DOCSLIB.ORG

Romania's Legion of the Archangel Michael (1922-1938)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Romania's Legion of the Archangel Michael (1922-1938) EUROPEAN FASCISTS AND LOCAL ACTIVISTS: ROMANIA’S LEGION OF THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL (1922-1938) by Roland Clark BA (Hons), University of Sydney, 2002 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Roland Clark It was defended on February 27, 2012 and approved by William Chase, Professor, Department of History, University of Pittsburgh Árpád von Klimó, DAAD Visiting Professor, Department of History, University of Pittsburgh John Markoff, Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh Lara Putnam, Associate Professor, Department of History, University of Pittsburgh Dissertation Advisor: Irina Livezeanu, Associate Professor, Department of History, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright © by Roland Clark 2012 iii EUROPEAN FASCISTS AND LOCAL ACTIVISTS: ROMANIA’S LEGION OF THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL (1922-1938) Roland Clark, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 In interwar Europe, “fascism” referred to a diffuse collection of independent movements and regimes that used similar symbols, gestures, and activities to pioneer a distinctive style of politics. The Legion of the Archangel Michael, also known as the Iron Guard, was one of the largest fascist social movements in interwar Europe. This dissertation examines how rank and file Legionaries experienced and articulated their political affiliations as members of the Legion, and more broadly as part of a global fascist network. Official repression, fascist aesthetics, and the demands of Legionary activism meant that becoming a Legionary involved far more than giving intellectual assent to a clearly articulated set of ideas. It changed activists’ everyday activities and life trajectories in profound ways. From the late nineteenth century onwards, Romanian ultra-nationalists organized to eliminate Jews, Freemasons, Communists, and political corruption from their society. Anti- Semitic violence increased in the universities in 1922, and extremist students engaged in mob violence, vandalism, and assassination. Ultra-nationalist activists built connections with racists abroad, but they based their movement on ways of thinking about Jews and Romanians that derived from nineteenth century nationalism. In 1927 Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and a small group followers split with other ultra-nationalists to form the Legion of the Archangel Michael. Legionaries gradually took over the anti-Semitic student movement by using a combination of iv violence, terrorism, and pious rhetoric. Elections were usually violent affairs for Legionaries, who flouted the law but also ran work camps, restaurants, and businesses. Legionaries described the Legion as a school for creating “new men” who would bring about national rebirth. Creating “new men” meant belonging to a hierarchical organization that expected total obedience from its members. Legionaries committed time, money and energy to expanding their movement and risked imprisonment and even death in return. They spoke about continuing the national struggle of their ancestors, but used uniforms, gestures, and symbols that identified them as part of a Europe-wide fascist current. v TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................ i ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... xv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 1.1 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................10 1.2 A NOTE ON SOURCES ............................................................................... 14 1.3 HISTORIANS AND THE FASCISTS ......................................................... 17 1.4 CHANGE OVER TIME................................................................................. 29 1.5 LEGIONARIES IN A FASCIST EUROPE ................................................. 32 PART I – ORIGINS 2.0 FOREIGNERS, NATIONALISTS, AND POLITICIANS ............................... 36 2.1 FOREIGNERS AND JEWS .......................................................................... 39 2.2 NATIONALIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS ....................................... 56 2.3 POLITICIANS AND TRAITORS ................................................................ 61 3.0 ORGANIZING ULTRA-NATIONALISTS ...................................................... 70 3.1 EARLY ANTI-SEMITIC ORGANIZING .................................................. 73 3.2 ULTRA-NATIONALISTS AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR ............ 77 vi 3.3 THE NATIONALIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY (1910-1916) ................... 80 3.4 THE GUARD OF THE NATIONAL CONSCIENCE (1919-1920) .......... 84 3.5 THE NATIONAL ROMANIAN FASCISTS (1922-1925) ......................... 90 3.6 ROMANIAN ACTION (1924-1925) ............................................................ 94 3.7 THE NATIONAL CHRISTIAN UNION (1922-1923) AND THE NATIONAL CHRISTIAN DEFENSE LEAGUE (1923-1935) ........................ 96 4.0 THE ANTI-SEMITIC STUDENT MOVEMENT .................................................. 105 4.1 VIOLENCE AND HOOLIGANISM ........................................................... 112 4.2 STUDENT SOCIETIES ................................................................................ 123 4.3 STUDENT CONGRESSES ........................................................................... 131 5.0 SUPPORTING THE MOVEMENT ........................................................................ 139 5.1 YOUTHFUL HEROISM AND THE PLOT OF THE VĂCĂREŞTENI... 140 5.2 ULTRA-NATIONALIST JUSTICE .............................................................149 5.3 WEDDINGS AND BAPTISMS .................................................................... 162 5.4 TRIALS, VIOLENCE, AND POLITICS .................................................... 170 PART II – GROWTH 6.0 SCHISM ......................................................................................................................180 6.1 A NEW FAITH .............................................................................................. 182 6.2 CĂMINUL CULTURAL CREŞTIN ........................................................... 187 6.3 WINNING OVER THE STUDENT MOVEMENT ................................... 193 vii 7.0 THE LEGION IN THE VILLAGE ......................................................................... 207 7.1 MOUNTED PROPAGANDA TOURS ........................................................ 210 7.2 RURAL PROPAGANDISTS ........................................................................ 214 7.3 MUSIC AND DANCE ................................................................................... 220 8.0 WORKERS, TRADESMEN, AND SOLDIERS ..................................................... 225 8.1 THE GREAT DEPRESSION ....................................................................... 227 8.2 RACISM AND THE VALUE OF LABOR ................................................. 231 8.3 LEGIONARY DEMOGRAPHICS .............................................................. 236 8.4 TRADESMEN AND WORKERS IN THE MID-1930s.............................. 242 8.5 SOLDIERS AND GENDARMES ................................................................ 248 9.0 PRINTED PROPAGANDA ...................................................................................... 254 9.1 POLITICAL BROADSHEETS .................................................................... 254 9.2 BUCHAREST INTELLECTUALS ............................................................. 263 9.3 NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, AND JOURNALS .................................. 267 9.4 BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, POSTERS, AND POSTCARDS ........................ 276 9.5 SYMPATHETIC NEWSPAPERS ............................................................... 286 10.0 ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE.................................................. 296 10.1 FIGHTING THE AUTHORITIES ............................................................. 301 10.2 ASSASSINATION AND PRISON .............................................................. 307 10.3 PROMOTING THE LEGION IN DOBRUJA .......................................... 311 viii 10.4 ULTRA-NATIONALIST FACTIONALISM ........................................... 316 10.5 DEATH THREATS AND INTIMIDATION ............................................ 319 11.0 PEACEFUL PROPAGANDA ................................................................................ 327 11.1 WORK CAMPS ........................................................................................... 330 11.2 LEGIONARY BUSINESSES ..................................................................... 343 11.3 ELECTORAL SUCCESS ........................................................................... 346 11.4 ROYAL DICTATORSHIP ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trials of the War Criminals
    TRIALS OF THE WAR CRIMINALS General Considerations The Fascist regime that ruled Romania between September 14, 1940, and August 23, 1944, was brought to justice in Bucharest in May 1946, and after a short trial, its principal leaders—Ion and Mihai Antonescu and two of their closest assistants—were executed, while others were sentenced to life imprisonment or long terms of detention. At that time, the trial’s verdicts seemed inevitable, as they indeed do today, derived inexorably from the defendants’ decisions and actions. The People’s Tribunals functioned for a short time only. They were disbanded on June 28, 1946,1 although some of the sentences were not pronounced until sometime later. Some 2,700 cases of suspected war criminals were examined by a commission formed of “public prosecutors,”2 but only in about half of the examined cases did the commission find sufficient evidence to prosecute, and only 668 were sentenced, many in absentia.3 There were two tribunals, one in Bucharest and one in Cluj. It is worth mentioning that the Bucharest tribunal sentenced only 187 people.4 The rest were sentenced by the tribunal in Cluj. One must also note that, in general, harsher sentences were pronounced by the Cluj tribunal (set up on June 22, 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă, “Introducere” in Procesul maresalului Antonescu (Bucharest: Saeculum and Europa Nova, 1995-98), vol. 1: p. 33. 2 The public prosecutors were named by communist Minister of Justice Lucret iu Pătrăşcanu and most, if not all of them were loyal party members, some of whom were also Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • National Council on the Humanities Minutes, No. 11-15
    Office of th8 General Counsel N ational Foundation on the Aria and the Humanities MINUTES OF THE ELEVENTH MEETING OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON THE HUMANITIES Held Monday and Tuesday, February 17-18, 1969 U. S. Department of State Washington, D. C. Members present; Barnaby C. Keeney, Chairman Henry Haskell Jacob Avshalomov Mathilde Krim Edmund F. Ball Henry Allen Moe Robert T. Bower James Wm. Morgan *Germaine Br&e Ieoh Ming Pei Gerald F. Else Emmette W. Redford Emily Genauer Robert Ward Allan A. Glatthorn Alfred Wilhelmi Members absent: Kenneth B. Clark Charles E. Odegaard John M. Ehle Walter J. Ong Paul G. Horgan Eugene B. Power Albert William Levi John P. Roche Soia Mentschikoff Stephen J. Wright James Cuff O'Brien *Present Monday only - 2 - Guests present: *Mr. Harold Arberg, director, Arts and Humanities Program, U. S. Office of Education Dr. William Emerson, assistant to the president, Hollins College, Virginia Staff members present; Dr. James H. Blessing, director, Division of Fellowships and Stipends, and acting director, Division of Research and Publication, National Endowment for the Humanities Dr. S. Sydney Bradford, program officer, Division of Research and Publication, NEH Miss Kathleen Brady, director, Office of Grants, NEH Mr. C. Jack Conyers, director, Office of Planning and Analysis, NEH Mr. Wallace B. Edgerton, deputy chairman, NEH Mr. Gerald George, special assistant to the chairman, NEH Dr. Richard Hedrich, Director of Public Programs, NEH Dr. Herbert McArthur, Director of Education Programs, NEH Miss Nancy McCall, research assistant, Office of Planning and Analysis, NEH Mr. Richard McCarthy, assistant to the director, Office of Planning and Analysis, NEH Miss Laura Olson, Public Information Officer, NEH Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gîndirea”. Nationalism and Orthodoxism in Interwar Romania (I)
    ETHNICITY AND DENOMINATION – ORTHODOXISM AND CATHOLICISM NICHIFOR CRAINIC AND “GÎNDIREA”. NATIONALISM AND ORTHODOXISM IN INTERWAR ROMANIA (I) IONUŢ BILIUŢĂ 1. Prolegomena After 1918, the struggle to define the Romanian ethnicity became bitterer than ever. A strong two-folded debate developed between the Westernizers and the traditionalists. People like Nichifor Crainic from “Gîndirea” started to publish extensively on the relation between Romanian culture, the Romanian specificity, the village and Orthodoxy to shape a traditionalist view regarding the character of a future Romanian culture. Continuing the 19th century project of the Junimists emphasizing an organic culture starting from the village, Nichifor Crainic framed a new nationalist project and that project was the birth of the Romanian culture in the category of Orthodox spirituality. The aim of this article is to lay out the way in which Orthodoxy is present in the nationalist discourse of Nichifor Crainic. I will point out that Orthodoxy played a major role in Nichifor Crainic’s conception of nationalism providing a spiritual background for any definition of the Romanian nation. Another aim is to determine that the Romanian traditionalist camp, represented by Nichifor Crainic, did not have a unitary discourse about the relation between Romanianness and Orthodoxy. The fact that Nichifor Crainic’s speech about the relation between Orthodoxy, the village and the nation changed dramatically during the interwar period is a proof that behind Nichifor Crainic’s nationalist Orthodoxism there were strong political sympathies. As Moeller van den Bruck in Germany1, Crainic began his political career from a neutral position, that of an intellectual uninterested in the political torments of his age, and he ended up as one of the first ideologues of the Romanian Fascist yoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Crisis
    Page 7 Chapter 2 Munich: Anatomy of A Crisis eptember 28, 1938, “Black Wednesday,” dawned on a frightened Europe. Since the spring Adolf Hitler had spoken often about the Sudetenland, the western part of Czechoslovakia. Many of the 3 Smillion German-speaking people who lived there had complained that they were being badly mistreated by the Czechs and Slovaks. Cooperating closely with Sudeten Nazis, Hitler at first simply demanded that the Czechs give the German-speakers within their borders self-government. Then, he upped the ante. If the Czechs did not hand the Sudetenland to him by October 1, 1938, he would order his well-armed and trained soldiers to attack Czechoslovakia, destroy its army, and seize the Sudetenland. The Strategic Location of the Sudetenland Germany’s demand quickly reverberated throughout the European continent. Many countries, tied down by various commitments and alliances, pondered whether—and how—to respond to Hitler’s latest threat. France had signed a treaty to defend the Czechs and Britain had a treaty with France; the USSR had promised to defend Czechoslovakia against a German attack. Britain, in particular, found itself in an awkward position. To back the French and their Czech allies would almost guarantee the outbreak of an unpredictable and potentially ruinous continental war; yet to refrain from confronting Hitler over the Sudetenland would mean victory for the Germans. In an effort to avert the frightening possibilities, a group of European leaders converged at Munich Background to the Crisis The clash between Germany and Czechoslovakia over the Sudetenland had its origins in the Versailles Treaty of 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • ANUL III No. 11 a APĂRUT: a APĂRUT IONEL TEODOREANU ULIŢA COPILĂRIEI UN VOLUM Is4 PAGINI CARTONAT 30 LEI EDITURA CVLTVRA NAŢIONALĂ
    ANUL III No. 11 A APĂRUT: A APĂRUT IONEL TEODOREANU ULIŢA COPILĂRIEI UN VOLUM iS4 PAGINI CARTONAT 30 LEI EDITURA CVLTVRA NAŢIONALĂ A APĂRUT: A APĂRUT: ION PILLAT PE ARGEŞ IN SUS UN VOLUM 118 PAGINI CARTONAT 33 LEI EDITURA CVLTVRA NAŢIONALĂ RIVISTA MENSILE DELTA RIVISTA MENSILE Redattori : Arturo Marpicati, Bruno Neri e Antonio Widmar Redazione e Amministrazione : Via Giosuè Carducci 11, Fiume Abonamento per l'estero : Un anno Lire 25.— GÂNDIREA STATUL CA ÎNDREPTAR DE TUDOR VIANU DUPĂ terminarea răsboiului european şi socotind drept soluţionate prin unirea pro­ vinciilor, împroprietărirea ţăranilor şi votul universal, suma problemelor care alimentase literatura română din ultimele două sau trei decenii, d-1 G. Ibrăileanu o decreta anulată în motivele ei: «întregirea neamului şi desrobirea ţărănimii, scrie d-sa., vor face să dispară din literatură acele accente de protestare, de revendicări, acel caracter de propagandă, care dădeau tonul unei părţi din operele noastre cele mai preţuite». Şi în altă parte: «Avem cre­ dinţa că cele două mari acte... care au înlăturat toate abstacolele desvoltării normale şi de­ pline ale întregului neam şi a tuturor forţelor lui vor da şi literaturii noastre, ca şi celorlalte manifestări ale energiei româneşti, un avânt nebănuit, care ne va aşeza definitiv în rândul popoarelor producătoare de cultură universală». (După Răsboiu, pg. io şi n). Literatura adusese contribuţia ei la rezolvirea marilor probleme ale naţiunei. Aceste probleme se gă­ seau acum soluţionate; producţiunii din ultimele decenii i se închidea orice viitor. Având de aci înainte să se adapteze condiţiunilor unui Stat în care elementul românesc primează printre minorităţi orgolioase de tradiţiunea lor şi în care importanţei noui îi corespund res­ ponsabilităţi incalculabile, scrisului romanesc în Statul românesc i se puneau alte probleme.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTANTIN ARGETOIANU GLIMPSES on HIS LIFE Elena
    CONSTANTIN ARGETOIANU GLIMPSES ON HIS LIFE Elena-Mirela Ciuchea Rezumat: Autoarea – pornind de la cercetarea unor informaţii inedite din arhivele craiovene ale familiei Argetoianu, de la memoriile omului politic şi de la ceea ce s-a scris până la această dată – reconstituie principalele momente şi componente ale formării şi afirmării lui Constantin Argetoianu. Anii de studiu, mediul familial, prietenii, aptitudinile, posibilităţile şi disponibilităţile intelectuale, trăsăturile de caracter, interesul pentru studiu şi pasiunea pentru limbile străine, intrarea şi afirmarea în viaţa politică, contextul mai larg al epocii interbelice etc. sunt câteva din aspectele semnificative, decisive ale vieţii, activităţii şi personalităţii sale, pe care le rezumă acest articol. The interwar period in Romania had its political men presented either as “martyrs” of the nation or like some common thieves, forgetting that when it comes to Mother Nature, only few things keep their white or black nuance, everything maintaining rich varied grey nuances … because otherwise the world would be bored, isn’t it? Maniu hasn’t been too nice. Why? His Jesuit face made many people stay aside…still the same “sobriety” didn’t prevent him from washing his hands in a Pillatian way from things on which his whole life philosophy was based on. A lot more likable, but extremely controversial was Constantin Argetoianu, the chameleon of the interwar Romanian politics, the man that managed to show how easy it was to pass from bitter hatred to friendship and admiration, all depending on the interest. This Oltenian boyar, loved and admired by many, hated and sworn by more, tried with the use of some delicious “Memories” to exculpate him in front of history and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutul De Istorie „A
    Academia Română – Filiala Iași Institutul de Istorie „A. D. Xenopol“ E-mail [email protected] Mihalache, Emanuel Andi, - PhD since 2001, senior research fellow ”A.D. Xenopol” History Institute of the Romanian Academy, Iași LIST OF WORKS a) Doctoral thesis: Discurs istoric şi ideologie în România «democraţiei populare», 1948-1965 [Historical Discourse and Ideology in “Popular Democrat” Romania, 1948-1965]. Scientific supervisor Academician Alexandru Zub, Iaşi, “Al.I. Cuza” University, July 2001. b) I. Single author books: 1. Istorie şi practici discursive în România „democrat-populară” [History and Discourse Practices in “Popular Democrat” Romania], Bucureşti, Ed.Albatros, 2003, 306p. ( the Award of the Romanian Academy, 2005); 2. Pe urmele lui Marx. Studii despre comunism şi consecinţele sale [Following in Marx’s Footsteps. Studies on Communism and Its Consequences], Iaşi , Editura Alfa, 2005, 240 p; 3. Mănuşi albe, mănuşi negre. Cultul eroilor în vremea dinastiei Hohenzollern [White Gloves, Black Gloves. The Cult of the Heroes during the Hohenzollern Dynasty], Cluj-Napoca, Editura Limes, 2007, 304p. 4. Contribuții la istoria ideii de patrimoniu. Surse, evoluții, interpretări [Contributions to the History of Heritage Idea. Sources, Evolutions, Interpretations], Iași, Editura Universității ”Al.I.Cuza”, 2014, 406p. II. Edited works: 1. edited collections: 1.1 In medias res. Studii de istorie culturală [In Medias Res. Studies of Cultural History], Iaşi, Editura Universităţii “Al.I.Cuza”, 2007, 600p. (co-editor: Adrian Cioflâncă); 1.2. Romantism şi modernitate. Atitudini, reevaluări, polemici [Romanticism and Modernity. Attitudes, Reconsiderations, Polemics], Iaşi, Editura Universităţii “Al.I.Cuza”, 2009, 664p. (co-editor: Alexandru Istrate) 2 1.3 De la fictiv la real.
    [Show full text]
  • Halele Carol, Bucharest Observatory Case
    8. Halele Carol (Bucharest, Romania) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766 Space for Logos H2020 PROJECT Grant Agreement No 776766 Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re- Project Full Title use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment Project Acronym OpenHeritage Grant Agreement No. 776766 Coordinator Metropolitan Research Institute (MRI) Project duration June 2018 – May 2021 (48 months) Project website www.openheritage.eu Work Package No. 2 Deliverable D2.2 Individual report on the Observatory Cases Delivery Date 30.11.2019 Author(s) Alina, Tomescu (Eurodite) Joep, de Roo; Meta, van Drunen; Cristiana, Stoian; Contributor(s) (Eurodite); Constantin, Goagea (Zeppelin); Reviewer(s) (if applicable) Public (PU) X Dissemination level: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (CO) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project OpenHeritage – Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766. The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Deliverable
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetry, a Christian Resistance Support in Romanian Prisons
    The poetry, a christian resistance support in Romanian prisons Ana NECHITA Abstract: Documents of special importance for their content, giving the voice of a tumultuous and broken destiny, which marked the young generation of the 1960’s, the poems of communist prisons are a significant sound of experiences had in suffering by those who wrote them. Pages written with blood, these poems by their testimonial value, require from us not to ignore their long sacrificial experience, using the freedom, stolen to these authors, for the rebuilding of the nation and the reconstruction of historical truth. The prison poetry, being between the fighting weapons of spiritual resistance, is located near the divine, tending to transfiguration, thing which is happening not few times. Thus, poetry of the prisons becomes a direct way of communicating of the one behind the bars with God. Endowed with the talent of rhyme and having the conscience of fight for truth, for a Romanian creed, these „angels of pain”, as they were called poets of communist prisons in Romania, assured their spiritual survival by sacrificing the best of them on the country altar, replacing the moments of indignation with life in spirit, and here pain is receiving a salvation sense. The lyrics of the imprisoned poets, springing out from pain and completed through pain, formed bright candles from the overflowing of their hearts for all those which was facing the same situation. In the shadow of the cell, under the lightless Professor of Romanian language and literature at “Ion Holban” Technical College, Iaşi. Romania Ana NECHITA vault of the lead mines, along with prayer, the poetry was a saving word, a flasher that lightened and assuaged in the darkness.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicolae Iorga
    Ediţie îngrijită, introducere şi note de Andrei Pippidi Redactor: Marieva Ionescu Coperta: Ioana Nedelcu Tehnoredactor: Manuela Măxineanu DTP: Andreea Dobreci, Dan Dulgheru Tipărit la Monitorul Oficial R.A. © HUMANITAS, 2019 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Iorga, Nicolae Jurnalul ultimilor ani: 1938–1940. Inedit / N. Iorga; ed. îngrij., introd. şi note de Andrei Pippidi. – Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2019 ISBN 978‑973‑50‑6422‑8 I. Pippidi, Andrei (ed., pref., note) 821.135.1 94 EDITURA HUMANITAS Piaţa Presei Libere 1, 013701 Bucureşti, România tel. 021/408 83 50, fax 021/408 83 51 www.humanitas.ro Comenzi online: www.libhumanitas.ro Comenzi prin e‑mail: [email protected] Comenzi telefonice: 021/311 23 30 transcrieri fonetice şi norme practice pentru lectura jurnalului Grafia lui N. Iorga este cunoscută din textele publicate în tim‑ pul vieţii sale, în general sub supravegherea sa. Ulterior, în numeroase cazuri, s‑a procedat la adaptarea după ortografia oficială modernă. Mi s‑a părut necesară respectarea întocmai a manuscrisului, tipărit aici pentru prima oară, cu particulari‑ tăţi care ţin de perioada istorică în care s‑a format grafia auto‑ rului, deci anii din jurul lui 1890, după cum se poate constata şi în autografe ale sale care nu erau destinate tiparului (scrisori personale, de familie). Aşadar persistă până la sfârşitul vieţii unele forme dialectale moldoveneşti (mâni sau mâne = mâine, amiezi = amiază) sau o pronunţie păstrată din secolul al XIX‑lea, ca diferenţa la pronumele relativ între sg. care şi pl. cari, supt = sub, aceia = aceea, ceia ce = ceea ce, aceiaşi = aceeaşi. Din aceeași epocă datează numele lunilor anului: decembre, novem‑ bre, octombre, septembre, sau mart, april.
    [Show full text]
  • Planul Integrat De Dezvoltare Urbana (Pidu)
    Bucharest Central Area Integrated Urban Development Plan 1. Recovering the urban identity for the Central area. Today, for many inhabitants, the historic center means only the Lipscani area, which is a simplification of history. We are trying to revitalize and reconnect the different areas which constitute the center of Bucharest, from Victory Square to Carol Park, having the quality of urban life for city residents as a priority and trying to create a city brand for tourists and investors. 2. Recovering the central area located south of the Dambovita river. Almost a quarter of surveyed Bucharest residents had not heard of areas like Antim or Uranus, a result of the brutal urban interventions of the 1980s when, after intense demolitions, fragments of the old town have become enclaves hidden behind the high- rise communist buildings. Bridges over Dambovita disappeared, and whole areas south of the river are now lifeless. We want to reconnect the torn urban tissue and redefine the area located south of Dambovita. recover this part of town by building pedestrian bridges over the river and reconstituting the old ways of Rahovei and Uranus streets as a pedestrian and bicycle priority route. 3. Model of sustainable alternative transportation. Traffic is a major problem for the Bucharest city center. The center should not be a transit area through Bucharest and by encouraging the development of rings and the outside belt, car traffic in the downtown area can easily decrease. We should prioritize alternative forms of transportation - for decades used on a regular basis by most European cities: improve transportation connections and establish a network of streets with priority for cyclists and pedestrians to cross the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 ARGEȘ VALEA MARE PRAVĂŢ ȘCOALA GIMNAZIALĂ NR
    Localitatea unității de Iniț.tatăl Județ Unitate de învățământ Numele solicitantului Loc. de domiciliu Localitatea superioară Nume elev Prenume elev învățământ ui ALBA BAIA DE ARIEŞ LICEUL 'DR. LAZAR CHIRILA' BAIA DE ARIES / AB Bedelean S Silvia Letitia BAIA DE ARIEŞ ORAŞ BAIA DE ARIEŞ Bedelean M Alex-Andrei ALBA BAIA DE ARIEŞ LICEUL 'DR. LAZAR CHIRILA' BAIA DE ARIES / AB Magurean A Dorin Alexandru BAIA DE ARIEŞ ORAŞ BAIA DE ARIEŞ Magurean D Alexandru Emanuel ALBA ARIEŞENI LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC DE TURISM SI ALIMENTATIE ARIESENI / AB Bate T Viorel COBLEŞ ARIEŞENI Bate V Daria Gabriela ALBA ARIEŞENI LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC DE TURISM SI ALIMENTATIE ARIESENI / AB Prata I Florentina NUCET ARIEŞENI Suciu Sebastian Ioan ALBA JIDVEI LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC JIDVEI / AB Moldovan C Elena-Sonita-Tabeia VESEUŞ JIDVEI Moldovan I Tabeia-Gabriela-Maria ALBA JIDVEI LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC JIDVEI / AB Rat D Madalina-Gabriela VESEUŞ JIDVEI Singerean G Gheorghe-Alessio ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Pătruşel D Nicoleta ALBAC ALBAC Pătruşel C Adelina ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Petrea C Silvia ALBAC ALBAC Petrea C Andreea-Maria ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Petrea N Marcel-Nicolae ALBAC ALBAC Petrea M Gavril-Mădălin ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Pleşa N Nicolae ALBAC ALBAC Pleşa N Maria ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Pleşa V Ioan ALBAC ALBAC Pleşa I Anamaria ALBA ALBAC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'TARA MOTILOR' ALBAC / AB Todea I Gheorghe ALBAC ALBAC Todea G Andreea
    [Show full text]