The Lunar Society1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Lunar Society1 1 Primary Source 11.2 THE LUNAR SOCIETY1 The Lunar Society was an informal scholarly society involving many prominent intellectuals and practical men in the late eighteenth century. The society met regularly in Birmingham, England, and fostered the Midlands Enlightenment, a cultural manifestation of the Enlightenment within England. The society was above all concerned with how the development of science and technology could better serve the world. The members and participants frequently also corresponded with each other via letters and discussed topics such as current scientific experiments and research. The decline of the Lunar Society began when the French Revolution caused political strains between members. Riots in Birmingham against Joseph Priestley, a staunch supporter of Unitarianism2 and the French Revolution, led to the society’s further decline. The following account of the society was read by H. Carrington Bolton at the founding of the Lunar Society of New York on 27 April 1888. For a link to the full text click here. The Lunar Society was an informal club or association of scientific men which flourished in Birmingham for nearly forty years. It was founded about the year 1766, by Matthew Boulton,3 Dr. Erasmus Darwin,4 Dr. William Small,5 and their friends; they do not seem to have numbered more than eight or ten at any one time, and they met at each other’s houses for dinner every month on the Monday nearest to the full moon, “in order,” says Dr. Priestley, to have the benefit of its light in returning home.” Hence the name Lunar Society. The members were accustomed to sit down to dinner at two o’clock, and did not part until eight, exchanging views with each other on topics as relating to literature, science, and arts, each contributing his quota of entertainment and instruction. “We had nothing to do,” adds Priestley, “with the religious or political principles of each other, we were united by a common love of Science, which we thought sufficient to bring together persons of all distinctions, Christians, Jews, Mahometans6 and Heathens,7 Monarchist and Republicans.” Each member was allowed to bring with him a friend, and thus many distinguished guests were present at these philosophical banquets. The society occasionally held “meetings extraordinary,” in honor of scientific magnates from abroad. 1 Henry Carrington Bolton, Scientific Correspondence of Joseph Priestley (Philadelphia: Collins Printing House, 1892), 195, 206-207, 209-214, 217-18. 2 Unitarians rejected the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. 3 An English manufacturer and business partner of James Watt (1728–1809). 4 An English physician and founding member of the Lunar Society (1731–1802). 5 He established a medical practice in Birmingham and was a philosophy professor at the College of William and Mary in Virginia (1734–75). 6 A Muslim. 7 One who does not belong to a widely held religion. 2 During the years 1780 to 1785, pneumatic chemistry was the principal topic under discussion, for Priestley and Watt were each contributing his share to the much-vexed question of the constitution of water. Cavendish8 in London, Lavoisier9 in Paris, and Watt10 in Birmingham were three rival claimants for the honor of the discovery of the composition of water. Priestley, as a friend of Watt, communicated speedily the result of his experiments, sometimes it is reasonable to believe, over the festive board of the Lunarians,11 and left the conclusions to be drawn by others. As to the relative merits of the claimants, that is foreign to the purpose of this essay. The Priestley-Wedgwood correspondence shows that in 1783 the philosophers were greatly exercised over Priestley’s discovery of the conversion of water into air, the fallacy of which he himself afterwards admitted. The Phlogistic Theory,12 which had been the controlling spirit in chemical philosophy for nearly a century, received its deathblow at the hands of Priestley himself, when he isolated oxygen on the 1st August, 1774. But he, as is well known, failed to perceive the important bearing of his own discovery, and it was across the channel that Lavoisier and other French chemists were skillfully burying the corpse out of sight. The French theory of combustion was but slowly accepted by the conservative Englishmen, and slowest of all by the friends of Priestley. In the transition period, hydrogen was for a time believed to be the elusive phlogiston; to this phase of doctrine, Boulton alludes in a letter to Wedgwood13 dated March 30th, 1781. “We have long talked of phlogiston without knowing what we talked about: but now that Dr. Priestley hath brought the matter to light, we can pour that element out of one vessel into another, can tell how much of it by accurate measurement is necessary to reduce a calx14 to a metal, which is easily done, and without putting that calx into contact with any visible thing. In short, this goddess of levity can be measured and weighed like other matter. For the rest, I refer you to the doctor himself.” A few months later, Priestley himself wrote to his friend, Josiah Wedgwood: “Before my late experiments, phlogiston was indeed almost given up by the Lunar Society, but now it seems to be re-established” (March 21st, 1782). Again Boulton writes to his partner, Watt, July 3d, 1781. “I dined yesterday at the Lunar Society (Keir’s house); there was Blair, Priestley, Withering, Galton, and an American “rebel,” Mr. Collins. Nothing new, except that some of my white spathos iron ore was found to contain more air than any ore Priestley had ever tried, and what is singular, it contains no common air, but is part fixable and part inflammable.” On September 20th, 1785, Watt wrote to Boulton:— 8 Henry Cavendish (1731–1820) was a British chemist noted for his discovery of hydrogen, which he called “flammable air.” 9 Antoine Lavoisier (1743–94) was a French chemist who discovered the role oxygen plays in combustion. 10 Watt was a Scottish engineer who improved the Newcomen steam engine. 11 The members of the Lunar Society. 12 An obsolete scientific theory that postulated that a fire-like element was released during combustion. 13 Josiah Wedgwood (1730–95) revolutionized the manufacture and marketing of fine porcelainware; he was also a prominent abolitionist . 14 The residual powder when a metal combusts. 3 “The Lunar Society was held yesterday at Mr. Galton’s, at Barr. It was rather dull, there having been no philosophical news lately, except Mr. Kirwan’s discovery of an air from phosphorus, which takes fire of itself on being mixed with common or dephlogisticated air.” We imagine that the philosophers would have hardly regarded their feast as dull, could Mr. Kirwan have shown to them the beautiful yet nauseating experiment of spontaneously inflammable phosphoretted hydrogen.15 And a modern Academy of Sciences would be enthusiastic over such a notable discovery. It has been surmised that the Lunar Society discussed the action of light upon nitrate of silver, and the application of this phenomenon to the production of pictures. This suggestion was made by Mr. W. P. Smith, at a meeting of the Photographic Society of Birmingham in 1863, and was based on the discovery in Mr. Boulton’s library at Soho,16 of certain photographic pictures on metallic plates. It was understood at the time that Boulton’s rooms had been closed for fifty years, but this proved to be an error, and the pictures were probably made by a Miss Wilkinson who had access to the rooms, and who had experimented in photography soon after its invention by Niepce. It is well known that Thomas Wedgwood, son of Josiah, is said to have made “silver pictures” under Sir Humphry Davy’s17 eyes as early as 1791-93, hence during the existence of the Lunar Society. A facsimile of one of these early photographs is prefixed to Miss Meteyard’s “Life of the Younger Wedgwoods,” but she herself throws some doubt on its authenticity. The philosophical converse of the learned men was sometimes enlivened by humorous interludes, such as the following: Dr. Darwin, whose levity in religious matters was notorious, had invented a speaking machine which pronounced “papa,” “mamma,” and other words quite accurately. Mr. Boulton, who perhaps had suffered from the caustic wit of the Doctor, drew up the following satirical contract:— “I promise to pay to Dr. Darwin, of Lichfield, one thousand pounds upon his delivering to me (within two years from date hereof) an instrument called an organ that is capable of pronouncing the Lord’s Prayer, the Creed, and Ten Commandents in the vulgar tongue, and his ceding to me, and me only, the property of said invention with all the advantages thereunto appertaining.” [Signed.] M. BOULTON. Soho September 3d, 1787. Witness, James Keir.18 Witnes, W. Small. A wide range of topics was admitted in the discussions at the informal meetings. Mrs. Schimmel Penninck,19 already quoted, gives a vivid picture of an exciting scene in her father’s house. It was in the summer of 1788, and Matthew Boulton presented to the company his son M. Robinson Boulton, who had just returned from a long sojourn in Paris. 15 A hydride of Phosphorous. 16 Area of the City of Westminster. 17 British chemist (1778–1829) known for discovering several alkali and alkaline earth metals. 18 James Keir (1735–1820) was a Scottish chemist and important member of the society. 19 British anti-slavery writer (1778–1856). 4 “I well remember,” writes Mrs. Schimmel Penninck, “my astonishment at his full dress in the highest adornment of Parisian fashion; but I noticed as a remarkable thing that the company (which consisted of some of the first men in Europe), all with one accord gathered around him and asked innumerable questions, the drift of which I did not fully understand.
Recommended publications
  • Birmingham 2020 – Think Big, Think BACO
    FEATURE Birmingham 2020 – think big, think BACO BY LUCY DALTON When Richard Irving and Ann-Louise McDermott made their successful bid to host BACO 2020 in Birmingham, they knew it had far more going for it than the International Conference Centre! Lucy Dalton tells us a little more about the attractions of England’s second city and interviews the two local organisers. ver thought of England’s growth? Back in the Domesday Book era (geographical) waist as a skinny of 1086, the Manor of Birmingham was no-man’s-land? Well think again: sparsely populated and poor. Valued at 20 EEngland’s midriff is big. Not the ugly, shillings, it would hardly have featured on liposuction-inspiring, blobby fat; rather, that William the Conqueror’s tax-hunting radar. enviable bulky, athletic big that comes with Scattered habitation and gentle waterways years of determination, guts and training. punctuated rolling hills. Enter Peter de Why? Birmingham. Birmingham, new Lord of the Manor. In the Birmingham, UK, is the heavyweight mid-12th century he began holding markets centre of Mid-England. As the UK’s second at his castle, from whence developed a largest city (1.2 million inhabitants), market town. Little did the farmers of the and sistered with cities such as Chicago, time realise that the ring in the ground used Frankfurt, Milan, Johannesburg and for tethering bulls on market days would Changchun, it contends in a league of turn into one of Birmingham’s most iconic its own. Though Spaghetti Junction, a (shopping) landmarks almost a millennium Lucy Dalton convoluted local road network with a later: The Bullring.
    [Show full text]
  • William Withering and the Introduction of Digitalis Into Medical Practice
    [From Schenckius: Observationum Medicarum, Francofurti, 1609.] ANNALS OF MEDICAL HISTORY New Series , Volume VIII May , 1936 Numbe r 3 WILLIAM WITHERING AND THE INTRODUCTION OF DIGITALIS INTO MEDICAL PRACTICE By LOUIS H. RODDIS, COMMANDER, M.C., U.S.N. WASHINGTON, D. C. Part II* N interesting fea- as Dr. Fulton points out, there is no ture regarding the question that Darwin received his first early use of digi- acquaintancewithdigitalis from Wither- talis and the ques- ing. The evidence is indisputable as tion of the priority Withering himself cites the case (No. of Withering in its iv, M iss Hill) and says that Darwin was discovery, has been his consultant. Darwin mentions the brought out by case in his commonplace book but Professor John F. Fulton of Yale Uni- neither there nor in his published ac- versity School of Medicine. He has counts does he mention Withering’s shown that Erasmus Darwin, in an ap- name. His relations with Withering are pendix to the graduation thesis of his shown by some of his letters to have son Charles, which he published in been very unfriendly, at least after 1780, two years after Charles’ death. 1788, and he was probably jealous of gave some account of the use of fox- him. By our present standards Darwin’s glove with several case histories. March conduct in not mentioning Withering 16. 1785, Erasmus Darwin read a paper in either of his papers was distinctly which was dated January 14, 1785, and uncthical. which was published in the medical As he became more prosperous With- transactions, containing a reference to ering purchased a valuable piece of foxglove.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lunar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18Th Century Great Britain
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2011 The unL ar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18th Century Great Britain Scott H. Zurawel Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Zurawel, Scott H., "The unL ar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18th Century Great Britain" (2011). Honors Theses. 1092. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/1092 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i THE LUNAR SOCIETY OF BIRMINGHAM AND THE PRACTICE OF SCIENCE IN 18TH CENTURY GREAT BRITAIN: A STUDY OF JOSPEH PRIESTLEY, JAMES WATT AND WILLIAM WITHERING By Scott Henry Zurawel ******* Submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE March, 2011 ii ABSTRACT Zurawel, Scott The Lunar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in Eighteenth-Century Great Britain: A Study of Joseph Priestley, James Watt, and William Withering This thesis examines the scientific and technological advancements facilitated by members of the Lunar Society of Birmingham in eighteenth-century Britain. The study relies on a number of primary sources, which range from the regular correspondence of its members to their various published scientific works. The secondary sources used for this project range from comprehensive books about the society as a whole to sources concentrating on particular members.
    [Show full text]
  • William Playfair Excerpt More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85554-9 - The Commercial and Political Atlas and Statistical Breviary William Playfair Excerpt More information Introduction Sometime in 1787, just two years before France was plunged into revolu- tion and chaos, the Count of Vergennes delivered a package to the royal court of France for the attention of the king. The gift for Louis XVI had come to Vergennes from Lord Lansdowne, an English politician who was on intimate terms with many in the upper echelons of Parisian society. Vergennes was certain that Louis XVI would be very interested in the contents of the package. The gift was a book written by a young Scottish engineer and en- trepreneur who had recently moved to Paris with hopes of making his fortune. His book had been published in London during the previous year and was entitled The Commercial and Political Atlas but, unlike more conventional atlases in this era of great exploration, it contained no maps. It did contain charts, but of a new and unfamiliar variety. Louis XVI, an amateur of geography and the owner of many fine atlases, examined his acquisition with great interest. Although the charts were novel, Louis had no difficulty in grasping their purpose. Many years later, their author wrote that [the king] at once understood the charts and was highly pleased. He said they spoke all languages and were very clear and easily understood. (Playfair, 1822–3) A further indication of the king’s approval was the royal permit he granted for the establishment of a factory to work metals in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Darwin - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series Erasmus Darwin - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive Erasmus Darwin(12 December 1731 – 18 April 1802) Erasmus Darwin was an English physician who turned down George III's invitation to be a physician to the King. One of the key thinkers of the Midlands Enlightenment, he was also a natural philosopher, physiologist, abolitionist, inventor and poet. His poems included much natural history, including a statement of evolution and the relatedness of all forms of life. He was a member of the Darwin–Wedgwood family, which includes his grandsons Charles Darwin and Francis Galton. Darwin was also a founding member of the Lunar Society of Birmingham, a discussion group of pioneering industrialists and natural philosophers. <b>Early Life</b> Born at Elston Hall, Nottinghamshire near Newark-on-Trent, England, the youngest of seven children of Robert Darwin of Elston (12 August 1682–20 November 1754), a lawyer, and his wife Elizabeth Hill (1702–1797). The name Erasmus had been used by a number of his family and derives from his ancestor Erasmus Earle, Common Sergent of England under Oliver Cromwell. His siblings were: Robert Darwin (17 October 1724–4 November 1816) Elizabeth Darwin (15 September 1725–8 April 1800) William Alvey Darwin (3 October 1726–7 October 1783) Anne Darwin (12 November 1727–3 August 1813) Susannah Darwin (10 April 1729–29 September 1789) John Darwin, rector of Elston (28 September 1730–24 May 1805) He was educated at Chesterfield Grammar School, then later at St John's College, Cambridge. He obtained his medical education at the University of Edinburgh Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • Soho Depicted: Prints, Drawings and Watercolours of Matthew Boulton, His Manufactory and Estate, 1760-1809
    SOHO DEPICTED: PRINTS, DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS OF MATTHEW BOULTON, HIS MANUFACTORY AND ESTATE, 1760-1809 by VALERIE ANN LOGGIE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis explores the ways in which the industrialist Matthew Boulton (1728-1809) used images of his manufactory and of himself to help develop what would now be considered a ‘brand’. The argument draws heavily on archival research into the commissioning process, authorship and reception of these depictions. Such information is rarely available when studying prints and allows consideration of these images in a new light but also contributes to a wider debate on British eighteenth-century print culture. The first chapter argues that Boulton used images to convey messages about the output of his businesses, to draw together a diverse range of products and associate them with one site. Chapter two explores the setting of the manufactory and the surrounding estate, outlining Boulton’s motivation for creating the parkland and considering the ways in which it was depicted.
    [Show full text]
  • James Keir (1735-1820) a Renaissance Man of the Industrial Revolution
    JAMES KEIR (1735-1820) A RENAISSANCE MAN OF THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Kristen M. Schranz James Keir is best remembered as a chemist and industrialist, but he was also an author, translator, geologist, metallurgist, and military captain. He was born in Stirlingshire, Scotland on 29 September 1735 and the last of eighteen children born to John Keir (1686-1743) and Magdaline Lind (1691-1775). Both the Keir and Lind families had considerable wealth and were influential in Edinburgh politics. John served in various capacities on the Town Council before he died in 1743 and Magdaline sold the family estates of Muirton and Queenshaugh to care for her large family, including James who was just eight years old. After studying at the High School in Edinburgh (1742-8), Keir took classes in medicine and chemistry at the University of Edinburgh (1754-7), where Andrew Plummer probably instructed him in practical chemistry. During his tenure at university, Keir also became acquainted with Erasmus Darwin. Their friendship flourished through correspondence, even when Keir left Edinburgh without finishing his degree to join the West Indies militia in 1757. Military Career During his service abroad, Keir maintained his scholarly pursuits. He awoke early each morning to read from the classics and to translate the Greek military historian, Polybius. In 1790, he published An Essay on the Martial Character of Nations. Another forthcoming text, A Dictionary of the Art of War, was advertised that same year but was unfortunately burned at the publisher’s shop. When England was under threat by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1803, Keir again took up his pen to write Reflexions on the Invasion of Great-Britain by the French Armies.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the Americas 1600 to 1800 Jose Amor Y Vazquez
    SCOTLAND AND THE AMERICAS 1600 TO 1800 JOSE AMOR Y VAZQUEZ JOHN BOCKSTOCE T. KIMBALL BROOKER J. CARTER BROWN VINCENT J. BUONANNO MARY MAPLES DUNN GEORGE D. EDWARDS, JR. VARTAN GREGORIAN, Chairman Board of Governors ARTEMIS A. W. JOUKOWSKY of the John Carter Brown FREDERICK LIPPITT Library JOSE E. MINDLIN EUSTASIO RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ CLINTON I. SMULLYAN, JR. FRANK S. STREETER MERRILY TAYLOR CHARLES C. TILLINGHAST, JR. LADISLAUS VON HOFFMANN WILLIAM B. WARREN CHARLES II. WATTS, II Sponsors arid Patrons Sponsors MR. AND MRS. REINALDO HERRERA HR OS WITH A SOCIETY TIIE DRUE HEINZ FOUNDATION THE DUNVEGAN FOUNDATION MR. AND MRS. JAY I. KISLAK MR. SIDNEY LAPIDUS Honorary Patron MR. MAGNUS LINKLATER MR. GEORGE S. LOWRY LORD PERTH OF PERTHSHIRE MR. N. DOUGLAS MACLEOD DR. ALEXANDER C. MCLEOD Patrons Committee MR. AND MRS. ROBERT L. MCNEIL, JR. MRS. STANLEY D. SCOTT THE HONORABLE J. WILLIAM MIDDENDORF, II MR. TIMOTHY C. FORBES, Co-chairmen MR. RICHARD W. MONCRIEF THE HONORABLE J. SINCLAIR ARMSTRONG MR. GEORGE PARKER MR. GEORGE D. EDWARDS. JR. MR. WILLIAM S. REESE MRS. ROBERT H. I. GODDARD MR. AND MRS. DAVID F. REMINGTON DR. ALEXANDER C. MCLEOD MR. ROBERT A. ROBINSON MRS. PETER SAINT GERMAIN MR. MORDECAI K. ROSENFELD MR. J. THOMAS TOUCHTON THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND MR. CHARLES M. ROYCE MRS. JANE GREGORY RUBIN THE HONORABLE J. SINCLAIR ARMSTRONG MR. AND MRS. PETER SAINT GERMAIN MRS. VINCENT ASTOR MR. AND MRS. STANLEY DEFOREST SCOTT MR. LYMAN G. BLOOMINGDALE DR. AND MRS. THOMAS SCULCO DR. JOHN AND LADY ROMAYNE BOCKSTOCE MR. AND MRS. ROBERT B. SHEA MR. AND MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of Robert Carter of Nomini Hall
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1970 The Library of Robert Carter of Nomini Hall Katherine Tippett Read College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Read, Katherine Tippett, "The Library of Robert Carter of Nomini Hall" (1970). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624697. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-syjc-ae62 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LIBRARY OF ROBERT CARTER OF NOMINI HALL A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Katherine Tippett Read 1970 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, May 1970 Jane Cdrson, Ph. D Robert Maccubbin, Ph. D. John JEJ Selby, Pm. D. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to Miss Jane Carson, under whose direction this investigation was conducted, for her patient guidance and criticism throughout the investigation. The author is also indebted to Mr. Robert Maccubbin and Mr. John E. Selby for their careful reading and criticism of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lunar Society
    Ch F-X ang PD e w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu-trac The Lunar Society The Lunar Circle or Society was an informal club or association of significant scientific men which flourished in and around Birmingham for nearly forty years. Origins: The origins of the Lunar Society lie in a pattern of friendships that emerged in the late 1750s. Erasmus Darwin and Matthew Boulton first met in early 1757, possibly through family connections, as Boulton's mother's family were patients of Darwin; or possibly though shared friendships, as both were admirers of the printer John Baskerville and friends of the astronomer and geologist John Michell, a regular visitor to Darwin's house in Lichfield1. Darwin was a physician and poet who had studied at Cambridge and Edinburgh; Boulton had left school at fourteen and started work in his father's business making metal goods in Birmingham at the age of 21. Despite their different backgrounds they shared a common interest in experiment and invention, and their activities would show Darwin's theoretical understanding and Boulton's practical experience to be complementary2. Soon they were visiting each other regularly and conducting investigations into scientific subjects such as electricity, meteorology and geology3. Erasmus Darwin Matthew Boulton In 1758, first Boulton and then Darwin became friends of the Derby-based clockmaker John Whitehurst. The link began with Whitehurst supplying clock movements to Boulton’s manufacturing operation but then extended into other experiments. Boulton, Darwin and Whitehurst were in turn introduced by Mitchell to Benjamin Franklin on his visit to Birmingham in July 1758 "to improve and increase Acquaintance among Persons of Influence"4, and Franklin returned in 1760 to conduct experiments with Boulton on electricity and sound5.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissenters and Liberals in the Drive for Religious Freedom in Virginia
    “An Asylum to the Persecuted and Oppressed of Every Nation and Religion”: Dissenters and Liberals in the Drive for Religious Freedom in Virginia A PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF LIBERTY UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY DR. SAMUEL C. SMITH, CHAIR DR. BRIAN MELTON BY SHELLY D. BAILESS APRIL 21, 2010 LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA Table of Contents INTRODUCTION: 2 CHAPTER 1: HISTORY, HISTORIOGRAPHY, AND DEFINITION OF TERMS 6 History: 6 Historiography: 8 Definition of Terms: 28 Jefferson, Madison, and Locke: 31 CHAPTER 2: THE DISSENTERS: PRESBYTERIANS AND BAPTISTS FROM 1738 TO 1776 38 CHAPTER 3: JEFFERSON AND VIRGINIA’S REVISION OF LAWS: 1776-1781 65 CHAPTER 4: JAMES MADISON AND THE VIRGINIA STATUTE FOR ESTABLISHING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 1782- 1786 90 CONCLUSION: 115 BIBLIOGRAPHY 120 1 Introduction: America‟s religious heritage, our national understanding of the relationship between church and state, and the religious convictions of our Founding Fathers have recently taken prominence in historical and political debate. Professional scholars and journalists continually produce material in their efforts to determine whether the original ideas of the American Republic created a uniquely Christian or secular state. Since the days of colonial settlement the relationship between church and state has been a topic for heated debate. Few political subjects rely on a detailed understanding of history as does the issue of American religious liberty and church-state separation. Knowledge of the political struggle regarding this relationship in Virginia is integral to the larger national debate on the subject, since many of the legislators who first had to contend with the issue were the lawmakers who helped shape the national government.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas and Poetry: Humphry Davy in Bristol, 1798-1801
    1 17 September 2019 Gas and Poetry: Humphry Davy in Bristol, 1798-1801 Frank A.J.L. James University College London* http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0499-9291 This paper is a contribution, historically grounded, to current discussions about how best to understand the relations of science and literature as cultural and social practices. It examines, in some detail, Humphry Davy’s activities during the two and a half years, from the autumn of 1798 to the spring of 1801, that he worked at Thomas Beddoes’s Medical Pneumatic Institution in Bristol. The loose and ever- changing circle of creative individuals who formed around Beddoes and his Institution involved a formidable array of savants including members of the Watt and Wedgwood families as well as Romantics such as Southey, Coleridge and Wordsworth. The micro-chronological approach adopted here reveals the importance of print culture and sociability in the production of texts and knowledge, as well as the striking number and variety of projects proposed by the circle that never came to fruition. Nevertheless, those successful projects, such as Davy’s work on nitrous oxide and the second edition of Wordsworth’s Lyrical Ballads, contributed to making this period one of the key moments in English cultural history. Keywords: Humphry Davy, Thomas Beddoes, Robert Southey, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, William Wordsworth, Bristol, the Medical Pneumatic Institution, Jacobin Politics, Nitrous * Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, England; The Royal Institution, 21 Albemarle Street, London, W1S 4BS, England. E-mail: [email protected]. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the “Robert Southey and Romantic-era literature, culture and science: 1797, 1817, a Bicentennial Conference” held during April 2016 in Clifton.
    [Show full text]