DOCSLIB.ORG

Howard Morse Jarvis Loyola Ll K Edzie P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Howard Morse Jarvis Loyola Ll K Edzie P PURPLE LINE continues downtown weekday rush periods Linden Central Noyes Foster Davis Dempster-Skokie Dempster Main Oakton-Skokie South Blvd Howard YELLOW LINE Jarvis Morse Loyola Granville Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Thorndale SUMMARY Chicago, Illinois | April 2015 Chicago Transit Authority Bryn Mawr Berwyn Cumberland O'Hare Harlem Rosemont BLUE LINE Argyle edzie Kimball K Lawrence Jefferson Park Wilson t Montrose Montrose r Sheridan Irving Park Irving Park aulina Southpo Addison Addison P Addison Belmont Belmont Wellington Logan Square Diversey California Fullerton Sedgwick Western Armitage y- Damen North/Clybourn Clark/Division ark ator v Division ark o eland Chicago Chicago Chicago ustin Merch edzie Grand Grand A Cicer Central P Conser Central Oak P Laramie Pulaski Harlem/Lake Ridg K Mart GREEN LINE See ornia ark gan Downtown ark o f Cali Inset Ashland Mor estern ustin edzie- W A Cicer Oak P Harlem Homan K Pulaski District Illinois Medical Forest P BLUE LINE Polk Harrison UIC- Roosevelt 18th Racine Halsted PINK LINE Cermak-Chinatown o ark ornia edzie Halsted estern ostner r Cice ORANGE LINE K Damen Pulaski K W f Cali Ashland Central P 54th/Cermak 35th/Archer Sox-35th 35th-Bronzeville-IIT Indiana 43rd Kedzie 47th 47th Western 51st Pulaski Garfield RED LINE Garfield Midway GREEN LINE 63rd GREEN LINE Ashland Branch d East 63rd Branch 69th lem-bound Halsted King Dr rove 79th e G g boarding only Har 87th June 2014 Ashland/63r Cotta 95th/Dan Ryan PROJECT SUMMARY Introduction and Project Overview The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) is undertaking an initiative to completely rebuild the northern portion of the Red Line from Belmont station to Howard station and the Purple Line from Belmont station to Linden station. The Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Program would fully replace old, deteriorating infrastructure and stations along Chicago’s busiest rail line, paving the way for CTA to significantly increase train capacity and improve service for generations to come. RPM Phase One This massive, multistaged program would be completed in phases and would provide riders with all the benefits of modern service and infrastructure when complete. As part of the program, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and CTA have been analyzing proposed improvements to the line. Phase One of the RPM Program includes the Red-Purple Bypass Project and the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project. Within the RPM corridor, Phase One also includes corridor signal and other interim track improvements, which are not anticipated to have any significant environmental impacts. CTA is developing preliminary designs for these interdependent projects, while each undergoes separate environmental review. This Environmental Assessment (EA) covers the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project. Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project The Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project would include reconstruction of approximately 1.3 miles of the existing rail line from Leland Avenue on the south to near Ardmore Avenue on the north. The four stations (Lawrence, Argyle, Berwyn, and Bryn Mawr) in this segment would be rebuilt, expanded, and modernized, while adding elevators that provide access for people with disabilities and improve convenience for the elderly and riders with carts, strollers, and bags. The proposed project would increase passenger capacity and station access along the corridor, expand platforms and stairways, and replace and modernize crumbling embankment walls and bridge structures. In 2014, over 5 million transit trips began at these stations. Despite recent station improvements, the main support structures, which were built over 90 years ago, are outdated and have never been replaced. The proposed improvements would modernize the infrastructure and also allow CTA to accommodate more riders, including riders with disabilities. Project Summary About this Summary Linden Central Noyes Foster Davis Dempster Main South Blvd Howard Jarvis FTA and CTA have prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lawrence Morse to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project. The EA is a federally mandated document that evaluates the significance of impacts of the transportation project proposal. Loyola This summary provides an overview of the content and process used to prepare Granville the EA. Thorndale Contents of this project summary include the following: Bryn Mawr • The purpose and need for the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Berwyn • A summary of the planning process and alternatives that led to this project proposal Argyle • A description of the proposed project, identified as the Build Alternative Lawrence • A summary of the potential benefits and impacts of the Build Alternative, along Wilson with proposed mitigation measures for adverse impacts • An overview of the public outreach and process Sheridan • Project commitments and next steps Addison Belmont Purpose of the Environmental Assessment (EA) Process The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 The EA provides a detailed assessment of social, (NEPA) is a federal law that mandates the economic, and environmental impacts of the Fullerton consideration of environmental impacts before proposed project and recommends measures to Sedgwick approval of any federally funded project that may address the identified impacts. have significant impacts on the environment or Following public feedback on the EA, FTA will issue where impacts have not yet been determined. a finding on the proposedNo rtprojecth/Cly bbasedourn on the Clark/Division The NEPA process provides a decision-making significance of impacts identified during the NEPA framework to consider the purpose and need for a process. The finding will guide future planning and Chicago Chicago proposed action, potential design solutions, project implementation of the project. costs, and relative benefits. Merch Grand Mart 2 Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project See Downtown Project Summary Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Need for the Project The purpose of the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr • Peak ridership demand exceeds existing Modernization Project is to provide continued infrastructure capacity, both on the line and at high-speed transit service connecting Chicago’s stations. North Side and northern suburbs to the Loop • A substantial number of transit customers rely and the rest of the Chicago metropolitan area. on the existing train line to connect Chicago’s The project will expand capacity to meet growing North Side and northern suburbs with the Loop ridership demand, while reducing train travel (Chicago’s central business district) and the rest times and improving access to the system for of the metropolitan area. people with disabilities. • Passenger crowding is common on trains and The capacity expansion would have the added platforms. benefit of bringing the aging rail infrastructure • Existing infrastructure is substantially past its into a state of good repair, thereby improving expected lifespan. efficiency and service reliability. Providing modern amenities at all stations, expanding of passenger • Station improvements are needed to ensure capacity, and enhancing speed and reliability ADA accessibility. would address safety and accessibility concerns • Maintaining safe operating conditions becomes and extend the useful life of the system. more difficult and costly as the infrastructure ages. Red Line – Over 90Years of Service Lawrence station, 1940s, looking east. Chicago Transit Authority Argyle station, 1940s, looking west. Photo Courtesy of Chicago Berwyn station, 1957, looking east. Chicago Transit Authority History Museum Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project 3 Project Summary Alternatives Development Process The proposed project evaluated in this EA was developed and evolved through a multiyear planning process that began in 2009. From 2009 to 2013, CTA has continued to refine the Build Alternative based on technical analyses and through continual dialogue with the community. 2009–2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Research and RPM Phase One NEPA Scoping Alternatives RPM Vision Study Concept Design Definition and NEPA Process Refinement Process Reviews • 2009–2010: CTA conducted a vision study • 2012: CTA held two community update meetings between fall 2009 and fall 2010 to understand in early 2012, which allowed attendees to the public’s priorities and concerns, conduct an learn about refined alternatives for the RPM existing conditions analysis, and frame project corridor based on public scoping, review project alternatives. This analysis helped define the information, and clarify their understanding of the purpose and need for the project and included a project and environmental process. high-level evaluation of potential improvements • 2013: During 2013, CTA conducted additional to the corridor. The process included four public research and a conceptual design process to look meetings attended by over 300 people, a website, at ways to further minimize environmental impacts. a comment period, and a direct mail survey sent In late 2013, FTA and CTA developed a tailored out to over 11,000 residents and businesses along approach for phased improvements to the RPM the corridor. corridor • 2011: In January 2011, the NEPA scoping • 2014: CTA announced the Lawrence to Bryn process began. The purpose of this process Mawr Modernization Project to the public in April was to inform the public about the project and 2014. Throughout spring 2014, CTA held a number gather input on the scope of the environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilson Transfer Station Consulting Parties Meeting
    WILSON TRANSFER STATION CONSULTING PARTIES MEETING Chicago Transit Authority AGENDA I. Welcome II. What is Section 106? III. Consulting Parties Introduction IV. Community Outreach V. Project Purpose and Need VI. Project Design VII.Amended Area of Potential Effect (APE) VIII.Memorandum of Agreement IX. Consulting Parties Input X. Next Steps 2 II. WHAT IS SECTION 106? In the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Congress established a comprehensive program to preserve the historical and cultural foundation of the Nation. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to consider the effects of projects they carry out, approve, or fund on historic properties. Section 106 review ensures that preservation values are factored into federal agency planning and decisions. Section 106 review requires federal agencies to gather information to decide which properties in the area that may be affected by the project are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places; determine how the historic properties might be affected; explore measures to avoid or reduce harm to historic properties and reach an agreement with the State Historic Preservation Officer on such measures to resolve any adverse effects. 3 II. WHAT IS SECTION 106? (CONTINUED) Wilson Transfer Station Project Section 106 Timeline • January 9, 2012 FTA sends Section 106 project initiation letter to Illinois Historic Preservation Agency (IHPA) • September 4, 2012 FTA sends the Historic Architectural Survey (containing
    [Show full text]
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
    [Show full text]
  • June 2020 Project Management Oversight Report
    Project Management Oversight June 2020 REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2020 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, Invest in Transit, highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. The Rebuild Illinois funding is planned to expedite overdue repair and replacement projects, reduce the backlog of deferred improvements, and move the system toward a state of good repair. It nearly doubles the previous five‐year regional capital program of $4.3 billion. The new funds enable real progress on the state of good repair, by allowing improvements and in some cases replace aging system assets. Due to the current events, there is a level of uncertainty around the PAYGO and State Bond funding, which is dependent on revenues that may not reach the previously projected levels in the current economy. At this time the Service Boards are continuing with the implementation of their capital programs and working through the grant application process for the Rebuild Illinois funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Tour October 20, 2002
    4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour October 20, 2002 Presented By: Chicago-L.org 4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour Guide Union Loop When the tour begins at Quincy station downtown, you will find yourself on the old Union Elevated Railroad, commonly known as "the Loop." The only man who could accomplish the difficult task of bringing a common downtown terminal to the Chicago elevated rapid transit system, which used to end at a separate terminal for each company, was Charles Tyson Yerkes. He had enough political deftness and power to convince store owners to sign consent forms allowing construction of the overhead structures on their streets (although alley routes were briefly contemplated). Though it was difficult — two segments had to be obtained under the names of existing "L" companies while for the two other legs, two companies, the Union Elevated Railroad and the Union Consolidated Elevated Railroad, had to be created — Yerkes managed to coordinate it all. As can be imagined from its piecemeal The construction of the Loop through downtown, seen here look- method of obtaining of leases, the Union Loop (referred ing west at Lake and Wabash circa 1894, was a major construction to simply as "the Loop" today) opened in pieces, starting project. In spite of the disruption, the project brought innumerous benefits to the central business district. (Photo from the Krambles- in 1895, with the Lake Street "L" making the first full Peterson Archive) circuit in 1897. North Side Main Line/Ravenswood Line After leaving the Loop through Tower 18 (at Lake & Wells), once the busiest railroad junction in the world, you will be on what is today the Brown (Ravenswood) Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 105TH
    Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 Working Copy 105TH/VINCENNES T-111 Ends on 12/31/2025 Fund / Project Balances 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Fund Balance 1. FY 2018 Year End Available Fund Balance $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Subtotal $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Revenue 1. Property tax $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Subtotal $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $7,123,600 Transfers Between TIF Districts 1. From 119th/I-57 (RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge) $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400$353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Subtotal $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $1,636,700 $1,283,300 $1,283,300 $1,366,600 $1,366,600 $9,244,000 Current Obligations 1. Program administration $0 ($21,800) ($22,500) ($23,400)($28,500) ($33,700) ($129,900) 2. RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge ($1,039,200) ($1,586,800) ($1,043,400) ($1,043,400)($1,043,400) ($1,043,400) ($6,799,600) 3. Residential St Resurfacing - Ward 34 ($43,200) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($43,200) 4. Lighting - arterial - West Pullman ($41,000) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($41,000) Subtotal ($1,123,400) ($1,608,600) ($1,065,900) ($1,066,800) ($1,071,900) ($1,077,100) ($7,013,700) Net Revenue $1,184,100 $28,100 $217,400 $216,500 $294,700 $289,500 $2,230,300 Proposed Projects 1.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Project Management Oversight Report
    REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2019 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, “Invest in Transit,” highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. After nearly a decade without a State of Illinois capital program, transit in the RTA region will get a much‐needed infusion from the Rebuild Illinois bill passed on June 1, 2019 by the General Assembly. The RTA is looking forward to the implementation of this new state capital plan however there is a concern that the proposed funding for transit does not meet the current needs as identified in “Invest in Transit.” The 55 projects detailed in this report together represent $5,712,260,030 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed toward compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. All of the state funded projects are within budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheridan Park Sheridan Park
    invest in uptown's sheridan park Sheridan Park The Loop Packed with Local Flavor Sheridan Park is a district within the Uptown neighborhood, centered along Wilson Avenue and known for its historic homes and many small businesses. The area is adjacent to Truman College and its 23,000 faculty and students and is near large-scale events such as Chicago’s Pride Parade and the Windy City RibFest that attracts over 20,000 annually, plus the concerts and shows in Uptown’s many venues. Tap Into $600 Million of Public & Private Investment Sheridan Park is conveniently located to the tremendous public investment that is rebuilding Uptown’s transit and streets. The Wilson El station is undergoing a $205 million reconstruction, a $6 million Lawrence-Broadway streetscaping will add a plaza and stage to Broadway in 2017, plus the Red Line viaducts will soon be rebuilt. Additionally, 2,300 new residential units are proposed or under construction in the Uptown area, along with 150,000+ new square feet of retail space that includes Treasure Island Foods, Ross, and others. These public and private investments ensure continued vibrancy and Average household income: growth in the neighborhood for years to come. $71,905 Annual food spending: Sheridan Park $28.3 Million at a Glance: Millenials: Total annual spending: 49% 151 Million Median age: Total spending within 20-minute drive: 34.8 $22.3 Billion 2016 population: College educated: Uptown employees’ weekly spending: 7,379 61.7% $195,000+ Daytime population: Transit commuters: Uptown annual spending: 6,372 43% $1.2 Billion Uptown United provides technical assistance to property and business owners, developers, entrepreneurs, and non-profits with financing, city licensing and permitting, and site selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage a Construction
    Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage A Construction Town Hall audience questions from March 2&4, 2021* meetings General questions Q. What does this project cost and how is it funded? A. The $2.1 billion RPM Phase One project is funded through a combination of federal and local funds including: $957 in federal Core Capacity funds (FTA); a federal $125 million Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) grant from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP); $622 million in Transit TIF (tax-increment financing) funds from the City of Chicago; and CTA financing. Q. Are updates and notices available in languages other than English? A. Yes. We regularly provide subtitled recordings of past community meetings in Chinese, Spanish and Vietnamese, as well as translated flyers distributed to local community organizations. Additionally, we offer live translation services for public meetings upon request. Q. When will the block-by-block meetings happen? A. They will be scheduled for April 2021. We will notify the public when the dates are finalized. Q. When will the project start? A. Stage A construction is expected to begin Spring 2021. Once construction schedules are finalized, we will notify the public in advance of important construction start dates. Station design/station and track construction Q. Why won’t you have temporary stations at Lawrence and Berwyn? A. There is not enough space available to build temporary stations at those locations, unfortunately. Passengers who normally board at Lawrence can use Wilson or Argyle stations, which are each a quarter mile away and connected via the #36 Broadway bus, and Berwyn customers can use the Bryn Mawr or Argyle stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Area
    TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION PROJECT AREA Purpose • Create a community-led vision for redevelopment in the neighborhood • Test specific concepts for CTA owned parcels • Expedite development post-construction Timing • Outgrowth of the community engagement process that began in 2009 • Planning Grant award from Federal Transit Administration • Coordination between transit project and development sites Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area Community Engagement 12 month process 22 stakeholder meetings including 3 open house meetings: • May 2017 – idea gathering • November 2017 – vision & goals; initial ideas • May 2018 – review of recommendations; next steps Aldermanic dialogue Website updates Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area TOD Planning Process TODAY Discovery Visioning Development Recommendations Implementation 2018 2020’s • Existing • Engagement • Concept • Public meeting • Select Conditions development developers • Vision • Final report • Market • Market testing • Zoning / Analysis • Principles and public review Goals • Engagement • Transit project • Construction coordination • Concept refinement • Aldermanic reviews Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area A Multi-Modal District Pedestrians • Enhanced pedestrian environment • Widened sidewalk on Hollywood Boulevard Transit • CTA Bryn Mawr, Berwyn, Argyle, and Lawrence stations • Increased transit service • #36, #81, #84,
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Project Management Oversight Report
    Project Management Oversight December 2020 REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – DECEMBER 2020 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct , interviews project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, Invest in Transit, highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. The Rebuild Illinois funding is planned to expedite overdue repair and replacement projects, reduce the backlog of deferred improvements, and move the system toward a state of good repair. It nearly doubles the previous five‐year regional capital program of $4.3 billion. The funds enable real progress on the state of good repair, by allowing improvements and in some cases replace aging system assets. Although this has been a difficult year due to operating funding shortfalls related to COVID‐19, the Service Boards are continuing with the implementation of their capital programs. This report includes, for the first time, 13 Rebuild Illinois projects representing $655 million in Rebuild Illinois funding. The 13 projects reported on have begun during this reporting period and have ongoing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-By-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021
    Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-by-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021 The CTA held station-by-station meetings to provide the public with an update of upcoming construction activities for the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project, which is a part of the Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Phase One project. Below is a summary of the questions and answers discussed in each of the meetings. Bryn Mawr station Q. How long will Bryn Mawr station be under construction and will it be closed at any point? A. The Bryn Mawr station will close on May 16, 2021, but you will still be able to access the Red Line from the new Bryn Mawr temporary station entrances. During Stage A construction (2021-late 2022), there will be a separate entrance for Howard, or northbound, service located on Bryn Mawr. 95th-bound, or southbound, service will use the entrance on Broadway. During Stage B (late 2022- 2024), there will be southbound-only access via a temporary entrance on Bryn Mawr. The new station will open by the end of 2024. Q. When will the temporary station open and will the temporary stations be ADA accessible? The temporary station will open May 16, 2021. It will not be ADA accessible but the new permanent station, opening in 2024, will have both elevator and escalator access. Q. Given the tracks are expanding and getting wider, are there plans for some type of sound barrier? A. Yes, the new track structure will have noise barriers. Q. Is construction working from north to south? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
    06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old.
    [Show full text]