DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Brand Equity and Price Towards Customer Purchase Decision in Low Cost Airlines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE IMPACT OF BRAND EQUITY AND PRICE TOWARDS CUSTOMER PURCHASE DECISION IN LOW COST AIRLINES (A CASE STUDY OF INDONESIA AIRASIA, JAKARTA – DENPASAR ROUTE) By Fazrul Rahman ID No. 014201200185 A skripsi presented to the Faculty of Business President University Inpartial fulfillment of the requirements for Bachelor Degree in Economics Majoring Management October 2016 PANEL OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL SHEET The panel of examiners declared that the skripsi entitled “THE IMPACT OF BRAND EQUITY AND PRICE TOWARDS COSTUMER PURCHASE DECISION IN LOW COST AIRLINES (A STUDY CASE OF INDONESIA AIRASIA, JAKARTA – DENPASAR ROUTE)” that was submitted by Fazrul Rahman majoring in Management from the Faculty of Business was assessed and approved to have passed the Oral Examinations on December 14, 2016. Miftah Zikri, M.Sc Chair – Panel of Examiners Dr. Ir. Yunita Ismail Masjud, M.Si Examiner 2 Filda Rahmiati, MBA Examiner 3 SKRIPSI ADVISER RECOMMENDATIONLETTER This skripsi entitled “THE IMPACT OF BRAND EQUITY AND PRICE TOWARD COSTUMER PURCHASE DECISION IN LOW COST AIRLINES (A STUDY CASE OF AIR ASIA INDONESIA IN JAKARTA – DENPASAR ROUTE)” prepared and submitted by Fazrul Rahman in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor in the Faculty of Business has been reviewed and found to have satisfied the requirements for a skripsi fit to be examined. I therefore recommend this skripsi for Oral Defense. Cikarang, Indonesia, December 14, 2016 Acknowledged by, Recommended by, Dr. Dra. Genoveva, M.M Miftah Zikri, M.Sc Head of Management Study Program Skripsi Adviser DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I declare that this skripsi, entitled “THE IMPACT OF BRAND EQUITY AND PRICE TOWARD COSTUMER PURCHASE DECISION IN LOW COST AIRLINES (A STUDY CASE OF INDONESIA AIRASIA, JAKARTA – DENPASAR ROUTE) is, to the best of my knowledge and beliefs, an original piece of work that has not been submitted, either in whole or in a part, to another university to obtain a degree. Cikarang, Indonesia, December 14, 2016 FazrulRahman ABSTRACT This research is aimed to analyze Brand Equity and Price toward Customer Purchase Decision that is measure through Brand Awareness, Brand Association, Perceived Quality, and Price with Customer Purchase Decision. Brand Equity and price can be referred to the result of branding strategy and promotion of implementation in Low Cost Airlines business operation for achieving a business growth. Methodology used in this research is quantitative approach with descriptive method by using primarily data and questionnaire is the research instrument. The sampling technique used is non-probability technique with accidental sampling method and the sample size is 200 respondents. Descriptive research and multiple regression analysis are adopted as tool for analysis in this research with significant level of 0.05. The result of research shows that Brand equity and Price has partially and simultaneously influence with Customer Purchase Decision and contribution of Brand Equity and Price toward Customer purchase Decision is shown by coefficient of determination value in which Brand Equity and Price has influence 71.3% on customer purchase decision, the rest 29.7 is influenced by other factor that are not included in this research such as Brand Loyalty and Promotion. Thus Brand Equity and Price result of Branding image implementation in low cost Airlines business operation has partially significant contribution to influence the Customer Purchase Decision of Customers in the market. Keyword: Low Cost Airlines, Brand Equity, Price, Purchase Decision, Branding strategy. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT “In The Name of ALLAH, The Most Gracious, The Most Merciful” Alhamulillahirabbilalamin, Praise and great gratitude submitted to almighty Allah SWT who always gives the writer gracious mercy and tremendous blessing that with the tears of happiness, the moment that I wait for a long time is finally come true. This is the moment that they have helped me to finishing this research entitled “The Impact of Brand Equity and Price Towards Customer Purchase Decision in Low Cost Airline (A Study Case of Indonesia AirAsia, Jakarta – Denpasar Route)”. This skripsi is arranged to fulfill the requirements for obtaining bachelor’s degree, in Management study program, Faculty of Business, President University. On this occasion with great humility, I would like to thank you to all of those who have given me help, contribution and guidance so that this skripsi can be finished. Completion of writing of this skripsi, the author would like to thank to: 1. Allah SWT with his blessing and merciful that allows me seeking precious knowledge up until higher level as well as has helped me to finish this skripsi. 2. My beloved parents Tetta and Mama for their love, as the best parents ever in this world and always pray, encouraging, giving material I needed, working hard, always trying to do the best, to support me and giving the happiness in my life, and always give me advices and motivation so I can finish my study. They are hero of my heart whom I will not regret in this life. 3. My brother and sister Annisa Fathir Rahman, Fazhluur Rahman, Sartika Fathir Rahman, Bagus Guntur Wibowo, and Mirna, thanks for your love and support and giving motivation for me during this skripsi and my study. 4. My Uncles, Aunties, and Cousins, thank you for helping, support and motivated me during my study. 5. My Thesis Adviser, Mr. Sonny Vinn Sutedjo, S.E., M.M as the greatest adviser that I know, thank you for your guidance, attention, patience and kindness during the process of writing and finishing this skripsi, Thanks for your good advice and valuable input. I’m so proud to have you as my skripsi adviser. 6. My Friendly lecturer, Mr. Orlando Santos MBA and Mrs. Genoveva, the person who always helps and inspires me gains knowledge in university life with simplest ways. Thanks for your guidance, care, time, and kindness; you are the best and friendliest lecturer ever. 7. Dearest my best Friends Asty Nur Utami, Septian Arya, Arham Rezkiawan, Muh. Erwin, Achmad Fauzan, Takalar Presuniv, Society Presuniv and Sliber TKL, thank you for your support during this skripsi and my study period, and thanks for being my family in last 4 years. 8. My fellow Jakarta Internship Team, Ilham Ridwani, Michael Tiopan, Zani Patria Akbar, Steven Boy, Christian Ebenheizer, Pradana Adlu, Miftahul Fikri, Dudi Afriyanaldi, Andra Martha, as the best friends for sharing the experiences from become Internship Employee until finishing my study. 9. Eldy, Fathur, Aidil, Jamal and the other Gaple team, thank you for your night life to playing Gaple during this skripsi, and your Acehnese accent that makes me always laughing. 10. Naga Hitam Riverside, thanks for being my family in my university life, thank you for your laughs, togetherness, and craziness. I hope our brotherhood will not give up until we are older. Keep in touch brader! 11. All of the lecturers who have given my precious insight, shaped critical mindset for me to be a sustainable leader in near future. All of you are indeed unique so that I can learn how to see a thing from different point of view. TABLE OF CONTENTS PANEL OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL SHEET ...................................................................................................... i DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY .................................................................................................................... ii SKRIPSI ADVISERRECOMMENDATION LETTER .............................................................................................. iii ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................................................v TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................... 8i LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. x CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background of the Study. ....................................................................... 1 1.2. Problem Identification. ........................................................................... 8 1.3. Statement of Problem. ............................................................................. 9 1.4. Research Objectives. ............................................................................... 9 1.5. Significance of Study. ............................................................................ 10 1.6. Scope and Limitation of the Study. ...................................................... 10 1.7. Definition of Terms. .............................................................................. 11 CHAPTER II – LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1. Theoretical Review. ............................................................................... 12 2.2. Influence of Independent variables on Dependent variables.
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
  • Publications 2019

    Publications 2019

    AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha ASEAN Aviation Integration Platform (AAIP) Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Air Power Centre of Indonesia Air and Space Law Studies, International Business Law Program Universitas Prasetiya Mulya Member of German Aviation Research Society The views expressed are those of the author. 2 AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1. The Liberalization Progress in Indonesia ................................................................................... 5 2. The State of Play ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. The Current Legal Regime and Its Limits .................................................................................. 9 4. Benefits from Relaxing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines ...................... 10 5. The Way Forward and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 12 Table 1: Domestic Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017 ........................................... 7 Table 2: International Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017
  • Dahulu�Dikenal�Sebagai�PT�AWAIR�Internasional)� Dibentuk� Pada� Bulan� September� 1999� Sebagai� Perusahaan� Swasta� Lokal� Di

    DahuluDikenalSebagaiPTAWAIRInternasional) Dibentuk Pada Bulan September 1999 Sebagai Perusahaan Swasta Lokal Di

    BAB III GAMBARAN UMUM PERUSAHAAN A. Gambaran Umum Indonesia AirAsia 1. Sejarah PT Indonesia AirAsia PT Indonesia AirAsia (dahuludikenal sebagai PT AWAIR Internasional) dibentuk pada bulan September 1999 sebagai perusahaan swasta lokal di Indonesia. Pada Maret 2000, PT AWAIR Internasional diambil alih oleh sekelompokinvestor swasta yangdikepalai olehUnn Harris danPinHarris yang kemudian secara penuh mengelola seluruh perusahaan. AWAIR mengadopsi model bisnis maskapai penerbangan dengan penuh dan beragam kelas dan pelayanan kabinyang lengkap. AWAIR memperoleh ijin bisnis penerbangan udara berjadwal pada Mei 2000, dua armada A310300 diantarkan ke AWAIR. AWAIR meluncurkan penerbanganperdananya dari Jakarta ke Surabaya, Medan, danBalikpapanpada Juni 2000. Pada Desember 2000, AWAIR menambah armada A310300 yang ketida dan membuka rute dari Jakarta ke Singapore, Denpasar dan Ujung Pandang. AWAIR secara bertahap menurunkankegiatanoperasinya pada awal 2001 karena ketatnya kompetisi di Indonesia dalam mengikuti kebijakan sektor penerbangan Indonesia. Pada pertengahan 2004, AA International Limited (AAIL) sebuahperusahaanyang 99.8% sahamnya dimiliki olehAirAsia Berhad menunjukkan ketertarikannya terhadap AWAIR dan memulai pembicaraan Analisis perbandingan pengaruh..., Siskanita, FISIP UI, 2008 47 dengan para pemegang saham AWAIR untuk mengambil alih 49% saham AWAIR. Pada 30 Agustus 2004, AAIL memasuki kerjasama penjualan dan pembayaranuntukpengambilalihansaham AWAIR. Danpada bulanSeptember 2004, AWAIR memperoleh ijin dari Badan Koordinasi Penanam
  • Shownews Is Published by Penton Media Inc., 9800 Metcalf Ave., Overland Park, KS 66212-2216

    Shownews Is Published by Penton Media Inc., 9800 Metcalf Ave., Overland Park, KS 66212-2216

    D A Y 3 AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY / AIR TRANSPORT WORLD / SPEEDNEWS February 18, 2016 Singapore Airshow Zetta managing director Geoffery Cassidy (left) and Bombardier Business Aircraft sales VP Peter Likoray toasted MRO is Changing in Asia the deal here yesterday. Lufthansa Technik says deeper pockets will be needed. PAGE 3 No Rolls-Pratt Link Up British maker had its chance, says new P&W president, Leduc. PAGE 10 Saab Enters ASW Market Swordfish anti-submarine system is based on Global 6000. PAGE 18 Buys Two Globals Yak Trainer Sports a Diesel New primary trainer for Russia Singapore-based Zetta Jet has exercised options on two Bombardier Global 6000 jets, and has taken options on an additional has a German engine. PAGE 20 pair, Bombardier said here yesterday. The 6000 “delivers the perfect combination of comfort, range and performance sought by the international traveling elite who make up our clientele,” said Zetta managing director Geoffery Cassidy. The two aircraft will be based at Zetta’s North American hub in Los Angeles. The firm order, including a first Global 6000 announced in December, is valued at approximately US$187 million, Bombardier says. If all options are exercised, the value could reach ST Aero Opens VIP Center US$436 million. Zetta was established this past August. Will furnish/refurbish VIP busi- ness jets in Singapore. PAGE 22 Airbus, Boeing, CFM Win Orders AVIAGE Works to be Global AVIC-GE JV proposes avionics for CFM topped the orders league yesterday The Okay order, which still must be approved new Chinese widebody. PAGE 27 with a US$4.9 billion contract placed by by the Chinese government, is valued at $1.3 Transportation Partners, the leasing arm of Lion billion at list prices and makes the Beijing- Opinion: Forex Wild Card Group, for 348 LEAP-1A engines to power 174 headquarted carrier the Chinese launch opera- previously-ordered Airbus A320neo airliners.
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb

    Global Volatility Steadies the Climb

    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
  • Preliminary Operating Statistics for the 4Th Quarter 2017 and Full Financial Year Ended 2017

    Preliminary Operating Statistics for the 4Th Quarter 2017 and Full Financial Year Ended 2017

    Preliminary Operating Statistics th For the 4 Quarter 2017 and Full Financial Year Ended 2017 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AirAsia Berhad is pleased to announce the operating statistics for the 4th Quarter of the 2017 Financial Year (“4Q17”) and the full financial year ended 31 December 2017. AirAsia Berhad Consolidated AOCs[1] delivered another outstanding set of operating statistics in the seasonally strong fourth quarter. Total passengers carried increased 17% year-on-year to 10.44 million passengers, in-line with the 16% increase in seat capacity. Load factor improved by 1 percentage point to 88% compared the same period in 2016. In the quarter under review, AirAsia Berhad Consolidated AOCs total fleet size grew to 116 aircraft, comprising of 84 in Malaysia (AirAsia Berhad), 15 in Indonesia (PT Indonesia AirAsia) and 17 operating in Philippines (Philippines AirAsia Inc). Malaysia commenced operations of five new routes originating from: Johor–2; Kuala Lumpur–1; Kuching–1; Singapore–1. Philippines commenced operations of two new routes both originating from Manila. Malaysia increased frequencies on 9 routes originating from: Kuala Lumpur–5; Kuching–2; Johor–1; Singapore–1. Indonesia managed to achieve the same full year load factor of 84% as FY2016 despite the volcanic activities of Mt. Agung, which disrupted tourist arrivals into Denpasar. Indonesia increased frequencies on three routes originating from: Bali–2; Jakarta–1. Philippines’ passengers carried increased by 32% year-on-year and maintained a full year high load factor of 87%. Philippines increased frequencies on two routes originating from Manila. Overall, 2017 was another record year for the group, carrying a total of 39.1 million passengers (+11% year-on-year) with a full year load factor of 88%, rising 1 percentage point from FY2016.
  • Offering Circular

    Offering Circular

    GARUDA INDONESIA GLOBAL SUKUK LIMITED (incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands) U.S.$500,000,000 Trust Certificates due 2020 Issue Price: 99.256 per cent. The U.S.$500,000,000 trust certificates due 2020 (the “Certificates”) of Garuda Indonesia Global Sukuk Limited (in its capacity as issuer and in its capacity as trustee, the “Trustee”) will be constituted by a declaration of trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) dated 3 June 2015 (the “Issue Date”) entered into between the Trustee, PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (the “Obligor”or“Garuda”) and The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited as the delegate of the Trustee (the “Delegate”). The Certificates confer on the holders of the Certificates from time to time (the “Certificateholders”) the right to receive certain payments (as more particularly described herein) arising from an undivided ownership interest in the assets of a trust declared by the Trustee pursuant to the Declaration of Trust (the “Trust”) over the Trust Assets (as defined herein) which will include, inter alia: (i) the Rights to Travel (as defined herein); and (ii) the Trustee’s rights under the Transaction Documents (as defined herein). Periodic Distribution Amounts (as defined herein) shall be payable subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Certificates (the “Conditions”) on the outstanding face amount of the Certificates from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) 3 June 2020 (the “Scheduled Dissolution Date”) at a rate of 5.95 per cent. per annum. Payments on the Certificates will be made free and clear of, and without deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by the Cayman Islands, the Republic of Indonesia or any authority therein or thereof having power to tax to the extent described under Condition 10 (Taxation).
  • Asia-Pacific Low-Cost Carriers Ranked by Fleet Size As of Dec

    Asia-Pacific Low-Cost Carriers Ranked by Fleet Size As of Dec

    Asia-Pacific Low-cost Carriers Ranked by Fleet Size as of Dec. 31, 2013 No. of Rank Carrier Country LCC Group Aircraft 1 JT Lion Air Indonesia Lion 94^^ 2 AK AirAsia Malaysia AirAsia 74 3 JQ Jetstar Airways Australia Jetstar 74 4 6E IndiGo India (independent) 73 5 SG SpiceJet India (independent) 56 6 5J Cebu Pacific Air Philippines (independent) 48 7 9C Spring Airlines China Spring* 39 8 FD Thai AirAsia Thailand AirAsia 35 9 BC Skymark Airlines Japan (independent) 33 10 QZ Indonesia AirAsia Indonesia AirAsia 30 11 IW Wings Air Indonesia Lion 27 12 TR Tigerair Singapore Tigerair 25 13 QG Citilink Indonesia (Garuda) 24 14 OX Orient Thai Airlines Thailand (independent) 22 15 DD Nok Air Thailand Nok* 21** 16 IX Air India Express India (Air India) 21 17 3K Jetstar Asia Vietnam Jetstar 19^ 18 D7 AirAsia X Malaysia AirAsia X* 18 19 GK Jetstar Japan Japan Jetstar 18 20 G8 GoAir India (independent) 17 21 8L Lucky Air China (Hainan Airlines) 17 22 7C Jeju Air South Korea (independent) 13 23 Z2 Zest Air Philippines AirAsia 13 24 S2 JetLite India (Jet Airways Airlines) 13 25 PN West Air China (Hainan Airlines) 13 26 HD Air Do Japan (independent) 13 27 TT Tigerair Australia Australia Tigerair 12 28 LQ Solaseed Japan (independent) 12 29 MM Peach Japan (All Nippon Airways) 11 30 BX Air Busan South Korea (Asiana Airlines) 11 31 7G Star Flyer Japan (independent) 11 32 VJ VietJet Air Vietnam VietJet* 10 33 OD Malindo Air Malaysia Lion 10 34 LJ Jin Air South Korea (Korean Air) 10 35 RI Tigerair Mandala Indonesia Tigerair 9 36 ZE Eastar Jet South Korea (independent)
  • TRANS DARAT 24Menerapkan Standar Keselamatan Bus Pariwisata SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA 36STPI Curug, Tangerang Garda Terdepan Pembentuk

    TRANS DARAT 24Menerapkan Standar Keselamatan Bus Pariwisata SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA 36STPI Curug, Tangerang Garda Terdepan Pembentuk

    editorial Merampungkan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pembaca Budiman, Majalah Kementerian Perhubungan Setiap proses pembangunan senantiasa tak lepas No.STT. No. 349 SK/Ditjen PPG/STT 1976 dari sejumlah tantangan. Pun dengan pembangunan ISSN : 0853179X S infrastruktur pelabuhan, terminal, jalur rel kereta PEMBINA: api, dan fasilitas transportasi lainnya di sub sektor Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, perhubungan darat, laut, udara serta kereta api. Sejumlah PENASEHAT: proyek pembangunan yang sudah selesai, memerlukan Sekretaris Jenderal Kementerian Perhubungan, penanganan lebih lanjut. Ini karena pembangunan Inspektur Jenderal Kementerian infrastruktur yang dihasilkan, kurang berjalan sesuai Perhubungan, Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat, harapan. Alasannya pun beragam. Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Laut, Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara, Direktur Jenderal Perkeretaapian, Salah satu contohnya, temuan Irjen Kemenhub atas Kepala Badan Pengembangan SDM proyek-proyek pelabuhan yang berstatus Konstruksi Perhubungan, Kepala Badan Litbang Perhubungan, Cover : Dalam Pengerjaan (KDP) di sejumlah daerah. Tantangan Kepala Badan Pengelola Transportasi Pelabuhan Penyeberangan Ceremai, penyelesaiannya membutuhkan keseriusan semua pihak Jabodetabek Kabupaten Sambas, Kalimantan Barat termasuk peran dari Pemerintah Daerah. Ini karena PENANGGUNG JAWAB: lokasi pelabuhan yang dibangun ada di wilayah mereka. Pengoperasian pelabuhan Baitul Ihwan membutuhkan akses jalan dan kejelasan status lahan. Tanpa adanya kepastian status PEMIMPIN REDAKSI: lahan
  • PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk

    PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk

    01 October 2012 Asia Pacific/Indonesia Equity Research Airlines (Air Transportation) / UNDERWEIGHT PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk (GIAA.JK / GIAA IJ) Rating OUTPERFORM* Price (27 Sep 12, Rp) 620.00 INITIATION Target price (IDR) 900.00¹ Upside/downside (%) 1,389,093.5 Mkt cap (Rp mn) 14,037,418 Capital drag priced in; this bird should fly (US$ 1,467) Enterprise value (US$ mn) 1,514 ■ Discounted valuation the key attraction. We initiate coverage of Garuda Number of shares (mn) 22,641.00 Free float (%) 28.0 Indonesia (GA) with an OUTPERFORM rating, believing that its discounted 52-week price range 770.0 - 395.0 stock price and organic top-line growth combined with management and ADTO - 6M (US$ mn) 1.6 equipment-led cost cuts provide adequate appeal and compensate for *Stock ratings are relative to the relevant country benchmark. ¹Target price is for 12 months. increasing competition and rising balance sheet leverage. Research Analysts ■ Operational goals well within reach despite competitive environment. Timothy Ross Robust market growth and a segmented product should allow GA to expand 65 6212 3337 its yield while holding loads steady, allowing earnings to rise ahead of [email protected] consensus for the next two years. We do anticipate a decline in FY14E Leonard Huo, CFA NPAT, however, as rising ownership costs more than offset improvement in 65 6212 3062 [email protected] underlying earnings. ■ Reclaiming lost ground. Re-fleeting will permit focus on the neglected domestic LCC business, the reclamation of GA’s natural long-haul revenue stream and the creation of a short-haul premium market.
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners

    Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners

    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
  • For the Original Article, Please Visit

    For the Original Article, Please Visit

    For the original article, please visit http://www.bharian.com.my/node/25892 SINGAPORE : Expressing sadness on the news again lost a commercial aircraft in the Asia- Pacific - Indonesia AirAsia aircraft QZ8501 - Wisner Law Firm described the incident as " a grave tragedy.” Floyd Wisner, principal of Wisner Law Firm, said, "Our firm represents families of passengers aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 (and MH17) and the possibility of losing another aircraft in the area is really disturbing." He hoped investigators would be able to detect the aircraft immediately and begin the process to determine the cause of his disappearance. "Since this is an international airline, AirAsia responsibilities will be subject to an international treaty, the Montreal Convention, which places the responsibility entirely to the airline, " he said in a statement here today . However, he said. Wisner Law Firm believes investigators will analyze carefully the possibility Airbus suffered mechanical problems. The law firm also represents more than 180 passengers and crew aboard a Qantas Airbus Flight 72 crashed overwritten when a flight from Singapore to Perth, Western Australia. Computer problems caused Airbus crashed. Wisner Law Firm also represents the families of passengers and crew aboard Air France Airbus that crashed in the Atlantic Ocean. " We want to stress that this crash, in part, be attributed to defects in the technology ' fly - by- wire ' Airbus, " Wisner said. Wisner Law Firm has many clients in this region and represents the families of victims of the crash of Garuda flight 152, 185 Silk Air, Garuda 200, 421 Garuda, Lion Air JT 904, 538 Lion Air JT, Adam Air KI 574 and Adam Air KI 292.