trade. Core economic texts of early capitalism, such as Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and David Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (which introduced the key concept of comparative advantage), opened the door (no doubt more widely than their authors would have wished) to policies of unbridled market forces in international trade. When this became the orthodoxy in the 1980s, socialist planning, and even mere economic nationalism were casualties. Yet Smith’s and Ricardo’s prime targets were not state initiatives in general but rather private monopolists who had been awarded their privileges by undemocratic monarchs. ISSN 0305-6244 Print/1740-1720 Online/07/020221-05 DOI: 10.1080/03056240701449612 222 Review of African Political Economy When in the mid-19th century Friedrich List in Germany, and a host of followers and state practitioners, attacked the simplistic application of free trade, it was not so as to restore the power of monopolists and mercantilists, but to provide governments (which might well now be democratic, or at least populist) with the power to resist the economic depredations wrought by British-enforced free trade on their less advanced economies. What India, inside the British Empire, could not do, independent Germany, France and the US could: protect their infant industries. For an initial period (which could be quite protracted in large countries like the US and later China) this could involve a reduction in international trade while the internal market was developed. Eventually it became undeniable that economic benefits for the country (though not necessarily, depending on internal politics, all classes), could be obtained by wider opening to external trade, now on the basis of a more level playing field. A focus on the ‘Imperialism of free trade’ (Lenin, 1917) and the consequences of the one-sided imposition of free trade inside colonial empires (or ‘informal empires’, as in Latin America or the middle-east) should not blind us to the beneficial, or rather the essential role, of trade in the economic development of small countries. But such trade needs to be part of a development strategy aimed at transforming the structure of the economy from one that is either peasant-based or skewed by colonial plantations or mines. Such a transformation will need to develop agriculture, but this can only be a starting point towards building a modern economy in which industry, agriculture and services all play a role. However one attempts to ‘think through’ how a more equitable and holistic trade strategy might be conceived, our foundations must be to address the multiple ways in which trade – local and global – serve to reproduce relations of exploitation and oppression: between nations, classes and genders. Trade & Development If we look at the experience of the newly industrialising countries (NICs) South Korea and Taiwan since the 1950s we note certain key elements drawn from earlier successful developers: a land reform breaking the power of a landed aristocracy (many of whom then became successful capitalists) and raising the productivity of small farmers; and state intervention that simultaneously protected the domestic market and subsidised exporters (illegitimate, according to the IMF and the World Bank – especially in combination). The root of the problem for Africa is that the West won the battle of ideas, imposing its free-trade ‘structural adjustment’ policies from 1980. This battle was won less through the intrinsic merits of economic liberalism and more through the massive redistributions of power facilitated by the accrual of international debt by most African states. By contrast in Asia, the ideology of free trade fared far less well, certainly in China, India and Vietnam, but also in South Korea and Taiwan which were given special dispensation, being in the front-line of the Cold War. All these countries protected their domestic markets and used the state to plan economic strategy (including export promotion). This was in line with the well-known ‘infant industry exception’ to free trade, admitted even by orthodox economists. When they ceased to be infants they could begin to benefit from the free market – as we are currently seeing – and not because they have reversed their earlier policies. Editorial: Trading Africa’s Future 223 By contrast, from 1980 Africa was forced to abandon planning and industrialisation and embrace the free market by the IMF, the World Bank and individual Western nations, while their economies were still in their infancy. In the 1980s Zimbabwe almost alone stood out against this trend, with semi-NIC policies which gave it growth of three times the African average, and (almost uniquely on the continent) without having to reschedule its debts. This ‘threat of a good example’ produced a suspension of programme aid from the USA and the UK, and in 1990 (despite still healthy growth) it succumbed to promises of a restoration of substantial aid (most of which failed to materialise) and liberalised. Africa was quite successful (comparable to Asia) between independence in the early 1960s and the late 1970s. Western ‘solutions’ have set it back at least 25 years. The Articles The [Fairtrade] movement’s analysis of trade – that poor countries are prevented from trading by unfair rules, tariffs and subsidies – is wrong and its suggested solutions are routinely misguided. With a few exceptions (cotton in particular), rich nations’ trade tariffs and subsidies do not significantly hurt developing-world farmers, and certainly not those in Africa. The products most African farmers grow are not subsidised heavily by Europe and the US, which concentrate their support on temperate crops such as beet and wheat (Beattie, 2007) The papers in the section on trade in this issue confront and illustrate these arguments. The opening paper by Carol Thompson and Colin Stoneman sets out the similarities and the differences – including the areas of contestation – between the two main actors in world trade, the US and the EU, which, contrary to Alan Beattie, have between them ruined many of Africa’s agricultural prospects. The case of cotton is not one to be passed over in brackets, while the ‘temperate’ crop beet, is only grown so as to produce sugar at twice the economic cost, but (thanks to subsidies) a lower price, than cane. Similar provisions apply to other crops, meats and dairy products, grown both in the North and the South, making the call for free trade hypocritical. Different considerations do indeed apply to tropical commodities that are not grown in Europe or the US, such as tea, coffee and cocoa, but this does not mean that free trade is now on the side of the African producers, as Michael Barratt Brown shows in a paper whose arguments are evaded by Beattie. Fair trade may not be a long-term substitute for free trade, but by providing some growers with the surplus that the latter denies them it enables them – and their children – the means to escape from the continuing primary-commodity dependence decreed by the market, either by using the surplus to add value and move up the value chain of their commodity, or by investing in other, more profitable, areas of enterprise.
Recommended publications
  • Constructive Engagement": U.S
    GUNTHER HELLMANN The Collapse of "Constructive Engagement": U.S. Foreign Policy in Southern Africa* 1. Introduction During the Reagan Administration, U.S. foreign policy in southern Africa acquired new significance in American politics. Political elites and subse- quently the American public were increasingly polarized as the conflicts among and within the states of southern Africa escalated. The Reagan Administration meanwhile was unable either to exercise a moderating influ- ence on the contending parties in southern Africa or to win public support with a convincing policy. In January 1987 an independent report ordered by President Reagan in September 1985 bluntly stated that the Administration's policy had failed.1 Yet initially its southern Africa policy had seemed most apt to live up to the Administration's claim to rebuild U.S. global leadership. How was it that a policy which in 1981 was regarded by nearly all sides as a coherent and reasoned whole2 could six years later be issued such a devastating judgment under the seal of the State Department? And is it valid to maintain that this policy was really "doomed to fail" from the start?3 This essay seeks to show that the Administration's policy failed in two respects. First and most fundamentally, the Administration failed to devise a coherent and effective policy transcending the tension between anti-commu- nism on the one hand and anti-apartheid on the other. This conflict of goals had been evident, though largely latent, in policy toward southern Africa since the 1970s. Second, and more important, this essay will argue that it * For their valuable and stimulating ideas I would like to extend my special thanks to the editors and, in particular, Winrich Kühne and Ambassador Donald F.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Personal Reflections on the Road to Armed Struggle
    POLITICAL organise a National Convention of representatives of all our people to Some Personal Reflections work out a new democratic, non- racial and non-sexist Constitution. © Shutterstock.com Conference further resolved that if the on the Road to Armed regime failed to call such a conference a three-day strike would commence on Struggle the 29th May, the day that apartheid South Africa was to become a Republic. The apartheid regime mobilised the army, the police and intelligence services to arrest thousands of activists and carry out a reign of terror. Mandela responded that “if the government’s response is to crush by naked force our non-violent struggle, …in my mind we are closing a chapter …on non-violent policy”. In December 1961 SA was rocked by sabotage actions by MK units in the major cities. Its manifesto declared “We of Umkhonto we Sizwe …carried out the sabotage activities to achieve liberation without bloodshed and civil clashes… Our actions are against the Nationalist’s preparations for civil war and military rule… We are working in the interests of all our people, black, brown and white, whose future and wellbeing cannot be attained without the overthrow of the Nationalists …the Military action at every stage had to be guided people’s patience is not endless. The time comes in the life of any nation and determined by the need to generate and when there only remain two choices: submit or fight. That time has now promote political action, organisation and come to South Africa.” resistance. By 1962 the leadership concluded that the sabotage campaign had not been as effective as they had expected By Aziz Pahad largely because of lack of quality equipment and training.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairtrade Certification, Labor Standards, and Labor Rights Comparative Innovations and Persistent Challenges
    LAURA T. RAYNOLDS Professor, Department of Sociology, Director, Center for Fair & Alternative Trade, Colorado State University Email: [email protected] Fairtrade Certification, Labor Standards, and Labor Rights Comparative Innovations and Persistent Challenges ABSTRACT Fairtrade International certification is the primary social certification in the agro-food sector in- tended to promote the well-being and empowerment of farmers and workers in the Global South. Although Fairtrade’s farmer program is well studied, far less is known about its labor certification. Helping fill this gap, this article provides a systematic account of Fairtrade’s labor certification system and standards and com- pares it to four other voluntary programs addressing labor conditions in global agro-export sectors. The study explains how Fairtrade International institutionalizes its equity and empowerment goals in its labor certifica- tion system and its recently revised labor standards. Drawing on critiques of compliance-based labor stand- ards programs and proposals regarding the central features of a ‘beyond compliance’ approach, the inquiry focuses on Fairtrade’s efforts to promote inclusive governance, participatory oversight, and enabling rights. I argue that Fairtrade is making important, but incomplete, advances in each domain, pursuing a ‘worker- enabling compliance’ model based on new audit report sharing, living wage, and unionization requirements and its established Premium Program. While Fairtrade pursues more robust ‘beyond compliance’ advances than competing programs, the study finds that, like other voluntary initiatives, Fairtrade faces critical challenges in implementing its standards and realizing its empowerment goals. KEYWORDS fair trade, Fairtrade International, multi-stakeholder initiatives, certification, voluntary standards, labor rights INTRODUCTION Voluntary certification systems seeking to improve social and environmental conditions in global production have recently proliferated.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Doherty, B, Davies, IA (2012), Where Now for Fair Trade, Business History
    Doherty, B, Davies, I.A. (2012), Where now for fair trade, Business History, (Forthcoming) Abstract This paper critically examines the discourse surrounding fair trade mainstreaming, and discusses the potential avenues for the future of the social movement. The authors have a unique insight into the fair trade market having a combined experience of over 30 years in practice and 15 as fair trade scholars. The paper highlights a number of benefits of mainstreaming, not least the continued growth of the global fair trade market (tipped to top $7 billion in 2012). However the paper also highlights the negative consequences of mainstreaming on the long term viability of fair trade as a credible ethical standard. Keywords: Fair trade, Mainstreaming, Fairtrade Organisations, supermarket retailers, Multinational Corporations, Co-optation, Dilution, Fair-washing. Introduction Fair trade is a social movement based on an ideology of encouraging community development in some of the most deprived areas of the world1. It coined phrases such as “working themselves out of poverty” and “trade not aid” as the mantras on which growth and public acceptance were built.2 As it matured it formalised definitions of fair trade and set up independent governance and monitoring organisations to oversee fair trade supply-chain agreements and the licensing of participants. The growth of fair trade has gone hand-in-hand with a growth in mainstream corporate involvement, with many in the movement perceiving engagement with the market mechanism as the most effective way of delivering societal change.3 However, despite some 1 limited discussion of the potential impacts of this commercial engagement4 there has been no systematic investigation of the form, structures and impacts of commercial engagement in fair trade, and what this means for the future of the social movement.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITED STATES and SOUTH AFRICA in the NIXON YEARS by Eric J. Morgan This Thesis Examines Relat
    ABSTRACT THE SIN OF OMISSION: THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA IN THE NIXON YEARS by Eric J. Morgan This thesis examines relations between the United States and South Africa during Richard Nixon’s first presidential administration. While South Africa was not crucial to Nixon’s foreign policy, the racially-divided nation offered the United States a stabile economic partner and ally against communism on the otherwise chaotic post-colonial African continent. Nixon strengthened relations with the white minority government by quietly lifting sanctions, increasing economic and cultural ties, and improving communications between Washington and Pretoria. However, while Nixon’s policy was shortsighted and hypocritical, the Afrikaner government remained suspicious, believing that the Nixon administration continued to interfere in South Africa’s domestic affairs despite its new policy relaxations. The Nixon administration concluded that change in South Africa could only be achieved through the Afrikaner government, and therefore ignored black South Africans. Nixon’s indifference strengthened apartheid and hindered liberation efforts, helping to delay black South African freedom for nearly two decades beyond his presidency. THE SIN OF OMMISSION: THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA IN THE NIXON YEARS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by Eric J. Morgan Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2003 Advisor __________________________________ (Dr. Jeffrey P. Kimball) Reader ___________________________________ (Dr. Allan M. Winkler) Reader ___________________________________ (Dr. Osaak Olumwullah) TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . iii Prologue The Wonderful Tar Baby Story . 1 Chapter One The Unmovable Monolith . 3 Chapter Two Foresight and Folly .
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Trade 1 Fair Trade
    Fair trade 1 Fair trade For other uses, see Fair trade (disambiguation). Part of the Politics series on Progressivism Ideas • Idea of Progress • Scientific progress • Social progress • Economic development • Technological change • Linear history History • Enlightenment • Industrial revolution • Modernity • Politics portal • v • t [1] • e Fair trade is an organized social movement that aims to help producers in developing countries to make better trading conditions and promote sustainability. It advocates the payment of a higher price to exporters as well as higher social and environmental standards. It focuses in particular on exports from developing countries to developed countries, most notably handicrafts, coffee, cocoa, sugar, tea, bananas, honey, cotton, wine,[2] fresh fruit, chocolate, flowers, and gold.[3] Fair Trade is a trading partnership, based on dialogue, transparency and respect that seek greater equity in international trade. It contributes to sustainable development by offering better trading conditions to, and securing the rights of, marginalized producers and workers – especially in the South. Fair Trade Organizations, backed by consumers, are engaged actively in supporting producers, awareness raising and in campaigning for changes in the rules and practice of conventional international trade.[4] There are several recognized Fairtrade certifiers, including Fairtrade International (formerly called FLO/Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International), IMO and Eco-Social. Additionally, Fair Trade USA, formerly a licensing
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Trade Books & Films Films
    Fair Trade Books & Films This list of Fair Trade books and films will help you educate yourself and your campus or community about Fair Trade principles and advocacy efforts Films • The True Cost (2015) • Summary: The True Cost is a documentary that sheds light on the unseen human and environmental impacts of the clothing industry. http://truecostmovie.com/ • Director: Andrew Morgan • Run time: 92 minutes • Available: on iTunes, VHX, Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, Blue Ray, DVD • Dukale’s Dream (2015) • Summary: Hugh Jackman and his wife travel to Ethiopia, where they meet a young coffee farmer named Dukale, who inspires them to support the fair trade movement. http://dukalesdream.com/ • Director: Josh Rothstein • Run time: 70 minutes • Available: on iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, Xfinity, Local screenings • The Dark Side of Chocolate (2010) • Summary: An investigative documentary exposing exploitative child labor in the chocolate industry. • Director: Miki Mistrati, U. Roberto Romano • Run Time: 46 minutes • Available: Free on YouTube: https://youtu.be/7Vfbv6hNeng • Food Chains (2014) • Summary: In this exposé, an intrepid group of Florida farmworkers battle to defeat the $4 trillion global supermarket industry through their ingenious Fair Food program, which partners with growers and retailers to improve working conditions for farm laborers in the United States. http://www.foodchainsfilm.com/ • Director: Sanjay Rawal • Run Time: 1 hour 26 minutes • Available: iTunes, Netflix, Amazon instant video, screening in theaters and on campuses. Fair Trade Books & Films This list of Fair Trade books and films will help you educate yourself and your campus or community about Fair Trade principles and advocacy efforts Films • Beyond Fair Trade: Doi Chaang Coffee (2011) • Summary: Global TV’s half hour special on Doi Chaang Coffee and the unique relationship with their farmers from the Akha Hill Tribe of Northern Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rollback of South Africa's Chemical and Biological Warfare
    The Rollback of South Africa’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Program Stephen Burgess and Helen Purkitt US Air Force Counterproliferation Center Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama THE ROLLBACK OF SOUTH AFRICA’S CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM by Dr. Stephen F. Burgess and Dr. Helen E. Purkitt USAF Counterproliferation Center Air War College Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama The Rollback of South Africa’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Program Dr. Stephen F. Burgess and Dr. Helen E. Purkitt April 2001 USAF Counterproliferation Center Air War College Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6427 The internet address for the USAF Counterproliferation Center is: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm . Contents Page Disclaimer.....................................................................................................i The Authors ............................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments .......................................................................................v Chronology ................................................................................................vii I. Introduction .............................................................................................1 II. The Origins of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.............3 III. Project Coast, 1981-1993....................................................................17 IV. Rollback of Project Coast, 1988-1994................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Terrorism, Volume 5, Issue
    Volume V, Issues 3-4 September 2011 PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 5, Issues 3-4 Special Double Issue on Terrorism and Political Violence in Africa Guest Editors: James J. F. Forest and Jennifer Giroux 2 September 2011 PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 5, Issues 3-4 Table of Contents: Articles Terrorism and Political Violence in Africa: Contemporary Trends in a Shifting Terrain ................................................................................................5 by James J.F. Forest and Jennifer Giroux Terrorism in Liberation Struggles: Interrogating the Engagement Tactics of the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta ........................18 by Ibaba Samuel Ibaba ‘Forcing the Horse to Drink or Making it Realise its Thirst’? Understanding the Enactment of Anti-Terrorism Legislation (ATL) in Nigeria .............................................................................................................33 by Isaac Terwase Sampson and Freedom C. Onuoha Opportunity Costs or Costly Opportunities? The Arab Spring, Osama Bin Laden, and Al-Qaeda's African Affiliates .............................................50 by Alex S. Wilner Al-Qaeda's Influence in Sub-Saharan Africa: Myths, Realities and Possibilities .....................................................................................................63 by James J.F. Forest From Theory to Practice: Exploring the Organised Crime-Terror Nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa ...................................................................................81 by Annette
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Terrorism in Africa
    DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN AFRICA: DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN AFRICA: DEFINING, ADDRESSING AND UNDERSTANDING ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN SECURITY DEFINING, ADDRESSING AND UNDERSTANDING ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN SECURITY Terrorism Studies & Research Program ISS Head Offi ce Block D, Brooklyn Court, VealVeale Street New Muckleneuk,, PrPretoria Tel: (27-12) 346 9500 Fax:Fa (27-12) 346 9570 E-mail: iss@[email protected] ISS AdAddis Ababa Offi ce FirsFirst Floor, Ki-Ab Building, Alexander Pushkin Street, Pushkin Square, Addis Ababa Tell:(: (251-1111)3) 37272-1154/5/6 Fax:(: (251-1111)3) 372 5954 E-mail: addisababa@is@ safrica.orgg ISS Cape Town Offi ce 67 Roeland Square, Drury Lane Gardens Cape Town 8001 South Africa TTel:(: (27-27 21) 46171 7211 Fax: (27-2121)4) 461 7213 E-mail: [email protected] ISS Nairobi Offi ce 5h5th Flloooor, LanddmarkPk Pllaza Argwings Kodhekek RRoad, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: (254 -20) 300 5726/8 FaxFax: (254-20) 271 2902 E-mail: [email protected] ISS Pretoria Offi ce Block C, Brooklyn Court, Veale Street New Muckleneuk, Pretoria Tel: (27-12) 346 9500 Fax: (27-12) 460 0998 Edited by Wafula Okumu and Anneli Botha E-mail: [email protected] Wafula Okumu and Anneli Botha www.issafrica.org 5 and 6 November 2007 This publication was made possible through funding provided by the ISBN 978-1-920114-80-0 Norwegian Government. In addition, general Institute funding is provided by the Governments of Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. 9 781920 114800 Terrorism Studies & Research Program As a leading African human security research institution, the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) works towards a stable and peaceful Africa characterised by sustainable development, human rights, the rule of law, democracy, collaborative security and gender mainstreaming.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Trade: Social Regulation in Global Food Markets
    Journal of Rural Studies 28 (2012) 276e287 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Rural Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jrurstud Fair Trade: Social regulation in global food markets Laura T. Raynolds* Center for Fair & Alternative Trade, Sociology Department, Clark Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States abstract Keywords: This article analyzes the theoretical and empirical parameters of social regulation in contemporary global Regulation food markets, focusing on the rapidly expanding Fair Trade initiative. Fair Trade seeks to transform Globalization North/South relations by fostering ethical consumption, producer empowerment, and certified Fair Trade commodity sales. This initiative joins an array of labor and environmental standard and certification Certification systems which are often conceptualized as “private regulations” since they depend on the voluntary participation of firms. I argue that these new institutional arrangements are better understood as “social regulations” since they operate beyond the traditional bounds of private and public (corporate and state) domains and are animated by individual and collective actors. In the case of Fair Trade, I illuminate how relational and civic values are embedded in economic practices and institutions and how new quality assessments are promoted as much by social movement groups and loosely aligned consumers and producers as they are by market forces. This initiative’s recent commercial success has deepened price competition and buyer control and eroded its traditional peasant base, yet it has simultaneously created new openings for progressive politics. The study reveals the complex and contested nature of social regulation in the global food market as movement efforts move beyond critique to institution building.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Power, Black Consciousness, and South Africa's Armed Struggle
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) Graduate Dissertations and Theses Dissertations, Theses and Capstones 6-2018 UNCOVERING HIDDEN FRONTS OF AFRICA’S LIBERATION STRUGGLE: BLACK POWER, BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS, AND SOUTH AFRICA’S ARMED STRUGGLE, 1967-1985 Toivo Tukongeni Paul Wilson Asheeke Binghamton University--SUNY, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Asheeke, Toivo Tukongeni Paul Wilson, "UNCOVERING HIDDEN FRONTS OF AFRICA’S LIBERATION STRUGGLE: BLACK POWER, BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS, AND SOUTH AFRICA’S ARMED STRUGGLE, 1967-1985" (2018). Graduate Dissertations and Theses. 78. https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/78 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations, Theses and Capstones at The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNCOVERING HIDDEN FRONTS OF AFRICA’S LIBERATION STRUGGLE: BLACK POWER, BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS, AND SOUTH AFRICA’S ARMED STRUGGLE, 1967-1985 BY TOIVO TUKONGENI PAUL WILSON ASHEEKE BA, Earlham College, 2010 MA, Binghamton University, 2014 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate School of Binghamton University State University of New
    [Show full text]