DOCSLIB.ORG

Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014 Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey Survey Report 2014 Cover image: Toetoe, Roscommon Road, Papatoetoe Auckland Council, 2014 Recommended citation: Auckland Council Heritage Unit (2014). Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey: Survey Report. Auckland Council. © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study area ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.1 Survey team ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Other contributors ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Context of the survey ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 Planning framework ................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2 Developing the AHS programme ........................................................................................ 6 1.4.3 Pilot historic heritage surveys ............................................................................................. 6 2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 General approach ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Selecting the survey area, boundaries and levels .............................................................. 7 2.1.2 Engagement and consultation ............................................................................................. 7 2.1.3 Research ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.4 Fieldwork ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Survey modules ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Historical and thematic overview ....................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Historic heritage ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.3 Special character............................................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Community values ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2.5 Issues mapping ................................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Constraints .............................................................................................................................. 13 3.0 SURVEY RESULTS ....................................................................................... 13 3.1 Historic and thematic context overview ............................................................................... 13 3.2 Historic heritage and special character ................................................................................ 15 3.2.1 Existing historic heritage places ........................................................................................ 16 3.2.2 Existing special character areas ....................................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Study list and prioritisation ................................................................................................ 18 3.1.5 Community values ............................................................................................................. 20 3.1.6 Issues mapping ................................................................................................................. 20 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 23 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Report Final 1 Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 26 FIGURES Figure 1: Papatoetoe HHS Level 2 boundary……………………………………………………………… 4 Figure 2: Fieldwork map examples …………………………………………………………………………. 9 Figure 3: Information leaflet…………………………………………………………………………………..12 Figure 4: Existing historic heritage places, special character area and pre-1944 building demolition control overlay………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 TABLES Table 1: Summary of Priority 1 places of interest………………………………………………………….18 Table 2: SWOT analysis of Papatoetoe HHS………………………………………………………………20 Table 3: Recommendations (short-term = 1-2 years, medium-term = 2-5 years, long-term = 5+ years)……………………………………………………………………………………………………………23 Survey Report Final 2 Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey (HHS) is part of the broader Auckland Heritage Survey (AHS) programme that identifies, understands and manages heritage throughout Auckland. Led by the Auckland Council Heritage Unit, the AHS is a multi-year programme that helps implement the Auckland Plan by increasing survey coverage of the region, increasing the number of places on the heritage schedule, and gaining community satisfaction with the council’s management of historic heritage. The AHS programme uses a survey methodology guided by the Historic Heritage Area Assessments: Draft Interim Guidance (October 2012), to ensure consistency in how historic heritage places throughout Auckland are identified and evaluated. This methodology was used to create the Level 2 Papatoetoe HHS. 1.1 Purpose and scope The purpose of the Papatoetoe HHS was to carry out a Level 2 survey of the Papatoetoe portion of Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board area. The level 2 (Rapid), reconnaissance level survey involved research, documentation, identification and recommendations for potential historic heritage places, special character and community values within Papatoetoe, in order to identify and better understand the area’s heritage values. The Papatoetoe Level 2 HHS intends to provide the foundation for ongoing study, by improving our understanding of historic heritage and enabling recommendations for future management, including places and areas for a Level 3 survey. The scope of this study followed the AHS programme methodology for Level 2 surveys, and included the following: • Preparation of a Historic Context Statement, supported by appropriate maps and a list of proposed themes. • Identification and mapping of existing and recorded historic heritage places and areas, sites of significance to mana whenua and natural heritage features. • Creation of a “study List” of potential historic heritage places1 that may be eligible for scheduling, and areas that may be eligible for a special character overlay using the prioritisation tool. • Engagement with the local community, including the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board, local historical societies and stakeholders and members of the public. • Preparation of a high-level “Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats” (SWOT) analysis, relevant to the area and provides strategic management recommendations. 1.2 Study area The Papatoetoe HHS boundary (Figure 1) includes the Papatoetoe subdivision of the Ōtara- Papatoetoe Local Board area. It covers an area of over 2,200 hectares and unites approximately 10,600 parcel boundaries. The area is loosely bordered by the Manukau Harbour, Tamaki River, south-western motorway and southern motorway, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Word from the Principal Mangere
    Mangere College Term 3 Newsletter 2017 A word from the Principal It was great to see so many whanau at the recent PST’s. We always have very high numbers of families at these events and it is very positive to see all of the conversations happening. Many of our students are well on track to achieve our goal this year of 14+ credits for every student in every course and we are putting in place ways to help those students who are not on track. One of the biggest factors that help students to achieve is the support they receive from home. We really appreciate the effort that you make to support your child and we know it can make a big difference. Here are some things that you can do at home: · Ask your child how they are doing at school · Keep up to date with the number of credits they have and what is coming up · Talk to them after each exam or assessment about how it went · Support them when they have important exams and assessments The KAMAR app is very useful to stay up-to-date with how your child is going at school. If you did not receive a letter about the app at your PST then please contact the school. Tom Webb Principal of Mangere College Inside this issue: Welcome to new Staff.....................................................p2 NCEA Update/Library......................................................p3 Physical Education...........................................................p4 The Wholehearted/Wood Technology...................p5 Spirit of Adventure...........................................................p6/7 Shadow Tech
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Census Results. Asian People in Auckland
    Asian people in Auckland 2018 Census results The 2018 New Zealand Census of Population and The Asian ethnic group is Dwellings was held on 6 March 2018. This is the official count by Stats NZ of how many people and diverse dwellings there are in New Zealand. Over a third (36.0%) of the Auckland Asian This information sheet provides an overview of population identified as Chinese and 32.3% as initial results from the census for people in the Indian. A smaller proportion (7.4%) identified broad Asian ethnic group. Ethnicity is self- as Filipino and a further 5.7% as Korean. perceived, and a person can be part of more than Largest Asian ethnic groups living in Auckland one ethnic group. Asian is the fastest growing ethnic group At the 2018 Census there were 442,671 usual residents in Auckland who identified with an Asian ethnicity (28.2% of Auckland’s population). This is an increase of 135,447 people, or 44.1%, since the 2013 Census. The Asian population has grown more rapidly than the wider Auckland population. Population growth (2013 to 2018) Percentages are within the total Asian ethnic group in Auckland. Asian Level 4 ethnic groups (those with percentage >= 1% in Auckland). People could choose more than one ethnicity Over two thirds of New Zealand’s Chinese, Indian and Korean populations live in Auckland, compared to a quarter (25.5%) of those who identify as European. Proportion of the Asian population living in Auckland MELAA refers to Middle Eastern, Latin American and African. People could choose more than one ethnicity and categories are not exclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Report but That No Separate Evidence Or Representation of These Submissions Would Be Presented at the Hearing
    PROPOSED CHANGE 14 TO THE AUCKLAND REGIONAL POLICY STATEMENT – EXTENSION TO THE METROPOLITAN URBAN LIMITS, TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREA 6A AND 6B PROPOSED VARIATION 3 TO THE PROPOSED AUCKLAND REGIONAL PLAN: AIR, LAND AND WATER – EXTENSION TO THE URBAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT AREAS AND INDUSTRIAL AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT AREAS, TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREA 6A AND 6B. PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 15 TO THE AUCKLAND COUNCIL DISTRICT PLAN (PAPAKURA SECTION) – REZONING 53.3 HA OF LAND IN TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREA 6 FROM RURAL TAKANINI/DRURY (FUTURE URBAN UNDER PC13) TO INDUSTRIAL 1 AND 3, RESIDENTIAL 1 AND 8 AND RESERVE ZONES. NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT 047 – DESIGNATION SOUGHT FOR A PUBLIC WORK (STORMWATER POND) From: The Hearings Commissioners Mr Greg Hill (Chair), Ms Patricia Fordyce, Ms Dorothy Wakeling and Ms Caroline Conroy (Papakura Local Board Member) Date: 21st March 2012 CONTENTS 1.0 Summary of the Decision 2.0 Delegation 3.0 Introduction/Overview 4.0 Notification/ Submissions/Further Submissions/Hearings Process 5.0 The Auckland Council - Organisational Changes and Submitter status changes 6.0 Statutory Requirements 7.0 Structure and Contents of this Report 8.0 Submissions to other Plan Changes 9.0 Support for the Changes Page 1 of 163 Proposed Change 15 To The Auckland Council District Plan (Papakura Section) 10.0 Index of Submitters and Further Submitters by Name and Topic 11.0 Consideration of Submissions and Further Submissions. 11.1 Submissions Relating to The National, Regional and District Context and Legislative 11.2 Submissions Relating
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Line Ttbooklet Jul2018.Indd 2-3 24/07/18 10:09 AM to Britomart Via Ellerslie and Newmarket to Britomart Via Ellerslie and Newmarket
    to Britomart via Ellerslie and Newmarket to Britomart via Ellerslie and Newmarket Penrose Penrose Pukekohe Papakura Takanini Te Mahia Manurewa Homai Puhinui Papatoetoe Middlemore Otahuhu (Platform 1) Ellerslie Greenlane Remuera Newmarket Parnell Britomart Pukekohe Papakura Takanini Te Mahia Manurewa Homai Puhinui Papatoetoe Middlemore Otahuhu (Platform 1) Ellerslie Greenlane Remuera Newmarket Parnell Britomart Monday to Friday Monday to Friday (continued) - 05:14 05:18 05:20 05:22 05:25 05:31 05:33 05:36 05:39 05:44 05:47 05:49 05:52 05:55 05:59 06:04 - 15:24 15:28 15:30 15:32 15:35 15:41 15:43 15:46 15:49 15:54 15:57 15:59 16:02 16:05 16:09 16:14 05:13 05:29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:13 15:29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 05:34 05:38 05:40 05:42 05:45 05:51 05:53 05:56 05:59 06:04 06:07 06:09 06:12 06:15 06:19 06:24 - 15:34 15:38 15:40 15:42 15:45 15:51 15:53 15:56 15:59 16:04 16:07 16:09 16:12 16:15 16:19 16:24 - 05:54 05:58 06:00 06:02 06:05 06:11 06:13 06:16 06:19 06:24 06:27 06:29 06:32 06:35 06:39 06:44 15:21 15:37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 05:43 05:59 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:42 15:46 15:48 15:50 15:53 16:00 16:02 16:05 16:09 16:14 16:17 16:19 16:22 16:25 16:29 16:34 - 06:04 06:08 06:10 06:12 06:15 06:21 06:23 06:26 06:29 06:34 06:37 06:39 06:42 06:45 06:49 06:54 - 15:54 15:58 16:00 16:02 16:05 16:11 16:13 16:16 16:19 16:24 16:27 16:29 16:32 16:35 16:39 16:44 - 06:12 06:16 06:18 06:20 06:23 06:30 06:32 06:35 06:39 06:44 06:47 06:49 06:52 06:55 06:59 07:04 15:43 15:59 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 06:03 06:19
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA
    Auckland plan targets: monitoring report 2015 WITH DATA FOR THE SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 With Data for the Southern Initiative Area March 2016 Technical Report 2016/007 Auckland Council Technical Report 2016/007 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-9941350-0-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-9941350-1-8 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Submitted for review on 26 February 2016 Review completed on 18 March 2016 Reviewed by one reviewer. Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Lucy Baragwanath Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit Date: 18 March 2016 Recommended citation Wilson, R., Reid, A and Bishop, C (2016). Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with data for the Southern Initiative area. Auckland Council technical report, TR2016/007 Note This technical report updates and replaces Auckland Council technical report TR2015/030 Auckland Plan Targets: monitoring report 2015 which does not contain data for the Southern Initiative area. © 2016 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Ōtara-Papatoetoe Area Plan December 2014 TABLE of CONTENTS TATAI KORERO
    BC3685 THE OTARA-PAPATOETOE REA PLA MAHERE A ROHE O OTARA-PAPATOETOE DECEMBER 2014 HE MIHI Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. I reira ka toia aku mihi ki te uru ki te Pūkaki-Tapu-a-Poutūkeka, i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka a Hoturoa ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. I kona ka rere taku haere mā te ākau ki te puaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, Waikato Taniwharau, he piko he taniwha. Ka hīkoi anō aku mihi mā te taha whakararo mā Maioro ki Waiuku ki Mātukureira kei kona ko ngā Pā o Tahuna me Reretewhioi. Ka aro whakarunga au kia tau atu ki Pukekohe. Ka tahuri te haere a taku reo ki te ao o te tonga e whāriki atu rā mā runga i ngā hiwi, kia taka atu au ki Te Paina, ki te Pou o Mangatāwhiri. Mātika tonu aku mihi ki a koe Kaiaua te whākana atu rā ō whatu mā Tīkapa Moana ki te maunga tapu o Moehau. Ka kauhoetia e aku kōrero te moana ki Maraetai kia hoki ake au ki uta ki Ōhuiarangi, heteri mō Pakuranga. I reira ka hoki whakaroto ake anō au i te awa o Tāmaki ma te taha whakarunga ki te Puke o Taramainuku, kei konā ko Ōtara. Kātahi au ka toro atu ki te Manurewa a Tamapohore, kia whakatau aku mihi mutunga ki runga o Pukekiwiriki kei raro ko Papakura ki konā au ka whakatau.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Three, Part 16 – Takanini Structure Plan Area
    Section Three, Part 16 – Takanini Structure Plan Area PART 16 TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREA 16.1 Residential 8 zone 16.1.1 Objectives and Policies 16.1.2 Rules: General 16.1.3 Rules: Activity Status – Subdivision (Except within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre) 16.1.4 Rules: Activity Status – Subdivision within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre 16.1.5 Rules: Activity Status – Development (Except within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre) 16.1.6 Assessment Criteria (Except development within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre) 16.1.7 Rules: Activity Status – Development within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre 16.1.8 Assessment Criteria (Development within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre) 16.1.9 Rules: Performance Standards for Permitted Activities 16.1.10 Rules: Performance Standards for Specified Restricted Discretionary Activities (Excluding Development Within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre) 16.1.11 Rules: Performance Standards - Development Within the Addison Neighbourhood Centre 16.1.12 Changes to the McLennan Plan in Appendix 16AA 16.2 Residential 8A and 8b zones 16.2.1 Objectives and Policies 16.2.2 Rules: General 16.2.3 Rules: Subdivision 16.2.4 Rules: Activity Status 16.2.5 Assessment Criteria 16.2.6 Rules: Performance Standards for Permitted Activities 16.3 Reserves & Community Uses zone Auckland Council District Plan (Papakura Section) – Section Three, Urban Papakura 16/1 Section Three, Part 16 – Takanini Structure Plan Area 16.4 Special Purpose & Recreation zone (Bruce Pulman Park) 16.4.1 Objectives and Policies 16.4.2 Rules: General
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Manurewa Open Space Netw
    Manurewa Open Space Network Plan August 2018 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of the network plan ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Strategic context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Manurewa Local Board area ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Current State ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Treasure ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Enjoy ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Connect .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
    [Show full text]
  • Manurewa Te Rīpoata Ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020
    Te Poari ā-Rohe o Manurewa Te Rīpoata ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020 Volume 2.10 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Mihi He kōrero mō tēnei rīpoata Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e Let this vessel that carries my greetings travel About this report uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga by way of the Tāmaki River to the landing place o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. of Tainui canoe at Ōtāhuhu. This annual report tells the story of how Auckland Council has I reira ka tōia aku mihi ki te uru There, let my salutations be borne across the performed in delivering services in the Manurewa Local Board area ki te Pūkaki Tapu o Poutūkeka, isthmus to the Pūkaki lagoon, from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020. i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. there is the place, Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka o Hoturoa Paddling the Manukau Harbour You can read about our progress, expenditure, service CONTENTS performance and challenges faced in 2019/2020. ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. we follow the Āwhitu Peninsula to the headland. It’s part of the wider annual reporting package for Mihi ................................................................... 2 I konā, ka rere taku haere mā te ākau From there we fly down coast the Auckland Council Group and meets our Local Government Act 2002 obligations to report on our ki te pūaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, to the Waikato river mouth, About this report ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Annual Monitoring Report 2015
    Social Impact Monitoring Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora Annual Monitoring Report 2015 pg. 1 Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora. Social Impact Monitoring: Third Annual Report 2015. June 2016 The baseline, 2013 and 2014 reports were prepared by Dianne Buchan and Chris Cosslett of Corydon Consultants Ltd. This 2015 report is an update of those reports by Quigley and Watts Ltd, drawing on the 2015 data collected by Corydon Consultants Ltd and on the text and layout of the previous authors. Substantial additions include an analysis of data, chapter summaries and overall assessments. Consequently an Executive Summary is now presented. Finally, all reports have been undertaken in accordance with conditions of designation set by the Board of Inquiry for the construction of the Auckland South Corrections Facility (Kohuora) at Wiri. Cover design by Rev Mark Beale, Member of the Community Impact Forum Social Impact Monitoring 2015 Third Annual Report – ARWCF and ASCF Kohuora i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites Under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Re
    sustainability Article Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Relevance to the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand Károly Németh 1,2,3,* , Ilmars Gravis 3 and Boglárka Németh 1 1 School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary 3 The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa, 52 Hukutaia Road, Op¯ otiki¯ 3122, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-4791484 Abstract: Geoheritage is an important aspect in developing workable strategies for natural hazard resilience. This is reflected in the UNESCO IGCP Project (# 692. Geoheritage for Geohazard Resilience) that continues to successfully develop global awareness of the multifaced aspects of geoheritage research. Geohazards form a great variety of natural phenomena that should be properly identified, and their importance communicated to all levels of society. This is especially the case in urban areas such as Auckland. The largest socio-economic urban center in New Zealand, Auckland faces potential volcanic hazards as it sits on an active Quaternary monogenetic volcanic field. Individual volcanic geosites of young eruptive products are considered to form the foundation of community Citation: Németh, K.; Gravis, I.; outreach demonstrating causes and consequences of volcanism associated volcanism. However, in Németh, B. Dilemma of recent decades, rapid urban development has increased demand for raw materials and encroached Geoconservation of Monogenetic on natural sites which would be ideal for such outreach. The dramatic loss of volcanic geoheritage Volcanic Sites under Fast of Auckland is alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Wheeler, Panuku Development Auckland
    Our Story 1 Who we are Panuku Development Auckland opened its doors on 1 September 2015 as Auckland’s new urban regeneration agency, a council controlled organisation of Auckland Council. Panuku means to ‘move on and move forward’. 2 Our people 3 Where we came from Panuku Development Auckland is the result of Waterfront Auckland and Auckland Council Property Limited joining forces to bring together strengths in commercial property, redevelopment and place shaping. 4 Our vision Shaping spaces for Aucklanders to love 5 Our objectives Facilitate redevelopment of urban locations Accommodate growth Facilitate vibrant development Waterfront development Optimisation of council’s property portfolio Contribute to the management of non-service properties 6 What we do Catalyse urban development through: • development and regeneration • placemaking Strategically create value from assets through: • portfolio management • disposals • acquisitions. Our commitment is to create people-centred spaces for Auckland’s diverse fabric of different ethnicities, ideas and ways of living. We are focused on how we can set a positive, collaborative design led path for the future to ensure Aucklanders share a stake in the development of our land. 7 The Panuku property cycle 8 How we do it: shaping spaces for Aucklanders to love 9 Priority development locations 10 Transform New locations: Manukau Town Centre & surrounds Onehunga Town Centre & Wharf Existing locations: Wynyard Quarter Tamaki Regeneration (in partnership) Case study: Wynyard Quarter 12 Case study: Wynyard
    [Show full text]