DOCSLIB.ORG

4.2 Ports of Auckland – the Base Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.2 Ports of Auckland – the Base Case Disclaimer- This report was prepared for Sapere Research Group, to inform their work on the Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy. It does not represent the views of the Ministry of Transport. Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy Infrastructure Gary Blick and David Moore 30 June 2020 Contents Glossary of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Purpose and scope............................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Purpose of this report ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Scope of this report .................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Steps in the analysis ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Period of analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Building on prior studies .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 The base case ................................................................................................................................................ 9 2.5 Options and sites ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.6 Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................................... 10 3. Outlook for freight growth and vessel size ............................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Forecasting growth in container freight ........................................................................................... 11 3.2 Sizing the future freight task ................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 The container forecast is the most critical ....................................................................................... 14 3.4 Outlook for larger container vessels .................................................................................................. 15 3.5 Implications for POAL .............................................................................................................................. 15 4. Port infrastructure requirements ................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Approach ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Ports of Auckland – the base case ...................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Northport option ....................................................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Port of Tauranga option ......................................................................................................................... 25 4.5 Northport and Port of Tauranga option ........................................................................................... 30 4.6 Firth of Thames option ............................................................................................................................ 33 4.7 Manukau Harbour option ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.8 Summary of port infrastructure costs ................................................................................................ 38 5. Rail infrastructure requirements ................................................................................................................................. 39 5.1 Method .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Base case ....................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.3 Northport option ....................................................................................................................................... 41 5.4 Port of Tauranga option ......................................................................................................................... 43 5.5 Firth of Thames option ............................................................................................................................ 44 5.6 Manukau Harbour option ...................................................................................................................... 45 5.7 Summary of rail infrastructure costs .................................................................................................. 46 6. Road infrastructure requirements .............................................................................................................................. 47 1 © 2020 Sapere Research Group 6.1 Method .......................................................................................................................................................... 47 6.2 Traffic modelling under redevelopment scenarios ...................................................................... 48 6.3 Road infrastructure required for existing ports ............................................................................. 50 6.4 Road connections required for new ports ....................................................................................... 52 6.5 Summary of road infrastructure costs ............................................................................................... 53 7. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................................................... 54 Appendix A: Port capacity plots ..................................................................................................................................... 56 Tables Table 1 Technical inputs from expert contributors ....................................................................................................... 10 Table 2 Container freight forecasts for Ports of Auckland – compounding annual growth rates ............. 12 Table 3 Container freight forecasts for Ports of Auckland – size of future freight task ................................. 13 Table 4 Bulk freight forecasts for Ports of Auckland – size of future freight task ............................................ 13 Table 5 Vehicle import forecasts for Ports of Auckland – size of future freight task ...................................... 13 Table 6 Cost estimates of port infrastructure requirements ..................................................................................... 38 Table 7 Cost estimates of rail infrastructure for Northport ....................................................................................... 42 Table 8 Cost estimates of rail infrastructure for Port of Tauranga ......................................................................... 43 Table 9 Cost estimates of rail infrastructure for Firth of Thames ............................................................................ 44 Table 10 Cost estimates of rail infrastructure for Manukau Harbour .................................................................... 45 Table 11 Cost estimates of rail infrastructure requirements ..................................................................................... 46 Table 12 Number of trucks per day forecast in 2053................................................................................................... 47 Table 13 Waterfront redevelopment land use assumptions ..................................................................................... 48 Table 14 Average Travel Speeds in the Auckland CBD, 2036 (km per hour) ...................................................... 49 Table 15 Cost estimates for road infrastructure for the Northport option ......................................................... 50 Table 16 Cost estimates for road infrastructure for the Port of Tauranga option ........................................... 51 Table 17 Cost estimates for road connections to new ports .................................................................................... 52 Table 18 Cost estimates of road infrastructure requirements .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Auckland District Plan
    E E See Appendix 6 Diagram 12 !1!82A 307 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 182 ! ! !R I M ! ! U ! ! ! R ! ! O ! ! A ! D ! M O A ! ! N H ! U ! ! R ! ! N ! ! ! A ! ! ! ! G ! ! M ! ! ! A ! ! P ! ! ! ! D ! ! R 182 ! ! 2 I ! S V ! ! ! O E ! ! U ! O ! ! ! 6 T ! F ! H ! ! ! F ! - ! ! W ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! E A ! M ! ! S ! ! ! ! 12 T P ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! R ! ! 14A ! N ! ! ! ! Mangere Inlet M ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! ! ! Ngarango Otainui ! ! T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! R ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A ! ! Island ! ! Y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 182A ! ! ! ! D ! A ! ! RO ! ! ! ! U M IM ! ! ! ! R A ! ! H ! ! ! ! ! U ! ! ! ! ! N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! G ! ! 182A ! ! A ! ! ! ! ! ! D ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! I ! ! 22 V ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! ! 26 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! u ! ! t ! h ! 21 ! 32 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! AD ! RO ! ! ! O 31 MIR ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! 42 ! ! ! ! ! 307 ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! 12 ! ! ! ! 46 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 17C ! NUE ! VE ! ! A ! 17B A 31 ON ! M ! ! 16 ! ! 182 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 17 ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! 17A 12 ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! " c ! ! !! ! e ! ! 280 !! s ! ! ! t 11 3A ! ! ! e ! 1 ! ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 81 2 ! ! ! ! ! 77 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 71 56 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " c ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 62A ! ! ! 62 ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! 66 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 51 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E U ! ! ! ! N 11 VE ! ! E A ! I ! ! ! ST ! 41 ! ! HA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! 56 !
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Manukau / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study: Hydrodynamic, Wave and Sediment-Transport Model Implementation and Calibration December TR 2008/056
    Southeastern Manukau / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study: Hydrodynamic, Wave and Sediment-Transport Model Implementation and Calibration December TR 2008/056 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No.056 December 2008 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-04-0 Technical Report. First Edition. Reviewed by: Approved for ARC Publication by: Name: Judy-Ann Ansen Name: Matthew Davis Position: Acting Team Leader Position: Group Manager Stormwater Action Team Partnerships & Community Programmes Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Date: 28 October 2010 Date: 28 October 2010 Recommended Citation: Pritchard, M; Gorman, R; Lewis, M. (2008). Southeastern Manukau Harbour / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study. Hydrodynamic Wave and Sediment Transport Model Implementation and Calibration. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report 2008/056. © 2008 Auckland Regional Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Regional Council's (ARC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Port of Auckland-NZIER FINAL.Pdf
    Location, location, location The value of having a port in the neighbourhood NZIER report to Ports of Auckland Limited October 2019 About NZIER NZIER is a specialist consulting firm that uses applied economic research and analysis to provide a wide range of strategic advice. We undertake and make freely available economic research aimed at promoting a better understanding of New Zealand’s important economic challenges. Our long-established Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion (QSBO) and Quarterly Predictions are available to members of NZIER. We pride ourselves on our reputation for independence and delivering quality analysis in the right form and at the right time. We ensure quality through teamwork on individual projects, critical review at internal seminars, and by peer review. NZIER was established in 1958. Authorship This paper was prepared at NZIER by Milad Maralani and Peter Wilson. It was quality approved by Laurie Kubiak. The assistance of Ports of Auckland Limited, Sarah Spring and Jessica Matthewson is gratefully acknowledged. Registered office: Level 13, Willeston House, 22–28 Willeston St | PO Box 3479, Wellington 6140 Auckland office: Ground Floor, 70 Shortland St, Auckland Tel +64 4 472 1880 | [email protected] | www.nzier.org.nz © NZ Institute of Economic Research (Inc). Cover image © www.dreamstime.com NZIER’s standard terms of engagement for contract research can be found at www.nzier.org.nz. While NZIER will use all reasonable endeavours in undertaking contract research and producing reports to ensure the information is as accurate as practicable, the Institute, its contributors, employees, and Board shall not be liable (whether in contract, tort (including negligence), equity or on any other basis) for any loss or damage sustained by any person relying on such work whatever the cause of such loss or damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ports of Auckland Annual Review 2012/13 the Port for Auckland’S Future
    Ports of Auckland Annual Review 2012/13 The port for Auckland’s future. 02 Ports of Auckland 2012/13 Annual Review Ports of Auckland has served New Zealand’s largest city since 1840. Handling over $23bn of trade, Ports of Auckland is your gateway to the world. Contents 03 Joint Chairman and CEO’s Report 26 Our People and Culture 08 Key Operational Highlights 34 Our Community 18 Financial Review 37 Our Environment 23 Key Projects 03 Ports of Auckland 2012/13 ’s Annual Review EO tatement Joint Chairman and C S “ 2012/13 has been a pivotal time for us.” RICHARD PEARSON CHAIRMAN 04 Ports of Auckland 2012/13 ’s Annual Review EO tatement Joint Chairman and C S Joint Chairman and CEO’s Report We are pleased to report that Ports of Over two years ago, we started to change Auckland has finished this financial year the way our business was structured to make in much better shape than it started. The it more customer focused, and that new year has been challenging, as we rebuilt organisational structure is now in place. It after an industrial dispute that resulted in has been an extended process of change but lost business and lower revenue. We have we now have an organisation which is more been in facilitation since May 2012 and, after streamlined and fluid in its structure in the sense nine months of talks, the facilitator made that people work and engage across multiple his recommendations in January 2013. We areas of the business. accepted the package of recommendations We are also investing in technology which will but, with the Maritime Union yet to accept enable us to deliver better customer service them, a new collective agreement has not and greater returns to our owners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland
    New Zealand Population Review, 35:55-74. Copyright © 2009 Population Association of New Zealand The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland WARDLOW FRIESEN * Abstract The inner city of Auckland, comprising the inner suburbs and the Central Business District (CBD) has undergone a process of reurbanisation in recent years. Following suburbanisation, redevelopment and motorway construction after World War II, the population of the inner city declined significantly. From the 1970s onwards some inner city suburbs started to become gentrified and while this did not result in much population increase, it did change the characteristics of inner city populations. However, global and local forces converged in the 1990s to trigger a rapid repopulation of the CBD through the development of apartments, resulting in a great increase in population numbers and in new populations of local and international students as well as central city workers and others. he transformation of Central Auckland since the mid-twentieth century has taken a number of forms. The suburbs encircling the TCentral Business District (CBD) have seen overall population decline resulting from suburbanisation, as well as changing demographic and ethnic characteristics resulting from a range of factors, and some areas have been transformed into desirable, even elite, neighbourhoods. Towards the end of the twentieth century and into the twenty first century, a related but distinctive transformation has taken place in the CBD, with the rapid construction of commercial and residential buildings and a residential population growth rate of 1000 percent over a fifteen year period. While there are a number of local government and real estate reports on this phenomenon, there has been relatively little academic attention to its nature * School of Environment, The University of Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnect November 2015
    Interconnect November 2015 In this Issue Port Automation POAL’s Very Independent Point of Difference Our Great New Tools Interconnect November 2015 CONTENTS 2 POAL Focus POAL Focus 4 Operations Review space to hear about more links in Heart Transplant Automation our supply chain. It’s an exciting State of New Berth Built for Three development that enables us, in conjunction with our hub operators the Art in 6 Supply Chain and our 4PL logistics provider Spreading the Net Nexus, to improve options for NZ Cement cargo owners, to reduce their costs 8 Nexus and facilitate the most efficient flow Ports of Auckland is now host to a POAL’s Point of Difference of their cargo across NZ. We have state of the art, huge white, 30,000 successfully implemented our new 10 Port Development tonne capacity cement storage Port Connect port operating system (Navis N4) dome owned and operated by Great New Tools in July as part of our plan to use technology better and become a Holcim, a major supplier of cement, 12 Market RoundUp smarter port. N4 will support other aggregates and ready-mix concrete smart initiatives such as using to the NZ market. The inflated dome Editorial: Anne Hunter Front cover photo: Looking back at Auckland Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is part of Holcim New Zealand’s city from the heights of a ZMPC crane on to speed up handling at the terminal. Fergusson container terminal he 2014/15 financial year be possible without our customers vigorous. However looking further NZ$100M restructuring which Back cover photo: Ports of Auckland’s new was a good one for Ports of and supply-chain partners, so I’d ahead, Auckland’s story is all about includes the dome in Auckland and landscape featuring the recently constructed Auckland despite a number like to thank you for your continued We are also consulting staff and Holcim white dome shaped cement silo T growth and to accommodate that we a similar new facility at PrimePort carrying out a scoping study on a of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Manurewa Open Space Netw
    Manurewa Open Space Network Plan August 2018 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of the network plan ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Strategic context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Manurewa Local Board area ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Current State ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Treasure ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Enjoy ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Connect .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
    [Show full text]
  • Manurewa Te Rīpoata Ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020
    Te Poari ā-Rohe o Manurewa Te Rīpoata ā-Tau 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Board Annual Report 2019/2020 Volume 2.10 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 MANUREWA LOCAL BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Mihi He kōrero mō tēnei rīpoata Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e Let this vessel that carries my greetings travel About this report uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga by way of the Tāmaki River to the landing place o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. of Tainui canoe at Ōtāhuhu. This annual report tells the story of how Auckland Council has I reira ka tōia aku mihi ki te uru There, let my salutations be borne across the performed in delivering services in the Manurewa Local Board area ki te Pūkaki Tapu o Poutūkeka, isthmus to the Pūkaki lagoon, from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020. i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. there is the place, Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka o Hoturoa Paddling the Manukau Harbour You can read about our progress, expenditure, service CONTENTS performance and challenges faced in 2019/2020. ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. we follow the Āwhitu Peninsula to the headland. It’s part of the wider annual reporting package for Mihi ................................................................... 2 I konā, ka rere taku haere mā te ākau From there we fly down coast the Auckland Council Group and meets our Local Government Act 2002 obligations to report on our ki te pūaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, to the Waikato river mouth, About this report ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Fringe Retail Assessment
    Auckland City Fringe Retail Assessment Prepared for: Waitematā Local Board 30th June, 2016 9/27/2016 1 INTRODUCTION While the Auckland CBD is a popular retail, hospitality, and tourism destination, there are also several strong offerings in the ‘City Fringe’ – the business districts directly neighbouring the CBD. These districts are namely Karangahape Road, Newmarket, Parnell, Ponsonby, and Uptown. With their proximity to the CBD, the City Fringe districts are ideally situated to interact with a large segment of Auckland’s population, and leverage the strong retail trends seen lately in Auckland City. The Waitematā Local Board has commissioned Marketview to assist in developing programmes that will attract retailers and customers to invest in the City Fringe. The purpose of this report is to identify market trends and behaviours in the City Fringe, compare these trends to those observed in the rest of Auckland and NZ to identify any gaps, examine the core customers of the City Fringe and their shopping habits, and identify the potential opportunities for the City Fringe. To analysis is broken into three parts, respectively aiming to identify: • What are the gaps in the City Fringe offering? • Who are the customers of the City Fringe? • What are the opportunities for the City Fringe? DISCLAIMER While every effort has been made in the production of this report, the Bank of New Zealand, Paymark and Marketview Limited are not responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of the information in this report and expressly disclaim any liability to any person for anything done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance on the contents of this report and any losses suffered by any person whether direct or indirect, including loss of profits.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Annual Monitoring Report 2015
    Social Impact Monitoring Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora Annual Monitoring Report 2015 pg. 1 Auckland Region Women’s Corrections Facility and Auckland South Corrections Facility – Kohuora. Social Impact Monitoring: Third Annual Report 2015. June 2016 The baseline, 2013 and 2014 reports were prepared by Dianne Buchan and Chris Cosslett of Corydon Consultants Ltd. This 2015 report is an update of those reports by Quigley and Watts Ltd, drawing on the 2015 data collected by Corydon Consultants Ltd and on the text and layout of the previous authors. Substantial additions include an analysis of data, chapter summaries and overall assessments. Consequently an Executive Summary is now presented. Finally, all reports have been undertaken in accordance with conditions of designation set by the Board of Inquiry for the construction of the Auckland South Corrections Facility (Kohuora) at Wiri. Cover design by Rev Mark Beale, Member of the Community Impact Forum Social Impact Monitoring 2015 Third Annual Report – ARWCF and ASCF Kohuora i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ports of Auckland Assessment of Sediment Quality and Biosecurity for Dumping of Dredged Sediment from the Port of Auckland at the Cuvier Dump Site
    REPORT Ports of Auckland Assessment of Sediment Quality and Biosecurity for Dumping of Dredged Sediment from the Port of Auckland at the Cuvier Dump Site Submitted to: Ports of Auckland Limited PO Box 1281, Auckland 1140 Submitted by: Golder Associates (NZ) Limited Part 3 of 4 PO Box 33-849, Takapuna 0740, Auckland Appendices E to H +64 9 486 8068 1779496-002-R-Rev0 November 2018 November 2018 1779496-002-R-Rev0 APPENDIX E Review of Alternatives to Disposal at Sea REPORT Disposal of Sediment from the Port of Auckland Assessment of Alternative Methods of Disposal or Management Submitted to: Ports of Auckland Limited PO Box 1281, Auckland 1140 Submitted by: Golder Associates (NZ) Limited Level 1, 214 Durham Street Christchurch 8011 New Zealand +64 3 377 5696 1779496-004-R-Rev0 November 2018 November 2018 1779496-004-R-Rev0 Record of Issue Company Version Date Issued Review Status / Detail Ports of Auckland RevA 23 November 2018 Draft for comment Limited Ports of Auckland Rev0 23 November 2018 Final version Limited ii November 2018 1779496-004-R-Rev0 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Disposal
    [Show full text]
  • POAL Volumes up > Supply Chain Perks > Customer Collaboration
    THE MAGAZINE FOR OUR CUSTOMERS SEPTEMBER 20 1 0 > POAL Volumes Up > Supply Chain Perks > Customer Collaboration CONTENTS POAL 2-3 4-5 6-7 POAL OPERATIONS FACE TO FACE: FOCUS Stuart Ferguson FOCUS REVIEW looks back – and Expansion & Upgrades forward for POAL SeaPACK & Empty Depot CRAIG SAIN GENERAL MANAGER SALES & MARKETING 8-9 PORTS OF AUCKLAND CONLINXX Supply chain 10-11 VOLUMES UP efficiency POAL We started our last NEWS FINANCIAL yEAR JULy 2009 in a state of uncertainty AbOUT volumes. In fact, as the 12-13 ENd OF FINANCIAL yEAR AS THEY 2009/10 results show SEE IT: (see pgs 14-15), POAL 14-15 What the MARKET papers say… achieved VERy GOOd ROUND UP volumes particularly BACK PAGE given the globAL DIRECTORY economic crisis. SEPTEMbER 2010 The result was largely due to some place which we are confident will enable us with our customers to get a clear grasp of shipping service changes – including the to deliver a more consistent performance their business and cargo flows so that we consolidation of the North Asia service moving forward. can prepare to the best of our ability, to by Hamburg Sud, COSCo, MOL and NyK service those exchanges efficiently. which based its import call on POAL from Customer COLLAboration July 2009. That decision was a pleasing On the flip side, we hope too that in this confirmation of the lines’ faith in POAL as This is however, a major challenge since closer working relationship, our customers the market these days in our container an optimal NZ location for import cargo.
    [Show full text]