<<

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE

provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector

Volume 164, number 2 FEBS 1052 December 1983

The effect of hydrophobicity of fl-lactam on their phospholipid bilayer permeability

Akihito Yamaguchi, Ryoichi Hiruma and Tetsuo Sawai

Division of Microbial Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Chiba 260, Japan

Received 17 October 1983

Phospholipid bilayer permeability of fi-lactam antibiotics was determined using liposomes enclosing ,& lactamase. There was good correlation between the permeability and hydrophobicity within the analogous &lactams. However, the effect of hydrophobic character on the permeability parameter was very different between the groups. Moderately hydrophilic such as and showed very high permeability compared with . Penicillins having hindered side chains such as and showed moderate permeability taking into account their hydrophobicity. These observations are suggestive of outer membrane permeation of these fl-lactams via routes other than the porin pore, especially in porin-deficient mutants of gram-negative bacteria.

B-Lactam Lipid-bilayer permeability Hydrophobicity Liposome Outer membrane fl-Lactamase

1. INTRODUCTION previous one [5], to determine the relationship be- tween lipid bilayer permeability and hydrophobi- Common cephalosporins and penicillins were city of ,&lactam antibiotics. demonstrated to use porin channels as a permea- tion route through the outer membrane of gram- negative bacteria in order to reach their targets in 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS the cytoplasmic membrane [l-4]. During the course of our studies on the outer membrane 2.1. &Lactam antibiotics permeation of various ,&lactam antibiotics using ,&Lactam antibiotics were a generous gift from porin-deficient mutants, we made an interesting the following pharmaceutical companies: ben- observation, namely, that some penicillins such as zylpenicillin, ampicillin, -C, diclox- ampicillin may use the hydrocarbn chain region of acillin and , Meiji Seika Co. (Tokyo); the outer membrane as a secondary permeation , , and route in addition to the porin pore [4]. This , Beecham Pharmaceutics (Surrey); assumption has been strengthened by the fact that , and , Fujisawa ampicillin easily permeates the lipid bilayer of Pharmaceutical Co. (Osaka); , Torii liposomes prepared from Escherichia coli Pharmaceutical Co. (Tokyo); cephalexin, Toyama phospholipids, whereas cefazolin and cephalor- Chemical Co. (Tokyo); oxacillin and methicillin, idine hardly penetrate this lipid bilayer [5], Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. (Tokyo); sulbenicillin, although the hydrophobicity of ampicillin is in- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. (Osaka); cefadroxyl, termediate between these cephalosporins. This in- Bristol and Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. (Tokyo); vestigation was undertaken as an extension of the , Pfizer Inc. (Groton).

Published by Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. 00145793/83/%3.00 0 1983 Federation of European Biochemical Societies 389 Volume 164, number 2 FEBS LETTERS December 1983

2.2. Preparation of liposomes with enclosed 2.4. Reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography fl-lactamase The hydrophobic character of the P-lactam an- ,&Lactamase-enclosing liposomes were prepared tibiotics was expressed by the Rf value which was in the presence of RGN823 penicillinase [6], measured by reversed-phase thin-layer chroma- RGN238 penicillinase [7] or Citrobacter freundii tography [4]. cephalosporinase [6] as in [5]. A dried mixture of 4 mg E. coli phospholipids and 0.37 mg car- 3. RESULTS diolipin (Sigma) was dispersed in 0.4 ml phosphate-buffered saline or 0.1 M phosphate The outer membrane permeability of P-lactam buffer, pH 7.0 (in the case of RGN238 - antibiotics is calculated from the rate of their ase) containing 320 units (ampicillin as substrate) hydrolysis by ,&lactamases located in the of RGN823 penicillinase, 160 units (ampicillin as periplasmic space using Fick’s law of diffusion [S]. substrate) of RGN238 penicillinase or 80 units This method was applied to the permeability (cephalothin as substrate) of C. freundii cephalo- measurement of ,&lactams through the reconstit- sporinase. The enzyme outside the lioosome was ir- uted membrane with or without porin using p- reversibly inactivated by an about 500 molar excess lactamase-containing vesicles [5,9,10]. The of clavulanic acid (for the penicillinase) or sulbac- permeability parameter determined by this method tam (for the cephalosporinase). This step is is independent of the kinetic nature of the enzyme necessary for the enzymatic assay of the used provided the substrate concentration inside permeability, since the enzyme attached on the the vesicle is well below the K, value. However, if outside surface of the liposome interfered with the significant amounts of enzyme were to become at- measurement of the rate of hydrolysis by the en- tached on the outside surface of the liposome, it trapped enzyme. The degree of inactivation of the would interfere with the calculation of the entrapped enzyme by these inhibitors was much permeability parameter. In this case, the calculated smaller than that of the enzyme outside the parameter would decrease with increasing liposome due to the action of the liposomal mem- substrate concentration outside the liposome. On brane as a permeability barrier to these inhibitors. the other hand, if the calculated parameter Finally, inhibitors and the inactivated enzymes represented the true permeability, it would be in- were removed by gel filtration. dependent of the substrate concentration outside the liposome. Fig.1 clearly shows that the former was not the case. 2.3. Determination of permeability parameter Uptake of fl-lactam antibiotics by liposomes was determined by measuring hydrolysis of @-lactams by intact liposomes using the microiodometric kc- 5E ‘iJ 3- method as in [5]. Enzyme reaction was terminated 2 ‘k‘Z 0 0 by addition of 0.15 M sodium tungstate. In this a52 - O-O- method, hydrolyzed product remaining inside the 57 0 1; c liposomes could be detectable, since the iodine fiE)- consumption remained constant before and after X-r Eb sonic disruption of the liposome. The rate of &-IL a o- hydrolysis by entrapped enzymes was corrected by 0 100 200 subtracting the hydrolysis by the supernatant of Amplcillln cont. ( PM) the liposome suspension. The permeability parameter was calculated from the ratio of the rate Fig. 1. Phospholipid bilayer permeability of ampicillin of hydrolysis by intact liposome and that of when the concentration of ampicillin outside the disrupted liposome in the presence of Triton X-100 liposomes was varied from 25 pM-2OOpM. The as in [5]. The units of the permeability parameter permeability parameter was determined as described in are min-’ -PM lipid-‘. section 2.

390 Volume 164, number 2 FEBS LETTERS December 1983

The ,&lactam antibiotics used here are listed in 7- I- p - fig.2. These ,&lactams can be classified into 3 ._ \ o= groups, namely: (i) cephalosporins; (ii) broad spectrum penicillins; (iii) penicillins having hindered 6-P side chains. The third group are ,&lactamase-resistant penicillins which show little antibacterial activity against gram-negative bacteria probably due to their low outer membrane permeability [l 1,121. The permeability of these 3 groups to liposomal membrane was mainly measured by C. jieundii cephalosporinase, RGN823 penicillinase and RGN238 penicillinase, respectively, since these combinations of enzyme and substrate were the 0 best for enzymatic assay. In addition, 3 represen- Rf value tative broad spectrum penicillins and 3 Fig.3. Phospholipid bilayer permeability of various ,19- cephalosporins were measured by RGN238 la&am antibiotics. concentration added penicillinase and RGN823 penicillinase, respective- outside the liposomes was 50pM. The permeability of ly. Fig.3 shows the plot of the permeability broad spectrum penicillins was measured by RGN823 parameter against the Rf value: the greater the penicillinase (0) or RGN238 penicillinase (0) and that hydrophobic character, the smaller the Rf value. of cephalosporins was measured by C. freundii These data clearly showed that: (i) the permeability cephalosporinase (A) or RGN823 penicillinase (A). The depended on the hydrophobicity of the molecule permeability of penicillins having hindered 6-p side within each group; while (ii) the effect of chains was measured by RGN238 penicillinase (0). a,a’ , hydrophobic character on the permeability benzylpenicillin; b, b ’ , ampicillin; c,c ’ , amoxicillin; d, parameter was very different between the groups. ticarcillin; e, sulbenicillin; f, carbenicillin; g, oxacillin; h, cloxacillin; i, ; j, methicillin; k,k ’ , Broad spectrum penicillins which are moderately cephaloridine; 1, cephalexin; m,m’, cefazoline; n,n’, hydrophilic showed much larger values for the ; p, ceftezole; q, cephalosporin-C. Rf values permeability parameter than cephalosporins hav- were obtained as described in section 2. ing similar hydrophobicity. Penicillins having hindered 6-P side chains showed intermediate permeability between broad spectrum penicillins The difference in the permeability parameters and cephalosporins. between the groups was not due to the difference in enzymes used, because the parameters of 3 representative penicillins and 3 cephalosporins when they were measured by RGN238 penicillinase and RGN823 penicillinase, respectively, showed essentially the same patterns as those measured by RGN823 penicillinase and C. freundii cephalo- sporinase, respectively (fig.3). In the former case, the calculated parameters tend to be a little smaller than when they were measured by the most ap- propriate enzymes, but the difference was less significant compared with the difference in the permeability between groups. The predicted pH drop inside the liposomes dur- ing enzymic hydrolysis of ,&lactam antibiotics also did not affect the results since the rate of hydrolysis of penicillins and cephalosporins by in-

391 Volume 164, number 2 FEBS LETTERS December 1983

different permeabilities compared with their (A) 6 hydrophobicity. The permeability properties of ,& / lactams are more complex than those of non- 0.5. 0 E electrolytes due to their own electronic properties c x 8/ even though their molecular sizes are similar. The ;0.25- difference between penicillins and cephalosporins / might be mainly attributed to the difference in is? f/ electronic properties of their nuclei such as amide it s O/ ’ resonance [ 151. The unexpectedly high phospholipid bilayer permeability of moderately hydrophilic penicillins gave a clue to understanding their relatively high outer membrane permeability to a porin-deficient mutant [4], although the result here could not be 0 10 20 40 directly extended to the membrane containing TIME (rni? lipopolysaccharides and proteins. Fig.4. (A) Hydrolysis of ampicillin (50 ,uM) by RGN823 penicillinase-containing intact liposomes (50 pM lipid) in REFERENCES the absence (0) or presence (0) of 10pM CCCP was recorded by an absorption change at 595 nm by the [l] Alphen, W.V., Boxtel, R.V., Selm, N.V. and microiodometric method. (B) Hydrolysis of cephalor- Lugtenberg, B. (1978) FEMS Microbial. Lett. 3, idine (50pM) was measured in the same way as in (A) 103-106. except that the lipid concentration was 150pM. [2] Nikaido, H., Rosenberg, E.Y. and Foulds, J. (1983) J. Bacterial. 153, 232-240. 131 Nikaido. H. and Rosenberg, E.Y. (1983) J. tact liposomes was not altered by addition of a Bacterial, 153, 241-252. protonophore, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl- 141 Sawai, T., Hiruma, R., Kawana, N., Kaneko, M., hydrazone (CCCP) during the course of enzymic Taniyasu, F. and Inami, F. (1982) Antimicrob. hydrolysis (fig.4). In addition, the pH drop inside Agents Chemother. 22, 585-592. the liposome could not be detected by continuous- 151 Yamaguchi, A., Hiruma, R. and Sawai, T. (1982) flow dialysis using methylamine (not shown). J. Antibiot. 35, 1692-1699. These observations supported the view that the PI Sawai, T., Kanno, M. and Tsukamoto, K. (1982) J. difference in the permeability observed in this ex- Bacterial. 152, 567-571. periment reflects the true difference in lipid-bilayer 171 Yamagishi, S., O’Hara, K., Sawai, T. and Mitsuhashi, S. (1969) J. Biochem. 66, 11-20. permeability of 3 groups of @-lactam antibiotics. 181 Zimmerman, W. and Rosselet, A. (1977) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12, 368-372. 191 Barbas, J.A., Rodriguez-Tebar, A. and Vasquez, 4. DISCUSSION D. (1982) FEBS Lett. 146, 381-384. 1101 Kobayashi, Y., Takahashi, I. and Nakae, T. (1982) When molecules pass through a lipid bilayer Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22, 775-780. membrane via a solubility-diffusion mechanism, 1111 Sawai, T. and Yoshida, T. (1982) J. Antibiot. 35, the permeability coefficient is governed by the pro- 1072-1077; cf. Murakami, K. and Yoshida, T. duct of the partition coefficient between hydrocar- (1982) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21, bon solvent and water and the diffusion constant 254-258. Vaara, M. and Vaara, T. (1983) Nature 303, in the membrane [13]. Of those two factors, the WI 526-528. partition coefficient is predominant [14]. We 1131 Finkelstein, A. (1976) J. Gen. Physiol. 68, showed the proportionality between lipid-bilayer 127-135. permeability and hydrophobicity within the struc- 1141 Orbach, E. and Finkelstein, A. (1980) J. Gen. turally analogous &lactams. On the other hand, Physiol. 75, 427-436. broad spectrum penicillins, cephalosporins and 1151 Sweet, R.M. and Dahl, L.F. (1970) J. Am. Chem. penicillins have hindered side chains showed very Sot. 92, 5489-5507.

392