DOCSLIB.ORG

Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA Auckland plan targets: monitoring report 2015 WITH DATA FOR THE SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 With Data for the Southern Initiative Area March 2016 Technical Report 2016/007 Auckland Council Technical Report 2016/007 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-9941350-0-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-9941350-1-8 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Submitted for review on 26 February 2016 Review completed on 18 March 2016 Reviewed by one reviewer. Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Lucy Baragwanath Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit Date: 18 March 2016 Recommended citation Wilson, R., Reid, A and Bishop, C (2016). Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with data for the Southern Initiative area. Auckland Council technical report, TR2016/007 Note This technical report updates and replaces Auckland Council technical report TR2015/030 Auckland Plan Targets: monitoring report 2015 which does not contain data for the Southern Initiative area. © 2016 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication and information and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Table of contents Introduction......................................................................................................... 4 Strategic Direction 1 – Create a strong, inclusive and equitable society that ensures opportunity for all Aucklanders ............................................................. 6 Strategic Direction 2 – Enable Māori aspirations through recognition of the Treaty of Waitangi and customary rights .......................................................... 21 Strategic Direction 3 – Integrate arts and culture into our everyday lives ......... 28 Strategic Direction 4 - Protect and conserve Auckland’s historic heritage for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations .......................... 33 Strategic Direction 5 – Promote individual and community well-being through participation and excellence in recreation and sport ......................................... 37 Strategic Direction 6 – Develop an economy that delivers opportunity and prosperity for all Aucklanders and New Zealand .............................................. 44 Strategic Direction 7 – Acknowledge that nature and people are inseparable . 50 Strategic Direction 8 – Contribute to tackling climate change and increasing energy resilience .............................................................................................. 65 Strategic Direction 9 – Keep rural Auckland productive, protected and environmentally sound ..................................................................................... 69 Strategic Direction 10 – Create a stunning City Centre with well-connected quality towns, villages and neighbourhoods ..................................................... 72 Strategic Direction 11 – House all Aucklanders in secure, healthy homes they can afford ......................................................................................................... 77 Strategic Direction 12 – Plan, deliver and maintain quality infrastructure to make Auckland liveable and resilient ............................................................... 86 Strategic Direction 13 – Create better connections and accessibility within Auckland, across New Zealand, and to the world ............................................. 94 The Southern Initiative ................................................................................... 100 Appendix: Changes to the Auckland Plan measures ...................................... 129 __________________________________________________________________________ Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with TSI data List of tables and figures Tables Table 1: Proportion of eligible 4 year olds who have received the B4 School Check ................... 8 Table 2: Number of enrolments in licensed early childhood learning services in Auckland ......... 9 Table 3: Percentage of school leavers with NCEA Level 2 or above, by ethnicity ..................... 11 Table 4: Percentage of school leavers with NCEA Level 2 or above, by school decile .............. 11 Table 5: Number of young adults (aged 15-24) with a post-secondary qualification .................. 12 Table 6: Proportion of respondents who felt ‘very safe’ or ‘safe’ (%) (2010, 2012 and 2014) .... 14 Table 7: Number of road deaths and serious injuries (DSI) by crash category, Auckland ......... 15 Table 8: Public Hospital Injury Discharges .................................................................................. 16 Table 9: Life expectancy by gender and ethnicity, Auckland (2005-07, 2012-14) ...................... 17 Table 10: Number of synthetic pitches in Auckland by year (2010-2014)................................... 41 Table 11: Proportion of threatened species and ecosystems under active management .......... 53 Table 12: Change in landcover (in ha) for different landcover classes, 2008-2012 .................... 62 Table 13: GHG emissions baseline, estimated contribution by type (%) (1990 and 2009) ........ 66 Table 14: Estimated resident population in the Auckland city centre (at 30 June, 2006-2013) .. 75 Table 15: Percentage of households that own the dwelling they live in, by local board ............. 79 Table 16: Proportion who owned or part-owned the dwelling they lived in, by ethnicity ............ 85 Table 17: Auckland region public transport mode share (7am – 9am) ....................................... 96 Table 18: Number of fatal and serious road injuries, Auckland and New Zealand (2006-2013) 97 Table 19: Number of licensed ECE services, by type (as at end June 2014 and 2015)........... 102 Table 20: Number and percentage of new entrants (year one),regularly participated in early childhood education .......................................................................................................... 103 Table 21: Number of enrolments in licensed ECE services in the Southern Initiative area by ethnicity (June 2009 to 2014) ........................................................................................... 104 Table 22: Average number of hours spent per week in early childhood education .................. 105 Table 23: Number and proportion of residents aged 15 and over with formal education qualifications, Southern Initiative and Auckland (2006 and 2013) ................................... 111 Table 24: Overall school attainment by school leavers, Southern Initiative ............................. 112 Table 25: School leaver attainment by ethnicity, Southern Initiative and Auckland .................. 114 Table 26: Number of school leavers who have attained NCEA level 1 or above ..................... 115 Table 27: Non-enrolment rates per 1000 students, by Territorial Local Authority ..................... 116 Table 28: Number of 18-year olds receiving a benefit in the Southern Initiative local boards, by benefit group ..................................................................................................................... 119 Table 29: Number, proportion of households in private dwellings with access to the internet . 122 Table 30: Proportion of population 15 year and over who live in a property they owned. ........ 123 Table 31: Smoking status of Southern Initiative area and Auckland residents ......................... 127 ____________________________________________________________________________ Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with TSI data 2 Figures Figure 1: Percentage of 2 year olds who have all immunisations ................................................. 7 Figure 2: Rate of reported offences per 10,000 population, by Police district ............................ 13 Figure 3: Rating of a sense of community in local neighbourhood ............................................. 20 Figure 4: Number of employees and geographic units within Auckland’s creative sector .......... 30 Figure 5: Annual guest nights in Auckland Regional Tourism Organisation ............................... 31 Figure 6: Percentage of Auckland population who spoke one, two, three or more languages ... 32 Figure 7: Residents’ satisfaction with the way that historic places are cared for ........................ 36 Figure 8: Weekly participation rates in sport and recreation .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule
    Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule [rcp/dp] Introduction The factors in B4.2.2(4) have been used to determine the features included in Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule, and will be used to assess proposed future additions to the schedule. ID Name Location Site type Description Unitary Plan criteria 2 Algies Beach Algies Bay E This site is one of the a, b, g melange best examples of an exposure of the contact between Northland Allocthon and Miocene Waitemata Group rocks. 3 Ambury Road Mangere F A complex 140m long a, b, c, lava cave Bridge lava cave with two d, g, i branches and many well- preserved flow features. Part of the cave contains unusual lava stalagmites with corresponding stalactites above. 4 Anawhata Waitākere A This locality includes a a, c, e, gorge and combination of g, i, l beach unmodified landforms, produced by the dynamic geomorphic processes of the Waitakere coast. Anawhata Beach is an exposed sandy beach, accumulated between dramatic rocky headlands. Inland from the beach, the Anawhata Stream has incised a deep gorge into the surrounding conglomerate rock. 5 Anawhata Waitākere E A well-exposed, and a, b, g, l intrusion unusual mushroom-shaped andesite intrusion in sea cliffs in a small embayment around rocks at the north side of Anawhata Beach. 6 Arataki Titirangi E The best and most easily a, c, l volcanic accessible exposure in breccia and the eastern Waitākere sandstone Ranges illustrating the interfingering nature of Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule the coarse volcanic breccias from the Waitākere Volcano with the volcanic-poor Waitematā Basin sandstone and siltstones.
    [Show full text]
  • Pukekawa — the Domain Volcano
    Pukekawa — the Domain Volcano New Zealand is a land of volcanoes The springs provided Auckland’s first leading the Ngapuhi from the North and earthquakes. Volcanic activity has piped water supply in 1866. The and Potatau Te Wherowhero leading played a major role in shaping New Domain Wintergarden’s fernery occu- the local Ngati Whatua. A sacred Zealand since its earliest origins, pies a disused scoria quarry on the Totara tree planted by Princess Te around 500 million years ago. north side of the small central scoria Puea Herangi to commemorate the Auckland City is built on an active field cone. battles and the eventual settlement of of small basalt volcanoes. Forty-eight the dispute stands on Pukekaroa sur- have erupted within 29km of the city Maori Use of Pukekawa rounded by a palisade. centre over the last 150 000 years. The The Domain has been altered signifi- Later Use of Auckland’s most recent eruption, 600 years ago, cantly by contact with humans. When Volcanoes formed Rangitoto Island at the en- Maori people arrived in Auckland they trance to Auckland Harbour. Because cleared the land for gardens, particu- Pukekawa was part of the land which of the intensity of past volcanic and larly choosing the fertile north-facing Ngati Whatua sold to the Europeans geologic activity within the Auckland who by 1860 had drained and filled region another eruption possible. slopes of the volcanic cones. Later their descendants looked to more per- the swamp and turned it into cricket Auckland Domain Volcano manent settlements, so that parts of fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Trail Notes Contents
    22 October 2020 Auckland trail notes Contents • Mangawhai to Pakiri • Mt Tamahunga (Te Hikoi O Te Kiri) Track • Govan Wilson to Puhoi Valley • Puhoi Track • Puhoi to Wenderholm by kayak • Puhoi to Wenderholm by walk • Wenderholm to Stillwater • Okura to Long Bay • North Shore Coastal Walk • Coast to Coast Walkway • Onehunga to Puhinui • Puhinui Stream Track • Totara Park to Mangatawhiri River • Hunua Ranges • Mangatawhiri to Mercer Mangawhai to Pakiri Route From Mangawhai Heads carpark, follow the road to the walkway by 44 Wintle Street which leads down to the estuary. Follow the estuary past a camping ground, a boat ramp & holiday baches until wooden steps lead up to the Findlay Street walkway. From Findlay Street, head left into Molesworth Drive until reaching Mangawhai Village. Then a right into Moir Street, left into Insley Street and across the estuary then left into Black Swamp Road. Follow this road until reaching Pacific Road which leads you through a forestry block to the beach and the next stage of Te Araroa. Bypass Note: You could obtain a boat ride across the estuary to the Mangawhai Spit to avoid the road walking section. Care of sand-nesting birds is required on this Scientific Wildlife Reserve - please stick to the shoreline. Just 1km south, a stream cuts across the beach and it can go over thigh height, as can other water crossings on this track. Follow the coast southwards for another 2km, then take the 1 track over Te Ārai Point. Once back on the beach, continue south for 12km (fording Poutawa Stream on the way) until you cross the Pākiri River then head inland to reach the end of Pākiri River Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Map Series 3
    HEPBURN CREEK KAWAU ISLAND ALGIES BAY BEEHIVE ISLAND CHALLENGER ISLAND MOTUKETEKETE ISLAND MOTUREKAREKA ISLAND PUKAPUKA MOTUTARA ISLAND MOTUORA ISLAND MAHURANGI WEST 1 TE HAUPA ISLAND WENDERHOLM WAIWERA MAHURANGI IS OREWA WOODED ISLAND TIRITIRI MATANGI ISLAND REGIONAL PARK SILVERDALE MATAKATIA BAY BIG MANLY ARKLES BAY STILLWATER WADE HEADS 21 LONG BAY OKURA MARINE RESERVE LONG BAY REGIONAL PARK MOTUHOROPAPA ISLAND THE NOISES TORBAY DAVID ROCKS OTATA ISLAND RAKINO IS. ZENO ROCK BROWNS BAY MARIA ISLAND ALBANY THE NOISES HORUHORU ROCK MURRAYS BAY 173(Gannet Rock) MAIRANGI BAY MOTUTAPU ISLAND MILFORD TARAHIKI IS TAKAPUNA RANGITOTO ISLAND ONEROA PALM BEACH (Shag Is) BEACH HAVEN BLACKPOOL 115 SURFDALE ONETANGI PAKATOA ISLAND 167 OSTENDWAIHEKE ISLAND 94 WAIHEKE ISLAND NORTHCOTE 168 FRENCHMANS CAP DOMAIN BAYSWATER MOTUIHE IS. 169 42 PAPAKOHATU IS 89OMIHA ROTOROA (Crusoe Is) 106 ISLAND 41 DEVONPORTHEAD 170 46 64 BROWNS IS. 172 (Motukorea) 44 HERNE BAY 66 KOHIMARAMA 172 ST HELIERS AUCKLAND ORAKEI PT. CHEVALIER DOMAIN GLENDOWIE TAHUNA BEACH WATERVIEW GLEN INNES PONUI ISLAND REMUERA 74 MOTUKARAKA IS (Chamberlins Is) PARKMARAETAI BEACHLANDS FARM COVE PANMURE HOWICK PANMURE BASIN BEACHLANDS PAKIHI ISLAND MT WELLINGTON DUDER PARK 126 PAKURANGA ONEHUNGA BLOCKHOUSE BAY 130 176 NIMT AMBURY REGIONAL PARK 174 OTAHUHU EAST TAMAKI WHITFORD 175 REGIONAL MANGERE SEWAGE PARK KAWAKAWA BAY PUKETUTU ISLAND MANGERE ORERE POINT ORERE TAPAPAKANGA REGIONAL PARK CLEVEDON PUHINUI MATINGARAHI WIROA IS. MANUREWA MANUKAU HARBOUR WEYMOUTH TAKANINI WAHARAU 177 WATTLE DOWNSCONIFER GROVE REGIONAL PARK PAPAKURA WHAREKAWA HUNUA RANGES REGIONAL PARK 178 ELLETS BEACH SEAGROVE 179 KARAKA 180 DRURY KAIAUA KINGSEAT CLARKS BEACH WAIAU PA GLENBROOK BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites Under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Re
    sustainability Article Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Relevance to the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand Károly Németh 1,2,3,* , Ilmars Gravis 3 and Boglárka Németh 1 1 School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary 3 The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa, 52 Hukutaia Road, Op¯ otiki¯ 3122, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-4791484 Abstract: Geoheritage is an important aspect in developing workable strategies for natural hazard resilience. This is reflected in the UNESCO IGCP Project (# 692. Geoheritage for Geohazard Resilience) that continues to successfully develop global awareness of the multifaced aspects of geoheritage research. Geohazards form a great variety of natural phenomena that should be properly identified, and their importance communicated to all levels of society. This is especially the case in urban areas such as Auckland. The largest socio-economic urban center in New Zealand, Auckland faces potential volcanic hazards as it sits on an active Quaternary monogenetic volcanic field. Individual volcanic geosites of young eruptive products are considered to form the foundation of community Citation: Németh, K.; Gravis, I.; outreach demonstrating causes and consequences of volcanism associated volcanism. However, in Németh, B. Dilemma of recent decades, rapid urban development has increased demand for raw materials and encroached Geoconservation of Monogenetic on natural sites which would be ideal for such outreach. The dramatic loss of volcanic geoheritage Volcanic Sites under Fast of Auckland is alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Value Assessment
    CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT BY TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA for DRURY PLAN CHANGES Copyright © 2019 Te Ākitai Waiohua - The information contained in this document is to remain confidential and is supplied only for the purposes of the specified project. It is not to be disclosed to any third party for purposes outside of the specified project without the express permission of Te Ākitai Waiohua. Table of Contents TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA STRUCTURE ..................................................................................... 3 PRINCIPLES OF THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................. 4 KAITIAKITANGA .................................................................................................................... 4 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT ........................................................................................ 6 PRINCIPLES OF THE TREATY OF WAITANGI .................................................................... 7 CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 8 PRINCIPLES OF CONSULTATION ....................................................................................... 8 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA GENEALOGY .................................................................................... 9 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA TIMELINE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 10 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA HISTORICAL SUMMARY ................................................................ 13 DRURY PLAN CHANGES...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 1 Appendix 3.1: Schedule Of
    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Appendix 3.1: Schedule of Outstanding Natural Features Introduction The following criteria are used to determine the contents of this schedule, and will be used to consider any proposed additions to it. a. the extent to which the landform feature or geological site contributes to the understanding of the geology or evolution of the biota in the region, New Zealand or the earth (includes type localities of rock formations, minerals and fossils) b. the rarity or unusual nature of the site or feature; c. the extent to which the feature or site is an outstanding representative example of the diversity of natural landforms and geological features in Auckland; d. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site is a component of a recognisable group of geologically associated features; e. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site contributes to the aesthetic value or visual legibility of the wider natural landscape; f. the community association with, or public appreciation of the values of the feature or site g. the potential value of the feature or site for public education; h. the potential value of the feature or site to provide additional understanding of the geological or biotic history of the region; i. the state of preservation of the feature or site; j. the extent to which a feature or site is associated with an historically important natural event, geologically related industry, or individual involved in earth science research k. the importance of the feature or site to Mana Whenua; l.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3A Schedule of Archaeological Features
    APPENDIX 3A SCHEDULE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES . CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 Page 1 reprinted 04/07/03 APPENDIX 3A CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 2 ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 reprinted 04/07/03 APPENDIX 3A SCHEDULE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES Note: A = Archaeological Feature H = Historic/Cultural Value A/G = Archaeological and Geological Feature S = Scientific/Educational Value V = Visual Amenity Value For an explanation of the criteria for scheduling and the rules refer Part 5C.7.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES NOTE: This schedule is not the same as the New Zealand Historic Places Trust Register for Auckland. It is a separate but parallel protection process. Since an archaeological feature may appear in either or both lists care should be taken to ascertain and fulfil any obligations deriving from the feature being included in either or both lists. THIS SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROTECTED ITEMS IN THE CENTRAL AREA OR HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS ADDRESS FEATURE PRINCIPAL FEATURE MAP CRITERIA FOR TYPE REFERENCE SCHEDULING Achilles Point to Karaka Bay cliffline Pa and associated Maori H, S, V A/G B15-06 Cliff Road, Waitara Road, Riddell Road habitation sites. Waitemata vicinity. series sandstone cliffs showing folded strata and Parnell Grit at Karaka Point. Also fallen blocks from the tuff ring of Glover Park. Crater containing pieces of greywacke, sandstone and schist brought up from depth Auckland Domain Pa and associated Maori H, S, V A/G C09-23 Stanley Street, Titoki Street, Carlton Gore habitation sites, early European Road, Park Road, Auckland Hospital, sites, explosion crater, scoria Grafton Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Volcanic Field Magmatism, Volcanism, and Hazard: a Review
    1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand 2 Journal of Geology and Geophysics on 18 March 2020, available online: 3 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102 4 5 6 Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review 7 8 9 Jenni L Hopkins*1, Elaine R Smid*2, Jennifer D Eccles2, Josh L Hayes3, Bruce W Hayward4, Lucy E McGee5, 10 Kasper van Wijk2, Thomas M Wilson3, Shane J Cronin2, Graham S Leonard6, Jan M Lindsay2, Karoly 11 Németh7, Ian E M Smith2 12 13 *Corresponding Author(s): [email protected] / [email protected] 14 15 1Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand 16 2 University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 17 3 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 18 4 Geomarine Research, 19 Debron Ave, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand 19 5 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 20 6 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 7 Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 22 23 24 25 26 27 Manuscript prepared for submission to the IAVCEI special issue of New Zealand Journal of Geology and 28 Geophysics 29 30 31 1 32 33 Keywords 34 intraplate, monogenetic volcanism, chronology, tephrochronology, volcanic hazard assessment, faulting, 35 magma ascent rates, geochemistry, eruption scenarios, New Zealand 2 36 Abstract 37 Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a basaltic intraplate volcanic field in North Island, New Zealand, 38 upon which >1.6 million people live.
    [Show full text]
  • Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014
    Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey Survey Report 2014 Cover image: Toetoe, Roscommon Road, Papatoetoe Auckland Council, 2014 Recommended citation: Auckland Council Heritage Unit (2014). Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey: Survey Report. Auckland Council. © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment
    Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment Document History and Status Revision Date Reviewed by Status 21.02.2019 R Pryor Draft 27.02.019 For Issue File Number/Name 18740 LVA01 Author J Hogan Client Euroclass Services Ltd 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 LA4 Landscape Architects have been engaged by Euroclass Services Ltd to undertake a landscape assessment of Outstanding Natural Feature 93 (ONF 93) to inform a Private Plan Change request to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) (AUPOP). As part of the plan change, Euroclass Services Ltd seeks to: § rezone the existing quarry zoning associated with the Stonehill Business Park under the AUPOP to Business - Heavy Industry § remove the ONF classification from the southern part of the plan change area that generally corresponds to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road (refer to Figure 1), as this is considered to be erroneous. Figure 1. The Site and Plan Change Area In Relation to ONF93 Source: Babbage 1.2 The scope of this assessment includes: § a description of the site and setting § a review of the landscape assessment of ONF 93 undertaken as part of Landscape Evaluations of Geological Sites and Landforms of Auckland and the Identification of Outstanding Natural Features, which was prepared in 2012 and used to inform AUPOP § an assessment of the landscape values of the portion of the PC area currently located within ONF 93 27.02.2019 2 LA4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS § conclusions as to the applicability of the ONF classifications locally and in particular to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road. 1.3 I am very familiar with the site and surrounds having previously prepared a landscape and visual assessment as part of the consenting stage for the nearby Auckland South Corrections Facility, as well as being the lead landscape architect involved in the landscape design and supervision of landscape works associated with the prison.
    [Show full text]