CLASSIFICATION of GYMNOSPERMS Class -A: Cycadophyta Orders- Pteridospermae, Gymnosperms Have Been Classified Cyacadeoidales and Differently by Various Workers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CLASSIFICATION of GYMNOSPERMS Class -A: Cycadophyta Orders- Pteridospermae, Gymnosperms Have Been Classified Cyacadeoidales and Differently by Various Workers 1 | P a g e Subject: Botany Topic: Gymnosperms-General Features Batch: B.Sc. Part -II(Bot-Hons) Dept. of Botany A.N.College, Patna - Sushil Kr Singh Associate Professor Dept. of Botany ANC, Patna BSc Part II(Bot Hons)/ Dept. Of Bot/ ANC, Patna/Sushil 2 | P a g e CLASSIFICATION OF GYMNOSPERMS Class -a: Cycadophyta Orders- Pteridospermae, Gymnosperms have been classified Cyacadeoidales and differently by various workers. Some of Cycadales these are as follows: Class-b. Coniferaphyta Gymnosperms were recognized as a Orders -Cordaitales, distinct taxonomic group by Robert Ginkgoales, Brown (1827) and they were placed Taxales and along with angiosperms. Even Bentham Coniferales and Hooker placed them between Class-c. Chlamydospermophyta monocotyledons and dicotyledons. It Orders - Ephedrales and was Van Tieghem (1898) who Gnetales recognized gymnosperms as one of two Pant (1957) suggested a classification major Divisions of Spermatophyta – The which is essentially a modification of gymnosperms (Astigmatae) and Arnold’s classification. He raised these Angiosperms (Stigmatae). Coulter and classes to three Divisions: Chamberlain (1917) divided the group Division 1: Cycadolphyta gymnosperms into seven orders: Class-a Pteridospermopsida Order- Medullosales Cyacadofilicales Glossopteridales Bennettitales Peltaspermales Cyacadales Corystospermales Cordiatales Caytoniales Class b Cyacadopsida Ginkgoales Order- Cycadales Coniferales and Class c Pentoxylopsida Gnetales Order- Pentoxylales Class d Bennettitopsida It was later modified by Chamberlain Order- Bennettitales (1935) who divided the group into two Division -2 Chlamydospermophyta classes Class – Gnetopsida Cyacadophytes - Order- Gnetales Welwitschiales Cyacadofilicales Division-3- Coniferophyta Bennettitales Class-a Coniferopsida Order- Coniferales Cyacadales Ginkgoales Coniferophytes Cordiatales Class b Ephedropsida Ginkgoales Order- Ephedrales Coniferales and Class-c Czokanowkiopsida Order- Czekanowkiales Gnetales Class- Taxopsida Sahni (1920) emphasized on the origin Order- Taxales) of ovules and divided gymnosperms into Pant’s classification of Gymnosperm into three A. Stachyospermae (Cordiatales, Divisions was followed by Andrews (1961) where Ginkgoales, Coniferales and Taxales) he created six Divisions. These are Pteridopsermophyta (Pteridospermales) and Cycadophyta (Cycadales and Bennettitales) B. Phyllospermae (Pteridosperms and Ginkgophyta (Ginkgoales) Cycadales and probably Bennettitales). Coniferophyta (Coniferales and Cordaitales) Arnold (1948) recognized three classes Gnetophyta (Gnetales)and in gymnosperms Gymnosperms of uncertain origin (Pentoxylales and Vojnovskiales) BSc Part II(Bot Hons)/ Dept. Of Bot/ ANC, Patna/Sushil 3 | P a g e Sporne recognized three classes Cycadeoidophyta Class I- Cycadopsida Ginkgophyta - Pteridospermales Coniferophyta and - Bennettitales Gnetophyta - Pentoxylales Recently Kramer and Green (1990) divided - Cyacadales Gymnosperms under Class II- Coniferopsida Division – Gymnosperms - Cordiatales Sub division – Coniferophytina - Coniferales Class 1 - Ginkgoatae - Taxales Class 2 – Pinatae - Ginkgoales Sub-div- Cycadophytina Class III Gnetopsida –Gnetales Class 1 – Cycadatae Steward (1983 placed Class 2 - Gnetatae Progymnospermopsida, Gymnospermopsida and Gnetopsida, under Div-Tracheophyta of Kingdom Plantae. Meyen (1984) adopted a system of classification of Gymnosperms with the single Division Pinophyta (Gymnospermae) He included three classes Ginkgopsida Cyacadopsida and Pinopsida Gifford and Foster (1989) created seven divisions in the gymnosperms. These divisions are as follows Progymnospermophyta, Pteridopsermophyta Pteridopsermophyta Cyacadophyta BSc Part II(Bot Hons)/ Dept. Of Bot/ ANC, Patna/Sushil .
Recommended publications
  • The Jurassic Fossil Wood Diversity from Western Liaoning, NE China
    Jiang et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-018-0018-y Journal of Palaeogeography RESEARCH Open Access The Jurassic fossil wood diversity from western Liaoning, NE China Zi-Kun Jiang1,2, Yong-Dong Wang2,3*, Ning Tian4,5, Ao-Wei Xie2,6, Wu Zhang7, Li-Qin Li2 and Min Huang1 Abstract Western Liaoning is a unique region in China that bears diverse types of Jurassic plants, including leaves, fern rhizomes, and wood, providing significant proxy for vegetation and palaeoenvironment reconstruction of the well-known Yanliao Flora in East Asia. In particular, the silicified wood is very abundant in the fossil Lagerstätte of the Jurassic Tiaojishan Formation in Beipiao, western Liaoning. Previous and recent systematic investigations documented a high diversity of the Jurassic wood assemblages. These assemblages are dominated by conifers, followed by cycads and ginkgoaleans. In total, about 30 species belonging to 21 genera of fossil wood have been recorded so far, which are represented by Cycadopsida, Ginkgopsida, Coniferopsida, and Gymnospermae incertae sedis. The evolutionary implications of several distinctive fossil wood taxa as well as palaeoclimate implications are summarized based on their anatomical structures and growth ring patterns. This work approaches the vegetation development and evolutionary significances of the wood taxa and their relatives, and provides clues for the further understanding of the diversity of the Jurassic Yanliao Flora in East Asia. Keywords: Fossil wood, Diversity, Evolution, Tiaojishan Formation, Jurassic 1 Introduction 2004;Wangetal.,2009). Among these localities, western Fossil floras are a significant record for the vegetation Liaoning is a well-known fossil Lagerstätte with diverse and for the palaeoenvironment reconstructions of the and well-preserved fossil plant foliages and wood (Zhang Mesozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life
    Plant Evolution An Introduction to the History of Life KARL J. NIKLAS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction 1 1 Origins and Early Events 29 2 The Invasion of Land and Air 93 3 Population Genetics, Adaptation, and Evolution 153 4 Development and Evolution 217 5 Speciation and Microevolution 271 6 Macroevolution 325 7 The Evolution of Multicellularity 377 8 Biophysics and Evolution 431 9 Ecology and Evolution 483 Glossary 537 Index 547 v Introduction The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is. It’s how nature creates itself, on every scale, the snowflake and the snowstorm. — TOM STOPPARD, Arcadia, Act 1, Scene 4 (1993) Much has been written about evolution from the perspective of the history and biology of animals, but significantly less has been writ- ten about the evolutionary biology of plants. Zoocentricism in the biological literature is understandable to some extent because we are after all animals and not plants and because our self- interest is not entirely egotistical, since no biologist can deny the fact that animals have played significant and important roles as the actors on the stage of evolution come and go. The nearly romantic fascination with di- nosaurs and what caused their extinction is understandable, even though we should be equally fascinated with the monarchs of the Carboniferous, the tree lycopods and calamites, and with what caused their extinction (fig. 0.1). Yet, it must be understood that plants are as fascinating as animals, and that they are just as important to the study of biology in general and to understanding evolutionary theory in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 20 Years of Plant Genome Sequencing: an Unprecedented Resource in Need of More Diverse Representation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446451; this version posted May 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from 20 years of plant genome sequencing: an unprecedented resource in need of more diverse representation Authors: Rose A. Marks1,2,3, Scott Hotaling4, Paul B. Frandsen5,6, and Robert VanBuren1,2 1. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2. Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 4. School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 5. Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA 6. Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Keywords: plants, embryophytes, genomics, colonialism, broadening participation Correspondence: Rose A. Marks, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Email: [email protected]; Phone: (603) 852-3190; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-5959 Abstract The field of plant genomics has grown rapidly in the past 20 years, leading to dramatic increases in both the quantity and quality of publicly available genomic resources. With an ever- expanding wealth of genomic data from an increasingly diverse set of taxa, unprecedented potential exists to better understand the evolution and genome biology of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the End-Permian Dead Zone
    Life in the end-Permian dead zone Cindy V. Looy*†, Richard J. Twitchett‡, David L. Dilcher§, Johanna H. A. Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert*, and Henk Visscher* *Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0740; and §Paleobotany Laboratory, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Contributed by David L. Dilcher, May 1, 2001 The fossil record of land plants is an obvious source of information ecological crisis. On the basis of palynological data from a ‘‘dead on the dynamics of mass extinctions in the geological past. In zone’’ in a Permian–Triassic (P-Tr) transition sequence from conjunction with the end-Permian ecological crisis, Ϸ250 million East Greenland, in this paper we document evidence of non- years ago, palynological data from East Greenland reveal some equilibrium vegetation dynamics resulting in selective but time- unanticipated patterns. We document the significant time lag delayed extinctions among woody gymnosperms. between terrestrial ecosystem collapse and selective extinction among characteristic Late Permian plants. Furthermore, ecological The End-Permian ‘‘Dead Zone’’ crisis resulted in an initial increase in plant diversity, instead of a Latest Permian and earliest Triassic sediments in East Green- decrease. Paradoxically, these floral patterns correspond to a land (Fig. 1) are represented by the upper part of the Schuchert ‘‘dead zone’’ in the end-Permian faunal record, characterized by a Dal Formation and the overlying Wordie Creek Formation. The paucity of marine invertebrate megafossils. The time-delayed, predominantly fine-grained siliciclastic sediments of these for- end-Permian plant extinctions resemble modeled ‘‘extinction mations were deposited in a narrow, elongate, shallow-marine debt’’ responses of multispecies metapopulations to progressive basin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visual Guide to Collecting Plant Tissues for DNA
    A visual guide to collecting plant tissues for DNA Collecting kit checklist Silica gel1 Permanent marker and pencil Resealable bags, airtight plastic container Razor blade / Surgical scissors Empty tea bags or coffee filters Ethanol and paper tissue or ethanol wipes Tags or jewellers tags Plant press and collecting book 1. Selection and preparation of fresh plant tissue: Sampling avoided. Breaking up leaf material will bruise the plant tissue, which will result in enzymes being released From a single plant, harvest 3 – 5 mature leaves, or that cause DNA degradation. Ideally, leaf material sample a piece of a leaf, if large (Picture A). Ideally should be cut into smaller fragments with thick a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2 should be enough, but this midribs being removed (Picture C). If sampling robust amount should be adjusted if the plant material is leaf tissue (e.g. cycads, palms), use a razor blade or rich in water (e.g. a succulent plant). If leaves are surgical scissors (Picture D). small (e.g. ericoid leaves), sample enough material to equate a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2. If no leaves are Succulent plants available, other parts can be sampled such as leaf buds, flowers, bracts, seeds or even fresh bark. If the If the leaves are succulent, use a razor blade to plant is small, select the biggest specimen, but never remove epidermal slices or scoop out parenchyma combine tissues from different individuals. tissue (Picture E). Cleaning Ideally, collect clean fresh tissues, however if the leaf or plant material is dirty or shows potential contamination (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorophyta Is a Division of Green Algae, Informally Called
    Chlorophyta is a division of green algae, informally waters of the Sargasso Sea. Many brown algae, such as called chlorophytes. The name is used in two very members of the order Fucales, commonly grow along different senses so that care is needed to determine the rocky seashores. Some members of the class are used as use by a particular author. In older classification food for humans. systems, it refers to a highly paraphyletic group of all Worldwide there are about 1500–2000 species of brown the green algae within the green plants (Viridiplantae), algae.[4] Some species are of sufficient commercial and thus includes about 7,000 species [4] [5] of mostly importance, such as Ascophyllum nodosum , that they aquatic photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms. Like the have become subjects of extensive research in their own land plants (bryophytes and tracheophytes), green algae right.[5] [4] contain chlorophylls a and b, and store food as starch Brown algae belong to a very large group, the in their plastids. Heterokontophyta, a eukaryotic group of organisms In newer classifications, it refers to one of the two distinguished most prominently by having chloroplasts clades making up the Viridiplantae, which are the surrounded by four membranes, suggesting an origin chlorophytes and the streptophytes or charophytes.[6][7] from a symbiotic relationship between a basal In this sense it includes only about 4,300 species.[3] eukaryote and another eukaryotic organism. Most brown algae contain the pigment fucoxanthin, which is responsible for the distinctive greenish-brown color that The red algae, or Rhodophyta ( / r o ʊ ˈ d ɒ f ɨ t ə / or / gives them their name.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • X. the Conifers and Ginkgo
    X. The Conifers and Ginkgo Now we turn our attention to the Coniferales, another great assemblage of seed plants. First let's compare the conifers with the cycads: Cycads Conifers few apical meristems per plant many apical meristems per plant leaves pinnately divided leaves undivided wood manoxylic wood pycnoxylic seeds borne on megaphylls seeds borne on stems We should also remember that these two groups have a lot in common. To begin with, they are both groups of woody seed plants. They are united by a small set of derived features: 1) the basic structure of the stele (a eustele or a sympodium, two words for the same thing) and no leaf gaps 2) the design of the apical meristem (many initials, subtended by a slowly dividing group of cells called the central mother zone) 3) the design of the tracheids (circular-bordered pits with a torus) We have three new seed plant orders to examine this week: A. Cordaitales This is yet another plant group from the coal forest. (Find it on the Peabody mural!) The best-known genus, Cordaites, is a tree with pycnoxylic wood bearing leaves up to about a foot and a half long and four inches wide. In addition, these trees bore sporangia (micro- and mega-) in strobili in the axils of these big leaves. The megasporangia were enclosed in ovules. Look at fossils of leaves and pollen-bearing shoots of Cordaites. The large, many-veined megaphylls are ancestral to modern pine needles; the shoots are ancestral to pollen-bearing strobili of modern conifers. 67 B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Plants by Luke Wallace
    A Brief History of Plants by Luke Wallace Let us skip the first two and a half their success on land. Today, these plants new group, the seed-bearing gymnosperms, billion years of the Earth’s history from only survive in the groups known as the Club came to dominate. Placed in this group is when organic compounds in our early mosses, Whisk fern, Horsetails and, a group I Ginkophyta (Ginkgo biloba being the only Evidence shows that atmosphere made the transition to single am sure we are all familiar with, the Ferns. extant member of this group), Gnetophyta, during the Permian celled organisms via the creation of It is in a small number of Fern species that Cycads and, of course, the Conifers. For the nucleotides, RNA and DNA. For the sake of era a new group, we first see the production of separate male most part, gymnosperms did relatively well brevity, we will also have to gloss over the the seed-bearing sperm cells and female egg cells, the earliest throughout the Permian, Triassic and Jurassic adaptive radiation of early multicellular known plant lineage capable of this biological periods, exhibiting much more diversity and gymnosperms, organisms that would eventually lead phenomenon. This is thought to be crucial abundance than we see now. to the colonisation of the land 425 - 475 came to dominate. to the evolution of seed-bearing plants. million years ago. These stories could not However, during the Jurassic, another group of Placed in this group Simply put, up until this point plants produced be done justice here! plants were rapidly growing in dominance and identical sex cells and relied on water to by the Cretaceous this new plant superpower is Ginkophyta, Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts (known bring these together.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany
    Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany cuGU .叮 v FimditLU'φL-EjAA ρummmm 吋 eαymGfr 伊拉ddd仇側向iep M d、 況 O C O W Illustrations by the author uc削 ∞叩N Nn凹創 刊,叫MH h 咀 可 白 a aEE-- EEA First published in 1987 by Chapman αndHallLtd 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Published in the USA by Chα~pman and H all 29 West 35th Street: New Yo地 NY 10001 。 1987 S. V. M秒len Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1987 ISBN-13: 978-94-010-7916-7 e-ISBN-13: 978-94-009-3151-0 DO1: 10.1007/978-94-009-3151-0 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei V. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. 1. Palaeobotany I. Title 11. Osnovy paleobotaniki. English 561 QE905 Library 01 Congress Catα loging in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei Viktorovich. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Paleobotany. I. Title. QE904.AIM45 561 8ι13000 Contents Foreword page xi Introduction xvii Acknowledgements xx Abbreviations xxi 1. Preservation 抄'pes αnd techniques of study of fossil plants 1 2. Principles of typology and of nomenclature of fossil plants 5 Parataxa and eutaxa S Taxa and characters 8 Peculiarity of the taxonomy and nomenclature of fossil plants 11 The binary (dual) system of fossil plants 12 The reasons for the inflation of generic na,mes 13 The species problem in palaeobotany lS The polytypic concept of the species 17 Assemblage-genera and assemblage-species 17 The cladistic methods 18 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Flora of Cape 1,Isburne Alaska
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR THE JURASSIC FLORA OF CAPE 1,ISBURNE ALASKA F. H. KNOWLTON Publishecl January 28, 1914 PART D OF PROFESSIONAL PAPER 85, "CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY 1913" WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page . Introduction ............................................................................................ 39 The Corwin formation ..................................................................................... 39 Plant collections ......................................................................................... 40 Age of the plant-bearing beds ............................................................................. 41 Distribution of Jurassic floras ............................................................................. 43 Geographicrange .................................................................................... 43 Means of dispersal ................................................................................... 45 Avenues of dispersal ................................................................................. 45 Probable climatic conditions .......................................................................... 46 .The flora ................................................................................................ 46 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page . PLATESV-VIII . Jurassic flora of Cape Lisburne, Alaska .................................................... 57-64 THE' JUR,ASSIC FLORA OF CAPE
    [Show full text]