As US Dollar Gains, So Do JAXPORT's Ro-Ro Imports
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Security Zones; Tampa Bay, (D) Authority
Coast Guard, DHS § 165.760 arrivals and departures of cruise ships (d) Authority. In addition to 33 U.S.C. via a broadcast notice to mariners. 1231 and 50 U.S.C. 191, the authority for (c) Definition. As used in this section, this section includes 33 U.S.C. 1226. cruise ship means a passenger vessel [COTP Jacksonville 02–066, 68 FR 3186, Jan. greater than 100 feet in length that is 23, 2003] authorized to carry more than 150 pas- sengers for hire, except for a ferry. § 165.760 Security Zones; Tampa Bay, (d) Authority. In addition to 33 U.S.C Port of Tampa, Port of Saint Peters- burg, Port Manatee, Rattlesnake, 1231 and 50 U.S.C. 191, the authority for Old Port Tampa, Big Bend, Weedon this section includes 33 U.S.C. 1226. Island, and Crystal River, Florida. [CGD07–02–042, 67 FR 76991, Dec. 16, 2002, as (a) Location. The following areas, de- amended by USCG–2008–0179, 73 FR 35017, noted by coordinates fixed using the June 19, 2008] North American Datum of 1983 (World Geodetic System 1984), are security § 165.759 Security Zones; Ports of zones: Jacksonville, Fernandina, and Ca- (1) Rattlesnake, Tampa, FL. All water, naveral, Florida. from surface to bottom, in Old Tampa (a) Regulated area. Moving security Bay east and south of a line com- zones are established 100 yards around mencing at position 27°53.32′ N, all tank vessels, cruise ships, and mili- 082°32.05′ W; north to 27°53.36′ N, tary pre-positioned ships during tran- 082°32.05′ W, including on land portions sits entering or departing the ports of of Chemical Formulators Chlorine Fa- Jacksonville, Fernandina, and Canav- cility, where the fenced area is bounded eral, Florida. -
The Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council www.aports.org THE FIVE-YEAR FLORIDA SEAPORT MISSION PLAN PORT CANAVERAL PORT CITRUS PORT OF FERNANDINA PORT OF FORT PIERCE JAXPORT PORT OF KEY WEST PORT MANATEE PORTMIAMI PORT OF PALM BEACH PORT PANAMA CITY PORT OF PENSACOLA PORT OF PORT ST. JOE PORT OF ST. PETERSBURG PORT TAMPA BAY PORT EVERGLADES 2014 2018 OUR MISSION Ports work to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in the state of Florida by fostering the growth of domestic and international waterborne commerce. Charged with facilitating the implementation of seaport capital improvement projects, the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council (FSTED) consists of the port directors of the 15 publicly- owned seaports and a representative from both the Department of Transportation and the Department of Economic Opportunity. The Florida Ports Council administers the FSTED program and staffs the Council. OUR MANDATE Florida’s deepwater seaports, as mandated by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, prepare master plans to guide their development and expansion. Regularly updated plans, consistent with the comprehensive plans of the seaports’ respective local governments, establish goals and objectives, address forecasted needs, and identify five-year capital seaport improvement programs to implement. OUR GOALS Develop world-class cargo and cruise facilities to enhance Florida’s global competitiveness. Build system-wide, seamless intermodal facilities to move port goods and passengers efficiently and cost effectively. Capitalize on increased north-south trade and the Panama Canal expansion to capture more direct all-water service and feeder calls. Strengthen and diversify strategic seaport funding to ensure vital and timely improvements. -
BILL ANALYSIS and FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT Please See Section IX. for Additional Information
The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Community Affairs BILL: CS/CS/SB 426 INTRODUCER: Community Affairs Committee; Transportation Committee; and Senator Boyd SUBJECT: State Preemption of Seaport Regulations DATE: March 24, 2021 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Price Vickers TR Fav/CS 2. Paglialonga Ryon CA Fav/CS 3. RC Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes I. Summary: CS/CS/SB 426 prohibits a local ballot initiative or referendum from restricting maritime commerce in Florida’s seaports. The prohibition applies, but is not limited, to restricting such commerce based on any of the following: Vessel type, size, number, or capacity Number, origin, nationality, embarkation, or disembarkation of passenger or crew or their entry into this state of any local jurisdiction. Source, type, loading, or unloading of cargo. Environmental or health records of a particular vessel or vessel line. The bill prohibits and voids a local ballot initiative or referendum, or any local law, charter amendment, ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy in a local ballot initiative or referendum in violation of the prohibition, adopted before, on, or after the effective date of the act. A municipality or political subdivision thereof, or a special district other than one established for port management by special act of the Legislature, is prohibited from restricting maritime commerce in the seaports with respect to any federally authorized passenger cruise vessel based on any of the following: Vessel type, size, number, or capacity, except when the port is physically unable to accommodate a passenger cruise vessel pursuant to applicable federal or state laws or regulations. -
Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 2198 Edison Avenue ANANTH PRASAD, P.E
Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 2198 Edison Avenue ANANTH PRASAD, P.E. GOVERNOR Jacksonville, FL 32204 SECRETARY Transmitted Electronically July 23, 2014 RE: FDOT Courtesy Review - Draft Ocean Highway and Port Authority and Port of Fernandina Master Plan Update Introduction The Florida Department of Transportation received the Draft Ocean Highway and Port Authority and Port of Fernandina Master Plan Update June 23, 2014. The following are the FDOT Courtesy Review comments. We look forward to reviewing the final Master Plan in the future. The comments offered are suggested revisions and recommendations that are to be included before an adoption into the City of Fernandina Comprehensive Plan. Previously we provided the Master Plan Consultant comments related to grammar and wording in the document. These editorial comments are not included in this courtesy review letter as they are not substantive changes. Overall, the Draft Master Plan addresses the requirements set forth for port strategic plans under F.S. 311.14 (2). FDOT Comments Tables • Page ES-12 shows the Phase 3 Site Layout. The narrative to explain Phase 3 is lacking or needs clarification. • Table 6.1-3 (page 6-13) PM Peak hour Roadway Level of Service Conditions): o Segment Column: Roadway segments should match FDOT LOS report or where there are significant changes in volume or changes in the number of thru lanes. o 2023 Peak Volume Column: The standardized “K” factor should be used when converting AADT to peak hour. What “K’ factor was used to convert AADT to peak hour? In addition, traffic volumes should be averaged when there are more than one count stations within a segment. -
2018 Update of Tables and Figures
2018 Update of Tables and Figures August 2019 INTRODUCTION This document provides an update to the majority of data tables and figures provided in the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan. The annual updating of seaport system plan data allows FDOT to: implement the plan using the latest industry metrics; provide analysis of long-term trends; and, provide a foundation for future five-year plan updates. The information collected for this update are the 2018 seaport metrics including the number of containers in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), cargo tonnages, total number of revenue cruise passengers, and several other items. The primary source of the data is the individual Florida Seaports and the Florida Seaport Five-Year Mission Plans. In addition, some of the data comes from official government sources. Maintaining this data on an annual basis will lay the foundation of information necessary for the 2020 Florida Seaport Plan to build upon. The purpose statement and vision of the 2015 plan are restated below. The updated Figures and Tables follow. It should be noted, not all tables and figures in the 2015 plan were updated as: some data sources are not updated annually; some source data has not been updated; or, the 2015 data is still up to date. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan was prepared in accordance with the statutory requirements of Section 311.14(1), Florida Statutes (F.S.). The development of this plan, along with other modal plans developed under the Freight, Logistics, and Passenger Operations (FLP) Office at the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), provides the Department with a cohesive planning process for all the modal offices. -
Port of Pensacola Tariff 5A
Terminal Tariff 5-A Containing Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations Applicable to Facilities at the PORT OF PENSACOLA (An Enterprise Department of the City of Pensacola) Originally Issued: September 15, 2005 Revisions Effective: JULY 1, 2019 PORT OF PENSACOLA TARIFF NO. 5-A P.O. Box 889 Pensacola, FL 32594-0889 Issued by: Amy S. Miller Port Director Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Other Staff Contacts: Clark Merritt Business Development Manager Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Reference Federal Maritime Commission Carrier List FMC1 Marine Terminal Operator Organization #002049 Revisions Effective: July 1, 2019 P a g e 1 | 81 PORT TERMINAL TARIFF 5-A Table of Contents, Changes, Revisions & Re-Issues ITEM TITLE PAGE EFFECTIVE DATE ISSUE SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS 100 Gulf Seaports Marine Terminal Conference 9 April 25, 2016 3rd Revised 102 Agent or Vessel Agent 10 September 15, 2005 Original 104 Apron, Apron Wharf, Wharf Apron 10 September 15, 2005 Original 106 Arrival Date; Date of Arrival; Arrival 10 September 15, 2005 Original 108 Berth 10 September 15, 2005 Original 110 Bonded Storage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 112 Checking 10 September 15, 2005 Original 114 Container 10 September 15, 2005 Original 116 Day 10 September 15, 2005 Original 118 Dockage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 120 End of Ship’s Tackle 10 September 15, 2005 Original 121 Escort 11 May 1, 2014 Original 122 Escorting 11 May 1, 2014 Original 123 Free Time 11 September 15, 2005 -
Port of Tampa Case Study
PORT OF TAMPA CASE STUDY UNI-GROUP U.S.A. MANUFACTURERS OF UNI PAVING STONES PROJECT: Port of Tampa - Berth 208 Life-cycle Costs Comparisons Tampa Port Authority, Tampa, Florida Berth 208 - Port of Tampa - Pavement Analysis PORT ENGINEER: $8 Carl E. Fielland, Director of Engineering $7 $6 PROJECT ENGINEER: $5 David Volkert and Associates, Inc. $4 Tampa, Florida Cost (millions) $3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: $2 ARMAC Engineers Pavers 14" Unreinforced Concrete Tampa, Florida 10" Reinforced Concrete Asphalt GENERAL CONTRACTOR: David Volkert & Associates Kimmins Contracting Corp. Tampa, Florida Figure 1 PAVING CONTRACTOR: A wide variety of products such as fertilizers, cement, Precise Paving, Inc. coal, chemicals, petroleum, aggregates, steel, fruit, and poultry West Palm Beach, Florida are imported from and exported to countries around the CONCRETE PAVER MANUFACTURER: world, including Mexico, Japan, India, China, Russia, and Canada. Tampa is also a popular cruise ship port with over Paver Systems 225,000 passengers in 1996 and plans for future expansion. West Palm Beach and Orlando, Florida PAVERS: hen the Tampa Port Authority began planning in 1 ® 3 /8" (80mm) UNI-Anchorlock the fall of 1992 for the upland cargo staging area Natural Grey at Berth 208, where a new 900 foot wharf was Phase I - 530,000 sq ft W scheduled for completion in September of 1994, Phase II - 218,000 sq ft interlocking concrete pavers were initially not even considered Warehouse Facility - 40,000 sq ft due to the belief that they were for decorative applications only. Research soon proved otherwise. In their abstract “Selection of a Pavement System for Heavily Loaded Marine Terminal” for the he Port of Tampa, situated on the west coast of Ports ‘95 American Society of Civil Engineers Conference in Florida on Tampa Bay, is the largest port, per ton, in September 1995, Ross T. -
Marine Industry
MARINE INDUSTRY Florida’s ports – and the cruise and cargo ships that call on them – ferry billions of dollars to and through the Sunshine State. Florida’s 15 deep-water ports are the state’s connection to global trade that stretches from Asia to the Americas and across the Atlantic. The ports and harbors across 1,350 miles of coastline support high-wage jobs in the maritime, marine science, and recreational boating space. Together, the sector generates hundreds of millions of dollars in state and local tax revenues, and drives economic prosperity in the communities it serves. Even amid the pandemic, the marine industry is a resilient economic powerhouse propelling Florida’s future. By Jeff Zbar FLORIDATREND.COM DECEMBER 2020 MARINE INDUSTRY FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS Florida ports generate … $117 billion Total economic activity $87.3 billion Waterborne international trade (2018) was 55.6% of Florida’s $156.9 110 MILLION TONS OF CARGO FLOW billion total international trade THROUGH FLORIDA’S PORTS $57.4 billion Containerized cargo to and from Florida FLORIDA SEAPORTS: A LIFELINE FOR GLOBAL TRADE 110 million tons International and domestic cargo Deep ports are big business in garages, and other infrastructure to serve the growing cruise market. Though not a the Sunshine State. port embarkation, the Port of Key West is a popular port of call. Through Florida’s 15 deep-water ports, more than any other state, flow some 110 More resilient is the cargo sector. When the million tons of cargo – including contain- Panama Canal opened its third set of locks ers, bulk cargo, and freighters filled with in 2016, it ushered in a new era of shipping raw goods and petroleum – and millions of traffic through the Central American trade cruise passengers annually. -
Adopted Port Master Plan 2013
PORT ST. JOE PORT MASTER PLAN 2013 Port St. Joe Port Authority Port St. Joe, Florida May 2013 Port of Port St. Joe Mission Statement “The mission of the Port St. Joe Port Authority is to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in the Port St. Joe area and Northwest Florida region by fostering the growth of domestic and foreign commerce.” PREFACE This Port St. Joe Port Master Plan 2013, a significant update of the Port's previously adopted Port Master Plan 2008, was prepared in accordance with Florida Statute 163, Part II. To solicit comment about the document from interested parties, a public workshop was held on November 14, 2012, during a duly noticed Port Authority meeting. In addition to the citizens of Port St. Joe and Gulf County, numerous local, regional, and state agencies as well as private economic development entities were invited to this Stakeholders Meeting. On June 12, 2013, the Port Authority approved the Port Master Plan for transmittal by the City of Port St. Joe to the Department of Economic Opportunity. The first public hearing for the City’s transmittal of the draft Master Plan to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity was held on August 6, 2013. The second public hearing for the adoption of the Master Plan was held on November 21, 2013. At all public hearings, the public were given opportunity to comment. Port St. Joe Port Authority Leonard Costin, Chairman Eugene Raffield, Vice-Chairman Patrick Jones, Secretary Jessica Rish, Treasurer Johanna White Tommy Pitts, Port Director Nadine Lee, Administrative Assistant I The Port Authority and Staff wish to thank all of those who contributed to the preparation of this Master Plan 2013 and particularly to acknowledge those who prepared the previous Port Master Plan 2008: Ms. -
Directions to Port of Tampa
Directions To Port Of Tampa Sometimes monoclonal Johan ensilaged her weakfishes cross-country, but subscapular Kelwin recombined upriver or griming profitlessly. Plentiful Lancelot loafs forehand, he eclipsed his lusters very east-by-north. Spadelike Jacques nauseate, his shakos covers fraternising skippingly. Site and helpful and orpheum, directions to port of tampa cruise terminals at bars, including imported brands offered by an accessible route to the value, though we were so poor food It will be aware that are a third party without the directions to port of tampa had a mile from october and events. You will be funneled back to the tampa port belonging to follow signs. Tampa was initially an isolated frontier outpost. Ifas extension period for well as it! To you and pick you an average of convenient to call your own police officer to port? The twitch at Port Tampa Tampa Historical. While we encountered were caused by agreeing that provides information only, directions to port of tampa bay. Free short-term and a limited amount of conquest long-term parking is stiff at. Expect to stay in this attraction to go, directions to port of tampa cruise passenger luggage. Ferry Connections Cross gulf Ferry. Port of Tampa Florida Directions and Parking Cruise Experts. Passenger loading area, directions to port tampa for? The first one without knowing more to expect, precise and two bedroom suites have plenty of dictionary so Florida travelers can unpack and make the most began their travel time. You were on the rental car, key and his rail lines, of tampa and drop us your own investments in the peace of. -
2015 Trauma Plan
64J-2.007 (b) (3), Florida Administrative Code The trauma agency initial plan or five-year plan update shall contain the following information in the following order: (a) Table of Contents Significant infrastructure changes occurring within Trauma Service Area 10 since 2010 .......................... 1 (b) Population and Geographic Area to be served ...................................................................................... 4 (c) Organizational Structure ...................................................................................................................... 22 (d) Trauma System Structure ..................................................................................................................... 27 (e) Objectives, Proposed Actions, and Implementation Schedule .............................................................. 35 (f) Source of income and anticipated expenses by category for the trauma agency .................................. 36 (g) Trauma agency’s fiscal impact on the trauma system .......................................................................... 36 (h) Transportation System Design ............................................................................................................. 37 (i) TTPs ...................................................................................................................................................... 41 (j) Medical Control and Accountability .................................................................................................... -
America's Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership
America’s Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), the unified voice of America’s seaports, endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the United States and its trading partners in the Pacific. AAPA has long supported trade policies based on equity and fairness. The prosperity of the U.S. is inextricably entwined with that of the rest of the world. We believe this agreement, and others pending, will increase trade and U.S. exports. This increase in trade will provide more jobs in our ports and better wages for our workers. America’s seaports deliver vital goods, ship U.S. exports, create jobs, and support local and national economic growth. Cargo activity at U.S. ports currently accounts for over a quarter of the U.S. economy and $650 billion in personal income, supports the employment of over 23 million American workers, and generates over $320 billion in local, state and federal tax revenues. These enormous impacts will increase further due to the trade growth anticipated as a result of the TPP agreement. For every additional $1 billion in exports shipped through U.S. seaports, 15,000 U.S. jobs are created. Jobs in export-intensive industries pay up to 18 percent more, on average, than jobs in other industries. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is good for American ports and American jobs. AAPA and the following U.S. member ports strongly endorse quick approval of TPP. Alabama State Port Authority Port of Longview American Association of Port Authorities