DOCSLIB.ORG

Unpacking Contemporary English Blends: Morphological Structure, Meaning, Processing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Unpacking contemporary English blends: Morphological structure, meaning, processing by Natalia Beliaeva A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington (2014) Abstract It is not coincidental that blend words (e. g. nutriceutical ← nutricious + pharmaceutical, blizzaster ← blizzard + disaster) are more and more often used in media sources. In a blend, two (or sometimes more) words become one compact and attention-catching form, which is at the same time relatively transparent, so that the reader or listener can still recognise several constituents in it. These features make blends one of the most intriguing types of word formation. At the same time, blends are extremely challenging to study. A classical morpheme-based morphological description is not suitable for blends because their formation does not involve morphemes as such. This implies two possible approaches: either to deny blends a place in regular morphology (as suggested in Dressler (2000), for example), or to find grounds for including them into general morphological descriptions and theories (as was done, using different frameworks, in López Rúa (2004b), Gries (2012), Arndt-Lappe and Plag (2013) and other studies). The growing number of blends observed in various media sources indicates that this phenomenon is an important characteristic of the living contemporary language, and therefore, blends cannot be ignored in a morphological description of the English language (and many other typologically different languages). Moreover, I believe that the general morphological theory has to embrace blends because of the vast amount of regularity observed in their formation, despite their incredible diversity. The formation of blends involves both addition and subtraction, which relates them both to compounds and to clippings. This research aims to clarify the morphological status of blends in relation to the neighbouring word formation categories, in particular, to the so-called clipping compounds (e.g. digicam ← digital + camera). To approach this problem, I compiled a collection of English neologisms formed by merging two (in some cases, more) words into one, and analysed their formal and semantic properties. The results of this analysis were used to distinguish between blends and clipping compounds, and also to justify the classification of blends according to different degrees of formal transparency (using the principles of Lehrer’s (1996, 2007) classification). The strength of the association between blends (or clipping compounds) and their source words was then assessed in two experiments: an online survey involving evaluating definitions of blends and clipping compounds, and a psycholinguistic experiment involving a production and a lexical decision task. The iii experimental findings show that recognisability of the source words of blends and clipping compounds has significant influence both on the evaluation of their definitions and on their processing. The main implication of the experimental results is that blends, unlike clipping compounds, are closer to compounds than to clippings. In addition to this, significant differences are revealed between blends containing full source words and blends containing only parts of them. Therefore, the structural type of blend, as defined in this study, is a factor which has strong influence on the processing of blends and their source words. iv Acknowledgements This thesis primarily concerns my contribution to the knowledge about blends. This contribution, however, seems tiny in comparison to the amount of knowledge and experience I acquired during my PhD journey. These were given to me by the people who surrounded me at various stages of this project to a much greater extent than taken from books and journals. To all these people, I express my heartfelt gratitude. First of all, I am grateful to my primary supervisor, Professor Laurie Bauer, who did much more for this research project than fulfil his supervisory duties. His friendly support, inspiring feedback, and his genuine interest not only in the formation of blends, but also in my own formation as an independent researcher have been crucial for the progress of this thesis. I am also indebted to my secondary supervisor, Associate Professor Paul Warren, who provided extremely valuable feedback at all the stages of the experimental part of this project, and whose comments on my writing inspired me to address the trickiest aspects of statistical analysis instead of avoiding them. I am further grateful to Dr. Anna Siyanova, who agreed to join the supervisory team when this project was well under way. Her expertise in experimental studies was very valuable for shaping my own experimental methodology. I am also very grateful to her for positive attitude to all aspects of my work, which was vital for getting me through bumps on this road. I would like to add a special thank you to Professor Ingo Plag, who provided stimulating feedback and advice at a crucial stage of my PhD, and who introduced me to the exciting world of statistical analysis in R. I also wish to thank my examiners Prof. Jen Hay, Dr Paula López Rúa and Dr. Carolyn Wilshire for their genuine interest in my work and their insightful comments. I would like to thank all the staff of School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies for being a lively, inspiring and supportive academic community. I also thank the School for providing opportunities to gain teaching experience, and I must confess that I learned at least as much from the courses I worked on as the students did. I am grateful to all the teaching and the administrative staff of SLALS for making life at the School easier in all sorts of ways, from sorting out administrative issues smoothly and almost unnoticeably, to relaxing conversations over innumerable cups of coffee we had together. And, of course, I am sincerely grateful to my fellow PhD students Anna Piasecki, Sharon Marsden, Ewa Kusmierczyk, Kieran File, Keely Kidner, TJ Boutorwick, Deborah Chua and many others, who provided valuable feedback during the exciting sessions of the thesis v group, and who helped make Wellington my second home. A special thanks to Liza Tarasova, for making my landing in New Zealand as soft as it could possibly be. This research project would not have been possible without the financial support of the grant from the Royal Society of New Zealand through its Marsden Fund to Laurie Bauer, and also without the research grants of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Undertaking this research project would be much less exciting and much more solitary without the support of my family and friends both in New Zealand and in Russia. I would like to thank Dr Elena Myagkova, who first inspired my interest in linguistic research, and Dr Vera Pishchalnikova, my mentor and supervisor of the Candidate of Philological Sciences thesis. Words can hardly express my gratitude to my parents for their love and support, and to my husband Aleksandr and my daughter Polina for constantly reminding me there is life outside the PhD. You gave me much more than I could ever give back. Thank you. vi Papers and presentations derived from this research Journal papers: Beliaeva, N. (2014). A study of English blends: From structure to meaning and back again. Word Structure, 7(1), 29–54. Conference presentations: Beliaeva, N. (2012). The chemistry of blends: How people merge words together. Presented at the 2nd Auckland Postgraduate Conference on Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Auckland, June 30. Beliaeva, N. (2012). The power of slanguage: Form and meaning of English blends. Presented at the Data-Rich Approaches to English Morphology, Wellington, July 4–6. Beliaeva, N. (2012). The power of slanguage: Conceptual integration on the word formation level. Presented at the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, London, July 10–12. Beliaeva, N. (2013). From phonology to morphology, from morphology to semantics: A study of English blends. Presented at Morphology and its Interfaces, Lille, September 12–13. vii viii Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... v Papers and presentations derived from this research ................................................................... vii List of tables ................................................................................................................................................... xiii List of figures .................................................................................................................................................. xv Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Background and motivation of the thesis ............................................................................ 1 1.2. Aims of the thesis .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. The structure of the thesis ......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2. The dramality
Recommended publications
  • A Bird's-Eye View of Lexical Blending

    A Bird's-Eye View of Lexical Blending

    Introduction: A bird’s-eye view of lexical blending Vincent Renner, François Maniez, Pierre J. L. Arnaud To cite this version: Vincent Renner, François Maniez, Pierre J. L. Arnaud. Introduction: A bird’s-eye view of lexical blending. Vincent Renner ; François Maniez ; Pierre Arnaud. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, De Gruyter Mouton, pp.1-9, 2012, Trends in Linguistics - Studies and Monographs, 978-3-11-028923-7. hal-00799934 HAL Id: hal-00799934 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00799934 Submitted on 13 Mar 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Introduction: A bird’s-eye view of lexical blending Vincent Renner, François Maniez, and Pierre J.L. Arnaud 1. A brief retrospective view Lexical blends have been popularized in English by the Victorian author Lewis Carroll, who not only elaborated many new formations made up of word fragments, but also pondered on the process of lexical blending in his writings: Well, “slithy” means “lithe and slimy.” “Lithe” is the same as “active.” You see, it’s like a portmanteau – there are two meanings packed up into one word. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865).
  • The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective

    The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective

    Passage2013, 1(2), 35-44 The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective By: Novita Arsillah English Language and Literature Program (E-mail: [email protected] / mobile: +6281312203723) ABSTRACT This study is a historical linguistic investigation entitled The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective which aims to explore the types of sound changes found in Palembang Malay. The investigation uses a historical linguistic comparative method to compare the phonemic and syllabic changes between an ancestral language Standard Malay and its decent language Palembang Malay. Standard Malay refers to the Wilkinson dictionary in 1904. The participants of this study are seven native speakers of Palembang Malay whose ages range from 20 to 40 years old. The data were collected from the voices of the participants that were recorded along group conversations and interviews. This study applies the theoretical framework of sound changes which proposed by Terry Crowley in 1997 and Lily Campbell in 1999. The findings show that there are nine types of sound changes that were found as the results, namely assimilation (42.35%), lenition (20%), sound addition (3.53%), metathesis (1.18%), dissimilation (1.76%), abnormal sound changes (3.53%), split (13.53%), vowel rising (10.59%), and monophthongisation (3.53%). Keywords: Historical linguistics, standard Malay, Palembang Malay, comparative method, sound change, phoneme, syllable. 35 Novita Arsillah The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective INTRODUCTION spelling system in this study since it is considered to be the first Malay spelling This study classifies into the system that is used widely in Malaya, field of historical linguistics that Singapore, and Brunei (Omar, 1989).
  • A Neural Network Ensemble Model for Lexical Blends

    A Neural Network Ensemble Model for Lexical Blends

    Neuramanteau: A Neural Network Ensemble Model for Lexical Blends Kollol Das Shaona Ghosh [email protected] [email protected] Independent Researcher University of Cambridge Bangalore, India Department of Engineering, Cambridge, UK Word1 Word2 Blend Structure Category Coverage Abstract aviation electronics avionics avi-onics Prefix + Suffix 16.74% communicate fake communifake communi-fake Prefix + Word 10.78% speak typo speako speak-o Word + Letter 0.14% The problem of blend formation in genera- west indiea windies w-indies Letter + Word 0.89% point broadcast pointcast point-cast Word + Suffix 22.56% tive linguistics is interesting in the context scientific fiction scientifiction scienti-fic-tion Word + Word overlap 22.56% of neologism, their quick adoption in mod- affluence influenza affluenza af-fluen-za Prefix + Suffix overlap 13.98% brad angelina brangelina br-a-ngelina Prefix + Word overlap 11.39% ern life and the creative generative pro- subvert advertising subvertising sub-vert-ising Word + Suffix overlap 16.31% cess guiding their formation. Blend qual- Table 1: Sample blends in our dataset along with the type ity depends on multitude of factors with and coverage. There are other types of rare blends that is high degrees of uncertainty. In this work, beyond the scope of this work. we investigate if the modern neural net- work models can sufficiently capture and recognize the creative blend composition blending systems include generating names of process. We propose recurrent neural net- products, brands, businesses and advertisements to work sequence-to-sequence models, that name a few especially if coupled with contextual are evaluated on multiple blend datasets information about the business or sector.
  • Web 2.0 Storytellingemergence of a New Genre by Bryan Alexander and Alan Levine

    Web 2.0 Storytellingemergence of a New Genre by Bryan Alexander and Alan Levine

    Teaching and Learning Web 2.0 StorytellingEmergence of a New Genre By Bryan Alexander and Alan Levine story has a beginning, a middle, and a cleanly wrapped-up end- ing. Whether told around a campfire, read from a book, or played on a DVD, a story goes from point A to B and then C. It follows a trajectory, a Freytag Pyramid—perhaps the line of a human life or the stages of the hero’s journey. A story is told by one person or by a creative team to an audience that is usually quiet, even receptive. Or at least that’s what a story used to be, and that’s how a story used to be told. Today, with digital net- Aworks and social media, this pattern is changing. Stories now are open-ended, branching, hyperlinked, cross-media, participatory, exploratory, and unpre- dictable. And they are told in new ways: Web 2.0 storytelling picks up these new types of stories and runs with them, accelerating the pace of creation and participation while revealing new directions for narratives to flow. Bryan Alexander is Director of Research at the National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education (NITLE, http:// nitle.org). He blogs at <http://b2e.nitle.org/>. Alan Levine is Vice President, Community, and Chief Technology Officer for the New Media Consortium (NMC). He barks about technology at <http://cogdog blog.com>. 40 EDUCAUSE r e v i e w - November/December 2008 © 2008 Bryan Alexander and Alan Levine Illustration by David Lesh, © 2008 Definitions and Histories such as Dreamweaver, an arcane method connections in between.
  • Blogs and the Narrativity of Experience

    Blogs and the Narrativity of Experience

    Blogs and the Narrativity of Experience José Ángel García Landa Universidad de Zaragoza [email protected] http://www.garcialanda.net Blogs and the Narrativity of Experience This paper undertakes an analysis of the narrativity of a form of discourse which has appeared recently (blogs) within the framework of an emergentist theory of narrativity and its discursive modes. The narrative/discursive characteristics of blogs emerge from a preexistent ground of more basic or less specific communicative practices; and narrative discursivity itself is an emergent phenomenon with respect to other cognitive and experiential phenomena. A number of formal and communicative characteristics of blog writing and of the blogosphere are discussed as emergent modes of experience within the pragmatic context of computer-mediated communication. _________________ 1 We shall undertake an analysis of the narrativity proper to a discursive form of recent appearance, weblogs or blogs, within the framework of an emergentist theory of narrativity and of its discursive modes. The narrative- discursive characteristics of blogs emerge from a prior basis of simpler or less specific communicative practices. And the narrativity of discourse is itself an emergent phenomenon with respect to other cognitive and experiential phenomena which necessarily underpin it, and are the basis on which its emergent nature must be defined. That is to say, there must be processes first, in order for processual representations to exist, and these representations must exist in simple forms before they give rise to complex narrative forms, associated to specific cultural and communicational contexts—for instance, the development of computer-mediated communicative interaction on the Web. Processes - Representations - Narratives - Narratologies Let us begin with absolute generality—with the narrativity of experience itself, situating narratives, and narratology, within an emergentist/evolutionary theory of reality.
  • Speech Error Expressions in Maliki National Debate Tournament (Mandate) 2015

    Speech Error Expressions in Maliki National Debate Tournament (Mandate) 2015

    SPEECH ERROR EXPRESSIONS IN MALIKI NATIONAL DEBATE TOURNAMENT (MANDATE) 2015 THESIS By: MUHAMMAD RYDZKY MUHAMMAD ALI NIM 12320079 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES THE ISLAMIC STATE UNIVERSITY MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2017 SPEECH ERROR EXPRESSIONS IN MALIKI NATIONAL DEBATE TOURNAMENT (MANDATE) 2015 THESIS Presented to Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra (S.S) By: MUHAMMAD RYDZKY MUHAMMAD ALI NIM 12320079 Advisor Dr. ROHMANI NUR INDAH, M.Pd. NIP 19760910 200312 2 003 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES THE ISLAMIC STATE UNIVERSITY MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2017 i ii iv v MOTTO قَا َل َر ِّب ا ْش َر ْح لِي َص ْد ِري )52( َويَ ِّس ْر لِي أَ ْم ِري )52( َوا ْحلُ ْل ُع ْق َدةً ِم ْن لِ َسانِي )52( يَ ْفقَهُوا قَ ْولِي )52 Musa said, "Allah, expand for me my breast [with assurance], and ease for me my task, and untie the knot from my tongue, that they may understand my speech. (QS. Thoha: 25-28) vi DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to: My beloved father and mother, Muhammad Ali Hamzah and Abida Yakob Saman. I hope that it could make them proud. It is also for my beloved brother Fitrianto Muhammad Ali and Muhammad Ali Family who always support me. Thank you for my wife, Dian Purwitasari, for helping me finishing this work. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENT All praises are to Allah, who has given power, inspiration, and health in finishing the thesis. All my hopes and wishes are only for him.
  • Accuracy in the Detection of Deception As a Function of Training in the Study of Human Behavior

    Accuracy in the Detection of Deception As a Function of Training in the Study of Human Behavior

    University of Central Florida STARS Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1976 Accuracy in the Detection of Deception as a Function of Training in the Study of Human Behavior Charner Powell Leone University of Central Florida Part of the Communication Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Leone, Charner Powell, "Accuracy in the Detection of Deception as a Function of Training in the Study of Human Behavior" (1976). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 230. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd/230 ACCURACY IN THE DETECTION OF DECEPTION AS A FUNCTION OF TRAINING I N· ·T"H E STU 0 Y 0 F HUMAN BE HA V I 0 R BY CHARNER POWELL LEONE B.S.J., University of Florida, 1967 THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts: Communication in the Graduate Studies Program of the College of Social Sciences Florida Technological University Orlando, Florida 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . i v INTRODUCTION . 1 METHODOLOGY . 12 Subjects . 12 Procedure and Materials . 12 RESULTS . 1 7 DISCUSSION . ~ 26 SUMMARY . 34 APPENDIX A. Questionnaire . 37 APPENDIX 8 • Judge•s Scoresheets . 39 REFERENCES . 44 i i LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page 1 Mean Behaviors Used to Discriminate Lying from Truthful Role Players by Decoder Groups .
  • Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research the Dynamics of Wordplay

    Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research the Dynamics of Wordplay

    Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research The Dynamics of Wordplay Edited by Esme Winter-Froemel Editorial Board Salvatore Attardo, Dirk Delabastita, Dirk Geeraerts, Raymond W. Gibbs, Alain Rabatel, Monika Schmitz-Emans and Deirdre Wilson Volume 6 Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research Edited by Esme Winter-Froemel and Verena Thaler The conference “The Dynamics of Wordplay / La dynamique du jeu de mots – Interdisciplinary perspectives / perspectives interdisciplinaires” (Universität Trier, 29 September – 1st October 2016) and the publication of the present volume were funded by the German Research Founda- tion (DFG) and the University of Trier. Le colloque « The Dynamics of Wordplay / La dynamique du jeu de mots – Interdisciplinary perspectives / perspectives interdisciplinaires » (Universität Trier, 29 septembre – 1er octobre 2016) et la publication de ce volume ont été financés par la Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) et l’Université de Trèves. ISBN 978-3-11-058634-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-058637-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063087-9 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2018955240 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Esme Winter-Froemel and Verena Thaler, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Contents Esme Winter-Froemel, Verena Thaler and Alex Demeulenaere The dynamics of wordplay and wordplay research 1 I New perspectives on the dynamics of wordplay Raymond W.
  • Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew Blends

    Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew Blends

    Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew blends Item Type text; Article Authors Pham, Mike Publisher University of Arizona Linguistics Circle (Tucson, Arizona) Journal Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Theory at the University of Arizona Rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Download date 23/09/2021 10:05:19 Item License Copyright © is held by the author(s). Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/143562 The Coyote Papers 18 (May 2011), University of Arizona Linguistics Department, Tucson, AZ., U.S.A. Idiomatic Root Merge in Modern Hebrew blends Mike Pham University of Chicago [email protected] Keywords Distributed Morphology, blend, idiom, Modern Hebrew, Locality Constraints Abstract In this paper I use the Distributional Morphology framework and semantic Locality Constraints proposed by Arad (2003) to look at category assignments of blends in Modern Hebrew, as well as blends, compounds and idioms in English where relevant. Bat-El (1996) provides an explicit phonological analysis of Modern Hebrew blends, and argues against any morphological process at play in blend formation. I argue, however, that blends and compounds must be accounted for within morphology due to category assignments. I first demonstrate that blends are unquestion- ably formed by blending fully inflected words rather than roots, and then subsequently reject an analysis that accounts for weakened Locality Constraints by proposing the formation of a new root. Instead, I propose a hypothesis of Idiomatic Root Merge where a root can be an n-place predicate that selects at least an XP sister and a category head. This proposal also entails that there is a structural difference between two surface-similar phrases that have respectively literal and idiomatic meanings.1 1 Introduction Blending is a word-formation process that is highly productive in certain languages, such as Modern Hebrew and English, and much like compounding, involves combining multiple words into a form that behaves as a single syntactic and semantic unit.
  • Local Identity and Sound Change in Glasgow a Pilot Study1

    Local Identity and Sound Change in Glasgow a Pilot Study1

    Local identity and sound change in Glasgow A pilot study1 Natalie Braber2 Zoe Butterfint3 Abstract This paper outlines a pilot study investigation into the potential link between local identity and language change in Glasgow. Results are presented from part of the pilot study, specifically the variation noted in two phonological variables - the realisation of the alveolar lateral approximant /l/, and the occurrence of so-called T-glottalling - and are discussed in the light of local identity. Glasgow is historically a heavily stigmatised, often stereotyped city and home to an equally stigmatised linguistic variety: Glaswegian. Recent investigations have highlighted processes of linguistic change occurring in this linguistic variety (most notable Stuart-Smith, 1999a, 2003; Stuart-Smith et al., 2006, 2007), and this study sets out to investigate the potential link between these changes, speaker attitudes to Glasgow and their sense of Glaswegian identity. The data elicitation method employed is an extended version of that used by Stuart- Smith & Tweedie (2000): semi-structured interviews supplemented by a read word list. Methodological issues and considerations for future investigation are discussed on the basis of the findings of this pilot study. 1. Introduction A wealth of literature exists examining the relationship between identity and linguistic change, from Labov’s pioneering investigation in Martha’s Vineyard (1963), to present-day research in Middlesborough (Llamas, 1999, 2007) and Berwick-upon- Tweed (Pichler & Watt. 2004; Pichler, Watt and Llamas, 2004). This paper discusses findings from a small-scale pilot study carried out in 2005/6, which aimed to extend that body of work, further investigating the complex ‘interdependence of language and place identity’ (Llamas, 2007:579) in one very specific locale: Glasgow.
  • Submorphemic Elements in the Formation of Acronyms, Blends and Clippings

    Submorphemic Elements in the Formation of Acronyms, Blends and Clippings

    Lexis Journal in English Lexicology 2 | 2008 Lexical Submorphemics Submorphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and clippings Ingrid Fandrych Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/713 DOI: 10.4000/lexis.713 ISSN: 1951-6215 Publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 Electronic reference Ingrid Fandrych, « Submorphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and clippings », Lexis [Online], 2 | 2008, Online since 10 November 2008, connection on 01 May 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/lexis/713 ; DOI : 10.4000/lexis.713 Lexis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Lexis 2 : Lexical Submophemics / La submorphémique lexicale 103 Submorphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and clippings10 Ingrid Fandrych108 Abstract Mainstream word.formation is concerned with the formation of new words from morphemes. As morphemes are full linguistic signs, the resulting neologisms are transparent: spea5ers can deduce the meanings of the new formations from the meanings of their constituents. Thus, morphematic word.formation processes can be analysed in terms of their modifier/head relationship, with A Z B 4 AB, and AB o 8a 5ind of) B. This pattern applies to compounding and affixation. There are, however, certain word.formation processes that are not morpheme. based and that do not have a modifier/head structure. Acronyms li5e NATO are formed from the initial letters of word groupsj blends li5e motel -mix/ or conflate submorphemic elementsj clippings li5e prof shorten existing words. In order to analyse these word.formation processes, we need concepts below the morpheme level. This paper will analyse the role played by elements below the morpheme level in the production of these non.morphematic word.formation processes which have been particularly productive in the English language since the second half of the 20th century.
  • How to Write Best-Selling Fiction

    How to Write Best-Selling Fiction

    kfajs aslkjf;laskjfa;lkesfhj kfajs aslkjf;laskjfa;lkesfhj kfajs aslkjf;laskjfa;lkesfhj Topic Subtopic kfajs aslkjf;laskjfa;lkesfhj. Literature & Language Writing How to Write Best-Selling Fiction Write to How “Pure intellectual stimulation that can be popped into the [audio or video player] anytime.” How to Write —Harvard Magazine “Passionate, erudite, living legend lecturers. Academia’s best lecturers are being captured on tape.” Best-Selling Fiction —The Los Angeles Times Course Guidebook “A serious force in American education.” —The Wall Street Journal James Scott Bell Novelist and Writing Instructor James Scott Bell is an award-winning novelist and writing instructor. He is a winner of the International Thriller Writers Award and the author of a best-selling book on writing, Plot & Structure: Techniques and Exercises for Crafting a Plot That Grips Readers from Start to Finish. He is also the author of numerous novels. Mr. Bell has taught novel writing at Pepperdine University as well as in writing seminars across the United States and many parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom. THE GREAT COURSES® Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, VA 20151-2299 USA Guidebook Phone: 1-800-832-2412 www.thegreatcourses.com Professor Photo: © Jeff Mauritzen - inPhotograph.com. Cover Image: © Need Image Credit.. Course No. 2533 © 2019 The Teaching Company. PB2533A Published by THE GREAT COURSES Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard | Suite 500 | Chantilly, Virginia | 20151‑2299 [phone] 1.800.832.2412 | [fax] 703.378.3819 | [web] www.thegreatcourses.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 2019 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright.