DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Impact Annual Monitoring Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Impact Annual Monitoring Report 2015 Social Impact Monitoring Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora Annual Monitoring Report 2015 pg. 1 Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora. Social Impact Monitoring: Third Annual Report 2015. June 2016 The baseline, 2013 and 2014 reports were prepared by Dianne Buchan and Chris Cosslett of Corydon Consultants Ltd. This 2015 report is an update of those reports by Quigley and Watts Ltd, drawing on the 2015 data collected by Corydon Consultants Ltd and on the text and layout of the previous authors. Substantial additions include an analysis of data, chapter summaries and overall assessments. Consequently an Executive Summary is now presented. Finally, all reports have been undertaken in accordance with conditions of designation set by the Board of Inquiry for the construction of the Auckland South Corrections Facility (Kohuora) at Wiri. Cover design by Rev Mark Beale, Member of the Community Impact Forum Social Impact Monitoring 2015 Third Annual Report – ARWCF and ASCF Kohuora i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Document deliverables for phases 1 and 2 of the Social Impact Monitoring Plan .................... 4 1.2 Contractual and report changes compared with previous years ...................................................... 4 2. Housing and accommodation ............................................................................................... 6 2.1 Rental housing ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1 HNZC housing waiting lists .................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2 Private rental housing ......................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 ASCF construction worker housing and ARWCF employee housing .................................. 10 2.1.4 Housing of prisoner families, offenders and Steps to Freedom programme ..................... 11 2.2 Overcrowding ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Emergency/temporary housing ................................................................................................. 13 2.3.1 Demand for emergency accommodation .......................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Long-term residents at caravan parks ............................................................................... 14 2.4 Demand for Supported Accommodation Service...................................................................... 15 3. Schools and pre-schools ....................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Number of children enrolled at schools with a caregiver employed or imprisoned at ARWCF 18 3.3 Turnover rates in school rolls .................................................................................................... 19 3.4 Special needs students .............................................................................................................. 22 3.4.1 Number of special needs students ..................................................................................... 22 3.4.2 Resource Teacher: Learning and Behaviour Unit (RTLB) ................................................... 24 3.4.3 Number of special needs of pre-school children ................................................................ 26 3.4.4 Ministry of Education’s Psychological Service for students ............................................... 27 3.5 Unjustified absence e.g. truancy ............................................................................................... 29 3.5.1 Truancy incidents ............................................................................................................... 29 3.5.2 Number of truants ............................................................................................................. 29 3.5.3 Referral to Attendance Services ........................................................................................ 30 3.6 Pre-school occupancy and enrolments ..................................................................................... 31 4. Local NGO support services ................................................................................................. 32 4.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 32 4.2 General NGO social support services ........................................................................................ 33 4.2.1 Number of volunteers and number of hours delivered to ARWCF prisoners ..................... 33 4.2.2 Service usage of local NGOs .............................................................................................. 34 4.3 Maori cultural services .............................................................................................................. 36 4.4 Child Travel Fund or Whānau Transport ................................................................................... 37 5. Local health services ............................................................................................................. 38 5.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 39 5.2 Services affected by prisoner health requirements .................................................................. 39 5.2.1 On-site visits by health providers....................................................................................... 39 5.2.2 Visits to off-site health providers ....................................................................................... 40 5.2.3 Mason Clinic inpatients and outpatients ........................................................................... 41 5.3 Demands on primary health clinics ........................................................................................... 42 5.3.1 Numbers of enrolled patients at each clinic ...................................................................... 42 5.3.2 Specialist services at Raukura Hauora O Tainui ................................................................ 43 5.4 Stand Children’s Services (formerly Pakuranga Health Camp) ................................................. 45 Social Impact Monitoring 2015 Third Annual Report – ARWCF and ASCF Kohuora ii 5.5 St Johns Ambulance................................................................................................................... 46 5.6 Health services provided to the Korowai Manaaki Youth Justice Facility ................................. 47 Table 34: Youth Justice Facility: onsite consultations by health service providers ....................... 47 Table 35: Youth Justice Facility: Off-site treatments (average per month) ................................... 47 6. Local employment and economy....................................................................................... 48 6.1 Employment opportunities at the Corrections facilities ........................................................... 48 6.1.1 ASCF – Kohuora construction workforce ........................................................................... 48 6.2 Employment and training opportunities for ARWCF prisoners ................................................ 50 6.3 Demand for local goods and services ........................................................................................ 51 7. Community safety and wellbeing ..................................................................................... 52 7.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 53 7.2 Crime rates ................................................................................................................................ 53 7.3 Domestic violence ..................................................................................................................... 54 7.4 Graffiti and vandalism ............................................................................................................... 55 7.5 Gang presence in the local community ..................................................................................... 55 7.6 Probation services, probation compliance and rehabilitation services .................................... 57 7.6.1 Probation services ............................................................................................................. 57 7.6.2 Community Probation Compliance .................................................................................... 58 7.6.3 Rehabilitation services
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment Manurewa Open Space Netw
    Manurewa Open Space Network Plan August 2018 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of the network plan ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Strategic context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Manurewa Local Board area ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Current State ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Treasure ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Enjoy ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Connect .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
    [Show full text]
  • Manurewa Te Rīpoata Ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020
    Te Poari ā-Rohe o Manurewa Te Rīpoata ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020 Volume 2.10 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Mihi He kōrero mō tēnei rīpoata Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e Let this vessel that carries my greetings travel About this report uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga by way of the Tāmaki River to the landing place o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. of Tainui canoe at Ōtāhuhu. This annual report tells the story of how Auckland Council has I reira ka tōia aku mihi ki te uru There, let my salutations be borne across the performed in delivering services in the Manurewa Local Board area ki te Pūkaki Tapu o Poutūkeka, isthmus to the Pūkaki lagoon, from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020. i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. there is the place, Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka o Hoturoa Paddling the Manukau Harbour You can read about our progress, expenditure, service CONTENTS performance and challenges faced in 2019/2020. ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. we follow the Āwhitu Peninsula to the headland. It’s part of the wider annual reporting package for Mihi ................................................................... 2 I konā, ka rere taku haere mā te ākau From there we fly down coast the Auckland Council Group and meets our Local Government Act 2002 obligations to report on our ki te pūaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, to the Waikato river mouth, About this report ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014
    Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey Survey Report 2014 Cover image: Toetoe, Roscommon Road, Papatoetoe Auckland Council, 2014 Recommended citation: Auckland Council Heritage Unit (2014). Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey: Survey Report. Auckland Council. © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • 12-105 Back from Proof Reader
    Inquiry RO-2012-105: Unsafe recovery from wrong-route at Wiri Junction, 31 August 2012 The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is an independent Crown entity established to determine the circumstances and causes of accidents and incidents with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Accordingly it is inappropriate that reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The Commission may make recommendations to improve transport safety. The cost of implementing any recommendation must always be balanced against its benefits. Such analysis is a matter for the regulator and the industry. These reports may be reprinted in whole or in part without charge, providing acknowledgement is made to the Transport Accident Investigation Commission. Final Report Rail inquiry RO-2012-105 Unsafe recovery from wrong-route at Wiri Junction, 31 August 2012 Approved for publication: April 2016 Transport Accident Investigation Commission About the Transport Accident Investigation Commission The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (Commission) is a standing commission of inquiry and an independent Crown entity responsible for inquiring into maritime, aviation and rail accidents and incidents for New Zealand, and co-ordinating and co-operating with other accident investigation organisations overseas. The principal purpose of its inquiries is to determine the circumstances and causes of occurrences with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Its purpose is not to ascribe blame to any person or agency or to pursue (or to assist an agency to pursue) criminal, civil or regulatory action against a person or agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Maori Gardening: an Archaeological Perspective
    Maori gardening An archaeological perspective Louise Furey Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand Cover: Pa, stone row enclosures and puke (garden mounds) at Waikekeno, Wairarapa. Photo: Kevin L. Jones, DOC. © Copyright October 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 0–478–14122–X This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing by Lynette Clelland and Amanda Todd, and layout by Amanda Todd. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Maori cultigens 10 2.1 Kumara 10 2.2 Taro 13 2.3 Yam 14 2.4 Gourd 14 2.5 Ti pore 15 2.6 Aute 16 3. Gardening techniques 17 3.1 Garden location 17 3.2 Garden size 17 3.3 Fallowing 18 3.4 Garden preparation 18 3.5 Soil additives 19 4. Limitations to growth of Maori cultigens 20 5. Archaeological evidence of Maori gardening 23 5.1 Stone structures 24 5.1.1 Stone walls and rows 24 5.1.2 Stone alignments 31 5.1.3 Stone heaps 31 5.1.4 Stone mounds 31 5.1.5 Stone facing 34 5.2 Ditches and trenches 34 5.2.1 Steep-slope trenches 36 5.2.2 Trenches on gentle slopes 38 5.2.3 Trench boundary divisions 39 5.2.4 Wetland ditches 40 5.3 Borrow pits 44 5.4 Garden soils 46 5.5 Garden terraces 52 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiri to Westfield the Case for Investment
    Wiri to Westfield The Case for Investment WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff DECEMBER 2016 Wiri to Westfield (W2W) – The Case for Investment CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... E PART A – THE CASE FOR THE PROJECT ....................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Developed in Collaboration............................................................................................. 8 2 Strategic Context ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 National Context ............................................................................................................ 11 2.2 W2W A Major Constraint in the National Network ...................................................... 11 2.3 Regional Context ........................................................................................................... 12 W2W Rail Network .................................................................................................................. 12 Strategic Road Network
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Pipelines in the Auckland Urban Area 02
    DIAL BEFORE YOU WORK AND STAY SAFE Transmission pipelines in the Auckland urban area 02 High pressure natural gas and petroleum product transmission pipelines are one of the safest and most efficient ways of transporting these energy resources. However, like all forms of transporting energy they must be treated with respect so that accidents can be prevented. This booklet provides information about the First Gas owned and managed transmission pipelines in urban Auckland, such as, the pipeline locations, safety features and what do in the unlikely event of an emergency. It also provides information about the safe working practices and procedures that must be followed when working near transmission pipelines. The pipeline owners take pipeline safety seriously and utilise many resources to ensure that the pipelines are protected. The greatest risk to pipelines is damage by third parties, most commonly the use of excavation and thrust boring equipment. You can help us keep the pipelines safe by following our work and safety procedures, and looking out for any digging activity or heavy machinery operating in the vicinity of the pipelines. 03 CONTENTS Transmission pipelines in Auckland .....................................................................................................04 Auckland pipeline routes .........................................................................................................................................04 Transmission pipeline locations ..................................................................................................................06
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2 Ports of Auckland – the Base Case
    Disclaimer- This report was prepared for Sapere Research Group, to inform their work on the Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy. It does not represent the views of the Ministry of Transport. Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy Infrastructure Gary Blick and David Moore 30 June 2020 Contents Glossary of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Purpose and scope............................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Purpose of this report ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Scope of this report .................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Steps in the analysis ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Period of analysis ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mclaughlins Quarry, Wiri: Final Report on Archaeological Investigations (Site R11/47)
    MCLAUGHLINS QUARRY, WIRI: FINAL REPORT ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS (SITE R11/47) In Fulfilment of NZHPT Authority No. 2007/351 Report prepared for McLaughlins Quarry Trust By Simon Bickler (PhD) Rod Clough (PhD) Barry Baquié (MA Hons) Ben Pick (MA Hons) January 2013 Clough & Associates Ltd. [email protected] 321 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua AUCKLAND 0612 Telephone: (09) 814 1946 Mobile 0274 850 059 www.clough.co.nz EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background In 2007, McLaughlins Quarry Trust (MQT) obtained consent to extend their and Results Wiri Quarry. An assessment of effects carried out by Clough & Associates (Clough 2007a) determined that several archaeological features relating to recorded archaeological site R11/47, which includes terraces, middens and gardening features, would be impacted on. An NZHPT Authority to modify part of site R11/47 was granted in October 2007 (no. 2007/351). The Authority was conditional on preservation of some zones of archaeology and the investigation of specified areas of R11/47 including Zone A and parts of Zones B and C. Archaeological monitoring of earthworks that might affect archaeological sites was also a requirement. This is the final report for the Authority and includes the results of: Investigation of Zone B in 2008. Archaeological monitoring of topsoil stripping for quarry activities in 2008-2009 Investigation of a garden area in Zone C in 2011. The archaeological remains exposed were limited, but included two or three remnant pits, stone alignments and other stone features, cooking and food preparation areas represented by fire-cracked rock and midden. The remains in Zone B suggest that a small whare had been built on a knoll above a lagoon and an area of cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiri to Quay Park (W2QP): Archaeological Desktop Assessment
    Wiri to Quay Park (W2QP): archaeological desktop assessment report to Kiwirail Hayley Glover CFG Heritage Ltd. 132 Symonds St Eden Terrace Auckland 1010 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Wiri to Quay Park (W2QP): archaeological desktop assessment report to Kiwirail Prepared by: Hayley Glover Reviewed by: Date: 25 June 2020 Matthew Campbell Reference: 20 -1137 © CFG Heritage Ltd. 2020 CFG Heritage Ltd. 132 Symonds St Eden Terrace Auckland 1010 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Wiri to Quay Park (W2QP): archaeological desktop assessment 1 Introduction Kiwirail propose upgrading the North Island Main Trunk (NIMT) between Quay Park and Wiri, including the installation of a third main from Wiri to Westfield Junction, as well as new sections of track at the Quay Park freight yard and part of Tamaki Drive. There are 9 archaeological sites recorded in the New Zealand Archaeological Association (NZAA) Site Recording Scheme (SRS) within 200 m of the proposed works areas. An archaeological assessment of effects is required in support of archaeo- logical authority applications to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT). Michelle Grinlinton- Hancock of Kiwirail commissioned this assessment from CFG Heritage. 1.1 Statutory Requirements All archaeological sites, whether recorded or not, are protected by the provisions of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and may not be destroyed, damaged or modified without an authority issued by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT). An archaeological site is defined in the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act as: (a) any place in New Zealand, including any building or structure (or part of a building or struc- ture), that — (i) was associated with human activity that occurred before 1900 or is the site of the wreck of any vessel where the wreck occurred before 1900; and (ii) provides or may provide, through investigation by archaeological methods, evidence relat- ing to the history of New Zealand; and (b) includes a site for which a declaration is made under section 43(1).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Proposed
    Draft Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Proposed Men’s Correctional Facility At Wiri Draft report and decision produced under section 149Q of the Resource Management Act Volume 1 of 2 Published by the Board of Inquiry into The Proposed Men’s Correctional Facility at Wiri Publication number: EPA 0010 ISBN 978-0-478-34856-9 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-34857-6 (electronic ISBN 978-0-478-34858-3 (CD) BOARD OF INQUIRY PROPOSED MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AT WIRI In the Matter of The Resource Management Act And In the Matter of a referral to a Board of Inquiry under s149J of the Act of an application by the Minister of Corrections to alter Designation 288 THE BOARD OF INQUIRY Judge M Harland (Chair) Deputy Chief Judge C Fox D Hill L Auton W Burrill Prepared in July 2011 Appearances: MR S QUINN and MS K ANDERSON Counsel for Department of Corrections MR R ENRIGHT and MS H O’CONNELL Counsel for Wiri Oil Services Limited and Te Kawerau Iwi Tribal Authority Inc MR G LANNING and MR W BANGMA Counsel for Auckland Transport MR P O’DRISCOLL Counsel for Te Akitai Waiohua MS M DICKEY and MR M ALLAN Counsel for Auckland Council and the Manurewa Local Board MS S SIMONS, Ms J VAN DEN BURGEN AND SISTER M MARTIN Counsel for Vision Manukau MS J CAMPBELL Counsel for Investment Property Holdings Limited Partnership MS P FORDYCE Counsel appointed by the Board as Friend of Submitters MR J MAASSEN Counsel appointed to assist the Board of Inquiry MR R GUNSTON AND MR R BROOKING as representatives of Prison Fellowship New Zealand MR G SMITH as representative
    [Show full text]
  • Wiri Logistics Estate
    Now Leasing Wiri Logistics Estate The Wiri Logistics Estate is located at the logistics and distribution epicentre of Auckland at the intersection of the South-Western Motorway and Roscommon Road. Within 26km of the Auckland CBD and 8km of the airport, this estate has the flexibility to accommodate users up to 80,000sqm. Prominent tenants in the locality include Orora, Foodstuffs, Nestle, The Warehouse, Visy, Croxley, Wesfarmers and Countdown. Now 4,000-60,000sqm c.147,000sqm Availability Site area still available GLA available SCHEDULE OF AREAS 1 Site Area - COMMITTED 26,683m² Warehouse & Office 1 15,132m² 2A Site Area - COMMITTED 43,930m² Warehouse & Office 2A 14,810m² 2B Site Area 10,647m² Warehouse 2B 5,700m² WAREHOUSE Office 2B 250m² 2B WAREHOUSE 2A WAREHOUSE SITE COMMITTED 3 2C Site Area 10,797m² Warehouse 2C 5,700m² WAREHOUSE 1 SITE COMMITTED Office 2C 250m² WAREHOUSE 2C 3 Site Area 26,408m² Warehouse 3 15,500m² WAREHOUSE 4 Office 3 500m² 4 Site Area 21,392m² Warehouse 4 13,000m² Office 4 500m² 5A Site Area 18,126m² Warehouse 5A 10,150m² WAREHOUSE 6 Office 5A 350m² 5B Site Area 19,153m² WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE Warehouse 5B 12,250m² 5B 5A Office 5B 350m² 6 Site Area 41,092m² Warehouse 6 27,600m² Office 6 700m² Access Nestle Frucor Suntory 26 km South-Western Motorway Auckland CBD* Main Trunk Line 8 km Auckland Airport* Roscommon Road Inland Port Polarcold Wiri Station Road 27 km Ports of Auckland* Fuso Wiri Logistics Estate Orora Group 1 km South Western Motorway* Visy *distances approximate 7 Unprecedented location for Immediate connection
    [Show full text]