The Armored Scale Insects of California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Armored Scale Insects of California QREGQN BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 5 THE ARMORED SCALE INSECTS OF CALIFORNIA BY HOWARD L. McKENZIE (State of California Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1956 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. LINSLEY,S. B. FREEBORN,R. L. USINGER Volume 5, pp. 1-210, plates 1-3, 183 figures in text Submitted by Editors April 4, 1955 Issued, August go, 1956 Price, Cloth, $6.00; Paper, $4.50 University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles California Cambridge University Press London, England COPYRIGHT, 1956 BY ?ITIF. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Printed by Offset in the United States of America LIST OF COLORED PHOTOGRAPHS Many of the specimens used to produce the accompany- PLATE 2 ing colored photographs were collected by various indi- Aonidomytilits ccanothi Ferris, Larson Valley, El Dorado Co., De- viduals at my request. For those who participated in cember 27. 1954, on Ceaiiothus iiitegerrititus (L. Mobley). this project acknowledgments are here made. Aulacaspis rosae (BouchC), Sacramento, May 28, 19.54, on XU~US With the exception of the colored photograph of sp. (mammoth blackberry) (H. H. KeiCer). Hall scale, Nilotuspis hulli (Green) which has been en- Crrrulaspis visci (Schrank), Sacramento, May 26, 19.54, ott Juni- larged three diameters (xs), the remainder have been perus sp. (juniper) (H. L. McKenzie). photographed actual size on the infested plant part. Dinspis broineliae (Kerner), San Diego, February 23. 11)5i, on Bromeliad (G. Hill and R. .I. Buckner). It is hoped these colored photographs will help in identilying a few of our more common California tli- Dia.spis erIii?iorncti (BouchC). Norco, Riversidc Co., June 18, I 95 1. on Oproztia hatniltotrine (czictus) (R. M. Hawlhorne antl H. I.. aspidids as they are seen in the field. McKenzie). 1 2 Plate and the top row of plate include those di- Diuspis via?tznnitae (Wliitney), Magalia, Butte Co., October 30, aspidids beIonging to the tribe Aspidiotini; the remain- 1939,on Arctostaphylos SI). (riianzanita) (H. H. Keifer). der are referable to the tribe Diaspidini. The species Quadmspidiotus juglans-regiae (Comstock), Greenspot, San Ber- have not been arranged chronologically under each nardino Co., June 27, 1955, on Jirglaiis sp. (walnut) (G. M. tribe, but instead are assembled more for the purpose Harper). of eye appeal and beauty. Qctadrspidiottcs perrticiosrcs (Comstock), San I,eanclro, Alameda Co., May 26, 1954. on Priows sp. (plum) (E. K. Strobridge). The following list includes specific collection data Tor each photograph: Sv/ctu@idccs nlbtrs McKetiiie, Sorco, Riversitlc Co.. June 28, I yj 1. on Euplmrbin sub,narir/~rilla,-is(siiccrilent) (K. M. H;iwlttorttc ;tnd H. L. McKenrie). PLATE 1 .~lortid.iellnaicwatztii (Maskell), Poniona. Los Angeles Co., Deceni- PLATE 3 ber 26, 1953, on Citrus /inion (lemon) (H. L. McKenzic). Chio?fas/iissalicis-nigrae (Walsh), Alturas, Motloc Co., August ti, Aouidiella citrina (Coquillett), Reedley Area, Fresno Co., January, 1936, on Cornus sp. (dogwood). 1954, on Citrus sinensis (orange) (T. E. Corn). Lepidosaphes beckii (Newman), Santa Barbara, December 16, 1954. Aspidiot us liederae (Vallot), Sacramento, November. 1953, on on Citrus siiiensis (orange) (W. S. Cummiiigs). Hcdera helix (ivy) (R. Rollins). Z. Le,9idosaphes ulmi (Linnaeus), Sacramento, Novembcr 5, 1955, on Clirysor,iphalzrs Difasciculalus Ferris, Sacramento, November, I 953, Salix sp. (willow) (H. H. KeiCer). on Hedera helix (ivy) (R. Z. Rollins). Nilotaspis lialli (Green), Chico, Butte Go., May io, iyjo, on Pririrus Diaspidiotiu aizcyltcs (I'utnatn), Hemet, Riverside Co., June 18, amygdaliu (almond) (E. F. Fosen). 1954,on Primus armeniaca (apricot) (H. L. McKenzic). Parlatoria canwlliae (Comstock), Hickman, Stanislaus Co., Febru- Hemiber/esia degenerata (Leonardi), Sanger, Fresno Co., May 13, ary, 1954, on Camellia sp. tjrj'i, on Camellia sp. (J. C. Bedford). Parlatoria oleae (ColvPe), Madera Go., January 7, 1954, on Olea eicropaea (olive) (T. B. Gallion). HerrriIJerlessia Iataniac (Signoret), Orange Co., May 30, I 954, on Persea sp. (avocado) (D. Bishop). Parlntoria pitloslmri Maskell, Sari IXcgo, December 9, I 95.1, on 1~~i~di~iga.spi.~rossi (Maskell), Montecito, Santa Barbara Co., De- Pittosporiiw sp. (R. 1;. Wilkey). cember 6, 1~15.~.on Sequoia sorrrl~emirem(redwood) antl Arau- l'lieuaeaslJis pirri\olictc (Fitch), Crestline, San Bernardino Co., coria sp. (W. S. <:unintings). March $1. tjrj.1, on Pit/iis /Joirc/crosri (yellow pine) (C. I.. L)owti- ing). Nitcidaspis ca/i/ornicn (Coleman), Lake Gregory, Sari Bernardino Co., hlarcli 9. tgrj.1, on Pims ponderosa (yello\r pine) (G. L. ('/io.s@'s cuoiiyiui (Comstock), Sacratticitto, Novcmh '1, tc~5.1,ott 1)owtiing). Euonyiiius sp. (H. L. Rlclicitzic). CONTENTS List of coloredphotographs ............................................................ v Introduction .......................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments ................................................................... 1 Scope of study....................................................................... 2 Description and general biology ....................................................... 2 Collecting and preserving diaspidids .................................................. 3 Preparation of mounts ............................................................... 4 iiabit and morphological characters ...................................................... 5 h.lorphology ........................................................................... 8 Classification ........................................................................ 17 Subfamily Phoenicococcinae .......................................................... 19 Subfamily Diaspidinae ............................................................... 17 Tribe Diaspidini .................................................................... 20 Tribe Aspidiotini ................................................................... 20 Tribe Odonaspidini .................................................................. 21 Systematics ......................................................................... 21 Treatment of species ................................................................ 37 Tribe Aspidiotini ................................................................... 37 Tribe Diaspidini .................................................................... 87 Tribe Odonaspidini .................................................................. 163 Suhfamily Phenicococcinae ........................................................... 167 Distribution table ..................................................................... 163 Literature cited ....................................................................... 172 Host list ............................................................................. 173 Host index ........................................................................... 193 Index to genera. species. and higher categories ........................................... 203 EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS IN FIGURES Except for the first three figures which are purely morphological and which are explained independently, a standard system of labeling the illustrations has been employed. This system of labeling will be as follows: A. Antenna and cephalic margin of first stage. B. Habitat sketch. C. Antenna of adult female. D. Anterior spiracle of adult female. The anterior spiracle has been chosen for illustration because signific.ant differences, such as pore arrangement, occur with these rather than in the posterior pair. E. Pygidium of second-stage female. EE. General outline of second stage in those forms which are pupillarial. F. General features of adult female. G. Pygidium of adult female. H. Dorsal aspect of detail of pygidial margin of adult female. I. Ventral aspect of detail of pygidial margin of adult female. J. Outline of exuvium of first stage in a few forms. Unlettered figures of details are connected with their points of origin by guide lines and should be readily identifiable. INTRODUCTION One of the groups of insects most important to the establish this fact, it is only necessary to cite agriculturalist today is that family including the the activities of California red scale, Aonidiella creatures popularly known as the “armored scales” aurantii (Maskell), so destructive to citrus in or “diaspidids.” This study deals specifically California. with the scale insects belonging to the homopterous Some species are restricted to a single host, family Diaspididae. Unforiunately, they are very others to a single genus or family of host species, unattractive to the average entomologist, and even but many are extremely omnivorous and infest many more so to the agriculturalist; yet a knowledge of plants of unrelated groups. The diaspidids are each species, together with the best methods of generally distributed throughout the world wherever control, is an essential part of the education of suitable food plants are grown. It has been proven, every fruit grower. Furthermore, there is scarcely that though many genera are native to certain re- any tree or shrub that is not subject to their attack. gions they have been distributed in commerce to The minute size of these creatures, their wonder- other parts of the world. ful reproductive powers, and the difficulty of Carnes (1907)presented a treatise, The Coccidae destroying
Recommended publications
  • Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects
    © 2019 JETIR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects Devina Seram and Yendrembam K Devi Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab Introduction Insect Adaptations An adaptation is an environmental change so an insect can better fit in and have a better chance of living. Insects are modified in many ways according to their environment. Insects can have adapted legs, mouthparts, body shapes, etc. which makes them easier to survive in the environment that they live in and these adaptations also help them get away from predators and other natural enemies. Here are some adaptations in the immature stages of important families of Hemiptera. Hemiptera are hemimetabolous exopterygotes with only egg and nymphal immature stages and are divided into two sub-orders, homoptera and heteroptera. The immature stages of homopteran families include Delphacidae, Fulgoridae, Cercopidae, Cicadidae, Membracidae, Cicadellidae, Psyllidae, Aleyrodidae, Aphididae, Phylloxeridae, Coccidae, Pseudococcidae, Diaspididae and heteropteran families Notonectidae, Corixidae, Belastomatidae, Nepidae, Hydrometridae, Gerridae, Veliidae, Cimicidae, Reduviidae, Pentatomidae, Lygaeidae, Coreidae, Tingitidae, Miridae will be discussed. Homopteran families 1. Delphacidae – Eg. plant hoppers They comprise the largest family of plant hoppers and are characterized by the presence of large, flattened spurs at the apex of their hind tibiae. Eggs are deposited inside plant tissues, elliptical in shape, colourless to whitish. Nymphs are similar in appearance to adults except for size, colour, under- developed wing pads and genitalia. 2. Fulgoridae – Eg. lantern bugs They can be recognized with their antennae inserted on the sides & beneath the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycad Aulacaspis Scale
    Invasive Insects: Risks and Pathways Project CYCAD AULACASPIS SCALE UPDATED: APRIL 2020 Invasive insects are a huge biosecurity challenge. We profile some of the most harmful insect invaders overseas to show why we must keep them out of Australia. Species Cycad aulacaspis scale / Aulacaspis yasumatsui. Also known as Asian cycad scale. Main impacts Decimates wild cycad populations, kills cultivated cycads. Native range Thailand. Invasive range China, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Guam, United States, Caribbean Islands, Mexico, France, Ivory Coast1,2. Detected in New Zealand in 2004, but eradicated.2 Main pathways of global spread As a contaminant of traded nursery material (cycads and cycad foliage).3 WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR The adult female cycad aulacaspis scale has a white cover (scale), 1.2–1.6 mm long, ENVIRONMENTAL variable in shape and sometimes translucent enough to see the orange insect with its IMPACTS OVERSEAS orange eggs beneath. The scale of the male is white and elongate, 0.5–0.6 mm long. Photo: Jeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, The cycad aulacaspis scale has decimated Bugwood.org | CC BY 3.0 cycads on Guam since it appeared there in 2003. The affected species, Cycas micronesica, was once the most common cause cycad extinctions around the world, Taiwan, 100,000 cycads were destroyed tree on Guam, but was listed by the IUCN 7 including in India10 and Indonesia11. The by an outbreak of the scale . It is difficult as endangered in 2006 following attacks continuous removal of plant sap by the to control in cultivation because of high by three insect pests, of which this scale scale depletes cycads of carbohydrates4,9.
    [Show full text]
  • Insetos Do Brasil
    COSTA LIMA INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS A. DA COSTA LIMA Professor Catedrático de Entomologia Agrícola da Escola Nacional de Agronomia Ex-Chefe de Laboratório do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO CAPÍTULO XXII HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 CONTEUDO CAPÍTULO XXII PÁGINA Ordem HEMÍPTERA ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Superfamília SCUTELLEROIDEA ............................................................................................................ 42 Superfamília COREOIDEA ............................................................................................................................... 79 Super família LYGAEOIDEA ................................................................................................................................. 97 Superfamília THAUMASTOTHERIOIDEA ............................................................................................... 124 Superfamília ARADOIDEA ................................................................................................................................... 125 Superfamília TINGITOIDEA .................................................................................................................................... 132 Superfamília REDUVIOIDEA ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects
    Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Aonidiella citrina IDENTITY Name: Aonidiella citrina (Coquillett) Synonyms: Aspidiotus citrinus Coquillett Chrysomphalus aurantii citrinus (Coquillett) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Hemiptera: Homoptera: Diaspididae Common names: Yellow scale (English) Cochenille jaune (French) Escama amarilla de los cítricos (Spanish) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: The original description by Coquillett is inadequate and simply refers to 'the yellow scale' on orange (Nel, 1933). A. citrina is morphologically very similar to the Californian red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell), and was considered to be a variety until Nel (1933) raised it to specific level based on a comparative study of their ecology, biology and morphology. Bayer computer code: AONDCI EU Annex designation: II/A1 HOSTS A. citrina is polyphagous attacking plant species belonging to more than 50 genera in 32 families. The main hosts of economic importance are Citrus spp., especially oranges (C. sinensis), but the insect is also recorded incidentally on a wide range of ornamentals and some fruit crops including Acacia, bananas (Musa paradisiaca), Camellia including tea (C. sinensis), Clematis, Cucurbitaceae, Eucalyptus, Euonymus, guavas (Psidium guajava), Hedera helix, Jasminum, Ficus, Ligustrum, Magnolia, mangoes (Mangifera indica), Myrica, olives (Olea europea), peaches (Prunus persica), poplars (Populus), Rosa, Schefflera actinophylla, Strelitzia reginae, Viburnum and Yucca. The main potential hosts in the EPPO region are Citrus spp. growing in the southern part of the region, around the Mediterranean. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION A. citrina originated in Asia and has spread to various tropical and subtropical regions throughout the world. The precise distribution of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of the Cycad Aulacaspis Scale in Northern Florida During Sub-Freezing Weather
    furcata) (FDACS/DPI, 2002). These thrips are foliage feeders North American Plant Protection Organization’s Phytosanitary causing galling and leaf curl, which is cosmetic and has not Alert System been associated with plant decline. This feeding damage is http://www.pestalert.org only to new foliage and appears to be seasonal. This pest is be- coming established in urban areas causing concern to home- Literature Cited owners and commercial landscapers due to leaf damage. Control is difficult due to protection by leaf galls. Howev- Edwards, G. B. 2002. Pest Alert, Holopothrips sp., an Introduced Thrips Pest er, systemic insecticides are providing some control. No bio- of Trumpet Tree. March 2002. <http://doacs.state.fl.us/~pi/enpp/ ento/images/paholo-pothrips3.02.gif>. controls have been found. FDACS/DPI. 2002. TRI-OLOGY. Mar.-Apr. 2002. Fla. Dept. Agr. Cons. Serv./ Div. Plant Ind. Newsletter, vol. 41, no. 2. <http://doacs.state.fl.us/~pi/ Resources for New Insect Pest Information enpp/02-mar-apr.html>. Howard, F. W., A. Hamon, G. S. Hodges, C. M. Mannion, and J. Wofford. 2002. Lobate Lac Scale, Paratachardina lobata lobata (Chamberlin) (Hemip- The following are some web sites and list serves for addi- tera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Kerriidae). Univ. of Fla. Cir., EENY- tional information on new insects pests in Florida. 276. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IN471>. Hoy, M. A., A. Hamon, and R. Nguyen. 2003. Pink Hibiscus Mealybug, Ma- University of Florida Pest Alert conellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Insecta: Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). http://extlab7.entnem.ufl.edu/PestAlert/ Univ. of Fla. Cir., EENY-29. <http://creatures.ifas.ufl.edu/orn/mealybug/ mealybug.htm>.
    [Show full text]
  • Scale Insects (Coccoidae: Hemiptera) Infested Citrus Trees and Thier Natural Enemies, with a Key of These Pests in Egypt Mona
    Egypt. Acad. J. biolog. Sci., 5(1): 1- 23 (2012) A. Entomology Email: [email protected] ISSN: 1687– 8809 Received: 15/1/2012 www.eajbs.eg.net Scale insects (Coccoidae: Hemiptera) infested citrus trees and thier natural enemies, with a key of these pests in Egypt Mona Moustafa Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. ABSTRACT Scale insects (Coccoidae: Hemiptera) are the most important pests infested citrus trees in Egypt. The present work dealt with the scale insects infested citrus trees and thier natural enemies as well as a key of these pests in Egypt . The results indicated that seven species of scale insects were recorded infested citrus trees in Egypt. Also taxonomic key of the seven species of scale insects was included. During the present work the results indicated that the populations of red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) has two peaks one in April and the second one in October. In this work two parasitoids recorded associated with red scale. Theses are Aphytis lingnanensis Compere and Habrolepis aspidioti Compere and Annecke.It is recorded here two peaks for each parasitoid in April and October for A. lingnanensis and in July and November for H. aspidioti in Beni- Suef. Also this work indicated that citrus wax scale, Ceroplastes floridensis Comstock has two peaks the first in May and the second in October. In the present work two parasitoids recorded associated with citrus wax scale. These are Metaphycus helvolus (Compere) and Microterus flavus (Howard). It is recorded here two peaks for each parasitoid in May and October for in Gharbiya .The present work observed , black scale Chrysomphalus aonidum (L.) has two peaks the first in May and the second in November.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) © 2013 Akinik Publications Received: 28-06-2013 Shaaban Abd-Rabou*, Hassan Ghahari, Svetlana N
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2013;1 (4): 116-140 ISSN 2320-7078 Iranian Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) JEZS 2013;1 (4): 116-140 © 2013 AkiNik Publications Received: 28-06-2013 Shaaban Abd-Rabou*, Hassan Ghahari, Svetlana N. Myartseva & Enrique Ruíz- Cancino Accepted: 23-07-2013 ABSTRACT Aphelinidae is one of the most important families in biological control of insect pests at a worldwide level. The following catalogue of the Iranian fauna of Aphelinidae includes a list of all genera and species recorded for the country, their distribution in and outside Iran, and known hosts in Iran. In total 138 species from 11 genera (Ablerus, Aphelinus, Aphytis, Coccobius, Coccophagoides, Coccophagus, Encarsia, Eretmocerus, Marietta, Myiocnema, Pteroptrix) are listed as the fauna of Iran. Aphelinus semiflavus Howard, 1908 and Coccophagoides similis (Masi, 1908) are new records for Iran. Key words: Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Aphelinidae, Catalogue. Shaaban Abd-Rabou Plant Protection Research 1. Introduction Institute, Agricultural Research Aphelinid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) are important in nature, Center, Dokki-Giza, Egypt. especially in the population regulation of hemipterans on many different plants.These [E-mail: [email protected]] parasitoid wasps are also relevant in the biological control of whiteflies, soft scales and aphids [44] Hassan Ghahari . Studies on this family have been done mainly in relation with pests of fruit crops as citrus Department of Plant Protection, and others. John S. Noyes has published an Interactive On-line Catalogue [78] which includes Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad up-to-date published information on the taxonomy, distribution and hosts records for the University, Tehran, Iran. Chalcidoidea known throughout the world, including more than 1300 described species in 34 [E-mail: [email protected]] genera at world level.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Recommendations on Cycad Aulacaspis Scale, Aulacaspis Yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
    IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group – Subgroup on Invasive Pests Report and Recommendations on Cycad Aulacaspis Scale, Aulacaspis yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) 18 September 2005 Subgroup Members (Affiliated Institution & Location) • William Tang, Subgroup Leader (USDA-APHIS-PPQ, Miami, FL, USA) • Dr. John Donaldson, CSG Chair (South African National Biodiversity Institute & Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town, South Africa) • Jody Haynes (Montgomery Botanical Center, Miami, FL, USA)1 • Dr. Irene Terry (Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) Consultants • Dr. Anne Brooke (Guam National Wildlife Refuge, Dededo, Guam) • Michael Davenport (Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, Miami, FL, USA) • Dr. Thomas Marler (College of Natural & Applied Sciences - AES, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam) • Christine Wiese (Montgomery Botanical Center, Miami, FL, USA) Introduction The IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group – Subgroup on Invasive Pests was formed in June 2005 to address the emerging threat to wild cycad populations from the artificial spread of insect pests and pathogens of cycads. Recently, an aggressive pest on cycads, the cycad aulacaspis scale (CAS)— Aulacaspis yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)—has spread through human activity and commerce to the point where two species of cycads face imminent extinction in the wild. Given its mission of cycad conservation, we believe the CSG should clearly focus its attention on mitigating the impact of CAS on wild cycad populations and cultivated cycad collections of conservation importance (e.g., Montgomery Botanical Center). The control of CAS in home gardens, commercial nurseries, and city landscapes is outside the scope of this report and is a topic covered in various online resources (see www.montgomerybotanical.org/Pages/CASlinks.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • HOST PLANTS of SOME STERNORRHYNCHA (Phytophthires) in NETHERLANDS NEW GUINEA (Homoptera)
    Pacific Insects 4 (1) : 119-120 January 31, 1962 HOST PLANTS OF SOME STERNORRHYNCHA (Phytophthires) IN NETHERLANDS NEW GUINEA (Homoptera) By R. T. Simon Thomas DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, HOLLANDIA In this paper, I list 15 hostplants of some Phytophthires of Netherlands New Guinea. Families, genera within the families and species within the genera are mentioned in alpha­ betical order. The genera and the specific names of the insects are printed in bold-face type, those of the plants are in italics. The locality, where the insects were found, is printed after the host plants. Then follows the date of collection and finally the name of the collector1 in parentheses. I want to acknowledge my great appreciation for the identification of the Aphididae to Mr. D. Hille Ris Lambers and of the Coccoidea to Dr. A. Reyne. Aphididae Cerataphis variabilis Hrl. Cocos nucifera Linn.: Koor, near Sorong, 26-VII-1961 (S. Th.). Longiunguis sacchari Zehntner. Andropogon sorghum Brot.: Kota Nica2 13-V-1959 (S. Th.). Toxoptera aurantii Fonsc. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Theobroma cacao Linn.: Kota Nica, 19-VIII-1959 (S. Th.), Amban-South, near Manokwari, 1-XII- 1960 (J. Schreurs). Toxoptera citricida Kirkaldy. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Schizaphis cyperi v. d. Goot, subsp, hollandiae Hille Ris Lambers (in litt.). Polytrias amaura O. K.: Hollandia, 22-V-1958 (van Leeuwen). COCCOIDEA Aleurodidae Aleurocanthus sp. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Asterolecaniidae Asterolecanium pustulans (Cockerell). Leucaena glauca Bth.: Kota Nica, 8-X-1960 (S. Th.). 1. My name, as collector, is mentioned thus: "S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspidiotus Nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2003 Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae). Lisa M. Provencher University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Provencher, Lisa M., "Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)." (2003). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3090. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3090 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by LISA M. PROVENCHER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2003 Entomology MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by Lisa M. Provencher Roy G. V^n Driesche, Department Head Department of Entomology What is the opposite of A. nerii? iuvf y :j3MSuy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Edward and Mari, for their patience and understanding while I worked on this master’s thesis. And a thank you also goes to Michael Sacco for the A. nerii jokes. I would like to thank my advisor Benjamin Normark, and a special thank you to committee member Jason Cryan for all his generous guidance, assistance and time.
    [Show full text]