DOCSLIB.ORG

Adopted Port Master Plan 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adopted Port Master Plan 2013 PORT ST. JOE PORT MASTER PLAN 2013 Port St. Joe Port Authority Port St. Joe, Florida May 2013 Port of Port St. Joe Mission Statement “The mission of the Port St. Joe Port Authority is to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in the Port St. Joe area and Northwest Florida region by fostering the growth of domestic and foreign commerce.” PREFACE This Port St. Joe Port Master Plan 2013, a significant update of the Port's previously adopted Port Master Plan 2008, was prepared in accordance with Florida Statute 163, Part II. To solicit comment about the document from interested parties, a public workshop was held on November 14, 2012, during a duly noticed Port Authority meeting. In addition to the citizens of Port St. Joe and Gulf County, numerous local, regional, and state agencies as well as private economic development entities were invited to this Stakeholders Meeting. On June 12, 2013, the Port Authority approved the Port Master Plan for transmittal by the City of Port St. Joe to the Department of Economic Opportunity. The first public hearing for the City’s transmittal of the draft Master Plan to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity was held on August 6, 2013. The second public hearing for the adoption of the Master Plan was held on November 21, 2013. At all public hearings, the public were given opportunity to comment. Port St. Joe Port Authority Leonard Costin, Chairman Eugene Raffield, Vice-Chairman Patrick Jones, Secretary Jessica Rish, Treasurer Johanna White Tommy Pitts, Port Director Nadine Lee, Administrative Assistant I The Port Authority and Staff wish to thank all of those who contributed to the preparation of this Master Plan 2013 and particularly to acknowledge those who prepared the previous Port Master Plan 2008: Ms. Joan Sanchez of J. D. Sanchez Consulting, Inc; TEC, Inc.; and Martin Associates. This 2013 update used as its foundation that previous 2008 Plan and some of the text and figures are duplicated herein. Port St. Joe Port Master Plan 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PORT PLANNING AREA 1-1 1.2 HISTORY 1-4 1.3 INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 1-6 1.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND AGENCY COORDINATION 1-7 Chapter 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES ..................................................... 2-1 2.1 LAND USE 2-1 2.2 WATER-DEPENDENT USES 2-3 2.3 EXISTING PORT INFRASTRUCTURE 2-3 2.4 INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 2-3 2.4.1 Roadway System ................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4.2 Rail Network ......................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.3 Airports .................................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.4.4 Water Access ....................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.5 UTILITIES 2-12 2.5.1 Potable Water ...................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.5.2 Industrial Process Water ...................................................................................................... 2-12 2.5.3 Wastewater .......................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.5.4 Stormwater and Drainage Facilities .................................................................................... 2-12 2.5.5 Solid Waste .......................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.5.6 Energy ................................................................................................................................. 2-13 2.6 SECURITY 2-13 2.7 NATURAL AND MAN-MADE DISASTER PLANNING 2-13 2.7.1 Coastal Flooding .................................................................................................................. 2-13 2.7.2 Coastal High Hazard Area ................................................................................................... 2-14 2.7.3 Hurricane Evacuation Planning ........................................................................................... 2-17 2.7.4 Man-made Disasters ............................................................................................................ 2-17 Port St. Joe Port Master Plan 2013 ii 2.8 PUBLIC ACCESS FACILITIES 2-18 2.9 HISTORIC RESOURCES 2-18 2.10 ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 2-18 2.10.1 Vegetative Cover and Wildlife Habitat ............................................................................... 2-18 2.10.2 Topography ......................................................................................................................... 2-19 2.10.3 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 2-19 2.10.4 Restricted Use Areas ........................................................................................................... 2-19 2.10.5 Estuarine Conditions ........................................................................................................... 2-21 2.10.6 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products ..................................................................... 2-22 Chapter 3 MARKET ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 3-1 3.1.1 Northwest Florida .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Gulf County ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 THE COMPETITIVE CARGO ARENA 3-2 3.3 MARKET ASSESSMENT 3-2 3.3.1 Biomass ................................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.3.2 Ethanol................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.3 Oil and Coal ........................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.4 Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) ................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.5 Dry and Break Bulk Products ................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.6 Offshore Energy Support ....................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.7 Reliever/Feeder Services ..................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.8 Secondary Port Opportunities .............................................................................................. 3-11 3.3.9 Summary of Market Opportunities ...................................................................................... 3-12 Chapter 4 FIVE- AND TEN- YEAR DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION PLAN ........... 4-1 4.1 PORT DEVELOPMENT FOR TARGET MARKETS 4-1 4.1.1 Short-Term Development Plan: Years 1 to 5 ........................................................................ 4-2 4.1.2 Long-Term Development Plan: Years 6 to 10....................................................................... 4-3 4.1.3 Dredging Considerations ....................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2 DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND IMPACTS 4-6 4.2.1 Dredging Costs ...................................................................................................................... 4-6 Port St. Joe Port Master Plan 2013 iii Table 4-1 Dredging Costs .................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.2.2 Infrastructure Costs for Manufacturing Sites ........................................................................ 4-6 4.2.3 Economic Impacts ................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4-8 4.3.1 Land Use................................................................................................................................ 4-8 4.3.2 Public Access ........................................................................................................................ 4-8 4.3.3 Historic Resources ................................................................................................................. 4-8 4.3.4 Environmental Resources ...................................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.5 Utilities .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan
    Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council www.aports.org THE FIVE-YEAR FLORIDA SEAPORT MISSION PLAN PORT CANAVERAL PORT CITRUS PORT OF FERNANDINA PORT OF FORT PIERCE JAXPORT PORT OF KEY WEST PORT MANATEE PORTMIAMI PORT OF PALM BEACH PORT PANAMA CITY PORT OF PENSACOLA PORT OF PORT ST. JOE PORT OF ST. PETERSBURG PORT TAMPA BAY PORT EVERGLADES 2014 2018 OUR MISSION Ports work to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in the state of Florida by fostering the growth of domestic and international waterborne commerce. Charged with facilitating the implementation of seaport capital improvement projects, the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council (FSTED) consists of the port directors of the 15 publicly- owned seaports and a representative from both the Department of Transportation and the Department of Economic Opportunity. The Florida Ports Council administers the FSTED program and staffs the Council. OUR MANDATE Florida’s deepwater seaports, as mandated by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, prepare master plans to guide their development and expansion. Regularly updated plans, consistent with the comprehensive plans of the seaports’ respective local governments, establish goals and objectives, address forecasted needs, and identify five-year capital seaport improvement programs to implement. OUR GOALS Develop world-class cargo and cruise facilities to enhance Florida’s global competitiveness. Build system-wide, seamless intermodal facilities to move port goods and passengers efficiently and cost effectively. Capitalize on increased north-south trade and the Panama Canal expansion to capture more direct all-water service and feeder calls. Strengthen and diversify strategic seaport funding to ensure vital and timely improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Update of Tables and Figures
    2018 Update of Tables and Figures August 2019 INTRODUCTION This document provides an update to the majority of data tables and figures provided in the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan. The annual updating of seaport system plan data allows FDOT to: implement the plan using the latest industry metrics; provide analysis of long-term trends; and, provide a foundation for future five-year plan updates. The information collected for this update are the 2018 seaport metrics including the number of containers in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), cargo tonnages, total number of revenue cruise passengers, and several other items. The primary source of the data is the individual Florida Seaports and the Florida Seaport Five-Year Mission Plans. In addition, some of the data comes from official government sources. Maintaining this data on an annual basis will lay the foundation of information necessary for the 2020 Florida Seaport Plan to build upon. The purpose statement and vision of the 2015 plan are restated below. The updated Figures and Tables follow. It should be noted, not all tables and figures in the 2015 plan were updated as: some data sources are not updated annually; some source data has not been updated; or, the 2015 data is still up to date. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan was prepared in accordance with the statutory requirements of Section 311.14(1), Florida Statutes (F.S.). The development of this plan, along with other modal plans developed under the Freight, Logistics, and Passenger Operations (FLP) Office at the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), provides the Department with a cohesive planning process for all the modal offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Pensacola Tariff 5A
    Terminal Tariff 5-A Containing Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations Applicable to Facilities at the PORT OF PENSACOLA (An Enterprise Department of the City of Pensacola) Originally Issued: September 15, 2005 Revisions Effective: JULY 1, 2019 PORT OF PENSACOLA TARIFF NO. 5-A P.O. Box 889 Pensacola, FL 32594-0889 Issued by: Amy S. Miller Port Director Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Other Staff Contacts: Clark Merritt Business Development Manager Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Reference Federal Maritime Commission Carrier List FMC1 Marine Terminal Operator Organization #002049 Revisions Effective: July 1, 2019 P a g e 1 | 81 PORT TERMINAL TARIFF 5-A Table of Contents, Changes, Revisions & Re-Issues ITEM TITLE PAGE EFFECTIVE DATE ISSUE SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS 100 Gulf Seaports Marine Terminal Conference 9 April 25, 2016 3rd Revised 102 Agent or Vessel Agent 10 September 15, 2005 Original 104 Apron, Apron Wharf, Wharf Apron 10 September 15, 2005 Original 106 Arrival Date; Date of Arrival; Arrival 10 September 15, 2005 Original 108 Berth 10 September 15, 2005 Original 110 Bonded Storage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 112 Checking 10 September 15, 2005 Original 114 Container 10 September 15, 2005 Original 116 Day 10 September 15, 2005 Original 118 Dockage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 120 End of Ship’s Tackle 10 September 15, 2005 Original 121 Escort 11 May 1, 2014 Original 122 Escorting 11 May 1, 2014 Original 123 Free Time 11 September 15, 2005
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Industry
    MARINE INDUSTRY Florida’s ports – and the cruise and cargo ships that call on them – ferry billions of dollars to and through the Sunshine State. Florida’s 15 deep-water ports are the state’s connection to global trade that stretches from Asia to the Americas and across the Atlantic. The ports and harbors across 1,350 miles of coastline support high-wage jobs in the maritime, marine science, and recreational boating space. Together, the sector generates hundreds of millions of dollars in state and local tax revenues, and drives economic prosperity in the communities it serves. Even amid the pandemic, the marine industry is a resilient economic powerhouse propelling Florida’s future. By Jeff Zbar FLORIDATREND.COM DECEMBER 2020 MARINE INDUSTRY FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS Florida ports generate … $117 billion Total economic activity $87.3 billion Waterborne international trade (2018) was 55.6% of Florida’s $156.9 110 MILLION TONS OF CARGO FLOW billion total international trade THROUGH FLORIDA’S PORTS $57.4 billion Containerized cargo to and from Florida FLORIDA SEAPORTS: A LIFELINE FOR GLOBAL TRADE 110 million tons International and domestic cargo Deep ports are big business in garages, and other infrastructure to serve the growing cruise market. Though not a the Sunshine State. port embarkation, the Port of Key West is a popular port of call. Through Florida’s 15 deep-water ports, more than any other state, flow some 110 More resilient is the cargo sector. When the million tons of cargo – including contain- Panama Canal opened its third set of locks ers, bulk cargo, and freighters filled with in 2016, it ushered in a new era of shipping raw goods and petroleum – and millions of traffic through the Central American trade cruise passengers annually.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership
    America’s Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), the unified voice of America’s seaports, endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the United States and its trading partners in the Pacific. AAPA has long supported trade policies based on equity and fairness. The prosperity of the U.S. is inextricably entwined with that of the rest of the world. We believe this agreement, and others pending, will increase trade and U.S. exports. This increase in trade will provide more jobs in our ports and better wages for our workers. America’s seaports deliver vital goods, ship U.S. exports, create jobs, and support local and national economic growth. Cargo activity at U.S. ports currently accounts for over a quarter of the U.S. economy and $650 billion in personal income, supports the employment of over 23 million American workers, and generates over $320 billion in local, state and federal tax revenues. These enormous impacts will increase further due to the trade growth anticipated as a result of the TPP agreement. For every additional $1 billion in exports shipped through U.S. seaports, 15,000 U.S. jobs are created. Jobs in export-intensive industries pay up to 18 percent more, on average, than jobs in other industries. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is good for American ports and American jobs. AAPA and the following U.S. member ports strongly endorse quick approval of TPP. Alabama State Port Authority Port of Longview American Association of Port Authorities
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Commerce Florida Seaports
    FLORIDA SEAPORTS: CONNECTING COMMERCE Port of Fernandina The Florida Ports Council (FPC), Port of Pensacola Port Panama City is a nonprofit corporation that JAXPORT serves as the professional association for Florida’s 15 public seaports and their management, providing leadership Port of Port St. Joe through a collective voice in the areas of data and research, state and federal advocacy, and marketing and communication. Port Canaveral Port St. Pete Port Tampa Bay Florida’s network of seaports is one of the state’s greatest economic assets, positively affecting every region and every resident. Whether moving over a Port Manatee hundred million tons of cargo annually or millions of cruise passengers, Florida’s Port of Fort Pierce seaports generate and support a vast array of commerce and the FPC believes Port of Palm Beach a strong, strategic, public/private partnership between Florida’s ports and state Port Everglades and local government will enable our diverse seaports to continue their vast economic contributions to every region of our state. PortMiami Port of Key West 502 East Jefferson Street | Tallahassee, Florida 32301 | flaports.org FLORIDA SEAPORTS: Connecting Commerce FLORIDA PORTS SUPPORT… VITAL ECONOMICS Waterborne international trade moving through Florida’s $40 billion $117.6 billion in $4.2 billion in seaports was valued at $83.2 billion 900,000 in personal total economic local and state in 2017, 55% of Florida’s income activity tax revenue representing DIRECT AND total international trade. INDIRECT JOBS INVESTMENTS LOGISTICS Florida’s warehousing and distribution 43% Over the next 5 years, Florida ports plan to invest center sector increased from $3.3 billion Growth in e-commerce to enhance and modernize freight and the logistics industry 1995 to 2015 with no indication of infrastructure, ensuring domestic and global has placed ports in the position slowing down.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
    The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules BILL: CS/CS/CS/SB 426 INTRODUCER: Rules Committee; Community Affairs Committee; Transportation Committee; and Senator Boyd SUBJECT: State Preemption of Seaport Regulations DATE: April 15, 2021 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Price Vickers TR Fav/CS 2. Paglialonga Ryon CA Fav/CS 3. Price Phelps RC Fav/CS Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes I. Summary: CS/CS/CS/SB 426 prohibits a local ballot initiative or referendum from restricting maritime commerce in Florida’s seaports. The prohibition applies, but is not limited, to restricting such commerce based on any of the following: Vessel type, size, number, or capacity. Number, origin, nationality, embarkation, or disembarkation of passenger or crew or their entry into this state of any local jurisdiction. Source, type, loading, or unloading of cargo. Environmental or health records of a particular vessel or vessel line. Any conflicting local ballot initiative or referendum adopted before, on, or after the effective date of the act, and any local law, charter amendment, ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy adopted in such an initiative or referendum is prohibited, void, and expressly preempted to the state. The bill also prohibits a local government, or a political subdivision
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS (Current As of January 1, 2020)
    FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS (Current as of January 1, 2020) • Florida’s public seaports line the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Port Canaveral JAXPORT Port of Pensacola Port Citrus Port of Key West Port of Port St. Joe Port Everglades Port Manatee Port St. Pete Port of Fernandina PortMiami Port Tampa Bay Port of Fort Pierce Port Panama City Port of Palm Beach • Waterborne international trade moving through these seaports was valued at $87.3 billion in 2018. This $87.3 billion represented 55.6 percent of Florida’s $156.9 billion total international trade. • Of the $87.3 billion in waterborne international trade, $54.2 billion were in imports; $33.1 billion in exports. • In 2018, containerized cargo vessels carried $57.4 billion in trade to and from Florida, up 5.5 percent over the prior year. About $33.6 billion, or 58.6 percent, were imports and $23.7 billion, or 41.4 percent, were exports. • Florida’s waterborne international and domestic cargo for 2018 remained stable at 110 million tons. • The value of containerized cargo increased by 5.5 percent to $57.4 billion, with more than 4.1 million TEUs handled at Florida seaports in FY 2018. • At 53.6 million tons, domestic cargo representing 48.7 percent of all cargo moving through Florida seaports. • Florida ranked as the eighth-largest export state in 2018. • While Brazil – the state’s largest trade partner – gained a modest 3.1% overall, second-ranked China expanded by another 11.2% in 2018 thanks to double-digit growth in imports. • The state’s top ten trade partners were: Brazil, China, Chile, Japan, Colombia, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Germany, Honduras and Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Trade 1/29/2020 - 1/30/2020 Tampa, FL
    Shifting Trade 1/29/2020 - 1/30/2020 Tampa, FL Paul Scott Abbott Erik Autor Freelance Writer President 201 Valhalla Dr National Association of Foreign Trade Zones Cleveland, GA 30528-4277 14th Street NW, Suite 1071 United States Washington, DC 20045 tel: (706) 865-9796 tel: (202) 626-8104 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Vijaykumar Agrawal Davinder Badial AMPE, PH.D. Vice President, Americas Ports & Marine, Senior Port Planner, Master Planning Transportation Port of Long Beach AECOM 415 W. Ocean Blvd. 7650 corporate center drive Long Beach, CA 90802 Ste 400 tel: (562) 283-7150 x 7154 Miami, FL 33126-1220 email: [email protected] United States tel: (305) 514-2488 email: [email protected] Katherine Bailey US Army Corps of Engineers A. Paul Anderson 701 San Marco Blvd President & CEO JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 Port Tampa Bay tel: (904) 232-2070 1101 Channelside Drive, 4th Floor email: [email protected] Tampa, FL 33602 tel: (813) 905-5101 email: [email protected] Flavio Batista Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean Edward Anthes-Washburn 300 Interpace Parkway Executive Director Suite A300 Port of New Bedford Parsippany, NJ 07054 52 Fisherman's Wharf United States New Bedford, MA 02740-7261 tel: (201) 505-5148 tel: (508) 961-3000 email: [email protected] email: Edward.Anthes-Washburn@newbedford- Basil Binns ma.gov Assistant Director Matthew Appice PortMiami Chief Commercial Officer 1015 N. America Way, Ste 210 Port Manatee Miami, FL 33132 300 Tampa Bay Way tel: (305) 347-5503 Ste 1 email: [email protected] Palmetto, FL 34221-6603 United States tel: (941) 722-6621 email: [email protected] 2/7/2020 Page 1 of 14 Shifting Trade 1/29/2020 - 1/30/2020 Tampa, FL Patrick Blair P.E., S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Pensacola Tariff 5A
    Terminal Tariff 5-A Containing Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations Applicable to Facilities at the PORT OF PENSACOLA (An Enterprise Department of the City of Pensacola) Originally Issued: September 15, 2005 Revisions Effective: February 1, 2021 PORT OF PENSACOLA TARIFF NO. 5-A P.O. Box 889 Pensacola, FL 32594-0889 Issued by: Amy S. Miller Port Director Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Other Staff Contacts: M. Clark Merritt Deputy Port Director Telephone: 850-436-5070 Fax: 850-436-5076 Email: [email protected] Reference Federal Maritime Commission Carrier List FMC1 Marine Terminal Operator Organization #002049 Revisions Effective: February 1, 2021 P a g e 1 | 81 PORT TERMINAL TARIFF 5-A Table of Contents, Changes, Revisions & Re-Issues ITEM TITLE PAGE EFFECTIVE DATE ISSUE SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS 100 Gulf Seaports Marine Terminal Conference 9 April 25, 2016 3rd Revised 102 Agent or Vessel Agent 10 September 15, 2005 Original 104 Apron, Apron Wharf, Wharf Apron 10 September 15, 2005 Original 106 Arrival Date; Date of Arrival; Arrival 10 September 15, 2005 Original 108 Berth 10 September 15, 2005 Original 110 Bonded Storage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 112 Checking 10 September 15, 2005 Original 114 Container 10 September 15, 2005 Original 116 Day 10 September 15, 2005 Original 118 Dockage 10 September 15, 2005 Original 120 End of Ship’s Tackle 10 September 15, 2005 Original 121 Escort 11 May 1, 2014 Original 122 Escorting 11 May 1, 2014 Original 123 Free Time 11 September 15, 2005
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Ports the Seaport Effect Port Canaveral Port Citrus
    State of Florida Ports FLORIDA SEAPORTS CHARTING OUR FUTURE 2012/2013 The Seaport Effect Port Canaveral Port Citrus Port Everglades Port of Fernandina Port of Fort Pierce Port of Jacksonville Port of Key West Port Manatee PortMiami Port of Palm Beach Port Panama City Port of Pensacola Port of Port St. Joe Port of St. Petersburg Port of Tampa Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council www.flaports.org TABLE OF CONTENTS SEAPORTS – FLORIDA’S LASTING ADVANTAGE 2 FLORIDA SEAPORT PROFILES SEAPORTS CHARTING OUR FUTURE Port Canaveral 12 Port Citrus 15 Port Everglades 16 Port of Fernandina 19 Port of Fort Pierce 21 Port of Jacksonville 23 Port of Key West 26 Port Manatee 28 PortMiami 30 Port of Palm Beach 33 Port Panama City 36 Port of Pensacola 38 Port of Port St. Joe 40 Port of St. Petersburg 42 Port of Tampa 43 Florida Ports Council Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council 502 East Jefferson Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 850.222.8028 www.flaports.org Prepared February 2013 Follow us on Twitter and Facebook: Coastal Communications and Public Relations, Inc. SEAPORTS – FLORIDA’S LASTING ADVANTAGE Florida provides a strong seaport transportation network that is invigorating the economy now and will continue to build it for future Seaports are generations. The state’s 15 seaports are a crucial conduit, helping to experiencing a cycle of bring a full range of goods and services to people around the world. important change that They operate safely and securely, with an unwavering commitment to is reshaping Florida’s safeguarding the environment, and they infuse millions of dollars into logistics landscape, the economy, supporting millions of well-paying jobs in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Park Parcel 1 41,873 Square Foot Vacant Site Southeast Corner of Main Street & Spring Street Pensacola, Florida
    MARITIME PARK PARCEL 1 41,873 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SITE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAIN STREET & SPRING STREET PENSACOLA, FLORIDA PART ONE: INTRODUCTION ii SELF CONTAINED APPRAISAL REPORT TITLE PAGE PROJECT NAME Maritime Park Parcel 1 41,873 Square Foot Vacant Site LOCATION Southeast Corner of Main Street & Spring Street Pensacola, Florida DATE OF VALUE DATE OF REPORT March 30, 2012 March 30, 2012 PREPARED FOR Community Maritime Park Associates, Inc. C/O Edward E. Spears City of Pensacola 5th Floor, City Hall 222 West Main Street Pensacola, Florida 32521-0062 Fruitticher Lowery Appraisal Group 3000 Langley Avenue, Suite 402 Pensacola, Florida 32504 iii 3000 LANGLEY AVENUE * SUITE 402 * PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32504 * (850) 477-0419 FAX (850)477-7931 March 30, 2012 Community Maritime Park Associates, Inc. C/O Edward E. Spears City of Pensacola 5th Floor, City Hall 222 West Main Street Pensacola, Florida 32521-0062 Letter of Transmittal RE: A Self-Contained Appraisal Report of the Maritime Park Parcel 1 Dear Mr. Spears: At your request, an inspection has been made of the above referenced property for the purpose of estimating the current market value of the fee simple interest. In compliance with the "Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice", this letter of transmittal is followed by a self-contained appraisal report in which all applicable approaches to value are used and with the value conclusion reflecting all known information about the subject property, current and projected market conditions, and other available data. This report contains to the fullest extent possible and practical, explanations of the data, reasoning and analysis used to develop the opinion of value.
    [Show full text]