ENCYCLOPEDIA of HEBREW LANGUAGE and LINGUISTICS Volume 3 P–Z

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENCYCLOPEDIA of HEBREW LANGUAGE and LINGUISTICS Volume 3 P–Z ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HEBREW LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS Volume 3 P–Z General Editor Geoffrey Khan Associate Editors Shmuel Bolokzy Steven E. Fassberg Gary A. Rendsburg Aaron D. Rubin Ora R. Schwarzwald Tamar Zewi LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 Table of Contents Volume One Introduction ........................................................................................................................ vii List of Contributors ............................................................................................................ ix Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... xiii Articles A-F ......................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Two Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Articles G-O ........................................................................................................................ 1 Volume Three Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Articles P-Z ......................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Four Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Index ................................................................................................................................... 1 © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 178 polysemy Polysemy 2007a; Morenz 2008), most of the Hebrew consonants have only one phonetic value and none bear logographic readings. Thus, poly- Polysemy is the capacity for a sign, word, semy in the Bible is primarily restricted to the phrase, or sentence to bear multiple meanings in levels of word, phrase, and sentence. Accord- a single context. It was observed in the Hebrew ingly, there are three primary ways that Israelite Bible, both in poetry and in prose, as early as authors could achieve polysemy—by exploiting the medieval times, but became the topic of homonyms, homographs, or single words with scholarly publications only after Casanowicz’s broad semantic ranges. Job’s lament in Job ground-breaking study (1893). Nevertheless, 9.30–31 demonstrates polysemy by way of despite more than a century of scholarly atten- homonyms. tion, the study of polysemy in the Hebrew Bible ִא ִם־ה ְתָר ַ ֥ח ְצ ִתּי ְב ֵמ ָ ֑י־שׁ ֶלג ַ֝ו ֲה ִז ֗כּ ִוֹתי ְבּ ֣בֹר ַכּ ָ ֽפּי: -remains in its infancy. We lack not only a con ָ֭אז ַבּ ַ ֣שּׁ ַחת ִתּ ְט ְבּ ֵ ֑ל ִני -sistent taxonomy for the various types of poly semy and their functions (e.g., Sasson 1976; ±im-hiμr<å™aßtì ∫ë-mè-š<ålÆ:g wa-h≥zikkòμì bë-∫òr cf. Beitzel 1980; Greenstein 1992), but also a kappåy< useful vocabulary (but see now Noegel 2013). ±åz< baš-ša™aμ ti†bëlènì Consequently, scholars have long used the Even if I should wash my hands with snow water, ,bë-∫òr ְבּ ֣בֹר terms ‘punning’ and ‘wordplay’ for all forms and clean my hands of polysemy (and paronomasia), even though You still would dip me in the pit. the former does not distinguish types and the bë-∫òr can mean ְבּ ֣בֹר latter implies that the device had a playful aim, In this passage the phrase which is not always the case ( Paronomasia). ‘with lye’ or ‘in a pit’. Though the readings Scholars have proposed a number of differ- derive from different roots, the former, from ,b-w-r בו"ר b-r-r, and the latter, from בר"ר .ent functions for the various types of polysemy Some types have been seen as demonstrations of the nouns are indistinguishable. Of course, the ,’bë-∫òr is ‘with lye ְבּ ֣בֹר erudition and literary or rhetorical flare (Bohl primary meaning of 1926; Herzberg 1979; Hoffman 1980). Others since it makes little sense for Job to wash his appear to have mnemonic or organizational hands in a pit. Nevertheless, the mention of a ša™aμ) just afterwards ַשׂ ַחת) functions (Freedman 1986; Hurowitz 2001). synonym for pit Still others seem to have comedic or satiri- leads the reader to recontextualize the meaning .bë-∫òr ְבּ ֣בֹר cal aims (Watson 1986:245). Some polysemes of also have a hermeneutic function (Fishbane A second way Israelite authors achieved pol- 1977; Lieberman 1978; Tigay 1983, Noegel ysemy was by means of homographs; words 2007a). More recently, scholars have proposed that look alike, but whose pronunciations dif- that some forms of polysemy are mechanisms fer. This form of polysemy obtains strictly on for unleashing or harnessing the illocution- a visual level. A textbook example appears in ary power of words (Noegel 2007a; 2009a; Job 26.12–13. 2010; 2013), especially when employed in pro- ְ֭בּכֹחוֹ ָרַ ֣גע ַהָיּ֑ם ֝וּ ִב ְת ָבוּנ ֗תוֹ ָ ֣מ ַחץ ָ ֽר ַהב: phetic or ritually empowered contexts (Schorch ְ֭בּרוּחוֹ ָשׁ ַ ֣מ ִים ִשׁ ְפָ ֑רה ֽחֹ ֲל ָלה ָ֝י ֗דוֹ ָנ ָ ֥חשׁ ָבִּֽר ַיח: -Regardless of its many possible func .(2000 bë-úò™ò r<å:ga≠ hay-y<åm u-∫i-μë∫ùn<åμò m<å™aß tions, it is clear that Israelite writers, like their < counterparts in Mesopotamia and Egypt, were råha∫ bë-rù™ò šåmayim< šiƒrå< ™òl≥l yå< ≈ò nå< ™åš< bår< ìa™ particularly skillful at employing polysemy. We < : råga≠ the sea, and by his skill he ָרַ ֣גע also should note that, while polysemes are By his power, he smashed Rahab. extremely difficult to capture in any translation, By his wind the heavens were calmed, his hand pierced there is evidence for attempts to do so in the Sep- the Fleeing Serpent. tuagint, Targumim, Vulgate, and other ancient -rå< ga: ≠ in this passage usually is ren ָרַ ֣גע witnesses (Noegel 1995; 1996a; 2011b). The verb Unlike the hieroglyphic and Akkadian writing dered ‘quieted, stilled’, or the like, thus presup- systems, in which individual signs bear multiple posing the Proto-Semitic root r-g-/. However, phonetic and logographic readings (Bottéro we also may derive the verb from Proto-Semitic 1977; Farber 1986; Loprieno 2000; Noegel r-g-≠ and translate it ‘disturbed’. Both readings © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 polysemy 179 are possible, though they are likely to have been 2. Double Entendres distinguished in speech at an early period (Blau 1982). Thus, this polyseme operates only on a A double entendre is an idiom or other figure visual register. of speech that may be understood in two ways. A third way of creating polysemy was to The first is straightforward, innocuous, and exploit the semantic range of a single word. An not the primary meaning intended by the user, example of this appears in Pharoah’s command whereas the second is the intended meaning. ,wë-≠attå< Often double entendres serve as euphemisms ְו ַﬠ ָתּ ֙ה ְל ֣כוּ ִﬠ ְב ֔דוּ :to Moses in Exod. 5.18 lëúù ≠i∫≈ù ‘Now get to your work!’. In this as in the command of David to Uriah, whom ֵ ֥רד :i∫≈ù can mean ‘work, he has just summoned from the battle field≠ ִﬠ ְב ֔דוּ passage the verb >rè≈ lë-∫èμúå< ù-r™aß ragl: Æúå ְל ֵב ְית ָ֖ך ְוּר ַ ֣חץ ַר ְג ֶ ֑ליָך ,labor’ or ‘worship, serve’. In the former sense the statement fits Pharaoh’s command that ‘go down to your house and wash your feet’ the taskmasters increase the workload for the (2 Sam. 11.8). Uriah realizes that David is using Israelites. However, as ‘worship’, it prefigures the polysemous idiom ‘wash one’s feet’ as a Pharaoh’s release of the Israelites to worship euphemism for ‘have sex’. This is clear from Yahweh at Mt. Sinai. Uriah’s reply to David the next morning, when To date scholars have identified at least fif- asked why he did not return to his home: ‘and teen types of polysemy in the Hebrew Bible. I should go to my home to eat and drink and These include: contronymic polysemy, double sleep with my wife!?’ (v. 11). entendre, antanaclasis, unidirectional polysemy, Janus parallelism, double polysemy, bilingual 3. Antanaclasis polysemy, polysemy clusters, numerical poly- semy, gematria, notariqon, acronymy, acrostics Antanaclasis is the repetition of the same word (also telestichs and menostichs), atbash, and or expression each time with a different mean- amphiboly. Each of these may perform dif- ing (Sasson 1976). While antanaclasis can have ferent functions depending on their contexts. a paronomastic effect, it does not involve hom- Moreover, these types and their functions can, onyms, but rather words or expressions of a and often do, overlap. Thus, a case of double single etymological derivation. Thus, it more polysemy or of amphiboly may also constitute properly belongs to the realm of polysemy. The a Janus parallelism, and also be part of a poly- device appears predominantly in poetry (Sasson semy cluster; basic polysemy and antanaclasis 1976:970; Ceresko 1982; Noegel 2007b:21–23). also can serve as double entendres, and so on. However, a classic prose example appears in There appears to be no limit to the sophistica- the narrative concerning the dreams of Pha- tion of the Israelite writers. raoh’s cupbearer and baker (Gen. 40). In this short pericope, we find two different uses of the nå< «å< ±èμ hå-r< òš ‘lift up ָנ ָשׂא ֵאת ָהר ֹאשׁ Contronymic Polysemy phrase .1 the head’ (Marcus 1990). In Gen. 40.13 Joseph A word that bears its own meaning and its uses it to predict that Pharaoh will ‘lift up your opposite is called a contronym (known as head’, i.e., pardon the cupbearer. However, ±a∂dàd ‘opposites’ in Arabic; Nöldeke 1910; when interpreting the
Recommended publications
  • A Neural Network Ensemble Model for Lexical Blends
    Neuramanteau: A Neural Network Ensemble Model for Lexical Blends Kollol Das Shaona Ghosh [email protected] [email protected] Independent Researcher University of Cambridge Bangalore, India Department of Engineering, Cambridge, UK Word1 Word2 Blend Structure Category Coverage Abstract aviation electronics avionics avi-onics Prefix + Suffix 16.74% communicate fake communifake communi-fake Prefix + Word 10.78% speak typo speako speak-o Word + Letter 0.14% The problem of blend formation in genera- west indiea windies w-indies Letter + Word 0.89% point broadcast pointcast point-cast Word + Suffix 22.56% tive linguistics is interesting in the context scientific fiction scientifiction scienti-fic-tion Word + Word overlap 22.56% of neologism, their quick adoption in mod- affluence influenza affluenza af-fluen-za Prefix + Suffix overlap 13.98% brad angelina brangelina br-a-ngelina Prefix + Word overlap 11.39% ern life and the creative generative pro- subvert advertising subvertising sub-vert-ising Word + Suffix overlap 16.31% cess guiding their formation. Blend qual- Table 1: Sample blends in our dataset along with the type ity depends on multitude of factors with and coverage. There are other types of rare blends that is high degrees of uncertainty. In this work, beyond the scope of this work. we investigate if the modern neural net- work models can sufficiently capture and recognize the creative blend composition blending systems include generating names of process. We propose recurrent neural net- products, brands, businesses and advertisements to work sequence-to-sequence models, that name a few especially if coupled with contextual are evaluated on multiple blend datasets information about the business or sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew Blends
    Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew blends Item Type text; Article Authors Pham, Mike Publisher University of Arizona Linguistics Circle (Tucson, Arizona) Journal Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Theory at the University of Arizona Rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Download date 23/09/2021 10:05:19 Item License Copyright © is held by the author(s). Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/143562 The Coyote Papers 18 (May 2011), University of Arizona Linguistics Department, Tucson, AZ., U.S.A. Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew blends Mike Pham University of Chicago [email protected] Keywords Distributed Morphology, blend, idiom, Modern Hebrew, Locality Constraints Abstract In this paper I use the Distributional Morphology framework and semantic Locality Constraints proposed by Arad (2003) to look at category assignments of blends in Modern Hebrew, as well as blends, compounds and idioms in English where relevant. Bat-El (1996) provides an explicit phonological analysis of Modern Hebrew blends, and argues against any morphological process at play in blend formation. I argue, however, that blends and compounds must be accounted for within morphology due to category assignments. I first demonstrate that blends are unquestion- ably formed by blending fully inflected words rather than roots, and then subsequently reject an analysis that accounts for weakened Locality Constraints by proposing the formation of a new root. Instead, I propose a hypothesis of Idiomatic Root Merge where a root can be an n-place predicate that selects at least an XP sister and a category head. This proposal also entails that there is a structural difference between two surface-similar phrases that have respectively literal and idiomatic meanings.1 1 Introduction Blending is a word-formation process that is highly productive in certain languages, such as Modern Hebrew and English, and much like compounding, involves combining multiple words into a form that behaves as a single syntactic and semantic unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Blending Process of New Blend-Words on Buzzfeed and Boredpanda Articles, and Pinterest Platform
    BLENDING PROCESS OF NEW BLEND-WORDS ON BUZZFEED AND BOREDPANDA ARTICLES, AND PINTEREST PLATFORM THESIS By: Niken Latifa NIM. 16320107 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2020 BLENDING PROCESS OF NEW BLEND-WORDS ON BUZZFEED AND BOREDPANDA ARTICLES, AND PINTEREST PLATFORM THESIS Presented to: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang In Partal Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra (S.S.) By: Niken Latifa NIM. 16320107 Advisor: Dr. Hj. Syafiyah, M.A. NIP. 196609101991032002 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2020 i ii iii iv MOTTO َفإِ َّن َم َع ا ْلعُسْ ِر يُسْ ًرا For indeed, with hardship will be ease. فَ اذْكُ رُ و نِي أ َذْكُ رْ كُمْ َو ا شْكُ رُ وا لِي َو ََل ت َكْفُ رُ ونِ So, remember me I will remember you and be grateful to Me and do not deny Me. v DEDICATION This thesis is especially dedicated to: My beloved parents Mama and Bapak My beloved sister and brothers vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All praises to the Almighty Allah SWT, God of this universe. He gave me strength and health to make this thesis complete. Sholawat and salam to the Prophet Muhammad SAW, the best figure for people in the world and who has brought Islam as rahmatan lil ‘alamin religion. This thesis would not be possible if there is no prayer from all beloved people. Firstly, my sincere gratitude goes to my advisor, Dr. Hj. Syafiyah, M.A. and my college advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pardes Zeitschrift Der Vereinigung Für Jüdische Studien E
    PaRDeS Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (2019) Heft 25 Universitätsverlag Potsdam PaRDeS Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. / Journal of the German Association for Jewish Studies Transformative Translations in Jewish History and Culture (2019) Heft 25 Universitätsverlag Potsdam Z I O N I S M T O A U T H O R H R R A M T T R A N S F O R M A T I V E H S H L U E B A B E L F I S H R N T E T R A N S L A T I O N S E R K A F K A E D Y B I N J E W I S H H I S T O R Y H E B R E W R S I N H D J A N D C U L T U R E D A A R I M F T R S S I F R U T S E P T U A G I N T H N I V A U S Y N M H S I L G N E A M K O R A H P A R D E S H N M O R O C C A N A C E M E T E R I E S PaRDeS Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. / Journal of the German Association for Jewish Studies Herausgegeben von Markus Krah, Mirjam Thulin und Bianca Pick (Rezensionen) für die Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien in Verbindung mit dem Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft der Universität Potsdam Transformative Translations in Jewish History and Culture (2019) Heft 25 Universitätsverlag Potsdam ISSN (print) 1614-6492 ISSN (online) 1862-7684 ISBN 978-3-86956-468-5 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibli- ografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvesting and Understanding On-Line Neologisms Tony Veale, Cristina
    Harvesting and understanding on-line neologisms Tony Veale, Cristina Butnariu 1. Introduction Language is a dynamic landscape in which words are not fixed land- marks, but unstable signposts that switch directions as archaic senses are lost and new, more topical senses are gained. Frequently, entirely new lexical signposts are added as newly minted word forms enter the lan- guage. Some of these new forms are cut from whole cloth and have their origins in creative writing, movies or games. But many are patchwork creations whose origins can be traced to a blend of existing word forms (Dent 2003). This latter type of neologism is of particular interest to the computational lexicographer, since such words possess an obviously compositional structure from which one can begin to infer meaning. In this chapter, we demonstrate that, if given enough semantic context, an automated system can assign a sufficiently rich semantic structure to these words to allow them to be automatically added to an electronic dictionary like WordNet (Miller 1995). When tied to a system for har- vesting new word forms from the internet, this capability allows for a dynamic dictionary that expands itself in response to a changing lan- guage and cultural context. Most neologisms bubble beneath the surface of widespread usage be- fore they gain entry to a conventional dictionary. This is to be ex- pected, since the internet is awash with idiosyncratic neologisms that lack both charm and staying power. Nonetheless, to experience the va- riety and inventiveness of the most creative new words in English, one need look no further than Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org), an open- source electronic encyclopedia that is continuously updated by an on- line community of volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleventh International Scientific Conference KNOWLEDGE in PRACTICE 16-18 December,2016 Bansko, Bulgaria PORTMANTEAU WORDS in ENGLISH
    Eleventh International Scientific Conference KNOWLEDGE IN PRACTICE 16-18 December,2016 Bansko, Bulgaria PORTMANTEAU WORDS IN ENGLISH Sanel Hadžiahmetović Jurida, PhD University of Tuzla, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of English Language and Literature – Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Abstract: Languages behave like living organisms, they are created, they live through their own use, and moreover they grow. The growth of a language is indicated by way of numerous processes that occur in it, one of which is word formation. People influence the lexicon of their language in various ways. Sometimes it is the bare necessity that compels us to form new words, other times it is purely accidental. Even though words appear and disappear, the English lexicon retained its present size, in part, due to the creation of new words on the basis of the ones that already exist. Presently, the development of science and technology, and consequently, the Internet brings about a high rate of lexical expansion. This phenomenon is reflected in the changes of vocabulary through creation of new specialized terminology. In any case, newly coined words help people successfully conduct their every day responsibilities as well as leisure time. One manner in which new words are created, chiefly popularised by Lewis Carroll in the 19th century, is blending two words to form a new one, also known as portmanteau. Portmanteau is a word that is familiar to luggage enthusiasts; moreover, it is a word familiar to language enthusiasts as well. Innovative and entertaining, these portmanteau words are ubiquitous in advertising, newspapers, or media.
    [Show full text]
  • Blending, from English to Arabic
    Blending, from English to Arabic Blending, from English to Arabic By Ekhlas Ali Mohsin Blending, from English to Arabic By Ekhlas Ali Mohsin This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by Ekhlas Ali Mohsin All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6930-6 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6930-0 To My Great Family TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .............................................................................................. x List of Figures.......................................................................................... xiv List of Abbreviations ................................................................................ xv Preface ..................................................................................................... xvi 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1. Preliminaries .................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. Overview of Blending in English .......................................... 4 1.1.2. Overview of Blending in Arabic ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lexis, 14 | 2019, « Blending in English » [Online], Online Since 01 December 2019, Connection on 14 December 2020
    Lexis Journal in English Lexicology 14 | 2019 Blending in English L'amalgamation en anglais Isabel BALTEIRO and Laurie BAUER (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/1249 DOI: 10.4000/lexis.1249 ISSN: 1951-6215 Publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 Electronic reference Isabel BALTEIRO and Laurie BAUER (dir.), Lexis, 14 | 2019, « Blending in English » [Online], Online since 01 December 2019, connection on 14 December 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/ 1249 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.1249 This text was automatically generated on 14 December 2020. Lexis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 1 The e-journal Lexis published its 14th issue, devoted to “Blending in English”, in December 2019. La revue électronique Lexis - revue de lexicologie anglaise a mis en ligne son numéro 14 en décembre 2019. Celui-ci est consacré à l'« amalgamation en anglais ». Lexis, 14 | 2019 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Isabel Balteiro and Laurie Bauer Papers Blending creativity and productivity: on the issue of delimiting the boundaries of blends as a type of word formation Natalia Beliaeva Improving on observational blends research: regression modeling in the study of experimentally-elicited blends Stefanie Wulff and Stefan Th. Gries A corpus-based analysis of new English blends Mattiello Elisa Variable base-word positioning in English blends Aviv Schoenfeld, Evan Gary Cohen and Outi Bat‑El A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’
    [Show full text]
  • Elisa Mattiello
    DOI: 10.26346/1120-2726-165 Blends vis-à-vis compounds in English Elisa Mattiello University of Pisa, Italy <[email protected]> This paper analyses blending and compounding from the viewpoint of their regularity, predictability, and grammaticalness. Like mixtures and compounds in chemistry, these two word-formation processes are dissimilar in terms of mor- photactic mechanisms employed and morphosemantic patterns involved. While novel compounds are created according to productive word-formation rules, new blends only exhibit regularities and (mutually exclusive) constraints. Yet, unlike other extra-grammatical abbreviatory mechanisms, such as acronyms or clippings (including clipped compounds), blending creates new words for novel objects or concepts. Hence, it deserves attention and needs to be included in a morphological description of the English language. The aims of this study are: (a) to distinguish blends from compounds in formal and semantic terms and (b) to identify degrees of predictability and grammaticalness for blend formation. Results show that the AD (i.e. initial part of Source Word1 + final part of Source Word2) overlapping type of blends is preferred over the AC (i.e. initial part of both Source Word1 and Source Word2) type: in AD-forms, D can also become a frequent splinter and form productive series. This is a further confirmation of the differentiation between blends and clipped compounds, which, in spite of their AC form, are not productive. By contrast, semantically, blends are as compositional as coordinate or attributive compounds, but often display a lower degree of opacity. Finally, blend names are commonly used to designate hybrid mixtures, whereas compound names are given to chemical compounds according to the chemical nomenclature set of rules developed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking Contemporary English Blends: Morphological Structure, Meaning, Processing
    Unpacking contemporary English blends: Morphological structure, meaning, processing by Natalia Beliaeva A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington (2014) Abstract It is not coincidental that blend words (e. g. nutriceutical ← nutricious + pharmaceutical, blizzaster ← blizzard + disaster) are more and more often used in media sources. In a blend, two (or sometimes more) words become one compact and attention-catching form, which is at the same time relatively transparent, so that the reader or listener can still recognise several constituents in it. These features make blends one of the most intriguing types of word formation. At the same time, blends are extremely challenging to study. A classical morpheme-based morphological description is not suitable for blends because their formation does not involve morphemes as such. This implies two possible approaches: either to deny blends a place in regular morphology (as suggested in Dressler (2000), for example), or to find grounds for including them into general morphological descriptions and theories (as was done, using different frameworks, in López Rúa (2004b), Gries (2012), Arndt-Lappe and Plag (2013) and other studies). The growing number of blends observed in various media sources indicates that this phenomenon is an important characteristic of the living contemporary language, and therefore, blends cannot be ignored in a morphological description of the English language (and many other typologically different languages). Moreover, I believe that the general morphological theory has to embrace blends because of the vast amount of regularity observed in their formation, despite their incredible diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of English Loanwords in Chinese Through Chinese Newswriting
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1983 A Study of English Loanwords in Chinese through Chinese Newswriting Wendy Yeun-wen Pao Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Pao, Wendy Yeun-wen, "A Study of English Loanwords in Chinese through Chinese Newswriting" (1983). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5749. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/5749 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • A STUDY OF ENGLISH LOANWORDS IN CHINESE THROUGH CHINESE NEWSWRITING BY WENDY YEUN-WEN PAO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts, Major in Speech, South Dakota State University 1983 A STUDY OF ENGLISH LOANWORDS IN CHINESE THROUGH CHINESE NEWSWRITING This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the degree, Master of Arts, and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this thesis does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Juditf1?Zivanovic Date Thesis Adviser Judith z&a,novic Date ad, Department of Speech ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I sincerely express my appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Judith Zivanovic, for her constant assistance and helpful instruction throughout this study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Student of Jewish Languages Reads Michał Németh's
    Almanach Karaimski A Student of Jewish Languages Reads Michał Németh’s Unknown Lutsk Karaim Letters in Hebrew Script (19th–20th Centuries). A Critical Edition David L. Gold (New York) Summary: The Karaite language has justifiedly attracted the atten- tion of Turkologists though it should also be of interest to students of Jewish languages (= the languages of Rabbanite and Karaite Jews); and what students of Jewish languages have to say about it should interest Turkologists, just as what the latter have to say should inter- est the former.. By looking at Karaite (as exemplified in Michał Németh’s Unknown Lutsk Karaim Letters in Hebrew Script (19th–20th Centuries): A Critical Edition) from the viewpoint of other Jewish languages, researchers can: 1. Add new questions to the agenda of Karaite research. For example, the existence of an idiosyncratic type of periphrastic verb in at least Karaite, Judezmo, Yidish, and Ultra-Orthodox Ashkenazic English prompts the question of what the genetic relationships between the tokens of that type are. 2. Reopen old questions. synagog’, with phonological variants, comes from Arabic. The author proposes a different etymology (possibly not original with him) , involving only Jewish languages (a more ap- propriate derivation for a Karaite word having that meaning), which takes the Karaite word back to Hebrew and/or to Jewish Aramaic. Keywords: Hebrew-Aramaic, Jewish intralinguistics, Karaite, Slavic lan- guages, Yidish Almanach Karaimski 6 2017 str. 17–118 18 David L. Gold Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Jewish intralinguistics III. The tree model of evolution of human language is unsuitable for all Jewish languages except, possibly, the first one IV.
    [Show full text]