DOCSLIB.ORG

Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Books Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Edited by Deodato Tapete Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Geosciences www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences MDPI Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Books Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade MDPI Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete Italian Space Agency (ASI) Italy Editorial Office MDPI AG St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This edition is a reprint of the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Geosciences (ISSN 2076-3263) from 2017–2018 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences/special_issues/archaeology). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: Books Lastname, F.M.; Lastname, F.M. Article title. Journal Name Year, Article number, page range. First Edition 2018 ISBN 978-3-03842-763-6 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-764-3 (PDF) Articles in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY), which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is © 2018 MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). MDPI Table of Contents About the Special Issue Editor ..................................................................................................................... vii Preface to “Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology” ........................................................... ix Deodato Tapete Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Reprinted from: Geosciences 2018, 8(2), 41; doi: 10.3390/geosciences8020041 ....................................... 1 Michael Danti, Scott Branting and Susan Penacho The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 95; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040095 ....................................... 11 Louise Rayne, Jennie Bradbury, David Mattingly, Graham Philip, Robert Bewley and Andrew Wilson From Above and on the Ground: Geospatial Methods for Recording Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 100; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040100 ..................................... 32 Julia M. Chyla How Can Remote Sensing Help in Detecting the Threats to Archaeological Sites in Upper Egypt? Books Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 97; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040097 ....................................... 63 Sarah Parcak, Gregory Mumford and Chase Childs Using Open Access Satellite Data Alongside Ground Based Remote Sensing: An Assessment, with Case Studies from Egypt’s Delta Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 94; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040094 ....................................... 75 Athos Agapiou, Vasiliki Lysandrou and Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis Optical Remote Sensing Potentials for Looting Detection Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 98; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040098 ....................................... 99 Eva Savina Malinverni, Roberto Pierdicca, Carlo Alberto Bozzi, Francesca Colosi and Roberto Orazi Analysis and Processing of Nadir and Stereo VHR Pleiadés Images for 3D Mapping and Planning the Land of Nineveh, Iraqi Kurdistan Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 80; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030080 ....................................... 116 Geert J. Verhoeven Are We There Yet? A Review and Assessment of Archaeological Passive Airborne Optical Imaging Approaches in the Light of Landscape Archaeology Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 86; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030086 ....................................... 134 iii MDPI Martin Gade, Jörn Kohlus and Cornelia Kost SAR Imaging of Archaeological Sites on Intertidal Flats in the German Wadden Sea Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 105; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040105 ..................................... 167 Susanne Rutishauser, Stefan Erasmi, Ralph Rosenbauer and Ralf Buchbach SARchaeology—Detecting Palaeochannels Based on High Resolution Radar Data and Their Impact of Changes in the Settlement Pattern in Cilicia (Turkey) Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 109; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040109 ..................................... 181 Douglas C. Comer, Bruce D. Chapman and Jacob A. Comer Detecting Landscape Disturbance at the Nasca Lines Using SAR Data Collected from Airborne and Satellite Platforms Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 106; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040106 ..................................... 201 Till F. Sonnemann, Douglas C. Comer, Jesse L. Patsolic, William P. Megarry, Eduardo Herrera Malatesta and Corinne L. Hofman Semi-Automatic Detection of Indigenous Settlement Features on Hispaniola through Remote Sensing Data Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 127; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040127 ..................................... 220 Arianna Traviglia and Andrea Torsello Landscape Pattern Detection in Archaeological Remote Sensing Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 128; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040128 ..................................... 235 Lev Eppelbaum Books Quantitative Examination of Piezoelectric/Seismoelectric Anomalies from Near-Surface Targets Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 90; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030090 ....................................... 251 Ekhine Garcia-Garcia, James Andrews, Eneko Iriarte, Roger Sala, Arantza Aranburu, Julian Hill and Juantxo Agirre-Mauleon Geoarchaeological Core Prospection as a Tool to Validate Archaeological Interpretation Based on Geophysical Data at the Roman Settlement of Auritz/Burguete and Aurizberri/Espinal (Navarre) Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 104; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040104 ..................................... 263 Roman Křivánek Comparison Study to the Use of Geophysical Methods at Archaeological Sites Observed by Various Remote Sensing Techniques in the Czech Republic Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 81; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030081 ....................................... 282 Athos Agapiou, Vasiliki Lysandrou, Apostolos Sarris, Nikos Papadopoulos and Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis Fusion of Satellite Multispectral Images Based on Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Data for the Investigation of Buried Concealed Archaeological Remains Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(2), 40; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7020040 ....................................... 296 Tuna Kalayci, François-Xavier Simon and Apostolos Sarris A Manifold Approach for the Investigation of Early and Middle Neolithic Settlements in Thessaly, Greece Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 79; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030079 ......................................... 315 iv MDPI Juan Corso, Josep Roca and Felipe Buill Geometric Analysis on Stone Façades with Terrestrial Laser Scanner Technology Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 103; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040103 ..................................... 339 Gabriele Guidi, Sara Gonizzi Barsanti, Laura Loredana Micoli and Umair Shafqat Malik Accurate Reconstruction of the Roman Circus in Milan by Georeferencing Heterogeneous Data Sources with GIS Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 91; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7030091 ....................................... 351 Florent Poux, Romain Neuville, Line Van Wersch, Gilles-Antoine Nys and Roland Billen 3D Point Clouds in Archaeology: Advances in Acquisition, Processing and Knowledge Integration Applied to Quasi-Planar Objects Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 96; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040096 ....................................... 369 Pierre Drap, Odile Papini, Elisa Pruno, Micchele Nucciotti and Guido Vannini Ontology-Based Photogrammetry Survey for Medieval Archaeology: Toward a 3D Geographic Information System (GIS) Reprinted from: Geosciences 2017, 7(4), 93; doi: 10.3390/geosciences7040093 ....................................... 401 Books v MDPI Books MDPI About the Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete is a Researcher in Earth Observation in the Scientific Research Division of the Italian Space Agency (ASI). With more than 10 years of research experience in Earth Sciences and Remote Sensing applied to the study and conservation of cultural heritage, Dr Tapete is specialized in Synthetic Aperture Radar imaging and interferometry for deformation monitoring, hazard assessment and archaeological prospection. His publications in top-ranked journals (e.g., Remote Sensing of Environment and Journal of Archaeological Science) are highly cited across the community. He has led projects focused on advanced technologies to study renowned UNESCO World Heritage Sites, including the historic centers of Rome, Florence and Naples in Italy, Valletta in Malta, the Complex of Koguryo Tombs in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa and the Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu in Peru. He is a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (FHEA). Books vii MDPI Books MDPI Preface to “Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology” The use of remote sensing techniques, by means of either ground-based instrumentations or airborne or space-borne sensors, for archaeological studies, namely, archaeological remote sensing, already
Recommended publications
  • The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch

    The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch

    1 The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context *See page 4 for citation. Julian Hirsch 2 Acknowledgements In some ways the groundwork for my thesis and work on the ONESC Initiative began more than five years ago in a kitchen in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. I was meeting Dr. Elizabeth Bloch Smith for the first time and could scarcely have imagined that our meeting would lead to my participation in an archaeological excavation in Israel that summer. After my first excavation, I was hooked. The spring before I came to Oberlin was filled with weekly meetings, readings, and discussions with Liz. I learned so much in that time and appreciate her continued guidance and support. If Liz was responsible for exposing me to just how fascinating the archaeology of the southern Levant was, Dr. Jeffrey Blakely was the person who helped me find the path where I could follow my passion at Oberlin. I still have my notes from the first day of the January 2017 Winter Term. I was amazed by everything Jeff knew about the history of biblical archaeology at the college and the history of the collection. If anything inspired me throughout my work, it was hearing vivid stories from Jeff about sitting in Harry Thomas Frank’s classroom learning about archaeology. Jeff has truly been my partner at every step of the way. I’ve consulted him for advice numerous times. Jeff kindly provided invaluable suggestions that only a true veteran of the field could offer. To give credit to Jeff in two more areas, Jeff certainly inspired my interest in the history of biblical archaeology and during the Winter Term in 2017 assigned me to work on the Bab edh-Dhra’ collection of Early Bronze Age tomb pots.
  • Unifying Spatial and Temporal Methodologies to Understand Archaeological Looting in Egypt

    Unifying Spatial and Temporal Methodologies to Understand Archaeological Looting in Egypt

    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BUILDING A BASELINE: UNIFYING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL METHODOLOGIES TO UNDERSTAND ARCHAEOLOGICAL LOOTING IN EGYPT Michelle R.D. Fabiani, Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Dissertation directed by: Dr. Laura Dugan, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Archaeological looting – the illegal excavation or removal of an antiquity from the ground or structural complex of an archaeological site – is a persistent issue in many countries. National and international laws, agreements, conventions, and statutes all proscribe the looting transporting, possession, and sale of antiquities illegally removed from archaeological sites. Looting has also generated a lot of academic attention, with scholarship developing in archaeology, sociology, criminology, and law (among others). Despite such legal proscriptions and scholarly contributions to understanding this phenomenon, current efforts have been unable to produce tangible solutions for preventing this crime. Not only has there not yet been extensive scholarship to understand the link between looting and contextual forces, there is a dearth of research on the most effective ways to study these interconnected variables. Using a framework of routine activity theory, this dissertation proposes a new possible approach that considers spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal relationships to establish baseline data on patterns of archaeological looting attempts in Lower Egypt from 2015 to 2017 relative to sociopolitical, economic, and environmental stress — and to begin to address this research gap. Specifically, this dissertation proposes a methodology for collecting and coding data on archaeological looting attempts from satellite imagery. It then applies a series of spatial (clustering, proximity), temporal (SEM, VAR, ARDL), and spatio-temporal methods (clustering, hot spots analysis, spatial time series) to these data to demonstrate the importance of analyzing this phenomena multidimensionally.
  • Evaluating the Risk to Ramsar Sites from Climate Change Induced Sea

    Evaluating the Risk to Ramsar Sites from Climate Change Induced Sea

    STRP Scientific and Technical Briefing Note Review Panel Number 5, December 2012 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands Purpose of this BN Evaluating the risk to Ramsar Sites from To provide a preliminary as- climate change induced sea level rise sessment of coastal Ramsar Sites that are at risk to inunda- his Briefing Note and the accompanying web map service and data tion as a consequence of sea Tsets, developed by the Center for International Earth Science Infor- level rise, in order to provide mation Network (CIESIN) of Columbia University, provide a preliminary site managers with information that may assist them in assess- assessment of the risk to coastal wetlands designated as Wetlands of ing adaptation strategies. International Importance (Ramsar Sites) under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands from rising sea levels due to climate change. Two scenarios are evaluated, 0-1 meter sea level rise (SLR), which is close to what the Background information Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts for this cen- tury, and 0-2 meter SLR, which is an upper bound for SLR in this century CIESIN, through its NASA- if land-based ice sheets respond faster than expected to temperature supported Socioeconomic changes (AMAP 2011, Pfeffer et al. 2008). It has to be recognized that Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), conducted a glo- sea level rise will not be consistent globally, but is affected by coastal bal analysis of Ramsar Sites bathymetry and local topography and tides, while the extent of areas and developed this report in periodically submerged will also be affected by storm surges (Strauss et response to a request by the al.
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
  • The Cradle of Pyramids.Wps

    The Cradle of Pyramids.Wps

    The cradle of pyramids in satellite images Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy We propose the use of image processing to enhance the Google Maps of some archaeological areas of Egypt. In particular we analyse that place which is considered the cradle of pyramids, where it was announced the discovery of a new pyramid by means of an infrared remote sensing. Saqqara and Dahshur are burial places of the ancient Egypt. Saqqara was the necropolis of Memphis, the ancient capital of the Lower Egypt. This place has many pyramids, including the well-known step pyramid of Djoser, and several mastabas. As told in Wikipedia, 16 Egyptian kings built pyramids there and the high officials added their tombs during the entire pharaonic period [1]. The necropolis remained an important complex for non-royal burials and cult ceremonies till the Roman times. Dahshur is another royal necropolis located in the desert on the west bank of the Nile [2]. The place is well-known for several pyramids, two of which are among the oldest and best preserved in Egypt. Therefore this site can be properly considered as the cradle of Egyptian pyramids [3]. Figure 1 shows the Djoser pyramid and the Great Enclosure at Saqqara. The two images have been obtained from Google Maps after an image processing with two programs, AstroFracTool, based on the calculus of the fractional gradient, and the wavelet filtering of Iris, as discussed in Ref.4. The reader can compare the images with the original Google Maps, using the coordinates given in the figure [5].
  • The Geoglyphs of Har Karkom (Negev, Israel): Classification and Interpretation

    The Geoglyphs of Har Karkom (Negev, Israel): Classification and Interpretation

    PAPERS XXIV Valcamonica Symposium 2011 THE GEOGLYPHS OF HAR KARKOM (NEGEV, ISRAEL): CLASSIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION Federico Mailland* Abstract - The geoglyphs of Har Karkom (Negev, Israel): classification and interpretation There is a debate on the possible interpretation of geoglyphs as a form of art, less durable than rock engravings, picture or sculpture. Also, there is a debate on how to date the geoglyphs, though some methods have been proposed. Har Karkom is a rocky mountain, a mesa in the middle of what today is a desert, a holy mountain which was worshipped in the prehis- tory. The flat conformation of the plateau and the fact that it was forbidden to the peoples during several millennia allowed the preservation of several geoglyphs on its flat ground. The geoglyphs of Har Karkom are drawings made on the surface by using pebbles or by cleaning certain areas of stones and other surface rough features. Some of the drawings are over 30 m long. The area of Har Karkom plateau and the southern Wadi Karkom was surveyed and zenithal pictures were taken by means of a balloon with a hanging digital camera. The aerial survey of Har Karkom plateau has reviewed the presence of about 25 geoglyph sites concentrated in a limited area of no more than 4 square km, which is considered to have been a sacred area at the time the geoglyphs were produced and defines one of the major world concentrations of this kind of art. The possible presence among the depictions of large mammals, such as elephant and rhino, already extinct in the area since late Pleistocene, may imply a Palaeolithic dating for some of the pebble drawings, which would make them the oldest pebble drawings known so far.
  • The United States and the International Efforts Against Looting of Antiquities

    The United States and the International Efforts Against Looting of Antiquities

    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers Faculty Scholarship 2-19-2009 Protecting against Plunder: The nitU ed States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities Asif Efrat Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers Part of the Arts and Entertainment Commons, Commercial Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the International Trade Commons Recommended Citation Efrat, Asif, "Protecting against Plunder: The nitU ed States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities" (2009). Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers. Paper 47. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers/47 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting against Plunder The United States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities Asif Efrat ∗∗∗ Word Count: 21,297 Abstract. In 1970 UNESCO adopted a convention intended to stem the flow of looted antiquities from developing countries to collections in art-importing countries. The majority of art-importing countries, including Britain, Germany, and Japan, refused to join the Convention. Contrary to other art-importing countries, and reversing its own traditionally-liberal policy, the United States accepted the international regulation of antiquities and joined the UNESCO Convention. The article seeks to explain why the United States chose to establish controls on antiquities, to the benefit of foreign countries facing archaeological plunder and to the detriment of the US art market.
  • Download Brodie Regulation Perspectives.Pdf

    Download Brodie Regulation Perspectives.Pdf

    Historical and Social Perspectives on the Regulation of the International Trade in Archaeological Objects: The Examples of Greece and India Neil Brodie* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................ .. 1051 11. REGULATION AT THE SOURCE OF THE ARTIFACT .......... 1054 A. Example 1: The Greek Cycladic Islands .......... .. 1056 B. Example 2: India .............................................. .. 1059 111. DISCUSSION .................................................................. 1062 I. INTRODUCTION It is a well-established fact that the international antiquities market is responsible for the destruction and vandalism of archaeological and cultural sites worldwide.1 Material removed from these sites is traded across jurisdictions until it can be sold legally and acquired as "art" by private and institutional collectors in North America, Europe and, increasingly, East Asia.2 One consequence of this trade is that most countries outside the United States have now passed laws that protect archaeological heritage by proscribing the unauthorized excavation of antiquities, the export of antiquities, or both.3 Opinions are divided, however, as to the effectiveness and * McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER United Kingdom 1. See e.g., ROGER ATWOOD, STEALING HISTORY: TOMB RAIDERS, SMUGGLERS, AND THE LOOTING OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 11, 241 (2004); NEIL J. BRODIE ET AL., STEALING HISTORY: THE ILLICIT TRADE IN CULTURAL MATERIAL 8 (2000); PATRICK J. O'KEEFE, TRADE IN ANTIQUITIES: REDUCING DESTRUCTION AND THEFT 14-16 (1997). 2. BRODIE ET AL., supra note 1, at 33. 3. See 3 LYNDEL V. PROTT & PATRICK J. O'KEEFE, LAw AND THE CULTURAL HERITAGE: MOVEMENT 429-530 (1989). 1051 1052 VANDERBIL T JOURNAL OF TRANSNA TlONAL LA W {VOl. 38;/051 even the desirability of such strong regulations at the source of the artifacts.4 Opponents of such regulation argue that the prohibitions deter people from declaring antiquities that are discovered by chance.
  • For Recording Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa.', Geosciences., 7 (4)

    For Recording Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa.', Geosciences., 7 (4)

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 29 September 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Rayne, L. and Bradbury, J. and Mattingly, D. and Philip, G. and Bewley, R. and Wilson, A. (2017) 'From above and on the ground : geospatial methods for recording endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa.', Geosciences., 7 (4). p. 100. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040100 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0). Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 1 Type of the Paper (Article, Review, Communication, etc.) 2
  • 1St International Eurasian Ornithology Congress

    1St International Eurasian Ornithology Congress

    1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Erdoğan, A., Turan, L., Albayrak, T. (Ed.) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya, Turkey 8-11 April 2004 Jointly organized by Akdeniz University - Antalya and Hacettepe University - Ankara i 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Ali Erdoğan, Levent Turan, Tamer Albayrak (Editorial Board) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya Turkey 8-11 April 2004 ISBN: 975-98424-0-8 Print: Sadri Grafik 2004 Antalya ii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress HONORARY PRESIDENTS (ALPHABETICALLY ORDERED) Prof. Dr. Tunçalp ÖZGEN Rector of Hacettepe University, Ankara Prof.Dr.Yaşar UÇAR Rector of Akdeniz University, Antalya CONGRESS CHAIRMAN Prof.Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Hacettepe University EXECUTİVE COMMİTTEE Prof. Dr. Ali ERDOĞAN (Chairman) Prof. Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Levent TURAN (Vice Chairman) Cengiz GÖKOĞLU (Mayor of Bogazkent ) SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS SECRETARY Tamer ALBAYRAK (Akdeniz University, Antalya) iii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Özdemir ADIZEL, (Yüzüncüyıl U. Van, Turkey ) Zafer AYAŞ, (Hacettepe U. Ankara, Turkey) Yusuf AYVAZ, (S. Demirel U. Isparta,Turkey) Walter BÄUMLER, (TU, Münich, Germany ) Franz BAIRLEIN, (Journal f.Ornithologie, Germany) Stuart BEARHOP, (University of Glasgow, UK) Einhard BEZZEL, (Falke, Germany) Mahmut BILGINER, (Ondokuz Mayıs U. Samsun, Turkey) Dan CHAMBERLAIN, (University of Stirling, UK) Ali ERDOĞAN, (Akdeniz U. Antalya, Turkey) Michael EXO, (Institut fuer Vogelforschung,
  • Anatolien - Brücke Der Kulturen Aktuelle Forschungen Und Perspektiven in Den Deutsch-Türkischen Altertumswissenschaften

    Anatolien - Brücke Der Kulturen Aktuelle Forschungen Und Perspektiven in Den Deutsch-Türkischen Altertumswissenschaften

    Anatolien - Brücke der Kulturen Aktuelle Forschungen und Perspektiven in den deutsch-türkischen Altertumswissenschaften Kültürlerin Köprüsü Anadolu Türk-Alman Eskiçağ Bilimlerinde Güncel Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve Yeni Bakış Açıları Tagungsband des Internationalen Symposiums „Anatolien – Brücke der Kulturen“ in Bonn vom 7. bis 9. Juli 2014 7-9 Temmuz 2014’te Bonn’da yapılan „Kültürlerin Köprüsü Anadolu“ konulu uluslararası sempozyum kitabı Herausgeber / Editör: Ünsal Yalçın & Hans-Dieter Bienert Bochum, Bonn 2015 Montanhistorische Zeitschrift Titelbild / Kapak Resmi Der ANSCHNITT. Beiheft 27 Göbekli Tepe: = Veröffentlichungen aus dem Deutschen Der neolithische Göbekli Tepe liegt wie eine Landmarke auf Bergbau-Museum Bochum, Nr. 203 einem langgestreckten Höhenzug als nördliche Grenze zur Har- ran-Ebene. Im Vordergrund des Bildes ist einer der monumenta- len Steinkreise (Anlage D) aus monolithischen T-förmigen Pfei- lern zu sehen (Bild: Nico Becker, DAI-Göbekli Tepe Archiv). Göbekli Tepe: Neolitik Dönem'e tarihlenen Göbekli Tepe Harran Ovası'nı kuzey- den sınırlayacak biçimde, uzunlamasına bir yükseltide, arazide bir işaret gibi durmaktadır. Fotoğrafta, ön planda T biçimli taş Diese Publikation wurde mit Mitteln der dikmelerden oluşan anıtsal dairemsi yapılardan birisi (D Yapısı) Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gedruckt. görülmektedir (Fotoğraf: Nico Becker, Alman Arkeoloji Enstitüsü- Göbekli Tepe Arşivi). Bu yayın Alman Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu'nun (DFG) maddi katkılarıyla basılmıştır. Für die Inhalte der Beiträge sind die Autoren selbst verantwortlich. DER ANSCHNITT Makalelerin içeriğinden yazarlar sorumludur. Herausgeber: Vereinigung der Freunde von Kunst und Kultur im Bergbau e.V. Vorsitzender des Vorstandes: Redaktion / Yayına Hazırlayan Prof. Dr. Karl Friedrich Jakob Ünsal Yalçın Vorsitzender des Beirats: Bergassessor Dipl.-Kfm. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Achim Middelschulte Übersetzungen / Çeviriler Geschäftsführer: H. Gönül Yalçın Museumsdirektor Prof.
  • Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in Its Context

    Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in Its Context

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Repository of the Freie Universität Berlin Amara Thornton Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in its Context Summary This paper explores the value of social networks in the history of archaeology, combining them with biography and prosopography to produce a practical method for examining the development of the discipline, and an alternative to the traditional history of archaeology narrative. It presents broad categories for the interpretation and visualization of social net- works, illuminated by case studies focusing on linked political and archaeological networks in early British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Social networks are a tool for under- standing the historical context of archaeological work, and can be utilized to explore the role of men and women, politicians, soldiers, artists, architects, funders and others, in the excavation, interpretation, presentation and reception of archaeology. Keywords: Archaeology; social networks; biography; prosopography; history; British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Der Artikel untersucht die Bedeutung von sozialen Netzwerken in der Geschichte der Ar- chäologie. Im Rückgriff auf biographische und prosopographische Ansätze soll eine geeig- nete Methode zur Untersuchung der Entwicklung des Fachs herausgearbeitet werden und eine Alternative zu den traditionellen Erzählungen in der Archäologiegeschichte. Anhand einer Fallstudie über die miteinander verbundenen politischen und archäologischen Netz- werke in den frühen britischen Mandaten Palästina und Transjordanien werden allgemeine Kategorien für die Interpretation und Visualisierung von sozialen Netzwerken diskutiert. Die Analyse sozialer Netzwerke gibt Einblick in den historischen Kontext archäologischer Arbeit und erlaubt es, die Rollen von Männern und Frauen, Politikern, Soldaten, Künstlern, Architekten und Sponsoren bei der Ausgrabung, Interpretation, Präsentation und Rezepti- on von Archäologie zu untersuchen.