Design 2030: Practice Diid Index Disegno Industriale | Industrial Design Journal Published Every Four Months
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Design has been recognized as a discipline of doing. Its practical dimension has always exceeded the theoretical one, and the second has always placed the first at the centre. If this assumed a connotation of certainty in the context of the 20th century, today, in the contemporary world, is the Design Design dimension of doing still valid? How the applied dimension of this knowledge has to be expressed? Can the “profession” of the designer specialized in product categories still valid? What space will it occupy between the professions 2030: of the future? What should be its relationship with production and consumption systems? The issue 72 of diid opens up to those applied experiments where Design, within the laboratories and in the places of production, is outlining a different Practice nature and prefigures a new role in and for society. Design 2030: Design Loredana Di Lucchio, Lorenzo Imbesi, Sabrina Lucibello Practice Alberto Bassi, Patrizia Bolzan, Daria Casciani, Mariana Ciancia, Andrea Coccia, Giovanni Maria Conti, Michele De Chirico, Barbara Del Curto, Loredana Di Lucchio, Venere Ferraro, Gian Andrea Giacobone, Angela Giambattista, 72/20 Slivia Imbesi, Giovanni Innella, Sarvpriya Raj Kumar, Giuseppe Losco, Sabrina Lucibello, Viktor Malakuczi, Michele Marchi, Giuseppe Mincolelli, Maurizio Montalti, Martina Motta, Davide Paciotti, Flavia Papile, Francesca Piredda, Gabriele Pontillo, Marco Ronchi, Maria Antonietta Sbordone, Chiara Scarpitti, Manuel Scortichini, Carlo Emilio Standoli, Mila Stepanovic, Carlo Vinti, Design 2030: Practice diid Index disegno industriale | industrial design Journal published every four months Fondata da | Founded by Tonino Paris Editorial Registration at Tribunale di Roma 86/2002 in the 6th of March 2002 Design 2030: feasible practices for the next future > Tonino Paris 4 N°72/20 Think Design 2030: Practice A sense of time for design > Alberto Bassi 8 Resilient Professions. When Design practices become responsible ISSN > Loredana Di Lucchio, Angela Giambattista 18 1594-8528 Beyond human – new Paradigms of active collaboration in Design ISBN > Sabrina Lucibello, Maurizio Montalti 26 9788832080506 The value of design practices in scientific research: 5 paradoxes Anno | Year > Giovanni Innella, Chiara Scarpitti 34 XVII The fifth dimension of interaction design: conversation with Gillian Crampton Smith and Alessandro Masserdotti > Giuseppe Losco, Davide Paciotti, Direttore | Editorial Director Manuel Scortichini, Carlo Vinti 42 Tonino Paris Comitato Direttivo | Editors Board Think gallery > Design 2030: People, Users, Designers > Luca D’Elia 50 Mario Buono, Loredana Di Lucchio, Lorenzo Imbesi, Francesca La Rocca, Giuseppe Losco, Sabrina Lucibello Comitato Scientifico | Scientific Board Make Mariana Amatullo, Vice Provost, Global Strategic Initiatives Parsons School of Design, (USA) Focused practices for future changes > Giovanni Maria Conti, Martina Motta 70 Andrea Branzi, Emeritus Professor, Politecnico di Milano, (Italy) New places of design: nomadic workshops > Michele De Chirico 80 Flaviano Celaschi, Full Professor, Università degli Studi di Bologna “Alma Mater”, (Italy) Dijon De Moraes, University Rector, Estado de Minas Gerai, (Brazil) Prototype-Driven Design in the IoT Age > Giuseppe Mincolelli, Michele Marchi, Giuseppe Furlanis, President, Consiglio Nazionale per l’Alta Formazione Artistica e Musicale, (Italy) Silvia Imbesi, Gian Andrea Giacobone 88 Sebastián García Garrido, Professor, Universidad de Málaga, (Spain) Avant-garde CAD: Generative Design > Sarvpriya Raj Kumar, Viktor Malakuczi 96 Claudio Germak, Full Professor, Politecnico di Torino, (Italy) Christian Guellerin, Executive Director, L’École de design Nantes Atlantique, (France) Design Interstitial practices > Carlo Emilio Standoli, Daria Casciani, Patrizia Bolzan 104 Stefano Marzano, Founding DEAN, THNK School of Creative Leadership, (Netherlands) Fernando Moreira da Silva, Full Professor, Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal) Make gallery > Design 2030: Thinking, Tinkering, Thinkering > Carmen Rotondi 112 Raquel Pelta, Professor, Universidad de Barcelona (Spain) Bruno Siciliano, Full Professor, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, (Italy) Francesca Tosi, Full Professor, Università degli Studi di Firenze, (Italy) Focus AI, Design Fiction, and Critical Thinking > Venere Ferraro, Mila Stepanovic 128 Comitato Editoriale | Editorial Advisory Board Luca Bradini, Sonia Capece, Carla Farina, Andrea Lupacchini, Enza Migliore, Federico Oppedisano, Designer Pollinator: a case study > Flavia Papile, Andrea Coccia, Barbara Del Curto 136 Lucia Pietroni, Chiara Scarpitti, Carlo Vannicola, Carlo Vinti Design Practice for Transformation > Marco Ronchi, Mariana Ciancia, Francesca Piredda 144 Redazione Roma | Editorial Staff Luca D’Elia, Paride Duello, Carmen Rotondi Design and different ways of “doing” technologies > Maria Antonietta Sbordone, Gabriele Pontillo 152 Caporedattore | Editor In-Chief Carla Farina Focus gallery > Design 2030: Spaces, Factories, Labs > Paride Duello 162 Progetto grafico | Graphic Layout Marc Sánchez (Blacklist Creative) Curatore | Guest Editor diid 72 Loredana Di Lucchio, Lorenzo Imbesi, Sabrina Lucibello Editorial Design 2030: feasible practices for the next future Tonino Paris Emeritus Professor, Sapienza University of Rome > [email protected] Design, born as a discipline of “doing”, has enhanced its theoretical dimension, way, Raj Kumar and Malakuczi describe how Generative Design, within the evolu- passing through its disruptive practical dimension. tionary path of CAD, outlining new directions such as topological optimization, In this issue, the aim is to investigate and verify whether this assumption is still valid morphogenesis and biomimicry”, requires not only new technical knowledge, but or whether the theoretical dimension has gone beyond the experimental one. also more flexible approaches. What skills will be required to the Designers of the next future? What should be the Also the paper of Stando, Casciani and Bolzan proposes “a projective reading of relationship within Design and the systems of production and consumption? And, the contribution of Design as a holistic discipline in the redefinition of materializa- above all, could we still call the operators of Design “designers”? tion and production processes” between Digital Fabrication and Growing Materials, These are just some of the questions that the proposed papers attempt to answer. as interstitial practices, but at the same time central to design; while the paper of Mincolelli, Marchi, Imbesi and Giacobone underline how “the complexity triggered The contribution of Bassi opens the session “Think”, inviting to shift the point of by the development of increasingly interoperable and intelligent objects is determining view from the “possibilities of doing” in search of the “meaning of doing” and, even new dynamics of use and interaction between man and artefact” actually requires a more, moving from the logic of “being able to do” to the logic of “knowing how to rethinking of prototyping methodologies and practices. do”. This paper promotes a” pro-adaptive” or “pro-active” design, that can act “in Finally, the paper of De Chirico offers a reflection on “design as training, research relation to the changing and transitive conditions of products, systems and services”, and work” and theorizes about new practices and new places where the nature of and that can elaborate not a “solution” but “multiple solutions”. designer is defined in relation to the relationships between universities, research In the other papers, the protagonists of design open a critical reflection with those and small businesses. involved in research and training. In the first paper two design teams, Forma Fantasma and Joe Velluto, tell about In the last of the three sections, “Focus”, thanks to a more critical reportage of some their slow and resilient design, that is able to rethink the nowadays life with “ideas research experience, a highlight on some key concepts about the Design for the next as objects” future is offered. Then, Giovanni Iannella and Chiara Scarpitti tell about their “active” to marge In the paper of Ferraro and Stepanovic AI is considered one of the most relevant research and design, convinced that is the only possible way for the next future, but topics, not only for the Computer Science, but also within the Design community, finding within this relationship 5 different paradoxes. starting from the Interaction Design. In the paper of Ronchi, Ciancia and Piredda, the Maurizio Montalti of Officina Corpuscoli, proposes new paradigms of collaboration reflection moves towards on the “role of design in the evolution of processes that can in between Design and Science, where the innovation drawings inspiration from the become human-driven, starting from experiences and good practices of collaboration Natural Systems, but in any case, where the Design attitude of “make” is fundamental with companies and the integration of disciplines such as Design and Mangement in comparison with the other disciplines. in the development of a digital and cultural and design-oriented transformation “. Finally, with the work of Gillian Crampton Smith and Alessandro Masserdotti, a The “pollinator designer” is the “prototype” of a contemporary designer described in reflection on the presents and future of the Interaction Design is opened within the the paper of Papile, Coccia and Del Curto, in the experience made on the subject of the contemporary scenario increasingly