Rhabdomancy and Belomancy, or Divination by the Rod and by the Arrow Author(s): A. W. Buckland Source: The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 5 (1876), pp. 436-450 Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2841115 . Accessed: 15/06/2014 04:45 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.79.223 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:45:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 436 A. W. BUCKLAND.-Rhabdomancyand Belomnancy, would meet the case withoutinterfering with those givenin MNr. Evans's paper,viz.: abv grun Prehistoricclwelling P halfunderground, or pits... or chamber undergroundchamber or artificial cave ... ... B Then, again, althoughthere was a radicalfor a defensivework, therewas none forearthworks of a non-defensivecharacter, which were commonin all parts 'of the world. He thoughtthat the annexedsymbol might be employedin conjunctionwith any other symbolto denotethat a workwas defensiveS4; whilst the symbolemployed in the paper for " campor defensivework " might be used merelyto designate" earthwork."If the code obligedus to markall earthworksas defensiveit wouldlead to error.