DOCSLIB.ORG

Universiv Miaorilms International

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to phofegraph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation o f techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target’’ for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication o f either blurred copy because o f movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method o f “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer o f a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. UniversiV M iaorilm s International 300 N.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8324428 Kozy, Charlene Johnson A HISTORY OF THE GEORGIA LOYALISTS AND THE PLANTATION PERIOD IN THE TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS Middle Tennessee State University D A. 1983 University Microfilms I nternStionsl 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Copyright 1983 by Kozy, Charlene Johnson All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A HISTORY OF THE GEORGIA LOYALISTS AND THE PLANTATION PERIOD IN THE TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS Charlene Johnson Kozy A dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of Middle Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Arts August, 1983 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A HISTORY OF THE GEORGIA LOYALISTS AND THE PLANTATION PERIOD IN THE TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS APPROVED : G raduate Committee : Major Professor A c -, ^ /jÂi' Crtmmi r f.p e Mp.mbpr MPTTihpr Committee Member i t t e e MemberCommittee V Head of the Department o£ History Dean of the «Gradua te^ School Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT A HISTORY OF THE GEORGIA LOYALISTS AHD THE PLANTATION PERIOD IN THE TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS by Charlene Johnson Kozy This study traces the attitudes and behavior of adherents to the British Crown in the colony of Georgia during the Revolutionary War and their experience in exile. The study is important for the unique story it tells which begins in Georgia with the war fought between Whigs and Loyalists and ends with the Loyalists' resettlement on Grand Caicos. Further, the work is especially important as a documentary record because printed documents relating to the Loyalists who settled Grand Caicos are almost non­ e x i s t e n t . The search for primary sources began with the few historians who have published documentary works concerning Loyalists: Lorenzo Sabine, Wilbur H. Wright, and Hugh Edward Egerton. The "Old Series" (1790-1850) of the Bahama Registry, purchased on microfilm from the Bahamian govern­ ment in Nassau, includes land grants issued under George III, estate appraisals, conveyances, and wills. The Public Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Charlene Johnson Kozy Library in New York and the Public Archives in Ottawa hold manuscripts of the Commissioners of Claims' Reports made following the Revolutionary War for the British government. The manuscripts of Lydia Parrish, on deposit in the P. K. Yonge Library of Florida History at the University of Florida, yielded valuable primary material. In addition, the author personally inspected plantation ruins on Grand Caicos to correlate documented data with topography, land marks, and other geographical features. This study found that there was a concerted effort on the part of a group of like-minded men, from similar backgrounds, tied together by common goals, to recreate a way of life which they had been forced to abandon in North America. These men are catalogued variously by origin, family, occupation, and property loss in North America. They were wealthy, predominantly high-ranking officers in the armies of the King, who had been active politically in North America and later in the Bahamas. They were, in fact, successful in building a plantation society on Grand Caicos. While the Plantation Period lasted only three decades, this study effectively adds another step to the historical process of identifying the Loyalists in exile. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author of this dissertation wishes to acknowledge the help and interest of those who made this study possible. Dr. William T. Windham, Chairman of the History Department of Middle Tennessee State University, gave initial encouragement for the work. Mrs. Frances Hunter, librarian for interlibrary loan of the Todd Library at Middle Tennessee State University, worked diligently in locating sources. The author is deeply indebted to the members of her committee: Dr. Frederick S. Rolater, Dr. Fred Colvin, Dr. James Neal, Dr. Charles W. Babb, and Dr. Mario Perez-Reilly, The author is especially appreciative of the Chairman, Dr. Frederick S. Rolater, whose kind manner and guidance helped complete the work. The author wishes to acknowledge her friends on the Caicos Islands, Constance and Emmanuel Hall and Valerie Hamilton, for their hospitality and help on the Islands. Lastly, gratitude is extended to the author's children for accepting her absence on many occasions, to her mother, and especially to her husband, Steve, for his tolerance and long hours of proofreading this work. It is the author's hope that they will share with her the success of completing this endeavor. i i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS................................................................................................... iv LIST OF CHART .............................................................................................. v LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS................................................................................ v i INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... v i i C hapter I . THE TURKS AND CAICOS IS L A N D S ............................... 1 I I . GEORGIA: 1763-1775 ................................................................. 14 I I I . THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR IN GEORGIA: 1776-1778. 28 IV. THE BRITISH RETURN TO GEORGIA AND THE AFTERMATH: 1778-1782 ............................................................ 46 V. EAST FLORIDA TO THE BAHAMAS: 1782-1785 .... 61 VI. CLAIMS AND COMPENSATION.............................................. 75 V II. POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND COLLECTIVE BIOGRAPHY . 105 V III. THE PLANTATION PERIOD ON TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS: 1789-1820 ................................................................. 140 IX. SUMMARY...................................................................................... 178 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................... 181 X li Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF MAPS 1. Northwestern Caribbean ................................................................ 3 2. Turks and Caicos Islands ........................................................ 4 3. Major Landmarks in theHistory of the Georgia Loyalists ................................................................. 36 4. North Caicos ...................................................................................... 103 5. Middle C aicos ................................................................................. 104 IV Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF CHART L. Attempted Invasions of East Florida by Georgia M ilitia and Continental Troops 1776-1778 ........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Migration, Freedom and Enslavement in the Revolutionary Atlantic: the Bahamas, 1783–C

    Migration, Freedom and Enslavement in the Revolutionary Atlantic: the Bahamas, 1783–C

    Migration, Freedom and Enslavement in the Revolutionary Atlantic: The Bahamas, 1783–c. 1800 Paul Daniel Shirley October 2011 UCL PhD thesis 1 I, Paul Daniel Shirley, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: _____________________________ (Paul Daniel Shirley) 2 Abstract This thesis examines the impact of revolution upon slavery in the Atlantic world, focusing upon the period of profound and unprecedented change and conflict in the Bahamas during the final decades of the eighteenth century. It argues that the Bahamian experience can only be satisfactorily understood with reference to the revolutionary upheavals that were transforming the larger Atlantic world in those years. From 1783, the arrival of black and white migrants displaced by the American Revolution resulted in quantitative and qualitative social, economic and political transformation in the Bahamas. The thesis assesses the nature and significance of the sudden demographic shift to a non-white majority in the archipelago, the development of many hitherto unsettled islands, and efforts to construct a cotton-based plantation economy. It also traces the trajectory and dynamics of the complex struggles that ensued from these changes. During the 1780s, émigré Loyalist slaveholders from the American South, intent on establishing a Bahamian plantocracy, confronted not only non-white Bahamians exploring enlarged possibilities for greater control over their own lives, but also an existing white population determined to defend their own interests, and a belligerent governor with a penchant for idiosyncratic antislavery initiatives. In the 1790s, a potentially explosive situation was inflamed still further as a new wave of war and revolution engulfed the Atlantic.
  • Florida Historical Quarterly

    Florida Historical Quarterly

    COVER British East Florida reached from the St. Marys River on the north to the Apalachicola River on the west and its capital stood at St. Augustine. The province of West Florida extended westward to the Mississippi River and to the thirty-first parallel on the north (and after 1764 to thirty-two degrees twenty-eight minutes). Pensacola served as its capital. Guillaume Delisle published his “Carte du Mexique et de la Floride des Terres Angloises et des Isles Antilles du Cours et des Environs de la Rivière de Mississippi,” in his Atlas Nouveau, vol. 2, no. 29 (Amsterdam, 1741[?]). The map first appeared in Paris in 1703. This portion of the map is repro- duced from a copy (1722 PKY 76) in the P. K. Yonge Library of Florida His- tory, University of Florida, Gainesville. THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Volume LIV, Number 4 April 1976 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY SAMUEL PROCTOR, Editor STEPHEN KERBER, Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD LUIS R. ARANA Castillo de San Marcos, St. Augustine HERBERT J. DOHERTY, JR. University of Florida JOHN K. MAHON University of Florida WILLIAM W. ROGERS Florida State University JERRELL H. SHOFNER Florida Technological University CHARLTON W. TEBEAU University of Miami Correspondence concerning contributions, books for review, and all editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Florida Historical Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida 32604. The Quarterly is interested in articles and documents pertaining to the history of Florida. Sources, style, footnote form, original- ity of material and interpretation, clarity of thought, and interest of readers are considered. All copy, including footnotes, should be double-spaced.
  • Guide to Canadian Sources Related to Southern Revolutionary War

    Guide to Canadian Sources Related to Southern Revolutionary War

    Research Project for Southern Revolutionary War National Parks National Parks Service Solicitation Number: 500010388 GUIDE TO CANADIAN SOURCES RELATED TO SOUTHERN REVOLUTIONARY WAR NATIONAL PARKS by Donald E. Graves Ensign Heritage Consulting PO Box 282 Carleton Place, Ontario Canada, K7C 3P4 in conjunction with REEP INC. PO Box 2524 Leesburg, VA 20177 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND GUIDE TO CONTENTS OF STUDY 1A: Object of Study 1 1B: Summary of Survey of Relevant Primary Sources in Canada 1 1C: Expanding the Scope of the Study 3 1D: Criteria for the Inclusion of Material 3 1E: Special Interest Groups (1): The Southern Loyalists 4 1F: Special Interest Groups (2): Native Americans 7 1G: Special Interest Groups (3): African-American Loyalists 7 1H: Special Interest Groups (4): Women Loyalists 8 1I: Military Units that Fought in the South 9 1J: A Guide to the Component Parts of this Study 9 PART 2: SURVEY OF ARCHIVAL SOURCES IN CANADA Introduction 11 Ontario Queen's University Archives, Kingston 11 University of Western Ontario, London 11 National Archives of Canada, Ottawa 11 National Library of Canada, Ottawa 27 Archives of Ontario, Toronto 28 Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library 29 Quebec Archives Nationales de Quebec, Montreal 30 McCord Museum / McGill University Archives, Montreal 30 Archives de l'Universite de Montreal 30 New Brunswick 32 Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, Fredericton 32 Harriet Irving Memorial Library, Fredericton 32 University of New Brunswick Archives, Fredericton 32 New Brunswick Museum Archives,
  • Augusta   Ugusta and St

    Augusta   Ugusta and St

    +ISVKME©W+ISVKME©W American Revolution Places 6IZSPYXMSREV];EV6IZSPYXMSREV];EV to Discover in Augusta ugusta and St. Paul’s Parish (Richmond County Abeginning in 1777) was a focal point of military 1 and political activity in Georgia during the American 2 3 Revolution. The small, backcountry town of approxi- 4 “Discovering Our Heritage mately one hundred families was the site of two ma- jor battles for its possession, was where Georgia’s and History” first constitution was drafted, and was Georgia’s 5 Revolutionary capital after the capture of Savannah. Augusta was also home to one of Georgia’s signers Augusta of the Declaration of Independence, George Walton, 6 and one of the signers of the U. S. Constitution, Wil- liam Few. It was here in January 1788, that Georgia in the 7 MAp OF was the fourth State to ratify the U.S. Constitution. GEORGIA, • St. Paul’s Churchyard Located at 605 Reynolds 8 1778 Street. A monument marking Col. William Few’s American grave is where annually on Constitution Day in Sep- tember, the Daughters of the American Revolution and Sons of the American Revolution hold a com- American Revolution in Georgia Revolution memorative ceremony. Revolutionary War Patriots 1 ( ) Oliver Bowen, John Forsyth, George Mathews, Elbert County – Fight at Van n ’s Creek GPS: N34.162 W82.744 John Wilson and William Young are also buried in “A war of extermination became the Churchyard. GPS: N33.476 W81.960 2 Wilkes County – Battle of Kettle Creek the order of the day.” • Fort Augusta - Fort Cornwallis Historical Marker GPS: N33.691 W82.886 – Lt.
  • Raising the Revolutionaries' Banner 1775-1776

    Raising the Revolutionaries' Banner 1775-1776

    Vol. 4 No. 3_____________________________________________ __July-August-September 2007 Raising the Revolutionaries’ Banner 1775-1776 19th century magic lanternslide depicting SC Patriot Sgt. William Jasper of the 2d South Carolina Continental Line, commanded by Col. William Moultrie, heroically re-raising the battered South Carolina standard over the parapet of the sand and palmetto log Fort Sullivan during the British naval bombardment of June 28-29, 1776. Mike Coker, the South Carolina Historical Society’s image expert, reports that this image is from a lanternslide painted by artists at the C. W. Briggs Company. The title on the slide is: “Sergeant Jasper at Ft. Moultrie, 1776”; it is a transparency, collodion on glass; size 3 1/4 X 4 inches. The Briggs were an American family of lanternists, slide painters and manufacturers. Daniel Briggs started painting and selling slides in 1850. Later the firm became C. (Caspear) W. Briggs and Co. in Philadelphia. Slides were made from stock negatives and colored by hand. (1850-1930s) This slide’s artist is unknown. Image is courtesy of the SCII Regiment. Artist Lucy Brown made a painting of this image in 1975, the original of which hangs in the main offices of the South Carolina Forestry Commission, 5500 Broad River Road, Columbia. In This Edition: Native Americans and the Southern Revolution, Part II: Independence and the 1776 Cherokee War………......………21 Editor / Publisher’s Notes………………………....……….…2 Insubordination of Captain Polk’s Rangers During the Upcoming SCAR events……………………..……....3, 4 and 7 Summer of 1775….……………………….….………………....28 Southern Revolutionary War Institute…………………..…12 Subjects of the Crown “The Queen’s own Loyal Virginia Letters to the Editor…………………………….…..………..11 Regiment and Dunmore’s Ethiopian Regiment, 1775- Calendar of Upcoming Events………………….….…..……15 1776”……………………………..……………………………...34 “Under the Crown” Living History Event………………….19 1 Editor’s Notes flavor.
  • Augusta 1 1 Ugusta and St

    Augusta 1 1 Ugusta and St

    Georgia’sGeorgia’s 17 17 American Revolution Places 5 5 8 8 RevolutionaryRevolutionary War 7 7 3 3 7 7 to Discover in Augusta 1 1 ugusta and St. Paul’s Parish (Richmond County Abeginning in 1777) was a focal point of military 1 and political activity in Georgia during the American 2 3 Revolution. The small, backcountry town of approxi- 4 “Discovering Our Heritage mately one hundred families was the site of two ma- jor battles for its possession, was where Georgia’s and History” first constitution was drafted, and was Georgia’s 5 Revolutionary capital after the capture of Savannah. Augusta was also home to one of Georgia’s signers Augusta of the Declaration of Independence, George Walton, 6 and one of the signers of the U. S. Constitution, Wil- liam Few. It was here in January 1788, that Georgia in the 7 MAP OF was the fourth State to ratify the U.S. Constitution. GEORGIA, • St. Paul’s Churchyard Located at 605 Reynolds 8 1778 Street. A monument marking Col. William Few’s American grave is where annually on Constitution Day in Sep- tember, the Daughters of the American Revolution and Sons of the American Revolution hold a com- American Revolution in Georgia Revolution memorative ceremony. Revolutionary War Patriots 1 ( ) Oliver Bowen, John Forsyth, George Mathews, Elbert County – Fight at Vann ’s Creek GPS: N34.162 W82.744 John Wilson and William Young are also buried in “A war of extermination became the Churchyard. GPS: N33.476 W81.960 2 Wilkes County – Battle of KettleCreek the order of the day.” • Fort Augusta - Fort Cornwallis Historical Marker GPS: N33.691 W82.886 – Lt.
  • Augusta in the American Revolution in October 1780

    Augusta in the American Revolution in October 1780

    Georgia’s Georgia’s 17 17 American Revolution Places 5 5 8 8 RevolutionaryRevolutionary War 7 7 3 3 7 7 to Discover in Augusta 1 1 ugusta and St. Paul’s Parish (Richmond County Abeginning in 1777) was a focal point of military 1 and political activity in Georgia during the American 2 3 Revolution. The small, backcountry town of approxi- 4 “Discovering Our Heritage mately one hundred families was the site of two ma- jor battles for its possession, was where Georgia’s and History” first constitution was drafted, and was Georgia’s 5 Revolutionary capital after the capture of Savannah. Augusta was also home to one of Georgia’s signers Augusta of the Declaration of Independence, George Walton, 6 and one of the signers of the U. S. Constitution, Wil- liam Few. It was here in January 1788, that Georgia in the 7 MAP OF was the fourth State to ratify the U.S. Constitution. GEORGIA, • St. Paul’s Churchyard Located at 605 Reynolds 8 1778 Street. A monument marking Col. William Few’s American grave is where annually on Constitution Day in Sep- tember, the Daughters of the American Revolution and Sons of the American Revolution hold a com- American Revolution in Georgia Revolution memorative ceremony. Revolutionary War Patriots 1 ( ) Oliver Bowen, John Forsyth, George Mathews, Elbert County – Fight at Vann ’s Creek GPS: N34.162 W82.744 John Wilson and William Young are also buried in “A war of extermination became the Churchyard. GPS: N33.476 W81.960 2 Wilkes County – Battle of KettleCreek the order of the day.” • Fort Augusta - Fort Cornwallis Historical Marker GPS: N33.691 W82.886 – Lt.
  • George Galphin and Indian-White Relations in the Georgia

    George Galphin and Indian-White Relations in the Georgia

    GEORGE GALPHIN AND INDIAN-WHITE RELATIONS IN THE GEORGIA BACKCOUNTRY DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION John McKay Sheftall Macon, Georgia B.A., University of Georgia, 1980 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May 1983 GEORGE GALPHIN AND INDIAN-WHITE RELATIONS IN THE GEORGIA BACKCOUNTRY DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION John McKay Sheftall Macon, Georgia Approved: ^ Date /9 Major Professor / U h "Ai i-z-t Date Jp. j !<?<* ? Second Reader TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface iv Chapter I: Neutrality: The First Federal Indian Policy . , 1 Chapter II: Backcountry Diplomacy, 1775-1778 19 Chapter III: War with the Indians, 1778-1782 44 Notes 62 Bibliography 74 PREFACE The history of Indian-white relations during the American Revolution is unusually complex. Before the Revolution the British developed an Indian policy which Indian superintendents and colo- nial governors attempted to implement in the Southeast as well as elsewhere in the colonies. However, this policy conflicted fre- quently with economic interests of Indian traders and backcountry settlers. After 1775 when these same Americans had an opportunity to formulate their own policy, new competing interests emerged. Backcountry settlers wanted to grab more Indian lands at the risk of war with the Indians, while traders wished to maintain peace along the frontier. Newly formed state governments attempted to solve this conflict diplomatically, and even the Continental Congress voiced its opinion by establishing Indian neutrality as an official goal. The responsibility for implementing the first Indian policy of the United States devolved primarily upon commissioners and agents appointed by the Continental Congress and individual state legislatures.
  • An Ill-Timed and Premature Insurrection, the First Siege At

    An Ill-Timed and Premature Insurrection, the First Siege At

    Vol. 2 No. 9 _____ _______________________ _________ _ __ September 2005 “An Ill-timed and Premature Insurrection” The First Siege at Augusta, Georgia September 14 - 18, 1780 by Steven J. Rauch Map 1 - Downtown Augusta, Georgia showing 18th Century landmarks and initial troop dispositions for Whig Lt. Col. Elijah Clarke’s attack on the Tory stronghold of Augusta. Maps by author based on USGS 7.5 minute topographic map. Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Brown, commander of the Provincial head of Crown forces was made possible by the successful British King’s Carolina Rangers, led his men on June 8, 1780 into Augusta, capture of Charleston, South Carolina on May 12, 1780 where Major Georgia, the scene of his torment, torture and disfigurement at the General Benjamin Lincoln surrendered his Continental forces to a hands of Whigs in August 1775.1 Brown’s triumphal return at the feathered. He was then paraded through Augusta in a cart where 1Thomas Brown was hit in the head with a rifle, which fractured his ridicule was heaped upon him by Whig supporters. The definitive skull, tied to a tree and had burning pieces of wood stuck under his book on Brown is Edward J. Cashin, The King’s Ranger: Thomas feet. His hair was scalped from his head in three or four places and he Brown and the American Revolution on the Southern Frontier. lost two toes due to the burning suffered when he was tarred and Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1989. 1 powerful British land and naval force commanded by Lieutenant Savannah River and it served as the gateway to trade and General Henry Clinton.

  • Muskogee Internationalism in an Age of Revolution, 1763-1818

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects Fall 2016 Muskogee Internationalism in An Age of Revolution, 1763-1818 James L. Hill College of William and Mary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hill, James L., "Muskogee Internationalism in An Age of Revolution, 1763-1818" (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1477067930. http://doi.org/10.21220/S2H59V This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Muskogee Internationalism in an Age of Revolution, 1763-1818” James L. Hill Jacksonville, FL M.A., University of North Florida, 2010 B.A., University of North Florida, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2016 © Copyright by James L. Hill 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation reevaluates the consequences of the American Revolution by examining how indigenous peoples preserved their role as regional powers in the decades following the birth of the United States. Focusing on the Creek Indians of the present-day southeastern United States, I demonstrate that they maintained ties with Britons, Spaniards, and other Native peoples, employing these connections to their advantage. Creeks created borderlands that connected their societies with those of the British and Spanish Caribbean.
  • Patrolling the Border: Theft and Violence on the Creek

    Patrolling the Border: Theft and Violence on the Creek

    PATROLLING THE BORDER: THEFT AND VIOLENCE ON THE CREEK-GEORGIA FRONTIER, 1770-1796 by JOSHUA SPANN HAYNES Under the Direction of Claudio Saunt ABSTRACT At a critical moment in the late eighteenth century, Muskogee Creek Indians faced the prospect of dispensing with their indigenous form of government based on the political autonomy of each Creek town. Ultimately, however, they chose to retain their indigenous government in altered form. Georgia continually encroached on Creek borders forcing Muskogees into a conversation about the nature of political leadership that hinged on what kind of government could best protect Muskogee liberty, territory, and sovereignty. Some favored a powerful central government, but most preferred the autonomy of every Creek town, or talwa. Under assault from multiple quarters, Creeks experimented with state-like political solutions such as the diplomacy of elite headmen and skilled figurehead executives. Most importantly, Creek warriors launched over a thousand raids along their contested border, actions best understood as robust border patrol. Such innovations drew on indigenous political ideals, and, for a time, effectively stalled American expansion. Neither Creek nor Georgia leaders, however, exercised state control over their people and their territory. White Georgians exaggerated the ferocity of Creek raids and crafted a political narrative they used to justify their own violence and land taking. When Creeks and Georgians raided each other’s communities, they challenged higher political authorities,
  • MATTHEW F. K. Mcdaniel Georgia's Forgotten Battlefields: a Survey of and Recommendations for Selected Revolutionary War Battle

    MATTHEW F. K. Mcdaniel Georgia's Forgotten Battlefields: a Survey of and Recommendations for Selected Revolutionary War Battle

    MATTHEW F. K. McDANIEL Georgia’s Forgotten Battlefields: A Survey of and Recommendations for Selected Revolutionary War Battlefields and Sites in the State (Under the Direction of DR. MARK REINBERGER) Although not entirely neglected by scholars, the American Revolution in Georgia has essentially remained a footnote to the state’s Civil War history. Several Federally- and state-owned sites both interpret and commemorate Civil War battles fought on Georgia soil. Despite active and important military participation in the Revolution, Georgia contains only one state-owned site related to the Revolution, and it provides only a broad interpretation of military events occurring there. The portions of some additional sites are held by local municipal governments, but resources are not currently available to appropriately protect, commemorate, or interpret the sites. Under direction of the National Park Service’s American Battlefield Protection Program and the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, researcher Matt McDaniel was able to research, visit, and document eleven Revolutionary War-era sites in Georgia. He found a variety of site conditions, most of which lean towards neglect. However, opportunities exist to continue to research and investigate some of these sites, and, in the future, more appropriately protect and commemorate them. INDEX WORDS: Battlefield(s), Historic Preservation, Augusta, Cherokee Ford, Fort Cornwallis, Fort Grierson, Fort Morris, Frederica, Hutchinson Island, New Ebenezer, Savannah, Sunbury, Battle of Brier Creek, Battle of Kettle Creek, Battle of the Rice Boats, Rebecca and Hinchinbrooke GEORGIA’S FORGOTTEN BATTLEFIELDS: A SURVEY OF AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SELECTED REVOLUTIONARY WAR BATTLEFIELDS AND SITES IN THE STATE by MATTHEW F.