DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Investigation Report for the Cattlehead Cdv Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Investigation Report for the Cattlehead Cdv Site SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR THE CATTLEHEAD CDV SITE United States Forest Service, Southern Region Ozark St. Francis National Forest Contract No. AG-43ZP-D-15-0007 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service, Southern Region Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Prepared by: BMT Designers & Planners, Inc. 4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 1000 Alexandria, Virginia 22302 March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. GENERAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 3 3. SITE LOCATION AND PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................... 4 3.1. Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2. Topography ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3. Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.4. Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.5. Surface Water ............................................................................................................................... 6 4. DESKTOP DATA COLLECTION AND SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...................................................... 7 4.1. Site Description ............................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. Surrounding Property Description ................................................................................................. 7 4.2.1. Sensitive Receptor Survey .................................................................................................... 8 4.3. Historical Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................. 9 4.4. Operational History and Contaminants of Potential Concern ..................................................... 10 4.5. Previous Investigations ............................................................................................................... 11 4.6. Identification of Areas of Potential Concern ................................................................................ 11 5. ABBREVIATED PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT/FIELD SCREENING ............................................... 13 5.1. Vat Water and Vat Soil/Sludge Sampling ................................................................................... 13 5.2. Surface and Shallow Subsurface Soil Sample Collection and Analytical Results ...................... 14 5.2.1. XRF Analytical Results ........................................................................................................ 14 5.2.2. Verification of Screening Level Risk Assessment Results .................................................. 14 5.2.3. Fixed Laboratory Analytical Results .................................................................................... 15 5.2.4. Further Evaluation of the Soil to Groundwater Pathway ..................................................... 16 5.3. Groundwater and Subsurface Soil Sample Collection and Analytical Results ........................... 16 5.3.1. Subsurface Soil Sample Collection and Analytical Results ................................................ 17 5.3.2. Groundwater Sample Collection and Analytical Results ..................................................... 18 5.4. Surface Water and Sediment Sample Collection and Analysis .................................................. 18 5.5. Screening Level Risk Assessment Summary ............................................................................. 18 5.5.1. Field Screening Level Risk Assessment ............................................................................. 18 5.5.2. Fixed Laboratory Results Screening Level Risk Assessment ............................................ 18 CDVMP Site Investigation at the Cattle Head CDV, Ozark National Forest (Update) Page i Task Order No. AG-43ZP-D-15-0007 March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6. FOCUSED SITE INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................................... 20 7. FOLLOW-ON SOIL SAMPLING .......................................................................................................... 21 7.1. Follow-on Soil Sampling Activities and Results .......................................................................... 21 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ....................................................... 23 8.1. XRF Analysis Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples ........................................................ 23 8.2. XRF Data Comparability and Usability ........................................................................................ 25 8.3. Evaluation of XRF Interferences ................................................................................................. 26 8.4. Fixed Laboratory Analysis Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples .................................... 28 8.5. Data Validation ............................................................................................................................ 29 8.5.1. Field Data Validation ........................................................................................................... 29 8.5.2. Laboratory Data Validation .................................................................................................. 29 8.5.3. SVOC Resampling .............................................................................................................. 30 8.6. Deviations from the Sampling and Analysis Plan ....................................................................... 30 9. STREAMLINED RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 31 9.1. Human Health Risk Assessment ................................................................................................. 31 9.1.1. Data Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 32 9.1.1.1. Selection of Data for Use in the Risk Assessment .......................................................... 32 9.1.1.2. Selection of Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPCs) ............................................. 32 9.1.2. Exposure Assessment ........................................................................................................ 35 9.1.2.1. Exposure Scenarios ........................................................................................................ 35 9.1.2.2. Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) .......................................................................... 35 9.1.2.3. Calculation of Dermal and Ingestion Exposures to Toxaphene in Soils ......................... 35 9.1.3. Toxicity Assessment ........................................................................................................... 36 9.1.3.1. Non-Carcinogenic Contaminants .................................................................................... 36 9.1.3.2. Carcinogenic Contaminants ............................................................................................ 36 9.1.4. Human Health Risk Characterization .................................................................................. 36 9.1.4.1. Cancer Risks ................................................................................................................... 36 9.1.4.2. Non-Carcinogenic Risks .................................................................................................. 37 9.1.4.3. Radiological Risks ........................................................................................................... 37 9.1.4.4. Human Health Risk Summary ......................................................................................... 38 9.2. Ecological Risk Assessment ....................................................................................................... 38 9.2.1. Problem Formulation ........................................................................................................... 38 CDVMP Site Investigation at the Cattle Head CDV, Ozark National Forest (Update) Page ii Task Order No. AG-43ZP-D-15-0007 March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9.2.1.1. Selection of Ecological COPCs ....................................................................................... 39 9.2.1.2. Identification of Ecological Exposure Scenarios ............................................................. 39 9.2.2. Ecological Exposure ............................................................................................................ 39 9.2.3. Toxicity Assessment ........................................................................................................... 40 9.2.4. Ecological Risk Characterization ......................................................................................... 40 10. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ri Wkh% Lrorjlfdo (Iihfwv Ri 6Hohfwhg &Rqvwlwxhqwv
    Guidelines for Interpretation of the Biological Effects of Selected Constituents in Biota, Water, and Sediment November 1998 NIATIONAL RRIGATION WQATER UALITY P ROGRAM INFORMATION REPORT No. 3 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Geological Survey Bureau of Indian Affairs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ntroduction The guidelines, criteria, and other information in The Limitations of This Volume this volume were originally compiled for use by personnel conducting studies for the It is important to note five limitations on the Department of the Interior's National Irrigation material presented here: Water Quality Program (NIWQP). The purpose of these studies is to identify and address (1) Out of the hundreds of substances known irrigation-induced water quality and to affect wetlands and water bodies, this contamination problems associated with any of volume focuses on only nine constituents or the Department's water projects in the Western properties commonly identified during States. When NIWQP scientists submit NIWQP studies in the Western United samples of water, soil, sediment, eggs, or animal States—salinity, DDT, and the trace tissue for chemical analysis, they face a elements arsenic, boron, copper, mercury, challenge in determining the sig-nificance of the molybdenum, selenium, and zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbamate Pesticides Aldicarb Aldicarb Sulfoxide Aldicarb Sulfone
    Connecticut General Statutes Sec 19a-29a requires the Commissioner of Public Health to annually publish a list setting forth all analytes and matrices for which certification for testing is required. Connecticut ELCP Drinking Water Analytes Revised 05/31/2018 Microbiology Total Coliforms Fecal Coliforms/ E. Coli Carbamate Pesticides Legionella Aldicarb Cryptosporidium Aldicarb Sulfoxide Giardia Aldicarb Sulfone Carbaryl Physicals Carbofuran Turbidity 3-Hydroxycarbofuran pH Methomyl Conductivity Oxamyl (Vydate) Minerals Chlorinated Herbicides Alkalinity, as CaCO3 2,4-D Bromide Dalapon Chloride Dicamba Chlorine, free residual Dinoseb Chlorine, total residual Endothall Fluoride Picloram Hardness, Calcium as Pentachlorophenol CaCO3 Hardness, Total as CaCO3 Silica Chlorinated Pesticides/PCB's Sulfate Aldrin Chlordane (Technical) Nutrients Dieldrin Endrin Ammonia Heptachlor Nitrate Heptachlor Epoxide Nitrite Lindane (gamma-BHC) o-Phosphate Metolachlor Total Phosphorus Methoxychlor PCB's (individual aroclors) Note 1 PCB's (as decachlorobiphenyl) Note 1 Demands Toxaphene TOC Nitrogen-Phosphorus Compounds Alachlor Metals Atrazine Aluminum Butachlor Antimony Diquat Arsenic Glyphosate Barium Metribuzin Beryllium Paraquat Boron Propachlor Cadmium Simazine Calcium Chromium Copper SVOC's Iron Benzo(a)pyrene Lead bis-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Magnesium bis-(ethylhexyl)adipate Manganese Hexachlorobenzene Mercury Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Miscellaneous Organics Selenium Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Silver Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMICALS of PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN and Their Management in the African Region
    H H C Hg H N C OH O O HO OH OH CHEMICALS OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN and their management in the African Region REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 4 JULY 2014 AFRO LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Chemicals of public health concern in the African Region and their management: Regional Assessment Report 1. Chemically-Induced Disorders – prevention & control 2. Environmental Exposure 3. Polluants environnemental – adverse effects – toxicity 4. Hazardous Substances 5. Risk Management 6. Health Impact Assessment I. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Africa II.Title ISBN: 978-929023281-0 (NLM Classification:QZ 59) © WHO REGIONAL OFFICE FOR AFRICA, 2014 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy The mention of specific companies or of certain copyright protection in accordance with the provisions manufacturers’ products does not imply that they of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. are endorsed or recommended by the World Health All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be Organization in preference to others of a similar nature obtained from the Library, WHO Regional Office for that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, Africa, P.O. Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo (Tel: the names of proprietary products are distinguished by +47 241 39100; +242 06 5081114; Fax: +47 241 initial capital letters. 39501; E-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate this publication All reasonable precautions have been taken by the – whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution – World Health Organization to verify the information should be sent to the same address. contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • P-Listed Hazardous Wastes
    P-Listed Hazardous Wastes The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified a number of chemicals on the EPA “P-list” that present an especially acute hazard when disposed of as hazardous waste. Because of their acute hazards, there are more stringent requirements when disposing of these wastes: ►Container size: When collecting p-listed chemicals as waste, the volume of the hazardous waste container must not exceed one quart (approximately one liter). ►Empty containers: Empty containers that held p-listed chemicals must also be disposed of as hazardous waste. They are not allowed to be washed or re-used. ►Contaminated materials: Disposable materials that become contaminated with p-listed chemicals (e.g. gloves, weighing boats, etc.) must also be disposed of as hazardous waste. Non-disposable materials must be “triple-rinsed”, or rinsed three times to remove the contamination. This rinsate must be collected as hazardous waste. Materials contaminated with p-listed chemicals may not be washed or re-used until they have been triple-rinsed. Remember: - Label the waste as hazardous waste. Most common p-listed wastes Just like all other hazardous wastes, p-listed Chemical CAS number wastes must be labeled with the words Acrolein 107–02–8 “hazardous waste”, the complete chemical Allyl alcohol 107–18–6 name, and the associated hazard Arsenic compounds Varies characteristics (e.g., ignitable, corrosive, Inorganic cyanide Varies toxic, or reactive). salts Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 - Use disposable materials whenever Cyanogen and 460-19-5, 506-77-4 possible. Triple-rising non-disposable Cyanogen Chloride material generates a lot of waste, which can 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51–28–5 be difficult to dispose of safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy Of
    Preliminary Tests with Systemic Insecticides 1 George E. Gould, Purdue University A systemic insecticide is one that is absorbed by the plant and translocated in the sap so that parts of the plant other than those treated become toxic to sucking insects. This type of insecticidal action was demonstrated for selenium compounds by Gnadinger (1) and others as early as 1933. These compounds were never used extensively as quantities of the material dangerous to humans accumulated in sprayed plants or in plants grown in treated soils. Recently German chemists have developed a number of phosphorus compounds that show systemic action. In our tests three of these compounds have been tried in com- parison with three related phosphorus compounds for which no systemic action has been claimed. The development of these systemic and other phosphorus compounds have been based on the discoveries of the German chemist Schrader in 1942 (German patent 720,577). After World War II this information became available to the Allied Governments and soon numerous com- pounds were released for experimental purposes. At present three of the non-systemic compounds, parathion, hexaethyl tetraphosphate and tetraethyl pyrophosphate, are available commercially. The first of the systemics tested was C-1014, a formulation similar to Pestox 3 (octa- methylpyrophosphoramide) which has been used in England. The other two in our tests were Systox with its active ingredient belonging to a trialkyl thiophosphate group and Potasan, diethoxy thiophosphoric acid ester of 7-hydroxy-4-methyl coumarin. Two additional phosphorus com- pounds used in some tests included Metacide, a mixture containing 6.2% parathion and 24.5% of 0, O-dimethyl O-p-nitrophenyl thiophos- phate, and EPN 300, ethyl p-nitrophenyl thionobenzine phosphonate.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHEMISTRY of PESTICIDES Walter R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Food and Drug Administration Papers U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 6-23-1969 THE CHEMISTRY OF PESTICIDES Walter R. Benson Food and Drug Administration Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfda Part of the Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Commons, Health and Medical Administration Commons, Health Services Administration Commons, Pharmaceutical Preparations Commons, and the Pharmacy Administration, Policy and Regulation Commons Benson, Walter R., "THE CHEMISTRY OF PESTICIDES" (1969). Food and Drug Administration Papers. 12. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfda/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Food and Drug Administration Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Reproduced by the U. S. DEPARTME",T OF HEAL TI!, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Fc·od and Drug Admilri.stration THE CHEMISTRY OF PESTICIDES Walter R. Benson Pesticide Branch, Division of Food Chemistry, Bureau of Science Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D. C. Reprinted from ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Volume 160, Article 1, Pages 7-29 June 23, 1969 THE CHEMISTRY OF PESTICIDES WaIter R. Benson Pesticide.f Brallch, DivisiO/l of Food Chemistr}" Bureall of Science "-ood and Drug Administration! Washingtoll, D. C. INTRODUCTION This review is limited to the structures ana a few reactions of the pesticides­ mainly in~ecticides-that affect mammalian systems and that are the subject of papers by other authors in this monograph.
    [Show full text]
  • European Corn Borer Control with Granular Formulations of Endrin, Heptachlor, and Toxaphene Mahlon Lowell Fairchild Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1959 European corn borer control with granular formulations of endrin, heptachlor, and toxaphene Mahlon Lowell Fairchild Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Fairchild, Mahlon Lowell, "European corn borer control with granular formulations of endrin, heptachlor, and toxaphene " (1959). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2152. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2152 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EUROPEAN CORN BORER CONTROL WITH GRANULAR FORMULATIONS OF ENDRIN, HEPTACHLOR, AND TOXAPHENE by MaliIon Lowell Fairchild A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Entomology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. Heati of Major department Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State Col 1ege Ames, Iowa 1959 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION REVIEW OF LITERATURE METHODS AND PROCEDURE DISCUSSION AND RESULTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS LITERATURE CITED ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPENDIX ] INTRODUCTION The European corn borer (Pyrausta nubi la 1 is (libn. ) ) was first re­ ported in this country by VinaI (1917). He suggested that it might have been imported in broomcorn from Europe. Since then it has moved west­ ward and southward until now it covers a major part of the corn growing area in the United States and Canada and has become one of the major economic pests on corn.
    [Show full text]
  • Lindane in Forestry
    LINDANE IN FORESTRY ... a continuing controversy PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range Experiment Station FOREST SERVICE U. S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE P. 0. BOX 245, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94701 USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PSW- 14 11976 LINDANE IN FORESTRY...a continuing controversy Thomas W. Koerber, compiler CONTENTS Page Preface.. ............................. 1 Biological Characteristics of Lindane ................ 3 Thomas W. Koerber Lindane Residues in the Environment ................. 6 George T. Fewell Effectiveness of Lindane Against Bark Beetles and Wood Borers .... 11 Richard H. Smith Lindane: An Undesirable Approach to Bark Beetle Control ...... 16 Donald L. Dahlsten Lindane Registration Should Not Be Retained ............. 22 Lloyd E. Broune, Donald L. Dahlsten, Fred M. Stephen, and John M. Wenz Lindane: A Useful Approach to Bark Beetle Control ......... 25 Bruce H. Roettgering, Roy Blomstrom, Robert W. Gustafson, and John I?. Pierce Lindane Registration Should Be Retained ............... 27 Kenneth M. Swain Koerber, Thomas W., compiler. 1976. Lindane in forestry... a continuing controversy. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-14, 30 p., illus. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Berkeley, Calif. Use of the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide lindane to control bark beetles is controversial. Differences of opinion persist, even among knowledgeable entomologists, on whether use is justified in view of potentially harmful side effects. Effectiveness of lindane treatments, as employed in preventing tree mortality from bark beetles, is also in question. In seven papers, relevant information from many sources is reviewed by investigators who hold divergent views. The papers present data on the biological characteristics of lindane, its persistence in the environment and effects on both target and nontarget organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Hazardous Waste Listing
    Hazardous Waste Listings A User-Friendly Reference Document September 2012 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Hazardous Waste Identification Process .............................................................. 5 Lists of Hazardous Wastes .............................................................................................................. 5 Summary Chart ............................................................................................................................... 8 General Hazardous Waste Listing Resources ................................................................................. 9 § 261.11 Criteria for listing hazardous waste. .............................................................................. 11 Subpart D-List of Hazardous Wastes ............................................................................................ 12 § 261.31 Hazardous wastes from non-specific sources. ............................................................... 13 Spent solvent wastes (F001 – F005) ......................................................................................... 13 Wastes from electroplating and other metal finishing operations (F006 - F012, and F019) ... 18 Dioxin bearing wastes (F020 - F023, and F026 – F028) .......................................................... 22 Wastes from production of certain chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (F024
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Toxaphene
    TOXAPHENE 119 5. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL 5.1 PRODUCTION Toxaphene does not occur naturally (Canada Department of National Health and Welfare 1978; EPA 1976a; IARC 1979). It is a complex mixture of at least 670 chlorinated terpenes (Jansson and Wideqvist 1983). Technical toxaphene can be produced commercially by reacting chlorine gas with technical camphene in the presence of ultraviolet radiation and catalysts, yielding chlorinated camphene containing 67–69% chlorine by weight (EPA 1976a; Korte et al. 1979; Vetter and Scherer 1998). It has been available in various forms: a solid containing 100% technical toxaphene; a 90% solution in xylene or oil; a 40% wettable powder; 5–20 and 40% dusts; 10 and 20% granules; 4, 6, and 9% emulsifiable concentrates; 1% baits; a 2:1 toxaphene; DDT emulsion; and a 14% dust containing 7% DDT (IARC 1979; IUPAC 1979; Penumarthy et al. 1976). In 1982, EPA canceled the registrations of toxaphene for most uses as a pesticide or pesticide ingredient, except for certain uses under specific terms and conditions (EPA 1982a, 1993; USDA 1995). All registered uses were banned in 1990 (EPA 1990b), and existing stocks of the pesticide were not allowed to be sold or used in the United States after March 1, 1990 (USDA 1995). In 1976, toxaphene was produced primarily by Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Delaware (Penumarthy et al. 1976). Production by a total of three U.S. companies (Hercules Incorporated, Tenneco, and Vicksburg Chemical Co., a division of Vertac) during 1976 totaled 19 million kg, which was a 29% decline from the production level of 27 million kg in 1975 (IARC 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Evaluation of Parathion and Azinphosmethyl in Freshwater Model Ecosystems
    Y\v\&*io 6>\o C Toxicological evaluation of parathion and azinphosmethyl in freshwater model ecosystems NN08201.81B :R.J.Dorîland Toxicological evaluationo fparathio nan d azinphosmethyl infreshwate rmode l ecosystems Promotor: dr.J.H . Koeman,hoogleraa r ind e toxicologie. R.J. Dortland Toxicological evaluation of parathion and azinphosmethyl in freshwater model ecosystems Proefschrift terverkrijgin gva nd egraa dva n doctori nd elandbouwwetenschappen , op gezagva nd erecto rmagnificus , dr.H.C .va nde rPlas , hoogleraari nd eorganisch e scheikunde, inhe topenbaa rt everdedige n opvrijda g2 0jun i198 0 desnamiddag st evie ruu ri nd eaul a vand eLandbouwhogeschoo l teWageninge n Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen - 1980 Astract Dortland,R.J. ,1980 .Toxicologica l evaluationo fparathio nan dazinphosmethy li n freshwatermode l ecosystems.Agric .Res .Rep .(Versl .landbouwk .Onderz. )898 , ISBN9 022 0073 24 ,(viii )+ 112p. ,3 3figs ,4 2tables ,13 1refs ,appendices , Eng.an dDutc hsummaries . Also:Doctora l thesis,Wageningen . Astud ywa smad eo fth epossibl ehazard so f long-termexposur e offreshwate recosys ­ temst olo w (<1 m gm~3 )concentration s oforganophosphoru s insecticides.Range-fin ­ ding,acut ean dsub-acut e (3weeks )laborator y toxicity trialswer ecarrie d outwit h parathion,azinphosmethyl ,diazinon ,malathio nan dparathion-methyl .Th e rateso f dissipation ofthes ecompound s from thewate r phaseo faquari awit han dwithou tplant s andsediment swer estudied .Th emai ntes tspecie swer eDaphni amagna ,Asellu
    [Show full text]