DOCSLIB.ORG

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY - Revised

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY - Revised FUND FOR NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ROADS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Final Construction of Corridor X, Highway E – 75, Section Demir Kapija – Smokvica ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY - Revised Skopje, March 2008 Foreword to the revised study (March, 2008) The original EIA study of the section Demir Kapija - Smokvica of the highway E-75 (Corridor X) was prepared in April 2007. It was based upon comparison of two alternatives, named Alternative A and Alternative B. The final recommendation of that EIA study was inconclusive since both alternatives had very negative impacts on the natural environment (in the case of Alternative B) or human environment and higher construction costs (Alternative A). As a result of the process of revision of the EIA study a new proposal was elaborated for Alternative B in order to overcome the most negative impacts of this alternative. The original route of Alternative B was passing through the right side of Demir Kapija canyon and over the Bela Voda cave. The new proposal contains solution that avoids the right side of the narrowest part of the Demir Kapija canyon and completely avoids Bela Voda cave. The new design of Alternative B overlaps with Alternative A from the beginning point and all the way to the exit of the tunnel in the left side of Demir Kapija canyon. After this point, routs of Alternative A and Alternative B split. The route of new Alternative B crosses Vardar river (newly proposed bridge) and joints the old route of Alternative B at point 2 km +100, The analysis of impacts of Alternative B in this revised study is based only on the new alignment of Alternative B and already analyzed Alternative A. Hence, the term Alternative B in this study refers to the new alignment of Alternative B. Analysis of old Alternative B can be found in the EIA study prepared in April 2007. Consequently, there are changes in the - length of Alternative B (new one is 32.3 km and theold one was 27.7 km); - number and length of tunnels, bridges and different crossing types (rivers, streams, existing roads) for Alternative B; - corridor area of Alternative B and combined corridor area of both alternatives; - surfaces of land use types in the case of Alternative B and combined for both alternatives; - sensitivity estimation for natural environment for Alternative B; - sensitivity estimation for settlements (Demir Kapija town) and archaeological sites for Alternative B; - estimation of impacts on natural environment (Bela Voda cave, Greek Juniper community) and human environment. Besides these changes, the text was improved and some of the old charts were corrected and replaced (land use, sensitivity etc.). A new Habitat map (Appendix I.4.) was produced which represents slight modification of the habitat map produced in the study of April 2007. The same is true for the Sensitivity map (Appendix I.5.). EIA Study: Final Construction of Corridor X, Highway E – 75, 2 Section Demir Kapija – Smokvica DATA ON THE PROPONENT Proponent: FUND FOR NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ROADS Register number: 4089600 Location: Ul. "Dame Gruev" Br. 14 Skopje Statutory representative for the Natasha Valkanovska, Director Proponent: Tel., E-mail 02 3118 044 e-mail [email protected] EIA Study: Final Construction of Corridor X, Highway E – 75, 3 Section Demir Kapija – Smokvica EXPERT TEAM (REVISED STUDY, March 2008) Team leader: Dr. Ljupcho Melovski Participants: Dr. Slavcho Hristovski Metodija Velevski Vasko Avukatov EIA Study: Final Construction of Corridor X, Highway E – 75, 4 Section Demir Kapija – Smokvica TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 27 I. 1. THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY................................................................................................................28 I. 2. METHODOLOGY APPLIED WITH SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE CONTENT OF THE STUDY..................................................................................................................................................29 II. BASIC DATA ........................................................................................................................ 31 II. 1. DATA ON THE PROJECT/INTENTION ....................................................................................31 II.1.1. PROJECT SCOPE .................................................................................................................31 II.1.2. PROJECT INPUTS AND OUTPUTS.....................................................................................34 II.1.2.1. Data on inputs..................................................................................................................34 II.1.2.1.1. Raw materials and energy resources during construction:.......................................34 II.1.2.1.2. Raw materials and energy resources for operation ..................................................36 II.1.2.1.3. Demands on auxiliary structures (access roads, borrow pits etc.)............................37 II.1.2.2. Data on outputs................................................................................................................37 II. 2. SPECIFICATION OF MISSING INFORMATION AND UNCERTAINTIES, WHICH APPEARED DURING ELABORATION OF THE STUDY.................................................................37 III. PROCEDURE FOR ELABORATION OF THE STUDY.................................................... 39 III. 1. LEGAL ASPECTS ............................................................................................................................39 III.1.1. Short description of the EIA procedure ................................................................................39 III.1.1.1. Notification on the intention for project implementation...............................................39 III.1.1.2. Screening........................................................................................................................39 III.1.1.3. Scoping...........................................................................................................................40 III.1.1.4. Public participation ........................................................................................................40 III.1.1.5. Review of the EIA Study ...............................................................................................41 III.1.1.6. Granting consent ............................................................................................................41 III.1.2. Transboundary impacts ........................................................................................................42 III.1.3. Other Laws and documents ..................................................................................................42 III.1.4. Ratified Conventions.............................................................................................................42 III.1.5. World Bank regulations on EIA............................................................................................43 III. 2. SPATIAL PLAN...............................................................................................................................43 III.2.1. Tourism development............................................................................................................43 III.2.2. Protected areas.....................................................................................................................44 III.2.2.1. Chelevechka (Iberliska) Reka ........................................................................................45 III.2.2.2. Demir Kapija..................................................................................................................45 IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA OF INTEREST...................................................... 47 IV. 1. CLIMATIC CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................................47 IV.1.1. Air temperature.....................................................................................................................48 IV.1.2. Precipitation .........................................................................................................................50 IV.1.3. Winds.....................................................................................................................................51 IV. 2. GEOMORPHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS...........................................................................52 IV.2.1. Relief .....................................................................................................................................52 IV.2.2. Important geomorphologic structures ..................................................................................53 IV.2.2.1. Aboveground geomorphologic structures......................................................................53 IV.2.2.2. Belowground geomorphologic structures (caves)..........................................................54 IV. 3. GEOLOGIC AND TECTONIC CHARACTERISTICS...............................................................................55 IV.3.1. Geologic structure.................................................................................................................55 IV.3.1.1. Engineering geological characteristics of the rock masses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet
    Update Briefing Europe Briefing N°37 Skopje/Brussels, 25 February 2005 Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet I. OVERVIEW the two parties forced a 7 November 2004 referendum vote on the proposed law. Prime Minister Vlado Buckovski and representatives of Although VMRO was a signatory to the original peace his government and the opposition converged in Brussels agreement, it used the pre-referendum period to question on 14 February 2005 to hand over Macedonia's response sharply the government's performance and the general to the European Commission's 3,000-item questionnaire, wisdom of power-sharing among the ethnic communities. the latest stage in the EU membership application, The government worked to reassure its supporters and which was formally submitted almost a year ago. The argued that its plans would guarantee fast track economic occasion was celebrated by a concert starring Macedonian growth, European integration and better governance. musicians at an exclusive Brussels venue. Appropriately The emergence of Albanian paramilitaries on the enough for St. Valentine's Day, the relationship with the outskirts of Skopje increased tensions and gave rise to EU had taken on a new depth, but nuptials are far from concerns that Macedonia's young and fragile multi-ethnic concluded. The considerable progress Macedonia has democracy might be at serious risk. made is still fragile. The crucial decentralisation process requires careful implementation, and the coalition A strategically-timed U.S. decision to recognise the government and its constituent parties should apply a country's official name as "Macedonia" helped to ensure number of confidence building measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    http://www.grida.no/enrin/biodiv/biodiv/national/fyrom/index.htm Biodiversity Biotope diversity is the pre- requisite for the rich variety of plant species in the territory of Macedonia. The presence of numerous endemic and relict species is especially evident. It has been estimated that there are 3.500 highly developed plants in the Republic of Macedonia; lowly developed plants (moss, algae and fungi) have not been fully investigated yet. There are 122 various plant communities (starting from aquatic to alpine ones), in particular: 21 aquatic and swamp communities; 8 halophytic communities; 2 steppe communities; 50 forest communities; and 51 mountain communities. The Republic of Macedonia is rich with numerous medicinal and aromatic plants, forest fruits, seeds, mushrooms etc.. The dendroflora variety may be seen in the presence of 319 tree types, with more than 80 sub-species and varieties. Within forest eco-systems, more than 80 phytocenozes have been studied and identified. The forest cover is of huge importance for the protection of waters, the land and biodiversity maintaining. The Republic of Macedonia disposes of an enormous richness of animal species distributed throughout its territory. Invertebrates and one-cell organisms have not been fully investigated; research has been done only with a few groups of worms and insects, arthropoda and frog-related species. Vertebrata have been subject to more detailed research. So far, 463 species have been identified, of which 55 fish species, 78 mammal species and 330 bird species. Research is currently under way with amphibia and reptiles, and it is at this stage estimated that there are 13 amphibian and 31 reptile species.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (719Kb)
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 5 Issue 12||December. 2016 || PP.24-31 Historical–Geographic Overview Life Cycle of Tourism and Hospitality in Dojran and Dojran Lake in Republic of Macedonia Nikola V.Dimitrov (PHD)1, Cane Koteski (PHD)2, Tanja Angelkova Petkova (PHD)3, DejanMetodijeski (PHD)4, Dusko Josevski5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (Faculty of tourism and business Logistics – Gevgelija;, University “GoceDelcev” – Stip, R.Macedonia) Abstract: Dojran and Dojran Lake is a specific tourist area located in the southeast region in the Republic of Macedonia.The aim of this paper is to identify the beginning and explain the historical and geographical order of appearance, changes and processes in tourism and hospitality, and parallel to it determines the relationship of the life cycle of tourism in Dojran region. In this space tourism is based on the values of the natural triad, air– water-land,so most tourists use their time for various recreational,sports,health and other activities in and around the lake water. To confirm hypothesis we are using multiple research methods.Research starts with a descriptive method,continue with the evolutive and ends up with empirical method. In addition we use statistical, cartographic and other methods. According to the data from our research the lake and the settlement develop cyclically together with tourism.From the research we established a cycle which in the period of its maximum development is interrupted,and which soon begins to stabilize and rejuvenates with real indicatiors of tourism growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis for Improved Water Supply in Municipality Of
    Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection of the Dojran Lake Catchment Area
    RMZ - Materials and Geoenvironment, Vol 50, No 1, pp 369-372, 2003 369 Environmental protection of the Dojran Lake catchment area RISTO STOJANOV1, BRANKA TRÈEK2, TADEJ DOLENEC3, TRAJAN DIMKOVSKI2 & SIMON PIRC3 1Faculty of Mining and Geology, Goce Delèev 89, 2000 tip, Macedonia; E-mail: info@rgf#ukim#edu#mk 2Geological Survey of Slovenia, Dimièeva ul# 14, SI-100 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: branka#trcek@geo-zs#si, dimkovski@amis#net 3Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Geology, Akerèeva 12, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: tadej#dolenec@ntfgeo#uni-lj#si, simon#pirc@guest#arnes#si Abstract: This paper points out the need of solving the ecological problems of the Dojran Lake and its catchment area, which mainly result from the overexploitation of water sources The most important results of hydrogeological and hydrological investigations are presented and the vulnerability of the territory is characterized Key words: Dojran lake, water sources, overexploitation, ecological problems INTRODUCTION The Dojran Lake and its catchment area are very important sources for the public, industrial and, especially, agricultural water supply The Dojran Lake is located in the south-eastern part of Macedonia on the border with Greece (Figure 1) at 148 m of the altitude The water resources of the Dojran Lake catchment area have been overexploited, which resulted in numerous ecological problems The lake fauna and flora has been changed - many species disappeared, but some new ones appeared that had not been typical for that environment
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73–107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the Collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural Histo
    Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73௅107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) with an annotated check-list of the groups in Macedonia Dragan P. Chobanov & Branislava Mihajlova Abstract During the revision of the Orthoptera collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) in 2004, four Mantodea and 102 Orthoptera species (al- together 1057 specimens) collected in the Republic of Macedonia were deter- mined. Furthermore, a revision of the literature about the Macedonian orthopte- ran fauna was executed and some own unpublished records were added. As a result of the present study, eight taxa are added and 27 taxa are subtracted from the list of the Macedonian fauna. Thus, the updated check list of the Orthoptera fauna of Macedonia comprises four species of Mantodea, 167 Orthoptera taxa and two additional subspecies. The study also revealed that two Orthoptera spe- cies must be eliminated from the list of the Serbian fauna. Zusammenfassung Im Zuge der Bearbeitung der Orthopterensammlung des Naturhistorischen Mu- seums von Mazedonien (Skopje), im Jahre 2004, konnten vier Mantiden- und 102 Orthopterenarten (zusammen 1057 Individuen), die in der Republik Mazedo- nien gesammelt wurden, untersucht werden. Zusätzlich wurde eine umfangreiche Literaturstudie über die mazedonische Orthopterenfauna durchgeführt, die weite- re Nachweise lieferte. Die vorliegende Studie ergab acht neue Taxa für Mazedo- nien, wohingegen 27 der für die mazedonische Fauna angegebenen Taxa nicht in Mazedonien vorkommen. Die aktuelle Checkliste der Orthopterenfauna Maze- doniens enthält somit vier Arten Gottesanbeterinnen, 167 Heuschreckenarten und zwei weitere Unterarten.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    E2120 EMP Checklist for Construction and Rehabilitation Activities General Guidelines for use of EMP checklist: For low-risk topologies, such as school and hospital rehabilitation activities, the ECA Public Disclosure Authorized safeguards team developed an alternative to the current EMP format to provide an opportunity for a more streamlined approach to preparing EMPs for minor rehabilitation or small-scale works in building construction, in the health, education and public services sectors. The checklist-type format has been developed to provide “example good practices” and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguard requirements. The EMP checklist-type format attempts to cover typical core mitigation approaches to civil works contracts with small, localized impacts. It is accepted that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental Management Framework (EMF) to meet World Bank Environmental Assessment requirements under OP 4.01. The intention of this checklist is that it would be applicable as guidelines for the small works contractors and constitute an Public Disclosure Authorized integral part of bidding documents for contractors carrying out small civil works under Bank-financed projects. The checklist has three sections: Part 1 includes a descriptive part that characterizes the project and specifies in terms the institutional and legislative aspects, the technical project content, the potential need for capacity building program and description of the public consultation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for additional information can be supplemented when needed. Part 2 includes an environmental and social screening checklist, where activities and potential environmental issues can be checked in a simple Yes/No format.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Sector
    Transport Sector Section 1 On-going projects (in implementation phase) Project duration Nr. Project title Total investment Grant/ Loan/ National Co- Project brief description (location included) (preparation+ (sector included) cost Source Source financimg implementation TRANSPORT Construction of motorway Kicevo- 598.000.000 EXIM 1. The length of the road is 57 km and is part of Corridor VIII. 2014-2023 PESR Ohrid € bank Construction of express road Stip- 2. The road section is in a length of 23.5 km. 2018-2021 45.020.000 € EBRD Radovis Construction of express road Stip- 3. The road section is divided in two sections with total length of 28 km. 2017-2021 51.000.000 € EBRD Krupiste-Kocani 15% Construction of the road section Construction of an express road in a total length of 15.5 km as part of branch X-D of IPA II 4. 2018-2022 28.000.000 € National Drenovo-Interchange Gradsko Corridor X (85%) budget Construction of express road Raec Construction of an express road in a total length of 10 km as part of branch X-D of 5. 2016-2022 45.000.000 € EBRD bridge-Drenovo (Faris gorge- Corridor X (Contract is terminated in September 2019) ConstructionDrenovo of gorge)express way 6. Kumanovo – border with Bulgaria The total length of the section is 23 km. 2018-2022 63.500.000 € WB (section Rankovci – Kriva Palanka) Rehabilitation of regional road 7. The road is with total length is 3.30 km. 2017-2019 1.113.000€ PESR Matejce – Lipkovo Construction of a bridge near Konjare 8. A bridge is being constructed over the river Pcinja.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions Clubs International Club Membership Register Summary the Clubs and Membership Figures Reflect Changes As of March 2008
    LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL CLUB MEMBERSHIP REGISTER SUMMARY THE CLUBS AND MEMBERSHIP FIGURES REFLECT CHANGES AS OF MARCH 2008 CLUB CLUB LAST MMR FCL YR OB MEMBERSHI P CHANGES TOTAL IDENT CLUB NAME DIST NBR STATUS RPT DATE NEW RENST TRANS DROPS NETCG MEMBERSH 7887 059382 SKOPJE 4 02-2008 28 2 0 0 -3 -1 27 7887 059920 SKOPJE GAZI BABA 4 02-2008 30 0 0 0 -8 -8 22 7887 061610 SKOPJE ST PANTELEMON 4 02-2008 40 0 0 0 -1 -1 39 7887 063553 VARDAR SKOPJE 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 26 7887 065042 SKOPJE IDADIJA 4 03-2008 21 6 0 0 -5 1 22 7887 084017 SKOPJE CENTRE 4 01-2008 21 8 0 0 0 8 29 7887 084018 SKOPJE MACEDONIA NEW CENTURY 4 03-2008 23 3 1 0 -2 2 25 7887 089049 SKOPJE SVETLINA LIGHT 4 02-2008 19 5 0 0 -2 3 22 7887 097275 DENARIUS 4 12-2007 21 9 3 1 -6 7 28 7887 098235 SKOPJE VODNO 4 02-2008 24 4 0 0 -2 2 26 7887 099369 OHRID 4 01-2008 24 0 0 0 0 0 24 7887 099370 SKOPJE ALFA 4 01-2008 25 1 0 0 -1 0 25 7887 099545 BITOLA 4 11-2007 21 8 0 0 0 8 29 7887 099546 STIP 4 03-2008 21 0 0 0 0 0 21 7887 099549 OHRID DESARETI 4 03-2008 26 0 0 0 -2 -2 24 7887 100188 KICEVO 4 03-2008 0 24 0 0 0 24 24 7887 100189 KUMANOVO 4 09-2007 0 23 0 0 0 23 23 7887 100785 BOGDANCI 4 12-2007 0 25 0 0 0 25 25 7887 101005 STRUGA 5 01-2008 0 22 0 0 0 22 22 GRAND TOTALS Total Clubs: 19 370 140 4 1 -32 113 483 Club Status: 4 - Good Standing 5 - Newly Chartered 6 - Cancelled 7 - Status Quo Page 1 of 3 NOTE: No date in the “LAST MMR RPTClub DATE” Status column Changes means, for: thatIDENT the 7887club has not submitted any MMR’s for the currentClub reporting Clubyear, Nameeither by the web site or mail.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]