High Resolution Drone Surveying of the Pista Geoglyph in Palpa, Peru
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
geosciences Article High Resolution Drone Surveying of the Pista Geoglyph in Palpa, Peru Karel Pavelka *, Jaroslav Šedina and Eva Matoušková Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thakurova 7, Prague 6 16629, Czech Republic; [email protected] (J.Š.); [email protected] (E.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +42-22435-3865 Received: 3 November 2018; Accepted: 10 December 2018; Published: 13 December 2018 Abstract: Currently, satellite images can be used to document historical or archaeological sites in areas that are distant, dangerous, or expensive to visit, and they can be used instead of basic fieldwork in several cases. Nowadays, they have final resolution on 35–50 cm, which can be limited for searching of fine structures. Results using the analysis of very high resolution (VHR) satellite data and super resolution data from drone on an object nearby Palpa, Peru are discussed in this article. This study is a part of Nasca project focused on using satellite data for documentation and the analysis of the famous geoglyphs in Peru near Palpa and Nasca, and partially on the documentation of other historical objects. The use of drone shows advantages of this technology to achieve high resolution object documentation and analysis, which provide new details. The documented site was the “Pista” geoglyph. Discovering of unknown geoglyphs (a bird, a guinea pig, and other small drawings) was quite significant in the area of the well-known geoglyph. The new data shows many other details, unseen from the surface or from the satellite imagery, and provides the basis for updating current knowledge and theories about the use and construction of geoglyphs. Keywords: photogrammetry; RPAS; UAV; Peru; geoglyph Pista; mapping; drones 1. Introduction Remote sensing and Google Earth using satellite images became an instrument for archaeological documentation and research at the beginning of the new millennium [1]. New types of multispectral and stereoscopic data with very high resolution are an important source of data; in many projects, Google Earth can be used as a tool for the searching of new potential archaeological sites. The long-term usage of an aerial archaeological survey is very popular. RPAS (remotely piloted aircraft system) also known as UAV (unmanned aircraft vehicle) or drones, are nowadays gaining importance [2]. Very high resolution (VHR) satellite data with a ground sampling distance (GSD) better than 1 m have been at disposal for civilian purposes since 1999. They support a new analytical possibility in archaeology and historical object documentation. Current civilian satellite images with GSD 0.35–1.0 m in panchromatic or pan-sharpened images serve as a perfect source for the documentation of known objects or finding possible newly detected archaeological sites or objects [3]. Satellite imagery can be used in some cases instead of basic fieldwork for searching for new objects and generally for documentation or mapping of an area of interest. Our possibility to detect a new object from satellite data ends in the case of linear objects by their thickness at 30–50 cm (0.7–1.0 pixels), in the case of 3D or point objects, some pixels (depend on object, but at least four pixels) are necessary for statistically appropriate detection. This means that linear objects with a thickness smaller than 30 cm and a point object smaller than 50 cm in diameter are invisible to us and for this reason unknown. Outputs with a better GSD can be obtained using aerial methods; however, they are not at their disposal or they are too expensive for small projects in many countries. There is a gap between remotely sensed data with GSD 50 cm Geosciences 2018, 8, 479; doi:10.3390/geosciences8120479 www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences Geosciences 2018, 8, 479 2 of 20 Geosciences 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 they are not at their disposal or they are too expensive for small projects in many countries. There is and GSD 5 cm; however, the better resolution can be important in special cases—e.g., searching of fine a gap between remotely sensed data with GSD 50 cm and GSD 5 cm; however, the better resolution details in orthophoto or in shaded digital surface model. can be important in special cases—e.g., searching of fine details in orthophoto or in shaded digital This problem can solve use of RPAS (remotely piloted aircraft system or simple “drones”), surface model. they typicallyThis problem provide can datasolve withuse of a RPAS GSD (remotely better than piloted 5 cm. aircraft It has system been or possible simple to“drones”), use data they from RPAStypically since provide 2010. However, data with ita isGSD not better easy than to use 5 cm. it in It some has been cases, possible because to use of a data meteorological, from RPAS since safety, or2010. bureaucratic However, point it ofis view.not easy However, to use surfaceit in some large cases, archaeological because of objects a meteorological, are very well visiblesafety, fromor heightbureaucratic such as subsurfacepoint of view. objects However, based surface on crop large marks archaeological [3–7]. objects are very well visible from heightIn particular, such as subsurface they are objectsobjects based that are on notcrop overshadowed marks [3–7]. by growing vegetation—i.e., object in desert orIn semi-desertparticular, they areas. are Such objects an that area are isPeru, not over whereshadowed more advanced by growing civilizations vegetation—i.e., existed object in the in dry coastaldesert areas or semi-desert before the areas. conquest. Such an area is Peru, where more advanced civilizations existed in the dry coastal areas before the conquest. 1.1. Geoglyphs and Lines: State-of-the-Art 1.1.Near Geoglyphs Nasca and city, Lines: approximately State-of-the-Art 400 km southeast from the Peruvian capital city Lima (Figure1), there isNear a famous Nasca archaeological city, approximately area, which 400 km contains southeast thousands from the of Peruvian world-known capital geoglyphscity Lima (Figure and lines. The1), Nasca there is city a famous is located archaeological 40 km from area, the which Pacific contains coast inthousands a dry landscape, of world-known interwoven geoglyphs with and fertile valleyslines. withThe Nasca occasional city is rivers. located The 40 first km scientificfrom the informationPacific coast aboutin a dry geoglyphs landscape, and interwoven lines in Peruvian with desertfertile was valleys brought with by occasional P. Kosok, whorivers. later The collaborated first scientific with information M. Reiche. about Dr. Maria geoglyphs Reiche, and a charismatic lines in scientistPeruvian born desert in Dresden/Germany, was brought by P. Kosok, worked who in thelater Peruvian collaborated desert with near M. Nasca Reiche. city Dr. to Maria document Reiche, and explaina charismatic interesting scientist geoglyphs born in and Dresden/Germany, lines in the city worked neighbourhood in the Peruvian since WW desert II. near Based Nasca on her city work, to thedocument Nasca lines and and explain geoglyphs interesting were geoglyphs added to and the lines UNESCO in the city (United neighbourhood Nations Educational, since WW II. Scientific Based andon Cultural her work, Organization) the Nasca worldlines heritageand geoglyphs list in 1995 were and added they areto preservedthe UNESCO by Peruvian(United lawNations [8–11 ]. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) world heritage list in 1995 and they are preserved Other areas were not under auspices of law and they are in very bad condition, such as cases [10,11]. by Peruvian law [8–11]. Other areas were not under auspices of law and they are in very bad The origin of geoglyphs and lines is not clear, with many scientists and laics trying to explain the condition, such as cases [10,11]. The origin of geoglyphs and lines is not clear, with many scientists origin and reason [11,12]. The main hypothesis, which attempts to explain the origin of geoglyphs and and laics trying to explain the origin and reason [11,12]. The main hypothesis, which attempts to lines, talks about the astronomical reason (calendar) [8,9,12], the designation of water resources [13], explain the origin of geoglyphs and lines, talks about the astronomical reason (calendar) [8,9,12], the anddesignation religious ritualsof water [9 ,resources14–16]. There [13], and are alsoreligious technical rituals theories [9,14–16]. that There they are were also areas technical for weaving theories or spinningthat they long were ropes areas [17 for–19 weaving]. There areor spinning also bizarre long theories ropes [17–19]. about extra-terrestrials,There are also bizarre pre-Columbian theories Olympiaabout extra-terrestrials, games, art, etc. [pre-Columbian11,20]. Olympia games, art, etc. [11,20]. (A) (B) FigureFigure 1. (1.A )( GeoglyphA) Geoglyph Pista Pista near Palpa,near Palpa, (Google (Google Earth, Earth, satellite satellite image fromimage 2013) from and 2013) (B) localizationand (B) oflocalization cities Palpa of and cities Nasca Palpa in and Peru Nasca (Google in Peru maps). (Google maps). SomeSome lines lines and and objects objects were were analysedanalysed asas astronomicallyastronomically oriented oriented [8,9,11,12,20–23], [8,9,11,12,20–23 ],with with many many lineslines or or geoglyphs geoglyphs neither neither of of known known originorigin nornor originaloriginal use. use. It It is is not not the the goal goal to to argue argue about about the the originorigin or or purposes purposes of of geoglyphs; geoglyphs; however,however, thethe result of detailed detailed documentation documentation may may serve serve other other professionals [16]. Unfortunately, simply explained theories are always sought. Apparently, there is no Geosciences 2018, 8, 479 3 of 20 uniform use of geoglyphs and lines, which is due to long-term land use. It should be noted that the geoglyphs are of different types and they could have been created by different civilizations, which used geoglyphs and lines differently.