DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Requirement for Designation of a Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Requirement for Designation of a Road FORM 18 NOTICE OF A REQUIREMENT BY REQUIRING AUTHORITY FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 Prepared for Auckland Transport By GHD Limited P O Box 6543 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 November 2012 1 Contents 1. The Sites to Which The Notice of Requirement Applies ................................................. 4 2. The Nature of the Proposed Public Work ....................................................................... 6 3. Conditions Relating To This Notice of Requirement ....................................................... 8 4. Potential Effects that the Public Work will have on the Environment, and the ways in which any adverse effects will be Mitigated ......................................................................... 11 4.1. Traffic Network, Access and Parking..................................................................... 11 4.2. Visual, Shading and Privacy Effects ...................................................................... 11 4.3. Tree and vegetation Removal ............................................................................... 14 4.4. Noise Effects......................................................................................................... 15 4.5. Stormwater Effects................................................................................................ 16 4.6. Construction Related Effects ................................................................................. 16 4.7. Safety ................................................................................................................... 17 4.8. Earthworks ............................................................................................................ 17 4.9. Archaeological and Heritage Assessment ............................................................. 18 4.10. Ecological Effects .............................................................................................. 18 4.11. Conclusion to Potential Effects Section ............................................................. 19 5. Alternative Routes, Route Infrastructure (Sites) and Methods ...................................... 19 5.1. Alternative Routes................................................................................................. 19 5.2. Development of Northside Drive ........................................................................... 20 5.3. Alternative Methods .............................................................................................. 21 6. The Public Work and Designation are Reasonably Necessary for Achieving the Objectives of the Requiring Authority .................................................................................. 21 7. Strategic Context ......................................................................................................... 22 Walking and Cycling ........................................................................................................ 23 8. Resource Consents that are Needed ........................................................................... 24 8.1. Resource Consents Required ............................................................................... 24 8.2. Auckland Regional Plan: Sediment Control ........................................................... 25 8.3. Auckland Regional Plan: Air Land and Water........................................................ 25 8.4. National Environmental Standard for Assessment and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health .......................................................................................... 25 8.5. Outline Plan of Works ........................................................................................... 26 9. Consultation ................................................................................................................. 26 10. Information Required by the District Plan, Regional Plan or any Regulations Made Under the Resource Management Act 1991 ....................................................................... 27 10.1. Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section) 2003 .................................. 27 10.1.1. Objectives and Policies of the District Plan ................................................. 27 10.1.2. Relevant District Plan Rules ....................................................................... 28 11. Further Information ................................................................................................... 28 12. National Legislation and Policy ................................................................................. 29 12.1. The Resource Management Act 1991 ............................................................... 29 12.2. The Land Transport Management Act 2003 ...................................................... 30 12.3. The New Zealand Transport Strategy 2008 ....................................................... 30 12.4. Regional Policy.................................................................................................. 30 12.4.1. Auckland Regional Policy Statement .......................................................... 30 12.4.2. Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2010 ......................................... 32 12.4.3. Auckland Transport Plan 2009 ....................................................................... 33 12.4.4. Auckland City Council Policy ...................................................................... 33 Waitakere City Freight Plan: Freight Management Plan 2009-2040 Consultation Draft 33 13. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 34 Appendix A: Landtake Plans ............................................................................................... 36 2 Appendix B: Designation Plans ........................................................................................... 37 Appendix C: Certificates of Title .......................................................................................... 38 Appendix D: Waitakere District Plan Reference: Designations Appendix ............................ 39 Appendix E: Traffic Assessment and Construction Management Plan ................................ 42 Appendix F: Plan Change 15 Massey North Urban Concept Plan ....................................... 43 Appendix G: Northside Drive East Layout and Construction Plans ...................................... 44 Appendix H: Acoustic Report .............................................................................................. 45 Appendix I: Aerial Photograph With Sites and State Highway Location ............................... 46 Appendix J: Arborist Report ................................................................................................ 47 Appendix K: Stormwater and Erosion and Sediment Control............................................... 48 Appendix L: Background Memo .......................................................................................... 49 Appendix M: Landowner Letter ........................................................................................... 50 Appendix N: Waitakere City District Plan Relevant Objectives and Policies ........................ 51 Appendix O: District Plan Assessment Criteria .................................................................... 54 Appendix P: Soil Contamination Report ............................................................................. 55 Appendix Q: October 2009 Waitakere City Freight Plan: Freight Management Plan 2009- 2040 Consultation Draft ...................................................................................................... 56 3 To: Auckland Council Private Bag 92300 Victoria Street Auckland 1142 Attn: The Chief Executive Auckland Transport (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) gives Notice of Requirement (Notice) under section 168 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) for a designation in the Auckland District Plan (Waitakere Section 2003) in respect of a Project for roading purposes applying to land between the new SH 16 North - western motorway and Trig Road. The land will be used for the construction and maintenance of a new road, being Northside Drive (East)1. The land directly affected by the Notice is set out in Appendix A attached to this Notice. 1. The Sites to Which The Notice of Requirement Applies The sites are identified in Appendix A and generally are located in an area stretching from the new SH 16 North - western motorway corridor and includes land owned by the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) located to the west of the motorway corridor. The route of the new road extends east from there across private land to connect with Trig Road and totalling some 750m in length by 30m in width. The plan located in Appendix B shows the extent of the proposed designation. NZTA has an existing designation applying to a section of the land over which Northside Drive (East) would cross. The NZTA designation as it currently exists in the Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section 2003) is as follows: LOCATION REF LOCAL PLAN LEGAL DESIGNATED PURPOSE DESCRIPTION State Highways SH 16B NZTA 4 B7, B8, B9, B10, Auckland – Kumeu N/A and SH 18B C7 and C8 Motorway (SH 16) Motorway (SH 18) The NZTA designation will take priority over this Notice of Requirement in accordance with Section 177 of the RMA. 1 Northside Drive (East) is the term applied to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Bus Service Is Changing
    120 Constellation Bus Station Constellation Bus Station Henderson Henderson Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Ratanui St Ratanui St Meadowood Dr Meadowood Dr Unitec Waitakere Unitec Waitakere Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd Tableau Place walkway Tableau Place walkway Mt Lebanon Lane Mt Lebanon Lane Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd North Shore Trias Rd Trias Rd Sturges Rd Station Sturges Rd Station Jo Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd Golf Course hn Gl Target Rd Target Rd 114 Swanson Rd 114 Swanson Rd enn Av Elm e Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd o ple Girrahween Dr Girrahween Dr Waitakere College Waitakere College r p by ei rmark Dr e R A Rd P Albany Highway Albany Highway Swanson Rd Swanson Rd d A n Dr Westminster Christian School Westminster Christian School Mihini Rd Mihini Rd io l Rosedale t Albany ba E a Upper Harbour Dr Upper Harbour Dr Swanson Rd Swanson Rd ell L Dene Court Lane Dene Court Lane Universal Drive roundabout Universal Drive roundabout n Junior High Park st av g Rosedale South n Upper Harbour Dr Upper Harbour Dr Don Buck Rd Don Buck Rd ny o e li C J ry Kereru Grove Kereru Grove Sabot Place Sabot Place s l Park d u P Greenhithe Rd Greenhithe Rd RiverheadDon Buck Forest Rd Don Buck Rd h R nipe 175 Greenhithe Rd 175 Greenhithe Rd Helena St Helena St H e ws Rd t r tthe e R L Oak v ul Ma s Greenhithe Rd Greenhithe Rd Don Buck Rd Don Buck Rd au ig A Pa n d S rel Oak Dr S l u Upper Harbour Motorway Upper Harbour Motorway Zita Maria Drive Zita Maria Drive Dr c h l Constellation S c A a h r Greenhithe Rd
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway
    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013
    Te Ture ā-Rohe Marutau ā-Iwi me te Whakapōrearea 2013 Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013 (as at 11 January 2021) made by the Governing Body of Auckland Council in resolution GB/2013/84 on 22 August 2013 Bylaw made under sections 145, 146 and 149 of the Local Government Act 2002 and section 64 of the Health Act 1956. Summary This summary is not part of the Bylaw but explains the general effects. The purpose of this Bylaw is to help people to enjoy Auckland’s public places by – • identifying bad behaviours that must be avoided in public places in clause 6, for example disturbing other people or using an object in a way that is dangerous or causes a nuisance • identifying restricted activities in Schedule 1, for example, fireworks, drones, fences, fires, weapons, storing objects, camping or set netting • enabling the restriction of certain activities and access to public places in clauses 7, 8 and 10. Other parts of this Bylaw assist with its administration by – • stating the name of this Bylaw and when it comes into force in clauses 1 and 2 • stating where and when this Bylaw applies in clause 3, in particular that it does not apply to issues covered in other Auckland Council, Auckland Transport or Maunga Authority bylaws • stating the purpose of this Bylaw and defining terms used in clauses 4 and 5 • providing transparency about how decisions are made under this Bylaw in clauses 9 and 11 • referencing Council’s powers to enforce this Bylaw, including powers to take property and penalties up to $20,000 in clauses 12, 13 and 14 • ensuring decisions made prior to amendments coming into force on 01 October 2019 continue to apply in Clause 15 • providing time for bylaw provisions about vehicles to be addressed under the Auckland Council Traffic Bylaw 2015 in clause 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Writings Ignited a Powder Keg Key Events Alumni Speakers Staff, Students and the Public Can Hear the Distinguished Alumni Awardees Discussing Their Life and Work
    Fortnightly newsletter for University staff | Volume 39 | Issue 3 | 27 February 2009 Writings ignited a powder keg Key events Alumni speakers Staff, students and the public can hear the Distinguished Alumni Awardees discussing their life and work. A Distinguished Alumni Speaker Day is being held on Saturday 14 March, the day after the gala dinner to honour them.There are five concurrent talks between mid-morning and early afternoon in the Owen G Glenn Building and the Fale Pasifika: Children’s author Lynley Dodd: “Going to the dogs” (10.30-11.30am); the Samoan Prime Minister, the Rt Hon Tuilaepa Malielegaoi: “Survival in the turbulent sea of change of island politics in the calm and peace of the Pacific Ocean” (10.30-11.30am); businessman Richard Chandler (in conversation with the Rt Hon Mike Moore): “Building prosperity for tomorrow’s world” (12noon- 1.15pm); playwright and film-maker Toa Fraser: “Animal tangles: That’s the carnal and the Allen Rodrigo and Brian Boyd at the Fale Pasifika during the symposium. heavenly right there” (12noon-1pm); the Rt Hon A free public all-day symposium on the lasting reverberations can still be felt today. His legacy has Sir Douglas Graham: “Maori representation in legacy of Charles Darwin attracted a crowd that extended beyond biology, beyond natural science Parliament” (12noon-1pm). filled the large Fisher and Paykel Auditorium in and into the humanities and social sciences.” RSVP at www.auckland.ac.nz/speaker-day or the Owen G Glenn Building, and at times This breadth of Darwin’s influence was borne email [email protected] overflowed into a second venue.
    [Show full text]
  • Learnings from a Programme Business Case Transport Networks for Growth Programme
    Learnings from a Programme Business Case Transport Networks for Growth Programme 24 February 2017 Gavin Smith, BCom, MEngSt, CPEng, MIPENZ Principal Transport Planner – Strategic Growth Initiatives Auckland Transport [email protected] Craig Mitchell, BE(Hons), IntPE(NZ), CPEng, MIPENZ Principal Transport Planner – Highways and Network Operations NZ Transport Agency [email protected] Abstract Auckland is expected to grow by up to 1 million people by 20431. It is anticipated that 60-70% of this growth will occur within existing urban areas, with the remainder in future growth areas. Approximately 15,000 hectares of future growth is land that has been identified in the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) to accommodate this. The Business Case approach was used to investigate a future transport network in Auckland’s future growth areas, and deliver the planning and investment outcomes needed. By tailoring the Business Case approach the process ensured that a consistent regional approach was applied at a local level and provided enough detail and flexibility to respond to immediate and on-going development pressures within each growth area. 1 Statistics NZ high growth projections, 2013 Learnings from a Programme Business Case G.Smith, C.Mitchell Page 1 Background The Transport Networks for Growth project (previously known as Transport for Future Urban Growth) was completed in an eight month period in 2016 and is the largest and most complex Programme Business Case completed in New Zealand. The Programme Business Case identified a $7.6 billion regional programme (the Programme) covering four geographical areas (Warkworth, North, North West, South) comprising some 15,000 hectares of future growth areas land.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Strategic Public Transport Network – Lessons Learned from The
    Auckland’s Strategic PT Network D Newcombe Page 0 AUCKLAND’S STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK – LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE BUSINESS CASE APPROACH Author/Presenter: Daniel Newcombe, MEngSt (Transportation), BPlan, MNZPI City Centre & RTN Initiatives team manager, Auckland Transport [email protected] 15th December 2016 ABSTRACT Auckland Transport (AT) is investigating how best to plan and deliver future improvements to the Strategic Public Transport Network (SPTN) to cater for Auckland’s rapidly growing population. The way this work is being undertaken is influenced by NZTA’s new Business Case Approach required for all future transport investments. This paper will outline AT’s work to date on the SPTN and how AT is using the recent Auckland Transport Alignment Project (ATAP) to strategically direct this work. The paper will also cover what AT has learned from applying the various processes contained within the Business Case Approach, how this has shaped the future programme and any wider lessons that could be applied to other transport projects. IPENZ Transportation Group Conference, Hamilton, 29 – 31 March 2017 Auckland’s Strategic PT Network D Newcombe Page 1 INTRODUCTION Auckland Transport (AT) is the road controlling authority responsible for the planning, operation and maintenance of most components of the Auckland transport system, including the public transport network (buses, trains, and ferries). The core of the public transport system is the Strategic Public Transport Network (SPTN) which consists of the heavy rail network and Northern Busway. To receive transport investment from the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for developing the SPTN and all other transport infrastructure or services, AT is required undertake a range of business cases defined under the Business Case Approach (BCA).
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Signal Pre-Emption and Real Time
    AUCKLAND’S SIGNAL PRE-EMPTION AND REAL TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION SYSTEM By Vadi Vencatachellum MIPENZ, Registered Engineer Senior Transport Planner Auckland City Council Page 1 of 12 AUCKLAND’S SIGNAL PRE-EMPTION AND REAL TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION SYSTEM Under a $7million contract, SAAB ITS Pty. Ltd. is supplying and installing an intelligent transport system for public transport in Auckland City. The very complex technical aspects of this project challenged the contractor to create solutions that would meet the performance specification of the contract. This paper outlines the steps leading, it is hoped to the operation of the first stage of Auckland’s Signal Pre-emption and Real Time Passenger Information System later this year. 1. Introduction Since 1998, Auckland City Council has had a working real time passenger information system providing information at 4 bus stops and signal pre-emption at 8 intersections along 2 major bus routes. This system used transponders on buses and detector loops in the carriageway to locate buses and predict their real arrival time at bus stops equipped with variable passenger information display signs. Because of concerns about the increasing costs of expanding the existing system, lack of competition for system supply and the desire to review alternative technologies available, the Council decided to delay implementation. In 1999 the Intelligent Transport System (ITS) consultant PPK Pty Ltd was engaged to carry out a ‘Positioning Review Study’ [1] of available technologies and existing systems, and their benefits and risks. A proposed action plan was developed by PPK to drive the future implementation of a system within the Auckland region, addressing issues including system functional design, system delivery, management, maintenance and future system development.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Growth Delivering Transport Networks
    Supporting Growth Delivering transport networks SUMMARY Supporting Growth – Delivering Transport Networks | Summary 3 The preferred network KEY AUCKLAND IS GROWING FAST WITH AN ADDITIONAL July 2016 Future Urban Zone (Potential Business) 1 July 2016 Future Urban Zone 700,000 TO 1 MILLION PEOPLE EXPECTED TO CALL (Potential Residential & Other Urban Uses) Live Zoned AUCKLAND HOME OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS, REQUIRING Special Purpose Future Urban Zone added as a result of Council decisions on the Unitary Plan ABOUT 400,000 NEW HOMES AND 277,000 JOBS. Special Housing Area (within growth areas) Existing Urban Area State Highway As New Zealand’s largest city, Auckland is Government to improve alignment on a long-term Where will this growth go? New public transport corridor home to about a third of the nation’s population strategic approach to transport in Auckland). It has Improved road corridor and continues to be the country’s fastest also worked closely the “three waters” providers New road corridor growing region. (water supply, stormwater, wastewater) to ensure Rural, coastal Future Ferry services it is aligned with the wider regional plans being and country growth areas Rail corridor improvements While most of Auckland’s growth will take place developed for the city. living outside 2010 Rail corridor investigations within the existing urban areas, around 15,000 metropolitan Safety improvements hectares of greenfield (mainly rural) land has been The programme supports the council’s Future identified in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative Urban Land Supply Strategy which sets the order urban limit in part). This includes areas zoned ‘future urban’ in which land is supplied for development in (rural land zoned for future urban development), future growth areas to house Auckland’s growing 15% 25% as well rural land that has been ‘live zoned’ (zoned population as infrastructure becomes available.
    [Show full text]
  • Otahuhu Historic Heritage Survey
    OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY Overview Report PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH LYN WILLIAMS LISA TRUTTMAN BRUCE W HAYWARD CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES LTD JP ADAM RA SKIDMORE URBAN DESIGN LTD FINAL August 2014 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Brief .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Study area ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Approach .............................................................................. 5 1.4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 5 1.5 Overview of report structure and component parts ........................................... 7 2.0 ŌTĀHUHU STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES ....... 9 2.1 Built Heritage Overview and recommendations ................................................ 9 2.2 Overview and recommendations in relation to geology .................................. 12 2.3 Overview and recommendations in relation to archaeology ........................... 13 2.4 Overview and recommendations Landscape History ...................................... 13 2.5 Overview and recommendations related to Maori Ancestral Relationships and issues identified. ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number
    Ngataringa Bayswater PROPOSED SERVICES Bay KEY SYMBOLS FREQUENT SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES PEAK PERIOD SERVICES Little Shoal Station or key connection point Birkenhead Bay Northwestern Northwest to Britomart via Crosstown 6a Crosstown 6 extension to 101 Pt Chevalier to Auckland University services Northwestern Motorway and Selwyn Village via Jervois Rd Northcote Cheltenham Rail Line Great North Rd To viewNorthcote an individualPoint route map, click on the route number (Passenger Service) Titirangi to Britomart via 106 Freemans Bay to Britomart Loop 209 Beach North Shore Northern Express routes New North Rd and Blockhouse Bay Stanley Waitemata service Train Station NX1, NX2 and NX3 138 Henderson to New Lynn via Mangere Town Centre to Ferries to Northcote, Point Harbour City LINK - Wynyard Quarter to Avondale Peninsula Wynyard Quarter via Favona, Auckland Harbour Birkenhead, West Harbour, North City Link 309X Bridge Beach Haven and Karangahape Rd via Queen St 187 Lynfield to New Lynn via Mangere Bridge, Queenstown Rd Ferries to West Harbour, Hobsonville Head Ferry Terminal Beach Haven and Stanley Bay (see City Centre map) Blockhouse Bay and Pah Rd (non stop Hobsonville Services in this Inner LINK - Inner loop via Parnell, Greenwoods Corner to Newmarket) Services to 191 New Lynn to Blockhouse Bay via North Shore - direction only Inner Link Newmarket, Karangahape Rd, Avondale Peninsula and Whitney St Panmure to Wynyard Quarter via Ferry to 701 Lunn Ave and Remuera Rd not part of this Ponsonby and Victoria Park 296 Bayswater Devonport Onehunga
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Hindrance of Walking and Cycling in Auckland’S Urban Form
    DISCOVERING THE HINDRANCE OF WALKING AND CYCLING IN AUCKLAND’S URBAN FORM. MEYER NEESON A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Urban Design at the University of Auckland, 2020. Abstract Active transport is a fundamental element in a city’s movement network that promotes a sustainable and resilient urban future, yet can only be viable in an urban setting that supports small-scale infrastructure with appropriate street environments. The 1950’s planning regimes have been dominant within Auckland’s transport development with perpetuated traditional aims of increased efficiency and high level infrastructure which enables travel in the comfort of a private vehicle. Attitudes have formulated the urban fabric through funding and investment intervention which resulted in a strong motorway network and low density, sprawling residential suburbs. Psychological public response to this environment is reflected in the heavy reliance on the private vehicle and low rates of walking and cycling. Although Auckland’s transport framework identifies the need for walking and cycling to actively form a strand of Auckland’s transport network, institutional and intellectual embedded ideas of the 1950’s prevent implementation on the ground. The failure of Auckland’s urban form was highlighted in the period of the Covid-19; post lockdown the public reverted back to old transport habits when restrictions were lifted. This pandemic put our city in the spotlight to identify its shortfalls and the urgent need to support a resilient future. Therefore, this research aims to discover the inherent infrastructure and funding barriers that hinder the growth of walking and cycling as a transport method in Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • PC 13 Open Space
    Section 32 Analysis Plan Change – Open Space zone Report Prepared by Panuku Development Auckland PO Box 90343 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142 APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICANT: Panuku Development Auckland PROJECT NAME: Plan Change – Open Space zone DOCUMENT: Section 32 Analysis DATE OF ISSUE: 25th May 2018 REVISION NO.: Rev A CONTACT PERSON: Tommy Ma | Senior Planning Consents Advisor CONTACT MOBILE: 021 822 560 CONTACT EMAIL: [email protected] AUTHORED BY: Tommy Ma | Senior Planning Consents Advisor Panuku Development Auckland REVIEWED BY: Andrew Trevelyan | Principal Planning Consents Advisor Panuku Development Auckland APPROVED FOR RELEASE: Andrew Trevelyan | Principal Planning Consents Panuku Development Auckland Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 2 Issue ................................................................................................................................... 3 Objective ............................................................................................................................. 3 Sites ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]