DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Foreign Policy and the Baltic States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1996-03 U.S. foreign policy and the Baltic states Shuey, Karin A. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32202 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS U. S. FOREIGN POLICY AND THE BALTIC STATES by Karin A. Shuey March 1996 Thesis Advisors: Rodney Minott Bertrand Patenaude Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. • Form Approved REPORTc DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMS No. 0704-0188 Pubhc repo~1ng burden for this collection of infe<mat10n IS est1mated to a•erage 1 hour per response. 1ncluding the time for rev1ew1ng_ instructions •. searching exrst1ng data sources. gathering and mainta1n1ng the data needed, and completing and rev1ew1ng the collectiOn of 1nformat1on. Send comments r~ard1ng th1s bur~n estrmate or any other aspect of this collectron of information. 1nclud1ng suggestions for reducing th1s burden. to Wash1ngton HeadQua~ers Services. Directorate or InformatiOn Operations and Reports. 1215 Jefferson oavrs Highway. Suite 1204. Arlington. VA 22202-4302. and to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188). Wash1ngton. DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 12. REPORT DATE 13. REPORT TYPE AND OATES COVERED March 1996 "... 1 The,;i!':· 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS U.S. Foreign Policy· and the Balli..: States 6. AUTHOR(S) - Lt. KarinA Shuey, USN 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Naval Postgraduate School, Codt 38 Montere~·, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADORESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflecte the official policy or position of the Depmment of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Appro\·e tor public release; disuibution is unlimited. 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) This thesis examines L: S. foreign policy toward the Baltic states from 1918 to 1991 to determine if the U.S. has been realistic in its dealings with small nations. An analysis of U.S. policy indicates that the United States acts h:-pocritically b:· accepting comrromises on the very moral principals to which it claims to be the protectorate of, \\'hen domestic political costs art high. The sacritice of national values degrades the credibility of the moral high g:round necessary tor U.S. policy This study re\'iews the events that occurred during the three major periods in U.S.-Baltic relations: The initial period of Baltic independence following World War I; the Soviet annexation ofthe Baltics during World War IL and linally the beginning oftht second period of Baltic independence during the breakup of the So,·iet Union. In all three cases, U.S. policy was unclem· and contradictory. The Baltic case provides a good example of the tendency tor U.S. policy to be paradoxical and ineffective. This study concludes that despite the U.S. policy of nonrecognition of the Soviet annexation of the Baltic states during the Cold War, the l'nited States failed to adhere to its principals when given the opportunity. In the process. it also neglected problems within its borders that required attention perhaps more urgently than those outside. The tendency for U.S. pvlicy to ignore the issues that actually threaten its security internally and placing a higher priority on extemal matters that do not haYe a real impact on its standing could likely lead to its inadYertent downt:111. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 68 l3alll<.: States. U.S. Foreign Polic. 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT !INC! .\SSIF!J.'f) JJNCTASST'FTFD l!N('T A:-i:-ilt-- 11- UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89) Pr<'\Cr•b<'CI bv ANSI St,j Z39·18 11 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. U. S. FOREIGN POLICY AND THE BALTIC STATES Karin A. Shuey Lieutenant, United States Navy B.A., University ofWashington, 1987 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL M<llrPh 1996 Author: Approved by: Department ofNational Security Affairs ll1 IV ABSTRACT This thesis examines U.S. foreign policy toward the Baltic states from 1918 to 1991 to determine if the U.S. has been realistic in its dealings with small nations. An analysis of U.S. policy indicates that the United States acts hypocritically by accepting compromises on the very moral principals to which it claims to be the protectorate of, when domestic political costs are high. The sacrifice of national values degrades the credibility of the moral high ground necessary for U.S. policy. This study reviews the events that occurred during the three major periods in U.S.-Baltic relations: The initial period of Baltic independence following World War I; the Soviet annexation of the Baltics during World War II; and finally the beginning of the second period of Baltic independence during the breakup of the Soviet Union. In all three cases, U.S. policy was unclear and contradictory. The Baltic case provides a good example of the tendency for U.S. policy to be paradoxical and ineffective. This study concludes that despite the U.S. policy of nonrecognition ofthe Soviet annexation of the Baltic states during the Cold War, the United States failed to adhere to its principals when given the opportunity. In the process, it also neglected problems within its borders that required attention perhaps more urgently than those outside. The tendency for U.S. policy to ignore the issues that actually threaten its security internally and placing a higher priority on external matters that do not have a real impact on its standing could likely lead to its inadvertent downfall. v VI TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 II. U.S. POLICY AND THE BALTIC STATES, 1918-1923 ..................................................... 3 A. WILSON'S PRINCIPLES .......................................................................................... 3 B. U.S. POLICY AND RUSSIA. .................................................................................... 6 C. EVENTS IN THE BALTIC STATES ........................................................................ 8 D. U.S. BALTIC POLICY ............................................................................................ 10 III. SOVIET INCORPORATION OF THE BALTICS AND U.S. NONRECOGNITION, 1939-1988 ........................................................................................................................... 17 A. EVENTS IN THE BALTICS .................................................................................... 18 B. U.S. POLICY ............................................................................................................ 21 IV. THE ROLE OF BUSH'S POLICY IN THE BREAKUP OF THE SOVIET UNION .......... 29 A EVENTS IN THE BALTIC STATES ...................................................................... 31 B. U.S. POLICY AND THE BALTICS ........................................................................ 35 C. THE NUCLEARPRIORITY................................................................................... 41 V. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE U.S. POLICY BEYOND THE BALTICS ............................................................................................................................ 47 LIST OF REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 55 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST. .............................................................................................. 57 Vll Vlll EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This thesis examines U.S. foreign policy toward the Baltic states from 1918 to 1991 to determine ifthe U.S. has been realistic in its dealings with small nations. An analysis ofU.S. policy indicates that the United States acts hypocritically by accepting compromises on the very moral principals to which it claims to be the protectorate of when domestic political costs are high. The sacrifice of national values degrades the credibility of the moral high ground necessary for U.S. policy. This study reviews the events that occurred during the three major periods in U.S.-Baltic relations: The initial period ofBaltic independence following World War I; the Soviet annexation of the Baltics during World War II; and finally the beginning of the second period of Baltic independence during the breakup of the Soviet Union. In all three cases, U.S. policy was unclear and contradictory. U.S. dealings with the Baltic states provide a good example of the conflicting, ineffective tendencies in its foreign policies with small nations. Chapter I covers the period from 1918-1923 when the Baltics declared independence for the first time. President Wilson had declared his support for the right to self-determination for all nations, regardless of size in his Fourteen Points speech and several other forums. In the Baltic case however, his policy toward Russia directly contradicted his principles of freedom and democracy for all. His Russian policy took priority for the duration of his presidency even though by 1921 most ofthe rest
Recommended publications
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
  • Conde, Jonathan (2018) an Examination of Lithuania's Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation

    Conde, Jonathan (2018) an Examination of Lithuania's Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation

    Conde, Jonathan (2018) An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Masters thesis, York St John University. Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3522/ Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Research MA History at York St John University School of Humanities, Religion & Philosophy by Jonathan William Conde Student Number: 090002177 April 2018 I confirm that the work submitted is my own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the works of others. This copy has been submitted on the understanding that it is copyright material. Any reuse must comply with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and any licence under which this copy is released. @2018 York St John University and Jonathan William Conde The right of Jonathan William Conde to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Acknowledgments My gratitude for assisting with this project must go to my wife, her parents, wider family, and friends in Lithuania, and all the people of interest who I interviewed between the autumn of 2014 and winter 2017.
  • Latvia the Claim for Independence Leva JÄ Kobsone* * Desk Officer

    Latvia the Claim for Independence Leva JÄ Kobsone* * Desk Officer

    Latvia The Claim for Independence leva J�kobsone* The legal basis for de facto renewal of sovereignty of the Republic of Latvia was laid on 4 May 1990, one year before the collapse of the Soviet Union. On this date the Declaration of the Supreme Soviet of the Latvian SSR On the Renewal of the Independence of the Republic of Latvia proclaimed the renewal of independence of the State establishing a transition period for the restoration of de facto independence. The Declaration stated that the incorporation of the Republic of Latvia in the Soviet Union was illegal with respect to general principles of international law and that the Republic of Latvia continued to exist de jure as the subject of international law during the occupation by the Soviet Union. The Declaration partly restated the legal force of the constitutional basis of the pre-war Republic - the Satversme (Constitution). The Declaration expressed the desire: ' (...) To recognize the supremacy of the fundamental principles of intemafional law over national law. To consider illegal the Treaty of August 23, 1939 between the USSR and Germany, and the subsequent liquidation of the sovereignty of the Republic of Latvia on June 17, 1940 which was the result of the USSR military aggression. To declare null and void from the moment of adoption the Decision of July 21, 1940 of the Saeima of Latvia 'On the Republic of Latvia's Joining the USSR'. (...) To guarantee citizens of the Republic of Latvia and those of other States permanently residing in Latvia social, economic and Cultural rights, as well as those political rights and freedoms which comply with the universally recognized international human rights instruments (...).
  • Importance of European Remembrance for the Future of Europe

    Importance of European Remembrance for the Future of Europe

    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED P9_TA(2019)0021 Importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe European Parliament resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe (2019/2819(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the universal principles of human rights and the fundamental principles of the European Union as a community based on common values, – having regard to the statement issued on 22 August 2019 by First Vice-President Timmermans and Commissioner Jourová ahead of the Europe-Wide Day of Remembrance for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, – having regard to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10 December 1948, – having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe on 8 May 19451, – having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian Communist regimes, – having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law2, – having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism adopted on 3 June 2008, – having regard to its declaration on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Stalinism and Nazism adopted on 23 September 20083, 1 OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p. 392. 2 OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p.
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS June 15, 1983 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS FLAG DAY Colleagues Remarks Made by Dr

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS June 15, 1983 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS FLAG DAY Colleagues Remarks Made by Dr

    15978 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS FLAG DAY colleagues remarks made by Dr. since it has 92 articles, 16 of which are get­ Jacques E. Soustelle before the annual ting obsolete; but it is not obscure and HON.RAYMONDJ.McGRATH meeting of the Association of Former see1ns to fulfill the desires to both Right Members of Congress on May 24, 1983. and Left. Our democratic system compares OF NEW YORK both with the Westminster system of the IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A member of the organization of British and with the American presidential former French deputies <Group des Constitution; it is more presidential than Wednesday, June 15, 1983 Anciens Deputes), Dr. Soustelle is a the British and more parliamentary than • Mr. McGRATH. Mr. Speaker, yes­ prominent scholar who was one of the yours. terday all Americans celebrated Flag major architects of the constitution of However that may be, the French Repub­ Day, a day set aside by this Congress the Fifth Republic and a Governor lic today is a democracy, which means that as a national commemoration of the General of Algeria. During the Second my country is a member of an honorable mi­ symbol of our country. It is unfortu­ World War, he was decorated by Su­ nority in the world, but of a minority never­ preme Allied Commander Gen. theless, while totalitarian, one-party, dicta­ nate that this day is often overlooked torial, militarist regimes are supreme in by the Nation, for while its celebration Dwight D. Eisenhower for his impor­ many countries, as well as in the UN, the is not marked by a 3-day weekend or tant role in the liberation of France.
  • Exiles and Constituents: Baltic Refugees and American Cold War Politics, 1948-1960

    Exiles and Constituents: Baltic Refugees and American Cold War Politics, 1948-1960

    Exiles and Constituents: Baltic Refugees and American Cold War Politics, 1948-1960 Jonathan H. L’Hommedieu A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Turku in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Social Sciences in the Department of Contemporary History Turku 2011 Serial: Humaniora B 338 ISBN 978-951-29-4811-6 ISSN 0082-6987 Abstract Jonathan H. L’Hommedieu: Exiles and Constituents: Baltic Refugees and American Cold War Politics, 1948-1960 This dissertation explores the complicated relations between Estonian, Latvian, and Lithuanian postwar refugees and American foreign policymakers between 1948 and 1960. There were seemingly shared interests between the parties during the first decade of the Cold War. Generally, Eastern European refugees refused to recognize Soviet hegemony in their homelands, and American policy towards the Soviet bloc during the Truman and Eisenhower administrations sought to undermine the Kremlin’s standing in the region. More specifically, Baltic refugees and State Department officials sought to preserve the 1940 non-recognition policy towards the Soviet annexation of the Baltic States. I propose that despite the seemingly natural convergence of interests, the American experiment of constructing a State-Private network revolving around fostering relations with exile groups was fraught with difficulties. These difficulties ultimately undermined any ability that the United States might have had to liberate the Baltic States from the Soviet Union. As this dissertation demonstrates, Baltic exiles were primarily concerned with preserving a high level of political continuity to the interwar republics under the assumption that they would be able to regain their positions in liberated, democratic societies.
  • Transformation of Communist Media Contentand Public

    Transformation of Communist Media Contentand Public

    Contents lists available at Vilnius University Press Informacijos mokslai ISSN 1392-0561 eISSN 1392-1487 2020, vol. 90, pp. 53–79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2020.90.50 Transformation of Communist Media Content and Public Space According to the Discourse ‘39Pact: Exiting the “Labyrinth” as an Act of Communication Andrius Vaišnys Vilnius University, Faculty of Communication E-mail: [email protected] Summary. This text is about one of the longest processes of political communication, which, decades on, influences politicians of various generations of the Central, Eastern and Western Europe, contents of media and self-awareness of the audience. The process isn’t over yet, this is obvious not only from the document adopted by the EP but also from an international political rhetoric. Analysis of consequences of the Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact signed on 1939 in media (D’39Pact) and related national and international decisions is the axis of information conflict between the East and the West concerning thousands of fates. Those thousands of people had and still have different historical narratives – some people justified the Pact and implemented it, others were fighting for the elimination of its consequences, yet others fell victims to it, with a death toll estimated in the millions. But not everybody’s narratives are based on true arguments. Let’s look at the way the system of propaganda collapsed and the public opinion was transformed in countries of Central and Eastern Europe in 1988-1989. Moving from a lie to (hopefully) the historical truth. Review of consequences of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was the main axis of such transformation (protection of envi- ronmental and cultural valuables, choice of one’s viewpoint, legislative requirements and other rights were contextual aspects of this axis).
  • ALKA I. Apie Lietuvių Informacijos Centro Veiklą: II. Archyvinės

    ALKA I. Apie Lietuvių Informacijos Centro Veiklą: II. Archyvinės

    ALKA LIETUVIŲ INFORMACIJOS CENTRAS NIUJORKE (1979-1991) ARCHYVAS I. Apie lietuvių informacijos centro veiklą: G. Damušytė Lietuvių informacijos centro vaidmuo užsienyje // XXI amžiaus horizontai .- 2007m.sausio 10d. – Nr. 1 (138) II. Archyvinės medžiagos turinys Dėžės nr., Bylos pavadinimas Bylos turinys pavadinimas ABC - TV Amerikos TV kompanija apie 1 įvykius Lietuvoje American Federation of Labor (AFL) Dokumentai, biuletenis Afghanistan Info apie Afganistana anglų klb. Advertising Reklamos, pasiūlymai American Bar Association (ABA 2 Asociacijos biuleteniai files) American Jewish Committee American for Independent Lithuania American Lithuanian R.C.women’s žmogaus teisių tematika Alliance Anti-Defamation League Specialus raportas Assaults on lithuanian priest LIC žinios Attacks ( 2 files ) Įvykiai Lietuvoje Atrocities Dokumentiniai faktai Atheism Antireliginis mokymas Lietuvoje Australia Australijos Lietuvių organizacijos, susirašinėjimai Austria Aušros Vartai Bažnyčia Vilniuje Balance sheets Lietuvių katalikų religinės šalpos BALF’-as Susirašinėjimai su G. Damušyte dėl šalpos siuntinių Baltic American Freedom League Laiškai, konferencijos 1986m.medžiaga, baltic adresses( sulieta) Baltic Assembly, Tallin 1989,Jūrmala Rezoliucija,dokumentai,progra 1990 ma,atidarymo kalba Baltic Bulletin Baltic Forum Baltic freedom day Proklamacijos, iškarpos Baltic Council Pareiškimai, sprendimai, deklaracijos Baltic Helsinki Group Naujienos apie Latviją Baltic House Pabaltiečių namai Prancūzijoje Baltic Market Pabaltijo šalių sutartis Baltic 45 memorandum
  • La Place De La Lettonie Dans La Diplomatie Française (1918-2018) Jérémy Delaplagne

    La Place De La Lettonie Dans La Diplomatie Française (1918-2018) Jérémy Delaplagne

    La diplomatie des confins : la place de la Lettonie dans la diplomatie française (1918-2018) Jérémy Delaplagne To cite this version: Jérémy Delaplagne. La diplomatie des confins : la place de la Lettonie dans la diplomatie française (1918-2018). Science politique. 2017. dumas-01892083 HAL Id: dumas-01892083 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01892083 Submitted on 10 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vous allez consulter un mémoire réalisé par un étudiant dans le cadre de sa scolarité à Sciences Po Grenoble. L’établissement ne pourra être tenu pour responsable des propos contenus dans ce travail. Afin de respecter la législation sur le droit d’auteur, ce mémoire est diffusé sur Internet en version protégée sans les annexes. La version intégrale est uniquement disponible en intranet. SCIENCES PO GRENOBLE 1030 avenue Centrale – 38040 GRENOBLE http://www.sciencespo-grenoble.fr UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES Institut d’Etudes Politiques Jérémy DELAPLAGNE LA DIPLOMATIE DES CONFINS La place de la Lettonie dans la diplomatie française (1918-2018)
  • Baltic States' Call for Freedom; 35 Years Since the First

    Baltic States' Call for Freedom; 35 Years Since the First

    “Baltic States' call for freedom; 35 years since the first Resolution of the European Parliament supporting independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania": extracts from the speeches Reference: I-149103 Duration: 00:04:13 Location: Brussels Date: Jan 10, 2018 Type: EbS PreEdited Link: http://audiovisual.europarl.europa.eu/Assetdetail.aspx?ref=I149103 Background: MEP Mairead McGuinness, Vice President of the European Parliament, underlined the importance of the EP resolution and the bravery of the Baltic people in her opening speech at the event “Baltic States’ call for freedom heard: 35 years since the first Resolution of the European Parliament supporting independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”. The event recalled the European Parliament Resolution of 1983 in support of the Baltic States’ appeal for independency from the Soviet Union. The Resolution had drawn international attention to the ongoing illegal deportations and arrests of thousands of Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians. Moreover, the European Parliament condemned the occupation of the formerly independent and neutral Baltic States by the Soviet Union and deemed it illegal as the international society had not recognized the Soviet annexation of those countries. Summary: Mairead McGUINNESS, Vice President of the European Parliament, Andrus ANSIP, Vice-President of the EC in charge of Digital Single Market, Valdis DOMBROVSKIS, Vice-President of the EC in charge of the Euro and Social Dialogue and Vytenis ANDRIUKAITIS, Member of the EC in charge of Health and Food Safety deliver the opening speeches at the event "Baltic States' call for freedom heard: 35 years since the first Resolution of the European Parliament supporting independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania” in the EP Library Hall, Brussels.
  • En En Motion for a Resolution

    En En Motion for a Resolution

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0184/2019 25.11.2019 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statements by the Council and the Commission pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on recent actions by the Russian Federation against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the tragic events of 13 January 1991 in Vilnius (2019/2938(RSP)) Anna Fotyga, Ryszard Czarnecki, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Ruža Tomašić, Assita Kanko, Adam Bielan, Alexandr Vondra, Jan Zahradil, Evžen Tošenovský, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Veronika Vrecionová on behalf of the ECR Group RE\1193468EN.docx PE643.353v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0184/2019 European Parliament resolution on recent actions by the Russian Federation against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the tragic events of 13 January 1991 in Vilnius (2019/2938(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia, – having regard to its resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe1, – having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian Communist regimes, – having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism, adopted on 3 June 2008, – having regard to its declaration of 23 September 2008 on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS April 30, 1986 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS SANDINISTAS DENY RELIGIOUS Miguel Obando Y Bravo

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS April 30, 1986 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS SANDINISTAS DENY RELIGIOUS Miguel Obando Y Bravo

    9148 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS April 30, 1986 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS SANDINISTAS DENY RELIGIOUS Miguel Obando y Bravo ... You may be The government supports a front-organi­ FREEDOM TO THE NICARA­ sure that these attacks are an offense zation "Peoples Church" that actively pro­ GUAN PEOPLE AND PERSE­ against the Christian sentiments of the motes Marxism-Leninism. The "Peoples CUTE ROMAN CATHOLICS IN great majority of the Nicaraguan people Church" blasphemous symbol is a crucified Christ imposed on a Sandinista guerrilla NICARAGUA Since that letter was written, the situation waving a Soviet AK-47 rifle. The "Peoples has gotten even worse. Church" is largely ignored by Nicaraguan HON. JACK F. KEMP The Sandinistas' most intense anti-Catho­ Catholics, and has minuscule support from OF NEW YORK lic efforts have been directed against the the clergy. Of the approximately 880 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Church's leaders. The regime's goal has priests, nuns, and monks in the country, been to undercut popular support for the fewer than 40 are loyal to this "Church," Wednesday, April 30, 1986 Catholic bishops through vicious propagan­ and of those 40, all but 10 are foreign mis­ Mr. KEMP. Mr. Speaker, recently 22 of our da portraying them as "counterrevolution­ sionaries. colleagues, led by Congressman HENRY aries" and "enemies of the people." Cardi­ Despite this grim record, the Sandinista nal Obando has been labelled as the "anti­ regime has waged a successful disinforma­ HYDE, circulated a "Dear Colleague" letter Christ" and accused of "collaborating" with tion campaign that has convinced many calling the attention of the Members to the ac­ the Somoza government-of which he was a American Catholic bishops, the United tions of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista regime harsh critic.