Conservation Practices at Foreign-Run Archaeological Excavations in Turkey: a Critical Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Practices at Foreign-Run Archaeological Excavations in Turkey: a Critical Review CONSERVATION PRACTICES AT FOREIGN-RUN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS IN TURKEY: A CRITICAL REVIEW A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BİLGE NİLGÜN ÖZ WOOD IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CONSERVATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN ARCHITECTURE DECEMBER 2017 Approval of the Thesis: CONSERVATION PRACTICES AT FOREIGN-RUN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS IN TURKEY: A CRITICAL REVIEW submitted by BİLGE NİLGÜN ÖZ WOOD in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Architecture Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver _____________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. T. Elvan Altan _____________ Head of Department, Architecture Assoc. Prof. Dr. A. Güliz Bilgin Altınöz _____________ Supervisor, Architecture Department, METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Neriman Şahin Güçhan _____________ Architecture Department, METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. A. Güliz Bilgin Altınöz _____________ Architecture Department, METU Prof. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas _____________ City and Regional Planning Department, METU Prof. Dr. M. Cengiz Can _____________ Architecture Department, Yıldız Technical University Senior Lecturer Alan M. Greaves (UK) _____________ Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool Date: 08.12.2017 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name : BİLGE NİLGÜN ÖZ WOOD Signature : iv ABSTRACT CONSERVATION PRACTICES AT FOREIGN-RUN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS IN TURKEY: A CRITICAL REVIEW Öz Wood, Bilge Nilgün Ph.D. in Conservation of Cultural Heritage, Department Architecture Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. A. Güliz Bilgin Altınöz December 2017, 504 pages Foreign-run excavations are a significant component of archaeological research in Turkey, however, conservation work carried out at these excavations has not been examined in a holistic manner. This research investigates archaeological conservation at foreign-run excavations to identify the scale and nature of differing contributions, and to determine changing approaches, issues impacting conservation practices, as well as possible catalysts, influences and driving forces. The thematic scope, ‘conservation of archaeological sites’ and related practices, includes technical, socio-political and economic perspectives in a way that reflects developing trends in heritage conservation. The temporal scope of this research concentrates on the period 1979-2014. The sources used are previously published literature, interviews with directors, conservation professionals and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, as well as site observations. A representative sample of 19 foreign- run excavations was selected. v The research has identified a significant move towards the integration of conservation work into archaeological processes, and also that architectural conservation remains a major focus at almost all of the sites. Despite the widening scope of conservation practices to embrace the use of management planning and the involvement of local communities, these remain less widespread. The growing variety of funding sources has enabled the implementation of numerous large and small-scale conservation projects but conservation work, primarily architectural conservation, has been mostly implemented through private funding. Issues such as the Ministry of Culture and Tourism’s lack of consultation, its architectural emphasis on conservation, as well as institutional cooperation, are some of the more pressing problems, while pervading links between Turkey’s repatriation efforts and archaeological permits also impact conservation. International guidelines, operational and regulatory frameworks, financial sources, differences in national approaches, and key individuals are identified as various possible catalysts, influences and driving forces behind conservation practices. Keywords: Conservation of Archaeological Sites, Cultural Heritage Conservation, Foreign-run Archaeological Excavation, Foreign Archaeological Project vi ÖZ TÜRKİYE’DE YABANCILAR TARAFINDAN YÜRÜTÜLEN ARKEOLOJİK KAZILARDAKİ KORUMA ÇALIŞMALARI: ELEŞTİREL BİR İNCELEME Öz Wood, Bilge Nilgün Doktora, Kültür Mirasının Korunması, Mimarlık Bölümü Danışman: Doç. Dr. A. Güliz Bilgin Altınöz Aralık 2017, 504 sayfa Türkiye’deki arkeolojik araştırmaların önemli bir parçasını oluşturan yabancı kazılardaki koruma çalışmaları bugüne kadar bütüncül bir şekilde incelenmemiştir. Bu araştırma, bu kazılarda gerçekleştirilen koruma çalışmalarının boyutunu ve kapsamını, değişen yaklaşımları, çalışmaları etkileyen etmenleri ve çalışmaların arkasında yatan olası katalizörlerle itici güçleri belirlemeyi ve değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın tematik kapsamını oluşturan ‘arkeolojik alanların koruması’ ve ilgili pratikler, kültür mirasının korunmasındaki gelişmeleri yansıtacak şekilde korumanın teknik, sosyo-politik ve ekonomik boyutlarını içermektedir. Araştırmanın zamansal kapsamını 1979-2014 yılları arası oluşturmaktadır. Daha önce yayınlanmış basılı kaynakların yanı sıra yabancı kazı başkanları, koruma uzmanları ve Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı ile yapılan görüşmeler ve arazi gözlemleri araştırmanın kaynaklarını oluşturmaktadır. İnceleme, temsilen seçilen 19 yabancı arkeolojik kazı üzerinde yapılmıştır. vii Araştırma, koruma çalışmalarının arkeolojik süreçlere belirgin bir şekilde dahil olma yolunda olduğunu ve neredeyse çalışılan tüm kazılarda mimari koruma çalışmalarının en önemli odak noktasını oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Koruma çalışmalarının kapsamı yönetim planlaması ve yerel toplulukların koruma etkinliklerine katılımını da içerecek şekilde genişlemiş olsa da bu tür çalışmalar pek yaygınlaşmamıştır. Maddi kaynakların çeşitliliğinin artmasının birçok küçük ve büyük ölçekli koruma projesinin gerçekleştirilmesine olanak sağladığı ancak özellikle mimari koruma çalışmalarının daha çok özel kurum ve şahıslardan sağlanan kaynakların yardımıyla gerçekleştirildiği tespit edilmiştir. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı’nın tarafları bilgilendirmesi ve onlara danışmasındaki eksiklikler ve korumayı daha çok mimari ölçekte ele almasının yanı sıra kurumlararası işbirbirliğinin yetersiz olması önemli sorunlardan bazılarıdır. Bununla beraber Türkiye’nin yurtdışından bazı eski eserlerin geri alınması konusundaki çalışmaları ve bunun arkeolojik kazı izinleriyle ilişkilendirilmesi koruma çalışmalarını etkilemektedir. Uluslararası ilkeler, yasal ve yönetsel çerçeveler, maddi kaynaklar, farklı ulusal ve kişisel yaklaşımların koruma pratiklerinin arkasında yatan bazı katalizörler, etkiler ve itici güçler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Arkeolojik Alanların Korunması, Kültür Mirasının Korunması, Yabancı Arkeolojik Kazı, Yabancı Arkeolojik Proje viii To my parents ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research owes much to a large number of people. Firstly, I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to my supervisor, Güliz Bilgin Altınöz. Her guidance and critical judgement throughout the process have been of utmost importance. Cevat Erder has seen this research develop from its inception, and his valuable comments and encouragement have been especially welcome. I am grateful to my Thesis Monitoring Committee members at METU, Neriman Şahin Güçhan, and Burcu Erciyas for their support and constructive comments. Gül Pulhan, a former member of the Thesis Monitoring Committee, also made valuable contributions in the earlier stages of this research. Special thanks go to Alan Greaves, whose warm welcome and support during my visiting research fellowship at the University of Liverpool greatly contributed to this research. I thoroughly appreciated his recommendations as a member of the Thesis Examining Committee, as well as those of Cengiz Can of Yıldız Technical University. At METU, I would also particularly like to thank Nimet Özgönül, my supervisor for my MSc in Restoration, and Ayşıl T. Yavuz for their continued guidance and support. I would like to express my gratitude to all the directors who welcomed me at their archaeological excavations. They, together with conservation professionals in their teams, gave significant amounts of time during their hectic schedules and responded enthusiastically to my questions. Their contribution has been invaluable. The Mediterranean site visits were funded by the Suna-İnan Kıraç Research Institute on Mediterranean Civilizations (AKMED). My fellowship at the University of Liverpool provided an ideal research environment and library facilities that helped me formulate and develop my initial ideas. I also benefitted greatly from communal academic setting of the x Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (RCAC/ANAMED) in Istanbul during my BIAA-RCAC fellowship. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to my friends: to Sermin Çakıcı Alp for her wholehearted encouragement and for lending a supportive ear, to Zehra Tulunoğlu for hosting me during my many stays in Ankara and for accompanying me on my very last site visit, to Oya Bakacak, Tuba Akar, Gökçe Şimşek and Ege Yıldırım for their kind support and encouragement, to Ali Çifçi for taking me under his wing in Liverpool and for his friendship ever since, to Pınar
Recommended publications
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________May 22, 2008 I, _________________________________________________________,Kristin Marie Barry hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture in: College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning It is entitled: The New Archaeological Museum: Reuniting Place and Artifact This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________Elizabeth Riorden _______________________________Rebecca Williamson _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ The New Archaeological Museum: Reuniting Place and Artifact Kristin Barry Bachelor of Science in Architecture University of Cincinnati May 30, 2008 Submittal for Master of Architecture Degree College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning Prof. Elizabeth Riorden Abstract Although various resources have been provided at archaeological ruins for site interpretation, a recent change in education trends has led to a wider audience attending many international archaeological sites. An innovation in museum typology is needed to help tourists interpret the artifacts that been found at the site in a contextual manner. Through a study of literature by experts such as Victoria Newhouse, Stephen Wells, and other authors, and by analyzing successful interpretive center projects, I have developed a document outlining the reasons for on-site interpretive centers and their functions and used this material in a case study at the site of ancient Troy. My study produced a research document regarding museology and design strategy for the physical building, and will be applicable to any new construction on a sensitive site. I hope to establish a precedent that sites can use when adapting to this new type of visitors. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank a number of people for their support while I have been completing this program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch
    1 The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context *See page 4 for citation. Julian Hirsch 2 Acknowledgements In some ways the groundwork for my thesis and work on the ONESC Initiative began more than five years ago in a kitchen in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. I was meeting Dr. Elizabeth Bloch Smith for the first time and could scarcely have imagined that our meeting would lead to my participation in an archaeological excavation in Israel that summer. After my first excavation, I was hooked. The spring before I came to Oberlin was filled with weekly meetings, readings, and discussions with Liz. I learned so much in that time and appreciate her continued guidance and support. If Liz was responsible for exposing me to just how fascinating the archaeology of the southern Levant was, Dr. Jeffrey Blakely was the person who helped me find the path where I could follow my passion at Oberlin. I still have my notes from the first day of the January 2017 Winter Term. I was amazed by everything Jeff knew about the history of biblical archaeology at the college and the history of the collection. If anything inspired me throughout my work, it was hearing vivid stories from Jeff about sitting in Harry Thomas Frank’s classroom learning about archaeology. Jeff has truly been my partner at every step of the way. I’ve consulted him for advice numerous times. Jeff kindly provided invaluable suggestions that only a true veteran of the field could offer. To give credit to Jeff in two more areas, Jeff certainly inspired my interest in the history of biblical archaeology and during the Winter Term in 2017 assigned me to work on the Bab edh-Dhra’ collection of Early Bronze Age tomb pots.
    [Show full text]
  • Batuhan Kurtaran
    ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY OF TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BATUHAN KURTARAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Oktay Fırat Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Oktay Fırat Tanrısever Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Nuri Yurdusev (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Oktay Fırat Tanrısever (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Burak Tangör (Hacettepe Uni., INT) PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Batuhan Kurtaran Signature: iii ABSTRACT ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY OF TURKEY Kurtaran, Batuhan M.S., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Oktay Fırat Tanrısever August 2020, 171 pages This thesis aims to clarify Turkey’s economic diplomacy in the 2000s. The main argument of this thesis is that Turkish economic diplomacy strategy in the relevant period is to have more multidirectional and more multidimensional foreign economic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Diplomatic Missions in Turkey
    GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS IN TURKEY 1 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs http://www.mfa.gov.tr PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1. GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Diplomatic Missions ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Consular Posts ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 International Organizations ................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Family Members ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Turkish Nationals .................................................................................................................... 8 2. PROTOCOL PROCEDURES FOR THE ARRIVAL OF MEMBERS OF STAFF AT DIPLOMATIC/CONSULAR MISSONS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................... 8 2.1 Notification of Arrival ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Identity (ID) Cards ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Family Members ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Program for the First-Time Ambassadors and Their Spouses
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of TURKEY DIPLOMACY ACADEMY NEWSLETTER (October— December 2019) Training for the First-Time Ambassadors and their Spouses Training Program for the Cambodian Diplomats Training Program for the Nigerien Diplomats Training Program for the Palestinian Diplomats Training Program for Tajik Diplomats Meeting with the Indonesian Delegation Meeting with the Namibian Delegation Meeting with the Zambian Delegation Spanish Language Course for the MFA Staff Field Trip to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Foreign Minister H.E. Mevlu t Çavuşog lu with the newly-appointed Ambassadors Training Program for the First-Time Ambassadors and Their Spouses With 246 missions abroad (142 Embassies, 139 Consulates, 16 Permanent Representatives and 1 Consular Agency), Turkey has the fifth largest global diplomatic network. This vast network entails, every year, the assignment of a large number of diplomatic personnel to these Turkish missions. To ensure the preparedness of these officers and their spouses for their new duties and responsibilities, the Academy organizes various orientation programs prior to the postings. Between October 28—November 8, 2019, the Academy organized an orientation program for the first-time Ambassadors and their spouses. The training commenced with the opening address by Deputy Foreign Minister H.E. Yavuz Selim Kıran on October 28, 2019. Throughout the training, Ministry officials, academics and speakers from other public institutions gave seminars on staff management, administration and finance, relations with the press, consular issues, public speaking and leadership. The training also featured meetings with the representatives from Yunus Emre Cultural Institute, Presidency for Turks Abroad and Related Communities, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency and Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Exports: the Heart of Nep
    How to Export to 2018 Turkey This report includes all the information related to trade basics and detailed data regarding export from Brazil to Turkey. This report is for information purposes only and Tumer Eng. will not be liable to any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data, or other intangible losses. Ver:1.0 2018 1 Contents 1 Why Turkey.................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 General Information .............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Geography ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.1 Distances ....................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.2 Climate of Turkey .......................................................................................................... 19 1.2.2.1 Air temperature changes until now .......................................................................... 20 1.2.2.2 Precipitation changes until now ................................................................................ 21 1.2.2.3 Air temperature changes in the 21st century ........................................................... 21 1.2.2.4 Precipitation changes in the 21st century ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in Its Context
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Repository of the Freie Universität Berlin Amara Thornton Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in its Context Summary This paper explores the value of social networks in the history of archaeology, combining them with biography and prosopography to produce a practical method for examining the development of the discipline, and an alternative to the traditional history of archaeology narrative. It presents broad categories for the interpretation and visualization of social net- works, illuminated by case studies focusing on linked political and archaeological networks in early British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Social networks are a tool for under- standing the historical context of archaeological work, and can be utilized to explore the role of men and women, politicians, soldiers, artists, architects, funders and others, in the excavation, interpretation, presentation and reception of archaeology. Keywords: Archaeology; social networks; biography; prosopography; history; British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Der Artikel untersucht die Bedeutung von sozialen Netzwerken in der Geschichte der Ar- chäologie. Im Rückgriff auf biographische und prosopographische Ansätze soll eine geeig- nete Methode zur Untersuchung der Entwicklung des Fachs herausgearbeitet werden und eine Alternative zu den traditionellen Erzählungen in der Archäologiegeschichte. Anhand einer Fallstudie über die miteinander verbundenen politischen und archäologischen Netz- werke in den frühen britischen Mandaten Palästina und Transjordanien werden allgemeine Kategorien für die Interpretation und Visualisierung von sozialen Netzwerken diskutiert. Die Analyse sozialer Netzwerke gibt Einblick in den historischen Kontext archäologischer Arbeit und erlaubt es, die Rollen von Männern und Frauen, Politikern, Soldaten, Künstlern, Architekten und Sponsoren bei der Ausgrabung, Interpretation, Präsentation und Rezepti- on von Archäologie zu untersuchen.
    [Show full text]
  • 07.07.25 YBDP PF2.Indd
    IME MIN PR IS . T R R . Y T S T N A O T I E T P SPO A Z LA I N AN NING ORG T. R. PRIME MINISTRY STATE PLANNING ORGANIZATION General Directorate of Regional Development and Structural Adjustment YEŞİLIRMAK BASIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (AMASYA, ÇORUM, SAMSUN, TOKAT) PREFEASIBILITIES “An environmentally sensitive, competitive, rapidly developing region, which has become Turkey’s gateway to the Black Sea and which has raised its quality of life” DOLSAR Engineering Limited October 2006 Ankara Y E Ş İ L I R M A K B A S I N D E V E L O P M E N T P R O J E C T Published: Ankara, 2006 DOLSAR DOLSAR P R E F E A S I B I L I T E S S I B L A R E F P MEMBERS OF ACCEPTANCE COMMITTEE, GUIDANCE AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE OF THE YEŞİLIRMAK BASIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND CONTRIBUTORS FROM STATE PLANNING ORGANIZATION* ACCEPTANCE COMMITTEE Ahmet YAMAN General Director of Regional Development and Structural Adjustment Cevdet YILMAZ General Director of Relations with EU Mehmet ÇIRAK Head of Monitoring and Evaluation Department Ömer BİLEN Head of Monitoring and Evaluation Department Dr. Cahit BAĞCI Undersecretariat Advisor MEMBERS OF GUIDANCE AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE (CONTROL ORGANIZATION) Cemalettin KAYMAK Head of Priority Regions for Development Department Nevin SORGUÇ Head of Regional Development Department Deniz AKKAHVE Head of EU Regional Development Programs Department Cumhur BOZ Head of State Economic Enterprises and Social Security Department Ayşenur GÖNÜL Head of Financial Markets Department Ahmet ÇELENKOĞLU Head of Economic Evaluation Department Aziz BABACAN Head of Agriculture Department Mehmet TARAKÇIOĞLU Head of Agriculture Department Murat Ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Egovernment in Turkey
    Country Profile History Strategy Legal Framework Actors Who’s Who Infrastructure Services for Citizens Services for Businesses INSIDE WHAT’S eGovernment in Turkey ISA Visit the e-Government factsheets online on Joinup.eu Joinup is a collaborative platform created by the European Commission under the Interoperability Solutions for Public Administrations (ISA) in Europe Programme. Joinup provides numerous services around 3 main functionalities: 1. An observatory on interoperability, e-government, e-inclusion and e-health 2. A collaborative platform of open communities 3. A repository of interoperability solutions This document is meant to present an overview of the eGoverment status in this country and not to be exhaustive in its references and analysis. Even though every possible care has been taken by the authors to refer to and use valid data from authentic sources, the European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the included information, nor does it accept any responsibility for any use thereof. Cover picture © Fotolia Content © European Commission © European Union, 2015 January 2010 Edition 13.0 eGovernment in Turkey, January 2015, Edition 12.0 Country Profile ......................................................................................... 1 eGovernment History ............................................................................... 5 eGovernment Strategy ........................................................................... 18 eGovernment Legal Framework ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpture and Inscriptions from the Monumental Entrance to the Palatial Complex at Kerkenes DAĞ, Turkey Oi.Uchicago.Edu Ii
    oi.uchicago.edu i KERKENES SPECIAL STUDIES 1 SCULPTURE AND INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE MONUMENTAL ENTRANCE TO THE PALATIAL COMPLEX AT KERKENES DAĞ, TURKEY oi.uchicago.edu ii Overlooking the Ancient City on the Kerkenes Dağ from the Northwest. The Palatial Complex is Located at the Center of the Horizon Just to the Right of the Kale oi.uchicago.edu iii KERKENES SPECIAL STUDIES 1 SCULPTURE AND INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE MONUMENTAL ENTRANCE TO THE PALATIAL COMPLEX AT KERKENES DAĞ, TURKEY by CatheRiNe M. DRAyCOTT and GeOffRey D. SuMMeRS with contribution by CLAUDE BRIXHE and Turkish summary translated by G. B∫KE YAZICIO˝LU ORieNTAL iNSTiTuTe PuBLiCATiONS • VOLuMe 135 THe ORieNTAL iNSTiTuTe Of THe uNiVeRSiTy Of CHiCAGO oi.uchicago.edu iv Library of Congress Control Number: 2008926243 iSBN-10: 1-885923-57-0 iSBN-13: 978-1-885923-57-8 iSSN: 0069-3367 The Oriental Institute, Chicago ©2008 by The university of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2008. Printed in the united States of America. ORiental iNSTiTuTe PuBLicatiONS, VOLuMe 135 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. urban with the assistance of Katie L. Johnson Series Editors’ Acknowledgments The assistance of Sabahat Adil, Melissa Bilal, and Scott Branting is acknowledged in the production of this volume. Spine Illustration fragment of a Griffin’s Head (Cat. No. 3.6) Printed by Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor, Michigan The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for information Services — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSi Z39.48-1984. oi.uchicago.edu v TABLE OF CONTENTS LiST Of ABBReViatiONS ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology
    Books Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Edited by Deodato Tapete Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Geosciences www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences MDPI Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Books Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade MDPI Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete Italian Space Agency (ASI) Italy Editorial Office MDPI AG St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This edition is a reprint of the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Geosciences (ISSN 2076-3263) from 2017–2018 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences/special_issues/archaeology). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: Books Lastname, F.M.; Lastname, F.M. Article title. Journal Name Year, Article number, page range. First Edition 2018 ISBN 978-3-03842-763-6 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-764-3 (PDF) Articles in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY), which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is © 2018 MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). MDPI Table of Contents About the Special Issue Editor ..................................................................................................................... vii Preface to “Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology” ........................................................... ix Deodato Tapete Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Reprinted from: Geosciences 2018, 8(2), 41; doi: 10.3390/geosciences8020041 ......................................
    [Show full text]