DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too. So, we know a fair amount the plants that are present on the site that make up this variety of habitats, but little was known about what other species were present on site. A total of 143 species had been recorded on the site up to the start of 2018 (fig 1). Knowing which other species are present on the site is essential to be able to take them into account in the management and also to highlight the importance of the site to the general public to help them engage with it and protect its natural heritage. Grasshoppers, 1 Flies, 2 Bees, 1 Reptiles, 1 Damselflies, 1 Butterflies, 3 Birds, 9 Vascular plants, 125 Figure 1: Species recorded up to the start of 2018 In 2018, Matt Johnson from the Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire carried out a habitat survey as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s Lottery Funded Project. The report from this survey is available on the Friends’ website. This habitat survey generated records for a large number of vascular plants, and a 2 number of other species, many of which were new to the site. All of these records will be included in the records centre database. Encouraging Biological Recording in the Country Park Volunteers collect the majority of biological records. The records centre is reliant on these volunteer recorders to provide us with the data, which forms an evidence base so that biodiversity is taken into account in decision making. As the records centre is so reliant on volunteer recorders, the WILDside Project was launched in 2017. This project is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund and runs until the end of 2019. This project is all about encouraging and supporting biological recording in Northamptonshire. Throughout this project, we have been learning how to support biological recording more effectively and used what we had learnt to shape the activities we thought would help biological recording in the country park. We wanted local people to know that they could make a difference so gave a talk to the residents about wildlife recording and followed this up with a training day. We also had a BioBlitz to engage the public with the site and the wildlife present there. Hunsbury Park School backs onto the Country Park so it was important to engage the primary school children there with the site so we ran a session for them too. Myself giving a talk to local residents about biological recording 3 Biological Recording Training Day Following on from analysis of records in the database which showed that the Local Wildlife Site was under recorded in terms of the species that are found there, a training day was developed to teach participants how to generate high quality biological records. The focus was on species other than vascular plants as these have been covered by previous surveys. A presentation in the morning outlined what biological records are and their importance. A walk in the afternoon put this into practice with participants walking around the site and recording the species that they encountered. Lots of biological records were made on the day, with the majority of species encountered new for the site. All of these records are now in the records centre database. Myself showing participants an insect we found during the survey. They then looked up the species in the book and filled in the recording form. 4 One of the recording forms which participants filled in on the day The feedback from the day was positive as the day highlighted the importance of recording, the lack of records for the site and the wealth of wildlife that there is on the site. Following the workshop, it is hoped that local residents continue to monitor wildlife on the site and submit records to the records centre. Forest School Day On the 28th June, Ryan Clark and Rosalind Johnson ran an afternoon of activities with students from Hunsbury Park Primary School in the Local Wildlife Site. The school backs onto the county park area so the main aim of the afternoon was to teach the children about the wildlife in the area so they become more connected with it. An additional aim was to teach them basic identification skills and get them to look closer at the natural world around them. 5 The children could: Draw species Use identification charts to identify species Hunt for leaves, grasses and wildflowers to see what species they could find Use magnifying glasses to see species up close Using pooters to pick up insects without hurting them Pretend to be mice and have to be quiet and sneak around ‘the owl’ The children were shown the different activities and the ‘recording boundary’ and then given the freedom to choose which of these activities they wanted to do and change whenever they felt like it. This was so that they could feel free to explore the natural world around them whilst being safe. Some children drew insects they found 6 Some students drew and identified wildflowers Some students collected and identified wildflowers and leaves 7 The feedback we received from the day from both students and staff was very positive. The students learnt lots and had a great time while the staff picked up a few ideas for activities they would run again. Jacqueline Hughes, the forest school leader for the school said ‘Thank you so much for such an amazing afternoon. You inspired the children AND the adults to want to look more closely at the woodland and grassland areas. We were all so excited using the pooters...I feel I may have to buy some for school. It was a joy to see the children working so independently either on their own or in groups. Some were so focused on their tasks - and for many children this does not happen in the school environment.’ All the species that the children found were identified where possible and recorded. BioBlitz A BioBlitz is an intense period of biological recording, often in a public space. The aims of this BioBlitz were twofold. First, we wanted to generate robust data that highlights which species use the area. Secondly, we wanted to engage local people with the hillfort and highlight the wealth of wildlife around them so they appreciate and protect it. Traditionally a BioBlitz takes place over a 24 hour period so we split the event into an evening and a daytime session in order to maximise the number of species recorded. 8 31st August 2018 On the 31st August we had two evening sessions where around 20 members of the public joined us to do a bat survey and take part in moth trapping. The bat walk was really popular and allowed participants to see, and hear, three species of bat – the Common Pipistrelle, Soprano Pipistrelle and the Noctule. We then went back to see what the moth traps had attracted. The public loved seeing the 30 moth species that we recorded and a selection of these moths were kept overnight to show the public the following day, before being released. The moth traps also attracted a wide variety of other species, which generated more records for the site and engaged the public with these species too. One participant commented on how nice it was to see hornets up close. A full account of the moth trapping can be found in Appendix 2. Other feedback from these walks was very positive. With one participant saying that it is was a ‘Fun group activity suitable for all the family. We enjoyed learning a bit about bats at the beginning before going out. Also enjoyed the opportunity to do moth trapping as well.’ Others commented that ‘I had 2 young children with me and I felt that it was perfect for them and they had good interaction with the radios pictures and walk.’ Broad-bordered Yellow Underwing.
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S

    ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S

    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.

  • Moths Count Newsletter 2011

    16 Moths Count Newsletter 2011 Half Price Membership Offer Why not become a member of Butterfly Conservation for one Moths Count year at half the usual price? Offer available online from 16 th to 3 1st July 2 011 Ne wsl etter 2011 Membership subscriptions are essential to enable us to The NMRS: Pu tting continue all the important work we do to save threatened moths . By taking advantage of this special half price offer you will not Moths on the Map only get yourself a bargain but will also directly contribute to In the early days of the Moths Count project the the survival of these amazing creatures. Moths Count establishment of a National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS) Contacts was extremely ambitious, particularly as many vice-counties As a member of Butterfly Conservation didn’t have a computerised dataset; records were stored you will receive the following benefits: General enquiries on a card-index or in some cases even on scraps of paper info @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 400209 in cardboard boxes! Furthermore, 34 vice-counties didn’t I New member welcome pack Richard Fox have an active County Moth Recorder. Fortunately, due to I Our exclusive full-colour magazine Butterfly , three times a year Surveys Manager the enthusiasm and willingness of many individuals these I Membership of your local Butterfly Conservation Branch rfox @butterfly-conservation.org 01626 368385 hurdles were overcome. The moth recording community I Opportunities to take part in monitoring and recording schemes Les Hill rose to the challenge of either volunteering themselves for I Regional newsletters and local events Database Manager the vital role of County Moth Recorder or in assisting in lhill @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 406008 the computerisation of hundreds of thousands of paper To take advantage of this special half price offer join online at Zoë Randle records enabling County Recorders to concentrate on the www.butterfly-conservation.org between 16th and 3 1st July Surveys Officer verification of records.
  • Methods and Work Profile

    Methods and Work Profile

    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code

    Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code

    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
  • General Methods Will Be Outlined in Chapter 2

    General Methods Will Be Outlined in Chapter 2

    The Biodiversity of Abandoned Farmland Tom Fayle Gonville and Caius College April 2005 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy Mating Six-spot Burnet moths (Zygaena filipendulae) on the Roughs Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text. This dissertation does not exceed the limit of 15000 words in the main text, excluding figures, tables, legends and appendices. i Acknowledgements This work was carried out on the land of Miriam Rothschild, who sadly passed away before its completion. I would like to thank her for allowing me to stay at Ashton Wold during my fieldwork and making me feel welcome there. I would also like to thank the Eranda Foundation for funding this work. Various people have helped with the identification of my material and I am very grateful to them for their time. Brian Eversham was of great help in identifying my carabids and also took time out from his busy schedule to assist me for a day during my time in the field. Ray Symonds dedicated a great deal of time to identifying all the spiders I caught, a feat which would have undoubtedly taken me many weeks! Richard Preece identified all my gastropods, and I am grateful both to him and his student George Speller for passing on the material to him. Roger Morris verified the identification of voucher specimens of all the syrphids I caught, and Oliver Prŷs-Jones did the same for my bumblebees.
  • Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park

    Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park

    Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Platarctia parthenos Photo: D. Vujnovic Prepared for: Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Prepared by: Doug Macaulay and Greg Pohl Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild May 10, 2005 Figure 1. Doug Macaulay and Gerald Hilchie walking on a cutline near site 26. (Photo by Stacy Macaulay) Figure 2. Stacey Macaulay crossing a beaver dam at site 33. (Photo by Doug Macaulay) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. Factors affecting the Survey...........................................................................................4 II. Taxa of particular interest.............................................................................................5 A. Butterflies:...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Macro-moths ..................................................................................................................
  • Northampton Map & Guide

    Northampton Map & Guide

    northampton A-Z bus services in northampton to Brixworth, to Scaldwell Moulton to Kettering College T Abington H5 Northampton Town Centre F6 service monday to saturday monday to saturday sunday public transport in Market Harborough h e number operator route description daytime evening daytime and Leicester Abington Vale I5 Obelisk Rise F1 19 G to Sywell r 19.58 o 58 v and Kettering Bellinge L4 1 Stagecoach Town Centre – Blackthorn/Rectory Farm 10 mins 30 mins 20 mins e Overstone Lodge K2 0 1/4 1/2 Mile 62 X10 7A.10 Blackthorn K2 Parklands G2 (+ evenings hourly) northampton X10 8 0 1/2 1 Kilometre Boothville I2 0 7A.10 Pineham B8 1 Stagecoach Wootton Fields - General Hospital - Town Centre – peak-time hourly No Service No Service 5 from 4 June 2017 A H7 tree X10 X10 Brackmills t S t es Blackthorn/Rectory Farm off peak 30 mins W ch Queens Park F4 r h 10 X10 10 t r to Mears Ashby Briar Hill D7 Street o Chu oad Rectory Farm L2 core bus services other bus services N one Road R 2 Stagecoach Camp Hill - Town Centre - 15 mins Early evening only 30 mins verst O ll A e Bridleways L2 w (for full route details see frequency guide right) (for full route details see frequency guide right) s y d S h w a Riverside J5 Blackthorn/Rectory Farm le e o i y Camp Hill D7 V 77 R L d k a Moulton 1 o a r ue Round Spinney J1 X7 X7 h R 62 n a en Cliftonville G6 3 Stagecoach Town Centre – Harlestone Manor 5 to 6 journeys each way No Service No Service route 1 Other daily services g e P Av u n to 58 e o h Th Rye Hill C4 2 r Boughton ug 19 1 Collingtree F11 off peak 62 o route 2 Bo Other infrequent services b 7A r 5 a Crow Lane L4 Semilong F5 e Overstone H 10 3 Stagecoach Northampton – Hackleton hourly No Service No Service route 5 [X4] n Evenings / Sundays only a Park D5 D6 d Dallington Sixfields 7/7A 62 L 19 a Mo ulto routes 7/7A o n L 5 Stagecoach St.
  • Autographa Gamma

    Autographa Gamma

    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
  • The Distribution and Habitat Preferences of Bats in a Temperate Urban Landscape

    The Distribution and Habitat Preferences of Bats in a Temperate Urban Landscape

    The distribution and habitat preferences of bats in a temperate urban landscape Paul Lintott July 2015 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biological & Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences The University of Stirling Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis has been composed by myself and that it embodies the results of my own research. Where appropriate, I have acknowledged the nature and extent of work carried out in collaboration with others. ………………………………………………………………………….. Paul Lintott Summary Urbanisation is a key driver in the loss, fragmentation and modification of natural habitats resulting in the global loss of biodiversity. As the human population, and consequently the rate of urbanisation, continues to increase exponentially it is important to understand how to sustain and enhance biodiversity within the built environment. Cities comprise a complex assortment of habitat types yet relatively little is known of how its composition and spatial configuration can influence species presence or foraging activities. It is therefore necessary to examine habitat use and biodiversity patterns at multiple spatial scales to fully understand how species are responding to the urban matrix. There are few other orders of animals that are as strongly associated with people as bats (Chiroptera); for some bat species human habitations provide roosts and adaptations of the environment provide food sources. However bat species richness generally declines with increasing urbanisation indicating that many species are not able to persist in highly urbanised areas. In this thesis, I show that the behaviour, habitat preferences, and distribution of bats are strongly influenced by the built environment at both a local and landscape scale.
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century

    Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century

    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
  • Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes

    Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes

    Bugs and Beasties of the Western Rhodopes (a photoguide to some lesser-known species) by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser [email protected] Yagodina At Honeyguide, we aim to help you experience the full range of wildlife in the places we visit. Generally we start with birds, flowers and butterflies, but we don’t ignore 'other invertebrates'. In the western Rhodopes they are just so abundant and diverse that they are one of the abiding features of the area. While simply experiencing this diversity is sufficient for some, as naturalists many of us want to know more, and in particular to be able to give names to what we see. Therein lies the problem: especially in eastern Europe, there are few books covering the invertebrates in any comprehensive way. Hence this photoguide – while in no way can this be considered an ‘eastern Chinery’, it at least provides a taster of the rich invertebrate fauna you may encounter, based on a couple of Honeyguide holidays we have led in the western Rhodopes during June. We stayed most of the time in a tight area around Yagodina, and almost anything we saw could reasonably be expected to be seen almost anywhere around there in the right habitat. Most of the photos were taken in 2014, with a few additional ones from 2012. While these creatures have found their way into the lists of the holiday reports, relatively few have been accompanied by photos. We have attempted to name the species depicted, using the available books and the vast resources of the internet, but in many cases it has not been possible to be definitive and the identifications should be treated as a ‘best fit’.
  • Xyleninae 73.087 2385 Small Mottled Willow

    Xyleninae 73.087 2385 Small Mottled Willow

    Xyleninae 73.087 2385 Small Mottled Willow (Spodoptera exigua) 73.089 2386 Mediterranean Brocade (Spodoptera littoralis) 73.091 2396 Rosy Marbled (Elaphria venustula) 73.092 2387 Mottled Rustic (Caradrina morpheus) 73.093 2387a Clancy's Rustic (Caradrina kadenii) 73.095 2389 Pale Mottled Willow (Caradrina clavipalpis) 73.096 2381 Uncertain (Hoplodrina octogenaria) 73.0961 2381x Uncertain/Rustic agg. (Hoplodrina octogenaria/blanda) 73.097 2382 Rustic (Hoplodrina blanda) 73.099 2384 Vine's Rustic (Hoplodrina ambigua) 73.100 2391 Silky Wainscot (Chilodes maritima) 73.101 2380 Treble Lines (Charanyca trigrammica) 73.102 2302 Brown Rustic (Rusina ferruginea) 73.103 2392 Marsh Moth (Athetis pallustris) 73.104 2392a Porter's Rustic (Athetis hospes) 73.105 2301 Bird's Wing (Dypterygia scabriuscula) 73.106 2304 Orache Moth (Trachea atriplicis) 73.107 2300 Old Lady (Mormo maura) 73.109 2303 Straw Underwing (Thalpophila matura) 73.111 2097 Purple Cloud (Actinotia polyodon) 73.113 2306 Angle Shades (Phlogophora meticulosa) 73.114 2305 Small Angle Shades (Euplexia lucipara) 73.118 2367 Haworth's Minor (Celaena haworthii) 73.119 2368 Crescent (Helotropha leucostigma) 73.120 2352 Dusky Sallow (Eremobia ochroleuca) 73.121 2364 Frosted Orange (Gortyna flavago) 73.123 2361 Rosy Rustic (Hydraecia micacea) 73.124 2362 Butterbur (Hydraecia petasitis) 73.126 2358 Saltern Ear (Amphipoea fucosa) 73.127 2357 Large Ear (Amphipoea lucens) 73.128 2360 Ear Moth (Amphipoea oculea) 73.1281 2360x Ear Moth agg. (Amphipoea oculea agg.) 73.131 2353 Flounced Rustic (Luperina