DOCSLIB.ORG

Sculpture and Inscriptions from the Monumental Entrance to the Palatial Complex at Kerkenes DAĞ, Turkey Oi.Uchicago.Edu Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sculpture and Inscriptions from the Monumental Entrance to the Palatial Complex at Kerkenes DAĞ, Turkey Oi.Uchicago.Edu Ii oi.uchicago.edu i KERKENES SPECIAL STUDIES 1 SCULPTURE AND INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE MONUMENTAL ENTRANCE TO THE PALATIAL COMPLEX AT KERKENES DAĞ, TURKEY oi.uchicago.edu ii Overlooking the Ancient City on the Kerkenes Dağ from the Northwest. The Palatial Complex is Located at the Center of the Horizon Just to the Right of the Kale oi.uchicago.edu iii KERKENES SPECIAL STUDIES 1 SCULPTURE AND INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE MONUMENTAL ENTRANCE TO THE PALATIAL COMPLEX AT KERKENES DAĞ, TURKEY by CatheRiNe M. DRAyCOTT and GeOffRey D. SuMMeRS with contribution by CLAUDE BRIXHE and Turkish summary translated by G. B∫KE YAZICIO˝LU ORieNTAL iNSTiTuTe PuBLiCATiONS • VOLuMe 135 THe ORieNTAL iNSTiTuTe Of THe uNiVeRSiTy Of CHiCAGO oi.uchicago.edu iv Library of Congress Control Number: 2008926243 iSBN-10: 1-885923-57-0 iSBN-13: 978-1-885923-57-8 iSSN: 0069-3367 The Oriental Institute, Chicago ©2008 by The university of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2008. Printed in the united States of America. ORiental iNSTiTuTe PuBLicatiONS, VOLuMe 135 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. urban with the assistance of Katie L. Johnson Series Editors’ Acknowledgments The assistance of Sabahat Adil, Melissa Bilal, and Scott Branting is acknowledged in the production of this volume. Spine Illustration fragment of a Griffin’s Head (Cat. No. 3.6) Printed by Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor, Michigan The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for information Services — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSi Z39.48-1984. oi.uchicago.edu v TABLE OF CONTENTS LiST Of ABBReViatiONS ............................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF PLATES ............................................................................................................................................. ix PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................................... xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................. xv BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................................................................................................................................. xvii DiSCOVeRy Of SCuLPTuRe AND iNSCRiPTiONS. Geoffrey D. Summers ................................................. 1 CATALOG ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 SCULPTURE (CAT . NOS. 1–10). Catherine M. Draycott .............................................................................. 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Statuary (Cat. Nos. 1–2) ....................................................................................................................... 10 Catalog No. 1. Statue of Draped figure ......................................................................................... 10 Catalog No. 2. fragment from Head of Lion Statue ....................................................................... 21 Small Reliefs (Cat. Nos. 3–8) ............................................................................................................... 24 Catalog No. 3. Small Reliefs from a Block .................................................................................... 24 Catalog No. 4. Rosette ................................................................................................................... 54 Catalog No. 5. Single Rosette Petal ............................................................................................... 55 Catalog No. 6. Curved Molding ..................................................................................................... 55 Catalog No. 7. fragments with Curved Molding on Background.................................................... 55 Catalog No. 8. fragment from Molding(?) ..................................................................................... 56 Miscellaneous Sculpture (Cat. Nos. 9–10) ............................................................................................ 56 Catalog No. 9. fragment from Statue of Bird of Prey .................................................................... 56 Catalog No. 10. Possible Relief of Lion Tail(?) .............................................................................. 58 Summary and Comments ...................................................................................................................... 58 ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS (CAT . NOS. 11–12). Geoffrey D. Summers .................................................... 61 introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 61 Catalog No. 11. Stepped Slab or Base ............................................................................................ 62 Catalog No. 12. Bolster Slab .......................................................................................................... 63 Tentative Comments on the Original Composition of the Sculpted and inscribed Monument ................ 65 InsCRIPTION FRAGMENTS (CAT . NOS. 13–20). Catherine M. Draycott after Claude Brixhe....................... 67 Catalog No. 13. inscription fragment i .......................................................................................... 67 Catalog No. 14. inscription fragment ii ........................................................................................ 67 Catalog No. 15. inscription fragment iii ....................................................................................... 68 Catalog No. 16. inscription fragments iV and X .......................................................................... 68 Catalog No. 17. inscription fragment V......................................................................................... 69 Catalog No. 18. inscription fragments Vi and Vii ......................................................................... 69 Catalog No. 19. inscription fragment Viii..................................................................................... 70 Catalog No. 20. inscription fragment iX ....................................................................................... 70 v oi.uchicago.edu vi TABLE OF CONTENTS THe PHRyGiAN iNSCRiPTiONS. Claude Brixhe, translated by Catherine M. Draycott ................................ 71 CONCORDANCe Of iNVentory AND Catalog NuMBeRS .................................................................. 77 INDEX OF PLACE NAMES ............................................................................................................................. 81 TüRKçe ÖZeT. Translated by G. Bike Yazıcıoğlu............................................................................................ 83 PLATES oi.uchicago.edu vii LiST Of ABBReViatiONS arc architectural elements ca. circa, approximately cat(s). catalog(s) cf. confer, compare cm centimeter(s) CT Clearance Trench e.g. exempli gratia, for example et al. et alii, and others etc. et cetera, and so forth fig(s). figure(s) GPS Global Positioning System iD identification Number(s) ibid. ibidem, in the same place i.e. id est, that is K Kerkenes number METU Middle East Technical University mm millimeter(s) m meter(s) n(n). footnote(s) no(s). number(s) pers. comm. personal communication pl(s). plate(s) stn stone STT Schmidt Test Trench TR Trench TT Test Trench vol. volume vii oi.uchicago.edu viii oi.uchicago.edu ix LIST OF PLATES frontispiece. Overlooking the Ancient City on the Kerkenes Dağ from the Northwest 1. Map of Anatolia and Adjacent Regions Showing Sites Mentioned in the Text; entire iron Age City on Kerkenes Dağ, Seen from Manned Hot-air Balloon 2. Triangulated irregular Network (TiN) Simulation of the City Made in ArcView 3D Analyst from 1,400,000 GPS Readings 3. Plan of Monumental entrance to Palatial Complex, Showing Locations of Trenches 4. Plan of Monumental entrance to Palatial Complex 5. Plan of eastern end of Palatial Complex 6. Trench 11 from east in early Stages of excavation in 2003, with Part of Trench 1 in foreground; and Mass of Burnt and fused Superstructure fallen into Doorway through Wooden facade, figure Crouches on Burnt earth floor of Room on far Side of facade 7. Front Portion of entrance, Looking east at end of 2005 Season; in foreground is Rubble Base of foundation Trench for Timber facade, five Large Pavers Mark Position of Wide, Double Doorway with Sandstone Plinth on Right; and Rear of entrance, Looking South, with Rubble-filled foundation Slot and Later Pits, Not fully emptied; in foreground, Disturbed Column Base. fallen Aniconic Stele in Center, Drain at Right, and Burnt earthen floor of Room in Central Section at Left 8. Trench 11 and Part of Trench 1 at end of 2003 Season; and Looking Westward through Monumental entrance at end of 2005 Season 9. South Tower-like Platform with figure by Corner; and Sandstone Column Base by front of South Tower-like Platform 10. Rear of entrance, Looking South, Drain Just behind figures with Disturbed Column Base at Left; and Stone fallen from South Tower-like Platform 11. Ornamented Architectural Blocks fallen from Corner of South Tower-like
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Diplomatic Missions in Turkey
    GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS IN TURKEY 1 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs http://www.mfa.gov.tr PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1. GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Diplomatic Missions ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Consular Posts ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 International Organizations ................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Family Members ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Turkish Nationals .................................................................................................................... 8 2. PROTOCOL PROCEDURES FOR THE ARRIVAL OF MEMBERS OF STAFF AT DIPLOMATIC/CONSULAR MISSONS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................... 8 2.1 Notification of Arrival ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Identity (ID) Cards ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Family Members ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Minutes: Election of Officers: Sarah
    BAKER CITY PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION APPROVED MINUTES July 9, 2019 ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 5:40 p.m. Present were: Ann Mehaffy, Lynette Perry, Corrine Vetger, Kate Reid, Fred Warner, Jr., Robin Nudd and guest Dean Reganess. APPROVAL OF Lynette moved to approve the June minutes as presented. Corrine MINUTES: seconded the motion. Motion carried. ELECTION OF Ann questioned if she and Corrine could serve as co-chairs. Robin OFFICERS: would check into it and let them know at next meeting. SARAH FRY PROJECT Ann reported that the pieces were being stored in the basement at UPDATE: City Hall. Ann would check with Molly to see if she had heard back on timeline for repairs to brickwork at the Corner Brick building. ART ON LOAN: Corrine stated that she would reach out to Shawn. SHAWN PETERSON PROJECT UPDATE: VINYL WRAP Nothing new to report on the project with ODOT. UPDATE: OTHER BUSINESS: Dean Reganess was present and visited with group regarding his trade: stone masonry. Dean is a third generation stone mason and had recently relocated to Baker City. Dean announced that he wanted to offer his help in the community and discussed creating a large community stone sculpture that could be pinned together. Dean also discussed stone benches with an estimated cost of $1200/each. Dean mentioned that a film crew would be coming from San Antonio and thought the exposure might be good for Baker. Corrine questioned if Dean had ideas to help the Public Arts Commission raise funds for public art. Dean mentioned that he would be willing to create a mold/casting of something that depicted Baker and it could be recreated and sold to raise funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka Lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands: Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages Gander, Max DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2014-0039 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-119374 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Gander, Max (2014). Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands: Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages. Klio. Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte, 96(2):369-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2014-0039 Klio 2014; 96(2): 369–415 Max Gander Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages Summary: The present article contains observations on the invasion of Lycia by the Hittite king Tudhaliya IV as described in the Yalburt inscription. The author questions the commonly found identification of the land of VITIS/Wiyanwanda with the city of Oinoanda on account of the problems raised by the reading of the sign VITIS as well as of archaeological and strategical observations. With the aid of Lycian and Greek inscriptions the author argues that the original Wiya- nawanda/Oinoanda was located further south than the city commonly known as Oinoanda situated above İncealiler. These insights lead to a reassessment of the Hittite-Luwian sources concerning the conquest of Lycia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Çakirlar, Canan; Marston, John
    University of Groningen Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Çakirlar, Canan; Marston, John Published in: Environmental Archaeology DOI: 10.1080/14614103.2017.1385890 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2019 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Çakirlar, C., & Marston, J. (2019). Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey). Environmental Archaeology, 24(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2017.1385890 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 25-09-2021 Environmental Archaeology The Journal of Human Palaeoecology ISSN: 1461-4103 (Print) 1749-6314 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yenv20 Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Canan Çakırlar & John M.
    [Show full text]
  • CILICIA: the FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES in ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson
    CILICIA: THE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES IN ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson Summary This article explores the origin of the Christian church in Anatolia. While individual believers undoubtedly entered Anatolia during the 30s after the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:9–10), the book of Acts suggests that it was not until the following decade that the first church was organized. For it was at Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria, that the first Christians appeared (Acts 11:20–26). Yet two obscure references in Acts point to the organization of churches in Cilicia at an earlier date. Among the addressees of the letter drafted by the Jerusalem council were the churches in Cilicia (Acts 15:23). Later Paul visited these same churches at the beginning of his second ministry journey (Acts 15:41). Paul’s relationship to these churches points to this apostle as their founder. Since his home was the Cilician city of Tarsus, to which he returned after his conversion (Gal. 1:21; Acts 9:30), Paul was apparently active in church planting during his so-called ‘silent years’. The core of these churches undoubtedly consisted of Diaspora Jews who, like Paul’s family, lived in the region. Jews from Cilicia were members of a Synagogue of the Freedmen in Jerusalem, to which Paul was associated during his time in Jerusalem (Acts 6:9). Antiochus IV (175–164 BC) hellenized and urbanized Cilicia during his reign; the Romans around 39 BC added Cilicia Pedias to the province of Syria. Four cities along with Tarsus, located along or near the Pilgrim Road that transects Anatolia, constitute the most likely sites for the Cilician churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpture Northwest Nov/Dec 2015 Ssociation a Nside: I “Conversations” Why Do You Carve? Barbara Davidson Bill Weissinger Doug Wiltshire Victor Picou Culptors
    Sculpture NorthWest Nov/Dec 2015 ssociation A nside: I “Conversations” Why Do You Carve? Barbara Davidson Bill Weissinger Doug Wiltshire Victor Picou culptors S Stone Carving Videos “Threshold” Public Art by: Brian Goldbloom tone S est W t Brian Goldbloom: orth ‘Threshold’ (Detail, one of four Vine Maple column wraps), 8 feet high and 14 N inches thick, Granite Sculpture NorthWest is published every two months by NWSSA, NorthWest Stone Sculptors Association, a In This Issue Washington State Non-Profit Professional Organization. Letter From The President ... 3 CONTACT P.O. Box 27364 • Seattle, WA 98165-1864 FAX: (206) 523-9280 Letter From The Editors ... 3 Website: www.nwssa.org General e-mail: [email protected] “Conversations”: Why Do We Carve? ... 4 NWSSA BOARD OFFICERS Carl Nelson, President, (425) 252-6812 Ken Barnes, Vice President, (206) 328-5888 Michael Yeaman, Treasurer, (360) 376-7004 Verena Schwippert, Secretary, (360) 435-8849 NWSSA BOARD Pat Barton, (425) 643-0756 Rick Johnson, (360) 379-9498 Ben Mefford, (425) 943-0215 Steve Sandry, (425) 830-1552 Doug Wiltshire, (503) 890-0749 PRODUCTION STAFF Penelope Crittenden, Co-editor, (541) 324-8375 Lane Tompkins, Co-editor, (360) 320-8597 Stone Carving Videos ... 6 DESIGNER AND PRINTER Nannette Davis of QIVU Graphics, (425) 485-5570 WEBMASTER Carl Nelson [email protected] 425-252-6812 Membership...................................................$45/yr. Subscription (only)........................................$30/yr. ‘Threshold’, Public Art by Brian Goldbloom ... 10 Please Note: Only full memberships at $45/yr. include voting privileges and discounted member rates at symposia and workshops. MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the NWSSA’s Sculpture NorthWest Journal is to promote, educate, and inform about stone sculpture, and to share experiences in the appreciation and execution of stone sculpture.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interpretation of Some Unpublished in Situ and Recorded Rum Seljuk 13Th C. External and Internal Figural Relief Work on the Belkıs (Aspendos) Palace, Antalya
    GEPHYRA 8 2011 143–184 Terrance Michael Patrick DUGGAN An interpretation of some unpublished in situ and recorded Rum Seljuk 13th c. external and internal figural relief work on the Belkıs (Aspendos) Palace, Antalya Abstract: This article is divided into four parts. Firstly, it notes the precedent provided by the conversion of the Roman theatre at Bosra in Syria into an Ayyubid Palace, for the conversion of the Roman theater into the Rum Seljuk palace at Belkis–Aspendos and the known extensive use made of Syrian trained architects for important architectural projects by Rum Seljuk Sul- tans in the first half of the 13th c. Secondly, the two bands of Seljuk low relief depictions of fe- lines and a deer on a series of re–carved Roman limestone blocks on the exterior wall by the door leading to the southern köşk–pavilion erected above the parados and upon the lintel over this door, discovered by the author in 2007, extending over a length of nearly 10 m are de- scribed and the deliberate pecking of the surface of these low relief depictions it is suggested, was to provide bonding for applied painted stucco carved relief–work that completed this relief work on the exterior palace facade. The third section describes the painted Seljuk tympanum relief sculpture made of stucco plaster that concealed the Roman relief carving of Dionysus in the pediment of the sceanae frons in the 13th c. A sculptural relief depiction of a nude female figure which was fortunately recorded by Charles Texier early in the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Yayını Görüntülemek Için Tıklayın
    Prof. Sir John Boardman Sir John Boardman’ın 90. Yaşı Onuruna In Honour of Sir John Boardman on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology Sayı: 20 Volume: 20 2017 TÜBA-AR TÜBA Arkeoloji (TÜBA-AR) Dergisi TÜBA-AR uluslararası hakemli bir TÜRKİYE BİLİMLER AKADEMİSİ ARKEOLOJİ DERGİSİ dergi olup TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM (SBVT) ve Avrupa İnsani Bilimler Referans TÜBA-AR, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi (TÜBA) tarafından yıllık olarak yayın- İndeksi (ERIH PLUS) veritabanlarında lanan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir. Derginin yayın politikası, kapsamı ve taranmaktadır. içeriği ile ilgili kararlar, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Konseyi tarafından belir- lenen Yayın Kurulu tarafından alınır. TÜBA Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) TÜBA-AR is an international refereed DERGİNİN KAPSAMI VE YAYIN İLKELERİ journal and indexed in the TUBİTAK ULAKBİM (SBVT) and The European TÜBA-AR dergisi ilke olarak, dönem ve coğrafi bölge sınırlaması olmadan Reference Index for the Humanities arkeoloji ve arkeoloji ile bağlantılı tüm alanlarda yapılan yeni araştırma, yo- and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS) databases. rum, değerlendirme ve yöntemleri kapsamaktadır. Dergi arkeoloji alanında yeni yapılan çalışmalara yer vermenin yanı sıra, bir bilim akademisi yayın organı Sahibi / Owner: olarak, arkeoloji ile bağlantılı olmak koşuluyla, sosyal bilimlerin tüm uzmanlık Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi adına Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevat ACAR alanlarına açıktır; bu alanlarda gelişen yeni yorum, yaklaşım, analizlere yer veren (Başkan / President) bir forum oluşturma işlevini de yüklenmiştir. Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Dergi, arkeoloji ile ilgili yeni açılımları kapsamlı olarak ele almak için belirli Managing Editor bir konuya odaklanmış yazıları “dosya” şeklinde kapsamına alabilir; bu amaçla Prof.
    [Show full text]