DOCSLIB.ORG

Methods and Work Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methods and Work Profile REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services ........................................ 46 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2 Heathland in the UK ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3 Ecosystem services ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4 Services from heathland ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.1 Provisioning services ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.2 Regulating services ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.3 Cultural services .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.4 Supporting services ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.5 Additional services ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5 Discussion ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 4. Impact on Ericaceous Host Species ...................................................................... 46 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 56 4.2 Host Mapping ..................................................................................................................... 56 4.2.1 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 56 4.2.2 Results ...................................................................................................................... 63 4.3 Risk Scenarios ................................................................................................................... 73 4.3.1 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 73 4.3.2 Results ...................................................................................................................... 75 4.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 80 5. Options to predict climate driven changes on the potential UK distribution of Phytophthora. 82 3 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 82 5.2 CLIMEX model ................................................................................................................... 82 5.3 Incorporation into Epidemiological models ......................................................................... 83 5.4 General Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 84 6. Designated Sites and BAP Habitats ...................................................................... 86 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 86 6.2 Potential impact of Phytophthora infection on habitat condition ......................................... 86 6.2.1 Habitat specific Common Standards Monitoring Guidance. ...................................... 87 6.2.2 Likely impact of Phytophthora on condition criteria ................................................... 90 6.3 Mapping of Designated Sites ............................................................................................. 91 6.3.2 National Inventory of Heathland ................................................................................ 95 6.4 Results ............................................................................................................................... 95 6.4.1 Designated Sites ....................................................................................................... 95 6.4.2 National Inventory of Heathland ................................................................................ 98 7. Synthesis and Conclusions .................................................................................... 99 7.1 Summary of likely impacts ................................................................................................. 99 7.1.1 Other species ............................................................................................................ 99 7.1.2 Ecosystem services ................................................................................................. 100 7.1.3 Designated sites ...................................................................................................... 101 7.2 Likely impact of each scenario ......................................................................................... 102 7.2.1 High ......................................................................................................................... 102 7.2.2 Medium .................................................................................................................... 102 7.2.3 Low .......................................................................................................................... 102 7.3 Future Research Priorities ............................................................................................... 103 8. References .......................................................................................................... 104 8.1 Associated Species References ...................................................................................... 108 4 Table 1 Susceptibility of a range of heathland species to P. kernoviae and P. ramorum under laboratory conditions (CSL, 2007). .......................................................................................... 14 Table 2 Phytophagous invertebrates that may vulnerable to the loss of, Vaccinium myrtillus (1), Vaccinium vitis-idaea (2) or Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (3) or a combination which may include Calluna vulgaris (4). ................................................................................................................. 19 Table 3 Phytophagous invertebrates which were included in a list of of insects using, Vaccinium myrtillus (1), Vaccinium vitis-idaea (2), Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (3) or Calluna vulgaris (4) or a combination as host plants but may need to be included even though there is uncertainty in their distribution data or host plant range. ............................................................................... 26 Table 4 Phytophagous invertebrates which were included in a list of of insects recorded as feeding on Vaccinium myrtillus (1), Vaccinium vitis-idaea (2), Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (3) or Calluna vulgaris (4) or a combination but were listed under a synonym. .............................................. 27 Table 5 Phytophagous invertebrates which were included in a list of of insects using Vaccinium myrtillus as a host plant but were excluded as they are immigrants or extinct. ....................... 28 Table 6 Phytophagous invertebrates which were included in a list of of insects using Vaccinium myrtillus or Calluna vulgaris as a host plant but were excluded as they use different food plants ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 7 Phytophagous fungi and invertebrates which were recorded as using Vaccinium myrtillus (1), V. vitis-idaea (2) or Calluna vulgaris (4) as a host plant but were excluded as they were introduced to England and Wales ............................................................................................ 30 Table 8 Invertebrates which have been recorded visiting flowers to collect pollen and/or nectar of Vaccinium myrtillus (1),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
    FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park
    Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Platarctia parthenos Photo: D. Vujnovic Prepared for: Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Prepared by: Doug Macaulay and Greg Pohl Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild May 10, 2005 Figure 1. Doug Macaulay and Gerald Hilchie walking on a cutline near site 26. (Photo by Stacy Macaulay) Figure 2. Stacey Macaulay crossing a beaver dam at site 33. (Photo by Doug Macaulay) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. Factors affecting the Survey...........................................................................................4 II. Taxa of particular interest.............................................................................................5 A. Butterflies:...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Macro-moths ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) from China Paralypusa – Новый Род Семейства Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) Из Китая
    ZOOSYSTEMATICA ROSSICA, 21(1): 169–172 25 JULY 2012 Paralypusa, a new genus of the family Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) from China Paralypusa – новый род семейства Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) из Китая A.L. LVOVSKY А.Л. ЛЬВОВСКИЙ A.L. Lvovsky, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] A new eastern-palaearctic monotypic genus of the gelechioid moths, Paralypusa gen. nov., is established for the Chinese species Paralypusa chinensis (Lvovsky, 2010), comb. nov. This genus is considered closely related to Lypusa Zeller, 1852 on the base of several synapomor- phies. However Paralypusa also shares some features with the genera Pseudatemelia Rebel, 1910 and Amphisbatis Zeller, 1870. Its transitional state confirms the belonging of all the afore- mentioned genera to one family and synonymy of the Lypusidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857 and Amphisbatidae Spuler, 1910 (Nieukerken et al., 2011). Описан новый восточнопалеарктический монотипический род гелехиоидных чешуекры- лых Paralypusa gen. nov., включающий китайский вид Paralypusa chinensis (Lvovsky, 2010), comb. nov. Этот род сближается с родом Lypusa Zeller, 1852 на основании ряда синапоморфий. Тем не менее, Paralypusa также имеет признаки, общие с Pseudatemelia Rebel, 1910 и Amphisbatis Zeller, 1870. Его промежуточное положение подтверждает принадлежность всех вышеупомянутых родов к одному семейству и синонимию Lypusi- dae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857 and Amphisbatidae Spuler, 1910 (Nieukerken et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARATIVE LIFE HISTORY of COCONUT SCALE INSECT, Aspidiotus Rigidus Reyne (HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE), on COCONUT and MANGOSTEEN
    J. ISSAAS Vol. 25, No. 1: 123-134 (2019) COMPARATIVE LIFE HISTORY OF COCONUT SCALE INSECT, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE), ON COCONUT AND MANGOSTEEN Cris Q. Cortaga, Maria Luz J. Sison, Joseph P. Lagman, Edward Cedrick J. Fernandez and Hayde F. Galvez Institute of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines 4031 Corresponding author: [email protected] (Received: October 3, 2018; Accepted: May 19, 2019) ABSTRACT The devastation of millions of coconut palms caused by outbreak infestation of the invasive Coconut Scale Insect (CSI) Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, has posed a serious threat to the industry in the Philippines. The life history of A. rigidus on coconut and mangosteen was comparatively studied to understand the effects of host-plant species on its development, to investigate potential host-suitability factors that contributed to its outbreak infestation, and to gather baseline information on the development and characteristics of this pest. The study was conducted at the Institute of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños. Insect size (body and scale) was not significantly different on both hosts during egg, crawler, white cap, pre-second and second instar stages, as well as during male pre-pupal, pupal and adult stages. The female third instars and adults, however, were bigger on mangosteen than on coconut. At the end of second instar, sexual differentiation was very visible wherein parthenogenic females further undergone two developmental stages: third instar and adults that feed permanently on the leaves. Males undergone three stages: pre- pupa, pupa and winged adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowland Heathland 2016.Pdf
    www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk ACTION for WILDLIFE Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Local Biodiversity Action Plan REVISED PLAN FEBRUARY 2016 LOWLAND HEATHLAND 1. INTRODUCTION Lowland heathland is typified by the presence of heather (Calluna vulgaris), dwarf gorse (Ulex minor) and cross-leaved heath (Erica tetralix) and is generally found below 300 metres in altitude on poor acid soils. Areas of good quality heathland should consist of an ericaceous layer of varying heights and structures, some areas of scattered trees and scrub, and areas of bare ground, gorse, wet heaths, bogs and open water. Heathland at Grendon Lowland heathland is a priority for nature conservation because it is a © Steven Cheshire rare and threatened habitat. Areas of heathland in good condition should consist of an ericaceous layer of varying heights and structures, plus some or all of the following additional features, depending on environmental and/or management conditions: scattered and clumped trees and scrub; bracken; areas of bare ground and acid grassland; lichens; gorse; wet heaths, bogs and open waters (JNCC, 2008). The following moths are useful indicators for assessing the quality of heathland habitat: Aristotelia ericinella (Micro), Narrow-winged Pug (Eupithecia nanata), True Lovers’ Knot (Lycophotia porphyria), Heath Rustic (Xestia agathina agathina) and Beautiful Yellow Underwing (Anarta myrtilli ( the latter known only from Grendon Common and Sutton Park, K.Warmington, 2015). 2. OBJECTIVES * TARGETS* Associated Action Plans are: ‘Lowland Acid Grassland’, ‘Bats’, ‘Adder’, ‘Dingy Skipper’, ‘Argent & Sable’ and ‘Rare Bumblebees’ PLEASE CONSULT THE ‘GENERIC HABITATS’ ACTION PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DOCUMENT FOR OBJECTIVES COMMON TO ALL HABITAT PLANS A. To achieve condition of 6ha of existing lowland heathland 2026 above 0.25ha that are currently in unfavourable condition, to favourable or recovering, giving priority to those holding UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species & Red Data Book species B.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspidiotus Nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2003 Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae). Lisa M. Provencher University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Provencher, Lisa M., "Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)." (2003). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3090. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3090 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by LISA M. PROVENCHER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2003 Entomology MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by Lisa M. Provencher Roy G. V^n Driesche, Department Head Department of Entomology What is the opposite of A. nerii? iuvf y :j3MSuy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Edward and Mari, for their patience and understanding while I worked on this master’s thesis. And a thank you also goes to Michael Sacco for the A. nerii jokes. I would like to thank my advisor Benjamin Normark, and a special thank you to committee member Jason Cryan for all his generous guidance, assistance and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]