DOCSLIB.ORG

Building and Urban Development in Norway – a Selection of Current Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building and Urban Development in Norway – a Selection of Current Issues Building and Urban Development in Norway – a selection of current issues Jens Fredrik Nystad (Editor) The Norwegian State Housing Bank / Husbanken © Husbanken 2004 ISBN 82-90122-18-7 Translation by: Carol B. Eckmann and Walter Gibbs English language revision: Carol B. Eckmann Cover design: Karin Wiwe Design and layout: Brødr. Fossum AS Printed by: PDC Tangen AS Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Norway and Norwegian Society .................................................................................................... 8 The City of Oslo ............................................................................................................................... 11 Public Administration in Norway ................................................................................................. 12 Between Master and Synopsis – A Short Tale of Norwegian Planning ................................... 16 PART 2 Planning for Urban Change ................................................................................................... 20 Oslo’s Development – The Fifth Layer .......................................................................................... 22 Oslo: The Fjord City! ....................................................................................................................... 28 Road Tolls in Norway: A Transport Policy Instrument .............................................................. 34 A Holistic Method of Evaluating Sustainability ......................................................................... 38 PART 3 Regional Development and Regional Planning ............................................................. 44 Regional Development and Policy in Norway ............................................................................ 46 Regional Dynamics and Olympic Rhetoric: The Lillehammer Winter Games Ten Years On .............................................................................................................................. 50 Regional Plan for Long-term Urban Development in the Stavanger Region .......................... 54 PART 4 Housing for All? .......................................................................................................................... 58 Housing Policy Challenges in a Country with High Housing Standards and a Market-governed Housing Supply ................................................................................ 60 Housing for Young People – New Concepts and Perspectives .................................................. 66 Curbing Homelessness in Norway .................................................................................................70 Planning Based on Universal Design ............................................................................................ 74 PART 5 New Public-Private Partnerships ........................................................................................ 78 Urban Transformation – An Arena for Partnership and New Models of Cooperation .......... 80 Akerselva Environmental Park and Akerselva Innovation Park: Urban Transformation by Chance and Governance .............................................................. 84 PART 6 The Northern Dimension ......................................................................................................... 88 Woodens Towns – A Nordic Tradition ......................................................................................... 90 Climate-appropriate Construction ................................................................................................. 94 APPENDIX Institutions ................................................................................................................................... 98 Foreword 5 Building and Urban Development in Norway – a selection of current issues This publication has proving existing housing areas and the urban structure is, been prepared in con- for instance, more urgent than new building. nection with the 48th IFHP World Congress The selected topics and presentations are meant to provide in Oslo 2004. Its pur- a reasonably representative overview of the fields of plan- pose is to provide a ning and housing in Norway a few years into the new mil- general impression of lennium. We have chosen to emphasise the variety and the planning and complexity of these issues. The authors have been selected building situation in from leading circles in their respective fields, and present Norway, and describe here their personal views on the issues. As always there are some of the impor- more questions than answers, and there is a need for ongo- tant challenges facing ing refinement of the instruments of analysis and imple- us in the first years of mentation. The tools that we choose and the results that we the 21st century. In produce will profoundly influence the daily lives of a large it, we present part of our increasingly urban population. The ever- descriptions and increasing possibilities of new technology, especially analysis of issues within communications, and the shift of resources that this confronting local and central authorities, property develop- requires will in itself change the everyday life of a large ers and the building industry, as well as the planning com- proportion of the population. munity and the public in general. Instead of trying to cover the whole of this vast field, we The challenges facing Norwegian planning and housing have selected specific topics and questions that we feel will policies have changed over the last few years. One of our be of international interest – and that seem to be generally most important challenges involves finding good, innova- acknowledged as key issues within planning and building. tive approaches to improve cooperation at the local level, There is a continual need to exchange ideas and experi- be it between various levels of government or between pri- ences across national boundaries. It is our hope that this vate and public partners. Another is in the realm of hous- publication will serve as a brief introduction to “the state- ing consumption. Norway has gradually developed a very of-the-art” of some of the topics currently under discussion high standard of housing. At present Norwegians (together in Norway, and dealt with during the congress. with Icelanders) are the world’s largest consumers of hous- ing in terms of area per person. This represents one aspect of the growing environmental challenge that we currently Erna Solberg face on the local, national and global levels. Quality has Minister of Local Government now become more important to us than quantity. Im- and Regional Development Introduction Norway is a modern welfare state. The Norwegian economy is generally characterised as a mixed economy – a market economy with a clear component of state influence. Since the 1970s, the off-shore oil industry has played a dominant role in the Norwegian economy. The politico- administrative system in Norway has three levels; national, regional and municipal. The Norwegian Planning and Building Act institutes a two-tier planning system of county plans and municipal master plans under the control of the elected county and municipal councils, respectively. (Photo: Helge Sunde/Samfoto) 8 Norway and Norwegian Society is roughly the same as that of Great Britain, Italy or Japan. Large areas of Norway consist of forest Tromso and mountains. All along the western coast Russia deep fjords, surrounded by mountains and glaciers, penetrate into the heart of the country. Given Norway’s extreme northern posi- tion, its mainland climate is surprisingly mild. This is due to the Gulf Stream, which brings relatively warm and moist air to coastal areas and ensures ice-free harbours Sweden even in winter. The coastal climate is one of Trondheim mild winters, cool summers and heavy pre- Finland cipitation year-round, while inland areas Norway are drier with colder winters and warmer summers. Bergen OSLO Stavanger The political system Estonia In formal terms, Norway is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democratic system of governance. Both democratic governance and the Denmark Latvia monarchy were established in the Constitu- tion of 1814, still in effect today. Parliamen- Lithuania tarianism was introduced in 1884. The King has little real political power, but fills an important symbolic function as the Head of Germany Belarus State and official representative of Norwe- Poland gian society and industry. State power is formally distributed between three institutions: the Storting (the legislative power), the Government (the exec- Geography and climate utive power) and the courts (the judicial power). In some circles, the public adminis- Norway stretches farther north than any tration, which was designed to serve the other European country except Russia. It is needs of the political bodies, is viewed as a long and narrow, extending almost 1 750 km fourth state power, as it now takes indepen- from north to south. If it were possible to dent action and can exert influence on the swing Norway 180° by its most southernly shaping of policies. There is also a geographi- point, it would reach all the way to the cal distribution of political power into state, Mediterranean. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Retail Flagship, Boutique, Fine Dining Bars & Restaurant
    RETAIL FLAGSHIP, BOUTIQUE, FINE DINING BARS & RESTAURANT CONTENTS Introduction 1 The concept 3 Norway’s capital city 7 An exclusive destination 14 Floor plans 17 Contact 35 1 INSPIRED BY THE PAST, REDESIGNED FOR THE FUTURE In the heart of one of Europe’s fastest growing cities lies a building magnificent in scale, design and historical significance. This is Oslo’s Telegrafen, a grand landmark restaurants and is steps away from some of building that has been an architectural icon Oslo’s most prestigious downtown shopping in the city’s streetscape for almost a century. areas, including Karl Johans gate, Nedre Looking to the future, the building is now Slottsgate and Øvre Slottsgate. undergoing a dramatic renaissance. Inspired by its past life as the centre of Norway’s With its monumental scale, luxurious telecommunications and radio industries, interiors and clever blend of heritage and Telegrafen is being transformed into a vibrant modernity, this is truly a signature business office, entertainment and retail destination address for today’s established companies for the modern age. and tomorrow’s entrepreneurs. The property is located in the heart of downtown Oslo, in Kvadraturen, the city’s oldest and most historic neighbourhood. Boasting a unique character, the area is popular amongst high-end retailers and 2 Computer-generated image of the exterior. 3 01 THE CONCEPT In the heart of one of Europe’s fastest growing cities lies a building magnificent in scale, design and historical significance. 4 A PLACE TO SHARE, ENJOY AND CONNECT The elegant lifestyle environment seamlessly integrates with the public grand hall and its inspiring retail, restaurant and bar offerings.
    [Show full text]
  • Utdanningsplan for Leger I Spesialisering I Nyresykdommer Ved Sørlandet Sykehus
    Utdanningsplan for leger i spesialisering i nyresykdommer ved Sørlandet Sykehus Om utdanningsvirksomheten Sørlandet sykehus er Agders største kompetansebedrift, med over 7000 ansatte fordelt på ulike lokasjoner. SSHF har ansvar for spesialisthelsetjenester innen fysisk og psykisk helse og avhengighetsbehandling. Sykehusene ligger i Arendal, Kristiansand og Flekkefjord. I tillegg har vi distriktspsykiatriske sentre og poliklinikker flere andre steder i Agder. I fjor var det over 550 000 pasientbehandlinger i Sørlandet sykehus. Om organisering av spesialiteten Nyremedisinsk virksomhet er organisert som seksjoner i medisinsk avdeling både i Arendal og Kristiansand. Ved begge avdelinger er det egen dialyseavdeling. Det behandles også mange nyrepasienter i Flekkefjord i den generelle indremedisinske avdelingen der som også har egen dialyseavdeling. Ved behov for nyremedisinsk kompetanse konsulteres nyrelegene i Kristiansand eller pasientene overflyttes dit. De nyremedisinske pasientene håndteres poliklinisk av nyremedisinerne i Kristiansand som også besøker dialysen i Flekkefjord 1 gang pr mnd. Generelle indremedisinske læringsmål i del 2 indremedisin dekkes alle tre steder, men de fleste læringsmålene i del 3 nyremedisin må dekkes i Arendal eller Kristiansand. LIS 3 i nyremedisin ved SSHF skal rotere i 6 mnd til Ullevål eller AHUS og 3 mnd til Rikshospitalet for å nå læringsmål i transplantasjonsmedisin. Om avdelingen/seksjonen i SSHF Medisinsk avdeling ligger under somatisk klinikk delt ved tre lokalisasjoner, Flekkefjord, Arendal og Kristiansand. Det er egne nyremedisinske seksjoner i Arendal og Kristiansand, mens i Flekkefjord ligger nyrepasientene i generell medisinsk avdeling ved innleggelse. Nyreseksjonen i Arendal har 6 senger som deles mellom hema/endo/nefro. Det er 3 overleger i nyremedisin som jobber ved avdelingen. Nyreseksjonen i Kristiansand har 4 senger.
    [Show full text]
  • Årsrapport 2019 Årsberetning
    Respekt, faglig dyktighet, tilgjengelighet og engasjement Flekkefjord Kristiansand Arendal Årsrapport 201 20149 Sørlandet sykehus HF - trygghet når du trenger det mest Innholdsfortegnelse Årsberetning 3 Resultatregnskap 13 Balanse 14 Kontantstrømoppstilling 15 Noter 16 Revisors beretning 32 2 Sørlandet sykehus HF Årsrapport 2019 Årsberetning Dette er Sørlandet sykehus gevinstrealisering i prosjektene. Bedre kvalitet i Sørlandet sykehus HF (SSHF) eies av det regionale pasientbehandlingen skal sikres gjennom arbeid med helseforetaket Helse Sør-Øst RHF. SSHF leverer helhetlige pasientforløp gjennom alle tjenesteledd. spesialisthelsetjenester til i overkant av 300 000 Arbeidet skal være kunnskapsbasert, og inkludere mennesker i sykehusområdet. Agder er primært forpliktende samhandling basert på avtaler med opptaksområde. I tillegg har SSHF regionale og kommunehelsetjenesten. nasjonale funksjoner. Programmet startet 01.03.2019 og det er satt i gang en SSHFs lovpålagte oppgaver er pasientbehandling, rekke prosjekter som følges opp fra programkontoret. forskning, utdanning av helsepersonell samt opplæring av pasienter og pårørende. Ansvarsområdene omfatter Hovedmål somatikk, psykisk helsevern, tverrfaglig spesialisert SSHF skal gi befolkningen i Agder tilgang til spesialist- rusbehandling, spesialisert rehabilitering, prehospitale helsetjenester slik dette er fastsatt i lover og forskrifter. tjenester og pasientreiser. SSHF skal innrette sin virksomhet med sikte på å nå følgende hovedmål gitt av Helse Sør-Øst RHF i Oppdrag SSHF har somatiske sykehus i Arendal, Kristiansand og bestilling 2019: og Flekkefjord. Psykiatrisk sykehusavdeling er lokalisert i Arendal og Kristiansand. Distrikts- 1. Redusere unødvendig venting og variasjon i psykiatriske og barne- og ungdomspsykiatriske enheter kapasitetsutnyttelsen ligger i kommunene Kristiansand, Mandal, Kvinesdal, 2. Prioritere psykisk helsevern og tverrfaglig Farsund, Flekkefjord, Arendal, Lillesand, Grimstad og spesialisert rusbehandling Tvedestrand. Det er polikliniske og døgnbaserte enheter innen rusbehandling i begge 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Kollektivtransport Og Transportpolitikk
    Transportpolitikken som premissgiver for byutviklingen i Osloregionens sentrale del Gustav Nielsen Byutviklingens lange linjer i Osloregionen BULL-seminar 25.-26. april 2016 Gustav [email protected] – 25.04. 2016 Nielsen Hovedpunkter – utplukk fra et stort emne Opprinnelig plan: 1. Lange linjer – byveksten og reiseomfanget 2. Kollektivtransporten som virkemiddel for Oslos utvikling 3. Bilen og veiløsningenes møte med byen 4. Transportomlegginger med nye muligheter for byutvikling 5. Noen refleksjoner Dette var for ambisiøst – De sorte emnene må vi diskutere en annen gang. Og «refleksjonspunktet» blir svært kort. Gustav Nielsen Lange linjer Fortidens valg og løsninger gir mange føringer på fremtiden. Det kan ta 100 år fra idé til gjennomføring. Her er noen tall om byens vekst og transportens revolusjon. Gustav Nielsen Folketall i Oslo og Akershus, 1920 - 2016 1 300 000 1 200 000 1 100 000 1 000 000 900 000 800 000 Øvre Romerike 700 000 Nedre Romerike Follo 600 000 Asker& Bærum Oslo ytre sone 500 000 Oslo indre sone 400 000 300 000 200 000 100 000 0 1920 1930 1946 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 Gustav Nielsen Årlig endring i folketall i ulike deler av regionen Gustav Nielsen Persontransport-revolusjonen i Norge 1914-2014 Gustav Nielsen Individuell transport: Først sykkel, så personbil Gustav Drammensveien, 1943 Nielsen Individuell transport: først sykkel, så personbil Gustav Nielsen Forsinket bilisme – inntil 1960 Registrerte personbiler per 1000 innbygger Gustav Nielsen Jernbane og buss taper mot bilen; og «sultefores» Millioner passasjerkm per år 1927-2003 Gustav Nielsen Bilen og flyet tar over – buss og bane taper Gustav Nielsen Godstransport – trussel og mulighet Gustav Nielsen Kollektivtransporten som virkemiddel for Oslos utvikling Kollektivtransport har bygget byen – og kan fortsatt gjøre det Men det har vært, og er stadig, mange motkrefter Gustav Nielsen Kristiania «tok» Aker med kollektivtransport (1910-51) Gustav Nielsen Jernbanen bygget landet og byen 1854-1940 Styrket Oslos omland og stimulerte villabebyggelse nær stasjonene.
    [Show full text]
  • Lillehammer Olympic Park
    LILLEHAMMER OLYMPIC PARK Olympic City: Lillehammer Country: Norway Edition of the Games: 1994 Winter Olympic Games Preliminary remarks As you may have seen, two governance cases are dedicated to Lillehammer. Reasons that support this choice are twofold. First, Lillehammer hosted two editions of the Games. If the latter built upon the former to deliver great Games, it also produced its own legacy and consequently, structures to deal with it. Second, as legacy is about both venues and facilities at one side and education, knowledge transfer and experience sharing at the other side, two different cases were necessary to encompass various ways Lillehammer manages its Olympic legacy(ies). Inherited from the 1994 Games, the Lillehammer Olympic Park is a structure run by the municipality of Lillehammer that takes care of the majority of Olympic venues and events. The Lillehammer Olympic Legacy Sports Centre is an emanation of the Norwegian Sports Federation and Olympic and Paralympic Committee and is a direct legacy of the YOG. Obviously, many bridges and crossovers exist between these structures and collaboration and common understanding are key. The big picture also encloses the Norwegian Top Sports Centre of the Innland region dedicated to elite athletes (Olympiatoppen Innlandet), the University, the Olympic Legacy Studies Centre as well as the remaining Olympic venues run by other municipalities or private companies. With all these partners involved in managing Lillehammer’s Olympic legacy, clusters (venues, events, training, research, etc.) facilitate organisation and legacy management. Toolkit: Keeping the Flame Alive – Lillehammer Olympic Park 1 World Union of Olympic Cities 2019 HOW LEGACY GOVERNANCE STARTED IN LILLEHAMMER Since 1990 Lillehammer & Oppland https://www.olympiaparken.no/en/ • • • WHEN WHERE WEB ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… “The XVII Winter Olympics did not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Studies in Risk Management Norway
    OECD Studies in Risk Management OECD Studies Norway in Risk Management TUNNEL SAFETY Looking back on the disasters of recent years alone (the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster, Hurricane Katrina, terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London, avian flu, the 2003 heat wave in Europe), one could Norway be forgiven for thinking that we live in an increasingly dangerous world. A variety of forces are helping to shape the risks that affect us, from demographic evolutions to climate change, through the development TUNNEL SAFETY of mega-cities and the rise of information technology. These changes are clearly a major challenge for risk management systems in OECD countries, which have occasionally proved unable to protect the life and welfare of citizens or the continuity of economic activity. The OECD Futures Project on Risk Management Policies was launched in 2003 in order to assist OECD countries in identifying the challenges of managing risks in the 21st century, and help them reflect on how best to address those challenges. The focus is on the consistency of risk management policies and on their ability to deal with the challenges, present and future, created by systemic risks. The Project covers a range of risk management issues which were proposed by the participating countries and together form three thematic clusters: natural disasters, risks to critical infrastructures, and the protection of vulnerable population groups. In the first phase of the Project, the OECD Secretariat prepared a case study for each issue. The studies cover both recent international developments of interest and the national policy context, and come with a tool for self-assessment to be used later in the Project in order to review the national policies in question.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Agder Kommunesammenslåing
    Veien til færre og større Agder-kommuner Her er oversikt over status på prosessene SIRDAL: Ønsker primært å stå alene. Er også involvert i VEST-AGDER rundt kommunesammenslåing i alle mulighetsstudiet «Langfjella» (Sirdal, Valle, Bykle, Vinje, og Bygland), men har satt det på vent. 180 877 innbyggere AUST-AGDER kommunene i Agder-fylkene. ÅSERAL: Kommunestyret vedtok 25. juni med 9 mot 8 stemmer å stå alene. Alternativene er 114 767 innbyggere «Midtre Agder» og «Indre Agder» (Åseral, Bygland, Evje og Hornnes) Saken skal opp 1838 BYKLE 933 ÅMLI: SIRDAL Kommunestyret takket igjen 3. september, og det skal holdes BYKLE: rådgivende folkeavstemning 14. september. Kommunestyret vedtok 25. juni å 18. juni ja til videre UTSNITT utrede «nullalternativet». De vil sonderinger med også utrede sammenslåing med Froland. Takket også ja KVINESDAL: til sonderinger med ÅSERAL 925 Valle og Bygland i «Setesdal»- Foreløpig uklar situasjon, sak framlegges for alternativet, og ønsker drøftinger Nissedal i Telemark. formannskapet 1. september. Opprinnelig om aktuelle samarbeidsområder med i «Lister 5» som har strandet, «Lister 3» med Vinje og Sirdal. vil muligens bli vurdert. Men ønsker også VEGÅRSHEI: GJERSTAD: RISØR: 5948 Sirdal med på laget. KVINESDAL VALLE 1251 Kommunestyret vedtok Ønsker å gå videre med Bystyret oppfordret 28. mai de 16. juni at de er best «Østregionen» (Gjerstad, fire kommunene i «Østregionen» VALLE: tjent med å stå alene, Vegårdshei, Tvedestrand å utrede sammenslåing. HÆGEBOSTAD: Formannskapet vedtok 24. juni å Kommunestyret sa 18. juni ja til å forhandle både men vil også vurdere og Risør). Vurderer også Arbeidet med Østre Agder går utrede «nullaltenativet», altså å stå «Østre Agder» og om Åmli bør være med, parallelt, og kommunestyret om «Midtre Agder» (Marnardal, Audnedal, alene.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Oslo March 2011 Workshop Final Dec 2011X
    CATCH MR Oslo / Akershus Workshop - Documentation The 5th workshop for Catch MR Interreg IV C was held in Oslo and Akershus at 7-9 March 2011. The main themes of the workshop were Parking Policy, Road User Charging, Financing Public Transport and Public Transport Priorities. 1 30.12.2011 2 Contents 1 General .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Programme Oslo and Akershus Workshop 7-9.March 2011.................................... 5 1.3 Participants ............................................................................................................. 7 2 Welcome speeches...................................................................................................... 11 3 Workshop working groups - General ............................................................................ 12 4 Parking Policy .............................................................................................................. 13 4.1.1 Presentation of good practice, Gothenburg Region ........................................ 13 4.1.2 Group discussions.......................................................................................... 15 5 Road User Charging..................................................................................................... 16 5.1.1 Road user charging among Catch-MR partners ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navnetabell Adresseparseller
    Saltdal kommune Adresseprosjektet NAVNESAK: VEG- OG OMRÅDENAVN 1840 Saltdal Adresse- Kartblad Objekttype/ Anbefalt Vedtatt parsell Sted skrivemåte Skrivemåte Nr. 1 18 Hytteområde Grytvik- Grytvikvatnet vatnet Grytvikvatnet Setså nordre 3 18 Hytteområde Valvatnet Vallvatnet Vallvatnet Setså nordre 5 18 Nerveien Nerveien Setså nordre 6 21 Gårdsveg Moan Nye innspill Sommarvoll Bernhoff Hansens 5 og 6 Innmark Bernhoff H vei Setså nordre Harald ska 9 21 Område Skjærvik/ Skjærvikhaugen Opprettet navnesak Utvidet. Hytteområde Skjervik- Skjærvikhågen Blir vedtatt senere Stamnes hågen 10 21 Gårdsveg Lunnevegen Fra E6 Gårdsveien Lunneveien Langset 12 24 Gårdsveg Kvernstein Fra parsell 14 veien Kvernstein- Saksenvik vestre veien 13 24 Gårdsveg Sjyveien Fra parsell 14 Sjyveien Saksenvik østre Saltdal kommune Adresseprosjektet NAVNESAK: VEG- OG OMRÅDENAVN Adresse- Kartblad Objekttype Anbefalt Forslag fra parsell Sted skrivemåte kommunens Nr. Enhet PLUT 14 24 Komm./privat veg Soksenvik/ Soksenvika/ Opprettet navnesak Botn-Kinesodden Saksenvika- Saksenvik- Blir vedtatt senere Botn og Saksenvik veien veien 15B 24 Gårdsveg Botnveien Fra parsell 15A Botnveien Botn 16 23 Fylkesveg 515 Fiskvåg Rognan- veien Fiskvågveien Nerauran 20 20 Boligveg Savoyveien Endret Fra Fv 515 Halsåsveien Savoyveien Halsmoen Åsen 22 20 Gårdsveg Kalmoveien Endret Bakkemo Bakkemoveien Bakkemoveien Halsmoen 24 20 Område med fri- Skipmann- Skipmannvikveien Opprettet navnesak Endret. boliger ved vikveien Skipmannvika Blir vedtatt senere Område. Skipmannvik- Skipmann- Skipmannviksjø sjøen vika veien 25 19/20 Komm. veg Fra Fv 515 i Vik Breimo- Breimoveien til Breimo veien 26 19 Hytteområde Kvannto- Endret Kvantohamran hamran Kvanntohamran Område. Vikfjell Vikfjellveien Saltdal kommune Adresseprosjektet NAVNESAK: VEG- OG OMRÅDENAVN Adresse- Kartblad Objekttype Anbefalt Forslag fra parsell Sted skrivemåte kommunens Nr. Enhet PLUT 27 23 Fv 516 Endret.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary File for the Paper COVID-19 Among Bartenders And
    Supplementary file for the paper COVID-19 among bartenders and waiters before and after pub lockdown By Methi et al., 2021 Supplementary Table A: Overview of local restrictions p. 2-3 Supplementary Figure A: Estimated rates of confirmed COVID-19 for bartenders p. 4 Supplementary Figure B: Estimated rates of confirmed COVID-19 for waiters p. 4 1 Supplementary Table A: Overview of local restrictions by municipality, type of restriction (1 = no local restrictions; 2 = partial ban; 3 = full ban) and week of implementation. Municipalities with no ban (1) was randomly assigned a hypothetical week of implementation (in parentheses) to allow us to use them as a comparison group. Municipality Restriction type Week Aremark 1 (46) Asker 3 46 Aurskog-Høland 2 46 Bergen 2 45 Bærum 3 46 Drammen 3 46 Eidsvoll 1 (46) Enebakk 3 46 Flesberg 1 (46) Flå 1 (49) Fredrikstad 2 49 Frogn 2 46 Gjerdrum 1 (46) Gol 1 (46) Halden 1 (46) Hemsedal 1 (52) Hol 2 52 Hole 1 (46) Hurdal 1 (46) Hvaler 2 49 Indre Østfold 1 (46) Jevnaker1 2 46 Kongsberg 3 52 Kristiansand 1 (46) Krødsherad 1 (46) Lier 2 46 Lillestrøm 3 46 Lunner 2 46 Lørenskog 3 46 Marker 1 (45) Modum 2 46 Moss 3 49 Nannestad 1 (49) Nes 1 (46) Nesbyen 1 (49) Nesodden 1 (52) Nittedal 2 46 Nordre Follo2 3 46 Nore og Uvdal 1 (49) 2 Oslo 3 46 Rakkestad 1 (46) Ringerike 3 52 Rollag 1 (52) Rælingen 3 46 Råde 1 (46) Sarpsborg 2 49 Sigdal3 2 46 Skiptvet 1 (51) Stavanger 1 (46) Trondheim 2 52 Ullensaker 1 (52) Vestby 1 (46) Våler 1 (46) Øvre Eiker 2 51 Ål 1 (46) Ås 2 46 Note: The random assignment was conducted so that the share of municipalities with ban ( 2 and 3) within each implementation weeks was similar to the share of municipalities without ban (1) within the same (actual) implementation weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biologisk Mangfold I Nesodden Kommune Harald Bratli
    Biologisk mangfold i Nesodden kommune Harald Bratli NIJOS rapport 3/03 Biologisk mangfold i Nesodden kommune Biologisk mangfold i Nesodden kommune Harald Bratli Norsk institutt for jord- og skogkartlegging, Ås 2003 NIJOS rapport 03/2003 ISBN: 82-7464-306-2 NIJOS rapport 03/2003 Biologisk mangfold i Nesodden kommune Tittel: Biologisk mangfold i Nesodden kommune NIJOS nummer: 03/2003 Forfatter: Harald Bratli ISBN nummer: 82-7464-306-2 Oppdragsgiver: Nesodden kommune Dato: 06.03.2003 Fagområde: Biologisk mangfold Sidetall: 81 Utdrag: Kartlegging av biologisk mangfold er foretatt i Nesodden kommune. Til sammen 107 lokaliteter er kartfestet og beskrevet, fordelt på 12 ulike naturtyper. Flest lokaliteter ble registrert i naturtypene dammer, rik edelløvskog og kalkrike enger Lokalitetenes naturverdi er vurdert. Til sammen 31 lokaliteter er gitt verdien svært viktig, 33 er rangert som viktige, mens 43 har lokal verdi. En høy andel dammer ble vurdert som svært viktige. En oversikt over kjente forekomster med truede og sjeldne arter er også gitt. Abstract: In the present study a survey of important areas for biodiversity have been performed in the municipality Nesodden, southern Norway. A total of 107 localities were recorded in 12 different habitat types. Most of them were found in ponds and in the cultural landscape, but also deciduous forest are important. The localities were assigned a value as nationally important (31 localities), regionally important (33 localities) and locally important (43 localities). Among the nationally important localities most were ponds. A list of nationally red-listed species occurring in the area is also given. Andre NIJOS publikasjoner fra prosjektet: Emneord: Keywords: Ansvarlig underskrift: Pris kr.: Kartlegging av Biodiversity survey kr.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]