“Eagle” of the Russian a Ship from Which Begins the History of Domestic State Fleet Shipbuilding P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Eagle” of the Russian a Ship from Which Begins the History of Domestic State Fleet Shipbuilding P neat MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION RestoRation №1 (30) 2017 cRaftsmen of of Renowned shipbuilding shipyaRd hR policy providing a formula sevmorzavod regains its position icebReaking supply vessel for future development of a principal employer and mainstay of the shipbuilding line of industry of sevastopol poweR: 13 MW p. 14 p. 30 gennady nevelskoy icebReaking capability: 1.6 m length: 104.2 m [ project R-71014 ] width: 24 m The multipurpose icebreaking supply vessel “Gennady Nevelskoy” was built at Arctech Helsinki displacement: 3000 t Shipyard within the contract with Sakhalin Energy at the project Sakhalin 2. The icebreaker was speed: 16 kt designed by the Finnish company Aker Arctic Technology. It is intended to perform supply operations for drilling rigs in the north-eastern part of the shelf. The auxiliary functions are: enduRance: 30 days icebreaking operations, icebreaker assistance, duty at the drilling rigs including 350 - ice-class: Icebreaker Ice 15 emergency evacuation and salvage operations, firefighting, oil spill response, diving support, support of operations with yeaR remotely operated underwater vehicles, supporting helicopter takeoff and landing operations. anniveRsaRy of Russian state shipbuilding FEATURe one “eagle” of the Russian a ship fRom which begins the histoRy of domestic state fleet shipbuilding p. 6 COMBAT LOGISTICS SHIP ELBRUS [ project 23120 ] The vessel is under construction in the Northern Shipyard. It is designed for supply of Navy, towing and rendering help to the crews of ships and vessels in distress. DISPLACEMENT: 9500 t LENGTH: 95 m BEAM: 22 m SPEED: 18 kt RANGE: 5000 nautical miles ICE CLASS: ARC4 CREW: 27 persons photo by Victor Chumakov STRENGTH AND POWER AT SEA www.aoosk.ru President’s column The firsT anniversary his anniversary is rather modest, but already filled with history containing both victories and action items. At the same time, the anniversary of USC is, of course, just a tiny T mark on the very long distance covered by the shipwrights of our country on their way. The reminder of it is another commemorative date celebrated by the Russian shipbuilding in this year. 350 years ago the very foundation of our industry was laid – in 1667 the Tsar Aleksey Mikhailovich, father of Peter the Great, signed an ordinance about building a three-master frigate “Oryol” for the government money. It was the first Russian ship that received a personal name. Besides, many historians are convinced that it was on this ship that the Russian state tricoloured flag was raised for the first time. From this event, almost expunged from the memory, from the beginning of construction of great grandfather of the modern fleet, begins also this history of ours – the history of state shipbuilding. It is for this reason why, having consulted employees of the industry, as well as authoritative researchers of national history, we found it fit to put forward the initiative of establishing the professional holiday of shipwrights – Shipbuilder’s day. We believe it the most proper to link it with the day of issuance of the Tsar’s ordinance about keel-laying of frigate – June 29. Key materials of this number of our magazine are dedicated to the topic of origination of Russian shipbuilding. Generations of masters were building the national fleet – from “carpenters eager to work with ships” to our contemporaries, shipbuilding engineers and technicians. THIS ISSUE OF THE USC MAGAZINE Not just families, but dynasties always worked at the OPENS THE ANNIVERSARY YEAR: Russian shipyards, and at all times it was all, and still is, about the people here. The all-important topic of human resourcing IT WILL MARK THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY for shipbuilding is elucidated in the interview of Human Resources Director Eduard Bobritsky, speech of his colleague OF THE UNITED SHIPBUILDING from Sevastopol Shipyard and the Principal of world-famous “Korabelka” (State Marine Technical University) of St. Petersburg CORPORATION Gleb Turichin. Needless to say, it’s impossible to cover such a large-scale topic as development of shipbuilding industry on the pages of just one issue. So, we suggest to continue in the next issues of our magazine. Respectfully, President of USC A.L.Rakhmanov MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION №1 (30) 2017 I USC I 1 page 4 ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEWS page 6 IN ThE bEgINNINg was “OryOl” The ship along with which the Russian state shipbuilding was born page 20 A gENIUS WhO COUld page 24 lOOk INSIdE ThE dEpTh ThErE WIll bE ThE hOlIdAy Life and shipbuilding activity The shipbuilders chose the date for of an outstanding engineer, the professional holiday – the day mathematician and mechanic Ivan of issuance of the Tsar’s decree on Grigoryevich Bubnov the keel-laying of the ship “Oryol” page 30 COMEbACk OF ShIpbUIldErS Revival of the big collective of Sevastopol Shipyard page 34 ONE family The oldest labour dynasties of the Baltic Shipyard page 36 SOrMOvO: tankS ANd SUbMArINES “Pikes”, “eskas” and thirty-fours that helped win the war page 14 page 26 Who Will foundation build the fleet? of shipbuilding Human Resources The Principal Director of the USC of Saint Petersburg Eduard Bobritsky State Marine Technical speaks about University Gleb Turichin human capital on how “Korabelka” of enterprises of will render support to the corporation the industry branch neat MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION RestoRation №1 (30) 2017 cRaftsmen of of Renowned shipbuilding shipyaRd hR policy providing a formula sevmorzavod regains its position for future development of a principal employer and mainstay of the shipbuilding line of industry of sevastopol p. 14 p. 30 350 - yeaR anniveRsaRy of Russian state shipbuilding featuRe one “eagle” of the Russian a ship fRom which begins the histoRy of domestic state fleet shipbuilding p. 6 JSC USC magazine. CirCUlatiOn: 999 addreSS: 11, Bolshaya Tatarskaya St., Moscow, 115184, Russia PreSident Of JSC USC: page 46 Alexey Rakhmanov. www.aoosk.ru that’s hoW icebreaKers editOr-in-Chief: get names Coverage of nomination ceremony Vyacheslav Ivanov of icebreaking supply vessel built by the order managing editOr: Mariya Arsenyeva of Sovcomflot intended for operations with drilling rigs deSign and makeUP: KLIMOV DESIGN STUDIO. page 48 Tel.: + 7 (499) 740-60-18. a man and a steamship www.klimov-design.ru Historical contribution of the Russian admiral, Opinions of the authors may not explorer of the Far East, founder of the town coincide with the editorial board page 42 Nikolayevsk-on-Amur – Gennady Nevelskoyо On the front cover: Kronstadt giant 350 years ago, in 1667, page 50 P.I. Veleschinsky dock the national state is the youngest and the obstacle course shipbuilding was inchoated. The Moscow tsar Alexey biggest dock of the Kronstadt shipbuilding Ivan Shestakov Mikhaylovich, father of Marine Plant and his equivocal role in development of Peter the Great, signed the Russian shipbuilding in the late XIX century a decree prescribing to build a three-mast ship “Oryol” using the public money. The birth of this legendary ship became a starting point of domestic state shipbuilding. Its symbolic representation adorns the spire of Admiralty in Saint Petersburg. It is widely thought among specialists that it was on “Oryol” that the Russian tricoloured flag was raised for the first time. And ten years ago, with decree of the President of the Russian Federation on creation of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, recreation of the modern Russian shipbuilding industry branch began. news The first jubilee The industry branch meeting “10 years of USC: results and industry trends” was held in Moscow chaired by the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation, Denis Manturov April 19 The advanced patrol from the Admiralty team keel-laying ceremony of multipurpose ice-class patrol ship Ivan Papanin, project 23550, took place at the Admiralty Shipyards The ceremony Bystrov addressed was attended by the attendees. – March 21 the Commander-In- The Admiralty Chief of the Russian Shipyards have always The highlight of the shipyard, Eduard Efimov, Navy, Admiral Vladimir been a construction program was conferment and General Director of Korolev, the Principal site of high-technology of the title of “Honorary the Baltic Shipyard – Adviser to the President and knowledge- Shipbuilder” and Shipbuilding, Alexey of USC, Victor Chirkov, intensive ships of distribution of certificates of Kadilov. and the Deputy General a new type, and this appreciation and gratitude The session of reports Director of the JSC keel-laying today to the shipbuilders by of the President of USC “Admiralty Shipyards”, is demonstrative the Minister. The following and general directors of Andrey Bystrov. continuation of this persons became the the USC Group confirmed “We are participating tradition. We have no honorary shipbuilders on a good “health” of in a significant event – doubts that the new that day: General Director the holding company keel-laying ceremony ship Ivan Papanin will of Admiralty Shipyards, as a shared network of of the advanced be built according to Alexandr Buzakov, Director shipbuilding capacities ice-class patrol the contract terms and General of the Baltic Yantar of the country. ship, – Andrey with high quality. May 5 TAnkeR FoR The VICToRy DAy The second chemical tanker of project RST27 built for Volgotrans company left the staples of “krasnoye Sormovo” plant The main participants of the event were representatives of the regional administration, the plant and the business customer, as
Recommended publications
  • Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
    Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolay Luzin, His Students, Adversaries, and Defenders (Notes
    Nikolay Luzin, his students, adversaries, and defenders (notes on the history of Moscow mathematics, 1914-1936) Yury Neretin This is historical-mathematical and historical notes on Moscow mathematics 1914-1936. Nikolay Luzin was a central figure of that time. Pavel Alexandroff, Nina Bari, Alexandr Khinchin, Andrey Kolmogorov, Mikhail Lavrentiev, Lazar Lyusternik, Dmitry Menshov, Petr Novikov, Lev Sсhnirelman, Mikhail Suslin, and Pavel Urysohn were his students. We discuss the time of the great intellectual influence of Luzin (1915-1924), the time of decay of his school (1922-1930), a moment of his administrative power (1934-1936), and his fall in July 1936. But the thing which served as a source of Luzin’s inner drama turned out to be a source of his subsequent fame... Lazar Lyusternik [351] Il est temps que je m’arr ete: voici que je dis, ce que j’ai d´eclar´e, et avec raison, ˆetre inutile `adire. Henri Lebesgue, Preface to Luzin’s book, Leˇcons sur les ensembles analytiques et leurs applications, [288] Прошло сто лет и что ж осталось От сильных, гордых сих мужей, Столь полных волею страстей? Их поколенье миновалось Alexandr Pushkin ’Poltava’ There is a common idea that a life of Nikolay Luzin can be a topic of a Shakespeare drama. I am agree with this sentence but I am extremely far from an intention to realize this idea. The present text is an impassive historical-mathematical and historical investigation of Moscow mathematics of that time. On the other hand, this is more a story of its initiation and turning moments than a history of achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Monarchy in Russia
    wh07_te_ch04_s05_MOD_s.fm Page 168 Monday, March 5, 2007 12:28WH07MOD_se_CH04_S05_s.fm PM Page 168 Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:45 PM The palace (left) of Catherine the Great (far left) reflects both European and traditional Russian architectural styles. Step-by-Step SECTION Instruction 5 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO A Foreign Princess Takes the Throne Objectives For twenty years, the German princess Catherine lived As you teach this section, keep students at the Russian court, enduring an unhappy marriage to focused on the following objectives to help the Russian heir apparent, who was widely considered them answer the Section Focus Question to be insane. She filled her time reading, studying and master core content. French philosophy, building alliances behind the scenes, and biding her time. When her husband ■ Explain how Peter the Great tried to became emperor in 1762, she called on her allies to make Russia into a modern state. act. Within a few months he had been deposed and ■ Identify the steps Peter took to expand Catherine proclaimed empress of Russia. Like Peter the Russia’s borders. Great before her, Catherine would rule with intelligence, a firm hand, and a mind set on ■ Describe how Catherine the Great modernization. strengthened Russia. Focus Question How did Peter the Great and Catherine the Great strengthen Russia and expand its territory? Absolute Monarchy in Russia Prepare to Read In the early 1600s, Russia was still a medieval state, untouched by Objectives the Renaissance or Reformation and largely isolated from Western Build Background Knowledge L3 • Explain how Peter the Great tried to make Russia into a modern state.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Legitimation Formula - 1991-2000
    THE RUSSIAN LEGITIMATION FORMULA - 1991-2000 Carolina Vendil The Government Department LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Thesis submitted for PhD degree Supervisor: Professor Dominic Lieven Advisor: Professor Rodney Barker - 1 - UMI Number: U174000 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U174000 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ti-f£$£ IP ^6^771 Abstract The Russian legitimation formula contains the arguments the Russian leadership advanced to promote its state-building project between 1991 and 2000. The period of investigation coincides with Yeltsin’s presidency. The focus is on how the legitimation rhetoric was adjusted both to changing circumstances over time and to three main audiences: the Russian domestic population, the Russian domestic elites and the international community. In order to analyse the contents of the legitimation formula a framework was developed which divided the different arguments used by the Russian leadership into six main categories (democratic, national, charismatic, eudaemonic, external and negative arguments). The material selected for analysis had to relate to basic features of statehood.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Heineman Royal Ancestors Medieval Europe
    HERALDRYand BIOGRAPHIES of the HEINEMAN ROYAL ANCESTORS of MEDIEVAL EUROPE HERALDRY and BIOGRAPHIES of the HEINEMAN ROYAL ANCESTORS of MEDIEVAL EUROPE INTRODUCTION After producing numerous editions and revisions of the Another way in which the royal house of a given country familiy genealogy report and subsequent support may change is when a foreign prince is invited to fill a documents the lineage to numerous royal ancestors of vacant throne or a next-of-kin from a foreign house Europe although evident to me as the author was not clear succeeds. This occurred with the death of childless Queen to the readers. The family journal format used in the Anne of the House of Stuart: she was succeeded by a reports, while comprehensive and the most popular form prince of the House of Hanover who was her nearest for publishing genealogy can be confusing to individuals Protestant relative. wishing to trace a direct ancestral line of descent. Not everyone wants a report encumbered with the names of Unlike all Europeans, most of the world's Royal Families every child born to the most distant of family lines. do not really have family names and those that have adopted them rarely use them. They are referred to A Royal House or Dynasty is a sort of family name used instead by their titles, often related to an area ruled or by royalty. It generally represents the members of a family once ruled by that family. The name of a Royal House is in various senior and junior or cadet branches, who are not a surname; it just a convenient way of dynastic loosely related but not necessarily of the same immediate identification of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME Security &Defence M
    June MARITIME 2021 a7.50 Security D 14974 E &Defence MSD From the Sea and Beyond ISSN 1617-7983 • Key Developments in... • Amphibious Warfare www.maritime-security-defence.com • • Asia‘s Power Balance MITTLER • European Submarines June 2021 • Port Security REPORT NAVAL GROUP DESIGNS, BUILDS AND MAINTAINS SUBMARINES AND SURFACE SHIPS ALL AROUND THE WORLD. Leveraging this unique expertise and our proven track-record in international cooperation, we are ready to build and foster partnerships with navies, industry and knowledge partners. Sovereignty, Innovation, Operational excellence : our common future will be made of challenges, passion & engagement. POWER AT SEA WWW.NAVAL-GROUP.COM - Design : Seenk Naval Group - Crédit photo : ©Naval Group, ©Marine Nationale, © Ewan Lebourdais NAVAL_GROUP_AP_2020_dual-GB_210x297.indd 1 28/05/2021 11:49 Editorial Hard Choices in the New Cold War Era The last decade has seen many of the foundations on which post-Cold War navies were constructed start to become eroded. The victory of the United States and its Western Allies in the unfought war with the Soviet Union heralded a new era in which navies could forsake many of the demands of Photo: author preparing for high intensity warfare. Helping to ensure the security of the maritime shipping networks that continue to dominate global trade and the vast resources of emerging EEZs from asymmetric challenges arguably became many navies’ primary raison d’être. Fleets became focused on collabora- tive global stabilisation far from home and structured their assets accordingly. Perhaps the most extreme example of this trend has been the German Navy’s F125 BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG class frig- ates – hugely sophisticated and expensive ships designed to prevail only in lower threat environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Afanasyeva V.Pdf (5.070Mb)
    Logistics and Transport BE 303 E Supply chain of the Shtokman field development project by Veronika Afanasyeva Spring 2009 Abstract Supply chains are always fairly complex, and each industry’s chain has its own quirks and characteristics. The strategic nature of the product makes the oil and gas supply chain distinct from other industries. The given work sets a task to investigate the supply chain in oil and gas on the example of the Shtokman gas and condensate field development project. It is quite a challenging mission if to take into consideration the size of the project and its unique character. The given research is conducted to develop and extend the supply chain theory in oil and gas industry. The research objectives lead to use the theory-oriented type of research with stress on theory testing. Under these circumstances, the single-case study method and semi- structured interviews as a primary source of data are chosen. To build the entire supply chain of the Shtokman project there is a need to describe it first. The history of the field exploration, selection of partners, engineering concept of the project are reflected in the empirical part. Additionally, the project’s description includes the transportation system and marketing strategy of natural gas and LNG distribution. Moreover, the environmental and political aspects of the project which are essential for oil and gas field development find its reflection in the practical part of the work. The analysis of the project with regard to the received from interviews data and other reliable sources of information helps to build the supply chain in the Shtokman project and put value on the supply chain integration and cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sanctions Will Affect Russian Shipbuilding
    WESTERN SANCTIONS WILL AFFECT RUSSIAN SHIPBUILDING Western sanctions will not hamper construction of nuclear icebreakers, but can have negative consequences for other Russian civilian shipbuilding. Western sanctions could curb Russian Arctic oil Statoil, Rosneft delay Siberian drilling, while CEO Sechin added to international sanction list This week the U.S. and EU hardened its sanctions against Russia designed to punish its continuing backing of separatists in Eastern Ukraine. The sanctions include the EU banning any trade in arms and the US prohibiting transactions with Russia’s United Shipbuilding Corporation, which it classified as a defense company. According to the United Shipbuilding Corporation the sanctions will probably have no impact on state orders that already are under construction, but can seriously hamper future orders. The Baltic Shipyard outside St. Petersburg has orders to construct Russia’s three next, much-needed nuclear-powered icebreakers. The prototype was laid down in November 2013 and is planned to be ready for service in December 2017. The two next icebreakers should be ready for delivery in 2019 and 2020. “We don’t see any problems in the construction of the nuclear icebreakers, since no part of the equipment - down to the last bolt and screw – has anything to do with the U.S.” a spokesperson from United Shipbuilding Corporation says to Arctic Info. Others are not so optimistic about the future of civilian Russian shipbuilding after the last sanctions were imposed. Head of St. Petersburg’s Committee for Industrial Policy and Innovation Maksim Meyksin says to website Baltpp that the sanctions can have serious impacts on the large shipyards in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Crew Lists of HIMS Vostok and Mirnyi
    Appendix 1 – Crew Lists of HIMS Vostok and Mirnyi The crew lists were translated from (CL) but without the pay rates. Five names added from Two Seasons or the post-voyage report on crew status (Moller, 1821) are marked with asterisks. The lists do not give patro- nymics and do not identify any cooks. The statement that Nikita Il’in was of ‘officer rank’ (TS, 1: 9) may simply mean that he was a gentleman but not yet a commissioned officer. The crew status report confirms the presence of a third, unidentified servant on Vostok and so corroborates Bellingshausen’s tally of 189 people without the chaplain (TS, 1: 7–9), in short 190 people. Crew of HIMS Vostok Commanding officer: Junior Captain Bellingshausen Captain Lieutenant: Ivan Zavodovskii Lieutenants: Ivan Ignat’ev; Konstantin Torson; Arkadii Leskov Midshipman: Dmitrii Demidov Astronomer: Ivan Simonov* Artist: Pavel Mikhailov* Clerk: Ivan Rezanov Gardemarine: Roman Adams* Navigator: Yakov Paryadin Warrant officers: Andrei Sherkunov; Pëtr Kryukov Master’s mate: Fëdor Vasil’ev Staff surgeon: Yakov Berkh Surgeon’s mate: Ivan Stepanov Quartermasters: Sandash Aneyev; Aleksei Aldygin; Martyn Stepanov; Aleksei Stepanov Butcher: Grigorii Diyakov Drummer: Leontii Churkin Seamen, 1st Class: Semën Trofimov (helmsman); Gubei Abdulov; Stepan Sazanov; Pëtr Maksimov; Kondratii Petrov; Olav Rangoil’; Paul Yakobson; Leon Dubovskii; Semën 214 Crew Lists 215 Gulyayev; Grigorii Anan’in; Grigorii Yelsukov; Stepan Filipov; Sidor Lukin; Matvei Khandukov; Kondratii Borisov; Yeremei Andreyev; Danil Kornev; Sidor
    [Show full text]