DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Proposed Draft Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Proposed Men’s Correctional Facility At Wiri Draft report and decision produced under section 149Q of the Resource Management Act Volume 1 of 2 Published by the Board of Inquiry into The Proposed Men’s Correctional Facility at Wiri Publication number: EPA 0010 ISBN 978-0-478-34856-9 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-34857-6 (electronic ISBN 978-0-478-34858-3 (CD) BOARD OF INQUIRY PROPOSED MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AT WIRI In the Matter of The Resource Management Act And In the Matter of a referral to a Board of Inquiry under s149J of the Act of an application by the Minister of Corrections to alter Designation 288 THE BOARD OF INQUIRY Judge M Harland (Chair) Deputy Chief Judge C Fox D Hill L Auton W Burrill Prepared in July 2011 Appearances: MR S QUINN and MS K ANDERSON Counsel for Department of Corrections MR R ENRIGHT and MS H O’CONNELL Counsel for Wiri Oil Services Limited and Te Kawerau Iwi Tribal Authority Inc MR G LANNING and MR W BANGMA Counsel for Auckland Transport MR P O’DRISCOLL Counsel for Te Akitai Waiohua MS M DICKEY and MR M ALLAN Counsel for Auckland Council and the Manurewa Local Board MS S SIMONS, Ms J VAN DEN BURGEN AND SISTER M MARTIN Counsel for Vision Manukau MS J CAMPBELL Counsel for Investment Property Holdings Limited Partnership MS P FORDYCE Counsel appointed by the Board as Friend of Submitters MR J MAASSEN Counsel appointed to assist the Board of Inquiry MR R GUNSTON AND MR R BROOKING as representatives of Prison Fellowship New Zealand MR G SMITH as representative of Auckland Volcanic Cones Society Inc SISTER A HURLEY as representative of Sisters of Mercy Wiri MR A JOHNSON as representative of the Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit of The Salvation Army MR K FLAVELL as representative of Ngati Te Ata MS A WILLIAMS as representative of Wiri Business Improvement District MS S JOHNSTON as representative of Manurewa Principals Association MS A SEARLE AND MS AROHA GRAY as representatives of Child Advocacy Group MR F BUCK as representative of Weymouth Residents and Ratepayers Association MS C BROWN MR G AND MRS R CLARK MR D FRASER MS P GRAY MR T GREENING MS T LUXTON MR I DUNWOODIE MR R FOWLER MS D JELICICH MS A SCHAAF MS L WALL MR N ROGERS Hearing: Held at TelstraClear Pacific events centre, 770 Great South Road, Manukau Monday 2 May 2011 Thursday – Friday, 5 -6 May 2011 Monday 9 May 2011 to Friday 13 May 2011 Monday 16 May 2011 to Friday 20 May 2011 Tuesday 24 May 2011 to Thursday 26 May 2011 Wednesday 22 June 2011 Site Visits: 20 January 2011 - Pre-hearing site visit to Spring Hill Corrections Facility, the wider Clendon community and the proposed site of the Men’s Prison at Wiri Proposal 3 May 2011 –Wiri Oil Services Limited (WOSL) terminal, Auckland Region Women’s Correction Facility and views of the proposed sites from McLaughins Road 12 May 2011 – Various residential and other locations in the wider Manukau area, potentially affected by the proposal. 23 May 2011 – Mt Eden Corrections Facility, Korowai Maanaki youth Justice Facility, view of the proposed site from upper floors/roof of Auckland Council’s Manukau Service Centre building at Wiri Station Road. DRAFT REPORT AND DECISION OF THE BOARD OF INQUIRY The application to alter Designation 288 is confirmed subject to the terms and conditions contained in Volume 2 of this draft Report and Decision. Volume 1 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 17 2.1 Section 181 of the RMA 17 2.2 Part 6AA RMA 17 2.3 Applicable burden and standard of proof 19 2.4 Conditions 20 3 THE PRINCIPAL ISSUES IN CONTENTION 20 4 THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 22 4.2 The existing designation 25 4.3 The women’s prison 26 4.4 Korowai Manaaki youth justice facility 28 4.5 The demographic profile of the immediately and wider impacted communities 30 4.5.1 Population 30 4.5.2 Age 31 4.5.3 Ethnicity 31 4.5.4 Community cohesion 32 4.5.5 Deprivation indices 33 5 THE PROPOSAL 35 5.1 Overview of Prison Services 35 5.2 The NoR and the objectives of the Minister of Corrections 37 5.3 Public-Private-Partnership Model (PPP) 41 5.4 Site layout and design 45 6 PLANNING DOCUMENTS 47 6.1 Overview of the planners’ evidence 48 6.2 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 50 6.3 Auckland Regional Policy Statement (“ARPS”) 51 6.4 Auckland Regional Policy Statement – Proposed Plan Change 6 51 6.5 Operative Manukau District Plan (“the District Plan”) 51 7 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES. 52 7.1 The issues and the evidence 52 7.2 Legal framework 53 7.2.1 When are alternatives required to be considered? 53 7.2.2 Adequacy of consideration of alternatives 55 7.3 The evidence 57 7.3.1 Corrections’ case 57 7.3.1.1 The first business case 58 7.3.1.2 The second business case 59 7 7.3.2 Submitters’ cases 61 7.3.2.1 Mr Greening 61 7.3.2.2 The Council/Local Board 61 7.3.2.3 Vision Manukau 62 7.3.2.4 The Prison Fellowship 62 7.4 Findings 63 8 IS THE ALTERATION REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE MINISTER’S OBJECTIVES? 64 8.1 The issues and the evidence 64 8.2 The Minister’s objectives 65 8.3 National capacity shortfall 65 8.4 Reduction in reoffending rates 70 8.5 Optimising prisoner capacity and maintaining public safety 75 8.6 PPP objectives 75 8.7 Conclusion 78 9 ECONOMIC EFFECTS 78 9.1 The issues and the evidence 78 9.2 Assessed benefits of the proposed men’s prison 79 9.3 Methodology – EIA – v - CBA 80 9.4 Local – v – regional economic benefits 82 9.5 Findings 83 10 METHODOLOGY 83 11 CONSULTATION 85 11.1 The issues and the evidence 85 11.2 Legal provisions 86 11.3 The consultation process 88 11.3.1 Consultation methodology 89 11.3.2 What was done to consult 89 11.3.3 Review of reports 92 11.4 Was the consultation undertaken adequate? 93 11.4.1 General complaint 93 11.4.2 Specific omissions 94 11.4.2.1 Māori Community 94 11.4.2.2 Pacific Island community 95 11.4.2.3 Youth and children 95 11.4.2.4 Other impacted communities 96 11.5 Findings 96 12 SOCIAL EFFECTS 97 12.1 The issues and the evidence 97 12.2 The social impact assessment evidence 97 12.2.1 Background 97 12.2.2 Criticism of the SIA methodology 100 8 12.2.3 Response by Corrections 100 12.2.4 Findings on adequacy of SIA 102 12.3 Defining the impacted communities 103 12.4 Defining what comprises a social effect 105 12.5 Social effects which can be anticipated from a prison 105 12.5.1 Research 105 12.5.2 Social effects identified during AEE consultation 108 12.5.3 The Focus Groups 109 12.5.3.1 Youth 110 12.5.3.2 Māori 110 12.5.3.3 Pacific peoples 111 12.5.3.4 Local businesses 111 12.5.3.5 Social service providers 112 12.5.4 Submitters 112 12.6 Evaluation of the evidence of social effects by experts 113 12.6.1 Economic and employment benefits 113 12.6.2 Other benefits 115 12.6.3 Assessment of effects concerning community services 117 12.6.4 Relocation of staff and prisoners’ families/associates 121 12.6.5 Personal safety, security and crime 124 12.6.6 Assessment of effects regarding community image, stigma and well-being 127 12.6.7 Findings of effects on behaviours and attitudes of youth 128 12.6.8 Effects on women prisoners and staff 129 12.6.9 Cumulative effects 130 12.7 Findings 132 13 FIRE AND EXPLOSION RISK EFFECTS (WOSL) 137 13.1 Overview 137 13.2 Legal and planning framework 138 13.2.1 Jurisdiction to impose additional conditions on the women’s prison 138 13.2.2 Section 3 RMA - effects 139 13.2.3 HIPAP 4 140 13.2.4 Relevant plan provisions 143 13.3 The issues and the evidence 144 13.3.1 The Liquigas LPG terminal 144 13.3.2 Individual and societal risk/ALARP 145 13.3.3 Separation distance 147 13.3.4 Women’s prison capacity 147 13.3.4 Mitigation measures 149 13.4 Evaluation and findings 151 13.4.1 Exposure risk and Corrections’ responsibility 151 13.4.2 Timing of effective further risk reduction 152 14 EFFECTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC HERITAGE VALUES 155 9 14.1 Legal and planning framework 155 14.2 The evidence 156 14.2.1 Archaeological landscape 156 14.2.2 The site for proposed men’s prison 157 14.3 Findings 158 15 MĀORI CULTURE AND TRADITIONS 159 15.1 The issues and the evidence 160 15.2 Cultural landscape 161 15.3 Legal and planning framework 163 15.3.1 Tangata whenua issues 163 15.3.2 Planning instruments 165 15.4 The evidence 167 15.4.1 Correction’s evidence 167 15.4.1.1 Methodology 167 15.4.1.2 Consultation 168 15.4.2 Recorded iwi/hapu positions on the proposal prior to notification169 15.4.2.1 Ngati Te Ata 169 15.4.2.2 Te Akitai Waiohua 170 15.4.2.3 Issues common to both iwi/hapu 170 15.5 Mitigation proposed 171 15.5.1 Corrections’ proposals 171 15.5.2 Tangata whenua positions and proposed mitigation 172 15.5.2.1 Ngati Te Ata 173 15.5.2.2 Te Akitai Waiohua 175 15.6 Evaluation of cultural effects 178 15.6.1 Ngati Te Ata and Te Akitai Waiohua 178 15.6.2 Te Kawerau a Maki 179 15.7 Other Māori issues and effects 183 15.8 Findings 183 16 LANDSCAPE, BUILDING PLATFORM AND DESIGN, AND VISUAL EFFECTS 184 16.1 The issues and the evidence 184 16.2 The landscape value of Maunga Matukutureia 184 16.2.1 Dr Hayward’s evidence 187 16.2.2 Mr Goodwin’s evidence 191 16.2.3 Ms Gilbert’s evidence 192 16.2.4 Significance to Māori 192 16.2.5 Evaluation 192 16.3 Building platform and design 193 16.3.1 The issues and evidence 194 16.3.2 The IDMS 195 16.3.3 Development controls 197 16.3.4 Evaluation of building platform and design 198 16.5 Evaluation of landscape and visual effects 201 16.5.1 Visual simulations 201 10 16.5.2 Mitigation planting 202 16.5.2.1 The women’s prison conditions 202 16.5.2.2 The proposed conditions 203 16.6 Overall finding 203 17 OTHER EFFECTS 204 17.1 Ecological and stormwater effects 204 17.1.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COMPASS Research Centre Barry Milne and Nichola Shackleton
    New New Zealand Data Quality of the 2018 New Zealand Census Barry Milne COMPASS Seminar Tuesday, 3 March 2020 The University of Auckland The University of Outline Background to the Census What happened with Census 2018? Why did it happen? What fixes were undertaken? What are the data quality implications? New New Zealand 1. Population counts 2. Electoral implications 3. Use of alternative data sources 4. Poor/very poor quality variables Guidelines for users of the Census The University of Auckland The University of Some recommendations that (I think) should be taken on board 2 Background New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings Official count of how many people and dwellings there are in the country at a set point in time (by age, sex, ethnicity, region, community) Detailed social, cultural and socio-economic information about the total New Zealand population and key groups in the population Undertaken since 1851, and every five years since 1881, with exceptions New New Zealand • No census during the Great Depression (1931) • No census during the Second World War (1941) • The 1946 Census was brought forward to September 1945 • The Christchurch earthquakes caused the 2011 Census to be re-run in 2013 Since 1966, held on first Tuesday in March of Census year The most recent census was undertaken on March 6, 2018 The University of Auckland The University of http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/info-about-the-census/intro-to-nz-census/history/history-summary.aspx 3 Background Census is important for Electorates and electoral boundaries Central and local government policy making and monitoring Allocating resources from central government to local areas Academic and market research Statistical benchmarks New New Zealand A data frame to select samples for social surveys Many other things beside… “every dollar invested in the census generates a net benefit of five dollars in the economy” (Bakker, 2014, Valuing the census, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmark Survey of the New Zealand Public's Knowledge And
    Benchmark survey of the New Zealand public’s knowledge and understanding of the First World War and its attitudes to centenary commemorations Report prepared for: First World War Centenary Programme Office Contact person: Colmar Brunton Date: 4 March 2013 Table of Contents Executive summary..........................................................................................................................................3 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................................6 Background and objectives..............................................................................................................................8 Research methodology ....................................................................................................................................9 Survey results ................................................................................................................................................11 Interest in history and engagement in learning about history.........................................................................11 History ..........................................................................................................................................................11 Local community history ..............................................................................................................................13 Genealogy.....................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach
    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R BAY RD R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O D Island Haven I R R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WA Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W A R R K ONEWA L HaurakiMotorway .
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Manurewa Open Space Netw
    Manurewa Open Space Network Plan August 2018 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of the network plan ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Strategic context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Manurewa Local Board area ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Current State ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Treasure ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Enjoy ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Connect .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
    [Show full text]
  • Manurewa Te Rīpoata Ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020
    Te Poari ā-Rohe o Manurewa Te Rīpoata ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020 Volume 2.10 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Mihi He kōrero mō tēnei rīpoata Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e Let this vessel that carries my greetings travel About this report uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga by way of the Tāmaki River to the landing place o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. of Tainui canoe at Ōtāhuhu. This annual report tells the story of how Auckland Council has I reira ka tōia aku mihi ki te uru There, let my salutations be borne across the performed in delivering services in the Manurewa Local Board area ki te Pūkaki Tapu o Poutūkeka, isthmus to the Pūkaki lagoon, from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020. i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. there is the place, Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka o Hoturoa Paddling the Manukau Harbour You can read about our progress, expenditure, service CONTENTS performance and challenges faced in 2019/2020. ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. we follow the Āwhitu Peninsula to the headland. It’s part of the wider annual reporting package for Mihi ................................................................... 2 I konā, ka rere taku haere mā te ākau From there we fly down coast the Auckland Council Group and meets our Local Government Act 2002 obligations to report on our ki te pūaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, to the Waikato river mouth, About this report ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Routes Manurewa Fare Zones & Boundaries Routes
    Manurewa Routes Fare Zones 33 Papakura, Great South Rd, Manurewa, Manukau, Southern Bus Timetable Otahuhu Town Centre, Otahuhu Station & Boundaries 361 Manurewa, Clendon Park, Homai, Manukau, Tui Rd, Otara MIT North Campus Wellsford 362 Weymouth, Manurewa, Great South Rd, Manukau Station Omaha 363 Manurewa, Wattle Downs Matakana 365 Manukau Station, Homai, Manurewa, Randwick Park, Warkworth Takanini Station, Porchester Rd, Papakura Station 366 Manurewa, The Gardens, Everglade Dr, Manukau Station Warkworth Waiwera Helensville Hibiscus Coast Your guide to buses in this area Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Orewa Wainui Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour Timetable Routes Waitoki Mangere, Otahuhu, 31, 32, 309, 309X, 313, 321, 324, Upper North Shore Papatoetoe 25, 326, 380 Otara, Papatoetoe, Albany 31, 33, 314, 325, 351, 352, 353, 361 Waiheke Highbrook, East Tamaki Constellation Lower North Shore Riverhead Hauraki Gulf Takapuna Rangitoto Papakura 33, 365, 371, 372, 373, 376, 377, 378 Island 33 Huapai Westgate City Pukekohe, Waiuku Isthmus 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 398, 399 Waitemata Harbour Britomart Swanson Airporter 380 Kingsland Newmarket Beachlands Henderson Southern Line Train timetable Waitakere Panmure Eastern Line New Lynn Waitakere Onehunga 361 362 363 Ranges Otahuhu Botany Manukau Manukau Airport Manukau Harbour North Manukau South 365 366 Papakura Franklin Pukekohe Port Waikato Waiuku Tuakau Warkworth Huapai Manukau North Hibiscus Coast Waitakere Manukau South Upper North Shore City Franklin
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions
    Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions Contents Albert Eden ............................................................................................................................. 2 Devonport-Takapuna .............................................................................................................. 5 Franklin ................................................................................................................................... 7 Great Barrier ......................................................................................................................... 13 Henderson-Massey ............................................................................................................... 17 Hibiscus and Bays ................................................................................................................ 21 Howick .................................................................................................................................. 28 Kaipatiki ................................................................................................................................ 31 Mangere-Otahuhu ................................................................................................................. 38 Manurewa ............................................................................................................................. 42 Maungakiekie-Tamaki ........................................................................................................... 49 Orakei ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Progress Results
    Progress Result Issue: Mayor (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank AUSTIN, Aileen Independent 101 1552 BANKS, John Independent 102 161167 BARR, Marlene Independent 103 692 BRIGHT, Penny 104 2529 BROWN, Len Independent 105 2213651 CHAPMAN, Hugh Independent 106 1878 CRAIG, Colin Independent 107 40483 DAVE, Nga Independent 108 840 FONG, Harry Independent 109 1434 GILLIES, Shannon 110 467 KAHUI, Vinnie 111 1120 MCCULLOCH, Alan Independent 112 1520 MCDONALD, Steve Independent 113 643 NEESON, Vanessa Independent 115 2885 O'CONNOR, Phil Christians Against Abortion 116 1209 PRAST, Simon Independent 117 3578 PRESLAND, Raymond 118 278 ROSS, Mark Independent 119 3076 VERMUNT, Annalucia Communist League 120 427 WILLIAMS, Andrew Independent Progressive Leadership 121 3813 WILLMOTT, David Roads First 122 519 YOUNG, Wayne 123 553 INFORMAL 124 1261 BLANK 125 3752 Progress Result Issue: Rodney Ward (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank ASHTON, Tom Independent 201 3941 PEREIRA, Vincent Independent 202 444 ROSE, Christine 203 5553 WEBSTER, Penny Independent 204 8063 1 INFORMAL 205 21 BLANK 206 701 Progress Result Issue: Albany Ward (2) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank BALOUCH, Uzra Independent 221 736 BELL, Rodney Independent 222 3151 BRADLEY, Ian Independent 223 5273 CONDER, Laurie Independent 224 1419 COOPER, David Independent 225 2821 COOPER,
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Annual Monitoring Report 2015
    Social Impact Monitoring Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora Annual Monitoring Report 2015 pg. 1 Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora. Social Impact Monitoring: Third Annual Report 2015. June 2016 The baseline, 2013 and 2014 reports were prepared by Dianne Buchan and Chris Cosslett of Corydon Consultants Ltd. This 2015 report is an update of those reports by Quigley and Watts Ltd, drawing on the 2015 data collected by Corydon Consultants Ltd and on the text and layout of the previous authors. Substantial additions include an analysis of data, chapter summaries and overall assessments. Consequently an Executive Summary is now presented. Finally, all reports have been undertaken in accordance with conditions of designation set by the Board of Inquiry for the construction of the Auckland South Corrections Facility (Kohuora) at Wiri. Cover design by Rev Mark Beale, Member of the Community Impact Forum Social Impact Monitoring 2015 Third Annual Report – ARWCF and ASCF Kohuora i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014
    Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey Survey Report 2014 Cover image: Toetoe, Roscommon Road, Papatoetoe Auckland Council, 2014 Recommended citation: Auckland Council Heritage Unit (2014). Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey: Survey Report. Auckland Council. © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Manurewa Local Board Meeting Held on 5/12/2019
    Work Programme 2019/2020 Q1 Report ID Activity Name Activity Description Lead Dept / Budget Budget Activity RAG Q1 Commentary Unit or CCO Source Status Arts, Community and Events 110 Manurewa Lifelong Enable Manurewa's growing number of residents aged 55 years and over CS: ACE: LDI: Opex $65,000 In progress Green The Manurewa Seniors Network meetings are on hold as the meetings have been Learning and Seniors to engage in community activities and access the Life Long Learning Community service provider-led rather than community-led by seniors, and have not been well Network Scholarship to apply for funds for lifelong learning opportunities. Empowerment attended. Strengthen the capacity and partnerships of the Manurewa Seniors Haumaru Housing was unable to meet all its deliverables and have returned their Network to deliver Manurewa Seniors Network Expo and Life Long unspent funding. Staff are engaging a local contractor to identify existing local Learning Fund for seniors in Manurewa. ($15k) seniors networks and groups, and isolated seniors in the local board area, to establish their needs, strengths and aspirations. Results of the project will be Fund Manurewa Business Association to deliver Shuttle Loop Service. available in Q2. ($50k) 111 Manurewa Youth Fund the Youth Council to be involved in building the capacity of young CS: ACE: LDI: Opex $72,000 In progress Green The Manurewa Rangatahi scholarship round will be open for interested applicants Council and Rangatahi people to shape plans, neighbourhood facilities, and encourage and Community by the end of Q1. The 2019/2020 application and criteria have been updated and Scholarships support youth-led activities, linking into placemaking activity in Manurewa.
    [Show full text]