DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Pt Angkasa Pura 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1. PT ANGKASA PURA 1 Sejarah PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) – atau dikenal juga dengan Angkasa Pura Airports - sebagai pelopor pengusahaan kebandarudaraan secara komersial di Indonesia bermula sejak tahun 1962. Ketika itu Presiden RI Soekarno baru kembali dari Amerika Serikat. Beliau menegaskan keinginannya kepada Menteri Perhubungan dan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum agar lapangan terbang di Indonesia dapat setara dengan lapangan terbang di negara maju. Tanggal 15 November 1962 terbit Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 33 Tahun 1962 tentang Pendirian Perusahaan Negara (PN) Angkasa Pura Kemayoran. Tugas pokoknya adalah untuk mengelola dan mengusahakan Pelabuhan Udara Kemayoran di Jakarta yang saat itu merupakan satu-satunya bandar udara internasional yang melayani penerbangan dari dan ke luar negeri selain penerbangan domestik. Setelah melalui masa transisi selama dua tahun, terhitung sejak 20 Februari 1964 PN Angkasa Pura Kemayoran resmi mengambil alih secara penuh aset dan operasional Pelabuhan Udara Kemayoran Jakarta dari Pemerintah RI. Tanggal 20 Februari 1964 itulah yang kemudian ditetapkan sebagai hari jadi perusahaan. Pada tanggal 17 Mei 1965, berdasarkan PP Nomor 21 tahun 1965 tentang Perubahan dan Tambahan PP Nomor 33 Tahun 1962, PN Angkasa Pura Kemayoran berubah nama menjadi PN Angkasa Pura, dengan maksud untuk lebih membuka kemungkinan mengelola bandar udara lain di wilayah Indonesia. Secara bertahap, Pelabuhan Udara Ngurah Rai (Denpasar), Pelabuhan Udara Halim Perdanakusumah (Jakarta), Pelabuhan Udara Polonia (Medan), Pelabuhan Udara Juanda (Surabaya), Pelabuhan Udara Sepinggan (Balikpapan), dan Pelabuhan Udara Hasanuddin (Ujungpandang) kemudian berada dalam pengelolaan PN Angkasa Pura. Selanjutnya, berdasarkan PP Nomor 37 tahun 1974, status badan hukum perusahaan diubah menjadi Perusahaan Umum (Perum). Dalam rangka pembagian wilayah pengelolaan bandar udara, berdasarkan PP Nomor 25 Tahun 1986 tanggal 19 Mei 1986, nama Perum Angkasa Pura diubah menjadi Perusahaan Umum Angkasa Pura I. Hal ini sejalan dengan dibentuknya Perum Angkasa Pura II yang sebelumnya bernama Perum Pelabuhan Udara Jakarta Cengkareng, secara khusus bertugas untuk mengelola Bandara Soekarno-Hatta Jakarta. Kemudian, berdasarkan PP Nomor 5 Tahun 1992, bentuk Perum diubah menjadi Perseroan Terbatas (PT) yang sahamnya dimiliki sepenuhnya oleh Negara Republik Indonesia sehingga namanya menjadi PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero). Saat ini, Angkasa Pura Airports mengelola 13 tiga belas) bandara di kawasan tengah dan timur Indonesia, yaitu: 1.Bandara I Gusti Ngurah Rai - Denpasar Bandara Ngurah Rai Bali merupakan Bandara terbesar yang dikelola oleh Angkasa Pura Airport. Amgkasa Pura Airport atau PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) adalah BUMN yang bergerak dibidang Pengelolaan Jasa Kebandarudaraan. Angkasa Pura Airport mengelola 13 Bandar Udara yang tersebar di kawasan Tengah dan Timur Indonesia. Sebagai satu-satunya Bandara di Pulau Bali, menjadikan Bandara Ngurah Rai sebagai Pintu Gerbang utama menuju Wilayah Tengah dan Timur Indonesia.Bandara Ngurah Rai dibangun pada tahun 1930 oleh Departement Voor Verkeer en Waterstaats (semacam Departemen Pekerjaan Umum). Landas pacu berupa airstrip sepanjang 700m dari rumput di tengah ladang dan pekuburan di desa Tuban. Karena lokasinya berada di Desa tuban, masyarakat sekitar menamakan airstrip ini sebagai Pelabuhan Udara Tuban. Bidang Usaha Bandara Ngurah Rai PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Cabang Bandar Udara Internasional Ngurah Rai Bali adalah perusahaan penyedia jasa kebandarudaraan (airports services). Terbagi atas 2 bidang usaha yaitu Jasa Aeronautika dan Jasa Non-Aeronautika. Jasa Aeronautika adalah jasa layanan yang diberikan kepada perusahaan penerbangan dan penumpang, yang terdiri dari: Aircraft Parking adalah jasa penempatan dan penyimpanan pesawat udara. Pelayanan yang diberikan oleh PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Cabang Bandar Udara I Gusti Ngurah Rai Bali adalah dengan menyediakan tempat parkir pesawat (apron). Apron di Bandar Udara I Gusti Ngurah Rai dibagi menjadi 2 bagian yaitu: Apron Utara, seluas 300.200 M2. Memiliki daya tampung 37 parking stand yang diperuntukkan bagi penerbangan berjadwal (reguler flight). Mampu melayani pesawat berbadan lebar (wide body) dengan type terbesar B747 seri 400; Apron Selatan, seluas 74.125 M2. Memiliki daya tampung 16 parking stand. Diperuntukkan bagi penerbangan tidak berjadwal (unscheduled flight) dan charter. Menampung pesawat berbadan kecil (narrow body). Passenger Processing, adalah jasa layanan penumpang. Pelayanan yang diberikan oleh PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Cabang Bandar Udara I Gusti Ngurah Rai Bali adalah dengan menyediakan gedung terminal penumpang berserta fasilitas penunjang lainnya seperti fasilitas check in, transit, boarding dan trolley. Gedung terminal penumpang dapat dibagi menjadi 2, yaitu: o Terminal Internasional, seluas 120.000 M2. Menampung 16 juta penumpang per tahun dan dilengkapi dengan 11 garbarata o Terminal Domestik, seluas 65.800 M2. Mampu menampung 9 juta penumpang per tahun dan dilengkapi dengan 3 garbarata. Jasa Non-Aeronautika, adalah jasa layanan pendukung kebutuhan perusahaan penerbangan dan penumpang. Dalam pemenuhannya PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Cabang Bandar Udara I Gusti Ngurah Rai Bali bekerja sama dengan mitra usaha. Bidang usaha ini dapat dibagi menjadi 6 bagian, antara lain: Food and Beverages, jasa layanan penyedia makanan dan minuman, baik di dalam maupun di luar terminal penumpang. Retail, layanan jasa penyedia perbelanjaan untuk kebutuhan penumpang (souvenir, buku, dll), termasuk di dalamnya duty free shops. Advertising, layanan jasa penyedia ruang iklan sebagai media promosi dan publikasi. Property, layanan jasa penyedia sewa ruang usaha (space), di lingkungan Bandar Udara I Gusti Ngurah Rai. Parkir Kendaraan, layanan jasa penyedia area parkir kendaraan penumpang maupun penjemput dan pengantar. Terdiri dari gedung parkir 5 lantai dengan kapasitas 1.600 unit kendaraan roda 4 dan lahan parkir yang mampu penampung 1.963 unit. Cargo Service, layanan pengelolaan pengiriman barang. Fasilitas Bandara Ngurah Rai Landasan Pacu Berukuran 45 M x 3.000 M dengan konstruksi perkerasan beton dan aspal, PCN 83/F/C/X/T, dapat digunakan pesawat kelas B 747-400 untuk menempuh jarak setara Denpasar – Tokyo tanpa pembatasan beban. Fasilitas Sisi Udara Aerodome Refference Code : 4E Runway Operation Category : Cat I Dimensi Runway : (3.000 x 45) M Runway Strip : (3.120 x 300) M Taxiway –Perpendicular : 5 – Dimensi : 3 x (148,5 x 23) M (600 x 23) M (600 x 23) M –Rapid Exit : 2 – Dimensi : 2 x (237,62 x 23) M Apron F1 : 9 ( F1 = B-747, A-300, A-330, A-340, B-777) F2 : 4 ( F2 = DC-10, A-310, A-320, A-319, MD-11, B-767) F3 : 25 ( F3 = B-737, DC-9, Fokker-100, MD-82, MD-90) F4 : – ( F4 = Fokker-50, Fokker-28, Fokker 27, Cassa-212, ATR-42, ATR-72) Luas Apron : 269.367 M² Apron Cargo : Gabungan dengan pesawat penumpang Fire Fighting Category : Cat – IX Helipad : 675 M² Lahan GSE : 24.490 M² Fasilitas Sisi Darat Terminal Penumpang Internasional : 65.898,5 M² Terminal Penumpang Domestik : 14.791,86 M² Parkir Kendaraan : 51.348 M² VIP I : 633 M² VIP II : 400 M² Cargo International Area : 3.708 M² Cargo Domestik Area : 2.574 M² Inflight Catering : 5.720 M² (PT. Angkasa Citra Sarana / ACS) Inflight Catering II : 3.040 M² (PT. Jasapura Angkasa Boga) Aircraft Refueling Capacity : (PT. Pertamina (Persero)) 3 Buah Tangki Pendam : 6.481.000 liter 3 Buah Tangki Pendam : 13.528.000 liter Fasilitas Search&Rescue (SAR) : Tersedia Trolley : Tersedia Landasan – taxi Beberapa “landasan – taxi – keluar” dan “landasan – taxi – sejajar” dengan konstruksi aspal dan beton meningkatkan kapasitas landasan pacu. Pelataran Parkir Pesawat Kapasitas Pelataran Parkir Pesawat adalah 7 posisi pesawat kelas B 747-400,6 posisi pesawat kelas A 320, dan 25 posisi untuk kelas B 737, (dalam waktu bersamaan). Helipad Untuk pendaratan helikopter, tersedia tiga buah helipad. Depot Pengisian Bahan Bakar Pesawat Udara (DPPU). Tersedia fasilitas DPPU dengan kapasitas simpan 6.540 kiloliter yang dioperasikan oleh Pertamina untuk pelayanan pengisian BBM bagi pesawat udara, baik dengan menggunakan hidran maupun kendaraan tanki, jenis bahan bakar avtur dan avigas. Unit Pertolongan Kecelakaan Tersedia Unit Pertolongan Kecelaka-an Penerbangan & Pemadam Kebakaran (PKP&PK) dengan peralatan yang lengkap sesuai dengan Katagori 9 menurut persyaratan ICAO. Penghargaan Yang Diperoleh Bandara Ngurah Rai : Penghargaan pelayanan publik dari departemen perhubungan tanggal 6 september 2005 Bumn terbaik 2005 kategori infrastruktur, konstruksi, perhubungan dan kawasan industri oleh investor (media investasi & keuangan) Bandara internasional terbaik di indonesia dari aspek keamanan & keselamatan tahun 2007 yang diberikan oleh departemen perhubungan republik indonesia. Peringkat satu dalam penyediaan dan pengelolaan toilet umum bersih tahun 2007 yang diberikan oleh menteri kebudayaan dan pariwisata sebagai bandar udara internasional terbersih. Penilaian unit pelayanan publik di lingkungan departemen perhubungan tahun 2007 Wajib pajak terbaik kabupaten badung tahun 2007 (best region tax-payer of badung regency year 2007) Penghargaan kecelakan nihil (zero accident) dalam melaksanakan program kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja tahun 2008 yang diberikan oleh departemen tenaga kerja & transmigrasi. Bandara berkinerja terbaik 2007 kategori Bandara Growth dan Take Off yang diberikan oleh Direktur Utama PT. (Persero) Angkasa Pura I. Penghargaan citra pelayanan prima pada tahun 2008 diberikan oleh
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
  • Analisa Harapan Dan Persepsi Penumpang Terhadap Kualitas Makanan Yang Disediakan Oleh Maskapai Penerbangan Domestik Di Indonesia

    Analisa Harapan Dan Persepsi Penumpang Terhadap Kualitas Makanan Yang Disediakan Oleh Maskapai Penerbangan Domestik Di Indonesia

    ANALISA HARAPAN DAN PERSEPSI PENUMPANG TERHADAP KUALITAS MAKANAN YANG DISEDIAKAN OLEH MASKAPAI PENERBANGAN DOMESTIK DI INDONESIA Christine Tantrisna dan Kanya Prawitasari Alumnus Program Manajemen Perhotelan, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya Abstrak: Penumpang pesawat terbang memiliki harapan tertentu terhadap maskapai penerbangan yang digunakan, salah satunya dari segi kualitas makanan yang disediakan selama penerbangan. Apa yang penumpang terima belum tentu sesuai dengan apa yang diharapkan. Penelitian ini mengukur perbedaan harapan dan persepsi penumpang terhadap kualitas makanan berdasarkan 7 variabel yaitu: warna, penampilan, bentuk, tekstur, aroma, tingkat kematangan, dan rasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada gap yang signifikan antara harapan dan persepsi. Kata kunci: harapan, persepsi, kualitas makanan, maskapai penerbangan domestik, indonesia. Abstract: Passengers have certain expectations about the airline they use; one of them is about food quality served during flight. What passengers get is not always suitable with what they expect. This research examines the difference between expectation and perception of food quality by seven variables, namely: color, performance, shape, texture, aroma, degree of doneness, and taste. The result shows that there is a significant gap between expectation and perception. Keywords: expectation, perception, food quality, domestic airlines, indonesia. Sebagai bisnis yang bergerak di sektor jasa atau bahwa kualitas makanan memegang peranan penting layanan, bisnis penerbangan menyediakan beberapa dalam mempengaruhi mereka dalam memilih fasilitas bagi para penumpang dimana salah satunya maskapai penerbangan. Ditambah lagi, 39% respon- adalah fasilitas pemberian makanan dan minuman den mengatakan bahwa mereka mengharapkan saat penerbangan atau yang biasa disebut inflight kualitas makanan yang lebih baik ketika kompetisi catering. Layanan inflight catering telah dimulai mulai muncul di rute tertentu.
  • (Eu) 2015/ 1014

    (Eu) 2015/ 1014

    27.6.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that Union list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information and the verifications carried out by the Commission, the Union list should now be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Union list.
  • Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)

    Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.470 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 11, 2018 Cancellation Date: July 11, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, !CAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions ofdefunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designatorsfor Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services.
  • Bab Iii Analisis Deskriptif 3.1 Data Umum 3.1.1 Sejarah Pt

    Bab Iii Analisis Deskriptif 3.1 Data Umum 3.1.1 Sejarah Pt

    BAB III ANALISIS DESKRIPTIF 3.1 DATA UMUM 3.1.1 SEJARAH PT GAPURA ANGKASA Tuntutan kegiatan operasional pada dunia kedirgantaraan yang mengharuskan maskapai penerbangan agar dapat memberikan pelayanan operasional secara cepat, tepat, dan akurat tanpa mengabaikan prosedur keselamatan semakin jelas terlihat pada era modern seperti sekarang ini. Demikian juga yang dirasakan oleh PT Garuda Indonesia selaku maskapai penerbangan nasional milik Republik Indonesia, dimana selama ini maskapai tersebut menangani secara tunggal proses operasional kegiatan penerbangan yang ada yakni mulai dari keberangkatan pesawat (pre flight) hingga kedatangan pesawat (post flight) tanpa adanya keterlibatan pihak perantara yang bertindak sebagai jasa penunjang pelayanan kegiatan operasional darat (ground handling). Atas dasar hal tersebutlah mengapa kemudian PT Gapura Angkasa selaku perusahaan ground handling yang menangani secara khusus maskapai penerbangan Garuda Indonesia didirikan. PT Gapura Angkasa sendiri berdiri pada tanggal 26 Januari 1998 dengan nama perusahaan pada saat awal berdiri yakni Gapura, dimana dalam pendiriannya perusahaan ini di modali oleh tiga perusahaan BUMN yakni PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero), serta PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero). Kerjasama antara ketiga perusahaan milik negara tersebut mengacu pada Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dengan Nomor SR 04/MK/016/1996 dan juga 23 akta no.32 tanggal 26 Januari tahun 1998. Identitas PT Gapura Angkasa sebagai perusahaan ground handling bagi maskapai penerbangan nasional nomor wahid tersebut juga dipertegas dengan mayoritas kepemilikan saham PT Garuda Indonesia di PT Gapura Angkasa yang jumlahnya mencapai 1.263.360 (Satu Juta Dua Ratus Enam Puluh Tiga Ribu Tiga Ratus Enam Puluh) atau dengan prosentase saham persero sebesar 58,75 % mulai tanggal 9 Desember 2014.
  • Demand in Indonesian Domestic Air Travel Market After Deregulation

    Demand in Indonesian Domestic Air Travel Market After Deregulation

    Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 147 Conference on Global Research on Sustainable Transport (GROST 2017) DEMAND IN INDONESIAN DOMESTIC AIR TRAVEL MARKET AFTER DEREGULATION Basri Fahriza1,2, Frank Willey1 1. RMIT University, 2. STMT Trisakti. corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: This research is exploring the change of domestic air travel market demand in Indonesia prior and post deregulation. Changes on policies in Indonesian aviation were contributed to the present day market. This historical overview will examine the ‘oligopoly policy’ with only five airlines and the deregulation process that began in 1999. The research then analyses the demand for domestic air travel. Exponential Moving Average Growth were using to analysing data to forecasting the number of passenger from year 2007 to 2015 in yearly basis. Demand is then analysed on three separate airline routes in Indonesia they are Jakarta-Medan, Jakarta-Surabaya, and Jakarta-Pontianak. Keywords: Demand, Domestic Air Travel, Deregulation, Passeneger, Indonesia. Introduction Deregulation in Indonesia start when governments remove restrictions on airlines business Indonesia to encourage the efficient, competitive and consumer oriented marketplace in Indonesian airline industry (Williams, 1993). Secretary General of the Ministry of Communications Anwar Suprijadi said the decision to deregulate was taken in a bid to promote fair competition in domestic airline services, (“Govt insists on licensing more airlines,” 1999). And resulting numbers of new Indonesian airlines emerged predominantly mostly in the cut-fare sector including Lion Air; Indonesia’s Air Asia, former Adam Air, former Batavia Air and Sriwijaya Air, radically changing the nature of the airline business in Indonesia with present of low cost carrier.
  • Vol-5, Issue 2

    Vol-5, Issue 2

    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly.
  • Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock

    Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock

    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.2 $9.00 FEBRUARY 2020 | ainonline.com « Joby Aviation’s S4 eVTOL aircraft took a leap forward in the race to launch commercial service with a January 15 announcement of $590 million in new investment from a group led by Japanese car maker Toyota. Joby says it will have the piloted S4 flying as part of the Uber Air air taxi network in early adopter cities before the end of 2023, but it will surely take far longer to get clearance for autonomous eVTOL operations. (Full story on page 8) People HAI’s new president takes the reins page 14 Safety 2019 was a bad year for Part 91 page 12 Part 135 FAA has stern words for BlackBird page 22 Remote ID NPRM maps out UAS airspace integration plans by Charles Alcock Stakeholders have until March 2 to com- in planned urban air mobility applications. Read Our SPECIAL REPORT ment on proposed rules intended to provide The final rule resulting from NPRM FAA- a framework for integrating unmanned air- 2019-100 is expected to require remote craft systems (UAS) into the U.S. National identification for the majority of UAS, with Airspace System. On New Year’s Eve, the exceptions to be made for some amateur- EFB Hardware Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pub- built UAS, aircraft operated by the U.S. gov- When it comes to electronic flight lished its long-awaited notice of proposed ernment, and UAS weighing less than 0.55 bags, (EFBs), most attention focuses on rulemaking (NPRM) for remote identifica- pounds.
  • Publications 2019

    Publications 2019

    AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha ASEAN Aviation Integration Platform (AAIP) Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Air Power Centre of Indonesia Air and Space Law Studies, International Business Law Program Universitas Prasetiya Mulya Member of German Aviation Research Society The views expressed are those of the author. 2 AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1. The Liberalization Progress in Indonesia ................................................................................... 5 2. The State of Play ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. The Current Legal Regime and Its Limits .................................................................................. 9 4. Benefits from Relaxing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines ...................... 10 5. The Way Forward and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 12 Table 1: Domestic Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017 ........................................... 7 Table 2: International Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.